Transcript
Big Technology Podcast Host (0:00)
Does the AI business have what it takes to survive? Our guest today says no. That's coming up right after this. Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool headed and nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. We're joined today by Ed Zitron. He's the owner of ezpr, the host of Better Offline, and the author of the where's your Ed at? Newsletter. He's here to speak with us about his criticism of the AI business and why it may all soon collapse. Ed, great to see you. Welcome to the show.
Ed Zitron (0:30)
Great to see you. Thank you for having me.
Big Technology Podcast Host (0:31)
Okay, so we, we've had some very different varieties of critics on the show. We've had people who've said it's poisoning society. We've had people like Gary Marcus who've said that the progress is gone. We've had in various iterations, folks who've talked about how it can be used by bad actors to do things like enhance viruses. Soon we'll have someone who's gonna come on to talk about escape risk. But you are in a different category. You really think that the business of OpenAI and, and the AI industry is unsustainable? Yeah, this is something we talk about a lot on the show. I'm very familiar with your work and it's great to have you here to discuss it.
Ed Zitron (1:10)
Yeah, it's just all very silly when you look at it. Right now we are sitting there. The most important company in AI is OpenAI. They will burn probably 12, $13 billion after revenue this year. That's based on projections. They also have no path to profitability. They don't have one. They claim 20. The information's reported a few times, like 20, 29, 20, 30. They're going to magically become profitable due to Stargate. Now how will that happen? Nobody actually knows. And Open AI will not tell us because OpenAI doesn't really discuss their revenues other than in really vague ways that go like, we have 3 billion business users. What's that about? When you look at the underlying finances, it's genuinely insane. And it's more insane outside of open AI. The information also reported the Microsoft will only make about $13 billion. Not profit, just revenue on AI this year. 10 billion of that is OpenAI's Azure Cloud spend. 3 billion is them selling Coppola. That's an insanely small amount, man. 3 billion is not a lot of money in the grand scheme of things. They do like 11, 19 billion dollars in profit a quarter and this is on 50, 70 billion dollars of capital expenditures. These numbers are terrible. There's an analyst, it's quoted by Laura Bratton at Yahoo Finance, who said that he only thinks that Amazon is going to make $5 billion in revenue again, not profit this year on AI, they are spending $105 billion in capital expenditures. This is an insane situation. And the fact that I am ever framed as radical or like a pessimist when I'm just doing very basic mathematics, it's kind of strange. I think it says something a lot about media in general, but also the tech industry in general. And people will say, oh, well, Uber lost a bunch of money. Give it the fuck up on that one. Uber lost a ton of money in 2020. They lost like $6.2 billion. I think their worst year on record was like an $8 billion loss. But they had a product and then they used it to fuck over labor forces like they used it to. They just dragged those numbers down. But nevertheless, fundamentally different business and also not a big company. Not. Uber is not the face of the savior of the tech industry because that's what generative AI needs to be now. It needs to be bigger than the smartphone market. It's about 450, 500 billion a year, bigger than the enterprise software market, about 250 billion. What the. The current combined revenue of all the generative AI companies is like, and that's including the big tech companies, is about 35, 40 billion dollars. It's insane, man. It's insane. And eventually this has to stop. It has. The growth is not there.
