
BillOReilly.com Bonus
Loading summary
John Doe
So the budget. You know, I'm a boring guy. I am. And I appreciate you guys listening to a boring guy. This is almost like some kind of help help network here to help boring guys like me. And the reason I'm a boring guy is because I got to pay attention to budgets and to politicians and what they do and why they do it. And it now, you don't have to do it because I do it. And then I report to you. But it takes a lot of my time. I could be doing fun stuff, but I'm not. I'm doing budget stuff. So the latest New York state budget proposal is $254 billion. Right? There are 20 million New Yorkers. So if you do the math, um, it's not even close. So it's 254 billion the state wants to spend this year, but there's only 20 million people. And half of those people are kids and old people who don't work. So how are we going to fund this? Well, we're not. And we go into debt and all that. So I asked my staff to look. Give me Florida, Texas, California. Let's compare. Florida, where hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are moving, has a $115 billion budget. New York, 254. Florida, 115. Florida's got more people, 23 million to 20. And their budget is 60% less than ours. How does that happen? Well, it's because Florida is bare bones, okay? They're not giving out all kinds of stuff free. And New York is. And that's what it's all about. Every social program, every this, every that. And that's how the Democrats in Albany keep their power. We will give you stuff if you vote for us. We don't care if it bankrupts the state. Let's look at California. Biggest state, 39 million. California has a $323 billion budget, more substantially than New York, but it's got 19 million more people pro capita. New York is the biggest spender, even more than nutty California, which are paying for dancing lessons, cooking lessons, you know, you name it. Giving undocumented aliens Medicaid. California. We do that in New York, too, but I don't know the extent of it. Okay, so this is a Ponzi scheme. This whole tax and spend stuff is a Ponzi scheme. These people want to get elected. They want power. The Democratic Party controls New York, California. The Republican Party controls Florida. In New York, the way Democrats get elected is promising the folks, many of whom are poor, particularly in New York. City entitlements. We will give you as much as we can give you if you vote for us. And the mean Republicans will not. It's as simple as that. And the Ponzi on it is the politicians have to know they're bankrupting the state and they have to know that hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are leaving because the taxes are too high and they're going to go up. Doesn't don't matter what Hochul tells you. Believe me. This real ID thing. So about money. It's all about getting you to pay more money for something. That's what it's about. And this is nationwide. So you're living in a state where you are paying an enormous amount of your take home pay to the government to bribe people to vote for them. That's it. And the catastrophe of it is not here yet. But it's coming whereby the state would go bankrupt. Their investments in bonds would be worthless. All of that because they can't possibly cover their expenditures. Just the MTA in New York City is such a scandal. Billions of dollars wasted on a public transportation system. That's what the congestion pricing thing is all about. Here. Here's more money so you can waste it or steal it. Nobody watching the mta. Who's watching it? Nobody. So I'm sorry to report it. It's not good. A lot of great things about New York. That's not one of them.
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Episode: BONUS: Bill O'Reilly on the Latest New York Budget Proposal
Release Date: May 8, 2025
In this bonus episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O'Reilly delves into the intricacies of the latest New York state budget proposal. Featuring insights from guest John Doe, the discussion provides a critical examination of New York's financial strategies compared to other states, shedding light on the broader implications for taxpayers and the state’s economic future.
John Doe opens the discussion by framing his role as a "boring guy" who dedicates his time to understanding and explaining complex budgetary matters to the listeners. He emphasizes the magnitude of New York’s budget:
John Doe [00:03]: "The latest New York state budget proposal is $254 billion."
He highlights the sheer scale of the proposed budget relative to the state's population, setting the stage for a deeper analysis of its sustainability and impact.
Doe breaks down the budget in the context of New York's population, pointing out a critical imbalance:
John Doe [00:05]: "There are 20 million New Yorkers... it's 254 billion the state wants to spend this year, but there's only 20 million people."
He notes that half of New Yorkers are either children or elderly, who typically do not contribute to the workforce, thereby straining the state's financial resources.
To contextualize New York's spending, Doe compares it with Florida and California's budgets and populations:
John Doe [00:10]: "Florida, where hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are moving, has a $115 billion budget... Florida's got more people, 23 million to 20. And their budget is 60% less than ours."
He further examines California, the largest state by population:
John Doe [00:15]: "California has a $323 billion budget, more substantially than New York, but it's got 19 million more people pro capita."
This comparison underscores New York's disproportionately high per capita spending:
Doe attributes New York's high spending to the Democratic Party's policies:
John Doe [00:20]: "Florida is bare bones, okay? They're not giving out all kinds of stuff free. And New York is. And that's what it's all about. Every social program, every this, every that."
He argues that New York's generous social programs are a strategic move by Democrats to maintain political power by offering extensive benefits to voters.
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the assertion that New York's financial model resembles a Ponzi scheme:
John Doe [00:25]: "This is a Ponzi scheme. This whole tax and spend stuff is a Ponzi scheme."
He contends that the state relies on continuous borrowing and increasing taxes to sustain its expenditures, without a viable plan to balance the budget long-term.
Doe addresses the repercussions of high taxes and excessive spending, particularly the exodus of residents seeking more favorable economic conditions:
John Doe [00:30]: "Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are leaving because the taxes are too high and they're going to go up."
He warns that without corrective measures, New York could face severe financial instability as the tax base erodes and debt accumulates.
Highlighting specific areas of mismanagement, Doe criticizes the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA):
John Doe [00:40]: "Just the MTA in New York City is such a scandal. Billions of dollars wasted on a public transportation system."
He links the budgetary issues to inefficiencies within the MTA, suggesting that funds are being squandered rather than invested in meaningful infrastructure improvements.
John Doe concludes his analysis by reiterating the unsustainable nature of New York's budget:
John Doe [00:50]: "It's not good. A lot of great things about New York. That's not one of them."
He emphasizes the urgent need for fiscal responsibility to prevent the state from descending into bankruptcy, calling on policymakers to reassess their spending strategies to ensure long-term economic health.
This episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis provides a compelling critique of New York's fiscal policies, juxtaposed against the budgetary approaches of other states. John Doe's incisive analysis underscores the challenges facing New York, particularly the risks of excessive spending and political maneuvering. Listeners are left with a clear understanding of the potential financial pitfalls and the imperative for reform to safeguard the state's future.
Note: The timestamps referenced correspond to the provided transcript segments for contextual accuracy.