Why Trump v. Cook Matters

Summary

---

The Big Take: Why Trump v. Cook Matters

Podcast: Big Take (Bloomberg & iHeartPodcasts)
Date: January 22, 2026
Host: Sarah Holder
Guests: Amera Amokwe (Bloomberg Federal Reserve reporter), Greg Storr (Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter)

---

Brief Overview

This episode of The Big Take delves into the Supreme Court case Trump v. Cook, a consequential legal battle centering on former President Donald Trump's unprecedented attempt to fire Lisa Cook, a sitting Federal Reserve governor. The discussion explores the core legal arguments, the potential consequences for U.S. monetary policy, Fed independence, market stability, and the broader context of presidential power. With expert guests who were present for the oral arguments, this episode provides listeners with a front-row look at a moment that could reshape the balance between politics and central banking in America.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Heart of the Case: Presidential Power vs. Fed Independence

• Background: President Trump, citing unproven allegations of mortgage fraud, attempted to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook via a post on Truth Social. Cook has denied these allegations and filed suit, arguing her removal would cause “irreparable harm” to the U.S. economy. Lower courts sided with Cook, allowing her to remain on the job as her legal fight continues.
• Legal Stakes (05:05–06:29):
  • Is a sitting Fed governor entitled to due process before dismissal?
  • Does the president have the authority to remove a Fed governor for allegations not proven in court?
  • What would be the broader impact on the Fed’s independence and market stability?

2. Unprecedented Attention: Supreme Court and Public Interest

• Noteworthy Attendance (03:31–03:36):
  “Former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke was there. So was current chair Jerome Powell.” — Sarah Holder
• Significance: The Fed and markets are watching closely, as are prominent officials, underlining the high stakes.

3. Core Legal Arguments Presented

• Lisa Cook’s Side (09:06–09:58):
  • Lack of procedural fairness—no opportunity to respond or defend herself.
  • Independence of the Fed at risk if governors can be fired at will by the president.
  • Quote (09:42):
    “It's less important that the president have full faith in every single governor, and it's more important that the markets and the public have faith in the independence of the Fed from the president and from Congress.”
    — Paul Clement, Cook’s lawyer
• Trump Administration’s Side (10:26–11:42):
  • Presidential authority is paramount, Fed jobs serve at the pleasure of the president.
  • Claim that Cook’s alleged misconduct makes her unfit to set interest rates.
  • Quote (11:42):
    “The American people should not have their interest rates determined by someone who was, at best, grossly negligent in obtaining favorable interest rates for herself.”

4. Concerns Voiced by Justices and Observers

• Fed Independence and Precedent (12:42–13:27):
  Justice Kavanaugh questioned the Solicitor General on the risk of starting a cycle where each new president could replace Fed governors at will, eroding independence:
  • Quote (13:07):
    “If this were set as a precedent... what goes around comes around. All the current president's appointees would likely be removed for cause on January 20, 2029, if there's a Democratic president.”
• Potential Court Leanings (13:50–14:41):
  • The justices seemed uneasy with granting the president unchecked latitude to dismiss Fed officials, suggesting a preference for at least minimal procedural protection or a narrow ruling to delay rather than decide definitively.

5. Potential Outcomes and Broader Implications

• If Trump Wins (18:38–20:05):
  • Would set a precedent for presidents to fire central bank governors at will.
  • Likely to erode investor confidence and make the Fed more susceptible to political influence.
  • Quote (18:38):
    “When a central bank is independent, it provides for better economic outcomes ... If you have a less independent Fed, maybe you have an economy that is less strong ... it would have implications for the US Dollar, ... stocks, ... treasuries ... a downward spiral if we see Fed independence eroded.” — Amera Amokwe
• If Cook Wins (20:20–21:19):
  • Fed governance remains stable, with court reaffirming the current protections against arbitrary removal.
  • Presidential authority remains strong elsewhere, but not over Federal Reserve appointments.

6. The Political and Market Context

• Ongoing DOJ Probe (04:07, 21:32–22:46):
  A concurrent criminal investigation into the Fed is further fueling tensions, with some Republicans now expressing unease over the president's aggressive tactics.
• Near-Term Uncertainty:
  The Supreme Court’s decision is pending and will likely arrive before the end of June or early July (23:00), while the Fed faces complex economic data and leadership uncertainty as President Trump considers new nominees for Chair (23:14–24:25).
• Quote (21:32):
  “...We haven't really seen much market reaction to some of these attacks... But now with this DOJ investigation, we did see a few Republicans come out and say this is going a little too far. We kind of need to pull this back.” — Amera Amokwe

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• Fed Independence in the Spotlight:
  “The fact that [Powell] showed up, I think did send a message about how important he sees it as being, especially after that rather extraordinary statement that he gave the other night about the criminal investigation involving him.” — Greg Storr (04:07)
• The Broader Precedent:
  “It's more important that the markets and the public have faith in the independence of the Fed...” — Paul Clement (09:42)
• Justice Kavanaugh’s Warning:
  “What goes around comes around. All the current president's appointees would likely be removed ... if there's a Democratic president.” (13:07)
• Why This Case Matters:
  “...if you have a less independent Fed ... perhaps they aren't going to be willing to take those unpopular steps when necessary. And then maybe you have an economy that is less strong.” — Amera Amokwe (18:38)

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• 02:25: Introduction & summary of Trump’s firing attempt
• 03:14–03:36: High-level observers at the hearing (Bernanke, Powell)
• 05:05: Recap of legal proceedings so far
• 06:29: Key legal questions at stake
• 09:06–09:58: Lisa Cook’s legal argument and Fed independence
• 10:26–11:42: Trump admin’s argument and justices’ skepticism
• 12:34–13:27: Justice Kavanaugh’s question on precedent and Fed independence
• 13:50–14:41: Gret Storr on apparent disposition of the court
• 17:41–18:26: Recent Supreme Court precedent on removal power
• 18:38–20:05: Implications of eroded Fed independence
• 21:32–22:46: Political checks and DOJ investigation
• 23:00–23:14: Timing of Supreme Court decision
• 23:14–24:25: What’s next for the Fed and its leadership

---

Conclusion

This episode frames Trump v. Cook as a pivotal test of both presidential authority and the Federal Reserve’s independence. With legal, economic, and political ramifications at play, the outcome will shape not only the power dynamics within the U.S. government but also global confidence in America’s central bank. The Supreme Court is poised to make a historic decision, one that will be watched intently from Washington to Wall Street and beyond.

---

Transcript

[Public.com Advertiser]

Support for the show comes from public on public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Public.com Legal Disclaimer]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures these days it.

[Okta Advertiser]

Seems like AI agents are just about everywhere. You turn every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

[Chase Business Advertiser]

Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools. Plus access online resources designed to help your business thrive online. Learn [e-mail] business chase for business make more of what's yours the Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase Co. Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News.

[Sarah Holder]

President Donald Trump achieved reality TV fame by telling contestants on the apprent two infamous words, you're fired. And on Wednesday, those words were at the center of a Supreme Court case that could have big implications for the global economy and the independence of the US Central bank.

[My Policy Advocate Advertiser]

Just a meeting across a conference table. Finished with you're fired.

[Sarah Holder]

I mean, that was supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, speaking as the court heard arguments over one of Trump's latest attempted firings.

[Greg Storr]

President Trump says he's removing Fed Governor.

[Amera Amokwe]

Lisa Cook effective immediately.

[Okta Advertiser]

He cites allegations that she committed mortgage.

[Sarah Holder]

Fraud, which she denies.

[Chase Business Advertiser]

No president has fired a sitting Governor.

[Sarah Holder]

In the 112 year History of the Fed. Bloomberg reporter Amera Amokwe, who covers the Federal Reserve, was in the room.

[Amera Amokwe]

This was my first time at a Supreme Court hearing. I mean, it's not every day that a Fed related matter comes before the Supreme Court. And, you know, when all the reporters walked into the room, we were all kind of just kind of stretching our necks to see who was in sort of the public part of the room.

[Sarah Holder]

Former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke was there. So was current chair Jerome Powell.

[Greg Storr]

It is pretty noteworthy that Jay Powell came to this argument.

[Sarah Holder]

Greg Storr is a Supreme Court reporter for Bloomberg who's been following Cook's case.

[Greg Storr]

Up until very recently. Jay Powell has tried to remain studiously neutral in this case. The Fed itself has not been taking a position in this case.

[Sarah Holder]

Wednesday's hearing came just over a week after federal prosecutors served grand jury subpoenas to the central bank over renovations at its headquarters and congressional testimony Powell gave about that project.

[Greg Storr]

The fact that he showed up, I think did send a message about how important he sees it as being, especially after that rather extraordinary statement that he gave the other night about the criminal investigation involving him.

[Okta Advertiser]

No one, certainly not the chair of.

[My Policy Advocate Advertiser]

The Federal Reserve, is above the law.

[Okta Advertiser]

But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure.

[Amera Amokwe]

That is a remarkable departure from the posture that Chair Powell and the Fed have taken towards all of the attacks that President Trump has directed at them since he returned to office last year. And so I think it raises the stakes in the Lisa Cook case.

[My Policy Advocate Advertiser]

Right.

[Amera Amokwe]

Because if the justices signal that it is in a way easier to remove a Fed governor than has been thought of in the past, then it could be open season on any Fed governor.

[Sarah Holder]

I'm Sarah Holder and this is the big take from Bloomberg News. Today on the show, Bloomberg reporters Amera Amokwe and Greg Storr take us inside the Supreme Court for Trump v. Cook. We take a look at the arguments from both sides and unpack what a ruling could mean for Fed independence, for the economy and for Trump. President Trump tried to fire Lisa Cook 8 months ago In a letter posted on Truth Social. Almost immediately, she sued the president, saying his effort to fire her could cause irreparable harm. To the US Economy. A district court sided with Cook, saying she could remain on the job while she continues to challenge Trump's attempt.

[Amera Amokwe]

That decision then went to the appellate level and the appeals court said the same thing, essentially sided with Lisa Cook that she could stay on the job while she fights to stay on the job permanently. And so then the administration went to the Supreme Court, and that is how we landed there today.

[Sarah Holder]

But this isn't a typical Supreme Court case. It's on the court's emergency docket. It came about after the Trump administration filed an emergency application asking the court to let them remove Cook immediately, even as a legal fight continues. And what's the fundamental question that the judges are being asked to consider here? What is this case really about?

[Greg Storr]

So you've basically got two things that Lisa Cook is arguing. One, she says I can't be fired without some sort of process, more than just a social media post, which is how she was notified that Trump was trying to remove her. And so there's a question of is she entitled to a chance to make her case before she's removed? And then the bigger question is, even if these allegations are true, and the allegations are that she engaged in mortgage fraud, she denies that vehemently. And her lawyer said at most it was inadvertent. Even if those are true, is that enough grounds for the president to fire her? So that's sort of the issues in the backdrop. And then because it is coming to the court in the context of an emergency application, not looking for a final ruling, the court is also thinking about what would be the consequences in the short term of, say, letting Trump fire her for the time being. And they're thinking about things like what would the impact on the markets be? What would the impact on Fed independence be? So there are kind of non legal factors that are at least in the air in this argument.

[Sarah Holder]

Amera, how central were those broader questions going into these oral arguments about not just the question of whether or not Trump has the power to fire or remove Lisa Cook, but the questions around presidential authority and the future of the Fed?

[Amera Amokwe]

As someone who covers the Fed, I mainly talk to Fed watchers and economists. I don't think that they're necessarily focused on sort of the nitty gritty legal details. Everyone is kind of thinking about the broader context, which is that the attempt to fire Lisa Cook comes amid the Trump administration's and the president's really effort to try to have more influence over the Fed and try to have more influence over monetary policy. The president has made clear that he wants to nominate a Fed chair to replace Jerome Powell when his term is up, a Fed chair who will cut interest rates drastically. He has pressured the Fed from several different sides. And so I think Fed watchers are looking at this and saying if the president is able to remove Lisa Cook over an unproven mortgage fraud allegation, that would essentially erode this job protection that Fed governors enjoy in a way that would really then erode Fed independence and the ability of the Fed to set interest rates free of political pressure.

[Sarah Holder]

With that backdrop, I want to walk through the actual arguments that the court heard this week. So let's start with Cook, the plaintiff in this case. Greg, what was at the center of her lawyer's argument to the court?

[Greg Storr]

We will hear argument this morning in case 25A312, Trump versus Cook. Well, there's essentially are two prongs. The notion that she was not given any process, not given a chance to make her case that any problems with the mortgage applications were inadvertent. And secondly, that this allegation is not enough for the president to fire her. Coupled with that, the lawyer for Lisa Cook, Paul Klebent, was also talking about the impact on Fed independence.

[Paul Clement]

It's less important that the president have full faith in every single governor, and it's more important that the markets and the public have faith in the independence of the Fed from the president and from Congress.

[Greg Storr]

You know, this is something the Supreme Court has suggested earlier it cares about. And so trying to make the case that whatever you think about those legal questions, at the end of the day, of the day, just be really careful about doing something in this case that would shatter that Fed independence.

[Sarah Holder]

And Greg, what about the lawyers arguing in favor of President Trump? How did they counter that argument in front of the justices?

[Greg Storr]

So U.S. solicitor General John Sauer, who's the top Supreme Court lawyer for the Trump administration, had multiple levels to his argument. One level was, hey, the Supreme Court has no business here. This is something the president has total authority over, total discretion. That didn't get him very far too. He said, on that issue of process. He said, first, Lisa Cook doesn't have any property, right in this job. She's not due any process because she's not entitled to this job. He also said that even if she is entitled to some process, she got plenty. She was told publicly that she was being fired and she has not responded, in his view, in any adequate way to those allegations. And that also met some resistance. Justice Barrett asking, you know, why would it be so hard to give her a hearing.

[Sarah Holder]

One step you could take to reduce your irreparable harm, to show that there.

[Greg Storr]

Really was cause, is just to have a hearing. Why not? I don't think it's a question of resource allocation. It's our position that adequate process was already provided. And then finally he made the argument that if these allegations are true, this is not somebody we want setting interest rates. It means that it's somebody untrustworthy.

[Public.com Advertiser]

The American people should not have their interest rates determined by someone who was, at best, grossly negligent in obtaining favorable interest rates for herself.

[Greg Storr]

And that was sort of where the justices had the harder time, because that's kind of a judgment call that they seemed reluctant to get too deep into to try to figure out whether these allegations were the kind of things that were serious enough that the President ought to be allowed to fire her for.

[Sarah Holder]

Cause and whether they were material to how she does her job and whether she fulfills her responsibilities in the right way.

[Greg Storr]

Exactly. These are allegations about things that happened before she became a Fed governor. And there was a question of, given that it's not something that was happening while she's doing the job, is it something that is of lesser importance?

[Sarah Holder]

And, Amera, how did the justices respond to these arguments? What were you seeing in the room about what they were paying attention to and asking about?

[Amera Amokwe]

Well, I thought one of the most notable moments was when Justice Kavanaugh questioned Sauer about Fed independence. And he basically started that line of questioning, asking him, why is Fed independence important? And then he went on to basically talk about how, you know, a decision to remove Lisa Cook could essentially create a slippery slope where you have a cycle where presidents continuously kind of remove governors at will.

[My Policy Advocate Advertiser]

Because if this were set as a precedent, it seems to me just thinking, big picture, what goes around comes around. All the current president's appointees would likely be removed for cause on January 20, 2029, if there's a Democratic president.

[Amera Amokwe]

That was a point in the hearing where you saw people kind of perk up because it kind of got to the heart of the matter, the thing that we've all been thinking about, which is the question of Fed independence.

[Sarah Holder]

I mean, to tie this all together. Greg, after hearing these arguments and the justices responses, what's your sense of where the justices are leaning on this case as a body or individually?

[Greg Storr]

It sure seemed like. And not just a 5 Justice majority, but a larger majority was really concerned about the prospect of what it would mean if the court sided with Donald Trump and let him fire her. At least right away. What seems like the big question now is the court going to issue a narrow ruling that just kicks the can down the road a little bit and maybe it comes back to them? A ruling maybe that says, hey, she's got to have some sort of opportunity to be heard before you fire her? Or do they do something broader that says allegations of these sort are not the kind of things that let a president remove a Fed governor. That would give much deeper protection for Fed governors going forward. That would be a very big deal. Whether the court is ready to go there yet, that's not clear.

[Sarah Holder]

Up next, what prior rulings by the court could tell us about where the justices might land this time and just how big the stakes are for Trump, for the Fed and for the US Economy.

[4imprint Advertiser]

Finding the right promotional products can feel overwhelming. But with 4imprint it can be easy. They call it 4imprint certainty, which means the process is stress free, straightforward and backed by real peace of mind. Not sure what promo products to order? No problem. You can get free samples, product guidance, even free help with your logo so everything can meet your expectations. Need options? They've got thousands, including branded apparel, drinkware, outdoor and all the tradeshow essentials. And when your order arrives, it's backed by their 360 degree guarantee. That's four imprints promise your order will be packed with care, show up looking great and right on time in a rush. 4imprint has quick turnaround options too to help you hit your deadline. Whether you're prepping for an event or just refreshing your promo lineup, 4imprint helps you get it done. Head to forimprint.com to explore that's 4imprint.com 4imprint for certain, support for the show.

[Public.com Advertiser]

Comes from public on public. You can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Public.com Legal Disclaimer]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member Finra and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures these days it.

[Okta Advertiser]

Seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

[Sarah Holder]

This isn't the first time the Supreme Court has been asked to weigh in on President Trump's power to fire top officials at independent federal agencies. Last year, the court ruled in his favor, allowing him to oust officials at the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. But notably, it exempted the Federal Reserve from that decision. It was an indication that the court was prioritizing Fed independence, an argument that Lisa Cook's lawyer Paul Clement, invoked on Wednesday.

[Paul Clement]

You know, there's a reason that monetary policy has been treated differently for, you know, these many years, and there's a reason that the markets watch the Fed a little more closely than they watch, really, any other agency of government.

[Sarah Holder]

So I asked Bloomberg Fed reporter Amera Amokwe to walk me through what it would mean if the court decided to rule in Trump's favor this time and allow the president to fire a Fed governor in this way.

[Amera Amokwe]

If you talk to any mainstream economist, when a central bank is independent, it provides for better economic outcomes. It reassures investors, it reassures the public that a central bank like the Fed is willing to take decisions that may be unpopular to produce the best economic outcomes, particularly when it comes to inflation. Right? So a good example is in the wake of the pandemic, we had an inflationary surge in the United States, and the Fed raised interest rates aggressively to combat that. Painful for Americans, but necessary to push back against inflation. Right. And the Fed was able to do that because it is an independent institution. Institution. And it doesn't have to worry about the political ramifications of taking unpopular steps. And so the idea is that if you have a less independent Fed, if you have a board of governors where people can be fired basically at will by the president, then perhaps they aren't going to be willing to take those unpopular steps when necessary. And then maybe you have an economy that is less strong. You have an economy where inflation is not well controlled. And that in turn erodes confidence that investors both here and abroad have in the US Economy and our assets. So it would have implications for the US Dollar, it would have implications for US Stocks, it would have implications for US Treasuries. And so economists warn of basically a downward spiral if we see Fed independence eroded.

[Sarah Holder]

And Greg, let's play out the other possible scenario here. If the court rules against Trump, as perhaps seems more likely after these oral arguments, where does that put the president more broadly? How big of a loss is that?

[Greg Storr]

It's significant. But keep in mind, this is a Supreme Court that over the last year in particular, has done a lot of things to expand presidential authority. And so in the non Fed context, the court is still giving him very broad power to fire other people in the federal government when he wants to. But in terms of the Fed, it means that the Fed continues as we've known it for the most part. It means that even though they'll still be subject to political pressure, the bully pulpit, the president will be, you know, no doubt still talking about you should lower interest rates. He's going to have the ability to appoint a new chair and other members going forward. But in terms of where the Fed stands legally, it will be basically where it has always stood, which is once members are appointed and confirmed by the Senate, unless they do something really, really wrong, they are there throughout their term.

[Sarah Holder]

And against this backdrop, Amera, the decision that we're waiting for seems quite high stakes. But I'm wondering, you know, you've described the Supreme Court as the Fed's last line of defense in the past. Are there other lines?

[Amera Amokwe]

Well, prior to us learning about the DOJ investigation, it really had been the Supreme Court with their initial sort of decision to allow Lisa Cook to remain on the job. That was kind of the first time we saw any of Washington's kind of institutions come to the Fed's defense. Because really, Republicans in Congress, since they control both chambers of Congress, have been very reticent to sort of push back on all the attacks from the Trump administration on the Fed. We haven't really seen much market reaction to some of these attacks. You know, last year, over the spring and early summer, Trump was sort of talking about firing Chair Powell. We didn't see much of a market reaction. After he said he was firing Lisa Cook, we didn't see much of a market reaction. And so the idea that the markets act as a check on President Trump wasn't really applicable in the case of the Fed, we didn't really see much market reaction. But now with this DOJ investigation, we did see a few Republicans come out and say this is going a little too far. We kind of need to pull this back. And so I think this investigation is being seen as sort of a more serious threat, in part because it is a criminal investigation than some of the other sort of attacks that we've seen from the Trump administration.

[Sarah Holder]

And Greg, I also want to understand what comes next. This is on the court's emergency docket. So what does that actually mean for when and whether we'll get a conclusive ruling on whether or not Lisa Cook can be removed from her post as Fed governor?

[Greg Storr]

The only thing I can say with a lot of confidence is that it will come out sometime before the term ends, which is typically end of June, very early July.

[Sarah Holder]

And Amira, what's next for the Fed as they await this decision?

[Amera Amokwe]

There's a lot going on. So we have a Fed meeting next week where Fed officials are widely expected to hold interest rates steady after cutting three consecutive times at the end of last year. And so Fed officials are actually dealing with a pretty complicated economic picture on top of everything else because they are trying to figure out what's happening in the labor market and what's happening with inflation, which are kind of pulling their policy choices in kind of opposite directions. So there's a complicated economic backdrop that they're dealing with. The other big thing that's happening is that President Trump is weighing who he wants to pick for Fed chair. Chair Jerome Powell's term is up in May, and President Trump is considering mainly four candidates and that his whole selection process has been complicated. But by this DOJ investigation, because you now have some Republicans who are pushing back against that and saying that they will not advance any of President Trump's Fed nominees until that situation is resolved. So there's a question of who Trump will pick to be Fed chair and how easily that person will be able to be confirmed.

[Sarah Holder]

This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder. To get more from the Big Take and unlimited access to all of bloomberg.com, subscribe [e-mail] podcastoffer thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.

[Okta Advertiser]

These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities. Giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI with four Imprint Finding.

[4imprint Advertiser]

The right promo products can be easy. They call it four Imprint Certainty, which means you get free samples, expert help, art assistance, and their assurance your logo looks great. 4imprint offers thousands of options to choose from, including branded apparel, drinkware, outdoor and more. And it's backed by their 360 degree guarantee. That's 4imprint's promise that your order will be packed with care and delivered on time. Need your order faster? 4imprint offers quick turnaround options, too. Visit4imprint.com to explore for Imprint for certain, here's a paradox.

[My Policy Advocate Advertiser]

We buy insurance for peace of mind. Yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened. The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair. But in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered. The policyholder rarely does. That's where my policy advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable. They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency, giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades. Because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let my policy advocate tell you what it really says. Visit mypolicyadvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth. Mypolicyadvocate.com.