
Loading summary
Ryan Reynolds
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. With the price of just about everything going up, we thought we'd bring our prices down.
Bill O'Reilly
So to help us, we brought in a reverse auctioneer, which is apparently a thing Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium wireless. Better get 30, 30, better get 30, better get 20, 20, 20 better get 20, 20. Everybody get 15, 15, 15, 15. Just 15 bucks a month. So give it a try.
Ryan Reynolds
@Mintmobile.Com Switch upfront payment of $45 for.
Dr. John Goodman
Three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required new customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of network's busy taxes and fees extra. See Mintmo. Lisa Schneider will train in her office job to become the leader of a pack of dogs as the owner of her own dog rescue. That is a second act made possible by the reskilling courses Lisa's taking now with AARP to help make sure her income lives as long as she does. And she can finally run with the big dogs and the small dogs who just think they're big dogs. That's why the younger you are, the more you need AARP. Learn more at aarp.org skills.
Bill O'Reilly
Well, the nation awaits the House vote on the big bill. I was on Hannity's radio program today. He said it would come tomorrow or next week. I don't know. He talks to the Republicans a lot more than I do because I never talk to them. Nobody ever calls me. That's not true. But very few people do. I can't predict. I can't predict whether the bill will pass in the House. There's lots of backroom dealings going on. As you may know, a senator from Alaska, Lisa Murkowski, was bought and she voted for the bill which put it over the top in the Senate. By being bought, I mean that Alaska's getting a lot of subsidies from the federal government in return for Ms. Murkowski's support. And that's the way it goes. So the dissenting Republican congresspeople, they're dealing with them now, trying to convince them that this, that and the other thing. Hannity believes a bill will pass. I just don't know whether it will or not. Any Republican in the House voting against the big bill is crucifying his or her own party. Republicans don't pass this bill, the Democrats rise from the dead, literally rise from the dead. And we've been over this and over this and over this. Anyway, I hope that the bill passes not for partisan reasons. It gives working people a break across the board, break financially. That's why I would vote for it. I hate the pork and it's in there. But you got to give the folks at this point in history a break in America if it does pass. President Trump emerges triumphant in his first six months. That is the subject of this evening's Talking Points Memo. So let's run it down. The successes of Donald Trump now, his dissenters, people that hate him will never acknowledge, but normal people who believe in honesty, in fact, finding will. First thing, is the border sealed? All right. Biden couldn't do it, wouldn't do it, didn't want to do it. And that led to bedlam in the United States. Trump sealed the border in first two months. So far, about 210,000 people have been deported, undocumented people, and there are currently 60,000 being detained. That's according to Homeland Security and the NBC News Deportation Tracker. Wow. So that's been a big success, with the exception of the deportations, which I told you before Trump was elected was, you know, going to be very difficult to do. And a lot of these people are questionable whether they should be booted out without due process. But let's give that a big win because the intrusion of foreign nationals into the USA undocumented has largely stopped. Very good for the country. Second one, Trump bombed Iran successfully into marginalization. The country is not nearly the threat that it was a month ago. It's a big victory. Stock market, about the same. But that's kind of a victory for the Trump administration because it was at a very high level under Biden. And was that a Biden achievement, keeping the stock level high? Not really, because Covid caused the massive spending that bolstered consumerism in America. And remember, the economy goes the way you go. You spend. The economy is good. You don't. The economy goes down. It's a very simple concept. You don't have to go get an advanced degree in economics. So the stock market's holding its own. If this big bill passes, you'll see a surge that will happen. The bill itself, you know, look, do you call it a success? You do, because it buys Trump time to do, well, the other things he wants to do. Another success. Trump embarrassed the progressive state of California by sending the National Guard to quell the ice. Riots humiliated that state and it deserved to be humiliated. They Governor, California, Newsom and the mayor of la. We're not going to stop the violence. I'm not going to go accuse them of fostering it, but they don't want to stop it. Trump recognized it right away. No other guard Went anywhere else. Okay, Trump's pounding the media into pudding, so I'll tell you about it in a moment. But last night, CBS settled with Trump for 16 million. That'll go to his library and legal affairs. ABC, December 24, reached a settlement with Trump for another 16 million. Metta, Facebook, Instagram, settled for 25 million. Trust. Beating these guys, he's beating them down. He's got the power. So for six months, Pretty good resume, right? Here's a danger. Arrogance. I've seen it, and it happened all throughout history. Once the administration gets a little momentum, some people within the administration get very arrogant. And I'm seeing it now. I'm not going to give you names, but I might. I might. If they're hurting you, if they begin to hurt you with their arrogance. I haven't seen a change in Trump. He's pretty much the same guy, but some of his underlings will take it with themselves. Not good. Your public servants. That is your job, to strut around saying, I'm great. Okay? And that's a memo. So the settlement from CBS is interesting. So Paramount owns cbs. They want to sell the whole thing to a company called Skydance. Trump is never going to approve that unless CBS capitulated, which they did last night. Okay, I told you 16 million. Now, this is all about 60 minutes. 60 minutes wanted Kamala Harris to win the election. There's no doubt about it. You just go back and look at the transcripts, as I have, and it's all about promoting Kamala and diminishing Trump on 60 Minutes carried over to Nightly News somewhat CBS Morning. Yeah, but the whole news organization was behind Kamala. That is a fair assessment backed up by transcripts. Now, the big one was the interview that Bill Whitaker, CBS correspondent, 60 Minutes, did with Kamala Harris. So Trump was angry that the promotion for the piece, that's the commercial, was different than what Kamala Harris said within the body of the story. I don't think that CBS would have lost that case in court. There is a difference. But is it egregious? So Trump sued them for billions of dollars, saying, you interfere with the election. The bigger picture is what's important. And this is what I'm going to zero in. And now. So I'm hard on the media because I know. I don't think. It's not an opinion. I know that the corporate media has gone far left. It has. That's. That's the truth. Okay. So when I watched the Kamala Harris, Bill Whitaker interview, I didn't much like it. This sound bite happened October 8, 2024. Go. Whitaker should have bang. Give me one solution you've offered in the first year of the Biden administration. Give me one. Because she always falls back on oh, Trump killed the immigration bill that Charles Schumer ginned up early this year. That's what she always said. Give me one that you did in the first year that is a solution to the open border. She couldn't do it. Whitaker booted it. He booted it because he didn't anticipate the boldness of the lie that what she just said from day one, literally we have been offering solutions is about the biggest falsehood I have heard from any politician in the last decade. And the truth is backed up by Trump who shut down the border and stopped the illegal immigration asylum madness in two months. And Harris going now. So Whitaker was soft on her. Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress, national debt rising, trade war shaking the markets and meanwhile China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five star reviews and an A plus from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998-899. Again, that's 866-326-5576, or text BILL to 9988.
Dr. John Goodman
If you used Babbel, you would Babbel's Conversation Based Techniques teaches you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world. With lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers, Babbel is like having a private tutor in your pocket. Start speaking with Babbel today. Get up to 55% off your Babbel subscription right now at babbel.com Spotify spelled B-A B-B-E-L.com Spotify rules and restrictions may apply.
Bill O'Reilly
Okay, I'm going to give you two examples. Here is the softest of the soft To Kamala Harris from Bill Whitaker. Go. Let's shift gears here. Most basic of questions why do you want to be President of the United States? There are many reasons, but probably first and foremost I truly believe in the promise of America. I do. And I love the American people. You know, we are a people who have ambition and aspirations and dreams and optimism and hope. Please. Number one, she loves the American people. She doesn't love me. She doesn't love the MAGA people, doesn't love Trump. She doesn't love anybody who opposes her. Now, Whitaker just sat there and let her go on and on about her love for the people and hope and aspiration. This is not an interview. It's not the way it's done. You've been watching me for almost 30 years. You know how an interview on television should be done. This is gibberish. Okay? Now, let's be fair to Whitaker. He's been around a long time. I don't know him. Here's a hard question. He asked go. You were for Medicare for all. Now, you're not so many that people don't truly know what you believe or what you stand for. And I know you've heard that. In the last four years, I have been Vice president, United States, and I have been traveling our country, and I have been listening to folks and seeking what is possible in terms of common ground. I believe in building consensus. More gibberish, okay? And when the interview subject descends into that kind of banality, the interviewer, me or Whitaker, has got to jump in and go, wait a minute. I asked you why you change your opinion on Medicare. Can you answer that? Madam, you don't let them just go all over the place. Oh, the interview was a softball. Now, here's the worst thing. Even if that went to court, I don't think Trump would have won the Kamala Harris thing, all right? Because they would have said, ah, it's different interpretations. You can't prove there's malice. But here's how you can prove it. One name Scott Pelley got. Pelley is, I think, the Senior Correspondent on 60 Minutes Now. All right? He hates Donald Trump. Remember his college graduate? He despises the man. And story after story, after all you got to do is parade Pelly in there. I mean, it was so outrageous. The last one he did, Mark Elias, was a top attorney for Hillary Clinton who ginned up the Russian collusion fraud, and Pelly sainted him, canonized him on 60 Minutes, and used him as a cudgel to hit Trump without even telling the audience who Elias was. Don't tell me that CBS is a responsible news agency. It is not. I worked there when it was responsible. So anyway, they got to pay Trump 16 million, probably more. All right. Join us now, Dr. John Goodman from Dallas, Texas. He is a senior fellow with the Independent Institute, a non profit, nonpartisan public policy research group. So first of all, Doctor, am I making any mistakes in my analysis?
Ryan Reynolds
No, I don't think you are. I think what this bill reflects is that Donald Trump is probably the best marketer in politics today. And it's very obvious that he wants to connect with blue collar families. And when you hear him talk about it, he says no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security. That's the way he describes it. In fact, none of those taxes are really going away. What's happening here is there is a small tax break for people with moderate incomes and it goes away in four years. But it's a terrific way for Donald Trump and the Republican Party to connect with people who used to vote for Democrats.
Bill O'Reilly
Okay, but $25,000 on tips deductible, that's significant for the service industry people. It's absolutely significant. And it goes away in four years. Let's hope that it doesn't go away because those people need all the assistance they can get. But overall, the American public, and I'm going to do this right after we wrap this interview with you, has a negative view of this bill because they haven't been told the truth about it. And you know, I got millions of viewers. Dr. All over the world. But it's, you know, there are 365 million people in America right now counting illegal aliens. And they hear this stuff. They're not paying attention, many of them. And, oh, they're going to cut Medicaid and Medicare. They're going to cut this, they're going to cut that. This is a concerted, propagandistic effort to undermine what Trump wants to do. Am I wrong?
Ryan Reynolds
No, you're right. The public is being lied to about how the income tax system actually works. And Republicans have done a very, very poor job of defending themselves. Now, the way our system works is the rich are not getting away with not paying their fair share. In fact, the rich pay almost all the income taxes. The bottom half of the income distribution pays 2 or 3% of all income taxes. They pay almost nothing. The top 1% are paying 40% of income taxes top. 10% pay 75% top. So we have the most progressive tax system in the whole world, far more progressive than any European country. And why is it that way? Because of Republican tax legislation. Every time the Republicans have legislated, they've thrown more and more people off the tax rolls and Republicans never brag about it. They never go out and say, look, the reason half the people aren't paying the income taxes is because of us. You never hear them say that. So they have shifted the burden to the rich, and they don't want to tell you that. And the Democrats lie about it, okay?
Bill O'Reilly
But the Republican, their basic philosophy is lower taxes and the wealthy because we're in a transitional age into high tech. All right? There are plenty more billionaires than they used to be, just as there were at the 20th century. You know, that turn of the 20th century with Rockefeller and Morgan and all those people, with these big colossus corporations taking over the infrastructure of the United States. I write about it in Confronting Evil, which is beyond September. I mean, some of these people, they call them the robber barons, were as evil as they come because there was a transition and they got fabulously wealthy. The same transition is taking place, or has been for the last 20 years, into technology and the founders of Apple and all these people, gazillions of dollars, because that's happening. But the Republican Party doesn't want to punish them. It doesn't want to confiscate what they have earned or in some cases inherited. Am I wrong on that?
Ryan Reynolds
Well, a little bit. Again, what the Republican Party has done is shift the burden of taxation to the upper part of the income distribution.
Bill O'Reilly
Which would be that Democrats didn't do.
Ryan Reynolds
That, Republicans did that. And through every single time they legislated, they threw more people off the tax rolls and shifted the burden. Well, let's take the 2017 first Trump tax cut. What did it do after it passed? We were told that was a tax cut for billionaires. Right. And within a few years, we find out that the top 1% have a greater share of the tax burden than they did before the bill was passed. So that's pretty much the way tax law has gone. And Republicans don't talk about it, all right?
Bill O'Reilly
Because most of the voters are not wealthy people. And both parties want those voters support. And it's not only that they don't pay any taxes. Doctor, as you well know, federal government sends millions of Americans money. If they don't, you know, reach a certain threshold of income, they get to get checks in a form of tax credits. And so you're right. But I think that the philosophy is Democrats tax up to here, have the government run the economy, socialism, Republicans lower the taxes as much as possible, even for the big corporations, and let capitalism run. That's what I think the two philosophies are last Word.
Ryan Reynolds
That's certainly the way they talk about it. But in reality, we have a very progressive tax system. Republicans have created it and they don't explain it very well.
Bill O'Reilly
All right, Doc, we appreciate it very much. Thank you again. We'll see if this bill passes in the House. Can be a brawl. Pretty interesting situation. We should know by this time next week if we do have a new spend and tax bill. Now, As I mentioned, CNN's propaganda is now at a record level and they don't like the bill at all. There isn't one corporate entity outside of FOX that supports this bill. Just tells you, you know, where they are as far as their politics is concerned. Here's what was said on CNN last night about the big bill. Go.
Ryan Reynolds
I'll give you some adjectives. How about awful, horrible, and to quote Our dear friend, Mr. Sir Charles Barclay, terrible, terrible, terrible. What are we talking about here? Well, why don't we take a look at the big, beautiful bill. I got four, five, five, not just four, five different polls across the screen for you. This is the net favorable rating. The highest rating comes from the Washington Post at -19 points.
Bill O'Reilly
Okay. I mean, I'm not arguing the numbers. I know what people hear constantly every day and they do not hear the truth. Which is why I'm so happy that you are watching and listening to me right now because we will always tell you the truth. Always. All right, American Pride. New poll. Gallup, just in time for the Fourth of July. How proud are you to be an American? Extremely, very proud. 58. Moderately. Only a little proud. 30. Not at all proud. 9. Now that extremely, very proud number is down 23 points in 10 years. So in 2015, 81% of Americans were extremely or very proud, and that is because of President Trump, the polarizing effect that he has had. Second question to Republicans. How proud of you to be an American? 92% of Republicans say they're proud to be an American. Democrats 36%. Independence. 53. This is extremely, very proud.
William Goudge
I'm William Goudge, a viewer, collaborator and professional ultra runner from the uk. I love to tackle endurance runs around the world, including a 55 day, 3,064 mile run across the US so I know a thing or two about performance wear. When it comes to relaxing, I look for something ultra versatile and comfy. The Ponto Performance Jogger from Vuri is perfect for all of those things. It's the comfiest jogger I've ever worn. And the Dream Knit fabric is why I'll always reach for them over other joggers. Check them out in the Dreamlit collection by going to vuory.com william that's v U-O-R-I.com william where new customers can receive 20% off their first order, plus enjoy free shipping in the US on orders over $75 and free returns. Exclusions apply. Visit the website for full terms and conditions.
Ryan Reynolds
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game? Well, with the name your price tool from Progressive, you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills. Try it@progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates Price and coverage match limited by state law. Not available in all states.
Bill O'Reilly
So there you go. Democrats, they do not like the country right now because of maga. The MAGA people overwhelmed them. Kamala is not president. Thank God. That would have been an unmitigated disaster because coming off Biden, the second worst president ever and again confronting the president's documents, it. There you go. Now, on Friday, Supreme Court ruled against judge shopping. What is this? So when Donald Trump got into office, and this is the message of the day on BillORiley.com, which is different from the column, okay, Donald Trump got into office, he wrote a bunch of executive orders trying to overturn the, the Biden executive orders of four years ago. When Biden opened the border and did all that, Republicans did not challenge a lot of that in federal court. They groused about it and complained about it, but they didn't go around and try to undermine executive orders en masse. That's not what they did. Democrats did. So the Democrats would go to Washington State or Massachusetts or California, one of those, find a judge they knew would rule in a liberal way against Trump, and then they slap on a national injunction so some pinhead judge in Sacramento could stop an entire executive order for the entire country. Now, I knew this was insane, and so did you. I'm sure you did. Here's what I said on June 4. Go. So the founding father said, we're going to give the president the power to issue executive orders to protect the people and the people's treasury, not to abuse the people. That's what executive orders are supposed to be. Now, they are subject to review from the judiciary, but now that's being abused to the highest level in our history. And Supreme Court has to rule on it. And they, I assume they will this month because after the end of June, they take three months off. I assume that they're going to rule and knock this crazy stuff out to some extent. Hello, Nostradamus. That's me. But it wasn't a hard prediction. Okay? But everything I said came true on Friday, 6, 3 ruling, okay? The justices had limited the use of nationwide injunctions. Okay? They said that if you're a judge and somebody comes and files a petition, you can hear that case, the single case, if the person's in your jurisdiction, but you can't issue a national pause or anything else. So the left went crazy. And the three liberal judges, and look, I'm not going to disparage the liberal judges because there are conservative judges and they vote ideology sometimes, too, with the liberal judges had no constitutional basis. So here's what Amy Comey Barrett Supreme Court justice who ruled the majority opinion wrote the majority opinion I should see. Here's what she said. Quote, we will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this. Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary. All right, so Ketanji Brown Jackson, appointed by Biden, is probably more liberal than Sotomayor, definitely more than Kagan. And she would, you know, okay, you can't stop this and all that. And the six other judges said, this is crazy. That's not what the founders had in mind. And certainly it isn't. All right? But Judge Jackson doesn't care because she views her job as advancing a cause, a liberal cause. But again, some conservatives feel that way, too, in my opinion, my humble opinion. All right, this is an ongoing battle over the Constitution being used for political purposes. But there's no doubt it was in this case now on cable tv, which is sunk into the morass. I don't think it'll ever come out of it. It was predictable. Go. I was trying to sort out my feelings on this matter, and I came up with a quote from a very smart lawyer.
Ryan Reynolds
And I just want to quote it.
Bill O'Reilly
Because I think she was right when she said it. It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks. Justice Elena Kagan in 2022 said that, of course, when we had a Democratic president. Now she voted against the decision on Friday. Just goes to show you that some of these folks really are a hack. What the Supreme Court has done, and again, stacked largely by these Trump appointees, is ceding their power under the Constitution, in fact, their responsibility as a judicial branch. They're ceding that to Donald Trump, who is a lawless president. Oh, what a bunch of bull that is now, the original executive order that sparked all this was President Trump's intention to say no more birth. Right. Okay. So if you are born here, you are not automatically a citizen. That's what President Trump wanted to do. Now, the Supreme Court did not rule on that, and I don't think they're going to rule in Trump's favor. Okay. It's clear in the Constitution that those words are there. If a person is born in the United States, that person is a citizen. Doesn't matter how they got here. Not a lot of. There's no footnotes. So Senator Van Hollen, who's, you know, about as far left as you get, he's going to be proved wrong, because I don't think the Supreme Court's going to knock that out of the Constitution. It may be possible they might attach a few things to for review of it. But anyway, that has been paused for 30 days. And since the court doesn't come back to late September, it'll, I think the pause will be extended. And that's a memo. Another ruling. On Friday, Montgomery County, Maryland, parents sued in federal court saying, look, if the schools in Montgomery county are going to teach about gay stuff and they're going to promote LBGTQ stuff, then we want to kids to be out of the classroom because we don't believe that on religious grounds. Okay. And again, the justices ruled six, three, same thing, that, yeah, if you're a religious person who does not believe that the gay lifestyle is accepted by your religion, your kid doesn't have to listen to that. Common sense. Right? I believe so. They're not banning the lesson. They're giving the parents a right to take the kid out when that happens. Okay. So the left, of course, went nuts. Go.
Ryan Reynolds
Right. Now, this looks like it affects only books with LGBTQ characters, but it very well might extend to science and evolution and, and all the other things that for some reason are up for debate in this day and age that, that are rooted in science and understanding. But it very well might upend what we think of as public education.
Bill O'Reilly
Yeah, I'm not worried. Okay. I don't think you're going to be imposing evolution on the kids in the classroom. Both should be discussed, though. You know, why not, why not discuss the biblical point of view? Say, look, there are some fundamentalist religious people who believe Adam and Eve were there and they. Which, you know, the snake was chasing them around. There's nothing wrong with that. Okay. You don't say it's fact. I mean, but you know, how it is what this is all about. This ruling is all about is there are many states, Maryland, at the top of the list, that want to impose liberal doctrine on the students. That's what they want. Okay, I guess there are some states that want to impose conservative doctrine. Maybe Louisiana, because they had the 10 commandment thing. But the liberal states are real active in this. All right, this isn't funny. South of the border, Mexico remains out of control, getting worse over the weekend. Okay? 20 bodies are found in Sinaloa. 4 headless corpses hanging from a bridge. Of course. I mean, this is just a regular weekend. Okay? 27 murders on one day. June 29th, Sunday. Okay? Everybody's supposed to be in church. Mexico's Catholic country. 29 murders, one day in Sinaloa. That's one province. Okay, President, Mexico can't control it. Here was a statement from the Mexican government, though. Military and police forces are working together to reestablish total peace in Sinaloa. Yeah, okay. How long has that been going on now? What, 20 years? You can't or won't stop the killing. The drug cartels control the country. What is daddication? The thing that drives me every day as a dad is Dariana. We call him Dae Date for short. Every day he's hungry for something, whether it's attention, affection, knowledge. And there's this huge responsibility in making sure that when he's no longer under my wing that he's a good person. I want him to be able to sit back one day and go, we worked together. We did a good job. That's dedication. Find out more@fatherhood.gov brought to you by the U.S. department of Health and Human Services and the Ad Council. Americans love using their credit cards. The most secure and hassle free way to pay. But D.C. politicians want to change that with the Durbin Marshall credit card bill. This bill lets corporate megastores pick how your credit card is processed, allowing them to use untested payment networks that jeopardize your data, security and rewards. Corporate megastores will make more money and you pay the price. Tell Congress to guard your card because Americans lose when politicians choose. Learn more@guardyourcard.com now, if President Sheinbaum would cooperate with President Trump and join forces, the two countries could wipe out the cartels. But Sheinbaum will not do it. Nor would her predecessor, Obra Dorr, who I believe, and I could be wrong, had a little arrangement with the cartels. Let's put it that way. Okay, Chimeaum, have that. I don't know, not trying to save any lives so far in this year. First six months. Okay, 11,121 murders in Mexico. It's the most dangerous country in the world. 11,121. That doesn't count the thousands of people who just vanished. Okay, the crocodiles ate them or something. I don't. But they're dead. Hey, Claudia, wise up. Smart life. So this is an interesting story. When Covid hit and people were off the streets, you weren't banned from going out. Okay, you just had to wear a mask or whatever. But very few people comparatively did go out. Most people cliche alert, sheltered in place. Those who went out on the highways drove like 150 miles an hour because there was anybody on highways that has now carried over to post Covid. If you go on a Long island expressway where I live, you got dangerous people going 100 miles an hour more, weaving in and out of traffic. So much so that there is a public outcry here in New York about it. So Allstate has ranked the safest cities for driving and the unsafest cities. Let's go with the safe cities. First. The safest place to drive an automobile, a vehicle in the USA is Brownsville, Texas. Isn't that a shocker on the border? Boise, Idaho. Fort Collins, Colorado. Cary, North Carolina. Laredo, Texas. Another border town, Olathe, Kansas. Scottsdale, Arizona. Port St. Lucie, Florida. Madison, Wisconsin. Eugene, Oregon. Interesting group. Here are the most dangerous. Boston by far. Because Boston, you cannot drive in the town. They don't have street signs. The town hasn't changed its grid since Samuel Adams and John Hancock. And narrow streets everywhere. Nobody knows where they're going. Don't drive there. D.C. second, I don't really know why. Baltimore, third. Worcester, Mass. Why Worcester, Mass. Would be fourth? I don't know. Springfield, Mass. I guess they're not. They're just not enforcing the traffic laws in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Glender, California. Suburb of la LA itself. Oakland, Providence, Rhode Island. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. New York City's not on the list because people aren't crazy enough to drive in New York city anymore. Number one, it costs you like 50 bucks to do that. And number two, it's insane. You're just going to sit there. That's why it's not on the list. Now here's a Smart Life tip. Most of us have to drive. We're going to encounter people who are insane on the road. You can't react. And to me that's the hardest thing. I really want to whack them I really do. Road rage. I don't, I don't know what you call it. Can't. Can't. So somebody tailgating you, you pull over, let the idiot go by. Somebody weaving in and out. I try to get the plate number, okay? And if I see a cop or something, I give them the cop. But that never. What they should have is drones photographing these cars. And they will, they have to. And get these people charged them with felonies, reckless endangerment. That's what I charge them with here in New York. They are impounding the cars now. Good. Smart life. Okay. Donald Trump, in addition to putting migrants in the Everglades, bombing the Iranians and basically telling California to go blank yourself, has a new fragrance out. It's true. 249 bucks gets you 3.3 ounces of victory. 45, 47. Fragrance. Here is how it is described. It's for men with rich, masculine notes and women, a perfume was sophisticated, subtly feminine scent. Okay, so Trump selling the cologne and perfume. Now, this is a venture by cic, which is a corporation owned by Donald Trump. I think he had to put this someplace when he was reelected president. His kids control the Trump Organization that are probably controlling this. But anyway, I don't usually do these kinds of touts, but you can get the fragrance on the Internet. It's 250 bucks for three ounces. So I don't think cocaine is that expensive. But I don't know. I'm not in that world. If you do buy this, please let me know. Bill@billorilly.com Bill O', Don, Bill O'Reilly.com Write me an email, tell me why you bought it and how it's going. Is the dog howling? You know, are you happy with your rich, masculine fragrance? I, you know, I think Chester A. Arthur put out a cologne, but I'm not sure. He was a bit of a dandy. President Arthur was, but I have to check that Trump cologne. So we Americans celebrate the Fourth of July, and we usually have a barbecue, you know, the usual drill. Some of us travel and visit people, but we don't give gifts. Okay, but I think that might be a mistake. So if you know someone who's really patriotic, particularly a veteran or a senior citizen who served, you know, and they really love their country. Right. I'd like you to consider giving them a premium membership to Billorilly.com as a gift. And if you know somebody who's in trouble, as we just demonstrated on our commercial, who's having a hard time negotiating life. No, I can't. I don't have a magic wand here. I can't make an irresponsible person responsible. I can't do that. Okay. But if you're getting hosed, somebody's hurting you, I can give you a pathway to solve the problem. And we can also get involved if it's at a level where I believe we have to. And we do that. Okay. Might have a staff that does that, a good one. So if you know somebody who's very patriotic or somebody who's having a little bit of trouble in life, you might consider gifting them a premium or concierge membership to Billorily.com this Fourth of July and explain it to them just as I explained it to you. Okay? America's the most generous people on Earth. There's nobody that comes close to us in our charitable giving, in our helping of our neighbors, in our concern for other people. No one on this planet comes close. And that's documented. Okay. About charitable giving and interest in other people. That is the Judeo Christian tradition that we in America have built our country on. That is the foundation of the Constitution. So we're in the business here@billoriley.com to inform you honestly, to help your life with information, and to help you directly if we can. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the no Spin News. See you Monday.
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis: Highlights from July 4, 2025
In the July 4, 2025 episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly delves into a range of pressing national and international issues, providing his signature straightforward commentary. This detailed summary captures the episode's key discussions, insights, and conclusions, complete with notable quotes and timestamps for reference.
Bill O’Reilly opens the episode by addressing the looming House vote on a significant legislative bill. He expresses uncertainty about the bill’s passage timeline, stating, “[00:12] I can't predict whether the bill will pass in the House.” O’Reilly highlights internal party dynamics, mentioning that “a senator from Alaska, Lisa Murkowski, was bought” to secure the Senate’s approval, implying that federal subsidies influenced her support. He underscores the bill's importance for providing financial relief to working Americans, emphasizing his support despite acknowledging the presence of pork-barrel politics.
O’Reilly transitions to evaluating President Donald Trump's initial half-year tenure. He outlines several key accomplishments:
Border Security: Trump successfully sealed the U.S. border, leading to the deportation of approximately 210,000 undocumented individuals and detaining 60,000 more. O’Reilly remarks, “[07:30] The intrusion of foreign nationals into the USA undocumented has largely stopped. Very good for the country.”
Iran Relations: The administration's actions against Iran are portrayed as a strategic success, marginalizing the nation as a diminished threat.
Stock Market Stability: Despite minimal changes, the stock market’s consistency is seen as a victory, attributed to Trump’s economic policies rather than Biden’s previous administration.
Media Settlements: O’Reilly highlights significant legal victories against major media outlets, detailing settlements with CBS, ABC, and Meta (formerly Facebook), totaling $57 million. He asserts, “[10:50] Trust. Beating these guys, he's beating them down. He's got the power.”
However, O’Reilly warns of potential internal challenges, particularly arrogance within the administration, which he fears could undermine progress if unchecked.
A substantial portion of the episode critiques the mainstream media's bias, especially against Trump. O’Reilly discusses his contentious relationship with networks like CBS and 60 Minutes, asserting that they promote Democratic agendas. He references the settlement with CBS over their portrayal of Kamala Harris, arguing that their coverage was unfairly biased to favor Democratic narratives. O’Reilly states, “[15:05] The corporate media has gone far left. It has. That's the truth.”
In an insightful segment with Dr. John Goodman from the Independent Institute, O’Reilly examines the Republican Party’s tax strategies. They discuss how recent Republican tax legislation has shifted the tax burden toward the wealthy. Dr. Goodman explains, “[17:11] Our system is very progressive because Republicans have shifted the burden to the top.” O’Reilly agrees, highlighting that while Republicans advocate for lower taxes for all, the reality disproportionately benefits higher-income groups. This discussion underscores ongoing debates about tax fairness and economic policy in America.
O’Reilly addresses recent Supreme Court decisions that limit the use of nationwide injunctions. He criticizes what he perceives as judicial overreach, particularly focusing on decisions that affect executive orders and educational curricula. Regarding citizenship by birth, he asserts that the Constitution clearly states, “If a person is born in the United States, that person is a citizen,” challenging attempts to reinterpret this clause. Additionally, he discusses rulings allowing parents to remove their children from classrooms discussing LGBTQ topics on religious grounds, viewing these as victories for parental rights and religious freedom.
The host turns to international concerns, particularly the escalating violence in Mexico. Highlighting Sinaloa’s alarming murder rates, O’Reilly comments, “[30:00] 11,121 murders in Mexico. It's the most dangerous country in the world.” He criticizes the Mexican government's inability to control drug cartels, suggesting a lack of effective leadership and cooperation with the U.S. to combat these criminal organizations.
In a lighter yet informative segment, O’Reilly reviews a ranking of the safest and most dangerous cities for driving in the United States. He notes that Brownsville, Texas, tops the safety list, while cities like Boston, Washington D.C., and Baltimore are labeled as the most dangerous. O’Reilly humorously criticizes Boston’s outdated street layout and traffic enforcement, attributing high accident rates to poor infrastructure and lax law enforcement.
In an unexpected promotional segment, O’Reilly discusses President Trump’s foray into the fragrance market. He humorously critiques the high price of Trump’s cologne, priced at $249 for 3.3 ounces, and invites listeners to share their experiences if they choose to purchase it. This segment blends his characteristic humor with a touch of personal engagement, showcasing his multifaceted approach to content.
Concluding the episode, O’Reilly delivers a patriotic message in anticipation of Independence Day. He encourages listeners to consider gifting a premium membership to BillOReilly.com to patriotic individuals or those facing life challenges, emphasizing America’s tradition of generosity and community support. He underscores the importance of charitable giving and helping neighbors, aligning with his broader themes of national pride and solidarity.
On Media Bias: “[15:05] The corporate media has gone far left. It has. That's the truth.”
On Tax Policy: “[17:11] Our system is very progressive because Republicans have shifted the burden to the top.”
On Supreme Court Rulings: “[30:30] It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks.”
On National Pride: “[23:06] American Pride. New poll. Gallup, just in time for the Fourth of July. How proud are you to be an American? Extremely, very proud. 58.”
Conclusion
This episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis offers a comprehensive look into the political and social landscape of mid-2025. From evaluating President Trump’s early achievements and critiquing media bias to discussing critical Supreme Court decisions and international lawlessness, O’Reilly delivers his insights with clarity and conviction. Whether addressing economic policies or celebrating national pride, the episode remains a steadfast source for listeners seeking unfiltered analysis and commentary.