Can Trump Push Jerome Powell Out of the Fed? w/WSJ's Nick Timiraos

Summary

BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast Summary

Episode: Can Trump Push Jerome Powell Out of the Fed? w/ WSJ's Nick Timiraos
Release Date: November 22, 2024
Host: Dave Meyer
Guest: Nick Timiraos, Wall Street Journal Fed Reporter

---

Introduction

In this episode of the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast, host Dave Meyer delves into the intricate relationship between former President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Joined by Nick Timiraos, a renowned reporter from the Wall Street Journal specializing in Federal Reserve affairs, Meyer explores the potential implications of Trump's influence on the Fed's independence and what it could mean for the real estate market and the broader economy.

---

Understanding the Federal Reserve's Role

Time Stamp: 00:00 - 01:00

Dave Meyer opens the discussion by highlighting the Federal Reserve's significant impact on the economy, especially the housing market. He emphasizes that while the Fed doesn't directly set mortgage rates, its policies influence borrowing costs, which are pivotal for real estate investors who typically operate with substantial borrowed capital.

Quote:

"The Federal Reserve has a huge impact on the economy and particularly on the housing market."
— Dave Meyer [00:00]

---

Recent Fed Actions and Economic Outlook

Time Stamp: 01:00 - 04:43

Nick Timiraos provides an update on the Fed's recent policy decisions, noting a total of 75 basis points rate cuts in the year, including a 25 basis point cut post-election. He discusses the bond market's unusual response, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising by approximately half a point, contrary to expectations.

Key Points:

• Rate Cuts: Fed has cut rates by 75 basis points this year, aiming to support economic growth.
• Bond Yields: The 10-year Treasury yield has risen, indicating investor confidence in avoiding a recession.
• Inflation Forecast: Powell remains optimistic that inflation will decline, attributing current price increases to past economic strength rather than new inflationary pressures.

Quotes:

"They don't see new sources of heat. If you think about a fire, they don't see the fire reheating sort of on its own here."
— Nick Timiraos [03:25]

"Inflation is looking maybe a little bit firmer than expected."
— Nick Timiraos [03:25]

---

Potential Political Interference with the Federal Reserve

Time Stamp: 05:36 - 22:05

The conversation shifts to the contentious topic of President Trump's potential attempts to influence or remove Jerome Powell from his position as Fed Chair. Timiraos outlines the historical context, noting that Trump initially appointed Powell in 2018 but grew dissatisfied with the Fed's rate policies. Despite Trump's previous frustrations, legal protections make it challenging to oust a Fed Chair without cause, as defined by malfeasance or incompetence.

Key Points:

• Legal Constraints: The Federal Reserve Act protects Fed Chairs from removal without just cause.
• Trump's Stance: While Trump has expressed dissatisfaction, he has publicly stated he won't push Powell out unless Powell fails to perform his duties.
• Senate's Role: Senate Republicans have traditionally supported Fed independence, acting as a buffer against executive overreach.
• Powell's Commitment: Powell has firmly stated his intention to serve out his four-year term, resisting any political pressure to resign.

Quotes:

"It's an unaccountable and very powerful institution."
— Nick Timiraos [15:15]

"Powell's responded to those questions exactly the same way that he did five years ago. He said... 'No.'"
— Nick Timiraos [20:52]

"If Powell were to resign at the president's asking, you'd establish a new norm that the Fed chair answers to the president."
— Nick Timiraos [31:14]

---

Fed Independence: Benefits and Criticisms

Time Stamp: 12:27 - 19:47

Timiraos elaborates on the concept of the Fed's independence, explaining its historical evolution as a safeguard against political manipulation that could destabilize the economy. He highlights the advantages, such as preventing short-term political gains from undermining long-term economic health, and the criticisms, including perceptions of the Fed as an unaccountable entity wielding significant power without direct democratic oversight.

Key Points:

• Operational Autonomy: The Fed manages interest rates to maintain price stability and maximize employment without direct government interference.
• Political Scapegoating: The Fed often becomes a target for political blame for unfavorable economic conditions.
• Transparency Efforts: Increased transparency through minutes and speeches aims to justify Fed decisions and maintain public trust.

Quotes:

"Why do you have this unaccountable and very powerful institution?"
— Nick Timiraos [15:15]

"The Fed does try, especially compared to 30 years ago... They actually are informed by what they think is the best thinking and analysis."
— Nick Timiraos [16:53]

---

Future Scenarios and Market Implications

Time Stamp: 22:05 - 34:36

The discussion turns to possible future scenarios regarding Trump's second term and its potential impact on the Fed. Timiraos outlines that the most likely outcome is Powell serving his full term until May 2026. However, if Trump remains dissatisfied, he might attempt to influence future Fed appointments as vacancies arise, though this is constrained by the existing legal framework and Senate approvals.

Key Points:

• Base Case Scenario: Powell serves out his term, maintaining Fed independence.
• Alternative Scenarios: Trump could attempt to appoint more aligned Fed governors as seats open, allowing for gradual shifts in Fed policy.
• Market Reactions: Any aggressive attempts to undermine Fed independence could lead to severe market instability and legal challenges.
• Economic Policies: Trump's policies, such as tariffs and tax cuts, present unpredictable variables that could complicate the Fed's monetary strategies.

Quotes:

"The market might react very badly... it's going to be a very newsworthy and eventful year for the Fed."
— Nick Timiraos [31:14]

"If Powell were to resign at the president's asking, you'd establish a new norm that the Fed chair answers to the president."
— Nick Timiraos [31:14]

"Modeling Trump's economic policies for the Fed is just going to be more challenging."
— Nick Timiraos [32:32]

---

Potential Alignment Between Trump and the Fed

Time Stamp: 32:18 - 34:36

In a nuanced turn, Timiraos considers the possibility that Trump's economic objectives might sometimes align with the Fed's policies, particularly regarding rate cuts aimed at stimulating growth. However, he emphasizes the complexities introduced by Trump's unpredictable policies, such as tariffs, which could create new inflationary pressures that the Fed would need to manage.

Key Points:

• Shared Goals: Both Trump and the Fed share interests in lowering interest rates to support economic growth.
• Policy Uncertainties: Trump's regulatory rollbacks and tariffs introduce variables that could either align with or contradict the Fed's strategies to control inflation.
• Inflation Dynamics: The Fed's challenge will be to differentiate between temporary price shocks versus sustained inflationary trends.

Quotes:

"It's just a little bit like shaking up a soda bottle and trying to predict how much is going to come out."
— Nick Timiraos [34:36]

---

Conclusion

Dave Meyer wraps up the episode by acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's future amidst the political landscape influenced by Trump's second term. He underscores the significance of monitoring these developments closely, as they hold substantial implications for the economy and the real estate market.

Final Thoughts:

• The Fed's autonomy remains a cornerstone of stable monetary policy, despite political pressures.
• Market participants and real estate investors should stay informed about potential shifts in Fed leadership and policy direction.
• The evolving political dynamics present both challenges and opportunities for economic forecasting and investment strategies.

Quote:

"It's going to be a very newsworthy and eventful year for the Fed."
— Nick Timiraos [34:36]

---

Key Takeaways

• The Federal Reserve's policies are crucial for economic stability and have a direct impact on the housing market.
• Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to maintain his position through his term, resisting political pressures from Trump.
• Legal protections and Senate support uphold Fed independence, mitigating the risk of executive overreach.
• Future scenarios depend on how much Trump can influence Fed appointments within the legal framework.
• Investors should remain vigilant about Fed policies and their potential shifts due to changing political landscapes.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• Dave Meyer [00:00]: "The Federal Reserve has a huge impact on the economy and particularly on the housing market."

• Nick Timiraos [03:25]: "They don't see new sources of heat. If you think about a fire, they don't see the fire reheating sort of on its own here."

• Nick Timiraos [15:15]: "Why do you have this unaccountable and very powerful institution?"

• Nick Timiraos [31:14]: "If Powell were to resign at the president's asking, you'd establish a new norm that the Fed chair answers to the president."

• Nick Timiraos [34:36]: "It's just a little bit like shaking up a soda bottle and trying to predict how much is going to come out."

---

This comprehensive summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights shared in the episode, providing a clear understanding for those who haven't listened to the podcast.

Transcript

[Dave Meyer]

The Federal Reserve has a huge impact on the economy and particularly on the housing market. But after the recent presidential election, people are wondering, what is the future of the Fed? Everyone, it's Dave. Welcome to the BiggerPockets podcast and today I am joined by Nick Timmeras, who is a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and one of the foremost Fed reporters in the entire country. And we actually this podcast to go on our sister podcast on the market. But this is such an important topic for real estate investors that I wanted to air it here on the BiggerPockets podcast as well. If you're not familiar, the Fed stands for the Federal Reserve. And although they don't directly set mortgage rates, they have a huge impact on the economy and particularly on real estate because they help set borrowing costs. And as you probably know, most people.

[Henry Washington]

Who operate in real estate investing borrow.

[Dave Meyer]

A lot of of money. So Fed decisions and policies have a huge impact for all of us. So I wanted to give everyone the opportunity to listen to what Nick has to say about the future of the Fed, because it's probably going to impact each and every one of us. Let's jump into my conversation with Nick. Nick, welcome back to the show. Thanks for joining us.

[Nick Timiraos]

Thanks for having me.

[Dave Meyer]

So you're here and I'm going to ask many questions about the future of the Fed, but maybe you can help bring us up to speed. We all know that there was a Fed meeting right after the presidential election that they cut the federal Funds rate by 25 basis points. But what else happened in the last meeting that I and our audience should know about?

[Nick Timiraos]

Well, I think the big question right now is, you know, is the economy going to avoid a recession? And if so, you know, the bond market certainly thinks so. And so you've seen yields rise. I mean, it's unusual, right? The Fed has cut now 75 basis points this year. And you've seen the 10 year treasury yield go up, I don't know, a half point, probably not what a lot of people expected. And so I think the big question now is, you know, what, what happens from here, both on the policy side, Donald Trump's policies are a little bit unclear exactly how far he's going to go on tariffs, tax cuts, spending cuts, regulatory rollback, what does that mean for growth? What does that mean for inflation? There's going to be a lot to digest.

[Dave Meyer]

Got it? Yeah. And just to make clear whatever what Nick's talking about here, we've seen that the Fed has cut, you know, first 50bas basis points, half a percentage point back in September. Then we had a quarter point cut here in November. But at the same time, mortgage rates have gone up for all of us in the housing market. And that's because Fed doesn't control mortgage rates. That is much more closely tied to the bond market. And when the bond market believes that there is less risk of a recession, bond yields usually go up and take mortgage rates up with them. Just a quick primer on why mortgage rates have gone up in the last couple of months. Now, Nick, obviously we're going to unpack some of the stuff that you talked about in terms of policy. But after every Fed meeting, there is a press conference that some of us pay a lot of attention to. Did Jerome Powell and his press conference give any indication for what the Fed might do in the coming months or should we be expecting more rate cuts?

[Nick Timiraos]

Yeah, I mean, the Fed has signaled they expect to keep cutting rates and so Powell repeated that view. I think in terms of the economic outlook, maybe the most interesting thing Powell said was around the forecast for inflation because inflation is looking maybe a little bit firmer than expected. And Powell said that they still expect inflation to come down because what they really see right now is that firmer prices are an echo of past strength in the economy. They don't see new sources of heat. If you think about a fire, they don't see the fire reheating sort of on its own here. They think these are catch up increases in prices. And what would be an example of that, you know, your car insurance premium has gone up because car prices went up a lot two and three years ago. It's not that there's something new that's running through the economy. These are sort of the echoes of earlier price increases. And so if that's your story on inflation, then that suggests less concern that you'd have to do something different from interest rates from what you were expecting. The Fed had said they were going to cut interest rates. You still think inflation is coming down, then you're not going to react maybe quite so much to these a little bit stiffer than expected inflation readings.

[Dave Meyer]

Okay. So it's still, you know, we still have to see what happens. I think there's one more meeting this year in December, so we'll see what happens there. But it seems like the general consensus is still that the Fed intends to cut rates and get to a lower federal funds rate in the next couple of years. We just don't know exactly when and how rapidly those rates might come. At least that's, that's the last thing that we've heard so far. Now, of course, we all like, you know, sort of speculating and want to know what's going to go on with the Fed because it does have big implications for the economy and for the housing market. But there's sort of this other storyline that's been going on since the presidential election. And you actually, Nick wrote about this in the Wall Street Journal, sort of about the future of the Federal Reserve and whether or not Jerome Powell might be staying in his position. So can you just give us a primer on that situation?

[Nick Timiraos]

Yeah. You know, Powell was made Fed chair initially by Donald Trump in 2018. Of course, Trump soured fairly quickly on his selection because the Fed was slowly raising interest rates at that time. And Trump didn't think that, you know, inflation was a problem that needed to have kind of preemptively higher interest rates. The Fed stopped raising interest rates and actually cut a little bit in 2019 because of some concerns that global growth was slowing. Inflation was not picking up. And so, you know, there had been questions over whether Trump could fire the Fed chair. He had sort of vented to his advisors in 2018 and 19. I don't like this Powell guy. I'm stuck with him. You know, can I get rid of him? And they told him no. They said there's a four year term for the Fed chair. He also has a 14 year term as a governor. The Federal Reserve act, which created the Fed, says that you can only replace a governor, a Fed governor, for cause. And that's been interpreted by a court to mean malfeasance, impropriety, you know, incompetence, not just, I don't like what the guy's doing with interest rates. Okay, so Donald Trump loses in 2020. Biden comes in. Biden reappoints Powell in 2022. And the concern that the Fed chair would be fired is sort of over until Donald Trump comes back and people begin to ask him, well, what are you going to do with the Fed? Would you try to replace Powell? Now, what Trump has said this year is, no, I wouldn't try to replace him as long as he's doing the right thing. Which is sort of an interesting condition to. It's not an unconditional pledge. It's, well, the current situation, things seem fine. I will point out Trump has been very clear that he regards infl is a serious problem. He called it a country buster, that you have to fix inflation. But at the same time, Donald Trump has always preferred low interest rates. So a number of people have been asking, well, would Trump decide to try to push Powell out again if he thought maybe the Fed wasn't cutting interest rates fast enough or if he just wanted to have his own person in there? And there are some people in the president's orbit, you know, allies of the president who have been saying, no, we really think you could get this guy out if you wanted to. There are other people around the president who think that's a horrible idea, or I should say the president elect who think this is a horrible idea. You don't want to do this. You don't want to mess with the Fed right now. Especially when bond markets are kind of looking ahead and saying, wow, deficits are a lot higher than they were four years ago. Inflation has been a problem. So you start to interfere with independent monetary policy and you might not like what the bond market does.

[Dave Meyer]

All right, time for a short break, but we'll be back with Nick Timorous on Fed independence and how the Trump Powell relationship might look right after this.

[Henry Washington]

Black Friday is coming, which means people lining up outside of glass doors waiting to burst in and get their hands on some great deals. But there are some doors you don't want anyone smashing through and snatching stuff, and those are the doors to your home. You need the best home security system available. That's why I'm personally recommending Simplisafe. It's the system I use to keep my home and family safe. Their active guard outdoor protection changes the game by preventing crime before it even happens. If someone's lurking around, Simplisafe's agents see them in real time and can even talk to them, set off your spotlights and call the police before they've had a chance to break in. Plus, there are no long term contracts, no cancellation fees, and it's around a dollar a day for all of this protection. And right now, Simplisafe is giving exclusive early access access to its Black Friday sale to our listeners this week only. You can take 60% off any system with a select professional monitoring plan. This is their best offer of the year. So don't [e-mail] pockets to claim your discount. Don't wait. This offer won't last long. Keep your home, your family and your peace of mind protected with Simplisafe. There's no safe like Simplisafe.

[Adriana Coogler]

Hey, Henry Washington here from the on the market pod. You ever get frustrated while hunting for off market properties? Well, you're not alone. Just ask Alex, a fellow real estate investor who was in the same boat, struggling to find those hidden gems. Then he discovered Deal Machine. Now Alex effortlessly locates off market gems, leveraging Deal Machine's free unlimited contact data powered by the robust databases used by 911 call centers. And it automates mail campaigns seamlessly. So you ready to revolutionize your real estate game? Like Alex, visit biggerpockets.com dealmachine Sign up for free and start transforming your property hunting today did you know there's a.

[Henry Washington]

Way to invest passively in real estate and get monthly income without dealing with tenants, maintenance or property management? If you're an accredited or a high net worth investor, you can make cash flow without the headaches by investing in a private real estate fund, PPR Capital Management. Some of you might know PPR co founder Dave Van horn from the BiggerPockets forums, the podcast live events. He also literally wrote the book on real estate Note investing for BiggerPockets. But with over half a billion dollars in assets under management, PPR has provided investors with steady, truly passive income since 2007 and they've never missed a payment. So check them [e-mail] ppr today that's biggerpockets.com p want to invest in real estate but don't have the time or know the best local markets? Rent to Retirement has got you covered. Here's the deal. They've helped thousands of investors just like you find turnkey homes across the best US Markets. And best of all, they do all the heavy lifting for you. With over 255 star ratings on bigger pockets, Rent to Retirement experts help you build strategies to retire early through real estate. And right now, Rent to Retirement offers some amazing incentives on turnkey new construction properties. Just for example, you can get up to 30% off new build prices or you can get 0% down loan options or interest rates available as low as 3.99%. So don't miss out. These deals will not last. Text REI to 33777 or visit biggerpockets.com retirement to start investing in top cash flow markets today.

[Dave Meyer]

Hey everyone, welcome back to the show. I do want to ask some questions just about the legality of all this, but maybe we should just talk about independent monetary policy. You just stated that. And you know the Fed sort of operates in this, this gray area, right? You know the Fed governors and the chair are appointed by the president. They are not elected officials, but they sort of have had historically this space where they don't need government approval for their decisions, right? So when Jerome Powell and the rest of the Fed governors decide to change interest rates, the federal funds rate. They don't need approval for the President or from Congress, right?

[Nick Timiraos]

That's right. It's a very peculiar setup because normally, I mean, you wouldn't take a committee of tax experts and say, all right, you guys are in charge of tax policy, you go decide how much. I mean, those are very political decisions. So why is it that when we talk about independent monetary policy. Well, why, why do we have that? Well, first of all, what is independence? I mean, I think it's sometimes can get over torqued to mean that nobody can ever second guess the Fed. What it really means is they have some degree of operational autonomy. Congress and the executive branch set up the Fed and over time decided the Fed should set interest rates with an eye towards keeping inflation low and stable. They call that price stability and then maximum employment or I would call that a solid, a good labor market outcome. You want to balance those two goals and sometimes they're in conflict. But we're going to let the Fed figure out how to do that with really one instrument, which is interest rates. So they have the autonomy to do that. And why do they have that? Well, a couple reasons. One is that we've found through history that when you let political factors dictate what should happen with interest rates, I mean, you're always, politicians always want to win the next election, so you'll always sort of accept some stimulus today and if it overheats the economy, that is, if you have a little bit more inflation, well that's okay because we'll take that risk. And you want to have an independent central bank to come in and say, actually no, we need to make sure that inflation doesn't get out of control. That's what happened in the 1970s. And so after that, central banks around the world sort of fought for more autonomy or independence and governments gave it to them because it seemed like a worthwhile trade off. The other reason I think we have this arrangement where central banks enjoy more independence is, you know, frankly, Congress doesn't want to make these decisions to raise interest rates. They're unpopular, they're difficult decisions. And so they're able to blame the Fed. They're able to say, well, I'm not the one that made your mortgage rate or your auto loan rate go up. You know, the Fed did this. And so you can sort of blame the Fed. They become a convenient scapegoat for political purposes. So, you know, it's not written in stone anywhere that the Fed should be independent. It's sort of a norm that has developed over decades, really with some trial and error. And so that's why we have the system and arrangement that we have.

[Dave Meyer]

Well, that's a great explanation. Thank you, Nick. And it makes clear some of the arguments for Fed independence, like you said, it's a convenient political scapegoat is one reason, and it might help mitigate political short term thinking by either party. But what are some of the criticisms of Fed independence?

[Nick Timiraos]

Well, I think the criticism of it is why do you have this, you know, unaccountable and very powerful institution? And I mean, this is how I believe Trump thinks about it, is he owns it. If the economy is doing well or if it's not, you know, people are going to hold him accountable. So why shouldn't he have more say over what this very important interest rate setting body is doing with policy? You know, his advisors said to me when he was president, he doesn't really understand this fetish around Fed independence. He thinks that if the Fed's doing the wrong thing, he should be allowed to say it. For 30 years before Trump was president, there had been this soft norm, really begun by Bill Clinton and then continued by George W. Bush and Barack Obama, that the president wasn't going to opine on monetary policy. And the reason Clinton did this, he had an economic adviser who later became treasury secretary, Bob Rubin. Bob Rubin had been at the top of Goldman Sachs, and he had seen how George H.W. bush in 1991 and 1992 was in a fight with the Fed. He was arguing that the Fed should cut interest rates more, and the Fed didn't always go along. And so Rubin saw this and he said, well, this exposed how weak actually Bush was. You create concerns in the market that the Fed's not going to be as focused on inflation that can send interest rates up. You also fight with the Fed and you lose. It shows that you're weak. So he went and said, the White House is not going to talk about monetary policy. Now, Donald Trump, you know, decided he should be allowed to have his say because he thought, well, if these guys are royally screwing it up, somebody needs to stop them. One final point on this is, you know, the Fed does try, especially compared to 30 years ago. You know, part of defending their independence is being more transparent about what they're doing and why. And so that's why you see all of the speeches and, you know, they release the minutes, they release the transcripts, verbatim transcripts of their meetings, albeit with a Five year lag. But they're trying to show people that, you know, this isn't some political operation that they're running. They actually are informed by what they think is the best thinking and analysis, and they try to justify their decisions. And so that's sort of a way to guard against the risk that, well, this is just an unaccountable fourth branch of government and we should wipe this away.

[Dave Meyer]

Nick, you've told us a bit about how President elect Trump thinks about Fed independence, but what do other politicians think about this? How is Fed independence generally seen in Washington?

[Nick Timiraos]

Well, you know, up until recently, at least, Senate Republicans, when I would talk to members of the Senate Banking Committee, which is the committee that has jurisdiction over the Fed, they were quite supportive of Fed independence, and they were certainly supportive of it. The last time Donald Trump was president, once he realized he didn't like what he was getting from the Fed, he began to suggest nominees who he thought would be more loyal to him. And some of these nominees were seen as not terribly qualified by Senate Republicans, and they resisted. I think the big question going forward is, are things different now? Trump seemingly has a broader political mandate than he did eight years ago when he was elected. So do Senate Republicans push back on this more, or do they say if Trump wants his way with the Fed, he's the president, he's entitled to it. But generally, the Senate has been sort of a bulwark to support this idea of having a more independent monetary policy.

[Dave Meyer]

And does that go for the business community as well?

[Nick Timiraos]

I think so. I mean, I think, you know, we haven't really run the experiment here of what would happen if you had a Fed that maybe was seen as more responsive to political factors. You know, I should note some people think the Fed is very political and that they take politics into account in everything they do. If you talk to people who are former Fed officials, they completely, you know, reject that idea. But, you know, these are difficult economic judgments you're making. Will tax rates boost growth without inflation? Will deficit spending boost growth without inflation? If not, do you have to raise interest rates? You know, you can't kind of divorce those from whatever you think about what taxes or spending due to the economy. So there's, there's always going to be some room for interpretation.

[Dave Meyer]

Let's get back to where we are today. Obviously, Trump was elected just a couple of weeks ago, and there has been more speculation recently about whether Trump will try to fire Powell right away or he'll ask him to step down. But from what I've Seen, Trump actually hasn't suggested that he's going to fire Powell or ask him to step down. Is that right, Nick?

[Nick Timiraos]

That's right.

[Dave Meyer]

Okay, so is the new renewed speculation basically just based on things that happened back in 2018?

[Nick Timiraos]

I think it's a part of that. And it's also the fact that, you know, you've had some advisors around Trump arguing for a more muscular executive branch. You know, I think the reason you're seeing the questions now after Donald Trump's reelection is people want to know where are the guardrails going to be in a second term? And so they're asking these questions, you know, Donald Trump, would you try to replace Powell? He has not said that he would. And people are going to ask the Fed Chair the same thing.

[Dave Meyer]

And how has Powell responded to those questions?

[Nick Timiraos]

Powell's responded to those questions exactly the same way that he did five years ago. He said five years ago that he has a four year term as chair and he intends to serve it. And he was, you know, extremely direct at the press conference in early November when he was asked, do you think the President has the authority to replace you? It was a one word answer. No.

[Dave Meyer]

We actually pulled the audio of that interaction. Here's the clip. Some of the President Elect's advisors have suggested that you should resign. If he asked you to leave, would you go? No. Can you follow up on, do you think that legally you're not required to leave? No. Do you believe the President has the power to fire or demote you? And has the Fed determined the legality of a president demoting at will any of the other governors with leadership positions not permitted under the law. Not what? Not permitted under the law. All right, super interesting. Thank you, Nick. So it seems like Powell is pretty dug in on serving out the rest of his term. So how, how might this play out? Nick, I won't ask you to predict the future, but what are some of the possible scenarios from here?

[Nick Timiraos]

Well, I think the main scenario is that Powell just serves out his term. It ends in May of 2026. And so, you know, that's 17 months of the next four years of Trump. I think that is the base case scenario. Could Trump change his mind and decide to do something? Of course. So what would happen in that scenario? I mean, if you want to go into that kind of hypothetical rabbit hole. Well, one scenario that Trump's advisors floated last time was, okay, the law says you can't fire him as chair. And, you know, his advisors told him last time, you can't do this. And, you know, I reported recently that in 2018 and 19, when this did become an issue, Powell told Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, I will fight this. You need to know that I will fight this if people want to make an issue of this. And of course, Trump didn't fight it. Right. He later tells Powell in a phone call, he described this phone call to some other people. He said that he had told Powell, I guess I'm stuck with you. And so even though Trump talked a lot about potentially replacing Powell, he never did it. And it's possible he never did it because he knew that there would be a legal fight, that it would be very disturbing of markets potentially. And so his advisors had come up with this idea, well, you can't fire him, but maybe you could demote him as the chair. Why would you do that? Well, the law that creates the chairs for your term is silent on the four cause removal protection that the governors have. So there are some people who said, well, maybe you could just demote him and then could you elevate somebody else into the chair? Seems like a lot of effort to do that for just, again, you know, a 16 or 17 month term that Powell has left. And then if you look at different court rulings and opinions from Supreme Court justices, a number of them have sort of said they see the Fed as different, that monetary policy, the history of the Fed and the predecessor institution, the Second bank of the US Create some reason to think that maybe the Supreme Court would rule in favor of the Fed or Powell on this. But I will stipulate, you know, we're talking about sort of extreme tail risk hypotheticals here.

[Dave Meyer]

Yeah. So it sounds like the most likely scenario is that Trump and Powell find a way to work together for the 15 or 16 months, as you said, of Trump's second term. And then Trump would correct me if I'm wrong, then he could name his new chairperson. But does that chairperson have to come from the existing Fed governors or would he be able to appoint someone completely new?

[Nick Timiraos]

He'll be able to appoint someone completely new because the way the Fed governor seats work is one of them turns over every two years. So in January 2026, one of the current Fed governors, her term will expire. Adriana Coogler's term will expire. And so on February 1, 2026, Trump will be able to put somebody new into that job. And that's about four and a half months before Powell's term as chair is up. So presumably whoever gets that seat could become the chair four months later. And if anybody else on the Fed board retires early, maybe they take a Fed governor, Mickey Bowman, and make her the head of a bank regulatory agency. That would give you another vacancy to fill on the board. So people don't normally serve their entire terms. If people step down early, then that gives you other vacancies on the board. But this is a difference from eight years ago. In Trump's first term when he took office, there were a lot of vacancies on the board. He had an opportunity early to remake the Fed. He had up to five vacancies in his first 13 months. And this time, if everybody stays and nobody leaves early, he'll only have one vacancy in his first two years.

[Dave Meyer]

All right, time for one final break. But stick with us. More on the future of the Fed and how different scenarios might affect the market on the other side.

[Adriana Coogler]

Hey, Henry Washington here from the on the Market pod. Ever feel stuck while searching for off market deals? Well, let me introduce you to Sarah, a savvy real estate investor who turned her fortunes around with Deal Machine. Sarah now taps into free unlimited contact data powered by the same databases used by 90% of US caller ID systems. She easily sends automated mail campaigns. And thanks to Deal Machine's new private investigator tool, Sarah can even track down those elusive corporate leads. This powerhouse combo keeps her steps ahead of the market. Want to invest like Sarah? Head to biggerpockets.com dealmachine and sign up for free. Start turning hidden opportunities into your investment success with just a few clicks.

[Henry Washington]

Are you looking for a way to earn monthly passive income without the hassle of property management? If you're an accredited or high net worth investor, here's your answer. PPR Capital Management. Now you might know PPR's co founder Dave Van Horn for Biggerpockets. He actually wrote the book on real estate note investing for Biggerpockets. But what you might not know is that Dave and his team at PPR Capital Management have a wealth of experience in both the mortgage and commercial real estate industries and they strategically invest in mortgage notes and commercial property across the country. With over half a billion dollars in assets under management, PPR has delivered steady passive monthly income to investors since 2007 without ever missing a payment. Check them [e-mail] PPR that's biggerpockets.com PPR.

[Dave Meyer]

Do you want to invest in cash.

[Henry Washington]

Flowing rentals but don't have the time to manage the properties? Is your local market too competitive or expensive to invest in? Rent to retirement offers new construction turnkey investment properties that you can buy with as little as 5% down and rates as low as 3.99%. Their team handles everything from financing, management, insurance and more, so you can live where you want and invest in the markets that offer the best returns. Rent to Retirement has the best reputation in the industry, with more five star reviews than any other company on the BiggerPockets website. To learn more, visit biggerpockets.com retirement or just text REI233 777 to start investing in the best markets today. This show is sponsored by Airbnb. If you want to earn some extra money, there are things you can do that aren't particularly easy. You could donate plasma, you could search for coins on the beach, or you could bust out a breakdance routine on the subway. I've done it. It's super embarrassing, but here's an easy way to make some extra cash. You already have an Airbnb. That's right. If you've got a home or some unused space, you have an Airbnb. So Airbnb it. You can be thinking hosting sounds a bit overwhelming, but now it's easier than ever because a co host can do the hosting for you. With the co host network, you can hire a quality local co host to take care of your home and guests so you can lay back on your vacation or breathe easy on your business trip. Because your co host can take care of everything from creating the listing they manage, the reservations message guests offer on site support. They can even help design and style your home so you'll be earning extra money and someone else will be handling all of it for you. So Airbnb it. Your home might be worth more than you think. Find out how [e-mail] host that's airbnb.com host trying to run your business all by yourself? It's too hard to hire. I don't have time, you say. But what if I told you all that you need is Indeed. Indeed is your matching and hiring platform with over 350 million global monthly visitors, according to Indeed Data, and a matching engine that helps you find quality candidates fast. So ditch the busywork. Use Indeed for scheduling or screening messaging so you can connect with candidates faster. And Indeed doesn't just help you hire faster. 93% of employers agree Indeed delivers the highest quality matches compared to other job sites, according to a recent Indeed survey, leveraging over 140 million qualifications and preferences every day. Indeed's matching engine is constantly learning from your preferences, so the more you use Indeed, the Better it actually gets. Join more than 3.5 million businesses worldwide that use Indeed to hire great talent fast. And listeners of the show are going to get a great deal a $75 sponsored job credit. To get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com biggerpockets all you got to do is go to indeed.com biggerpockets right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Indeed.com biggerpockets need to hire you need Indeed.

[Dave Meyer]

Welcome back, investors. Let's jump back in. Okay, so of course no one knows what's going to happen, but it sounds like the most probable scenario again is that Trump and Powell choose to work together for the first 12, 16 months. And if at that point Trump is unhappy with the direction of the Fed, he'll have the option to name a new Fed governor who could then be appointed by Trump to be the chairperson of the Fed. And assumably that person would have monetary policy inclinations that are more aligned with President Elect Trump's. And so sounds like, Nick, you believe that's more likely because rather than sort of go through this potential legal battle, that Trump will have a chance to name a new Fed chairman in any way within the first two years of his second term.

[Nick Timiraos]

Yeah, that's right. You know, you'd go through potentially legal battle. The market might react very badly. I mean, economists I talked to think this, you know, before a court would even pick it up, the market would react in such a way that everybody would reconsider whether you really wanted to go kind of the nuclear option here to the courts. You know, it would probably be harmful for everybody involved. It'd be a lose, lose for the Fed even if you won this decision. I mean, I think people have said to me, well, why is Powell, why would Powell be so committed to this? Is it personal ambition? And the answer is no. This is about defending a principle of central bank independence. If Powell were to resign at the president's asking, you'd establish a new norm that the Fed chair answers to the president. And if the president doesn't like the monetary policy he's getting, then you just replace the Fed chair. That would be a completely different turn from the central bank that we've had for the last 50 or 60 years.

[Dave Meyer]

Nick, do you think it's possible that Trump and Powell are actually more aligned than people think they are? Because we've just talked about that the Fed intends to keep cutting rates. Trump has said that he'd like lower rates. So is it possible that they are actually trying to do the same thing.

[Nick Timiraos]

It is possible. I mean, the Fed's goal is to have the soft landing, right, to have inflation come down without a downturn. It's what we've seen signs of happening this year. I think the challenge here is that Trump's policies, it's very hard to know how to model them. There's a couple examples, regulatory rollback, you could see that as something that might help with, with inflation because you're increasing competition, you're making it possible for the productive capacity of the economy to produce more goods and services. So that could be disinflationary tax cuts. How much growth do they create? Are you increasing deficits? And are you going to have to, you know, compensate investors more to buy a Treasury security, to buy a Treasury bond that could cut in different ways? Tariffs, I think, are a wild card. There's an argument that, you know, even if tariffs increase prices, they only send up the price once. Inflation isn't a one time increase in the price level, it's a year after year increase. So the question right now is with the Fed, how would they react to a one time increase in a tariff? Would you allow prices to go up once and then say we're not going to try to offset that with tighter monetary policy? Because that could create a slowdown that you don't think is necessary if you don't think inflation is going to be a problem. Or there's a world in which officials conclude we just went through these inflationary shocks. Now consumers have become accustomed to inflation, unions are bargaining for higher wages when prices go up. That's maybe a different inflationary environment we could be in where the Fed decides that they have to raise rates if tariffs go up. That would be something that I would think the Trump administration would be quite frustrated about. So it's just, it's a little bit like shaking up a soda bottle and trying to predict how much is going to come out when you open the lid, how quickly you open the lid. There are different forces and I think modeling Trump's economic policies for the Fed is just going to be more challenging.

[Dave Meyer]

Well, thank you so much, Nick. Although we don't know exactly what's going to happen, one thing has been made clear is that it's going to be a very newsworthy and eventful year for the Fed. And we'll be certain to keep our audience here posted about any news that impacts the economy and the housing market. Nick, thanks so much for joining us today.

[Nick Timiraos]

Thanks for having me.

[Dave Meyer]

Thank you.

[Henry Washington]

All for listening to the Bigger Pockets Real Estate Podcast. Make sure you get all our new episodes by subscribing on YouTube, Apple, Spotify or any other podcast platform. Our new episodes come out Monday, Wednesday and Friday. I'm the host and executive producer of the show, Dave Meyer. The show is produced by Ian Kay, copywriting is by Calico, content and editing is by Exodus Media. If you'd like to learn more about real estate investing or to sign up for our free newsletter, please visit ww biggerpockets.com the content of this podcast is for informational purposes only. All host and participant opinions are their own. Investment in any asset, real estate included, involves risk, so use your best judgment and consult with qualified advisors before investing. You should only risk capital you can afford to lose and remember past performance is not indicative of future results. BiggerPockets LLC disclaims all liability for direct, indirect, consequential or other damages arising from a reliance on information presented in this podcast.