Podcast Summary: "The FIRE Movement Is Dead! (What You Need to Know)"
BiggerPockets Money Podcast
Hosts: Mindy Jensen & Scott Trench
Episode Date: October 17, 2025
Episode Overview
In this episode, Mindy and Scott tackle the provocative question: Is the FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) movement dead? Pushing back against sensational headlines, the hosts explore the true origins, key evolutions, and future directions of FIRE. With a blend of humor, nuance, and personal experience, they explain how FIRE is anything but extinct—it's evolving to become more inclusive, flexible, and focused on happiness.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Origins of the FIRE Movement
- Early Foundations:
- The roots of FIRE can be traced to the 1990s, significantly influenced by the book Your Money or Your Life by Vicki Robin and Joe Dominguez, which questioned the necessity of working until traditional retirement age. (00:58)
- The Millionaire Next Door (1996) and the broader concept of living below your means also shaped the movement. (01:21)
- Development of Retirement Math:
- The Trinity Study and William Bengen’s work on safe withdrawal rates further laid the groundwork for viable early retirement strategies.
- “Bengen started it and the Trinity study confirmed it.” - Mindy (03:10)
- The Trinity Study and William Bengen’s work on safe withdrawal rates further laid the groundwork for viable early retirement strategies.
- Explosion in Popularity:
- Blogs like Mr. Money Mustache, Early Retirement Extreme, and Mad Fientist broadened the conversation, especially post-Great Recession.
- “By the time I discovered the FIRE movement in 2013, these original concepts had been refined and refined and refined.” - Scott (01:21)
- Blogs like Mr. Money Mustache, Early Retirement Extreme, and Mad Fientist broadened the conversation, especially post-Great Recession.
2. The Early FIRE Community & Philosophy
- Extreme Frugality:
- Early adopters prioritized minimalism, cutting expenses to the bone (e.g., living on $7,000 to $24,000 per year).
- “He was living on like seven or 10 thousand dollars a year. And that didn't resonate with a lot of people, but it did resonate with some.” - Mindy (04:09)
- Frugality was not just about deprivation but about buying the freedom to leave traditional employment early. (05:06)
- Early adopters prioritized minimalism, cutting expenses to the bone (e.g., living on $7,000 to $24,000 per year).
- Community Policing:
- The “early retirement police” would critique those earning any post-retirement income, sparking debates about what truly counts as “retired.” (06:37)
3. The Evolution of FIRE (Recent Changes & Trends) (08:45)
- Splintering & Personalization:
- Scott observes that a decade of bull markets and wage growth has resulted in many FIRE pursuers becoming much wealthier than anticipated—raising new questions about enjoying money versus relentless frugality. (09:07)
- “Do I need to rewire my brain a little bit to start spending money and enjoying life?” - Scott (09:07)
- Mindy notes a shift: it’s now less about “how fast can you get to FI?” and more about enjoying life along the way. (11:37)
- “There's a lot more people talking about, I wish I would have enjoyed my journey.” - Mindy (11:37)
- Scott observes that a decade of bull markets and wage growth has resulted in many FIRE pursuers becoming much wealthier than anticipated—raising new questions about enjoying money versus relentless frugality. (09:07)
- Rethinking "Retirement":
- Many still find meaning and even income after "retiring"—whether by choice (e.g., starting a blog, volunteering, or creative projects).
- “This has really never been the case... That's a misconception with the FIRE community.” - Scott (12:23)
- Alternative meanings for FIRE are suggested: “Recreational Employment” instead of “Retire Early.”
- Many still find meaning and even income after "retiring"—whether by choice (e.g., starting a blog, volunteering, or creative projects).
4. Shifts in Withdrawal Strategies & Portfolio Construction
- Moving Beyond the 4% Rule:
- Withdrawal rates are now hotly debated: some advocate for more conservative rates (3–3.5%), others (like Frank Vasquez) for as high as 5% with diversified portfolios. (15:28)
- “I'm not seeing a lot of people withdrawing at the 4% rate.” - Mindy (15:28)
- Many “retirees” are not actually drawing down principal but continue earning or underspending.
- “Almost everybody has some source of income or cash flow well in excess of their spending in their early retirement.” - Scott (18:35)
- Withdrawal rates are now hotly debated: some advocate for more conservative rates (3–3.5%), others (like Frank Vasquez) for as high as 5% with diversified portfolios. (15:28)
- Portfolio Sophistication:
- Listeners are becoming more sophisticated, researching portfolio theory, risk, and diversification rather than simply following Boglehead-style index investing. (16:45)
5. Explosion of Subtypes and Flexibility
- New Flavors of FIRE:
- There are now multiple “flavors” to suit different goals:
- Barista FI: Part-time work with partial financial independence.
- Coast FI: Save enough early so investments can grow unassisted to retirement, while living off current earned income.
- Lean FI, Chubby FI, Fat FI: Ranging from barebones to luxury-level financial independence. (23:15)
- Mindy: “Now it's not just one person's definition.” (25:11)
- There are now multiple “flavors” to suit different goals:
- Inclusivity:
- Less rigidity around extreme frugality or “one right way” to FIRE. More focus on optionality, personal values, and family balance.
6. Is the FIRE Movement Dead?
- Conclusion: It’s Evolving, Not Dying
- The hosts unequivocally reject the “FIRE is dead” narrative. Instead, they see a community that is adapting, growing, and improving its philosophy of wealth, happiness, and freedom.
- “You are out of your mind if you think that people are going to reject this concept of FIRE.” - Scott (27:59)
- “I think this is a great change. And because it's more inclusive now, I don't want to be frugal, so therefore I'm not even going to bother.” - Mindy (27:16)
- The hosts unequivocally reject the “FIRE is dead” narrative. Instead, they see a community that is adapting, growing, and improving its philosophy of wealth, happiness, and freedom.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- On Critiques of FIRE:
- “Headlines would have you believe, mostly from influencers who cherry pick anecdotal evidence or Reddit threads and have no actual hard data on it.” - Scott (00:05)
- On Evolving Wealth and Spending:
- “Hey, guess what? Spending low income, working very hard and creating a huge gap between what you spend and what you make and then investing the difference... create a lot of wealth.” - Scott (09:07)
- On Enjoying the Journey:
- “I got there in 10 years, but if I did it in 11, I would have had a lot more fun. Wow, great years. Or 10 sucky ones. I think I'd rather have the 11 great years.” - Mindy (11:37)
- On “Retirement” Myths:
- “People think that retirement means... I’m either not going to earn any money or I’m not going to do valuable work... This has really never been the case.” - Scott (12:23)
- On Subtypes of FIRE:
- “There's all these different ways that you can still be financially independent. You don't have to amass a giant amount. You can still have a small job. Barista Fi. You can embrace the extreme frugality of the beginning of the fire movement and go really, really lean...” - Mindy (23:15)
- On the Future:
- “I think that there will be several new... people will reinvent the term FIRE in exactly the same concept and call it something different. Gen Z will have to rename it something new and so will Gen A as they become adults and go in there.” - Scott (34:14)
Timestamps of Major Segments
- Origins of FIRE:
- 00:05 – 06:37
- The Early Community & Frugality:
- 04:09 – 06:37
- Evolution over the Last Decade:
- 08:45 – 15:24
- Withdrawals, Investment Strategies, and New Challenges:
- 15:28 – 19:45
- FIRE Subtypes and Flexibility:
- 23:15 – 26:54
- Is FIRE Dead? Debate and Final Take:
- 27:51 – 33:16
- What’s Next—a Look to the Future:
- 33:35 – 38:29
Closing Reflections
- Both hosts agree that “one-size-fits-all” FIRE is fading, replaced by a customizable movement more accessible to a wider range of people and life situations.
- They anticipate that the next evolution will involve a focus on happiness, flexibility, and balanced financial planning—regardless of market cycles or critics.
- The episode invites listeners to reflect on their own financial independence journey and share takes in the comments.
Final Thought:
FIRE isn’t dead—it’s growing stronger, smarter, and more inclusive. The movement now encompasses a greater diversity of financial goals and lifestyles, aiming for true independence, happiness, and choice.
He is Scott Trench. I am Mindy Jensen, saying: “Retire FIRE.” (39:02)
