Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - August 1, 2025

Summary

Summary of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis: Highlights from August 1, 2025

Release Date: August 2, 2025

Bill O’Reilly’s podcast, No Spin News and Analysis, delivered a comprehensive and engaging discussion in the episode titled "Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - August 1, 2025." The episode delved into the declining approval ratings of the Democratic Party, the impact of the Biden administration's policies, media bias, and significant political investigations. This summary captures all key points, discussions, insights, and conclusions presented during the episode.

---

1. Democratic Party's Plummeting Approval Ratings

Wall Street Journal Poll Findings

At the outset, O’Reilly addressed a Wall Street Journal poll surveying 1,500 registered voters, revealing that the Democratic Party holds its lowest approval rating in 35 years.

• Favorable vs. Unfavorable Opinions:

  • Favorable: 33%
  • Unfavorable: 63%

• Comparison with the Republican Party:

  • Favorable: 43%
  • Unfavorable: 54%

• Approval of President Donald Trump’s Performance:

  • Approve: 46%
  • Disapprove: 52%

O’Reilly remarked, “Wow. Okay. So you're going back into the 1990s... it’s not a good situation for the Democrats.”

Reasons for the Decline

O’Reilly outlined several factors contributing to the Democratic Party’s declining popularity:

• Open Border Policy:

  • Instituted by President Biden, this policy has reportedly cost American taxpayers $182 billion annually.
  • An estimated 12 million people have crossed into the United States under this policy.
  • O’Reilly criticized Biden for not explaining the policy, stating, “Biden never even told us why he was doing.”

• Economic Concerns:

  • Under Biden, inflation reached 9%, currently reduced to approximately 6%.
  • Regulatory measures on the fossil fuel industry are blamed for supply chain disruptions and increased costs.
  • O’Reilly noted, “Regulations... crippled supply lines.”

• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI):

  • The podcast emphasized that Americans are opposed to favoritism based on skin color and uncomfortable with trans men competing with women.
  • O’Reilly asserted, “DEI favors groups,” highlighting widespread public disapproval.

• Public Safety and High Taxes:

  • Cities under Democratic leadership, such as San Francisco, Chicago, and New York, face significant crime challenges.
  • States like California, Hawaii, and New York rank among the top five highest in taxes, adversely affecting working-class Americans.

• Welfare Expansion:

  • Biden’s policies have added 20 million Americans to welfare rolls, costing $760 billion annually.
  • Additional costs arise from undocumented individuals receiving welfare benefits.
  • O’Reilly criticized Biden as “the biggest spending president in history.”

Lack of Democratic Leadership

O’Reilly expressed skepticism about the Democratic Party's ability to recover, citing a lack of a clear leader or face for the party. He mentioned figures like Barack Obama, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Bernie Sanders, labeling the latter two as “communist people,” which undermines broad appeal.

Midterm Elections Outlook

Looking ahead to the midterms, O’Reilly emphasized the pivotal role of Trump, stating, “As I said in the opening, with these trade deals... Democrats are not happy.”

---

2. In-Depth Interview with John Solomon on Russian Collusion Investigations

Overview of the Investigation

O’Reilly welcomed John Solomon from Washington to discuss the ongoing investigations into alleged Russian collusion during the Obama administration. The conversation focused on the origins and progression of the investigation, implicating key figures like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, and James Comey.

Key Points Discussed:

• Initial Intelligence Intercepts:

  • On July 26, 2016, U.S. intelligence intercepted Russian communications suggesting Hillary Clinton orchestrated a fake scandal to divert attention from her email issues and target Donald Trump.
  • Solomon stated, “Hillary Clinton had personally approved a plan to demonize President Donald Trump.”

• FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation:

  • Prompted by donations from Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, who had ties to the Clinton Foundation, the FBI initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
  • Solomon highlighted procedural concerns, noting that investigations were based on unverified information.

• Obama’s Involvement:

  • President Obama convened a national security meeting, assembling top officials like John Brennan and James Comey to establish a fusion center aimed at investigating Russian interference.
  • Solomon pointed out, “Barack Obama presided over meetings discussing Russian collusion with officials who allegedly falsified information.”

• Steele Dossier and Its Impact:

  • On July 5, 2016, coinciding with FBI Director James Comey’s decision to clear Clinton, Christopher Steele presented the first version of his dossier to the FBI, which later escalated the investigation.

• Shift in Intelligence Assessment:

  • In September, an intelligence community consensus suggested minimal effort by Vladimir Putin to influence the election outcome favoring either candidate.
  • However, in December, Obama ordered a new intelligence assessment that contradicted previous findings, reigniting suspicions of manipulation.

Implications and Potential Legal Actions:

O’Reilly and Solomon discussed the insufficient grounds to indict Obama but highlighted substantial evidence against Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, and James Comey. Solomon mentioned, “Comey’s got a lot of issues at this point,” suggesting potential legal repercussions.

Upcoming Revelations:

Solomon teased forthcoming disclosures, including a classified annex of the Durham report, which may reveal that the FBI was aware of Hillary Clinton’s intentions to fabricate the Trump scandal.

---

3. Media Bias and Its Impact on Public Perception

O’Reilly criticized the corporate media for favoring left-leaning perspectives, contributing to the Democratic Party’s challenges. He presented statistics highlighting the imbalance in political guests on late-night comedy shows:

• Late-Night Shows:

  • Since 2022, hosts like Stephen Colbert have featured predominantly left-leaning guests, with only one Republican (Liz Cheney) appearing.
  • O’Reilly emphasized, “99% of political guests on late-night comedy shows lean left.”

• Effect on Public Opinion:

  • The dominance of liberal voices creates a “propaganda bubble,” leading uninformed audiences to adopt leftist viewpoints without exposure to moderate or conservative perspectives.

• Impact on Ratings and Representation:

  • O’Reilly argued that the lack of conservative representation limits diverse viewpoints, potentially skewing public perception and discourse.

---

4. Listener Statistics and Cultural Observations

The episode also featured a segment on various statistics illustrating societal behaviors and attitudes:

• Automotive Skills:

  • A Finance Buzz poll revealed that only 48% of Americans can change a tire, with higher proficiency among Gen Z compared to older generations.
  • Additionally, 64% need help changing oil, and 73% cannot change spark plugs.

• Moral Choices:

  • According to Gamble Lizard, 43% of Americans would leave their romantic partner for $1 million, and 15% would frame a friend for a crime for the same amount.

O’Reilly connected these statistics to themes in his upcoming book, Confronting Evil, suggesting that a significant portion of the population harbors unethical tendencies.

---

5. Final Thoughts and Predictions

Concluding the episode, O’Reilly shared personal reflections on the movie industry, expressing disappointment with recent releases and reminiscing about classic films. He made light-hearted predictions about future content and encouraged listener interaction by inviting recommendations for good movies.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Bill O’Reilly on Democratic Decline:

  • “The Democratic Party is having so much trouble is its lack of problem solving.” (02:15)

• John Solomon on Intelligence Intercepts:

  • “Hillary Clinton had personally approved a plan to demonize President Donald Trump.” (07:27)

• O’Reilly on Media Bias:

  • “99% of political guests on late-night comedy shows lean left.” (33:52)

---

Conclusion

Bill O’Reilly’s episode provided a critical analysis of the Democratic Party's waning support, the complexities of political investigations into Russian collusion, and the pervasive influence of media bias. By incorporating expert insights from John Solomon and presenting compelling statistics, the podcast offered listeners a detailed examination of contemporary political dynamics and societal trends.

For more in-depth analysis and updates, listeners are encouraged to visit BillOReilly.com.

Transcript

[Bill O'Reilly]

Foreign Some good news over the weekend for a change, Trump got some deals made in Europe and the economy looks like it's poised to do pretty well the rest of the year. Of course, you never know. Some of my friends are exuberant about the stock market. I urge caution. Okay. Don't dive in until you're sure you know what you want to do. But anyway, we'll get to that coming up. But first, a Wall Street Journal poll about the Democratic Party, and that is the subject of this evening's Talking Points Memo. So? So the Wall street journal surveyed 1500 registered voters and they found out that the Democratic Party gets the lowest approval rating in 35 years. Wow. Okay. So you're going back into the 1990s, I guess after Bill Clinton or probably before. Probably before Bill Clinton, but I don't know what year it was. But anyway, it's not a good situation for the Democrats. So let's get specific. First question, do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party? Favorable. 33. Unfavorable. 63. Wow. Now this includes independents and Republicans, of course, but that's a big number. Favorable, unfavorable opinion. Republican Party. Favorable. 43. Unfavorable. 54. Approve or disprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as president? Approve. 46. Disapprove. 52. So it's a judgmental crowd here. Doesn't seem to be an ideological crowd in this Wall Street Journal poll. I think that's a fair assessment. Now let's get to the reasons. The primary reason Democratic Party is having so much trouble is its lack of problem solving. So it's not a conservative, liberal situation. Yes, the far left dominates the party and it has damaged the Democrats in a very profound way. No doubt about that. But it's a problem solving situation. So let's run it down. The biggest problem that we've had in this country after Covid is the open border. And that policy was instituted by President Biden with no dissent from the Democratic Party. It is costing the American taxpayer $182 billion every year, every year to deal with this problem. 728 billion under Biden. Four years. So we're going to get into the trillions. All right, 12 million people. That's a low estimate of how many crossed into the United States under Biden's look the other way policy, which he has never explained, by the way. And that's another big reason that Americans are not bullish on the Democratic Party. Biden never even told us why he was doing. All we heard was the board is secure. Of course it wasn't secure. And the amount of narcotics that poured in, he was record breaking. And we're seeing that every day in crime, in the streets and drug overdoses. Secondly, the economy. So under Joe Biden, inflation hit a incredible 9%. It's down about 3% now. Okay, 9%, because Biden slapped regulations on the fossil fuel industry across the board that crippled supply lines. Okay? Made it much more expensive to get food and other items to the stores. And it drove prices up. You remember the ships backed up in the ports, that the grocery stores just ramming everything up. Restaurants, all of that because they couldn't get the supplies in. And that was because all the regulations that the Biden administration put on trucking and gasoline and harvesting is crazy. Then diversity, equity, inclusion, dei. Americans don't want this. Every poll shows it. They don't want it. They do not want favoritism based on skin color. Okay? Period. And they don't want trans men competing with women. And the Democratic Party embraces that all across the board. Urban crime cities like San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Louisiana, all in huge trouble. They cannot protect their citizens. Public safety has collapsed. All of them are under Democratic leadership. High taxes. Top five tax states in the union. California, Hawaii, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, all Democrats. And working men and women are gouged. They have no money. And finally, welfare expansion. Under President Biden, 20 million Americans were added to the welfare rolls, costing $760 billion a year. And that doesn't count the undocumented who were receiving or are receiving welfare payments. Biden was the biggest spending president in history. So you add that all up, and that's why the party is not doing well among the American population. Now, what about a turnaround? Well, it's impossible now because there's no leader of the Democratic Party. There's no face. All right, I guess Barack Obama is still the most powerful Democrat, but he's not really actively involved. And there are some governors are going to run in 28, but nobody knows who they are. Most famous Democrat outside of Barack Obama is probably Ocasio Cortez or Bernie Sanders. And these are communist people. I mean, you know, so, you know, I'm a Democrat. It's going to be a tough road going forward. Midterms, you know, it's all about Trump in the midterms. Do Americans, are they fed up with him or not? But it looks like, as I said in the opening, that the economy, you know, with these trade deals and all that so Democrats are not happy. And that is a memo. And joining us now from Washington is the aforementioned John Solomon. All right, so this all began with Tulsi Gabbard, Director of Intelligence, putting forth that, you know, there may be some criminal charges here. The media has largely ignored it on the left and the right wing media is, you know, stoked it. Would that be accurate so far?

[John Solomon]

That is a complete accurate picture.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yep, Yep. You're not going to get this in a Washington Post, New York Times network news. Let's start with the most important person in the investigation, President Obama.

[John Solomon]

Yes.

[Bill O'Reilly]

What do we know about his participation, or lack thereof, in the Russian collusion story?

[John Solomon]

Well, we know from the evidence that's now public, which we didn't all see years ago when this began unraveling, is that in late July of 2016, right after Hillary Clinton was cleared in the email case, even though there had just been new evidence surfaced that maybe she had been compromised in her email, they didn't investigate. They clear them. She makes a pivot. The Russian government intercepts her aides talking about she's approved a plan to fake a Russian scandal to change the dialogue from her emails to Donald Trump's alleged complicity with Russia.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Let me stop you there.

[John Solomon]

Yeah.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So this came out of the. A Russian informant. Is that what we believe?

[John Solomon]

It's in the way it's been described, John, by John Durham is. It looks like it's a highly classified program of intercepts. We probably intercepted their intelligence or their people being briefed on intelligence.

[Bill O'Reilly]

According to Durham, the special counsel, U.S. intel intercepted some Russian chat about. Okay, that said Hillary Clinton knew and wanted a phony story about Donald Trump. Do I have that right?

[John Solomon]

That's right. And specifically, specifically to end the conversation about our email scandal. That's the part that's very important.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right. They would divert attention away from. All right now, you would have to then see what the intercept was and put it in context in order to, you know, condemn Hillary Clinton. So, Barack Obama, this episode is brought to you by LifeLock. When you visit the doctor, you probably hand over your insurance, your ID and contact details. It's just one of the many places that has your personal info. And if any of them accidentally expose it, you could be at risk for identity theft. LifeLock monitors millions of data points a second. If you become a victim, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first [e-mail] podcast terms apply. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast. And I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about the juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NYPOST podcast, listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Then what's his participation?

[John Solomon]

So that intercept is made by the United states government on July 26, 2016. On July 28, just two days later, the CIA director at the time, John Brennan, was so concerned about what the Russians knew and the specific specificity of it, that he decided to brief President Barack Obama directly. That's unusual because if you thought it was disinformation, you're not going to waste the President's time on it.

[Bill O'Reilly]

How do we know. How do we know that Brennan debriefed Obama on this story?

[John Solomon]

We have a record of the meeting on the President's schedule, and then on John Brennan comes out of that meeting and writes notes. And we have the direct notes of what John Brennan told the president. That John Brennan wrote in his notes.

[Bill O'Reilly]

What did he tell Barack Obama?

[John Solomon]

That there was foreign intelligence. That Hillary Clinton had personally approved a plan to demonize President Donald Trump by suggesting he was in cahoots with Russia to hijack the 2016 election.

[Bill O'Reilly]

What they say, what was Obama's reply to what Brennan told him?

[John Solomon]

We don't know. Barack Obama's never been questioned. And John Brennan says he doesn't quite recall much about.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Doesn't recall. Right. Where did Brennan say he doesn't recall?

[John Solomon]

He was questioned in Congress, I believe, in 2023 by Matt Gaetz, and he's a little vague on that. There's also some references in the Durham report. They're a little cryptic. And so one of the things we think should be released soon, we're working to get is the actual transcript of John Durham's eight hour interview with John Brennan. We think that could be an important piece of evidence, obviously.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, so let's advance the story now. So you got Brennan debriefing Obama on Russian intercepts that accuse Hillary Clinton of fabricating a story to damage Trump. What happens after President Obama hears that from Brennan?

[John Solomon]

In the six day period that follows that briefing, there's an extraordinary amount of activity. First, an Australian diplomat that has a long relationship with the Clintons. His name is Alexander Downer. He. He had donated a large amount of Australian tax dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Longtime friend of the Clintons. He comes forward and tells the fba, Oh, I remember this conversation from May. And I think the Trump campaign might have been working with Russia to hack the election. The very storyline that the Russians are actually intercepting that Hillary Clinton says that's gonna be the fake story. He comes forward based on that information. The FBI opens the crossfire hurricane investigation.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, so a friend of the Clintons. Friend of the Clintons tells who the FBI is that to the FBI.

[John Solomon]

He goes to the FBI, volunteers a report.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, this is James Comey. He says that he has information that the Russian intercept is bull. That there was a real.

[John Solomon]

No, what he said. No, actually, what he's saying is back in May, he had an interaction with a Trump staffer. I believe it's George Papadopoulos. And he walked away from that conversation thinking that George Papadopoulos might have been hinting that might have been.

[Bill O'Reilly]

I got it.

[John Solomon]

I got.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So he's trying to reinforce the validity of the story.

[John Solomon]

That's right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So Comey then opens an investigation. Right?

[John Solomon]

That's right. Pete Strzok. Right. That's the agent who does it.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And then what happens after that?

[John Solomon]

Three days after the investigation's open, President Obama convenes a national security meeting in the Situation Room. And there he brings in his top people. John Brennan, James Clapper. James Comey. Very important that he's in that meeting. And he orders that a fusion cell be stood up to begin investigating whether Russia is working with Donald Trump or on its own to influence the election.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, let's stop there. So Obama convenes a meeting. Right. All right, all. And what was Clapper, Director of National Intelligence. Did he have anything to do with this? Did he contribute anything to this?

[John Solomon]

He's part of the effort to set up that fusion cell. He's the top intelligence officer in the land, so supervising the project.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But his crew intercepted the Russian thing that.

[John Solomon]

The CIA did the intercept. Yeah. So one down from him. CIA is one of those agencies that report up to Clapper. The CIA is the one who gets that intercept and then alerts.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, but Clapper knew about it. Is Clapper refuting it or saying, no, it's real. Do we know?

[John Solomon]

We don't know. We don't know.

[Bill O'Reilly]

We don't know Clapper's opinion.

[John Solomon]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So Obama's got all his guys in there, and they're all talking about this back and forth so far. If I were president, I'd have my guys in there, too.

[John Solomon]

Sure.

[Bill O'Reilly]

I would be talking about this. Right, wouldn't I? Agree.

[John Solomon]

Okay, I would.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, so so far we have Brennan little nebulous. We have Hillary accused of the mastermind of all this.

[John Solomon]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Then after the meeting, Homie carries on his investigation, right?

[John Solomon]

Yes, sir, he does.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Does he come to a conclusion?

[John Solomon]

He, he decides that it is worth by September escalating to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FISA court, the special.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Spy court, two months before the election.

[John Solomon]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Homie uses this unverified information that's been challenged by the Russian intercept to get warrants to what, eavesdrop on. On the Trump campaign.

[John Solomon]

That's right. Specifically Carter Page, which would give him a backdoor into the entire Trump campaign in Russia. So two weeks, two months before they're spying on the opposition party's campaign.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Did Comey ever explain why he used unverified information to get a court appointed wire?

[John Solomon]

He has said that he thought it met the standards for the FISA warrant. We now know from Standards. Okay, that's right. We now know it didn't meet the standards.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Right, of course. All stories phony.

[John Solomon]

All right, that's right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah.

[John Solomon]

From the beginning.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But then Obama, did he step back back and let the FBI do what they do or did he get involved further?

[John Solomon]

He stays out of it all the way through the election. Obviously, Donald Trump does the, I think unthinkable for Democrats. He beats Hillary Clinton. Right. And then there's a very important pivot after that.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, well, I'll get to that in a moment. So from the time he held his cabinet meeting about the Russian collusion accusation to election day, Barack Obama really didn't have any kind. He wasn't.

[John Solomon]

None that we know of. We don't know of any other events. Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

He wasn't proactive. And you'd have to have a whistleblower come up and say, that's right, that he did. You know, he was behind it. All right, so after Trump beats Clinton, then Barack Obama swings into some kind of action. What was that?

[John Solomon]

Let me give you two other little data points because I think they're going to be important as we go down this map. I don't want to lose the timeline for people.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay.

[John Solomon]

July 5th is the day that James Comey magically waved his magic wand and said, I'm absolving Hillary Clinton. The FBI doesn't have the right to do that. But he did it. We all remember it's July 5th.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Right.

[John Solomon]

And remember what the Russians intercepted, that this was a pivot point that Hillary want to change the Conversation from her email scandal to a fake Donald Trump scandal. That same day, July 5, 2016, the same day she knows James Comey is clearing her, Christopher Steele walks into the FBI with the first version of his dossier. So literally on the exact same day, when people look and say, boy, these are some coincidences that are serious. The day that she's getting absolved is the day she starts the Steele dossier. She's paid for the Steele dossier.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Steele walks in and that process, circumstantial evidence, is overwhelming.

[John Solomon]

Yeah, it's pretty big. Okay, one more date. Why Obama was sitting present, not doing anything. In September, the intelligence community, James Clapper, James Brennan, all The experts, all 17 intelligence agencies say, listen, there's some evidence that Russia did the hacking on Hillary Clinton's emails. They're doing some typical countermeasures we normally see. But we do not believe that Vladimir Putin is trying to pick one candidate over the other. That is the assessment of all 17 agencies. So the belief is, all right, there might have been some normal funny business that Russia does every time, but they're just trying to sow mischief. They're not trying to pick one candidate over the other. What is the assessment?

[Bill O'Reilly]

What did Brennan and Clapper say about that consensus? Anything on the record?

[John Solomon]

They delivered it. They were the ones who delivered to the president. So they didn't commute it?

[Bill O'Reilly]

No, not at all.

[John Solomon]

Okay, not at all.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, so then in December, President Elect Trump is gathering his crew and Barack Obama reinserts himself into this. What does he does?

[John Solomon]

There's an incredible moment that occurs just before he gets activated over the Thanksgiving holiday. So late November 2016, the intelligence community comes back and said, we think we were right. It is clear that Vladimir Putin didn't try to sway the election towards Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. In fact, the best evidence of it is what's happened in October. In October of 2016, when most Americans are making up their mind about who they're going to pick. They're going to. The debates are going on. That's majority Americans decide last minute, Vladimir Putin withdrew all of his countermeasures in the United States. He was not trying to drop any more. Damaging. Damaging.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And Obama acknowledges all of this?

[John Solomon]

Well, it's briefed, right? It is briefed. So on the end of November, the Gang of Eight in Congress is briefed on this, which is our assessment that we gave you and the president in September appears to be accurate. And the best evidence is that last month of the election, Vladimir Putin pulled out. He had more shots he could have fired at Hillary Clinton. He doesn't fire them. He holds them back. And in fact, he seems resigned in October that he was going to have Hillary Clinton as a president. They briefed that to Congress, and now they're about to brief it to Obama. They're supposed to tell obama that on December 9th. And a funny thing happens. Obama convenes a meeting on December 5, approximately, and decides he wants a new intelligence assessment. The one he was about to get. We don't know. We don't know the reason.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So he doesn't like this one. He wants another one.

[John Solomon]

No one doesn't like this one. That's right. And Congress has already been given the ability to.

[Bill O'Reilly]

How do we know that? How do we know that Obama wanted a new intelligence assessment of Russian collusion?

[John Solomon]

In the just declassified House Intelligence Committee report that did a review of this whole episode, there is a specific executive order that the House Intelligence Committee was shown showing that Barack Obama ordered a new intelligence.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, what does that indicate? So maybe he just wanted to be 100% correct, or, you know, is there two possibilities?

[John Solomon]

Yeah, two possibilities from the testimony of people that we've been able to read. One is there were people who just didn't like that assessment. They wanted to push the narrative. Yeah, Donald Trump cheated to win. There are other people. When the president hears this, other people say, well, the president's hearing that from some people and he sees the intelligence community. He's got two different sides of the story. He wants everybody to go back, look more time. Yeah. And that could be a reasonable thing to do. I'm Piers Morgan, the host of the Piers Morgan Uncensored Podcast. We do big interviews and we do big debates about whatever's getting people talking. We make news, we make noise, and we make a little bit of trouble, too. Come and see what all the fuss is about.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You can listen to Piers Morgan uncensored.

[John Solomon]

On Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Hey, Mike Baker here, host of the President's Daily Brief podcast. If you want straight talk on national security, foreign policy, and the biggest global stories going on of the day, this is the show for you. We publish twice a day, Monday through Friday, once in the morning, again in the afternoon, and on the weekend, we go longer with the PDB Situation Report with excellent guests including national security insiders and foreign policy experts. Check us out on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts. Also on our YouTube channel at PresidentsDaily Brief. So far, I haven't heard anything about Barack Obama. That's gonna get him indicted by a federal grand jury. I have heard that Hillary Clinton is in big trouble. Brennan, you would have to have. In the report that you just referred to, which is a majority report, it was written by Republicans, but there was no dissent from the Democrats on the committee, and Schiff was the head of that. No written dissent at all?

[John Solomon]

No, none.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Because I had to argue with Cuomo about that. But anyway, what's the most damning evidence against Brennan?

[John Solomon]

So when he takes over this new assessment, the normal way you do it is you bring all 17 people back to the chair, you get your 17 intelligence. Let's all come together and let's give the President the best thing. He doesn't do that. He cuts everybody out of the picture, except for the CIA, who he runs, the FBI, who James Comey runs, and the nsa, who's run by a guy named Admiral Mike Rogers, who, by the way, warns President Trump in a meeting during the transition that I think the intelligence community may be spying on you, so be careful. Maybe you should move out of New York and go to Washington. Very important moment. He had concerns about what was going on. So instead of on the full assessment, John Brennan brings it down to the two agencies that have been pursuing Trump for the last years, and then Mike Rogers, the NSA guy, and they do a rush job. They handpick their own people. They don't let the agencies pick their people, and they inject into. To get to the point that they need to or to get to the point that they ultimately decide on that, they're gonna flip the conclusion. No, Vladimir Putin really was helping Donald Trump. They have to do two.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So the new assessment that Obama ordered says that all of the other evidence is wrong, that Putin did try to undermine the election. Correct?

[John Solomon]

That's right. That is correct. That's.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So, Brett, Lady Brennan has some debt. Looks like he's a clapper. I don't know if he's got a deficit or not. Do you think he's in trouble?

[John Solomon]

Don't know yet. Okay, well, listen, he would know what was going on.

[Bill O'Reilly]

He had to know what was going on, whether he promoted it or not.

[John Solomon]

That's right. That's right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And then Comey had to know what was going on, too, right?

[John Solomon]

He definitely. Because he is the guy that wants the Steele dossier put into the ica. The intelligence assessment. There's two things in the assessment that according to the John Durham report and now the House Intelligence Committee report, that leaned into the notion that Vladimir Putin put his finger on the scale for Trump. The first is the Steele dossier, which was the idea. It was, and by the way, totally made up. It was already known to be phony. Christopher Steele's.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But he wanted it. Comey wanted it in the record anyway. That's indefinite.

[John Solomon]

Shannon does that. Yeah, that's. And Brennan pushes his staff. Brennan's staff tells him, we've seen the emails. This would be a disgrace to the Intelligence Committee to put this in an official assessment. It would harm all the other good work we've done. He orders it. He says, I don't care. You're putting it in.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right. And then there's one other thing. So it's a lot for the audience to absorb.

[John Solomon]

It is. It is.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So here's from what you have just told me, and I'm not challenging any of what you just told me, I think it's 100% accurate. It looks to me like there's not enough to go after Obama at this point.

[John Solomon]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

There is enough to go after Hillary Clinton. Yep. There is enough to go after Brennan.

[John Solomon]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Clapper. Not enough. Right now. There is enough. So it would be.

[John Solomon]

Yeah, Comey. Comey's got a lot of issues at this point.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Brennan and Comey would be the three that you could bring into a grand jury, a federal grand jury, and say they committed a massive fraud violating every election law.

[John Solomon]

Yep.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay.

[John Solomon]

And let me mention something that people say about Barack Obama. It's based on the evidence. And again, this is the contrarian side to that. I could argue Barack Obama would do what a president would do if there was conflict in front of him. The one thing that Barack Obama. We don't have an answer to. We need to press him. We've tried. He won't give us an answer. Is after you knew that there was a suspicion that Hillary Clinton was setting this all in motion, and then you're told the FBI has opened up a fusion cell and they're looking at it. Why didn't you say something? Are you sure that we're not. He doesn't seem to object to it. That's the one thing that's a judgment thing. I don't know if it's criminal, but it's a judgment.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You're never going to get it. Because he'll claim executive privilege if Congress calls him. He'll call him executive privilege if the FBI goes in to try to investigate him.

[John Solomon]

That's right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And then the Supreme Court has ruled, as in the Trump case, that under the executive branch got all kinds of powers. All right, John. Very Good. And I think we did about as good a job as we could to lay it out to everybody in a very confusing situation where we are right now. And I, I hope you'll keep in touch with us when you get new stuff.

[John Solomon]

I will.

[Bill O'Reilly]

This is an unbelievably important story for the Congress.

[John Solomon]

Tomorrow is going to be the most important day of all the revelations we've had this year. Bill. We should keep an eye on it. I believe it'll be Senator Chuck Grassi will release this classified annex of the Durham report. And in that report we're going to learn something very important. We're going to learn that the FBI also knew, like Barack Obama, that Hillary had set this fake story in motion and they decided to proceed with evidence that they knew was coming from Hillary Clinton. That's going to be the first time. It's a very important moment.

[Bill O'Reilly]

That's a crime.

[John Solomon]

And it's important because one other thing, I want to take us just one week ahead just because I leave it, I'll leave them at a cliffhanger. But in January, for the first time, Barack Obama does something that a lot of people are deeply concerned about. In fact, an FBI agent wrote personal notes saying how concerned he was about it after they released the Intelligence Committee assessment that's flip flopped. The FBI has decided that Mike Flynn, the incoming National Security Advisor, did nothing wrong. They want to shut the investigation of Mike Flynn down. On the same day that Barack Obama is releasing this new Intelligence Committee assessment that does the 180 degree flip.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Right.

[John Solomon]

He presides over a meeting at the White House and at that meeting they're told the FBI has cleared Mike Flynn. And they sit with Joe Biden and other top aids saying how can we keep an investigation of Mike Flynn going even though he's not done anything wrong? And they scheme up an idea. They talk about the Logan act that wasn't going to be applied, but they talked about it and they come up with the idea. Let's get him to an interview.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Separate case though. That'll be a case in this show.

[John Solomon]

Viewed as a continuation of a conspiracy. That's what some people feel.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, John Solomon, thanks again. We really appreciate it. Bill@billo riley.com bill@billow reilly.com if you have any questions. Okay. All right. Bias in the media. One of the reasons the Democratic Party dissent in the Wall Street Journal poll is so shocking is that the corporate media still back some but the corporate media's fallen off the cliff just like the party. So this is Latest okay, so NewsBusters is a conservative outfit and they are pretty good with their studies. I've never seen them take stats and manipulate them as other people do. I haven't seen that from news buses. So here are the stats. All right, so Colbert is the poster boy now for, you know, guys getting hammered because they're far Left. Right. In 20, since 2022, we're talking about two and a half years. Colbert has hosted 176 left leaning guests. Only one Republican. Guess who the Republican was? Liz Cheney, who hates Trump. Okay. That's the only reason she signed it this year alone. First half of the year, Colbert had 43 left lending political guests zero conservatives. Way to go, Stevie baby. Now all of them late night. 99% of political guests on late night comedy shows lean left 99% in the first half of this year. Okay, January 6th, June 30th, 160, 106 liberal Democrats, one conservative who was a conservative guy named Oren Cass, founder of a right wing think tank. He appeared on the Daily Show, Kimmel, Myers, Fallon, Colbert and the Daily Show, Jon Stewart. He only does it once a week. Okay, they won't book you now. It'll be interesting to see for confronting evil. If Stuart books me. I don't know whether he will or not. He gets astronomical ratings when he does. Okay, we have a long history of very interesting segments. Let's see if he does or not. Now we're going to ask them all to book me. Kimmel, Fallon, Holcroft and I'll report back to you when I go on. The ratings go up on the bestselling nonfiction author in the world. Books are phenomenal. 19 number one bestsellers. Why wouldn't you book me? I'm pretty handsome, right? And they have a battery of makeup people and they all have 10 writers. So it's 10 against one. You should be able to beat me with 10 guys who are called Stewart. I said yeah, you should be able to beat me. It's me against your 12 guys back there writing anti O'Reilly jokes. We'll see. It'll be very interesting study. So the danger all this at late night and the morning follows too. Mornings like that not quite as bad. GMA Today show, all that is it. It creates an aura. Propaganda. That's what the doctor was to teach. Calling me a propagandist because she doesn't think DEI favors groups, which of course it does, but what are you going to do? I thought she was a good guest. So it creates this bubble of propaganda where Uninformed people who live in the left wing world, they believe this stuff. So if you never see a moderate voice, always see left wing people late night, in the morning on a network show, what do you think you're going to do if you don't know very much. And that's what's happening. And it happened yesterday, Sunday. So my pal Stephen A. Smith was on this Week with Jonathan Karl and he texted me, says watch and critique me, which I did. And Smith is always good, very lively and makes his points. But Carl is a nitwit. I'm sorry, John. I'm sorry. You are. And I'm going to prove it now. So there were two sound bites that I'm going to show you. The first one is that they're talking about Tulsi Gabbard, who overstated her case, by the way. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard way overstated her case. She out kicked her coverage. There is a thread of truth in what she has, but that she exaggerated. Okay, here's what Carl said. Go.

[John Solomon]

So let's start with the the what we saw in the White House this week. Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence coming out making some extraordinary claims about Barack Obama, the President of the United States, accusing Obama of treason. Again, no evidence whatsoever for any of this stuff.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah, there's plenty of evidence. Barack Obama as president presided over meetings that talked about Russian collusion with the head of the CIA, the head of the FBI. We're both in serious trouble, okay. For passing on false information. Obama was at those meetings. Now that doesn't mean he did anything wrong. But surely you need to investigate what happened at those meetings. Right? You can't go on the air on abc. Well, you can but. And say there's no evidence. That's evidence. The President Barack Obama held meetings discussing Russian collusion with guys who allegedly falsified information. That's evidence. All right, the second one is about Kamala Harris using HER2, her $2 billion campaign fund to pay celebrities to say good things about her. Go.

[John Solomon]

Trump actually suggested last night that Kamala Harris should be prosecuted for allegedly buying the votes endorsements of celebrities like Beyonce.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Again, no evidence to this stuff. Blow. There's plenty of evidence. If you're giving money to anybody to help you in your campaign, that's an in kind donation. Okay, so Oprah, as widely reported, got more than a million dollars to put on an event for Harris that came out of her money, campaign money. Bruce Springsteen got 75,000. Beyonce got 165,000. Beyonce didn't do jack. I don't think she even sang a song. That's evidence, John. Carl, what is wrong with you? Now, Trump exaggerated it, as he sometimes does. Here's what he said. Quote, I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats after the presidential election. And in fact, they admit to paying, probably illegally, $11 million singer Beyonce for an endorsement. No, nobody admitted paying $11 million to Beyonce because it didn't happen. And B, we can't find it. And we would have found it. Now, there was some obscure nut on the Internet, not even an organization that said something, but you can't do that. And that just gives the Jonathan Karls, who are not reporting honestly, openings. Just keep it in the fact zone. But there's absolutely evidence that the Harris campaign spent money to get these celebrities surrounding her. Whether it's illegal or not is for the FEC to take a look at. That's how you fairly report this. Boy, smart life. Can you change a tire? Okay, I love this. This is from Finance Buzz Talk to a thousand American adults. Only 48% can change a tire. Now, I can change a tire, but it'd take me like eight hours to do it. I know the jack and I. I know the essentials. I have changed tires in the past. Way back now, I got every service in the world, but it takes a couple of hours for them to show up to change your tire. So 52% of Americans say they need somebody else to change the tire. All right? And the boomers are the worst. And then Gen X, then millennials, and then Gen Z. The Gen Zs can, can change the tires. The boomers can. 64% say they would need help to change their oil. I. I would need a battery help. I can't do that. 80% say they can refill the air in a tire. I can do that. But 73% say they can't change their spark plugs. I can't do that. So I got a guy who does it for me. But I thought it was pretty amusing that most Americans, this point in history cannot change a flat tire. Okay, here's another thing. This from Canadian casino website Gamble Lizard. Take it for what it's worth. 43% of Americans say they would leave their romantic partner for $1 million. 43% Throwing a partner under the cliche ridden bus for a million bucks. Okay. Also for a million dollars, 41% say they would swear off sex forever. That is what they say. For a million bucks. 59% say they would give up their cell phones and live off the grid. And 15% say they would frame a friend for a crime the friend did not commit for a million bucks. Now that drives right into my stat that 15% of the world's population of human beings are evil. A lot of folks, that's why I wrote confronting evil out in September. So that could perfect. So gamble lizard has right into my wheelhouse. Some other stats. 57% of Americans would quit their jobs immediately if they got a million bucks. All right, final thought of the day. One of my predictions is wrong. Kamala Harris just moments ago in the afternoon when we're taping this on Wednesday said she's not running for governor. I thought you would. She said no. Not gonna do it. Okay. Movies. I can't remember last time I went to a movie theater trying to think. I get so mad at the last James Bond movie. It was such an awful experience sitting there watching James Bond dissolve before my very eyes that I didn't go back to the movies for a long time. And this summer, really, I'm in much the top grossing movie is Lilo and Stitch made $420 million. Wow. Lila. Jurassic park rebirth. I guess at the 19th dinosaurs or running around movie that's gross 300 million. Didn't see it. Superman, the new Superman. 300 million. Now the old Superman. The first one was the best. Christopher Reeves, Gene Hackman, Lex Luthor, great. He was fabulous in it. And Marlon Brando, Superman's father after that. That was it. I said I was good. I'm not a big Superman, Batman, Green Lantern kind of guy. But that was a good movie. I. I'm not gonna go see this new Superman or I the dinosaurs pop up on my cable. I might watch a little of it. But I know that the dinosaurs are gonna chase people around. Gotta pay 12 bucks to see that again. Here comes the dinosaur. Let's get out of here. And then you know he's gonna get eaten in the first 10 minutes. You go, that guy's gonna get eaten. Anybody who's nasty, they're gonna get eaten. So I don't go to the movies in the theaters and I don't watch a lot of movies anyway because I'm so busy and I'm reading books and all of that. But that is my final thought. I hope you enjoy the movies. If you've seen a good one, bill it bill o'reilly.com give me a heads up on it. All right. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the no spin news. We'll see you again soon.