Summary of "Another Brawl Between New York and the Trump Administration"

Podcast Title: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Host: Bill O'Reilly
Episode: Another Brawl Between New York and the Trump Administration
Release Date: March 20, 2025

Introduction

In this episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O'Reilly delves into the escalating conflict between New York City and the Trump administration. The discussion centers around the New York City Transit Authority (MTA), rising crime rates in the subways, and the political ramifications of these issues on both local and federal levels.

Crime in New York City Subways

Rising Assaults and Lack of Transparency

At [00:33], an unknown political commentator addresses the ongoing tensions between New York City and the Trump administration, focusing on the MTA's reluctance to disclose crime statistics. The commentator highlights that the MTA receives $14 billion from the federal government, which is now at risk due to the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request for detailed crime data.

"The MTA doesn't want to give these stats out because it's violent down there in the subway. And the stats about assaults are harrowing. 56% higher now than they were in 2019. 56% felony assaults." ([02:10])

The commentator explains that assaults in the subway system have surged by 56% since 2019, with many incidents involving roving gangs and individuals struggling with mental health issues. These individuals often lack stable housing, forcing them to live on trains, and their interactions frequently escalate into physical violence.

Impact on Federal Funding

DOJ's Stance and Potential Funding Hold-Up

The commentator emphasizes the DOJ's authority to protect citizens and their obligation to oversee areas with uncontrolled crime. If cities like San Francisco, Chicago, and New York City fail to manage their crime rates, the federal government may withhold necessary funds until improvements are made.

"The federal government has a right to protect all citizens. Not only a right, but an obligation. And if the Justice Department said, look, we have an out of control situation in San Francisco, in Chicago, in New York City and all three of those places, you do, then they're not going to get federal dollars until they clean it up." ([03:20])

This stance puts immense pressure on New York City's administration to address the crime issue promptly to avoid losing substantial federal funding, which is crucial for the city's operations and infrastructure.

Comparison with Suburban Areas

Nassau County vs. New York City

Contrasting with the situation in New York City, the commentator discusses the relative safety of neighboring Nassau County. The stricter law enforcement and harsher penalties in Nassau deter drug dealers and reduce street crime significantly.

"We don't have a Nassau county street crime like they have in New York City. So I can walk around almost every town here and I have to worry about somebody coming up and punching me in the face." ([04:15])

This comparison underscores the effectiveness of stringent law enforcement policies in maintaining public safety and preventing the proliferation of gangs and drug-related crimes.

Political Implications

Mayor Adams, Governor Hochul, and the Mayoral Race

The rising crime rates and the potential withholding of federal funds pose significant challenges for New York City's leadership. The commentator predicts that Mayor Adams will face political setbacks due to the inability to control subway crime.

"This is why Adams is going to lose. I don't believe Cuomo can really. He'll say he can, but, you know, he's responsible for the no bail debacle." ([04:50])

Additionally, the potential division within the Democratic Party could pave the way for alternative candidates like Curtis Lewa or Sliwa to gain traction, especially if the incumbent leadership fails to address the core issues effectively.

"Cuomo will beat Adams in the primary. On the other side, Curtis Lewa, who is the toughest of the candidates against crime. He if the Democrats can divide, has a chance, can win the mayoralty." ([05:10])

The commentator also touches upon the broader implications of progressive policies and their impact on law enforcement and public safety, suggesting that leniency towards low-level crimes has exacerbated the situation.

Conclusion

The episode underscores a critical struggle between New York City and the federal government, primarily driven by alarming increases in subway-related crimes and the MTA's resistance to share pertinent data. The potential withholding of federal funds serves as both a pressure mechanism and a possible catalyst for political upheaval within the city's leadership. As the situation unfolds, the effectiveness of New York City's response will significantly influence its political landscape and public safety outcomes.

Notable Quotes:

• "56% higher now than they were in 2019. 56% felony assaults." — Unknown Political Commentator ([02:10])

• "The federal government has a right to protect all citizens. Not only a right, but an obligation." — Unknown Political Commentator ([03:20])

• "This is why Adams is going to lose. I don't believe Cuomo can really." — Unknown Political Commentator ([04:50])

• "Cuomo will beat Adams in the primary. On the other side, Curtis Lewa... has a chance, can win the mayoralty." — Unknown Political Commentator ([05:10])

This comprehensive analysis provides listeners and readers with a clear understanding of the multifaceted issues surrounding crime in New York City subways, the political fallout, and the broader implications for federal funding and local governance.