BONUS: Bill O'Reilly Reports the TRUTH About the Organized Anti-ICE/Anti-Trump Protests

Summary

Podcast Summary: BONUS: Bill O’Reilly Reports the TRUTH About the Organized Anti-ICE/Anti-Trump Protests

Podcast Information:

• Title: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
• Host: Bill O'Reilly
• Episode: BONUS: Bill O'Reilly Reports the TRUTH About the Organized Anti-ICE/Anti-Trump Protests
• Release Date: June 20, 2025

---

Introduction

In this bonus episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly delves into the intricacies of the recent anti-ICE and anti-Trump protests, challenging mainstream narratives and unveiling what he perceives as the orchestrated nature behind these demonstrations. O’Reilly provides a critical analysis of the organization, funding, and media portrayal of these protests, positioning them against historical mass demonstrations such as those during the Vietnam War.

---

Organized vs. Organic Protests

Bill O’Reilly begins by addressing claims that recent anti-Trump protests are the largest in American history. He contends that this assertion is inaccurate, comparing them unfavorably to the mass demonstrations during the Vietnam War, which he describes as "organic" and driven by genuine public concern. In contrast, he argues that the current protests are meticulously organized by pressure groups, leading to a significant disparity in scale and authenticity.

"Some people say it was the biggest mass demonstration in American history. That's not true. The Vietnam War demonstrations were larger and they were what they call organic."
— Bill O’Reilly at [02:15]

---

Funding and Organization Behind the Protests

O’Reilly shifts focus to the financial underpinnings of the anti-Trump movement, highlighting significant contributions from influential figures and organizations. He cites Christy Walton, heir to the Walmart fortune, as a major financier, channeling millions into the protest efforts through the progressive group Indivisible.

"One of the big drivers behind this no Kings thing, which was organized three months ago, is Christy Walton. The heiress of the Walmart fortune pumped millions of dollars into it."
— Bill O’Reilly at [03:40]

Additionally, O’Reilly points out the involvement of the AFL-CIO, noting that the union has received over $59 million in federal grants, a portion of which has been funneled into organizing these demonstrations. He also mentions contributions from the American Federation of Teachers Action Network Fund and Black Voters Matter, emphasizing that these funds are used for logistical support such as acquiring protest lists, media purchases, organizing participants, and coordinating transportation.

"The AFL CIO has received more than 59 million in federal grants. And it pumped in a percentage of that... All were pumping money into the no Kings demonstration."
— Bill O’Reilly at [04:50]

---

Critique of Media Coverage

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to critiquing how mainstream media outlets report on these protests. O’Reilly is particularly critical of NBC News and MSNBC, using specific examples to underscore his point.

He references an NBC segment by David Noriega, portraying it as superficial and lacking depth. O’Reilly highlights the omission of discussions about the organized nature of the protests and the resultant arrests, suggesting that NBC’s coverage fails to present the whole picture.

"So it's like, this is NBC and it's why NBC's news brand is gone."
— Bill O’Reilly at [05:08]

Turning to MSNBC, O’Reilly examines Rachel Maddow’s commentary, accusing her of misunderstanding the nature of the protests. He argues that Maddow incorrectly labels the demonstrators as isolated or violent individuals, rather than acknowledging the organized efforts behind them.

"Rachel Maddow... thinks this demonstration was four months in the planning with maybe $100 million behind it."
— Bill O’Reilly at [05:58]

O’Reilly asserts that Maddow and similar media figures live in a "bubble" where their narratives are unfettered by factual accuracy, leading to biased reporting that undermines the credibility of the protests and inflames partisan tensions.

---

Public Sentiment and Political Implications

O’Reilly emphasizes that despite the perceived organization and funding, there remains substantial public opposition to Trump. He references exit polling data to suggest that a significant portion of the 75 million Americans who voted for Kamala Harris may have actually voted against Trump, indicating a complex voter sentiment landscape.

"75 million Americans voted for Kamala Harris. I believe, based on exit polling, more than half of those 75 million voted against Trump, not for Kamala."
— Bill O’Reilly at [06:15]

This, according to O’Reilly, underscores that the protests are not entirely representative of the general populace but are influenced by targeted efforts from well-funded groups. He posits that these orchestrated protests do not reflect a true grassroots movement but rather a controlled attempt to sway public opinion and political outcomes.

---

Concluding Remarks and Insights

In his concluding remarks, Bill O’Reilly summarizes his stance that the protests are a result of strategic planning and substantial financial backing, rather than spontaneous public dissent. He warns listeners about the pervasive influence of media and organized groups in shaping political narratives and public perception.

"The American people didn't know we got it, we know what's happening. So I thought you would."
— Bill O’Reilly at [07:30]

O’Reilly asserts that despite the extensive efforts by media and progressive groups to undermine Trump, these attempts have failed, as evidenced by Trump’s significant voter base and continued support. He frames this dynamic as part of a broader historical pattern of political maneuvering and media influence that shapes, rather than reflects, the true will of the American people.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Distinction Between Protest Types: O’Reilly differentiates current anti-Trump protests from historical mass movements, attributing the former to organized and financially backed efforts rather than organic public dissent.

2. Influential Funding Sources: The episode highlights significant financial contributions from individuals like Christy Walton and organizations such as the AFL-CIO, Indivisible, and others, suggesting a strategic allocation of resources to influence political outcomes.

3. Media Criticism: A central theme is the critique of mainstream media's portrayal of the protests, with O’Reilly accusing networks like NBC and MSNBC of biased reporting that fails to acknowledge the organized nature of the demonstrations.

4. Public Sentiment Complexity: O’Reilly underscores the complexity of voter sentiment, implying that despite the protests, a substantial number of Americans continue to support Trump, challenging the narrative that these demonstrations signify widespread public opposition.

5. Historical and Political Context: The analysis situates the current protests within a broader historical and political framework, examining the interplay between organized groups, media influence, and voter behavior.

---

Conclusion

In this comprehensive analysis, Bill O’Reilly presents a critical perspective on the recent anti-ICE and anti-Trump protests, emphasizing their organized and financially supported nature. He challenges mainstream media narratives, urging listeners to recognize the underlying forces shaping political discourse and public demonstrations. Through detailed examination and pointed critiques, O’Reilly seeks to provide an alternative viewpoint on the dynamics influencing contemporary American politics.

Transcript

[Richard Karn]

Hi, I'm Richard Karn and you may have seen me on TV talking about the world's number one expandable garden hose. Well, the brand new Pocket hose Copperhead with Pocket Pivot is here and it's a total game changer. Old fashioned hoses get kinks and creases at the spigot, but the Copperhead's pocket pivot swivels 360 degrees for full water flow and freedom to water with ease all around your home. When you're all done, this rust proof anti burst hose shrinks back down to pocket size for effortless handling and tidy storage. Plus your super light and ultra durable pocket hose Copperhead is backed with a 10 year warranty. What could be better than that? I'll tell you what an exciting radio exclusive offer just for you for a limited time. You can get a free Pocket Pivot and their 10 pattern sprayer with the purchase of any size Copperhead hose. Just text water to 64,000. That's water to 64,000 for your two free gifts with purchase W A T E R to 64,000.

[David Noriega]

By texting 64,000, you agree to receive recurring automated marketing messages from Pocket Hose. Message and data rates may apply. No purchase required. Terms apply. Available@pocket hose.com terms there are two big.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Stories, and if you go to billorilly.com we're all over the Iran Trump Israel thing way ahead on the story. But the no Kings thing, that is more of an investigative thing. And I want to tell you about what we found out because I think you'll find it interesting. So some people say it was the biggest mass demonstration in American history. That's not true. The Vietnam War demonstrations were larger and they were what they call organic. They weren't organized by pressure groups as the no Kings was. It's a big, big difference. People were genuinely worried, concerned and angry about the Vietnam War. This anti Trump stuff is ginned up. Not to say that there aren't millions of people who hate Trump. There are. Okay. But here's how it went down and I have to credit Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, who really has been looking at this and has come up with some interesting stuff. So one of the big drivers behind this no Kings thing, which was organized three months ago, again, not spontaneous, is Christy Walton. The heiress of the Walmart fortune pumped millions of dollars into it. And the group that takes the money is called Indivisible. All right, that's from the Pledge of Allegiance. Indivisible. I N D I V I S I B L E, It's a progressive group. Okay. They got all this money from a number of different concerns. We'll tell you about them. And then they organized four months ago, this protest. All right, before Trump did anything. I mean, wasn't he hardly in office yet? That's number one. Okay, so George Soros is Open Society foundation is involved, of course. And they pumped in about $3 million to Indivisible and since 2018, 7 million. So. So pumping millions of dollars into this crew. When I say crew, it's only a few people. And they make a lot of money, believe me. They're taking a lot of money out for themselves, but plenty of money left over to organize. In addition, the AFL CIO, the union, all right, pumped in $59 million it has received. The AFL CIO has received more than 59 million in federal grants. And it pumped in a percentage of that. I don't know exactly the percentage to this no Kings protest. They were the big money behind it, the AFL cio. So the federal government, the Trump administrator actually paid for. But it was Biden then. Okay, so the fl. CIO gets all his money from the feds and it pumps in to organize demonstrations against politicians it doesn't like. Very cute. Right? Nice scam. All right. Anyway, the American Federation of Teachers Action Network Fund, Black Voters Matter. All were pumping money into the no Kings demonstration. What does that mean? It means getting lists of people, buying media, organizing people to call people, be at this place at this time, chartering buses, making signs, all of that. Okay, again, not spontaneous. So you would think that the media would report that, right? No, no, not in America. No, no, no, no, no, no. Here's NBC News. David Noriega. This is a hard news story. June 12th. Go.

[David Noriega]

Yesterday, for example, I noticed immediately, as soon as people started gathering in the afternoon and into the evening, that there was a pretty sort of joyous, celebratory atmosphere to these gatherings. You know, across the street at the federal Building behind me, there were groups of people dancing, playing music.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Oh, yeah, David. You know, it's okay. No mention from David, at least in that segment of the 500+ people who were arrested in Los Angeles. No. So it's like, this is NBC and it's why NBC's news brand is gone. Boom. Okay, now, on the analysis side, the always reliable Rachel Maddow on MSNBC said this. Go.

[Rachel Maddow]

You have the president clearly just fundamentally politically unable to contend with the depth and breadth of feeling against him. Right. So these must be paid protesters or invaders from somewhere else. Or they must all be violent criminals or whatever. No, actually, this is St. Louis, right?

[Bill O'Reilly]

This is.

[Rachel Maddow]

This is America. No kings, yes queens. Right?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Like that.

[Rachel Maddow]

This is just us. It's who we are. And this is how we feel about you. I mean, this is Joplin, Missouri. This is Louisville, Kentucky, where thousands of people turned out. This is McHenry, Illinois. This is High Point, North Carolina. It is literally everywhere in this country. Americans in surprising numbers, in surprising places, turning out again and again and again and again to say, no, nope, we are not doing this. You are not taking over our country and turning us into a dictatorship. You are not going to be a king.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Now, that isn't even close to being true. And it's not that Maddow is lying. She believes what she wants to believe, all right? Doesn't care about researching it or anything like that. 75 million Americans voted for Kamala Harris. I believe, based on exit polling, more than half of those 75 million voted against Trump, not for Kamala. So it's not hard, particularly after the ICE raids and the border being sealed and all of that, not hard to get a Segment of the 75 million in Louisville or wherever to come out with a sign that's given to them and say, we don't like Trump. They didn't like Trump in November. They don't like him in June. It's not a shock. In fact, it's utterly predictable. But not to Ms. Mountain. This is a mass movement. It's so deceitful. And again, she's not. She doesn't get up in the morning and say, I'm going to lie. That's not what these people do. They live in a bubble. And the bubble is Trump is the devil. That's what they believe. And they are going to try to weave their commentary to prove that every single night. It doesn't matter what I just told you, that this demonstration was four months in the planning with maybe $100 million behind it. Think Rachel Maddow is going to mention that. In fact, she disparaged it. Okay, so these must be paid protesters. Well, they weren't paid as far as cash, but they were certainly organized by people who were paid. Maybe you want to point that out, madam, Just. Maybe just for the sake of being fair. But why would she be fair? Why? There's no reason. She makes a handsome living hating Trump and by extension, MAGA people and conservatives. Why would you want to be fair? That would not part of our lifestyle. So when you magnify that, it's not just her, I mean, like this is legion. These are tired. Newspapers do this. Television network do this. They're in the tank. And that is what we have seen for the past 10 years. And it hasn't worked. Trump got 80 million votes, okay? It hasn't worked. That's, that's the stunning part of, that's the history headline, that all of this deceit, all this propaganda, all of the lawfare, all of the attempt to destroy the man in a court, everything failed. Everything. That's the historical headline. The American people didn't know we got it, we know what's happening. So I thought you would. And I don't like to pick on Rachel Maddow. I mean, that's not what I'm in business to do. But she illustrated it very, very clearly, so that's why I used that soundbite. But there are a thousand miss Maddows in the media and maybe for Trump there might be a hundred, that whatever Trump does is the greatest thing, maybe 100. It's about 10 to 1 against.