BONUS: Bill O'Reilly on Racism in Congress

Summary

Podcast Summary: BONUS: Bill O’Reilly on Racism in Congress

Podcast Information:

• Title: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
• Host: Bill O'Reilly
• Episode: BONUS: Bill O'Reilly on Racism in Congress
• Release Date: May 13, 2025
• Description: No Spin. Just Facts. Always looking out for you. Head to BillOReilly.com for more analysis.

---

Introduction

In this bonus episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, political commentator Bill O'Reilly delves into the sensitive and pressing issue of racism within the United States Congress. Released on May 13, 2025, the episode examines both overt and subtle forms of racism exhibited by elected officials, emphasizing the impact of racial biases on political dynamics and legislative processes.

---

Defining Racism in Congress: Threatening vs. Passive

Bill O'Reilly begins by categorizing racism into two distinct types:

1. Threatening Racism: This involves overt acts that are illegal, such as making threats based on race. O'Reilly mentions, “If somebody threatens you, you can have a cop arrest them if you record it and you got it on some proof of it” ([00:00]).

2. Passive Racism: This subtler form manifests in systemic biases and discriminatory practices that aren't necessarily illegal but perpetuate racial divisions. O'Reilly asserts, “People get elected in various districts around the country... All white districts who would never elect a black, and there are all black districts who would never elect a white” ([00:00]).

He highlights how passive racism is embedded in the electoral system, where racial biases influence voter behavior and candidate selection, often leading to homogenous representation.

---

Spotlight on Jasmine Crockett

O'Reilly spotlights Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas’s 30th District, located in the Dallas area. He critiques her approach to race and politics, suggesting she leverages racial issues to gain political advantage.

• O’Reilly’s Commentary: “She looks like she's using that race card to advance herself” ([02:10]).

• Crockett’s Statement (as played in the podcast): “It is this fear that the people within the party, within the primary system will have about voting a woman. Because every time we voted for a woman, we've lost so far. And I think that's a natural fear... Let's go find the safest white boy we can find” ([02:10]).

O'Reilly interprets Crockett’s comments as divisive, arguing that categorizing voters based on race undermines electoral diversity and perpetuates racial tension.

---

Critique of Ilhan Omar

The episode also criticizes Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District. O'Reilly describes her as a "rough" individual who makes unfounded accusations against white men.

• O’Reilly’s Commentary: “There isn't a statistic available anywhere in this country that says white men are causing most of the deaths” ([03:59]).

• Omar’s Statement (as played in the podcast): “Our country should be more fearful of white men... We should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men” ([03:37]).

O'Reilly challenges Omar’s claims by pointing out the lack of statistical evidence supporting her assertions, labeling her rhetoric as harmful and baseless.

---

Ro Khanna’s Counter-Perspective

In contrast to Crockett and Omar, O'Reilly introduces Representative Ro Khanna of California’s 17th Congressional District, highlighting his differing views on race and national pride.

• Khanna’s Statement (as played in the podcast): “White Americans have done enormous things for our freedom... I disagree politically. I disagree substantively. This is a great country... an Indian American son of immigrants, of Hindu faith to go represent the most economically prosperous place in the world” ([04:54]).

O'Reilly uses Khanna’s remarks to illustrate a more balanced view of American history and diversity, acknowledging the contributions of various ethnic groups while criticizing the focus on historical grievances.

---

Historical Context and O’Reilly’s Analysis

O’Reilly provides a historical framework to argue that focusing solely on America’s past injustices without context distorts contemporary perceptions of racism.

• O’Reilly’s Analysis: “You take a country that was founded by War, Revolution, 1776... and you take that country and you pick out the horrendous things that have happened in its history without any kind of context” ([05:31]).

He references his own works, such as Killing Lincoln and Killing Crazy Horse, to emphasize the importance of contextualizing historical events. O’Reilly contends that while acknowledging past atrocities is crucial, it should not overshadow the nation's achievements and progress.

He further asserts that present-day racial issues are being manipulated for political gain:

• O’Reilly on Modern Racism: “These people... use emotion, racial emotion, to advance themselves. That's wrong” ([05:31]).

---

Commentary on Extremism and Militia Movements

Towards the episode's conclusion, O’Reilly addresses the rise of extremism, contrasting perceptions with reality.

• O’Reilly’s Observation: “Extremism seems to be on the decline thanks to guys like Ro Khanna. And I salute you, Congressman” ([05:31]).

He references President Biden’s earlier statements about the dangers of right-wing militias, arguing that such groups are not as prevalent as portrayed and that minority groups like the Black Panthers are even less so, attributing the decline to constructive leadership from politicians like Khanna.

---

Conclusion

In this episode of No Spin News and Analysis, Bill O’Reilly presents a critical examination of racism within the U.S. Congress, distinguishing between overt discrimination and systemic biases. By spotlighting specific congresspeople and contrasting their approaches to race, O’Reilly advocates for a balanced understanding of America's history and contemporary challenges. He emphasizes the need to address racism without allowing historical grievances to overshadow the nation's progress and achievements. The episode underscores O’Reilly’s perspective that political motivations often exploit racial emotions, calling for a more fact-based and contextually informed discourse on race in America.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• Bill O'Reilly on Defining Racism: “A racist is somebody who makes judgments about important things based on skin color...” ([00:00]).

• Jasmine Crockett on Fear in Politics: “It is this fear that the people within the party... let's go find the safest white boy we can find” ([02:10]).

• Ilhan Omar on White Men: “Our country should be more fearful of white men...” ([03:37]).

• Ro Khanna on American Contributions: “White Americans have done enormous things for our freedom...” ([04:54]).

• O’Reilly on Historical Context: “You take a country that was founded by War, Revolution, 1776...” ([05:31]).

---

This comprehensive summary captures the essence of Bill O’Reilly’s discussion on racism in Congress, providing listeners with a clear understanding of his viewpoints, the arguments he presents, and the key figures he critiques.

Transcript

[Bill O'Reilly]

Important subject today. So in the Congress of the United States, there are racists. Not like there were before the Civil War and, you know, other times throughout our history, but there. There are racists. Both. All ethnic groups. And let me define what that is. So a racist is somebody who makes judgments about important things based on skin color, how you look, how you were born. And there are a lot of pejorative words, the N word. Every ethnic group has those words thrown at them, and it's all very disturbing. Now, there are two types of racism there. The racism that is threatening, and that's against the law. So if somebody threatens you, you can have a cop arrest them if you record it and you got it on some proof of it. The other racism is what I call passive racism. And this is where Congress comes in. So people get elected in various districts around the country by. There are all white districts who would never elect a black, and there are all black districts who would never elect a white. Not that many anymore, but they exist. So I'm going to spotlight three congresspeople tonight for you. First one is Jasmine Crockett. All right. She is a congressperson from Texas, 30th district. That's the Dallas area. It's been in Congress for two years. Young woman, and she really uses the race card a lot. Roll the tape.

[Jasmine Crockett]

It is this fear that the people within the party, within the primary system will have about voting a woman. Because every time we voted for a woman, we've lost so far. And I think that that's a natural fear, because we just want to win. So there's a lot of people that are like, you know what? Like, let's go find the safest white boy we can find. I mean, I'm just saying.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, safest white boy. All right, so if you said the safest black boy that you'd be, you'd lose your job. But Ms. Crockett feels that she can categorize people in these areas. I would like to interview her, but she'd never do it. But we'll put in a call, but she never come up against me. But she seems to be a smart woman. You know, it's like Ocasio Cortez in New York. These are not dumb people. But she looks like she's using that race card to advance herself. Second one is the infamous Ilan Omar. You know her, she'd been around since 2019, six years. Minnesota's fifth congressional. She's a rough, rough person. Roll a tape on her.

[Jasmine Crockett]

Our country should be more fearful of white men. Across our country because they are actually causing most of the deaths within this country. We should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men.

[Bill O'Reilly]

There isn't a statistic available anywhere in this country that says white men are causing most of the deaths. If you look at the FBI stats, that's not even close. Ms. Omar. But she doesn't care. Okay. She is hard for me to describe, but I don't think if I said she's hateful, that would be inaccurate. There's another guy, Ro Khanna. He is in California's 17th congressional district. That's Silicon Valley. He has been there since 2017, eight years. And Khanna is a Yale Law School grad. And Khanna's totally different on this stuff. Roll the tape.

[Ro Khanna]

Omar, too, in her. Just on a substantive level, I think that white Americans have done enormous things for our freedom. I mean, who were the people who scaled the cliffs of Normandy? Many of them were white men. And it's not just. I disagree politically. I disagree substantively. This is a great country. It is a kind country. It is a decent country. It is a country that has allowed an Indian American son of immigrants, of Hindu faith to go represent the most economically prosperous place in the world. That would not be possible anywhere else.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Now, if Ro Khanna can say something like that, which is absolutely true, how does Crockett and Omar answer? They answer by falling back on historical grievance. That's what this whole thing is about. So you take a country that was founded by War, Revolution, 1776, and then molded up until 1789 in a system of government based on a constitution, and you take that country and you pick out the horrendous things that have happened in its history without any kind of context. So I write history books. My first book was Killing Lincoln. And I put the Civil War and the slave trade into a context so that Abraham Lincoln, when he came in to be president, couldn't stop the war. And here's why he couldn't stop it. History. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. Okay? There were. There were absolute reasons why the south wanted to do what it did. Now, are those reasons defensible? No. You don't enslave human beings. I'm sorry. Doesn't matter what year it is. You don't. And then there were Native Americans. I rode Killing Crazy Horse, okay? And you could see the clash and how it developed, all right, between the whites who were moving west and the Native Americans who had a totally different lifestyle, totally different communities clashing with These Europeans, this is all history. And horrible things happened in our history. But you have to balance. Okay, so in the United States, as Khanna points out, frees billions of people. All over the world, billions of the big. Knocks out Hitler, knocks out Tojo in Japan, knocks out the Soviet Union, knocks out Saddam Hussein. I mean, who else do that? We had help and we did it. Our blood and treasure did it. But these people. And then you get into, well, you had slavery. So therefore, in the year 2025, Blacks are still persecuted in some cases. They are not a perfect world. But we have a now codified law that if you are a minority, not just African American, and you are getting hosed and you know a lawyer, you can do some severe damage to whoever persecuting you. I mean, severe damage. Now that doesn't justify people of color being treated disrespectfully. Doesn't. Okay? But again, it's not a perfect world. If I see that, I stop it no matter where it is. Just as a good Samaritan. I won't tolerate it. And I wish there were more people as assertive as I am. And I'm a powerful guy. I can do it. But you don't base your assessment of your country based upon what happened in the 19th century. That's insane. But these people, they don't even think about that. They use emotion, racial emotion, to advance themselves. You see what I'm talking about here? That's wrong. That's wrong. And there are white kooks who do that, but they don't get any traction. Isn't that. That's one thing I'm so happy about, that these right wing militia people and all of this, there's no traction there. Remember in the beginning of the Biden administration where Biden himself said, oh, the biggest danger of the country is right wing militia. And I'm going where I see thousands of people a year, I don't see any of these guys. Nobody lives near me. That's a white militia. Where are they? Oh, no, it's like the Black Panthers. Not a lot of Black Panthers around anymore. You know, extremism seems to be on the decline thanks to guys like Ro Khanna. And I salute you, Congressman.