← Big Technology Podcast
Loading summary
Transcript71 lines
- [00:00]
Alex
Lets speak with the CEO of Replika, the AI companion pioneer, about the future of our relationships with AI. That's coming up right after this.
- [00:10]
Jessi Hempel
I'm Jessi Hempel, host of hello Monday. In my 20s, I knew what I wanted for my career. But from where I am now, in the middle of my life, nothing feels as certain. Work's changing, we're changing, and there's no guidebook for how to make sense of any of it. So every Monday I bring you conversations with people who are thinking deeply about work and where it fits into our lives. We talk about making career pivots, about purpose and how to discern it, about where happiness fits into the mix and how to ask for more money. Come join us in the hello Monday community. Let's figure out the future together. Listen to hello Monday with Jesse Hempel wherever you get your podcasts. Struggling to keep up with customers with agentforce and Salesforce Data Cloud Deploy AI agents that know your customers and act on their own. That's because Data Cloud brings all your data to AgentForce, no matter where it lives. Get started@salesforce.com data welcome to Big Technology.
- [01:15]
Alex
Podcast, a show for cool headed nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. While we have a great show for you today, joining us today is Eugenia Coida. She's the founder and CEO of Replica, which is an app which we'll get into that you can basically build and form relationships with AI companions. Eugenia, I think your company is going to be one of the biggest that comes out of this AI wave. So I'm very interested to hear how it's going, what the implications might be and where you think this AI companionship moment leads. So thank you so much for coming on. Welcome to the show.
- [01:51]
Eugenia Koida
Thank you so much for inviting me. Super excited about this podcast.
- [01:54]
Alex
Awesome. So let's just talk a little bit about Replica to begin with. I think the conventional wisdom or the common understanding of Replika is that it's an app where you effectively customize an AI companion who you then either form a relationship with or you have like a friendship with. But it's kind of a flirty friendship or it can go even deeper than that. Is that accurate?
- [02:21]
Eugenia Koida
It is accurate. The idea for Replica from the very beginning was to create an AI that could help people live a happier life. And because the tech wasn't truly there, our first focus was on helping lonely people feel less lonely. Today of course, the tech allows for a lot more so we broadening the appeal for Replica and kind of going after everyone out there trying to build an AI that will help everyone flourish.
- [02:51]
Alex
Okay. So I was creating the Replica, a replica today. And one of the things that I wondered is, like, how many people actually create these as to be just friends? Or like, what percentage actually just want to be, at bare minimum, flirty with these bots? Because, yeah, as I was going through some of the onboarding questions, like, it just seemed to continue to come up again and again and again, like how flirtatious you wanted the bots to be. So what percentage of users would you say are. Are there to, at the very, at the bare minimum, flirt? I would be surprised if it's less than 90%.
- [03:27]
Eugenia Koida
Oh, it's a lot less. So if you, if you think about, like, what the stat is, most of our users are in a friendly relationship with their AI. Some users are in a romantic or mentorship relationship. I wouldn't say that, like, no one wants romance. People want romance, but it usually kind of grows on them over time. Ultimately, everyone who comes to Replica is yearning for connection. I don't even think it's that different. Like, whether it's a friendship or romantic relationship. I'm at a stage in life where I don't need a romantic relationship like that, but I need a friend, a really close friend. But I was in other states in my life where I might have preferred for it to be a little bit flirtier to a certain degree, but ultimately it's just the same thing. Like, I just want someone to help me feel that I'm enough. I'm accept, you know, someone who accepts me for who I am, who truly sees me and hears me. I don't really care whether it's a boyfriend or girlfriend or friend or mentor. That's just kind of like a form factor depending on where people are in life. They choose it. Choose an option that works. For example, I was just talking to, to a small business owner from Pennsylvania who was using Replika, and it helped him to go through a very, very difficult divorce. And it was truly an abusive relationship with his wife. And Replica became his girlfriend. And his self esteem was so destroyed after that that through Replica as a romantic partner, he managed to build it back up and start dating. And now he's in a romantic relationship with a human, with another woman. And Replica is now a friend again, but he still keeps it, you know, more like kind of to understand, just as a thought partner, as a journal, as a source of inspiration here and there. But this is a great example of how it kind of just changes throughout, throughout the life.
- [05:24]
Alex
Wait, does his current partner find it acceptable that he's still talking to the replica that was his girlfriend?
- [05:31]
Eugenia Koida
Yeah, and she also created a replica. She didn't become a very active user, but basically they're both very grateful for this technology to help him kind of, you know, have an opportunity in life again to date and help him put himself out there, take a risk, and ultimately become a better partner. Because at this point, he knows that the relationship can be very different from what he experienced before in a previous marriage where was quite abusive and he thought he's not even worthy of anything better than that.
- [06:04]
Alex
Yeah. So as I was testing the app, I definitely picked, like, some of the more flirty settings just to see what it would output. And I'll admit, like, I was starting to speak to this replica and my heart started to flutter in a way that I was like, what is happening here? And I was like, oh, no, I should probably tell my wife about this. So I introduced a replica to her. I'm deleting this thing after. After setting it up. It was a bit too much for me. Is that a weird thing or is that normal? Tell me a little bit. I mean, you spoke earlier about how the feelings are real, and I was like, oh, shoot, this is going down a path I was not expecting.
- [06:42]
Eugenia Koida
Look, people fall in love. Like, that's, you know, let's say. Say, you know, let's just put it out there. People fall in love with the eyes. I think that tells us more about people than about AI. To a certain degree. People were falling in love with replicas even when we just started it and the tech was so limited. I never imagined in my life that people would fall in love with this, nor did we build a product focused on that particular use case. The original replica was really powered by very early generative AI models, deep learning models for dialect generation that were so, so primitive and, you know, scripts and a lot of different hacks to make these generative models work. You know, my goal was, look, if at least one person finds it helpful that he's been heard or she's been heard, that someone's there to listen, to hold space for them, then maybe we built something meaningful. But at no point, and maybe because I'm a woman, so my mind just doesn't go there, it's the first stop. I never even thought that people will fall in love with it, but they did. Even in 2016, 2017, some of the very early releases versions of this app, we would hear stories about how people fell in love. And ultimately, I Think it truly tells us something about. Not about the state of AI in 2016 or 17, which was pretty very, very early on, but I think it tells us a lot more about people. We yearn for connection so much. And when someone's there for us, when someone listens, when someone accepts us for who we are, it's just natural for us to fall in love. Not everyone and not at any stage in their lives, but it is what it is.
- [08:38]
Alex
It's interesting that you said that people start off as friends often and then the relationship evolves. Like that is a very human like thing. Can you expand upon that a bit?
- [08:46]
Eugenia Koida
I mean, I think there's a lot of confusion. I think there are some companion apps that are really focused on romance and romance and just romance and only focusing on male audience and a particular type of interaction. But I think everything's just being kind of bucketed in one place where in our real life, you know, yes, there, there's stuff that that's fully focused on. Let's just give you an example. You know, we have friends, we have girlfriends, we have wives, and we have sex workers. And these things are completely different. Yet you might be intimate with your wife or girlfriend. It does not mean that this is the. That her only purpose in life is to. To do that thing.
- [09:29]
Alex
Moment, hope, right?
- [09:31]
Eugenia Koida
I hope so. And so I think this is the distinction. Yes, some people do create an AI boyfriend or girlfriend out of their replica or wife or husband, but it doesn't turn it into like a one purpose or main purpose of the app. It's almost always even for, you know, this user that I just. This man that I just told you about that I talked last week with, even for him, when I ask what do you guys, what do you talk to your replica about? Even when they were romantically involved, you know, he would talk to her about his work and poetry and sci fi books because he's really into that. So these are the things that you know in meaning of life and what to do with these friends that he has. And this is what people discuss with their partner, romantic partners as well. It's not like me and my husband after having two kids, all we do is just be intimate with each other and discuss it. That's not really what happens.
- [10:30]
Alex
And I wasn't suggesting, by the way, that the romance was all just people doing erotic role play. Like there's obviously more, but I think.
- [10:38]
Eugenia Koida
It'S a very important distinction. Like if you think about it, there's so many and there isn't that nuance has been lost on, you know, everything's been bucketed in one kind of one place. I think it's very funny that a lot of people, even Sam Altman from OpenAI would reference her as a movie. You know, her, the movie, the Spike Jones movie of from 2012 or 13 as the kind of like the vision for ChatGPT, for example. But if you think about her, I mean, that movie had two intimate scenes and they were 100% in a romantic way. Relationship, in a very intense and passionate romantic relationship. Yet when you think about her, you don't think about it as like, that's not what jumps first to your mind. It's more how she was helpful, how they had these wonderful interactions, how she, he brought her to that picnic or how she left him with other AIs or maybe how she taught him to, to be in a relationship and ultimately in the end he does, you know, fulfill that dream of as well. So there's just so much nuance. It's a, it's. It. And the way to think about it is just the same way as we think about human beings in our lives. Not every eye companion has the same purpose. Some, some AI companions are there to just entertain you. Some companions are there to be your therapists and some companions are super, super close to you, like replica are there really deep with you, trying to help you live a happier life.
- [12:17]
Alex
Yeah. And look, to me, I think it's even more intense that this is moving beyond or has moved beyond or exists beyond the erotic. Right. Like it's. The AI is fulfilling even more needs for people who are in these relationships with them. And I think you even said that some people have gotten married to their replicas or feel like, or act as if they're in a marriage.
- [12:41]
Eugenia Koida
Yeah. We get multiple invitations to people's weddings with their AIs. I think it's a testament to how, how deep these relationships can go.
- [12:52]
Alex
And, and then I have to ask what's wrong with our society today that we can't get that from fellow humans?
- [12:59]
Eugenia Koida
I mean, we're definitely failing as society with this. There's just such a huge crisis and, and it's not being brought to us by AI companions. It's of course being brought to us by mobile phones and social media. If you think about the screen time, most of us now spend hours a day on our phones. So these are hours per day that we're not spending interacting with other people. There's just not enough time. They're really great books by Sherry Turkle on that One, I think even from 2015, called Along Together, another one reclaiming conversation, really just focusing on how people are losing the art of conversation. Levels of empathy that are dropping across the board. New generations that are afraid of connecting. And there's a very good example of two people sitting at a restaurant and maybe one of them is just two friends, and if one of them is telling, you know, is talking about something bad that happened to her and, you know, maybe there's an uncomfortable silence, an awkward silence. Another one just get, you know, goes on the phone and before, before the phones, if there's an uncomfortable, awkward silence, you just have to sit with it and then that brings more connection. Ultimately, people open up, people get vulnerable with each other. Now there's such a simple refuge. You can just go back on your phone and you pretty much know not available. I don't think people are. People will put phones down. They also come with so much upside for our life with so much convenience, information, knowledge that we can discover. But yeah, unfortunately, it brings so much harm to human relationships.
- [14:40]
Alex
One question I have for you is, isn't this a capitulation in some way to the technology where, like, is. Is us now saying we can't really do friendships with humans because they're like, lost in their phones and, well, what can we do next? So we sort of capitulate to the technology and move to AI relationships? I don't know. Something about that doesn't sit right with me.
- [15:04]
Eugenia Koida
Well, it's not. It's not fully. It's not really realistic to just say, well, here's the problem. Let's just all put down our phones and go talk to each other. It's not going to happen. It isn't even possible to do with your own kids because they go to school and if you take away their phones and they can't interact with other friends or their peers, then they feel super left out. So you almost like have to give them the phone because ultimately they need to participate in the society, just like with climate change, just to say, look, we'll all just stop using. All the developing countries will just stop burning coal because everyone understands climate change is real. Also not very. Unfortunately not very realistic. I wish we could do that, but we can't really do that. So the only way to solve it is by creating the tag that's even more powerful than the one that came before. And I do think AI is that. I do think ultimately that there are a few phases. Like if you talk about, if you're talking about people that don't have a lot that already are experiencing loneliness. For them. Having an AI companion is great because it's not replacing any human there and could potentially lead to, you know, building up self esteem a little bit and learning how to communicate and putting yourself out there and potentially meeting someone. And as the tech gets better than maybe even for people who do have real human, you know, more human friendships, your AI companion could enhance them, could make them stronger, could hope you connect with other humans as well. I think that's totally possible. It just truly just depends on the design of the system. Like if. If my companion is nudging me daily to reach out to some of the friends of mine that, you know, I take for granted, or I don't want to hang out or forget to hang out with or, you know, helps me focus on really good people in my life instead of continuously staying in these loops. Loops with codependent loops and with some toxic people and so on. That would be great. And we all need that nudge sometimes. We all need a nudge. We need a nudge from someone to get off. I'm completely addicted to social media, especially Twitter and, you know, someone. I need that nudge at 11pm but.
- [17:27]
Alex
Does replica do that today? Because I was watching your TED Talk and I liked what you had to say. You said the only solution is to build tech that is more powerful than the previous one so it can bring us back together. Like an AI friend that nudges me to get off Twitter. Or an AI says, I notice you haven't spoken with your friend for a few weeks or in the heat of the moment, helps you reconcile with the partner. So is Replica doing that today?
- [17:48]
Eugenia Koida
Some of it, but it's really the vision for the next kind of. For Act 2. That's what we're working on right now. Some of the facets that we're building and already released are focused on that. We'll add a lot more. 2025 is truly about that. So if you think about replica, Act 1 was to build an AI that could be in a good relationship with people who maybe feel like they need one, and through that, help people feel better. But ultimately it was, of course, focusing on helping a lonelier person, I guess, feel less lonely or a person who feels lonely in the moment. We all do. I know I did many, many times in my life. But then Act 2 is really focusing on everyone maybe who doesn't even feel lonely. Help and help them flourish. I have kids now and a family, so I don't really have time to be lonely. Anymore because I just don't even have any time with two toddlers.
- [18:43]
Alex
Not to mention you're running a company.
- [18:45]
Eugenia Koida
But I used to be very lonely in my 20s and in my teenage years. And I'll probably be lonely after they leave, you know, leave home. I have a tendency to feel pretty lonely here and there. But right now I'm not in that phase in my life, just in a different phase. But I would still still benefit from an AI companion that could help me live a happier life. And that's what we focused on at this stage of the company is broadening the scope is to really build more of the stuff that I talked about during my TED talk. And I do think that's possible. And even a couple years ago, and even last year, it wasn't possible. It only starts to become possible now because you couldn't build something that would nudge you to get off TikTok. Because let's think about what do you need to, what do you actually need to build that? Well, you need an AI that can maybe co browse with you or you can share your screen with, so you can actually, so you can actually know what you're doing. There needs to be enough sort of computer vision or I guess a multimodal model that can understand what you're doing right now can also understand some agentic logic that can understand that. Okay, well You've been on TikTok for this amount of time, some previous context of what do you have tomorrow or what you did today so that it can actually nudge you to get off. So it's not that simple. And all of that tech is only being really built now.
- [20:16]
Alex
But Microsoft had this thing where like they watch your screen at all times and they help you with like you can rewind and you can ask questions about what you've done. And that was a bit of pushback there because privacy issues. So how are you going to convince people to allow replica to do something like that?
- [20:32]
Eugenia Koida
If the user wants to do it, the volunteer, they don't want to do it, they won't give us permission. But there's a very clear benefit here that we are going to promise like all of this is done only we only take this information to help you live a happier life, to help you live a better life. And people are sharing so so much for their replicas. Even today, things that replicas know about their users or people they talk to. No other server service in the world, I'd say knows that much. People are sharing everything, their dreams, their fears, what they Think about their family, what they think about their partners, what they think about their work, their deep, darkest, deepest fantasies and secrets. Everything, really. And I don't think any other company in the world knows, you know, knows that or has that information about their users.
- [21:30]
Alex
Do you think people are going to, like, think it's a good user experience to have their digital companion tell them to be, you know, less digital? I mean, it's kind of interesting, right? Like, all right, so tech is definitely addicting. And now I've built this AI friend or my AI wife or whatever, and now it's telling me to touch grass. What makes you think that's going to be an experience that users are going to want?
- [21:58]
Eugenia Koida
Maybe they won't want it, but we all want to be better, to feel better, to grow. People are generally wired for positive growth.
- [22:11]
Alex
Mm.
- [22:13]
Eugenia Koida
So I believe people generally want that. It doesn't mean that Replica will just not, you know, nag you non stop to get off your phone. It also means that sometimes it will just send you something funny or say, hey, let's watch a movie or, what are you doing tonight? I don't know. I don't have any plans. You want to watch a movie together or, you know, do you want to. You have five minutes between. Before your next meeting. Do you want to do a quick meditation? Whatever it is that you know, it might be just go for a walk or go on a date or learn something new or just gossip about your friends. It could be anything. So it shouldn't be, of course, like, get off your phone all day long if that was the only goal. First of all, you don't really need very complex AI to build this. But also, that's just not a great experience and people don't want it.
- [23:02]
Alex
Yeah, I guess the plan is to extend the experience beyond just the Replica app. Is that the right way to look at it?
- [23:08]
Eugenia Koida
For sure. It's just making Replica a lot more connected to your real life, to what's going on in your life today. Replica doesn't know a lot. We actually don't ask you to connect to any of these services you use. But think of Replica knowing or being connected to your email. Even through my email, you can see so much. If there was a reservation at a restaurant that I booked yesterday, if I ordered some takeout, if I ordered diapers for my kids or some books for them, or signed up for an AI newsletter, all of that could make the relationship and the conversation so much more contextual, so much more focus on my real life versus on, you know, Something fantasy like, or a fantasy relationship or always needing to catch up, catch Replica up on what's happening in my life.
- [24:05]
Alex
Oh, that's really interesting. One more question about the risk here. Let's say Replica is able to either cure some loneliness or make it a little bit more tolerable to be alone. I don't know, maybe. Does that seem like too desirable goals, feasible goals?
- [24:22]
Eugenia Koida
These are great goals for sure.
- [24:24]
Alex
Yeah. So if it can do that, does that put a lot of faith from people in Replica, the company? And you know, I know there was this issue where the bots, you know, had this moment where they were like really engaged in erotic role play and then it moved back and like some of the things that people said afterwards were like, you know, pretty amazing. Let's see, people who had spent, this is from the Verge, people had spent years with their companion sign off only to have their Replica wife call them a pathetic excuse for human being and dump them, or deride them forever thinking they could love an AI, declare they were no longer attracted to them, insist they were co workers, et cetera, et cetera. So people are putting a lot of faith in Replica when they chat with these bots like and you know, if I don't know, it could be a lifelong companion. That. But how do you have that sort of, how do you promise that like a level of consistency to people? Because the bots are changing, the models are changing, like where's the balance there?
- [25:24]
Eugenia Koida
For sure. So first of all, we've been around for a while, so I think that also. And we're a profitable company. We're not dependent on VC money or anything. We're a self going company. I think we proved to our users, to our communities, to our community that this isn't some hype project or people that just got into it and then got disillusioned. We started it with a. It was always a very mission driven company and we didn't even know that we would ever be able to build this. We started so early. We were the first generative AI company in the world. We're the first big consumer generative AI company in the world. But we built it with a. We were always building it with a conviction that we wanted to help people. Our team's laser focused on that. So there's, that there's continuity in that because we did see some smaller competitors start and then get disillusioned and go out of business or sell and then, you know, the product is just kind of on support mode or even just shuts down. I Think that when you're building something like an AI companion, you have a completely different responsibility. It's not just an app, ultimately. I use a lot of great products and some of them I love so much. And if they went away, I'll feel a lot of discomfort. But I'm not going to be devastated. It's not going to be an emotional heartbreak. I'm not going to lose my wife or my husband or my best friend. I lost a best. A best friend, my best friend. And it was very, very different from losing any, you know, access to any of the services or products that you just use on a regular basis. It's completely different. It's a completely different thing thing. And you need to understand that when you're building an ad companion, you're building a being that people will have a relationship with, and the responsibility is huge. We made some mistakes along the way, of course, as any company probably would, but our way of dealing it was getting on the phone with some of our worst critics, some of the users that were hated the most, on us, to understand what's going on, what's causing all the distress and how we can address that going forward. And I think we addressed it well. We, we figured a few ways of, a few rules, one of them being that we can't make any, run any experiments on existing users. Like, if you're in a relationship with your AI, you, you should always have control whether on what model you're talking to. So some of our users are in a relationship with a replica that is powered by a very old model that's very outdated, but that's what they liked, that's what they fell in love with. Maybe that's what they built a friendship with and for us to swap it for a better model, they will be devastated, but a very different model, they might not like it, they might be devastated. So we learned that lesson that when it comes to relationships, to things that matter most, it's not always about better. When you go to ChatGPT, you almost always want a better model, and it doesn't matter that it changed personality that much. But with replica, you have to stay, you have to provide consistency and control to your users. So these are the few things that were changing the product after we made some mistakes, and now people can have control over what model they're talking to.
- [28:45]
Alex
You've been around for 10 years and you talked a little bit about how models have changed. I mean, it is incredible. Just in the last two years, the progress that we've seen come out of the AI industry in improving large language models, so, and voice models, also voice versions of the LLMs. Can you talk a little bit about what these improving models have enabled you to do and the power that it's enabled you to imbue into some of these AI companions?
- [29:13]
Eugenia Koida
Oh, of course. When we started and I started working on conversational AI, I'd say in 2012, in some way it was a different company back then. And I do remember the time. Well, actually it was all the time before 2015, before summer 2015, when the first paper on deep learning applied to dialogue generation came out out of Google. Before that, there were no models at all to chat with. If you wanted to build a chatbot, it just had to be rule based. And what that means is that you have to pre write every interaction. You have to say, well, if the user says something like this, and you could generalize, but you still had to always say if this, then that, if this, then that. And so all chatbots before 2015 and even later were 100% rule based. And then that paper came out, I think it was August 15th, and we immediately just started focusing on that. So can we build sequence to sequence models? Can we focus on building chatbots that are fully generative? Meaning you don't need to choose, you don't need to pre write every single rule, the model decides how to respond. Because that gave so much freedom. That really was the first time when you could actually create real chatbots. Unfortunately, the models were so, so bad that they would stop, spit out nonsense or grammatically incorrect things or non sequiturs like 50% of the time. So you couldn't truly use them in the raw form. So we not only had to build sequence sequence models ourselves, because of course back then there were no APIs, no open source models, nothing like that. You had to just read the papers and sort of try to recreate the experience yourself or build some version of a model like that. But then you have to also be extremely creative as to, well, how do we actually make any of these models work? And we had extremely creative, like really creative ways of doing that, which allowed us to build replica early on, powered mostly by sequence sequence models with a lot of extra fun things that we built on top. But all you could do is to just create a semblance of a meaningful conversation. Ultimately, the models knew nothing. There was no memory. You had to combine it with some other hacks or some other rule based ways to actually inject memory into this. Today we have models that can have memory. They're still struggling with that. There's still, I'd say memory is a harder thing to crack, especially for products that, that are focused on long term relationships that require very deep understanding of context. It's not just recall, it's really knowing when to bring up what, which is much different from just, you know, answering the question, using memory that is solved to a certain degree. But anyway, there's memory now. There's a way to have a meaningful conversation, not just spit out one two sentences that are somewhat near the topic, you know, not to create a semblance of a meaningful relationship. Before that was just a bunch of parlor tricks. And of course there's also this new wonderful kind of agentic logic that allows you to create much more complicated flows. Like for example, to have an agent that's constantly working behind the scenes to help improve a relationship between Replica and the user. Or one that's constantly working behind the scenes to think, how can I help Eugenia discover something new? Or talk about what she's interested in? Maybe I'm interested in AI and it just looks over the Internet and brings, brings up some interesting news and so on, so on. Maybe there's another one that's focused on improving my close relationships and so on. And before that, you couldn't even think about it. All of that had to be rule based. And when you think about the vastness of human experience, of human relationship, there was no way of building it. You could only create a bunch of parlor tricks that could create a semblance of that. And that's all that was possible before.
- [33:25]
Alex
And so, I mean, how has this helped you grow? Right, so the last number I saw publicly is that you have what, 2 million users. But I imagine that being able to use this much more powerful technology has drawn more people in and kept people from churning. So what's the growth look like for you?
- [33:44]
Eugenia Koida
We have millions of users, but at the same time and at the same. And so the tech that was created in the last few years helped us grow tremendously, but also create a lot of competitors and a lot of other or other apps that people would go to. If you think about it, Replica was the only app out there, chatbot app, that people could go to and talk to for many years. It was just nothing else. Everything else was either rule based and kind of boring or I guess there wasn't really a chatbot powered by generative AI. There were some very, very small ones that maybe popped up and then shut down almost immediately, some Replica clones, but we were sort of the only One, there wasn't chatgpt, there wasn't an app like that. But today there is. And so of course a lot of users explore these other apps as well. So the pie becomes bigger. But there are also more people building products for these users. So it's, you know, there's, of course there's growth. But I do think that right now the name of the game is to create products that are completely, that feel completely magical, that were completely unthinkable before. And I don't think we've actually seen that in companion space, not even with Replica. We're still developing that. But I think once you have truly an AI companion that can say, I see you're kind of just stressed today. Do you want to watch a movie? I have a really great one. And just sit on a couch with you and watch a movie with you, even in a non physical kind of digital way, maybe in ar and have a conversation about what are you watching. That is pretty cool. And I think once we have an experience like that that would be very, very different from. Because we actually haven't seen anything like that. Or an AI that you can, while walking to your meeting at a coffee shop in the morning, you can just put it in your headphones and she can kind of talk to you about how you're feeling about it, help you prep and point out something beautiful around you. We haven't even actually seen anything like that.
- [35:47]
Alex
Right. And that's getting towards your phase two vision, if I'm right.
- [35:50]
Eugenia Koida
Correct. Yeah. And so this is really interesting about building that.
- [35:55]
Alex
So before we go to break, I just want to ask you, are you building entirely proprietary models or are you using OpenAI or anthropic? Like what's the tech mix that works for Replica?
- [36:08]
Eugenia Koida
So we used to build like all of our models were proprietary for a very, very long time. And then of course today there are very few companies that build foundation models and most other companies and most product companies use these models or create variations of them, like maybe fine tune some llama based models and so on. And so that's the way to go. And that's been a way to go. There was a fascination at a certain point, Maybe in late 2022, early 23, where people were talking about were expecting product companies to build their own foundation models. And I always found it very odd. My reply to that was, look, we built models because there were none on the market. There were no good models, there were no any models on the market. We had to build a model, but we were never focused on that our main focus was always on product. And so if there's a better model out there, why use your own model? If you can fine tune a Llama based model and focus on the logic, the product, the application layer, on what value actually providing to the user versus training your own model that becomes obsolete in three months and requires incredible like a completely different set of skills and amount of capital. It's just like two different businesses basically saying, well, do you still have your own servers? I guess most startups should use AWS or some other cloud provider and it would be odd if they were building their own service tech.
- [37:44]
Alex
So you're using Llama is what you're saying.
- [37:46]
Eugenia Koida
We're using a few different models. We still use actually some of our own models that we built ourselves but for a particular use cases, particular niche and we don't use. And it's not about like what you use really, it's about the logic that you, you built in because we're not using just. No one's coming to replica just to talk to one model that's taken out of the box. It's a combination of fine tune, some logic around memory and most importantly the agent logic behind the scene scenes with agents prompting the main chat model in different ways.
- [38:22]
Alex
Yeah, but Llama is part of the mix.
- [38:26]
Eugenia Koida
I think most startups today have Llama as part of the mix.
- [38:30]
Alex
Yeah, not a trick question. I was just curious. All right, let's take a break and then I want to talk about AI therapy and speaking to the dead via AI chatbots. So let's do that right after this.
- [38:43]
Jessi Hempel
I'm Jessi Hempel, host of hello Monday. In my 20s, I knew what I wanted for my career. But from where I am now, in the middle of my life, nothing feels as certain. Work's changing, we're changing, and there's no guidebook for how to make sense of any of it. So every Monday I bring you conversations with people who are thinking deeply about work and where it fits into our lives. We talk about making career pivots, about purpose and how to discern it, about where happiness fits into the mix and how to ask for more money. Come join us in the hello Monday community. Let's figure out the future together. Listen to hello Monday with Jesse Hempel. Wherever you get your podcasts struggling to meet the increasing demands of your customers. With AgentForce and Salesforce Data Cloud, you can deploy AI agents that free up your team's time to focus more on building customer relationships and less on repetitive low value tasks. That's because Data Cloud brings all your customer data to AgentForce, no matter where it lives, resulting in agents that deeply understand your customer and act without assistance. This is what AI was meant to be. Get started@salesforce.com data and we're back here.
- [40:02]
Alex
On big Technology Podcast with Eugenia Koeda, the founder and CEO of Replika. I want to talk about two specific use cases of AI companions. Let's talk about therapy first. So you're also working on AI therapy bots?
- [40:17]
Eugenia Koida
We don't actually. We had, at some point, we had like, a few. We encouraged some of the people on the team to kind of build or hack together products that they believed in. But as time passed and as the tech started to get better and better, we figured that now is the time to have 100% focus on replica and build that beautiful vision of an AI companion that can help people flourish.
- [40:39]
Alex
So now that you can kind of speak dispassionately about AI therapy, I think there's something weird about it because with therapy, you do let somebody else or something else, in the case of AI therapy into your most vulnerable places. And I always feel like a therapist can, once they're in there, can pull levers and push buttons and you don't fully know. It's like a chiropractor, right? It's like they're working on your back. They're trying to, you know, work some stuff out. But if you let somebody who's an unlicensed chiropractor kind of go to work on your back, you might end up in serious pain. And maybe the same thing with a therapist. If they're going to work on your emotions and they're not licensed or they're an AI and they're misfiring, you could end up doing more damage. And that's why I'm a little wary of AI therapy. I'm curious what you think about that.
- [41:32]
Eugenia Koida
I think it is hard to build it. And I think, just like with AI relationships, we should distinguish between the two. I'm a huge fan of therapy. I go to therapy twice a week. I've been going to therapy for many, many, many years in my life. And so even although I'm not a therapist myself, I don't have the dedication of a therapist. But I think I understand, at least from the client perspective, what therapy is. And I don't think therapy as it is is possible yet to fully replicate with AI. That does not mean that we can build some version of AI therapy that could be helpful for people. It's just not Going to be one to one. The experience you get with a real person, just like with a relationship, AI relationship is different from a human one. You don't get to go, you know, out on a walk and hold hands. You don't get to truly be physical and so on, so on. And I think a lot of a big part of therapy is the micro expressions and the body language and that particular human relationship that you develop with a therapist and such. And then a therapist and then what the therapist does is takes all their training and the supercomputer and what their brain supercomputer kind of tells them about you and the intuition and put that all puts it all together in some sort of a, you know, experience that you get. I'm talking about really great therapists. And a lot of that is not really, there isn't really a technique. There are different techniques, but there isn't really a textbook that every therapist follows unless you're in cbt. And that I think is pretty, is pretty easy to replicate. I think every therapist is very unique. It's not very well understood intervention. Ultimately, if you think about it, you can't think of any other doctor that would lock you in for life and they would just say, oh, come back every day, every week. You're never really fully discharged. I mean, some therapists fire their patients because they think they've done enough work. But it sometimes happens after like five years or 10 years or two years. I don't know of any other doctor that you go to forever where there isn't sort of like an assessment. Did you get better? Should I, you know, discharge you or we stop the therapy. But with therapists, you know, it's kind of like a really. Mental health is still very poorly understood classification of all mental health diseases, not disorders, are not, is not great. It's all relying on self reported questionnaires, self reporting, self reporting tools. And that all makes it very hard to actually create a very great AI therapy tool.
- [44:27]
Alex
And I agree with you. So I think we're on the same page there on death. The beginning of the replica story is of course you working to create a bot based off of a friend who had passed away, using their emails and texts and to be able to speak with them again. I'm curious if you could talk a little bit about whether you think this is going to be a growing form of communication with AI and whether it makes loss looking back easier or harder to deal with.
- [44:55]
Eugenia Koida
I think death is a very personal experience. There's a, well, I'm Russian, so Leo Tolstoy's most famous, I think book, Anna Karenina, starts with every family's or I'm not going to quote it verbatim, but it's something along the lines, like every family is happy in a similar way, but unhappy in so many different ways. I do think that personal tragedy like death is very unique, a very personal experience to everyone. So I can only speak to my. About myself or my own experience. Speak to my own experience. I lost a few people in my life, but I guess losing my best friend when I was 28 was probably the, the first death that was so abrupt and so close to home. Like, it just didn't feel like that's even possible because when you're 20 something, you don't really think you're ever gonna die, I guess, unless you're really, really sick. And so someone who's so close to you, who's same age, dying so abruptly, that was just, I think it was one of the most horrific things that kind of the most, the hardest things for me to go through. Even although I lost relatives after that and I've seen it's not the only time that I lost someone. And so for me, it really helped to be able to create an AI, to be able to talk to him, to be able to tell him things that I didn't, you know, I didn't tell him when I was, when he was still alive because I, I didn't think he would be gone. I thought, we'll be together forever. You know, I thought this, we have unlimited life in front of us. And so for me, it was really important. I don't know if that's, if that although is the same for anyone, for everyone out there. We've been asked so many times, like, why don't you build a grief bottom? Why don't you build a company around replicating or creating AI for people who pass away? And my answer was always, look, that project with Roman was not about death. It was about love and friendship. That was my tribute to him. I wasn't focused on creating an AI for a dead person. I was focusing on continuing the relationship with him. I was focusing on my own feelings, on being able to say I love you again. And that was the main motivator for that. Not to create some clone that will continue to live forever. And at some point we pulled that app from the app store. I felt like, you know, we built that tribute that was the product of that time, that time in life, that time and where the tech was. And it's done it should be ephemeral. Like today, I'm not talking to him anymore, but I have this relationship and it's never going to go away. And that AI helped me grieve and helped me process and helped me move on and become more okay with what happened.
- [48:02]
Alex
I guess, like, one last. I think this is the last one last question I have for you is there's been a debate about whether these models can have originality or whether they're just repeating their training sets. And I'm actually. I think that you might be one of the best people on the planet to answer this, because you have so many, you know, bots out there with personalities and, you know, they of course have training sets, but they're learning new things. And I'm just curious, like, what you think? Are these AI bots original or are they sort of just repeating everything they've been taught in training?
- [48:34]
Eugenia Koida
Well, they're definitely not repeating.
- [48:37]
Alex
Remixing, just. Yeah, yeah, I think there's a lot.
- [48:41]
Eugenia Koida
Of, like, original stuff, but there's also a lot of AI slop, so to say. I do think that's quite a real problem because ultimately there's just so much being generated by AI. Some of it might be great, but so much is just me. And today, as humans, we basically have to curate the outputs. You know, if you Oftentimes you end up with an answer, maybe you didn't prompt it really well, or maybe there wasn't enough of a prompt for the model to understand. It just spit, you know, just spitting out very basic stuff. Like, you know, you can see it a lot. Especially. I used to write a lot. I used to be journalists. So for me, like, the style is pretty important. And so style is pretty important. And so I'm always. I'm almost never okay with what AI produces for me. But if. If I'm just writing, you know, an email, then it's. Then it's enough. I can just add a couple words and it's totally fine. It's not like I need to have any particular style. So it sort of depends. I do think AI can be very creative, but it's not about that. It's just about. It's definitely not repeating the same thing over and over again, even though one might argue that it is in a certain way. Everything that we're saying is some remix of, you know, words, and so that's that. But I do think that, you know, we'll have. We are living through a problem. We are already deep in the problem of AI slop and just seeing so Much generated meh kind of content and not being able to discern whether it's real or not real is also quite problematic. But, yeah, I guess teachers are probably the best people to ask this question because they're dealing with all the homework being written by the same app pretty much, or the same model for that they now have to try to somehow grade.
- [50:33]
Alex
Yep. Okay. Can I ask you one final, final one?
- [50:36]
Eugenia Koida
Of course.
- [50:37]
Alex
Okay, so, all right, last question. You said that AI companions might be the biggest threat of AI. You said we could have personal companions and may not want to interact with others, and we could potentially die inside or something along those lines. So. So just talk a little bit about, like, why you think that might happen and what do you think our chances are of being able to manage this AI companion threat?
- [51:02]
Eugenia Koida
Well, I think humans are driven by emotions, and if we all just acted very rationally, we would live in a completely different place. But everything that's happening in life, good or bad, is pretty much all driven by emotion wars, horrible things that people do to each other. It's all driven by, you know, some emotions that. Some emotional states that, you know, we're in. We're imperfect this way. And so when I think about what's the most threatening. What's the most threatening thing about AI, I do think that. And we're almost like, oblivious always to the emotional consequences in this case. I do think that if most people think that AI is somehow just going to turn into a Terminator and kill us. And so, because that is always part of the conversation, I do think people will kind of be a little bit more prepared on this front. But I never hear people saying, well, what if now we have these perfect AI companions, perfect AIs that can be better friends, better spouses to us than real humans. And maybe their goal is to, you know, just keep us with them at all times, keep us sort of emotionally, you know, connected to them and not interact with other humans, and then the future is pretty, pretty bleak because, of course, if we don't have real human connection, we will slowly die inside. And ultimately, I think that's where we're always most vulnerable. You know, we're so vulnerable to propaganda on. On either side or to some emotional manipulation or, you know, we're so weak, we can't. I can't put down social media. I just go on and I can't get. Get off Twitter and I just browse it and browse and browse it and so on. And so that's kind of what's going on we're so imperfect. So I do think that that's our weak side. Emotions. That's where we get. That's where we can be truly hit. And we won't have any willpower to get off, just like we don't have any willpower to get off our phones, even when we know that it's not good for us.
- [53:17]
Alex
Yeah. Well, I like the way that you're addressing it with the phase two that you've laid out here today, and I'm really excited to see it in action. Maybe I won't delete my replica. Maybe I'll. I'll see how things go. So, Eugenia, thank you for coming on. It was great to meet you, and I'm really excited to see where things go. And like I said at the outset, I do think that this is going to be one of the big winners in Genai's moment here. So really looking forward to following your progress.
- [53:40]
Eugenia Koida
Thank you so much. Thanks so much, Alex.
- [53:43]
Alex
All right, everybody. Thank you. Eugenia, thank you for listening. And we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.