Episode Summary: "Corruption Case Against NYC Mayor Eric Adams Dropped—Cuomo Poised for Comeback?"

Introduction

In the April 3, 2025 episode of "Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis," host Bill O’Reilly tackles two significant legal cases involving prominent New York politicians: the dismissal of the corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams and the ongoing lawsuit against former Governor Andrew Cuomo concerning his COVID-19 policies in nursing homes. O’Reilly provides a thorough analysis of these cases, offering his perspectives on the political ramifications and the individuals involved.

Dismissal of Corruption Case Against Mayor Eric Adams

O’Reilly opens the episode by addressing the dismissal of the criminal corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams. At the very start of the podcast ([00:00]), he states:

"Mayor Eric Adams is off the hook. To use a cliché, Federal Judge Dale Ho dismissed the criminal corruption case against the mayor."

O’Reilly emphasizes that the case's dismissal was influenced by former President Donald Trump’s preferences, suggesting political interference:

"It's what Donald Trump wanted. And Adams ought to send President Trump a big box of whatever Trump will want, probably Big Macs, okay?"

He further explains that the case was dismissed "with prejudice," meaning Adams cannot be retried for the same charges, and highlights the financial and reputational relief this brings to Adams:

"The judge dismissed the case with prejudice. And it really wasn't a big reason why. But we all know the reason. Trump did not want this prosecution coming out of the Department of Justice."

O’Reilly critiques Adams’s performance as mayor, asserting that this legal victory will not aid his reelection campaign:

"Adams has done such a poor job as mayor, which has nothing to do with this Turkish deal. And just to recap, in case you forgot..."

Allegations Involving the Turkish Consulate

Delving into the specifics of the allegations against Adams, O’Reilly recounts the controversy surrounding the Turkish consulate's opening in New York City:

"Eric Adams allegedly allowed the Turkish consulate in New York to open without a fire inspection and other inspections. In return, you got free trips to Turkey, hotels upgraded on airfare, you know, whatever."

He discusses the Department of Justice’s stance, which likened these actions to bribery:

"And the Fed said, no, that's akin to a bribe and we're charging you. That's what that was all about. And the judge, federal judge, said, we're not going to do it."

Despite acknowledging the "low level beef," O’Reilly questions the legitimacy of dismissing the charges:

"I can't find a real reason to do it. It's a low level beef, there's no doubt about that."

Implications for Eric Adams’s Political Future

O’Reilly predicts that the dismissal of the case will negatively impact Adams’s chances for reelection, asserting that voters perceive him as ineffective:

"He's got to be happy. Not going to help his reelection campaign. He's not going to be reelected."

He contrasts Adams with Andrew Cuomo, whom he believes is better positioned to reclaim political influence:

"Cuomo will win. Unfortunately for people who believe, and I'm going to get to this in a moment, that Andrew Cuomo is not a good public servant, not an honest man."

Andrew Cuomo and the Nursing Home COVID-19 Lawsuit

Transitioning to the second major topic, O’Reilly discusses the lawsuit against former Governor Andrew Cuomo regarding his COVID-19 policies in nursing homes. He outlines the core issue of Cuomo’s directive that allowed COVID-positive patients back into nursing homes, which allegedly led to increased mortality rates:

"During COVID the governor, then Governor Cuomo said, hey, even if you have Covid or had it, you can go back to the nursing home. Nursing home can't keep you out. And so a lot of people died in the nursing homes from COVID."

O’Reilly explains that eight individuals sued the state government but made a procedural error by filing the case in federal court instead of state court. This mistake allowed Judge Katherine Polk Failla to dismiss the case based on improper venue:

"But they made a mistake in filing in federal court and that gave the judge, Katherine Polk Failla, the excuse to throw the case out. Wrong venue. This is a state beef."

He criticizes the dismissal, questioning the competence of those representing the plaintiffs and the handling of the case:

"I don't know about that. That is a shocking ruling that Cuomo made. Terrible ruling and never apologized for it."

O’Reilly notes that although the case was dismissed due to a procedural error, it has the potential to be refiled in the appropriate state court, leaving its ultimate fate uncertain:

"Now, the case can be brought back. So the judge didn't dismiss it entirely. She said did not beat the high bar of shocking public conscience and it was the wrong venue. Okay, well, I was shocked."

Political Ramifications and Predictions

O’Reilly assesses the broader political implications of these legal developments. He argues that despite Cuomo’s missteps, voter perception remains favorable towards his governance capabilities, attributing his potential comeback to the strong support of the Democratic machine:

"the perception by many voters is that Cuomo knows how to govern, even though he's made these terrible mistakes, and that Adams does not know how to govern."

He contrasts this with Adams’s declining political capital, suggesting that Adams’s legal troubles and perceived ineffectiveness will hinder his prospects:

"And that is why I believe Cuomo will wax him in the June Democratic primary."

O’Reilly underscores the disparity in political support between Cuomo, backed by the Democratic establishment, and Curtis Lewo, the Republican challenger, who lacks similar backing:

"Curtis Lewo be the Republican running against him does not have a machine. It's a grassroots movement. Curtis knows that and he knows he has to raise a tremendous amount of money."

Notable Quotes

• Dismissal of Adams's Case:

  "[00:00] Mayor Eric Adams is off the hook. To use a cliché, Federal Judge Dale Ho dismissed the criminal corruption case against the mayor."

• Influence of Trump:

  "It's what Donald Trump wanted. And Adams ought to send President Trump a big box of whatever Trump will want, probably Big Macs, okay?"

• Allegations of Bribery:

  "Eric Adams allegedly allowed the Turkish consulate in New York to open without a fire inspection and other inspections."

• Criticism of Cuomo's Ruling:

  "That is a shocking ruling that Cuomo made. Terrible ruling and never apologized for it."

• Voter Perception:

  "the perception by many voters is that Cuomo knows how to govern, even though he's made these terrible mistakes."

Conclusion

In this episode, Bill O’Reilly provides a critical analysis of the legal challenges facing New York’s political figures, Mayor Eric Adams and former Governor Andrew Cuomo. He highlights the dismissal of Adams’s corruption case as a politically motivated decision influenced by Donald Trump, predicting detrimental effects on Adams’s reelection bid. Simultaneously, O’Reilly discusses the ongoing lawsuit against Cuomo, critiquing the procedural mishandling that led to its dismissal and questioning the efficacy of Cuomo’s policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

O’Reilly concludes with a forecast that Andrew Cuomo is poised for a political resurgence, leveraging his established support within the Democratic machine, while Eric Adams’s political future appears bleak due to legal vulnerabilities and perceived incompetence. This analysis underscores the interplay between legal proceedings and political fortunes, illustrating how court decisions can significantly influence electoral outcomes.