Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - June 6, 2025

Summary

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis: Highlights from June 6, 2025

Overview

In the June 6, 2025, episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly delves into significant political developments, scrutinizes media biases, discusses public opinion polls, and interviews key figures involved in election integrity efforts. The episode is structured to provide a comprehensive analysis of current events, emphasizing factual reporting and critical insights.

---

1. Biden Administration’s Executive Orders Scandal

Timestamp: 01:12 - 06:54

Bill O’Reilly opens the episode by addressing a burgeoning scandal surrounding President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to sign executive orders. He highlights concerns raised by the House Oversight Committee regarding Biden’s potential lack of awareness of the contents of these orders.

• O’Reilly: “The House Oversight Committee is investigating whether President Biden actually knew what he was signing when he didn’t sign the executive orders, but an autopen did.” (02:15)

O’Reilly compares the situation to the Watergate scandal, suggesting that the use of an autopen in an unusually high percentage of executive orders (74% from January to Inauguration Day) raises questions about Biden’s mental acuity and transparency.

• O’Reilly: “This was a mammoth cover-up. And the guy who's in most trouble is the doctor that I just mentioned, o' Connor.” (05:30)

He underscores the gravity of the issue by listing high-profile individuals who received pardons via autopen, implying that this method undermines the legitimacy of the pardons.

---

2. Interview with Cleta Mitchell on Election Integrity

Timestamp: 12:05 - 27:22

O’Reilly conducts an in-depth interview with Cleta Mitchell, founder and chairman of the Election Integrity Network. Mitchell discusses her experiences following the 2020 presidential election, where she observed irregularities in Georgia's vote counting process.

• Cleta Mitchell: “We ended up, the President wanted to have a conversation with the Secretary of State because we hadn't had a judge appointed... And I will just say that's not a legal term of art. It's just exactly.” (20:43)

Mitchell explains the pressures and threats faced by lawyers supporting Trump's efforts to contest the election results, particularly from organizations like the Lincoln Project.

• Cleta Mitchell: “They [the media] being the Washington Post of the world, they're not interested in that.” (21:29)

She also details the personal and professional repercussions, including a barrage of bar complaints filed against her, which she attributes to orchestrated efforts funded by figures like David Brock.

• Cleta Mitchell: “They thought they'd vanquished me, but they made you stronger.” (26:49)

O’Reilly expresses solidarity with Mitchell, acknowledging the challenges she faced and emphasizing the importance of her work in election integrity.

---

3. Analysis of Public Opinion Polls on President Trump

Timestamp: 27:21 - 35:44

O’Reilly presents and analyzes recent polling data regarding President Donald Trump’s approval ratings, featuring insights from polling expert John McLaughlin.

• O’Reilly: “Three new polls about President Trump versus zoghb favorable to the president.” (27:21)

McLaughlin explains the discrepancies between different polls, such as Trafalgar and Atlas, attributing variations to methodologies like the distinction between likely voters and the general adult population.

• John McLaughlin: “In our likely voter polls, we used our polling as a strategy to raise his popular vote so we could sweep the battleground states.” (28:48)

The discussion highlights how economic factors, particularly tax cuts and tariffs, influence public perception and approval ratings.

• O’Reilly: “If we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” (32:37)

McLaughlin emphasizes the critical role of passing tax cuts in securing voter support, warning of potential political backlash if they fail.

---

4. Trump’s Foreign Policy and Relations with China and Russia

Timestamp: 11:17 - 38:13

O’Reilly discusses President Trump’s recent phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping, emphasizing the focus on trade agreements and downplaying other geopolitical issues.

• O’Reilly: “...it has nothing to do with me on a daily basis, but I did contribute, I think, to the overall strategy...” (11:17)

He contrasts Trump’s ability to manage relations with China more effectively than with Russia, characterizing Russian President Vladimir Putin as “psychotic” and skeptical about the prospects of resolving the conflict in Ukraine.

• O’Reilly: “Putin psychotic now. So if I were sent to Moscow, number one, I wouldn't go because they put me in prison...” (13:19)

The segment underscores the complexities of international relations and the perceived strengths and weaknesses of current U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s leadership.

---

5. Media Bias and Critique of Mainstream Outlets

Timestamp: 21:11 - 38:13

O’Reilly critiques major media organizations, particularly the Wall Street Journal, NPR, and PBS, accusing them of left-leaning biases and suppression of pro-Trump narratives.

• O’Reilly: “The Wall Street Journal in their news pages is a left wing situation.” (11:17)

He argues that these outlets unfairly target pro-Trump lawyers and organizations while ignoring similar actions against their own supporters.

• O’Reilly: “PSBs, NPR are suing Trump because Trump says, we're not going to give you $55 billion anymore.” (35:08)

O’Reilly emphasizes the need for viewpoint diversity and transparency in media reporting, positioning his own show as a counterbalance to perceived media biases.

---

6. Economic Policies: Tariffs and Tax Cuts

Timestamp: 31:05 - 35:44

The discussion shifts to economic policies, focusing on tariffs and tax cuts implemented during Trump's administration. O’Reilly asserts that while tariffs have a complex impact, the primary concern for voters remains the overall cost of living and taxes.

• O’Reilly: “Because if we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” (32:37)

McLaughlin responds by highlighting public support for tax cuts and the mixed opinions on tariffs, stressing the importance of these policies in shaping economic outcomes and voter sentiment.

• John McLaughlin: “So the jury's still out on that. It's a much more complex issue.” (31:43)

The segment concludes with a consensus on the significance of tax cuts in maintaining economic growth and voter approval.

---

7. Personal Reflections and Community Engagement

Timestamp: 35:44 - End

O’Reilly wraps up the episode with personal anecdotes, including his strategies for managing investments amidst economic turbulence and promoting his book club. He also touches on personal values, such as honoring parents despite familial shortcomings, tying it back to broader societal themes.

• O’Reilly: “If Oprah can have one, why can't I? Killing Lincoln is our bestseller.” (34:24)

He encourages respectful relationships and personal integrity, reinforcing the episode’s overarching themes of accountability and resilience.

---

Conclusion

This episode of No Spin News and Analysis offers a thorough examination of critical political issues, blending investigative commentary with firsthand interviews. Bill O’Reilly underscores the importance of transparency in government actions, critiques media biases, and provides insights into public opinion and economic policies, all while maintaining a focus on factual reporting and accountability.

Notable Quotes:

• Bill O’Reilly (02:15): “The House Oversight Committee is investigating whether President Biden actually knew what he was signing when he didn’t sign the executive orders, but an autopen did.”

• Cleta Mitchell (20:43): “We ended up, the President wanted to have a conversation with the Secretary of State because we hadn't had a judge appointed... And I will just say that's not a legal term of art. It's just exactly.”

• John McLaughlin (28:48): “In our likely voter polls, we used our polling as a strategy to raise his popular vote so we could sweep the battleground states.”

• Bill O’Reilly (32:37): “Because if we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.”

---

Stay Informed

For more in-depth analysis and updates, visit BillOReilly.com.

Transcript

[Ryan Reynolds]

Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now it pays to Discover. Learn [e-mail] credit card Based on the February 2024 Nielsen report, Ryan Reynolds here.

[Mint Mobile Representative]

From Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments. But that's weird. Okay, one judgment anyway. Give it a try.

@Mintmobile.Com Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available taxes and full terms@mint mobile.com.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Big call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi on Thursday morning. And we predicted that would happen yesterday. In fact, we reported it would happen. And I knew it would happen because the President told me it would happen. As you may know, I debriefed him on my trip to Beijing, which I told the Chinese Communists I was going to do. I just want to reiterate that there was, everything was up front okay in this thing because that's who I am. I don't play any games. All right, you want me to speak to you? I'm going to tell you what's on my mind, but I'm not holding anything back. And I'm going to tell you the consequences of everything. So I knew that the phone call was going to be made and it's a very important call. We'll get to it in the second segment. The Talking points memo, however, is on the growing Biden scandal, and it is that it is a scandal. Now the House Oversight Committee is investigating whether President Biden actually knew what he was signing when he didn't sign the executive orders, but an auto pen did. Are you a little confused? So the president issues executive orders. Legally, he can use a machine to sign the orders, but that shouldn't happen unless the president is indisposed. In Biden's case, it happened a shocking amount. And I'll give you the stats in a moment. So the House Oversight Committee wants to know why, what was going on? Did Biden even know what was in these executive orders? Very tough to prove. Very, very tough And Biden deserves due process, as all Americans are. And you know, the right wing anti Biden people are going crazy. You know, he didn't know. He didn't. We don't do that here. What we do is report methodically. And here's what we know. There is no question that all mental acuity questions surround Jill Biden, the First Lady. That is beyond any reasonable doubt. She knew day to day the condition of her husband. Okay. She has not been called in front of the Oversight Committee yet. She will be the following. Well, let me give you a little bit of a primer before we get to the people who have been called. So on May 21, I went on News Nation, Cuomo. And I told Mr. Cuomo and avowed Democrat that this Biden thing was going to be as big as Watergate. Roll tape. Look, if you want to try to justify this unbelievable cover up that's going to rise as high as Watergate. What is the COVID up? Watergate cover? State exam. Worse than Watergate. I'll give you the last word if. Yeah, give it to me because, boy, you're killing yourself. Oh yeah, I'm killing myself. You have a right as an American citizen, Cuomo, to know if your President is infirmed mentally or physically. I agree. The Constitution gave the privilege to the press to keep an eye on these people so that we would know their status and condition. In Watergate, they covered up a crime.

[Guest]

Yes.

[Bill O'Reilly]

If Colonel o' Connor gave a PSA test that showed Biden had cancer and kept it from the public, that is a crime. Okay? So now everybody is saying it's like Watergate. So, you know, I like Cuomo, you know that I go on his program all the time, but he was just being an arrogant ass. You bet. You wait and see what happens here. Because you cannot cover up, right. A mental acuity or a physical situation in the White House. You can't. And it is Watergate. It's worse than Watergate. Probably the Nixon's people covered up crimes, all right? They covered up break ins, they covered up bribery, they covered all that stuff. Okay? So the following people are going to have to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee. Here they are. Former senior advisor Michael Donilon, Senior advisor Anita Dunn, Former Biden Chief of staff Ron Klain, former deputy chief of staff of policy Bruce Reed, former counselor to President Steve Richetti. Now they will retain counsel. They know they're in trouble and they're all going to say the same thing. Oh, we didn't say anything when we were there. It was fine. Oh, no. He knew everything. That's what they're all going to say. They're not going to say, yeah, I lied about it. They're not. And again, it's going to be hard for the Oversight committee to prove anything. It will, because there were days when President Biden was lucid. However, in my opinion, this was a mammoth cover up. And the guy who's in most trouble is the doctor that I just mentioned, o' Connor. He's a colonel. Retired colonel in the army. And he was examining Biden. Roll of tape. How's the President's health?

[Cleta Mitchell]

It is.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And how is his mental cognition? It's excellent. Is there a reason you didn't perform a cognitive test on him? He's here every day. Okay. No. That's a tough one. And if o' Connor did not give the prostate test or did give it and then held it back, because, as you know, President Biden has cancer, prostate cancer, he's going to have to be prosecuted. Now, it might not reach that because this is a committee that's looking at this, not the FBI. It's not the Justice Department. Although Donald Trump has called for an investigation, which. Which means that the Justice Department is going to have to get involved because that's where it has to go. I mean, these pinheaded House people, Congress people, senators. Yeah, they can ask the questions, they can embarrass people, but you need hard evidence. And it's a tough one. It is a tough one. Now, let's get to the executive orders at Play. So from January 1st of this year to Inauguration Day on the 21st, there were 14 executive orders signed in the White House, all of them by executive order, by auto pen. I should say all of them. All 14. Pretty troubling in 2024. Okay, 74% of all EOs signed by auto pen. No excuse. It's an astronomical number. I don't think it's ever, ever been anywhere close to another president doing that. Why? Biden couldn't take the pen and sign the order. Does that take three seconds? Why? Okay, and now the names. All right, you remember that the pardons issued the last few days of Biden's tenure, they were pretty big. All right, here's who got pardoned by auto pen. His brother James, wife Sarah Jones, Biden sister Valerie. Biden Owens, husband John, his brother Francis Biden, General Mark Milley and Dr. Anthony Fauci. I mean, they're huge names. And he couldn't sign their pardons. An autopanna to do it doesn't stack. Doesn't stack. So we're in a position here where this scandal and it is, come on. I mean, if you don't know by now that the President of the United States was virtually incapacitated on certain days and we the people were lied to about it, if you don't know that by now, you don't want to know, you just don't want to know. And this helps President Trump because it will override the controversy du jour. This becomes the bigger story than Trump, you know, banning countries, and we'll get to that in a moment or whatever it may be that day. And it negates the hate Trump media because they had no interest in reporting this story at all, as we know now.

[Joe from Vanta]

Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI automation and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SoC2 or ISO 27001 or a growing enterprise managing vendor risk, Vanta makes it quick, easy and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here.

[LifeLock Representative]

Get [e-mail] this episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off. Terms apply.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And that's the memo. All right, so let's get to the phone call. We'll let the President describe it. Full screen quote. I just included a very good phone call with President Xi of China discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made and agreed to trade deal. Close call lasted approximately one and a half hours and resulted in very positive conclusion. For both countries, the conversation was focused almost entirely on trade. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia, Ukraine or Iran, unquote. That was posted on Truth Social. Okay, so this morning I appeared on our flagship radio station WABC in New York City with Sid Rosenberg. And here's what went down on that.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Go.

[Guest]

I'm going to give you the credit. You're too. Well, actually not too humble. Maybe he'll take the credit. I'm going to give you the credit for this upcoming meeting or conversation between President Trump and President Xi, I think you going to China, you speaking in front of his people, doing what you did a couple of weeks ago, was kind of a linchpin for what's coming up next. Are you willing to accept that credit?

[Donald Trump]

Well, I appreciate you standing in front of my modesty, which doesn't exist. I wasn't surprised, let's put it that way, that the phone call has been arranged. Now, I'm not taking credit for it. It was due. But what I gave the United States of America, what I gave the country, and that's exactly why I did this, I paid for this whole trip myself, was I gave a pathway for negotiations to stop the madness. I provided a vivid pathway to the hard men in Beijing, 13 of them. I said, if you follow this pathway, China will prosper.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay? So, again, it has nothing to do with me on a daily basis, but I did contribute, I think, to the overall strategy that a deal helps both China and the United States, and not only in trade. They got to figure out Taiwan, Putin, Iran, all of that. Now, it is much easier for Donald Trump at this point in history to deal with Xi than Putin, because Putin is psychotic. I am now 100% convinced you don't allow 1 million Russian casualties, 1 million, to invade a country that does you no good whatsoever. Ukraine. And then you continue, despite the fact that Trump offered Putin a good deal to stop fighting. Putin psychotic now. So if I were sent to Moscow, number one, I wouldn't go because they put me in prison, all right? And number two, there's nothing I could say to the people in Moscow, nothing that are going to change Putin. Trump made a mistake on Putin. He didn't know the seriousness of Putin's mental condition. Putin's crazy, okay? Now he can function. But again, you don't allow a million Russians to give up their lives or be severely wounded in Ukraine, and you don't even count the Ukrainian civilians and all of that. Putin care at all? No. That's why he's on my upcoming book, Confronting Evil. He's on the COVID Okay, so I couldn't do anything there. But in China, it's different because the Chinese know they need America. Putin doesn't think he needs anybody. Chinese know they need America economically. And so therefore, I think that this has a chance to tamp everything down. I hope it does. I pray it does. Okay. Okay. Headline, front page, Wall Street Journal. Now, you have to understand something. If you are interested in consuming news in America, I assume you are since you're consuming me right now on radio and television. So Wall Street Journal in their news pages is a left wing situation. In their editorial pages they are not. They lean right on the editorial side, but they lean left on their news coverage. The headline today is law firms that appease Trump face backlash. Okay. The article is that if a law firm settles with the president that it's being punished, some of its lawyers quit, some people won't do business with it, whatever. There is only one pro Trump lawyer mentioned in the entire article. Okay, One. And a lot of lawyers who have helped or worked or support Donald Trump have gotten hurt big time. So therefore the Wall Street Journal tilts it, okay, left saying, no, don't settle with Trump because you'll get hurt. But they ignore the fact that the same thing is going on by the left punishing any attorneys who support Donald Trump. And joining us now is one of them. Cleta Mitchell comes from Pinehurst, North Carolina today. She is the founder and chairman of the Election Integrity Network. So you, after the election of 2020, were involved with Georgia and the controversy down there about whether the votes were counted accurately and you got hurt doing that, correct? Tell us what happened to you.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, thank you, Bill, for having me and letting me talk about this because it's only been one side that's been told for the last 40 years and that's by the left wing media, including the Wall Street Journal news pages. As you pointed out, I was a partner at a large law firm in Washington, D.C. for almost 20 years and I was asked by the White House to go to Georgia the day after the election. So November 4th of 2020. I am an election attorney. I practice campaign finance and election law for many years. And so I was asked to go to Georgia and just to see what was going on and to just check out the election situation. And so I arrived there in the wee hours of the 5th of November and I started looking at what had gone on in the election and realized that the election was a mess. And I will just say that's not a legal term of art. It's just exactly. But it is exactly what happened. So many votes that were cast and counted in violation of state law. People registered at PO Boxes, that's illegal in Georgia. People whose registrations were recorded as having been what the post office record showed were vacant premises, either vacant lots or nobody lived there. And adding all of that up, basically we knew that there were more votes that were cast and counted and were included in the certified total than the margin of victory between President Trump and Joe Biden. So I was one of the President's volunteer lawyers. And that was interesting in and of itself because. Because there had been this real push from the left, just like what you were reading today, where there was this big leftist push starting the day after the election, where law firms were threatened and told that people would take their business away from law firms who represented President Trump in the post election of 2020. So let's start with that. And so here I am, a partner in a big law firm, and I'm volunteering because my firm decided not to accept payment because they didn't want to basically telegraph to the outside world that we were doing anything on behalf of the President. And so fast forward, we filed an election contest, 64 pages, over 1100 pages of exhibits, and we never got a judge appointed to hear the case, which was very odd. We could talk about that on a separate broadcast podcast. But the bottom line is that we ended up, the President wanted to have a conversation with the Secretary of State because we hadn't had a judge appointed, and to see if there might be some way to resolve the case by comparing the data that was included in our litigation with the data that the Secretary of State said that he had in his office that he wouldn't share with us. And so to try to get some resolution before the certification. And.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, let me stop. They never got it. And you believe that there was illegalities involved in the total. I think you believe that Trump won the state, is that correct?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, in all honesty, Bill, and I've said this to the President, I don't think we know who won.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay. And that's absolutely valid. And, and there you go. But there are enough questions whereby it should have been clarified. And it works, right? Okay.

[Cleta Mitchell]

So you do. Following the law.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You did, you did an honest job. Your law firm. Do you want to mention the law firm name? The law firm?

[Cleta Mitchell]

I'd rather not.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Rather not.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So your law. You were down there in your own dime, you do an honest job, you come back to D.C. and they fire.

[Cleta Mitchell]

You know what happened was that the Secretary of State in a phone call that was arranged to discuss the data that was in our lawsuit with the Secretary of State. That phone call was illegally recorded by the Deputy Secretary of State, a woman by the name of Jordan Fuchs, and she was in Florida at the time. She lied about it to the Washington Post, by the way, because Florida is a two party consent state. You're not supposed to record a phone call unless you have the consent of the Other people on the call.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Right.

[Cleta Mitchell]

And she did not obtain that. She recorded the call, then released the tape to the Washington Post the next day. And so that phone call, the president has been quoted in that phone call as saying, we just need to find 12,000 votes. As though he was asking the Secretary of State to go find votes.

[Bill O'Reilly]

No, he was just clarifying how many votes were needed to overturn the state. Look, every honor, any honest broker knows that. But I'm interested in you. I'm interested in you now.

[Cleta Mitchell]

So once, once that transcript was released by the Washington Post, within 24 hours, the Lincoln Project, which is, you know, is run by a bunch of never Trumpers perverted people, they started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices, the firm's offices. We had offices all over the country. And telling people to start, and then listing some of our major corporate clients, which is a matter of public record, and having people call the corporate clients to tell the corporate clients to call their relationship partner to tell the partners that they were going to take their business away from our law firm unless the firm fired me. You personally shut down. Me personally.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, so they threaten your law firm, you better fly fire Cleta Mitchell or we're going to take our business elsewhere. Okay? Correct now.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Correct.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Did any media report that?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Oh, what they reported was that I was forced out of the firm. I ended up resigning from the firm. We reached an agreement. But what they've all reported for four years is that I was the attorney who tried to overturn the election. In Georgia, filing an election contest is not considered.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They didn't report that you were threatened by the Lincoln Project?

[Cleta Mitchell]

No, no, no.

[Bill O'Reilly]

None of that was reported.

[Cleta Mitchell]

None of that was reported. No, no, no. We had to shut down the switchboards in all of our.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Look, I know the horror. Cleta, you know me for a long time. I've been through this. I've been through this time and time and time again. Okay? And that's why I got out. That's why I got out.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, well, I'm just not going to deal with it honestly. Right?

[Cleta Mitchell]

I just. I just said so. I left the law firm in January of 2021, and. And I haven't practiced law since then. But what I spent my time doing, since February 1st of 2021, I've been the senior legal fellow at the Conservative Partnership Institute, and I founded the Election Integrity Network, and I've been working full time on Election Integrity. But every news article, every news article refers to me as the lawyer who tried to help Trump overturn the election in 2020.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And it's a smear.

[Cleta Mitchell]

The other thing. Yes. And then within about a month, just a few weeks later, later, I receive a bar complaint that was. I was originally admitted to the bar in Oklahoma. It's where I'm from. And I practiced law there before I moved to Washington, D.C. in the 1990s. And so I'm a member of the bar in Washington, D.C. and in Oklahoma. And so I had a bar complaint filed against me by 29 people, lawyers I. I'd never heard of. I'd never heard of.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They were organized into a cabal. Let's get Mitchell. Right, right. Okay.

[Cleta Mitchell]

And then what I learned then is that that began a trend, a project founded by David Brock, you may remember.

[Bill O'Reilly]

I know David Brock, smear merchant.

[Cleta Mitchell]

So he finds some. He. He created something called the 65 Project, and they filed bar complaints against every lawyer in America who in any way, shape or form supported President Trump.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Right, right. And that these projects are paid for by people like George Soros. I don't know if Soros directly paid this, but that's where the money comes from. Brock lives off that money. And he makes a lot of money himself. He makes a lot of money to destroy people. To destroy people like you. Right, right. All right, Cleta. And so we have it.

[Cleta Mitchell]

That bar complaint went on, what, the bar complaint?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Go anywhere real quick?

[Cleta Mitchell]

No, but they didn't dismiss it for three years. It was fully brief, but it wasn't dismissed for three years.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So you had to deal with it and. And all of that. Well, we're sorry, of course, but I think you're better off now than you were, and you're helping the country more now.

[Cleta Mitchell]

I always say. Yeah, I say that they, you know, they thought they'd vanquished me, but they made you stronger. They made me. They freed me from billable hours so I could just spend full time working on trying to fix the election.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And I'm very happy that this broadcast here could tell your story, because that's the outrage. They just won't tell the truth. They being the Washington Post of the world, they're not interested in that. All right, Cleta, good luck to you. If anybody ever bothers you again, you come right to me, okay?

[Cleta Mitchell]

I appreciate that, Bill.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Thank you. See you. Three new polls about President Trump versus zoghb favorable to the president. Thousand likely voters. Do you approve or disapprove? 48% approve of the job President Trump is doing. 49% disapprove. Split right down the middle. Trafalgar poll, pro Trump poll. Okay. 1098 likely general election voters. How do you feel about President Trump handling his job? Approve, 54, disapprove 46. That's a very strong number for the president. And the last one is Atlas. This is out of Brazil. But they were the most accurate pollsters in the election of 2024. 3469 adults. Big sample. Okay, do you approve or disprove job Donald Trump is doing? Approve, 45, disapprove 54. So, you know, there's a big. It's almost exactly the opposite of Trafalgar. So joining us now is our go to guy on the polling. John McLaughlin is an honest man. He works for President Trump. I mean, we gotta let you know that he likes Trump, he likes his policies. He polls for Trump, but he's an honest man. All right, so can you explain to us the difference between Trafalgar and Atlas?

[John McLaughlin]

Yes. Well, first of all, it's the difference between likely voters and adults. And we just posted a poll that we did last week at the same time as the Atlas poll was in the field, and we polled 1,000 likely voters modeled after the 2024 election in demographics, and we had Trump's job approval of 51, and his disapproval was 44. And it's a big difference because in the election last year, you only had, you only had 155 million voters go to the polls. There was 90. Over 90 million more eligible adults who didn't show up at the polls. That there's polling. When you do a poll of, what.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Difference does that make? Don't. Shouldn't they have a right to put an opinion on Trump's performance?

[John McLaughlin]

Oh, they can have an opinion, but it's a poll of adults. It's not a poll of likely voters. So you get the disparity. And also when you go through the Atlas sample, they have a cross tab for voted Trump, voted Harris. But in their demographics, they don't tell you how many people that they polled voted for Harris and voted for Trump. And that's been the flaw. We know in our likely voter polls, we used our polling as a strategy to raise his popular vote so we could sweep the battleground states. So we get 50% of the national vote and tariffs is 48%. And that was our strategy. So it's not apples to apples. And when you look at Atlas, yeah, they were most accurate last year because they were, they were doing something that replicated actual likely voters. These polls that are coming out now where you've Got. I mean, the New York Times put out a poll. They had only had 37% Trump voters. The Washington Post, ABC had only 34.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah, I know, but we don't even bother with them anymore because we know how corrupt it is. They had their thumb on the scale, to use a cliche. How do you think Donald Trump is doing, though? I mean, you're seeing numbers every day. It's obvious he was successful or is successful closing the border. Most people do support the ICE raids and getting that whole thing under control, but the tariff situation is roiled the American people and I think divided it. Would I be wrong in saying that?

[John McLaughlin]

Well, we have. Well, they don't grasp it as well as the tax cuts. In the national poll that we put up, 58% want them to get the tax cuts passed. 20%, secure the border, 7%, you know, lower the price of oil and gas, 7%, strength of national defense. But at the same time, we asked in the same poll, do you think the tariffs are hurt or have they helped? And 47% think they've helped. Right now, as of last week, only 38% said hurt. So the jury's still out on that. It's a much more complex issue.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Sure, but it really isn't. You know why, John? Because what it's going to come down to, and this will clarify itself by November, I think, is whether people are paying more money for the essentials of life. That's what it's going to be. I mean, people don't have to understand who's paying it and where it's coming from. And this one's there and that steel here, and the cards are there and agricultural. They're going to walk into the grocery store and they're going, I'm getting a break under Trump, or I'm paying more under Trump, and that's what's going to decide it. Am I wrong?

[John McLaughlin]

No, you're exactly right. And that's why the tariffs issue is secondary and much, much less important than passing the tax cuts. Because if we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this. We know this for our polling. The tech. The Trump tax cuts lapse this year.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah. And everybody pays more. There's no doubt about it. So it is a vital thing. And that's why Trump is behind it so hard. I think he's going to get it passed, but there's going to be some Senate modifications, and Trump will live with that. He knows he has to negotiate it. But the Democrats have downside, too, here, because if they vote en bloc not to pass it. Then easily that anger when people's taxes go up can be transferred to the Democratic Party. Right?

[John McLaughlin]

Right. But hopefully the taxes never go up. But the Democrats, every Democrat in the Senate and the House is on record as voting against extending the tax cuts. So they're all voted for the largest tax increase in the history of America. And we got to hold them accountable.

[Bill O'Reilly]

We got to get crazy. And they, and they hide behind this ridiculous, oh, we just want to tax the rich. But it isn't that. It's everybody. And, you know, it's the same thing about Medicaid. Oh, they want to throw people off Medicaid. No, they want to regulate it, they want to refine it. But anyway, political lies are, you know, they're never ending. Last question for you. I think President Trump would have been better if he had not done so much so fast. It would have been easier for him to convince the American people of why he's doing what he's doing. But because the change has been so massive, because the Biden administration was so horrible that it all came at once, and it's almost too much for the average person who doesn't do what you and I do for a living to grasp it.

[Mint Mobile Representative]

Your gut affects everything, even your mood. So Ollie created two brand new products to take care of your insides. Ollie Big 10 Probiotic has 10 strains of probiotics, their most ever, to support a healthy gut, microbiome, immune system and stress response. And Ollie Super Good Superfoods delivers 15 superfoods in tasty gummy form. Find them at ollie.com and exclusively at Walmart. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, so.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They'Re more subjected to propaganda. So if he had just not done and just incrementally done it, I think you'd be in a stronger position. Do you agree with?

[John McLaughlin]

You may be right, but it's hard to get him to do that. You know him, personality wise.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah, I know.

[John McLaughlin]

Biden left the country in such a Mess. He has a 40 favorable 56 unfavorable outlast ball. The guy left such a mess that Trump, you know, he's got to solve wars in Ukraine, the Middle east, secure the border, and try to get the economy to grow all at the same time. And you're dealing with a president now who has survived to two assassination attempts after they tried to put him in jail. So if we don't get the Trump tax Cut, passed, have a growing economy and we lose control of the House in the midterms, then we've got a big problem because they'll impeach him again.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah, boss, for sure. I'm writing about that in my message today, tomorrow about the midterms and now how it's starting to shape up. So, John, look, if you see any trends, just do me a favor, let us know about the president, both pro and con, because I think our audience is very. We're numbers people here. We don't want the propaganda. We want the hard numbers. And we really appreciate it, as always. Thanks for helping us out. Okay, Boulder, that guy who attacked anti Semitic guy, Mohammed Sabri Soliman overstayed his visa and then did the Biden con. Oh, I want asylum. And the Biden people said, sure, in the country, it's just so bad. I can't tell you how bad Biden was. And once again, that Chinese had no use for him at all. None. Okay, but here's what I said about Biden's not enforcing immigration law. And I said this On 6-12-24, about a year ago. Go. Do I believe there are terrorists here right now plotting to kill us? Yes. Do I believe they came across the open border between the USA and Mexico? Yes, I do. That's why I would never, under any circumstances even consider voting for Joe Biden. And you're going to see more, unfortunately, of people who were here got in under Biden failing to obey the law, and boom. Just a note to my producers. We'll do the sanctuary city tomorrow. I want to spend a little time on that. The Trump administration put out a list of sanctuary counties and cities that they're going after. We'll do it tomorrow. Along with Washington, D.C. is receding now, saying maybe we don't want to be a sanctuary place. Pbs, NPR are suing Trump because Trump says, we're not going to give you 55 billion anymore. It's exactly the same as the universities. Exactly the same. So PBS and NPR are just left wing and we're paying for it. No, no. Now they say, oh, well, we're going to see you because it's violation our freedom of speech. And then the loopy person who runs npr, Katherine Marr, says this go the former NPR editor Yuri Berliner. He accused the network of having what he called a, a lack of viewpoint diversity. How do you respond to those critiques?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, I first of all respond by saying we're a nonpartisan news organization. We seek to be able to provide a range of different Viewpoints in terms of who we bring on air, the stories that we tell.

[Bill O'Reilly]

It's just bull, you know, it really is. She knows what she's saying isn't true. Okay? I don't know whether she lives in a bubble or not. I don't care. But anybody who listens to NPR, watches PBS, anybody 5 years old, you would know. Ukraine attacked Russian aircraft within Russia, five different bases blew up, a whole bunch of planes. Another embarrassment for Putin. Doesn't really care. And this Istanbul, Ukraine things, living nowhere. I don't know if Trump can get Putin. I think Putin may be so psychologically damaged at this point, I'm not sure. But my thrust in Beijing was don't. Don't get in bed with Putin. Things are not going to end well for Putin. You heard it here. New York City has an epidemic of thugs, violent thugs attacking police, no question. Why, why wouldn't you? You're not. You're not held accountable. Two guys beat up two cops in the Bronx. Sixteen adjournments, one six going on for a year and a half. Still hasn't gotten into court. Big headline in New York Post. Oh, the cops are getting the cops. Of course. Of course. What's going to happen? More crazy stuff from the progressives who control New York City and State. Assaults on cops. This once that I had are up 63% in six years. Smart life. Okay, let me just put this over here. Smart Life. Told you, when the tariff stuff start, don't sell stocks hold in. Remember that, Right? So those of you follow my advice in Smart Life segment, you got your money back unless you had terrible socks. Now, I'm starting to sell some of my stocks. Not all of them, but the ones that are speculative. And I'll tell you why. I don't think that this turbulence in the world with China, with Ukraine, Putin, Iran. I think they're going to have to surrender the mullahs. But this economic war and this, this is not going to be short term. And it goes up and it goes down. It goes in and goes out. Sure. Money, my money, I work hard for it. I'm trimming back a bit now. Right away, I'm watching Smart Life. I got to be honest with you. That's what we do here, all right? I'm not panicking. I'm keeping my core. But the more speculative, I'm selling. Bill's Book Club. If Oprah can have one, why can't I? Killing Lincoln is our bestseller. Of all the books, more than 3 million copies, that was our first one. There's a new book on Lincoln out called 1861 the lost peace. It's by Jay Winick. All right, so if you're a Lincoln Civil War person, you want to check out Jay's work. That's the Bill's book club. Okay, so the fourth Commandment. Some say the fifth, but in my religion, Catholicism, and in the Torah, I believe, believe the fourth commandment is honor thy father and thy mother. And it's problematic because there are a lot of fathers and mothers who are not good. Let's be honest, okay? They're not. They didn't treat their children well. They don't treat each other well. They're just not good. Do you still have to honor them? The answer is yes. You have to be respectful. You don't have to embrace. You don't have to make excuses. You don't have to pander. Respectful on their respective days. You give them gifts, you send them a card. Don't overdo it if you don't feel they deserve it. But most parents, my parents were flawed. They were children of the depression. But I loved them and I respected them to the very end. And I did everything on earth I could do to make their lives easier. And I wasn't a scorecard. They did this, they did that. I didn't do that because I honored the fourth Commandment. I mean, it's pretty clear now. Sometimes you can honor. Sometimes the destructive nature of parents is so bad that you can't. I understand that. And millions of people are facing it. I got it. But if you can form some kind of kindness, a detente try, you'll be a much better person for it. Thank you for watching and listening to the no Spin News News Sunday column. See you again on Monday.