Loading summary
A
A Carlos no le gusta larena por quesepega todo cuando gabi organizombia pare lembito el doanir asica gregono telcon alberca panoramica lalista y pasaro nuna semana ne lagua vives paratener las cosas a tu gusto. Vivimos con alberca Cascada, Tina, Yuna, regader and creible expedia. Vivimos paraviajar.
B
Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the latest edition of Looking out for you. Let's get started. So Kamala Harris goes on Colbert on Friday night. Okay. And the stats are unbelievable for Colbert. I mean this is incredible. Colbert, according to Newsbusters, which is conservative but pretty accurate, has hosted 177 left wing guests. And one was not a liberal. That was the congressman from Wyoming, ex Congressman Cheney, who hates Trump. Okay, Liz Cheney. And that's it. So if you are not a fervent liberal, you can't get on Colbert. And he openly rooted for Kamala Harris to be president. And he was the only one of the late night shows. Kimmel, Myers, Fallon, Colbert, Daily Show. 99% of all the guests so far this year have been liberal. Is that unbelievable? Really? Think about it. So it's like censorship. It's a blackout of any opposing points of view. Okay, so Kamala shows up and she's not going to run for governor of California. I was wrong. I thought she would. A relatively young woman. I don't know why she's hanging it up, but she's not. And she goes on there and she says some pretty interesting things. Roll the tape. I know you're not here to say.
A
I told you so.
B
But would you like to?
A
But let me, let me just say this. You are correct that I did predict a lot of it. But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation. I didn't predict that people would roll.
B
Over for this president.
A
I didn't see that. I didn't see that coming. And perhaps it's naive of me, someone who has seen a lot that most people haven't seen. But I believed that on some level, you know, there are many, there should be many who consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy, who just capitulated. And I didn't see that coming.
B
So I'm going, what is she talking about? I don't know. My rights in the last six months haven't been violated. Have yours? And if they have, I want to know about it bill@billoriley.com name in town bill@billorilly.com so what is she talking about? The guardians of freedom or the Constitution? I don't know. Now, a decent interviewer would have said, well, can you give me an example of something you're very surprised at, Madam Vice president? That's Journalism 101. Colbert and then the seals and the audio. Okay, yeah, I'm being a little mean to Colbert and the seals in the audience, but they deserve it because when you have somebody like that Harris, who's basically saying, hey, Trump is violating all of our rights and he's dismantling the Constitution. Okay, give me some examples of that, can you? I don't think she could. Kamala Harris. And then she went on to say what a great job Joe Biden did. So if you read my book, Confronting the President, you know that I believe that Biden's the second worst president in the history of the republic. And not everybody agrees with me. Some people think he's the first worst, but he's not James Buchanan, he's got that and he'll never give it up. So if you're interested, you read the book, you'll see he was the president before Lincoln, the Civil War and all that. But anyway, so you have a woman there sitting on a couch with Colbert who's an ardent liberal, and he uses his so called comedy show, or variety show, whatever you want to call it, to promote the Democratic Party and liberal cause. That's what Colbert does and that's why he's not successful. That's why the show loses a lot of money and that's why CBS canceled. CBS didn't cancel it because Donald Trump didn't like it. They cancel it and say, is it worth it? Okay, is it worth it? Keep the guy on. He's blacking out all opposing points of view and he's losing. He didn't lose 40. That was the press number, about 20, 25 million. They're losing over there. But that's a lot of jack at CBS late night. And they can make it up by expanding newscasts or using reruns or what. They can make money. Okay, but let's get back to Harris, because Harris, she got 75, 76 million votes to be president in this country. But I've always said I had never, all the time that I followed her and analyzed her, it was all generalities and never, hey, at Trump, that SOB is doing this, all right? And this is going to lead to that. And this is not what our founding fathers had intended, you know, a little surgery. She's got writers, she's got people to do it, never does it. And to think that Biden, with all of the massive problems that he created, not didn't solve, created the border problem. That was an executive order that opened that border. Okay? He surrendered in Afghanistan. He did not consult with Congress about that. Billions of dollars worth of weaponry went to the Taliban. Are you kidding me? He did that. And I could go on and on. In fact, I wrote a column called A Cup of Joe on Billoriely.com that runs down all the constitutional violations that the Biden Harris administration participated in. Now, I'm an open minded guy. Some people don't believe that, but it's true. If you see something that Donald Trump has done to threaten our freedoms and our Constitution, please let me know again, Bill, at billorolly.com and I'll lose it. I'll read it. And if you don't want your name out there, I won't put it out there. But I'm very interested in that. So Trump is basically a guy who is trying to run the country from a transactional point of view. That's what he's trying to do. He doesn't care about ideology. He's not Rush Limbaugh. He's not. He's not even a Republican. My God, he was a Democrat until he switched because he knew that was the pathway in, because his appeal was going to be to people who were traditional. He doesn't like the woke stuff. He doesn't want the dei, doesn't want all this indoctrination. And now he hates the left. He didn't hate the left in 16. Remember I had the first interview with Trump when he announced being president he was going to run. I had the first one, okay? He was more concentrating on his opponents, Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, than he was on the left wing. It wasn't even his mind. But they attacked him so savagely. The left wing, now he hates him. Now it's personal. Even Hillary Clinton, after he defeated Hillary Clinton, he had a very nice phone call with her and very complimentary. And it wasn't what it turned out to be. Now that Hillary Clinton, the evidence is mounting that she was behind that whole phony Russian collusion thing. But people think that she's going to get charged and Obama's going to get charged. All this long way away from that possible. And I'll get into that more down the road when more evidence surfaces. But you can't do Hearsay. And you can't do opinion when you present indictments in front of a grand jury. Federal grand jury wants proof. They want to see the evidence. Not you think or you know. Because Hillary Clinton could say, I don't know anything about it. My staff did it. I don't know. So, I mean, I'm just giving you the devil's advocate here that a lot of conservatives could really, oh, we're gonna get Hillary. We're gonna get Barack Obama. Oh, wait a minute. Whistleblower comes out, whole different ball game. But you need somebody like that. But anyway, getting back to Kamala Harris, you know, I have nothing against a woman. I thank God she's not President of the United States is bad as some people think Donald Trump is. Trump is really trying to change the economy in this country, and he's handled Iran well. I think he's going to get a deal with China. All right, Kamala Harris, I had zero confidence because she could never, ever get specific about anything. So this is interesting. I talked on Katz and Cosby this afternoon about Mamdani, and, you know, I'm a little tired of Mandami. You probably are, too. And I don't think he's going to be the next mayor, but I could be wrong. I think things are going to happen. But Elizabeth Warren rolls into town from Boston to help Mandani, and I'm going, how does that help? How? Elizabeth Warren, the senator, is simpatico socialist. I think they're communists myself. But, you know, that sounds like Barry Goldwater, if you remember him, or McCarthy or one of those. I think they're communists because I don't think there's any limits on a part of man. Donnie and Elizabeth Warren, on what they would take away from me because I am affluent, and they would come in and try to take everything that I have after I die, and while I'm alive, just brutalize me through taxation, wealth tax, on and on and on. That's a seizure of private property, and that's what communism is. Communists seize private property. Socialists, they don't seize private property, but they want to run the economy, so there's no private marketplace. They tell the corporations and companies, this is what you will do. And they would tell the American people, this is how much money you can have, and we're taking the rest of it. That's socialism. The only line is that the socialists won't force, okay, people to give up property. So when Castro took over in 1959 and the anniversary of is this week, his goons just came in and said, you can't own a house. I'm taking your house, taking your business, taking your car, taking everything you have. That's communism. That's what Stalin did. That's what they did in all the communist countries. No private property. McGovern, Mamdani, these people, McGovern, Warren, Sanders. No, we're not going to do that. But we'll try to get you any way we can get you, okay? That's the difference. So Warren rolls into town, and I guess Mamdani thinks she's going to help him. With whom? The far, far left Socialists already support him. Is Elizabeth Warren going to make anybody who's not a crazy loon on the left look at Mandani as a legitimate mayoral candidate? No, she's not. She's not the type of person that persuades anybody. She's in stone far left. And he already has the far left. The people who say, hey, you know, New York's too expensive. So rather than moving someplace else or working my way up, taking a studio apartment and making some money, and then I get a one bedroom or a three bedroom, whatever it may be. I want a government. Give it to me. I want a free subway tail. I want a free bus ride. I want, I want, I want, I want, I want. All right, There's a bunch of people like that, Millions of people like that. That's the basis for to be socialist. Give me, give me, give me, give me, give me. Because I don't want to work for it. I don't want to compete, and I can't because my father was mad at me or I had a terrible upbringing, which is true. But how many people have overcome that? My God, look at Billy Joel. Did he get a good upbringing? No. Barack Obama. Happy birthday, Mr. President. Terrible upbringing. Raised by his grandparents, no father. Come on, it's no excuse. You gotta tough it out, overcome it. But a lot of people don't want to because it's hard. Believe me, coming out of Levittown with absolutely no money whatsoever. It was hard to work myself up, but I paid the price. But millions are not willing to do that. And they want mam. Donnie and Elizabeth Warren to give them stuff. That's what this is all about. But I don't think Warren does him any good at all. Some good news for Mayor Adams and for the people living in New York City. So shootings are down. Police Commissioner Tisch says that in the first seven months of this year, NYC recorded the lowest number of shooting incidents and shooting victims in history. She also announced that major crime continues to decline citywide. That means burglaries are down. Felony assaults, robbery, grand larceny. So Adams is struggling in the mayoral polls in advance of the election next November, and this is good news for him. So you got to be fair about it. I don't think Mayor Adams has solved many problems in his three and a half years in office, but this is a good report. The gross incidence of shootings are still high, but this is the largest city in the country. So the first seven months, 2025, he had 412 shooting incidents. Okay. And 489 shooting victims. You know, it's a lot people getting gunned down, not at the rate that it used to be. When the crack wars and I covered those in the 1990s were going down. But it's still a dangerous city. You gotta be careful. So why? Well, I did some investigating for you, my audience at WABC and around the country. What has happened is Commissioner Tisch, who's very good, by the way. And whoever's elected mayor ought to keep her because she knows what she's doing. The police are very quietly, because of the far left pressure, movement have flooded the zones where most of the gangs operate. And the gangs are armed. These are drug gangs. Okay? So Tish has put NYPD detectives and plain clothes and officers in uniform in public housing areas, in certain subways, in violent crime areas like the Bronx, like Bed Stuy, places like that. Okay? And that is the key to it. If you have a police presence on the streets, the gangbangers can see the cops. They're less likely to shoot you or anybody else. So far this year, 347 gang members and associates have been arrested on gun charges and 236 illegal guns seized. Now, most of those people will not be prosecuted because that's the flaw in New York City. And New York state's justices, the DA's are largely liberal. They don't care about violence on the street. They don't want minority criminals in particular to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I'm sorry, but it's true. I mean, if you're offended by me saying that, then it's your problem, not mine. It's absolutely true. And what's going on? So I did, as I said, some research into this. What the NYPD has done is it has divided the city into 72 deployment zones and 59 communities are a part of this. And they have put an extra 2,000 cops in those deployment zones. Those are the numbers. So that's the way you drive down violent crime. Now, the way you really eliminate it is stop and frisk. But that's not happening in New York State because the legislature and city council says, well, the cops are stopping mostly minorities to frisk them. And that's true. But the reason they're doing it is most of the crime victims, including the shooting victims, are minorities. Do you see the correlation? Hello? Anyway, I'm going to congratulate Commissioner Tisch and Mayor Adams on this report. And I don't know whether the mayor will get any traction on it. You know, there's a lot of emotion in this mayoral election coming up. It's a real fight on a lot of different fronts. But that now is a fact. I was on Hannity today on your radio program, and he's going, why don't you move out of New York? Why don't you move out of New York? Why don't you move out of New York? Because Hannity moved from Long island where he was born and raised, to Palm Beach. Palm beach is a nice place, but for five months out of the year, it's an inferno. And I'm Irish, and he's Irish too, but he kind of likes the heat. He tells me, I just can't take it. I mean, it's like, oh, oh, oh. If it goes over 85, I get hives. You know, so climate wise, Texas, because I lived in Texas for two years, I lived in Florida for two years. I know what it is, and I very uncomfortable in that climate. But I understand the financial climate in both of those states a lot better than it is in New York. But New York has other things that Texas and Florida does not have. Big, vibrant culture, sports all over the place, old time friends, family, all that. And that's why I don't move, because I got urchins here and I got three corporations and it's not really worth me to pick up now. Now, if Albany passes a wealth tax, if they try to confiscate my property, I will move, all right? And so will millions of other New Yorkers. I mean, that's the end. So we're at a crossroads now. In New York state, we've got an ultra progressive legislature. In Albany, we've got a hapless governor. H A P L E S S Hapless. Okay? We have an out of control city in a sense of social disorder, even though the crime is coming down. And we did a commentary last night on that. We applaud the police commissioner and Mayor Adams. Good job. But it's still social disorder everywhere. City's filthy. Taxes are the highest in the nation. So this is a challenging place to live. We are at a crossroads. So if. Ma'. Am. Donnie, and I'm sure you're sick about hearing him. I am. If he wins, then you're going to have hundreds of thousands of affluent New Yorkers leave the state. And I would say hundreds of thousands of jobs will leave, too, and that'll cause a collapse of the New York State economy because we're already in big debt and the tax base will flee. People who will come in are not affluent people, generally speaking, and everything will go to hell. That's what's going to happen. And it doesn't take a swami or Nostradamus to predict will. And the people who vote for Mandani, as I have pointed out time and time again, want the destruction of the system. They hate the country and the state and the city. They want it destroyed. So what will happen in November? I don't know. If Cuomo or Adams drop out one of them, then the Democrats will win with the guy who stays in. But to split the vote, maybe that's enough for Mamdani to squeak in. And Curtis looks like he's got 30, 35%. That's a pretty good number. But I don't know if it's going to be enough. And I don't even know if that number is legit. But Curtis is working his butt off. I think he's going to raise some money. So he's a factor you can't discount. But if Mandami does get elected, look out below, as they say. And again, I'm not hysterical. You know me, I'm not. I'm just Paul Revere. Here I am warning everyone what will happen, because the degeneration of New York City. Think about if you're a certain age, what was going on in Giuliani to now. My God. And it's all progressive governance. And Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo sold us all out. He sold every New Yorker out. Now, did he learn his lesson? I don't know. I don't know. You know, they all have tremendous deficits, but none of them have deficits close to Mamdani, who's a communist. So there is my analysis. You can spread it around. I hope you do. Might get down to the crazy people who think Mandami is going to improve things, which he will not. So, as everybody knows, the media has basically destroyed itself trying to destroy Donald Trump. So listen to that sentence again. The media has pretty much destroyed itself by trying to destroy Donald Trump. They overdid it. Overdid it and lost credibility. Not only would MAGA people, but with regular folks who aren't really ideologically inclined, they know the fix is in. And now there's a pullback. It started with Stephen Colbert getting the ax, and then there's rumbling it's about Disney and the View, CBS morning program, Gayle King, a lot of change coming on. But the one company corporation that is really dug in to the progressive agenda is NBC, the Peacock Network. Very interesting. When Brokaw was there, I never worked for NBC. I worked for ABC and cbs, as you may know, but I never worked for NBC. But when I would go over to there to do Leno or the Today show or, you know, those guys, there was never a problem. There was never a problem. I knew that the culture was left, but it didn't. They weren't crazy people. And then MSNBC started and they were kind of crazy. Not in the beginning. The first few years of msnbc, they were just basically a news agency, lean left, but it wasn't insane. But then they became, you know, this far left outfit. Now most of the corporations, you know, they fear Donald Trump because he can, you know, this whole CBS sale to Skydance that hinges on Trump's, okay, it's going to happen in October. CBS is gone and Skydance is going to take it over. It'll still be cbs, but all of those people are going to get fired or resign or whatever. A totally new network, okay? NBC, they're going to stay the same. Now, let me give you some backup for that. Okay? So the White House correspondent for NBC News is Monica Alba, okay? And she is reporting on August 4th about the phony Russian collusion investigation. Roll the tape.
A
But it really does bear repeating. This is looking into something for which there is no evidence to back it up. And it's really, it seems, a politically motivated move to keep the focus on one of the President's clear political foes and talk about basically anything else.
B
Though, according to Monica, there is no evidence whatsoever, not a scintilla, a shred, that there was anything untoward or illegal in pushing a phony story that said that Donald Trump's campaign was working with Putin to get him elected. No evidence at all. Monica Alba, okay, maybe she has superpowers, but wouldn't you like at least Ms. Alba to see what the Justice Department is going to put forth, what the House Oversight Committee is going to throw out there? We like to just see it. No evidence at all. Just A deflection. I mean, if I had ever said anything like that 30 years ago and I was reporting as a correspondent for abc, I mean, I would say, hey, Bill, there's the door. You got to back up what you say. Secondly, we all know Rachel Maddow. I kind of admire Ms. Maddow for just working her way up, building her, you know, person, progressive cred into a very lucrative contract. I mean, come on, that's what capitalism's all about. But she's a little bit hysterical, wouldn't you say? NBC loves her bullet take.
A
This is America. No kings, yes queens. Right, like that. This is just us. It's who we are. And this is how we feel about you.
B
I mean, this is just.
A
This is Joplin, Missouri. This is Louisville, Kentucky, where thousands of people turned out. This is McHenry, Illinois. This is High Point, North Carolina. It is literally everywhere in this country. Americans in surprising numbers, in surprising places, turning out again and again and again and again to say, no, nope, we are not doing this. You are not taking over our country and turning us into a dictatorship. You are not going to be a king.
B
Well, number one, the numbers weren't surprising. They were low. Number two, many of the protesters against Donald Trump in June were paid. We know that their organizations got these people out. They bussed them there. They made the signs. Rachel just kind of missed all that. Oh, this isn't organic. American people rising up is a no Fourth Reich. All right, now, she's entitled to her opinion. Okay? I made a make a nice living throwing my opinion out there. I can't be a hypocrite. She's entitled to it, but this is what NBC does. There is no counter on MSNBC to Rachel Maddow, no counter to Monica Alba and the entire NBC News organization. No one. Does that seem fair to you? Well, NBC is not going to make any adjustments. I don't think they will. Nothing's on the board. I think there's going to be big trouble at Disney, abc. And why is there going to be big trouble? Well, for. Because of people like George Stephanopoulos. Go. You've endorsed Donald Trump for president. Donald Trump has been found liable for rape by a jury. Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of that rape by a jury. It's been affirmed by a judge. No. So Stephanopoulos and Disney had to pay $16 million to Trump for falsifying what really happened in that E. Jean Carroll case, which is a fiasco from the very beginning. Now, again, I don't mind Stephanopoulos, if he wants to pay. And out of his pocket, I understand, was more than a million dollars. Georgie had to write the check. If you want to be that inflammatory and get sued and have to settle, it's up to you. But Disney, this is their main guy. Okay, where's the counter? There is no counter. And finally, cbs. I mean, it's over at cbs, as I just explained. But I think it's worth reviewing how it got to critical mass. And it got to critical mass on 60 minutes, once the crown jewel of American television journalism. So the main guy on 60 Minutes is now Scott Pelley. He is a reporter, a correspondent, not an analyst. Roll him. But in this moment, this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack. And insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes, and into our private thoughts. The fear to speak in America. If our government is, in Lincoln's phrase, of the people, by the people, for the people, then why are we afraid to speak? I'm not afraid to speak. Scott's not afraid to speak, is he? No. He wails on how bad the Trump administration is at Wake forest University on May 19. He didn't look scared to me. I'm not afraid to speak. How I make my living. Do I look afraid? So this is all what they call hyperbola. So they hate Trump so much. The Fourth Reich is coming. Hitler, oh, no, we can't speak. Oh, no, Gestapo coming for us. It's just a joke. Overstatement. And for the reporters to be doing that, come on. That's a violation of every journalistic tenet. Everyone. Every single one. ABC fired a guy for saying that Trump and Stephen Miller, the top White House advisor, were haters. They fired him. Okay, so it's coming around now. But not NBC. They are entrenched. Thank you for listening to Looking out for you. Remember to subscribe to my podcast feed. Also, consider becoming a Billorilly.com Premium Member. It will enhance your life. Sign up@billorilly.com membership. Get access to full episodes of the no Spin News.
Podcast Summary: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis – "Looking Out For You" (August 10, 2025)
In the August 10, 2025 episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly delves into a range of pressing political and social issues, offering his perspectives on media bias, political figures, and law enforcement in New York City. The episode is structured into several key segments, each highlighting O’Reilly's critical viewpoints and notable statements.
Timestamp: [00:33] – [02:14]
Bill O’Reilly begins by critiquing Stephen Colbert’s show, highlighting what he perceives as a significant liberal bias. He asserts that Colbert has predominantly hosted left-leaning guests, limiting diverse viewpoints.
Bill O’Reilly: "Colbert, according to Newsbusters, which is conservative but pretty accurate, has hosted 177 left wing guests. And one was not a liberal… if you are not a fervent liberal, you can't get on Colbert."
He expresses concern over the lack of conservative representation, suggesting that this imbalance amounts to a form of censorship.
Timestamp: [02:14] – [05:00]
O’Reilly discusses Vice President Kamala Harris's appearance on Colbert’s show, expressing skepticism about her political future and effectiveness.
Bill O’Reilly: "Kamala Harris… has writers, she's got people to do it, never does it. And to think that Biden, with all of the massive problems that he created…"
He critiques Harris's inability to provide specific examples when accusing President Trump of constitutional violations, questioning her credibility and political strategy.
Timestamp: [05:00] – [15:00]
O’Reilly offers a harsh assessment of President Joe Biden, labeling him as one of the "worst presidents in the history of the republic." He accuses the administration of mishandling the border crisis and the withdrawal from Afghanistan, citing these actions as evidence of constitutional violations.
Bill O’Reilly: "Biden's the second worst president in the history of the republic… He surrendered in Afghanistan. He did not consult with Congress about that."
He references his book, Confronting the President, for a detailed analysis of his criticisms.
Timestamp: [15:00] – [25:00]
Shifting focus to New York City, O’Reilly praises Police Commissioner Richardson Tish for successfully reducing violent crime through increased police presence in high-risk areas.
Bill O’Reilly: "Commissioner Tisch… has put NYPD detectives and plain clothes officers in public housing areas… and that's the key to it."
He highlights the decline in shootings and other violent crimes, attributing these improvements to strategic law enforcement measures despite ongoing social disorder and high taxes.
Timestamp: [25:00] – [35:00]
O’Reilly provides his outlook on upcoming political elections, particularly focusing on New York City's mayoral race. He warns of potential economic downturns if progressive candidates like Mandani win, predicting mass exodus of affluent residents and job losses.
Bill O’Reilly: "If Mandani does get elected, look out below… the degeneration of New York City."
He also critiques media outlets, accusing them of attempting to undermine Donald Trump and expressing confidence that media credibility is diminishing.
Timestamp: [35:00] – [40:00]
In the final segment, O’Reilly scrutinizes major media corporations, particularly NBC and CBS, for their perceived liberal agendas. He cites instances like Scott Pelley's reporting and the Monica Alba interview on the Russia investigation as evidence of biased journalism.
Bill O’Reilly: "NBC loves Rachel Maddow's bullet take… there is no counter on MSNBC to Rachel Maddow."
He emphasizes the lack of balanced reporting and anticipates significant changes within media organizations as a result of ongoing political pressures.
Throughout the episode, Bill O’Reilly maintains a critical stance on liberal politics, mainstream media, and current administration policies. His analysis reflects deep concerns about media bias, governance, and societal trends, aiming to inform and caution his audience about the directions in which he believes the country is heading.
For more in-depth analysis and additional episodes, listeners are encouraged to visit BillOReilly.com.