Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - March 28, 2025

Summary

Summary of "Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - March 28, 2025"

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis presents a comprehensive episode on March 28, 2025, hosted by Bill O’Reilly. This episode delves into several pressing issues, including a national security mishap, media misreporting, immigration enforcement, party politics, and media bias. The discussion is enriched with expert opinions, notable quotes, and critical analysis, providing listeners with a nuanced understanding of these topics.

---

1. National Security Meeting Blunder

Overview: Bill O’Reilly opens the episode by addressing a significant national security incident involving National Security Advisor Mike Walz. Walz inadvertently allowed journalist Jeffrey Goldberg from The Atlantic to access a confidential meeting on the secure messaging app Signal, which discussed strategies to combat Houthi terrorists in Yemen.

Key Points:

• Incident Details: Goldberg's unintended inclusion in the secure thread raises concerns about national security protocols.
• Accountability: O’Reilly emphasizes the need for accountability, questioning how Goldberg’s number was accessed by Walz and advocating for FBI investigation.

Notable Quotes:

• Bill O’Reilly at [01:02]: “This is the last day of this national security blunder. I hope. Unless there's new stuff that comes out, I don't think there will be.”
• O’Reilly at [05:15]: “If Goldberg said, hey, let me into the thread. And then somebody said, okay, we'll sneak you in. That's a scam.”

2. Media Accountability and Misreporting

Overview: The discussion shifts to media accountability, focusing on the Wall Street Journal's misreporting regarding former President Trump's alleged derogatory remarks about World War I soldiers—a claim refuted by former National Security Advisor John Bolton.

Key Points:

• Wall Street Journal’s Reporting: Melissa Corn’s article inaccurately cited Trump's supposed offensive comments, which O’Reilly and Bolton dismiss as false.
• Journalistic Integrity: O’Reilly criticizes the Wall Street Journal for biased reporting and emphasizes the importance of factual accuracy in journalism.

Notable Quotes:

• John Bolton at [08:08]: “According to what that article said, the President made disparaging remarks about our soldiers... That was simply false.”
• Bill O’Reilly at [08:29]: “We have misreporting terrible journalism on the part of the Wall Street Journal. I'm surprised. I'm disappointed.”

3. Immigration Enforcement and Sanctuary Cities

Overview: A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to immigration enforcement, featuring an in-depth interview with Tom Homan, a former ICE officer. The conversation explores the challenges of deporting undocumented migrants, the impact of sanctuary cities, and the current administration's immigration policies.

Key Points:

• Deportation Practices: Homan discusses the distinction between deporting criminal and non-criminal undocumented migrants, asserting that sanctuary cities compel ICE to arrest even non-criminals due to lack of cooperation.
• Sanctuary Cities: The dialogue highlights the tension between federal immigration enforcement and local jurisdictions that adopt sanctuary policies.
• Administration Policies: Critique of President Biden’s immigration strategies, suggesting intentional border insecurity for political gains.

Notable Quotes:

• Tom Homan at [11:04]: “I think he's the greatest president in my lifetime and especially when it comes to border security and immigration enforcement and national security.”
• Bill O’Reilly at [13:02]: “Now one of the beefs against Homeland Security is they are not, they are deporting non-criminal migrants along with the criminals.”

4. Discussion with Dr. Seth Wright on Democrat Party Challenges

Overview: Bill O’Reilly engages in a dialogue with Dr. Seth Wright, an assistant teaching professor of Political Science at Penn State University, Harrisburg. The conversation centers on the Democratic Party's declining popularity and internal challenges.

Key Points:

• Party Popularity: Dr. Wright attributes Democrats' low favorability ratings to a lack of effective storytelling and disconnection from voter priorities.
• Leadership and Revitalization: The discussion considers potential Democratic leaders, with Dr. Wright mentioning Governor Shapiro as a possible revitalizing figure, although O’Reilly expresses skepticism about his national influence.
• Voter Sentiment: The exchange touches on whether Democrats face genuine disapproval or voter disengagement due to perceived irrelevance.

Notable Quotes:

• Dr. Seth Wright at [23:32]: “Democrats writ large have a serious identity and storytelling problem... this trend we're seeing isn't disapproval, it's disengagement.”
• Bill O’Reilly at [25:07]: “That’s based on performance, not perception. You see what I mean? You’re unpopular.”

5. Media Bias and Corporate Culture

Overview: In the concluding segments, O’Reilly critiques major media corporations, emphasizing their left-leaning biases and the challenges faced by conservatives within these institutions. He shares insights from a private conversation with former President Trump regarding media manipulation and corporate agendas.

Key Points:

• Corporate Bias: O’Reilly asserts that organizations like Disney and Comcast enforce liberal ideologies, impeding fair reporting and conservative voices.
• Media Competition: He contrasts Fox News’ approach, which supports traditional conservative viewpoints, with other networks' entrenched liberal stances.
• Public Perception: The episode highlights public distrust in mainstream media, supported by polling data indicating low favorability toward NPR and PBS due to perceived liberal bias.

Notable Quotes:

• Bill O’Reilly at [22:12]: “You cannot prosper inside these major media corporations unless you are a left winger.”
• O’Reilly at [23:01]: “I know this was going to happen because I had an extensive 90-minute conversation with Donald Trump on January 2nd about the media.”

---

Conclusion

Bill O’Reilly’s episode of No Spin News and Analysis provides a thorough examination of critical national issues, intertwining personal insights, expert testimonies, and pointed critiques of media practices and political strategies. Through engaging dialogue and factual discourse, the episode aims to inform and provoke thought among its listeners, maintaining O’Reilly’s trademark commitment to presenting "No Spin. Just Facts."

---

For more in-depth analysis and updates, visit BillOReilly.com.

Transcript

[Shopify Advertiser]

This episode is brought to you by Shopify. Upgrade your business with Shopify, home of the number one checkout on the planet. Shop pay boosts conversions up to 50%, meaning fewer carts going abandoned and more sales going cha ching. So if you're into growing your business, get a commerce platform that's ready to sell wherever your customers are. Visit shopify.com to upgrade your selling today.

[Progressive Advertiser]

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible financial geniuses, monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to progressive and save hundreds. Visit progressive.com to see if you could save Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.

[Bill O'Reilly]

This is the last day of this national security blunder. I hope. Unless there's new stuff that comes out, I don't think there will be. I'll wrap it up for you fairly succinctly. The media, of course, you know, they love this kind of thing. I recognize the importance of the story and it is important because we can't have this again and if it happens again, people are going to have to get fired. But let me walk through it where we are and but I believe today will be the end for me and responsible people. The hey Trumpers will try to drag it out as long as they can. All right, so let's review. That is the subject of this evening Talking Points Memo. Apparently, National Security Advisor Mike Walz accidentally allowed a very liberal journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg from Atlantic magazine into the meeting, which was on an app called Signal. It was a national security meeting, as you probably know, discussing how to attack the Houthi terrorists in Yemen. So there were dials made. People got on the thread and one of them was Jeffrey Goldberg. And nobody knew it because it was a mistake made by Walz. Now, there are unanswered questions here. How did you have Jeffrey Goldberg's number? Mr. Walls? He's a top Trump hater. That should be answered. And Goldberg himself should answer some questions to the FBI. I don't know why Cash Patel hasn't dispatched FBI agents to the talk to Goldberg about how this all happened. It's national security. Maybe it has happened and the press doesn't know about it. I certainly don't know about it. But it should happen. Goldberg should be interviewed by FBI agents. Right. Okay. Now, Walter on TV last night, Laura Ingram, Fox News. Roll the tape.

[Laura Ingraham]

Right. You got somebody else's number on someone else's contact. So of course I didn't see this loser in the group. It looked like Someone else. Now, whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical mean is something we're trying to figure out. So your, your staffer did not put his contact information. No.

[Tom Homan]

But how did it end up.

[Laura Ingraham]

Well, that's what we're trying to, that's what we're trying to figure out.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, but that's a pretty big problem.

[Laura Ingraham]

That is what we've got the best technical minds. Right?

[Bill O'Reilly]

That's just.

[Laura Ingraham]

And that's where, I mean, I'm sure everybody out there has had a contact where you it was said one person and then a different phone number.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Not me because I don't do that. If I have a serious conversation, it's on a hard line where if you tap a hard line, it's felony. I don't do signal. I don't know what signal is. And none of our national security people should be using it either. Okay. Because if Jeffrey Goldberg can get on it, so can the Chinese and the Russians. Okay? Aye, aye, aye. But at least Walsh owned up to it. It's in his purview. But I want a little more information. And Laura Ingraham did her job. I mean, she framed it the proper way. Now, I don't think anybody's going to get fired here. But Trump's embarrassed and he's angry about it. I know that to be true. But it's not a scandal, all right? It's a blunder. Okay? Scandal is far, far different. But not to the hate Trump media. Go, Wolf. This hearing is going to be hijacked by this scandal and that's really what it is for the Trump administration. We saw two Republican senators point to the fact that they plan to ask questions about this scandal inside of a closed door hearing which is going to take place later this afternoon.

[Tom Homan]

If anything, I would say the scandal.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Looks worse for the Trump White House on the second day even than it did initially. Now over on Fox News, pundits were trying their best to downplay the scandal, though even there a few had to admit that this is kind of a big deal. Until what's the scandal? That somebody made a mistake and let this weasel Goldberg in. That's a blunder with no collusion. That would be a scandal if Goldberg said, hey, let me into the thread. And then somebody said, okay, we'll sneak you in. That's a scam. Some nit width dialing a wrong number or whatever happened is a blunder. Now if it upgrades. And that's why the FBI needs to speak to Goldberg. All right? And that's the Memo. Now, here's a media scandal. Kind of Wall Street Journal gets delivered to my door every day. The editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal are fair and backed with facts. The newspapers tilt left, but not crazy, right? So primarily a financial newspaper. There is a reporter, Melissa Corn, okay. She is a deputy bureau chief of the media team. Wow. Got a big title. She's trying to stick up for Jeffrey Goldberg. Trying to say this man is credibility. As I reported yesterday, he was the guy who reported that President Trump in his first term went to Europe and said that US soldiers killed in World War I were suckers. That never happened. And I investigated it. Okay, never happened. But Melissa somehow writes, quote, In September 2020, Goldberg reported that Trump referred to soldiers killed in battle during World War I as losers and suckers, citing multiple anonymous sources said they heard the remarks. Trump contested the reporting, though his chief of staff at the time confirmed he had used those words. Not true. Not true. The chief of staff was John Kelly. Now, Kelly excoriated Trump because Trump fired him and called Trump all kinds of names, but never said that we can find. And we did a big search that Trump said dead World War I soldiers were losers and suckers. And a guy in the room who also hates Donald Trump. You know him. Former National Security adviser John Bolton said this go.

[John Bolton]

And according to what that article said, the President made disparaging remarks about our soldiers, the people buried at the Anmarn Cemetery, in connection with the decision for him not to go to the ceremony that was planned that afternoon. And that was simply false. I don't know who told the author that, but that was false.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, that was false. Bolton was there following Trump around all day. And then I talked to myself, the other people who were there. Nobody heard that, even anonymously. So we have misreporting terrible journalism on the part of the Wall Street Journal. I'm surprised. I'm disappointed. So, Mr. Homan, I've noticed when you appear on the network news and some cables that the questioning is often hostile to you. It's not neutral questioning. It's like, hey, what are you doing? How many people did you throw out today? And I'm sure you noticed that too. And I'm saying to myself, why? Do you have any idea why that so many, so many of the American press corps are antagonistic to you? I rely on physical precious metals like gold and silver to protect my savings. And the only company I trust is American Hartford Gold. A tax advantaged gold IRA can protect your savings from inflation, recessions and more. You can even roll over your 401k or IRA tax and penalty free. With thousands of five star ratings and an A from the Better Business Bureau, American Hartford Gold has delivered billions in precious metals. Trust American Hartford Gold. To help you, call or text American Hartford Gold. Tell them Bill O'Reilly sent you for up to $15,000 of free silver on qualifying orders. 8663-2655-7686-6326, 5576. Or you can text BILL to 998-899 again, 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998-899.

[Josh Hammer]

Like a bull in a china shop, Donald Trump came in to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C. but with his bold refor so many legal questions nationwide injunctions, are they constitutional? What's the deal with birthright citizenship? What about the administrative state? Can he actually clean the deep state and end the politicization of the federal bureaucracy? I'm Josh Hammer, host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer. Subscribe to America on Trial with Josh Hammer for your daily updates on all of these questions and more.

[Tom Homan]

Well, I think it's because I serve President Trump. I mean, you know, when I work for I was a third in command ICE under Barack Obama, we had over 409,000 removals. And they weren't hostile then. So I think working for President Trump makes me hostile. Anybody that serves President Trump. But look, I'm proud to work for President Trump. I think he's the greatest president in my lifetime and especially when it comes to border security and immigration enforcement and national security. So they don't bother me. Look, if I can live with their heads rent free, I'm okay with that. But because I'm going to keep telling the truth, whether they like it or not, my talking points never change. I don't care if I'm talking to a conservative or talking to liberal, they're going to hear the same thing because what I give them is facts. They can like it or not like it, but they're going to hear the truth.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, but they don't like it. Now, when you were working for President Obama, who deported more undocumented people than any other president in history, all right, and most of those were at the border that got kicked back fast. And they didn't have this asylum con that they rose up under President Biden, when you were working for Barack Obama, in my research on him from my book Confronting the Presidents, he didn't want an open border. He didn't want chaotic immigration. Am I correct there?

[Tom Homan]

Well, his first term, like I said, we removed a lot of people in the first term and largely because we're counting border patrol removals with ICE removals. And that's how come the number got so big. But he was pushing for that. He was pushing for more removals. But under the second term, the Obama term, we pretty much got shut down. I mean, once he got the name deporter in chief, operations really slowed down. And that's one of the reasons at the end of that administration that I decided to retire, because after four years doing that, I was tired of it. But in the beginning he was about securing the border. In the last four years he was not.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And you think it was political pressure obviously from the left that caused that?

[Tom Homan]

Absolutely.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay. Now one of the beefs against Homeland Security is they are not, they are deporting non criminal migrants along with the criminals. And I believe that's true to some extent. Because how could you possibly know? When you go sweep a whole bunch of people say you're a criminal migrant, married to a person who isn't a criminal, stuff like that. How valid is that criticism that ICE is now deporting people quickly without due process that aren't criminals?

[Tom Homan]

Well, they all get due process. I mean the non criminals, where does the most non criminals get arrested? Sanctuary cities. And I've said this for two months, Sanctuary city is going to get exactly what they don't want. More agents in their communities and more collateral rest. Because if we can't arrest a bad guy in the county jail, one agent arrests one criminal alien and they're going to release them like, like the major cities this country, sanctuary cities. You're going to release them back in the community. Okay, fine. We're still going to do our job, which means we're going to go to the community and we're going to find him. And when we find them, most likely they're with others. Others that are illegal in the United States but not a criminal. Well, we're not going to tell ICE agents, forget the ultra tech, ignore the immigration law, walk away from these people. No, they're going to come too. So when you look at the collaterals and non criminals, most of them arrested in sanctuary cities because they forced us in that position, we're going to arrest them.

[Bill O'Reilly]

That's an important point. So when you do a sweep, if you find a non criminal migrant, that person gets taken into custody. Correct.

[Tom Homan]

To be clear, when we do a target enforcement operation, we know exactly who we're looking for and we're most likely we're going to find them. And when we go to that location, look for that target, that criminal target, many times, most times he's with others. Especially if they're at a work site, they're coming too. So sanctuary cities are forcing us into that situation. So if you, I've said this many times, let us into jail, that means more, less agents in the neighborhood, that means less collaterals. But they refused to assist us. So we're going to keep doing what we're doing.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Just to be clear, when you do an enforcement sweep, it is based upon information provided about criminal aliens, is that correct? Local, state, federal information, right?

[Tom Homan]

That's exactly right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, stop, stop.

[Tom Homan]

I wouldn't call it a sweet bill. I called it a target enforcement operation. We have a target. We got a sheet. Who's the alien's name? What's his immigration record, what's his criminal record? Where most likely will we find him? And it has to be approved by supervisors. We go on the street looking for somebody. We have a whole fugitive operation sheet that details who this person is we're looking for.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And where do you get that information? From the states, from the locals. Where does that come from?

[Tom Homan]

Through various databases that we use at ice. I can't tell you all of them because the law enforcement sensitive, but we do targeting based on criminal databases. We use all sorts of social media. We use a lot of things I don't want to discuss here. But we create those target bases so.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You get this stuff. And if there's an undocumented alien who is not a criminal, they get swept up, they get deported sometimes and it depends on the process. Am I correct?

[Tom Homan]

Yes.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right. Now Michelle Wu in Boston is heading for collision with Tom Holman who's speaking to me right now again this weekend. She basically said we're not, we're not going to cooperate on any level. We want undocumented people in the city of Boston. And she's backed up by the Governor of Massachusetts, Maura Healey. Do you have any plans to take action against Mayor Wu and Governor Healy?

[Tom Homan]

Actually the first show where I can make this announcement. So as I promised at cpac, I was going to go to Boston. I'm going to bring hell with me. And we did. I was in Boston last Tuesday. I started an operation with ICE, HSI, ERO, FBI, ATF, DEA, US Marshals in the State Department. And in five day operation we arrested 370 illegal aliens in Boston and the surrounding communities in Massachusetts. And 205 of those were significant public safety threats, including four murderers, child rapists, armed robbers, a couple Interpol red nose arrests. We arrested a lot of bad people in the last five days in Massachusetts, many of them in Boston. We just put the numbers again today. You're the first show I've actually been able to talk about this. The numbers just got put out today, bill.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Excellent. But Ms. Wu is defiant even in the face of those incredible stats, and they are incredible. If you know the city of Boston, it's not New York City, it's not nearly that large. So I'm wondering whether the next step for the Justice Department it wouldn't be, would be the Attorney General Bondi is going to go after people like Michelle Wu for violating some tenet of federal law. Do you believe that will happen?

[Tom Homan]

I hope it will happen. I know Pam Bonney's already put sanctuary cities on notice. I know she's already sued a couple. I sent that report to Pam Bond this morning, who we arrested in Boston and the surrounding area. And the public safety threat that we had to take off the street because if we got to go to the street and arrest people like this, the job of ICE is already dangerous. But to go arrest an aggravated felon, murder, public safety threat in the general public not only puts the officer at risk, it puts the community at risk. So I sent the numbers this morning to doj. So I think Pam Bonney will take action and do what she can do. But she's already started suing sanctuary cities. So, you know, God bless Pam Bonney. I think she's, I think she's going to do the right thing and I think she's going to try to hold these sanctuary cities accountable in courts.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, so it'll be civil litigation, not criminal litigation. Correct.

[Tom Homan]

I'll leave that up to Pam Bondi. We'll see what happens.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But it would be amazing to see, you know, a big city mayor or a state governor like Pritzker in Illinois or even, you know, here, Hochul in New York. She plays a double game. The damage that the Biden administration did to the country, and I know this is a political question, but it has troubled me from the very beginning. Seems to me to be incalculable as far as the treasury is concerned. Crime is concerned, social upheaval is concerned. Do you have any idea why Joe Biden opened that border for three and a half years? Do you have any idea why that man did that?

[Tom Homan]

No. I can only guess. And I've said many times I worked for six presidents down, Ronald Reagan, even when Clinton Obama took steps as we discussed to try to take action to secure the border. No one did more than President Trump. He was unprecedented at his success. We had the most secure border in my lifetime. But Joe Biden's the first president in my lifetime who came into office and unsecured a border on purpose. That wasn't mismanagement, it wasn't incompetence. He knew exactly what he was doing, along with Alejandro Mayorkas.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But there must be chat, though. There must be chat in Homeland Security and in, in the Border Patrol precincts about the why of all this. What did he think he was accomplishing?

[Tom Homan]

I think they saw future political benefit and let millions of people into this country. Remember when he did, when he did everything to secure the border, what else did he do? He overturned the Trump census rule, which means millions of people released in sanctuary cities will be counted next census, which will lead to more seats in House for the Dems. I think they saw a future political benefit by releasing millions of people in sanctuary cities in this country. That is my belief.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Final question. California has 50% of the undocumented migrants. Newsom is now backpedaling, as you know. But LA and San Francisco are still sanctuary cities. Do you expect anything to change in California?

[Tom Homan]

I can tell you ICE is going to. We'll be going to LA and San Francisco very soon. In sanctuary cities, we can't arrest a bad guy in jail. We'll double the man force in those cities, but we're going to do our job. Sanctuary. Now, if you're a sanctuary, you want to step aside and watch us protect your communities, then have at it. Just don't get in the way. Don't cross that line of normally harboring, concealing illegal alien. Don't cross that line of impeding us, because there will be consequences. But we're coming. We're going to do this job President Trump promised American people. We're going to do this. American people giving a mandate, this is the number one issue. We're going to keep President Trump's promise. We're going to be going to every sanctuary city and arresting public safety threats, because that's what the American people want.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right? Unless the court, Supreme Court says you can't do a certain thing, you're not going to defy the federal court order, correct?

[Tom Homan]

No, we're not going to do that. We're not. The Biden administration, who ignored the courts on forgiveness of student loan, they told me he couldn't do it. He did it and he fought him every step of the way on that. Well, no, this is a law and order administration. We're going to do the right thing. Absolutely.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Mr. Holman, you're welcome any time. Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today.

[Tom Homan]

Thank you, sir. I appreciate you.

[Bill O'Reilly]

I want to thank Mr. Homan again for being kind enough to come in here. We know everybody is after him for an interview. Now I'd like you to tell me what you thought of that Interview [e-mail] Name in town if you wish to apply billoriley.com Good, bad, too hard, too soft. Did I leave anything out? You know, give me your review. I like those reviews. Joining us now is a guy who's going to give me a different point of view, which is what we want here. His name is Dr. Seth Wright. He is the assistant teaching professor of Political silent at Penn State University, Harrisburg. Am I making any mistakes here? Dr.

[Dr. Seth Wright]

Well, you mentioned that the, the one who might, the one who might revitalize the Democrat Party is Michelle Obama. I would disagree. I am watching the governor of the commonwealth, Governor Shapiro, and he's been going public. He's governed over divided government in the past, has very broad support here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and he might be the one to step up to the plate and revitalize the Democrat Party on a national level.

[Bill O'Reilly]

He would have to do. He has to start tomorrow. Tomorrow is when he'd have to start because nobody knows him. And it takes a very, very long time for a politician to get known in the United States because of the intrusion of the cell phones. It's not like it used to be. We live in a Balkanized media world. It's very hard for people to lock in. And you're correct. I like Governor Shapiro in a sense that I think he's an honest man. But for the American people to come to know him, extremely difficult ride. He's going to have to raise a billion dollars and I don't know if he can do that.

[Dr. Seth Wright]

That's the real story here, right beyond the polling numbers. Simply put, Democrats writ large have a serious identity and storytelling problem. Folks who are being surveyed about the likability or favorability of the Democrats, they're not just mad about nothing. They may be mad because they feel Democrats aren't addressing what matters to them, whether that's immigration, prices that are too high, peace in Ukraine or Gaza, global conflict, or just the sense that the world is spinning dangerously off access. The idea that birds of a feather should vote together, the vote blue, no matter who messaging, this no longer resonates. So this trend we're seeing isn't disapproval, it's disengagement.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Well, I disagree with you now. I think it's disapproval of Biden and Harris, Biden's administration and Harris's campaign. I think most Americans my belief, and maybe I'm wrong about this, but I don't think so. Most Americans are not ideological.

[Josh Hammer]

Like a bull in the China shop, Donald Trump came in to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C. but with his bold reform and rejuvenation agenda comes so many legal questions nationwide. Injunctions, Are they constitutional? What's the deal with birthright citizenship? What about the administrative state? Can he actually clean the deep state and end the politicization of the federal bureaucracy? I'm Josh Hammer, host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer. Subscribe to America on Trial with Josh Hammer for your daily updates on all of these questions and more.

[Mike Slater]

Hey, I'm Mike Slater. I have a podcast called Politics by Faith. We have a very simple mission. We take the news of the day and we filter it through a biblical worldview. So here's the big story of the day. What does the Bible say about it and how can we apply it? It's amazing. There's nothing new under the sun. The Bible has something to say about everything that's going on today. So basically we thumped the Bible over on Politics by Faith. I think we ought to keep MAGA going. And I think the way to take it beyond just a political victory into a true rebuilding and awakening and revival in America is to make sure that this is all grounded in biblical principles. And that's what we do on the podcast Politics by Faith. And you can subscribe to Politics by Faith wherever you're listening to the show right now.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They're not. They just want to earn a living and have a happy life and be responsible and raise their families. And you're right, they don't want all this turbulence all over the place. But they're not wedded to a party. The fastest growing party is the independent registration, as you know. So. But they see performance and Biden was so horrible and Kamala was such a poor candidate that that's what drove or is driving the Democratic numbers down.

[Dr. Seth Wright]

One of the key functions of a political party is to develop new candidates. This is one area where the Democrat Party totally fumbled the bag. Back to some of the recent polling. 27% of respondents in recent polls hold a favorable view of Democrats. The challenge with any kind of poll analysis is finding the M.O. just the right words to understand voter sentiment. Democrats are Brussels sprouts, popular right now, 27%. That's a low opinion figure usually reserved for, you know, people who wear socks with sandals. That's how unpopular they are right now. So.

[Bill O'Reilly]

That'S based on performance, not perception. You see what I mean? You're unpopular. If you're playing for Penn State and you fumble a football four times in the first half, you're unpopular. That's what happened to the Democratic Party. Their policies were so terrible. And as I pointed out earlier, you didn't hear Bernie Sanders or Cassio Torques go, yeah, we should shouldn't have an open border. Everybody got behind Biden, and then when they found out that he was, you know, out in the ozone layer, they bailed on him. But I think performance is driving it down. Last word.

[Dr. Seth Wright]

What I don't know is whether anyone inside of the Democrat Party machine still has a wrench in hand or if the engine's just running on groupthink fumes. Because when a system is really humming along without resistance, without any kind of challenge, or someone, you know, yelling from under the hood that the timing's off or the belt slipping, it doesn't matter how polished the dashboard looks, they're going to miss what matters. You forget why the engine was built in the first place. Consensus is dangerous when there's a dearth of deliberation. So what I don't know is who in the Democrat Party is going to go 10 toes down, is paying attention, and is ready to stand on business?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Yeah, I don't know either. I think Shapiro, as you pointed out, is doing a good job in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but he doesn't have the power now. He doesn't have the money, he doesn't have the profile. So I'm not sure whether he's going to be the guy. Hey, Doctor, thanks very much. We appreciate your point of view. Thanks for coming on Media Madness. So we do this segment every night pretty much. And I know a lot of you are bored with it and don't care about the media. And I understand. But the danger that a disintegrating media poses to a free society is substantial. And you should know the bigger picture here. Now, President Trump doesn't like certain media, and I don't blame him. And I would probably do similar things if I were president, because the media has attacked me long before Donald Trump, by the way, long before, in a vile, vicious way, because I'm so powerful. And they don't like what I say, the liberal media. All right, so today the associated pressures have been banned from the Oval Office in The White House grounds, because Trump believes they don't report fairly on him. Which is true. They don't. It's true. Okay. But Trump used the Gulf of America, Gulf of Mexico stuff to say, well, if you're not going to abide by an executive order, because remember, Trump signed executive order now, it's now the Gulf of America. But if you're not going to abide by it, you can't be here at the White House. That was the excuse to boot them. So the Associated Press went into court today to get the ban lifted by the judges. I don't know if they're going to be able to do that. President of the United States has a right to regulate what media is on his property. He's in a White House. Right. So I don't see that, but maybe it'll happen. So the AP wants to use the courts to get back in at the same time, and I did not know about this, the Federal Communications Commission is looking at Disney, Comcast and other left wings media organizations and they're using the DEI stuff. Remember, the president signed an order saying anybody dealing with the federal government cannot practice diversity, equity and inclusion. And if you do, you can't deal with the federal government at all. That's the law. Executive order. Well, now Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, says he's looking at Disney and Comcast and Verizon as violators of this executive order. Whoa. Now, I knew this was going to happen because I had an extensive 90 minute conversation with Donald Trump on January 2nd about the media. I can't impart everything that went on. It was a private dinner. But we talked at length. And he asks me questions and I answer him honestly because I know all of these people. As I told you yesterday, I know everybody at pbs. I know who they are. I know how they operate. All right? I've been in this business 50 years. I can't believe it, but it's true. I'm the last man standing from my class of journalists. The last one, Brit Hume, maybe he's a little bit more than me, so I shouldn't say the last one Hume is there anyway. And I told President Trump, I answered his questions honestly and I told him about the culture of Disney, the culture of Comcast, the culture of pbs. Now, what do I mean by that? If you work for these organizations, you must toe their line or you are not going to prosper. I worked at CBS under Dan Rather. I worked at ABC under Peter Jennings. I know this. Now, those cultures have changed. Jennings is a tough Guy, social liberal, but he didn't want any ideology in reporting. He's very disciplined, very fair. Rather not so much. Rather was a committed liberal and he did inject his politics into the CBS presentation, which drove Walter Cronkite crazy because remember, Rather took over from Cronkite. Cronkite was a liberal too, but he didn't like that. I know all this. I was there. So then the culture of Disney and the culture of Comcast, NBC went even further left when I started the O'Reilly Factor because Fox News was so successful in presenting a traditional point of view to the American public. The others went, well, we don't believe in traditional points of view. We love liberalism. So let's double, triple, quadruple down on our liberalism. And that's what they did. I would never get hired today by Disney or Comcast even though I could make them tons of money. They wouldn't hire me. They won't even put me on CBS Sunday MORNING show to talk about my books, which are the best selling nonfiction books in the world. And I called out Jane Pauley, but Jayne Pauly is part of that culture. You cannot prosper inside these major media corporations unless you are a left winger. And I'll tell you, you can't prosper inside of FOX News unless you're a traditional conservative. But it's not quite as onerous at Fox. They need outside and there are a few voices on the left there and they're usually responsible voices, in my opinion or any nuts down there. So anyway, Trump knows he's never going to get a fair cut from Disney or Comcast ever. They're always going to try to hurt him. So he says, okay, you won't play that game. FCC is going to look at you now. And that's what's happening now if you disagree with my analysis or [e-mail] name in town. But what I've told you is absolutely the truth. It's all to do with the corporate culture. All right. And here's an interesting footnote to this. Pew put out a poll on whether tax money should go to NPR, PBS. All right. More than 9,000Americans polled. Question is, would you stop federal government funding for NPR and PBS? So stop it. 24% continue the funding. 43% no, don't know. 33%. 33% they don't know what NPR and PBS is. I don't know. No, because NPR and PBS are in business to promote liberalism. Why should I, if I'm not a liberal, pay for that. You're forcing me to pay for that with my tax money. No, that's not democracy. Smart life. Okay, so the no spin news billo reilly.com Our whole independent news operation is just about 8 years old. I can't believe that time went so fast. We are the most successful independent news agency in the world, and that takes in profits. It takes in millions of views, whatever. There's nobody close to us. Now, some of these podcasts, they get a lot of attention, but they're podcasts, they're like, yeah, sit around in their sweatshirts and this is a news organization, all right? We abide by the journalistic tenants. And we are. There's nobody that comes close to us. And we're all over the world now on YouTube and things like that. Anyway, if you are a member, a concierge or premium member of billoriley.com you get special privileges, okay, including discounts on all our stuff if you. And you get a free book when you sign up. So if you get the free book and you buy two things throughout the year to give as gifts, you make your membership fee back. That's the way I set it up so you really get it free. We have a 90% retention rate. Nobody in the business says that on any product. 90% of people who sign up for concierge and premium membership resign. Re up. Nobody has that. No car, no anything. Then the reason is because we're unique. We give you information no one else does. And we're honest, authentic. So why am I telling you this? Smart life. You're smart to be with us. Why? Because I'm giving you information that's going to help you and your family. And I'm not pulling anything back. I'm not censoring anything. I'm telling you what's going on in this country, in the world. In order to prosper, you need to know these things, particularly with the economy. So I'm right on this tariff business. I am watching everything that happens so I can tell you what's likely to happen in the grocery store, at the gas pump, things like that. So that's why we have a 90% retention rate. Smart Life, you're in good shape if you are with us and if you're a generous person, which, you know, smart life generosity kind of go together. Give a, give a premium reconciliation member to somebody as a gift. You're helping them. You're making their life better. You're enhancing their lives. So that's our pitch. Eight years into this experiment, you know, when I left Fox News I took five people with me from FNC in various capacities and they are still core of what we do here because I train them and this and that and that's why we're where we are. Michelle Obama has a hydration drink with Stephen Curry, the basketball player. It's called Pleas Something something P L E Z I Please Hydration and it has more potassium, half the sugar left. Sodium, Michelle says comes in three flavors and it's 229 a bottle. Whoa, whoa. That's a lot for an energy drink. But it doesn't have the sugar so I'm happy. No added artificial sweeteners and pleasing means fun and creole. What's it please? I don't know what it is, but the interesting part of the story is that Michelle Obama is a capitalist to the nth degree. Sorry about the cliche. Three mansions. I mean big nice mansions. And a fourth working in Chicago on the library front. And now she got a hydration drink. This is not Bernie Sanders here. This is. Come on. So I thought you would like to know Stephen Curry is a really good basketball player. Golden State. They're in business together. I might try it, but boy, 229 a bottle. So here is the final thought of the day. The 3American show on Sunday at 3pm we're going to do a bunch of things there. It's not just the live tour. I'm shooting it for television now. What does that mean? I'm shooting a pilot because I believe this concept is really, really strong. And we're going to see if somebody wants to stream it based upon the show. It's number one. Number two, we are going to show you some of the clips on Monday. Not a lot because we want you to come to the show but there will be a pre game huddle with Stephen A. Smith, Chris Cuomo and me. We're going to shoot that and the audience would even see that. But you will on Monday and we're going to lay out what we're going to do. We're going to have that. So it's a special situation and I think what I'm going to show you on Monday is the Q and A with the audience. That should really be wild. So you have three separate guys with three separate philosophies and the questions that are going to come in. And I'm kind of the moderator here. It's my production company that's doing this. So I'm going to show you a little bit about that and see the flavor of it and how it goes. The Guys are primed. They say they're bringing their A games. I said above all, we want to have fun. We're going to have a lot of good information, but it's going to be a fun, enjoyable, entertaining program. We're going to do it and best case scenario is everybody has a blast at Sunday at 3 on Long island and then we take the tape and somebody buys it. So we do this on a kind of semi regular basis for the world because the world needs non choir stuff. What drives me crazy, and I've said it before, I'm sorry to be redundant, is when I was working at Fox the Factor, I looked for the best guess I could get that opposed my point of view. My orders to the my producers were find the smartest person who disagrees with me and let's see the debate and then people can decide which argument is stronger. We still do that to this day here. That's God. It's the choir. Every guest agrees with the host no matter what channel it is. This is very, very little. Now CNN has ejected this guy Jennings into their proceedings. He pretty good, but he's outnumbered five six to one and by the time you get to him everybody's like, oh geez. And that is really boring to me. That's why I don't watch a lot of news, television news or the networks or the cable. It's dull, it's predictable. We are not this show will not be predict. I don't know what's going to happen on Sunday at 3. Go to BillO Reilly.com if you want to see us. We released 15 VIPs so you could meet the three of us after the show. Why anyone would want to do that? Beyond me. But all the VIPs sold out real fast. So you get a picture and you know, we chat a bit. So anyway, this is going to be an interesting weekend for moi, which I think is French for me. Thank you for watching the no Spin news and listening on our radio stations. We'll see you Monday.