Trump’s Latest Target: Corporate Landlords

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: Big Take – “Trump’s Latest Target: Corporate Landlords”

Date: January 15, 2026
Host: Sarah Holder (Bloomberg)
Guests/Reporters: Patrick Clark (Bloomberg, real estate), Kristin Capps (Bloomberg City Lab housing reporter)

---

Main Theme

This episode examines President Donald Trump's surprising new proposal to ban institutional investors—often referred to as “corporate landlords”—from purchasing additional single-family homes in the U.S. The discussion covers why this approach is gaining traction, its policy roots, likely impacts, and skepticism surrounding whether targeting Wall Street landlords will meaningfully improve housing affordability.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Trump’s Policy Platform: An Unexpected Turn

• Trump, traditionally associated with real estate and backed by key real estate donors, is now targeting the same industry in response to escalating public anger over housing unaffordability.
• His administration is floating big interventions: a $200 billion mortgage bond buy, introducing 50-year mortgages, and now a ban on institutional investment in single-family homes.
• The proposal surprised observers since Trump’s own associates and major donors (like Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman) are deeply tied to real estate.

  “Trump is famously a real estate guy, and some of his biggest donors are in the very sector that his proposal would target.” – Sarah Holder [03:49]

2. The Rise of Corporate Landlords

• The influx began in the wake of the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, when Wall Street snapped up huge numbers of foreclosed homes cheaply.
• Investment firms like Blackstone bought thousands of homes, turning them into rentals and expanding rapidly, especially in markets hit hard by the crisis (e.g., Atlanta).
• Algorithmic and cash-offer tactics put regular homebuyers at a disadvantage.

  “Homes were very cheap and a number of Wall street firms stepped in... and were able to start amassing pretty large portfolios.” – Patrick Clark [05:52] “Algorithmic buying really locks out potential home buyers... these corporations can submit an all cash offer with no contingencies, no inspections, over asking price. There’s no household that can or would buy a home in that way.” – Kristin Capps [10:24]

3. The True Scope of Institutional Ownership

• Despite high visibility, institutional investors own a small fraction (~3-4%) of single-family rental homes nationally (about 500,000–600,000 out of millions nationwide).
• Local impacts can be huge: in Atlanta, over 30% of single-family rentals are institutionally owned.
• The industry contends they're scapegoats for a broader housing crisis.

  “Why are you guys targeting us? We're a very small part of the housing market.” – Patrick Clark, summarizing industry sentiment [08:40]

4. Impact of Corporate Landlords on Tenants and Housing

• Studies show mixed effects:
  • Bigger landlords may raise neighborhood rents, but also sometimes increase rental supply, potentially alleviating prices.
  • Reports document higher eviction rates and more code violations in properties run by large firms—especially where tenant protections are weak.
• Corporate landlords sometimes upgrade neglected properties, offering quality homes for renters.

  “It's not necessarily the case that large landlords are worse than small landlords, but in the areas where they have been most active, there are fewer tenant protections.” – Kristin Capps [12:48]

5. The Politics: Bi-Partisan Appetite or Political Theater?

• The idea of restricting Wall Street landlords now resonates with both parties.
  • Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris have proposed regulation. VP J.D. Vance and other Republicans have criticized corporate homebuying.
• Trump's move: Some see it as “political red meat”—redirection for a frustrated electorate ahead of the midterms.
• Wall Street’s reaction so far: Share price dip for Blackstone, but insiders mostly unfazed, citing lack of policy specifics and history of grandstanding.
• Key question: Would any ban be on further purchases, or would it require selling off existing holdings (forced divestiture)? Early indications suggest the former.

  “Half the stuff he says doesn't go anywhere. People have been talking about this forever and it's always just grandstanding and we don't have anything to worry about.” – Patrick Clark, summarizing industry view [18:45] “Is that a ban on purchasing? Is that a ban on ownership? Is that legal? I don't think these questions have been fully played out.” – Kristin Capps [18:57]

6. The Policy Mechanics and Market Impact

• Details are scant: Trump promises further information at the World Economic Forum (Davos).
• Legislation would likely set an upper limit of homes owned—e.g., a cap at 1,000 or 2,000 per company. Some suggested tax changes for large holders.
• Even if legislation passes, most economists doubt this would materially improve affordability, since institutional investors represent a minor market share compared to systemic issues—like housing shortages and high interest rates.

  “There's not many macroeconomists who are going to point to institutional buyers as a major factor in America's problems with housing affordability.” – Kristin Capps [21:23]

7. The Broader Housing Legislative Landscape

• Broader efforts, like the “Road to Housing” act, have faltered, stripped from larger bills and lacking clear administration support.
• Senator Warren notes lack of concrete moves by the Trump administration to support meaningful supply-side reforms.

  “A stray, somewhat isolated post on social media [doesn't] really move the ball or indicate that the Trump administration is focused on this issue.” – (Paraphrasing Warren, via Kristin Capps) [22:14]

---

Memorable Quotes & Timestamps

• Patrick Clark on institutional investor image:
  “You find yourself bidding against a company that can move more quickly and that's making buying decisions in a way that has no relation to the way you're thinking about it. … That's why people don't like them. That's why they've become popular or convenient targets.” [11:00]
• Kristin Capps on high-concentration regions:
  “In metro Atlanta, more than 30% of the area's single family rental properties are owned by large corporations.” [09:36]
• Patrick Clark on the politics:
  “Affordability is the political issue of our, you know, of the moment, right? It feels unfair if you want to buy a house and you lose to a company. And it's just been red meat politically for years.” [13:35]
• Kristin Capps on potential policy design:
  “Is it a dozen homes? Is it two dozen? What makes you an aggregator?” [20:08]

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 02:27 – Trump’s new housing affordability proposals
• 03:17 – Bi-partisan roots of corporate landlord critique
• 05:52 – Wall Street enters housing post-2008
• 08:02 – How big are institutional landlords, really?
• 09:36 – Local hotspots: Atlanta and beyond
• 11:00 – How Wall Street buying changes the homebuying experience
• 12:48 – Corporate landlord effects on tenants and local law
• 13:35 – The political calculus for targeting Wall Street
• 18:45 – Industry response: Dismissal and skepticism
• 21:23 – Macro view: Is this the real problem in housing?
• 22:14 – Big housing bills in Congress and Warren’s criticism

---

Conclusion

The episode underscores that while “banning” big landlords may have soundbite appeal and some bipartisan roots, its market impact is likely minor compared to larger issues like supply constraints and high interest rates. Still, as both a populist and bipartisan cause, the idea may have legs—especially as midterm election politics heat up. The industry, for now, remains watchful but largely unconcerned, awaiting policy specifics as the White House teases more details for Davos.

Transcript

[Podcast Host / Wise Advertiser]

This podcast is brought to you by Wise the smarter way to manage your money internationally if you're getting a headache from juggling different currencies and different bank accounts in different countries, there's a better way to receive money in the currency you need without the slow transfer times or hidden fees. Meet Wise the savvy way to handle your money internationally. Hold balances in up to 40 currencies with the mid market exchange rate on every conversion. Whether you're receiving payments from tenants abroad, earning as a digital nomad, or converting dividends from your international investments, the Wise Multi currency account is Be Smart. Get Wise, download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Terms and Conditions apply. Did my card go through?

[Sarah Holder]

Oh no.

[Podcast Host / Wise Advertiser]

Your small business depends on its Internet, so switch to Verizon Business and you could get LTE Business Internet starting at $39 a month when paired with Select Business Mobile Plans. That's unlimited data for Unlimited Business.

[Okta Advertiser]

There we go.

[Podcast Host / Wise Advertiser]

Get the Internet you need at the price you want. Verizon Business Starting price For LTE Business Internet 25 Mbps Unlimited Data Plan with Select Veriz Business Smartphone Plan. Savings terms apply.

[Public Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from public on public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Patrick Clark]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comDisclosures.

[Podcast Host / Wise Advertiser]

Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News.

[Sarah Holder]

Buying a home in America is getting harder and harder and President Donald Trump has been throwing a lot of ideas at the Wall to address the country's persistent housing affordability crisis. The President says he's directing the federal government to buy $200 billion in mortgage.

[Patrick Clark]

Bonds working on a 50 year mortgage.

[Public Advertiser]

For home buyers, calling it a complete game changer.

[Patrick Clark]

Trump is also considering declaring a national.

[Kristin Capps]

Housing emergency due to high prices and low availability.

[Sarah Holder]

But his latest idea came as a bit of a surprise. Taking on corporate landlords. Just last week, Trump posted on Truth Social that he would be, quote, taking steps to ban institutional investors from buying more single family homes. In other words, getting Wall street out of the housing market.

[Kristin Capps]

Lawmakers, advocates on both the left and right have identified this new phenomenon as a culprit in the greater housing affordability problem.

[Sarah Holder]

Kristin Capps covers housing for Bloomberg City Lab.

[Kristin Capps]

However, it's not something that President Trump or the White House has talked about very much in this term. And in fact, you know, this same week, the Trump administration also approved a big merger of two large real estate companies.

[Sarah Holder]

Trump is famously a real estate guy, and some of his biggest donors are in the very sector that his proposal would target. But as housing costs become a major political issue, his administration has been looking for ways to bring them down. And banning big investors from the housing market is a policy idea that's actually circulated for a while among both Republicans and Democrats. Here's Patrick Clark, who covers real estate for Bloomberg.

[Patrick Clark]

In talking to people over the last week, there's definitely a sense that one, the administration wanted to do something meaningful on housing affordability. And going after these companies is something that plays well.

[Sarah Holder]

But Trump hasn't revealed much about how a policy like this would actually work.

[Patrick Clark]

Trump said he's going to announce more details at Davos, you know, the place that everyone goes to talk about inequity. Housing affordability. Yeah, housing affordability and inequality.

[Sarah Holder]

And whether cracking down on corporate landlords will make a meaningful difference is another question.

[Kristin Capps]

The number of homes that large landlords buy in any given year is very, very small. And I think it's difficult to really attach this greater affordability problem to, you know, those companies who do emerge as boogeymen on both the left and right.

[Sarah Holder]

I'm Sarah Holder and this is the big take from Bloomberg News today on the show, how Wall street bucks bought up a slice of the US Housing market, why Trump wants to stop it, and what impact that policy could have. The subprime mortgage crisis of the late 2000s led to a wave of foreclosures across the U.S. millions of Americans lost their homes. And in the wreckage of that Great Recession period, private equity companies and Wall street investors saw an opportunity.

[Patrick Clark]

Homes were very cheap and a number of Wall street firms stepped in, sometimes buying homes with cash on the courthouse steps and were able to start amassing pretty large portfolios.

[Sarah Holder]

Starting in 2012, investors were scooping up thousands of homes a month at steep discounts. By the start of 2013, investment firm Blackstone had spent over $2.5 billion buying up homes to manage his rentals.

[Patrick Clark]

It's all PTSD from the great financial crisis and the foreclosure crisis, or at least a lot of it is. That was really a terrible time in the economy and many people in different walks of life were affected by it. And there is a sense that these were the guys who came in and bought at a discount and made money out of that turmoil.

[Sarah Holder]

And after years of Wall street firms buying homes, another inflection point came in.

[Patrick Clark]

2020 post Covid when interest rates were cheap, when, you know, Sunbelt migration was the theme that everyone wanted to bet on, you know, a lot more money.

[Sarah Holder]

Came into this investment Firms had a leg up in the post pandemic housing market. When home prices and rents were bouncing back up, but interest rates were low, they could outbid the competition with all cash offers. Since then, institutional investors have continued to buy multifamily properties and single family homes and rent them out to families across the U.S. it can be a lucrative business.

[Patrick Clark]

The U.S. housing market is. This is a huge market, right? There's trillions of dollars worth of homes. So it's a big market you can invest in. Like you can tailor portfolios in the way that you want because it's so big and because there's different types of assets, so there's opportunities to diversify and sort of hedge risk. You know, if the economy in one city is, you know, is hur and you're not collecting as much rent there in Birmingham, Alabama or something, but Indianapolis is thriving. So there's those kinds of opportunities and it's a very liquid market. And if at some point you decide you want to sell homes, you feel very comfortable that there's a buyer, probably more so than any other kind of real estate you can invest in.

[Sarah Holder]

One 2024 working paper from the Federal Reserve bank of Philadelphia found that large financial firms went from owning almost no single family rental properties in 2010 to to almost 400,000 by 2021. But when interest rates went up in the middle of 2022, the industry's buying slowed. Last year, Blackstone's Tricon bought about 1400 homes and Pretium bought less than 600, according to the real estate investment data firm SFR Analytics. And when you think about the 15 million single family rental homes in the market, the share that's actually owned by these big players is pretty marginal.

[Patrick Clark]

Overall, it's somewhere between 500 and 600,000 homes. Those are estimates, but it's 3% or 4% of the total rental homes in the U.S. the total single family housing stock owner occupied or renter occupied, it's less than 1% of that. These are the numbers that industry's always liked to put out there and to say, listen, why are you guys targeting us? We're a very small part of the housing market.

[Sarah Holder]

In a statement to Bloomberg, Blackstone said its ownership of single family homes in the US represents 0.5% of the overall firm and that it's been a net seller of homes over the last decade, with the company's holdings down more than a fifth. But housing reporter Kristin Capps notes that in some parts of the country, institutional investors own a larger concentration of rental properties. And Atlanta is the starkest example of Wall Street's hold on housing.

[Kristin Capps]

Atlanta was hit harder than most metros during the great financial crisis, but it's also grown more than many metros since then. So that's provided both the opportunity and incentive for institutional buyers to invest. And now in metro Atlanta, more than 30% of the area's single family rental properties are owned by large corporations. Charlotte and Jacksonville come close as areas with maybe 25% ownership share by large corporations.

[Sarah Holder]

In those areas especially, it can be hard for regular home buyers to compete with institutional buyers who usually have more cash and sometimes use sophisticated algorithms to generate offers for homes.

[Kristin Capps]

One reason that homebuyers complain about institutional buyers is that algorithmic buying really locks out potential home buyers for institutional investors. As soon as something hits the the multiple listing service database for new homes that lines up with their area of specialization. These corporations can submit an all cash offer with no contingencies, no inspections over asking price. There's no household that can or would buy a home in that way.

[Sarah Holder]

Here's Bloomberg's Patrick Clark again.

[Patrick Clark]

You find yourself bidding against a company that can move more quickly and that's making buying decisions in a way that has no relation to the way your thinking about it. You know, what is this home going to yield on a yearly basis? And that's why, that's why people don't like them. That's why they've become popular or convenient targets.

[Sarah Holder]

Patrick says some firms argue that by turning these homes into rental properties, they're playing an important role in the housing ecosystem.

[Patrick Clark]

Some of their arguments are fair, right? It's like they at least particularly initially, but Even, you know, even still, if they buy an existing home, it's very often a home that needs some repair. They'll invest, you know, thousands or tens of thousands of dollars into fixing up the home and making it nicer. And, you know, what they would say is that they are then by doing that, giving a family that can't afford to buy access to a higher quality home in a better neighborhood with a better school district.

[Sarah Holder]

The research on how corporate landlords impact rental prices is mixed. Research from places like the Federal Reserve bank of Philadelphia have shown that larger landlords do drive higher rents, though there's disagreement about how significant those effects are on the market. Another working paper from CUNY Baruch suggests that by increasing rental supply, larger landlords can put downward pressure on rents. But investment firms entering real estate markets have other effects, too. Research compiled in a report by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and the center for Geospatial Solutions from studies in Boston, Atlanta and Kansas City found that corporate landlords were more likely to submit eviction filings than smaller landlords. In Memphis and Indianapolis, analyses show some corporate landlords had higher rates of code violations.

[Kristin Capps]

It's not necessarily the case that large landlords are worse than small landlords, but in the areas where they have been most active, there are fewer tenant protections. And in local or state law that afford tenants, you know, certain rights, certain ability to challenge landlord practices. And tenants in those places say that corporate landlords take advantage of these laws to raise rents, to provide substandard housing and to affect many households across the metro areas.

[Sarah Holder]

Trump's proposal to cut those landlords out is hitting at a really pivotal time. Housing feels increasingly out of reach for renters and buyers alike. And some Americans want someone to blame.

[Patrick Clark]

Affordability is the political issue of our, you know, of the moment, right? It feels unfair if you want to buy a house and you lose to a company. And it's just been red meat politically for years.

[Sarah Holder]

So could Trump be teeing himself up for a political win ahead of midterm elections this year? And would a ban provide meaningful change to the housing affordability picture that's coming up?

[Public Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from public. On public, you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets, which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI, it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated Assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Patrick Clark]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures these days it.

[Okta Advertiser]

Seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardy. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI Small businesses are the.

[Chase for Business Advertiser]

Pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level that makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business. They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn [e-mail] business chase for business make more of what's yours the Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase and.

[Sarah Holder]

Targeting private equity for its role in America's housing crisis has been, as Bloomberg's Patrick Clark called it, political red meat for a while now. It's an idea that politicians on both sides of the aisle have gotten behind.

[Chase for Business Advertiser]

Private equity firms, and other Wall street investors were busy scooping up homes in communities across the country, even in the middle of an historic housing shortage.

[Sarah Holder]

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren has been trying to regulate corporate landlords for years, says.

[Kristin Capps]

Bloomberg's Kristin Capps it's also something that former Vice President Kamala Harris advanced on the campaign trail.

[Sarah Holder]

We will make sure those homes actually go to working and middle class Americans, not just investing investors. Current Vice President J.D. vance has weighed in, too. Here he is on Columbus, Ohio's ABC6 in 2023.

[Patrick Clark]

They have access to lower interest rates.

[Kristin Capps]

They have access to cheaper money, and they completely crowd out the availability of homes for people who want to, you know, just buy, buy a piece of their community.

[Sarah Holder]

But it wasn't a given that Trump would take this on politically. It's worth noting Trump's donor base includes Stephen Schwartzman, the CEO of Blackstone. He's given generously to Trump's reelection campaign and his pac. And after Trump's Truth Social post, Blackstone's shares fell by as much as 9.3% before paring some losses.

[Patrick Clark]

I think the sell off in Blackstone shares doesn't make much sense. As Blackstone said on the day, you know, single family rentals are a very small piece of Blackstone's business in Blackstone has probably more important matters in front of the federal government.

[Sarah Holder]

And Patrick says many of the people he's spoken to in the single family rental industry have brushed off Trump's proposal.

[Patrick Clark]

As all talk say, this is just Trump being Trump. Half the stuff he says doesn't go anywhere. People have been talking about this forever and it's always just grandstanding and we don't have anything to worry about.

[Kristin Capps]

There are so few details that the President has provided about what it could potentially look like, what it would mean for there to be a ban. Is that a ban on purchasing? Is that a ban on ownership? Is that legal? I don't think that these questions have been fully played out.

[Patrick Clark]

There's at least five or six states that have proposed some version of this in the past, and they go at it a little differently. Sometimes they'll set a limit. If you own more than 1,000 homes or more than 2,000 homes, you can't buy anymore. I think there have been some bills that have approached the tax status of owners. In fact, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant said recently at the Economic Club of Minnesota that they're studying this. The thing that he said that people in the industry liked is that this is not a divestiture. They're not going to make companies sell homes they already own.

[Okta Advertiser]

Bygones are bygones.

[Patrick Clark]

We're not going to have a forced sale here.

[Sarah Holder]

Bessen's remarks also raise questions about which institutional investors this ban might apply to. Would it be targeted at the large firms who own thousands of homes or even smaller investors who own more like 12.

[Patrick Clark]

So we will decide what the correct level is.

[Kristin Capps]

Is it a dozen homes? Is it two dozen? What makes you an aggregator?

[Sarah Holder]

With the policy idea now on the table and Trump teasing more information to come at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos next week, some major players are taking potential regulation seriously.

[Patrick Clark]

The industry is in bargaining mode. They're talking amongst themselves and trying to come up with things that they can offer the administration in a potential deal. And they're hopeful that this is a transactional administration and there's something that can get done.

[Sarah Holder]

Because if legislation to ban institutional investors from the housing market makes its way through Washington, Patrick says it could have real bipartisan support and momentum behind it.

[Patrick Clark]

I think it's very likely that someone will introduce a bill. I think there's a pretty decent chance it'll pass, and I think that'll leave the landlords in the position of challenging the constitutionality of a ban.

[Sarah Holder]

But the other big question is whether tackling this issue will actually make it easier for people to buy and rent homes.

[Patrick Clark]

I would say in terms of sort of more mainline research, as I take it in, this is pretty low priority.

[Kristin Capps]

There's not many macroeconomists who are going to point to institutional buyers as a major factor in America's problems with housing affordability. Those major factors continue to be a lack of supply, a lack, lack of good options, in particular geographies. When it comes to homeownership. High interest rates are still the principal problem that buyers are struggling with.

[Sarah Holder]

Congress has proposed ways to address some of these other factors, like housing supply, in legislation like its Road to Housing act, which passed the Senate last year with bipartisan support, but was stripped from the defense spending bill that Trump signed in December. Now lawmakers and the House Financial Services Committee are trying to push forward another bipartisan housing package.

[Kristin Capps]

What Senator Elizabeth Warren told me is that the Trump administration has taken no moves to try to move the needle on the housing bill, the major housing bill that's been before Congress. And she said that she does not think that, you know, a stray, somewhat isolated post on social media really moves the ball or indicates that the Trump administration is focused on this issue.

[Sarah Holder]

For now, Wall street investors may just need to wait and see what Trump says next.

[Patrick Clark]

It's historically been an industry that likes to keep its head down and try to avoid attention. I think it's what's happening now is forcing at least some of the companies to step out and try to argue for themselves. And being such a small share of the housing market cuts both ways for these companies. On the one hand, they've often said, why are you guys worried about us? We're tiny. But as a potential ban gains some momentum, or if it gains momentum, you can kind of turn that idea around. And on some level, I think there are lawmakers who will say, why should I pick a fight with the President? You're tiny.

[Kristin Capps]

Foreign.

[Sarah Holder]

This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder. To get more from the Big Take and unlimited access to all of bloomberg.com subscribe [e-mail] podcastoffer thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.

[Okta Advertiser]

These days it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI this podcast is brought.

[Podcast Host / Wise Advertiser]

To you by Wise the Smarter way to manage your money internationally if you're getting a headache from juggling different currencies and different bank accounts in different countries, there's a better way to receive money in the currency you need without the slow transfer times or hidden fees. Meet Wise, the savvy way to handle your money internationally. Hold balances in up to 40 currencies with the mid market exchange rate on every conversion. Whether you're receiving payments from tenants abroad, earning as a digital nomad or con dividends from your international investments, the Wise Multi Currency account is for you. Be smart. Get Wise, Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com Terms and Conditions apply. With Valley from Ishares, you get access to both monthly income and growth potential in one simple ETF. It's the best of both worlds. Discover Bali iShares Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF iShares the market is yours. Visit www.ishares.com to view perspectives for investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing. Risks include principal loss and the use of derivatives, which could increase risks and volatility. Monthly income is not guaranteed. Prepared by BlackRock Investments, LLC.