
BillOReilly.com Bonus
Loading summary
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra. See full terms@mintmobile.com Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.
Bill O'Reilly
Fascinating, fascinating woman. I think she went to Boston University, where I accrued a master's degree in broadcast journalism. She got a degree in. Let's see what she got a degree. And International Relations and economics. Wow. So she is a fellow terrier. At age 29, she became the youngest female congressperson in the history of the United States. She represents parts of the Bronx, Eastern Bronx, and then you go across the white stone at Throgs Neck Bridge into Queens, and she represents parts of Queens. A lot of her district is dire poor. Okay, so Ocasio Cortez goes to Congress. She's now 35 years old. She is a Bernie Sanders acolyte. Okay. She was an organizer for his presidential campaign in 16 and believes that Bernie believes. I don't know if she's as extreme as Bernie, but she's right there. Okay, so Bernie Sanders, the senator from Vermont, is a communist. He'll tell you he's a socialist, Democrat or whatever, but he's a communist. I've traced him. I know what he wants. I know what he believes. I don't know if Ocasio Cortez is at that level. A communist is someone who will seize private property in order to do what communists want to do, which is make everybody equal economically, which is impossible. You can't do it. It's never worked. It never will work because some people have more aptitude, some people are lazy. You just can't make everyone the same economically. And then the communist hierarchy in every single situation enriches itself. But they don't believe in private property. Bernie Sanders does not believe it, even though he has a nice big house on Lake Champlain and a nice situation in D.C. and his wife made a ton of money bankrupting a college in Southern Vermont. Look it up in theory. In government, Bernie wants to do a wealth tax that's a seizure of private property, and he's the biggest wealth tax Guy. Okay? Now, Ocasio Cortez is right there with him, and she's out on a tour with him, the Oligarchy tour, telling Americans, working people mostly, that the rich billionaires steal everything. And that's why you don't have as much as you want, which is a bunch of hooey. But you've heard it. You make your own decision on it. But why this woman is so fascinating is because she's getting some traction. She's very photogenic and she's articulate, and she's appeals to younger people. So it's a new study out from Yale University. 4,100 US registered voters, and it says if the Democratic presidential primary were held today, would you vote for. Okay. Kamala Harris, 28. Ocasio Cortez, 21. Buttigieg, 14, Newsom, 6. Now to get 21%. Where Harris gets 28, then the press. Okay, Ocasio Cortez on. She's coming up. Okay, let's listen to her two times. All right, and we'll analyze rule number one.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
If you're trying to call for the end of unrest, but you don't believe health care is a human right, if you're afraid to say Black Lives Matter, if you don't, if you're too scared to call out police brutality, then you aren't asking for an end of unrest. You are asking for injustice to continue and for your people to continue to endure the violence of poverty, the violence of a lack of housing access, the violence of police brutality and not say a damn thing. That's what you're asking for.
Bill O'Reilly
All right? Police brutality in this country is one of the lowest in the world. We all know that from the statistics. I love the. The violence of lack of housing access. That means you government should give you a house. That's what it means. You don't have a house. You like government give you one. And then, you know, if you are too scared to say black Lives Matter. I'm not. Black Lives Matter to me. But I'm not funding an organization that hates the cops, wants to decertify them, wants the criminals to run wild. And then we find out the organization Black Lives Matter uses millions of dollars in donation to buy expensive real estate for themselves. Okay, Alexandria, do we get that? Getting all that. And injustice. Environmental injustice. Endure the violence of poverty. The violence of poverty. See? So the government should know poverty. But you can't do that unless you take from everybody what they have, all the successful people, all the wealthy oligarchs. So it's sounding like, she's a communist to me. All right, Just a few days ago, she was in Bakersfield, California.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Go, Bakersfield. This is a matter of fact. Donald Trump is a criminal. He was found. He was found guilty of 34 felony counts of fraud, found liable for sexual abuse. And if he wants to find the rapists and criminals in this country, he should look into in the mirror.
Bill O'Reilly
No less defamatory. Trump could sue her, probably lose because of, you know, First Amendment. It's her opinion, that kind of thing. It's defamatory. And she should, at this point, have a little bit more than that, but she doesn't. All right, so when I hear someone younger, always, oh, how great Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is. I. If I get an opportunity, I said, what? Why do you think she's so great? What about her appeals to you? What's her strongest suit? Is silence. And then once in a while, well, she wants to get the billionaire or, you know, with never. A specific program. Never. Never. Well, she'd like to pass a law that says that never. It's all emotion, 100% emotion. But that's how you get elected. That's how Donald Trump got elected. The MAGA movement is all emotion. Okay, so Ocasio Cortez has a future. I don't know if she's going to run for senator in New York. That would be the launchpad. It's hard to go from a congressperson to president a few times, but not many. You got to be a governor or a senator. But in this populist age. I don't know what her springboard is here. Schumer is very unpopular in New York State. She might be able to beat him. Schumer might in New York State, if she runs against Schumer, that'll be a hell of a race. Okay. Now, a part of me admires the woman for getting out there and espousing whatever it is she is espousing. I like achievement. I like ambition. But the sane part of me says, dangerous. She doesn't know much. Imagine me interviewing Ocasio Cortez in a very calm setting, but no rhetoric. You'd have to answer the questions. And some of the questions be historical, and some of them would be contemporary, and some of them would be opinion, and some of them would be fact. And some of them. Can you imagine an interview? Do you think she'd do well there? No, it's not really fair. She's 35 years old. Okay. But if you want to be president, and the final thing is, if You're Putin and you're sitting there in Moscow figuring out how you can kill more people. You want her to be president of the United States. She's not going up against Putin or Xi. The Chinese. Chinese are going, oh, yeah, that's what we want. Because they know there's no way. Yeah. She would surround herself with advisor just like Biden because Biden couldn't function. How did that turn out? Okay, but she's there. The far left of the Democratic Party, they like her. Bernie is like 89, 95, 102, whatever. He's going nowhere. She's Bernie Sanders light, and she's not going away. I would like you to check out something. Do me a favor. That's favor we have on billorilly.com premium and concierge membership. If you are a fact finder, like facts and like hard data, not emotion, not ideology, because we don't do that. I wish you would consider premium or concierge membership. Get a free book, any book you want, which makes the membership fee, like, so low in this day and age. I mean, trying to keep cost effective. But more, more than anything, it's fun. You get the message boards, you're involved and you don't have to agree with me. I like people who don't agree with me. You're robust. Now, we have tons of concierge and premium members, but just check it out, see if you like it. All right. And thank you for your kind attention. We'll talk to you again soon.
Podcast: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Host: Bill O’Reilly
Release Date: April 23, 2025
Timestamp: [00:35]
Bill O’Reilly begins by providing an overview of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s background. He highlights her academic credentials and rapid ascent in politics:
Education and Early Achievements: O'Reilly notes, "At age 29, she became the youngest female congressperson in the history of the United States," representing parts of the Bronx and Queens. He underscores the economic struggles of her district, describing it as "dire poor."
Political Alignment: O’Reilly emphasizes AOC’s alignment with Bernie Sanders, referring to her as a "Bernie Sanders acolyte" and labeling Sanders as a "communist." He asserts, "Bernie Sanders does not believe [in] private property," critiquing his stance on wealth taxes and property seizure.
Timestamp: [00:35 – 04:19]
O’Reilly delves into AOC’s political ideology, drawing parallels between her and Bernie Sanders:
Economic Equality and Communism: "She is a communist to me," O’Reilly states, arguing that AOC’s policies aim to "make everybody equal economically," which he deems "impossible."
Wealth Redistribution: He criticizes proposals like the wealth tax, suggesting they amount to property seizure: "In government, Bernie wants to do a wealth tax that's a seizure of private property," and extends this criticism to Ocasio-Cortez.
Support for Wealth Tax and Property Rights: O’Reilly argues that Ocasio-Cortez’s stance on economic issues would require taking from the wealthy to support the poor, which he believes is unworkable: "Some people have more aptitude, some people are lazy. You just can't make everyone the same economically."
Timestamp: [04:19 – 06:13]
The podcast features excerpts from AOC’s statements, followed by O’Reilly’s rebuttals:
AOC’s Call for Justice:
AOC states:
“If you're trying to call for the end of unrest, but you don't believe health care is a human right... then you aren't asking for an end of unrest. You are asking for injustice to continue...” [04:19]
O'Reilly’s Response:
"Police brutality in this country is one of the lowest in the world," he counters, challenging AOC’s claims about systemic injustice. He misunderstands and misrepresents AOC's stance on Black Lives Matter, stating, “I'm not funding an organization that hates the cops...”
Timestamp: [06:13 – 06:44]
O’Reilly addresses AOC’s remarks regarding former President Donald Trump:
AOC’s Accusations:
AOC asserts:
“Donald Trump is a criminal. He was found guilty of 34 felony counts of fraud...” [06:13]
O’Reilly’s Counterargument:
He labels AOC's statements as "no less defamatory," suggesting that Trump could sue her: "It's her opinion, that kind of thing. It's defamatory."
Timestamp: [06:44 – End]
O’Reilly analyzes AOC’s growing influence and potential trajectory within the Democratic Party:
Rising Popularity: Citing a Yale University study, he notes AOC's significant support among younger voters: “AOC, 21%... she's coming up.”
Electoral Appeal: He attributes her success to her "photogenic and articulate" persona and her ability to engage younger demographics.
Potential Political Ambitions:
"I don’t know if she's going to run for senator in New York... She might be able to beat him [Schumer]," O’Reilly speculates, contemplating her possible challenge to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
Concerns About Competence:
O’Reilly expresses skepticism about AOC’s readiness for higher office: “Imagine me interviewing Ocasio Cortez in a very calm setting, but no rhetoric... No, it's not really fair.”
Global Implications: He warns against AOC’s potential influence on international relations, especially concerning leaders like Putin and Xi: “You want her to be president of the United States. She's not going up against Putin or Xi.”
Timestamp: [06:44 – End]
O’Reilly concludes with a mixed perspective on AOC:
Admiration for Ambition:
"A part of me admires the woman for getting out there and espousing whatever it is she is espousing. I like achievement. I like ambition."
Warnings About Ideological Extremes:
Concurrently, he cautions that her "ambition" may lead to "dangerous" policies, questioning her depth of knowledge and political strategy.
On AOC’s Economic Policies:
“She is a communist to me.” [00:35]
Regarding AOC’s Defamation of Trump:
“It's defamatory. And she should, at this point, have a little bit more than that, but she doesn't.” [06:44]
On AOC’s Political Future:
“She might be able to beat him [Schumer], that’ll be a hell of a race.” [06:44]
In this episode, Bill O’Reilly critically examines Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s political ideology, ambitions, and influence within the Democratic Party. He juxtaposes her progressive stances with his conservative viewpoints, labeling her and her allies as communists and expressing concerns over their economic and social policies. While acknowledging her popularity and ambition, O’Reilly warns of the potential dangers he perceives in her approach to governance and policy-making.
For listeners seeking a conservative analysis of AOC’s rise in American politics, this episode provides a comprehensive critique grounded in O’Reilly’s perspective on economic equality, property rights, and political strategy.
Note: This summary excludes the initial advertisements and promotional content, focusing solely on the substantive discussions between Bill O’Reilly and the embedded statements from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.