Loading summary
A
Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform? Well, now you can trade all in one place on Robinhood. That means you can trade individual stocks and ETFs and also buy and sell crypto using seriously powerful and intuitive tools at one of the lowest costs on average without needing to manage multiple apps. Robinhood makes withdrawing and depositing crypto seamless. Send crypto to your Robinhood account or send crypto from your Robinhood account to other wallets without deposit or withdrawal fees from Robinhood. Trade all in one place. Get started now on Robinhood Trading. Crypto involves significant risk. Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto llc. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Crypto held through Robinhood crypto is not FDIC insured or SIPC Protected network fees may apply to crypto transfers. Crypto transfers may not be available to all customers. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal securities Trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC member sipc, a registered broker dealer foreign.
B
Here. Welcome to the latest edition of Looking out for you. Let's get started. Wish I had better news to analyze, but I don't. And I have to deal with this Charlie Kirk situation in the sense of what is happening in the wake of his assassination. The justice system will take care of the alleged assassin. I say alleged because due process is certainly afforded to every person in this country. But he's guilty. He did it. And I think the state of Utah will execute him eventually. It'll take forever, but I think they will. And even if they don't, he's never going to get out of prison. But the reaction is worth stairstepping because it's troubling. It's troubling. Now, most of us live in kind of a bubble. I'm an exception to that. I can't live in the bubble. I've got to go and see what everybody's doing and saying. But many, many Americans, I think the majority are much more comfortable with people who agree with them about everything. Or the younger people, they go into the websites and where they whatever activity they like is available, whatever dialogue they like is available. And so they create. You create this bubble around you, okay? And that's why I wrote my new book, Confronting Evil, to burst that bubble. And I think I'll be partially successful in doing that thanks to what's going on in the USA after Mr. Kirk's tragic assassination. Just just as a footnote, here Evil always spreads unless confronted, unless you fight back. So this guy in Utah, not only does he kill Charlie Kirk, but he destroys Kirk's family. Okay, the young widow and two little kids. But he destroyed his own family also. This is what evil does, it spreads. So the assassins, mother and father and two brothers never be the same, Never. They live in a small community, St. George, Utah. I've been there. Very beautiful, near the Grand Canyon. But those people, you know, just put yourself in their shoes. President Trump mentioned that today that the family unit is a traditional family. They can't come back from this and it's not like they're not going to be able to live, but their whole lives taking a dramatic turn for the worse. So this is what evil does. It just spreads its tentacles out. Now, I'm not an ideological guy. I mean, I know the left wing press is trying to brand me that for the last 30 years, but I'm not. I'm a problem solver. I'm a registered independent. I listen to both sides and I evaluate what I believe is best for the country on a problem solving basis. So I'm privy to what most people are saying. My staff is instructed to send me a wide array of opinion and analysis. Now, there is a guy at Harvard, and you may know that I have a master's degree from that school, Lawrence Tribe, who is a very anti Trump liberal law professor, but he's been at Harvard forever. He's got tenure there and he's, you know, actively involved in a discourse. So when this terrible thing happened to Charlie Kirk, he said on social media, which is incredible for a Harvard law professor to put out there, quote, Kirk's apparent assassin seems to have been ultra maga exploding the GOP MAGA attempt to pin the blame for this tragedy on liberals. Now this is a Harvard law professor, of course, that turned out to be 100% inaccurate. Wrong. And then he deletes. Okay, now that just is disturbing. Everybody knows, everybody who's in the business, journalism, law or any of that, that you wait until the facts emerge. You don't do this, you don't take stuff from the Internet. You don't. That's knee jerk stupidity. But Tribe won't pay a price for that because Tribe's tribe wanted to believe that and that's why I put it out there. So he did apologize, but it was gibberish. Okay, it's gibberish. But that just, that's at the highest level. Now I'm not going down to the Hollywood stars who don't know anything or the sports people or anything like that. Not even going, I'm going to the highest level law professor, esteemed Harvard. Now, Stephen King, this guy is a very, very ardent liberal. Nothing wrong with that, okay? He's a brilliant writer. He's made a bloody fortune on the horror novels. Capitalism has been very good to Stephen King, but he is way out there on the left flank again, perfect right, as an American to do that. So he inserts himself into this by saying that Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gay people. It's not true. Now, King picked it up from some website or something, and then in. King apologized, okay? After he was called out and called names and. And all that. So Kings should know better, right? But King and tribe have one thing in common. They live in this ideological bubble. This is where they live. This is where they feel comfortable with other far left people, and they want to feed that monster. Now, King, he doesn't need the money anymore. He's so wealthy, but he's hurt himself dramatically among the American people. Even just moderate liberals, no guy gets killed. 50 family devastated. And you're saying that he wanted to stone gays when it's not true. Nobody's going to support that except the real loons, okay? Where they'll accept anything that'll make the other slide look bad. Finally, there's a guy this is crazy, named Gerald Bourquet, who I never heard of, but he works for the NBA in Phoenix, Arizona. He writes about the Suns and he's got a podcast, the Phoenix Suns NBA team. Okay? Now, he threw out the most vile stuff in the world. I'm going to just give you one quote. This is Gerald Burkett. If you're saddened by today's political violence, that's the murder of Mr. Kirk. Horrified by the video, repulsed by my response, ask yourself why your reaction was different when it came to school shootings and mass deportations or hundreds of videos of horrific murders in Gaza, which Kirk cheered on. Okay? Kirk did not cheer on. And murders in Gaza, you know, you'd have to be specific about that in order to be taken seriously. But the point is that Kirk didn't cheer them on, just as he didn't advocate for stoning homosexuals. Now, this guy Burkett, another bubble person, he didn't apologize. The Phoenix Suns fired him. The NBA fired him. It had to be fired. You can't do that, you know, particularly right after somebody loses his or her life. Can't be justifying it. That's what this is all about. The tribe and. And this guy. And you Know, it's all about justifying a violent murder. Now, Stephen King, I'd say he was the worst of the three here with the stoning of the gays. The other guy just looks like a nut. Burkett and Tribe is, you know, what are you going to do? But the point is that anybody trafficking in this kind of stuff who is celebrating the assassination of a fellow human being, unless that person is Hitler or Stalin or Mao, you know, mass. Mass murderer, then you say, yeah, good. Glad we got them. Right. Okay. But celebrating the murder of a 31 year old with a family, I think they're emotionally ill. That's just my opinion. But I don't know anybody like that. Do you know anybody like that? I know a lot of people with a lot of political beliefs. I don't know anybody who would say something like that. Now, I have pretty high standards about who I hang with. If I think that you're a nut, Zionara, so that cuts down on the lunatic fringe in my life big time. But I. I'll tell you what, I'm with thousands of people. I don't know one person who would do that, celebrate an assassination like that. I'm getting the feeling that politics is hurtling out of control in the usa. I was surprised, and I bet you were too, somewhat, that Governor Kathy Hochul endorsed Zoran Mam Adani. I think that was a terrible move on the part of Governor Hochul if she wants to get reelected in November 2026. But I could be wrong because New York is a very strange state right now. It's drifting radical left in the city. But the rest of the state, I don't think that's what's happening. New poll in Nassau county says that residents where I am, where I live, don't like Hochul and they don't like Mandani and they don't want any part of them anyway. A statement came out given to the New York Times September 14, and here's what Kathy Hochul had to say. Quote, tonight I am endorsing Assemblyman Zorhan Mamdani. In the past few months, I've had frank conversations with him. We've had our disagreements, but in our conversations, I heard a leader shares my commitment to a New York where children can grow up safe in their neighborhoods and where opportunity is within reach for every family. I heard a leader who is focused on making New York City affordable, a goal I enthusiastically support, unquote. Well, this is a loopy statement. It's ridiculous to think that, Ma', am, Donnie wants to have children grow up safe when he doesn't want to enforce the law. He's quite clear on that. He wants to let as many criminals out of jail as possible, and he wants to take $1 billion out of the NYPD budget. Well, how, Governor Hochul, is that going to keep the children safe? Madam, it's not even. You have to understand that. So I don't have any personal beef against Hochul. I've spoken to a few times. We had very civil conversations. But I'm starting to think she's just not smart enough to run anything. When you say you want to keep children safe in the face of a man, Donnie, who is going to basically create unbelievable, violent chaos on the streets of New York, that's either a lie or you're not smart enough to even understand what the man is saying. And the stuff about making New York City affordable, what is this, the Land of Oz? New York City is never going to be affordable, all right? It's a supply and demand situation. Millions of people want to live in Manhattan because there is economic opportunity in the financial and medical sectors. So you come here from all over the world, you can make money that drives up the cost of housing. Mandami can't do anything about the marketplace except seize property, which, of course, is what he wants to do. That's communism and socialism. And he can tax the hell out of any business he wants, which he will do as well. Now, that will cause people to flee New York City, and I think rates will come down for some rental units and perhaps for homes, because you'll have more people going out in the face of this unbelievable chaos that Mandani would create, then come in. So that might drive it down. But that's not what Hochul is talking about. Hochul is talking about a politician forcing prices in New York City to come down when Hochul herself has forced them up by congestion pricing, by parking regulations that are onerous. On and on and on and on. So this is just another example of how we, the people of New York, are subjected to the worst leadership of I have ever seen. This is worse in California. I don't know about Illinois. Maybe it's a tie. But boy, oh, boy. And finally, Hochul really hurt herself here. People are not going to forget this endorsement. And she is going to run for reelection. She may well lose. Let's hope so. Report yesterday, News 12, Westchester. Tara Rosenblum, the reporter. And it says, Eric Adams said to drop out of New York City mayor's race. Anonymous sources. Always a problem, Tara. Always A problem. Okay. Going to report something like that, which is big, and you're using people who don't want their names put out there. Ultra cautious. So I saw the report, and I was agnostic about it. That means I didn't believe it or disbelieve it. I went, I don't know. Because I have predicted, and I'll play a sound cut in a moment, that Adams will drop out. Now, Adams's spokesperson, Todd Shapiro, says there is no truth to rumors that Adams will drop out this week. Notice the words this week. Okay. Now, I'll just go over this briefly. I don't want to be redundant. I know a lot of you guys listen. Every night, Adams run out of money, and then he's got bills to pay, big bills. And once he runs out of PAC money, donated money, he's got to pay it out of his own pocket. That he will not do. Okay? It's not a beloved thing. It's not a helping Cuomo thing or helping Curtis Lewa. This is a. Now I got to pay. I don't want to do that. I don't want to run up $2 million in debt. So I can't continue. That's what this is. Here's what I said on September 2. Go. Everybody asked me, Osman Dami going to win. I think it's still a jump ball here, because I don't think Adams is going to be able to go from now until election day. Run out of money. Could be wrong. If Adams drops, then those votes have to go somewhere. And that's true. And a lion's share of the votes would go to Cuomo, but not all of them. I don't think many of them go to Mandani because he's a front runner now. So if you. If he was okay with you, you'd be on a train. Adams, no way. He wins. Now, I do know this to be a fact. Adams is trying to negotiate a job for himself. So he's trying to see if somebody will give him a position where he can earn some money in return for him dropping out. Those kinds of deals are made all the time, and they're not made in public. So I feel kind of bad for Tara Rosenblum, but I never use anonymous saucers. Terror. And there's a reason why. Because if you told me something anonymously and it turned out to be false, I would have to expose you. I would have to, or I lose credibility with my audience. So I'd have to say so and so told me and didn't want Their name mentioned that Adam's dropping out and he's not dropping out. So, so and so was wrong, I'd have to say. All right, so not a lot of people are going to tell me stuff anonymously because they know that's the rule here. Very, very hard. Anonymous sources can mislead all day long for all different reasons. Journalists do not have control of them, cannot confirm what they say. It's awful, Awful. But it's routine in America today. But again, once Adams drops out, then it'll be a flurry of new polling. Okay? And then the polling will become very important because it'll show where that 9, 10% vote will go. And Cuomo, he knows he's going to lose unless Adams drops out. But Adams doesn't care about Cuomo at all. There's no detente there. Adams may say, once he drops out, yeah, I'm supporting Cuomo. That might be part of the deal that he makes to get another job. And Curtis not dropping out. Cuomo wants Curtis to drop out, but Curtis is not going to do that because he despises Cuomo. So he's not going to drop out for personal reasons. And Curtis, I know this to be true, thinks he's got a shot to win. He thinks he can put together a coalition. Obviously, it's five to one, Democrat to Republican registration, New York City. But Curtis thinks he can peel off the law enforcement vote, and so he's going to go to the end, and that's his privilege. I mean, come on. I don't criticize anybody for doing that. So every morning I get newspapers delivered at my house on Long Island. The papers, the actual. I can hold it. I like that. I also get them on, on social media, the, you know, the email, all of that, but I'd rather read the paper. It's just old time habit, traditional guy, whatever. So there's an ad in the New York Post and it says, move to Connecticut. And it's got a picture of a real estate crew in Fairfield County. And there's no surprise about this ad, Mandani, there will be many people moving all over the place. Now, I'll get to Connecticut specifically in a moment because I did live there, but I want to give you some stats. Since Governor Hochul took office 2021-24, 677,000 people have left New York City. 677,000 people have moved out of New York City and New York State since Kougle's been governor. 1.3 million New Yorkers have left. Now, of course, they're being replaced by a variety of people. Not 100%. We've lost congressional representation in this state and our population is shrinking. Those are enormous numbers. Enormous. So what's happening now, and I know this because I live on Long island in a fairly affluent area, easy into the city, on the railroad is that the property values are going up, particularly in easy access in. They're going up a lot because city people are going. I'm not even going to chance it. Mandani is so dangerous to the economy, to personal wealth, to public safety. I want out of here, particularly families, because you're not going to believe the horror that's going to descend on New York City if that man gets elected. It's going to be dangerous. So people are moving away and then the real estate agency. It's all supply and demand. All right, so in my neighborhood, about 20% houses have gone up this year. These are nice houses, affluent neighborhood, as I said. But there's a flight. So the Connecticut people, they're trying to tap into this. So people want to keep their job. Manhattan, you go up to Fairfield county or Greenwich or any of those towns, they call them the southern shore towns. In Connecticut, you can get into the city on the train fairly easily. It's never, you know, it's always a little annoying, but you can get in. But Connecticut, if you're going there because you fear taxes, Connecticut is taxing you to death and there's no real reason why. Doesn't have a big metro center. Hartford, New Haven, the biggest towns. But the liberal governance up there is crazy. It's giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, give away, giveaway. So they have to raise the taxes. Property taxes are high, sales taxes are high. Every. Everything's hot. If you're looking for low tax, you got to go to the Carolinas, Florida, Texas, Tennessee can't go north. Except New Hampshire. New Hampshire is low tax state, but you're going to freeze your buns off up there. And you can't commute to New York. But anyway, these Connecticut people are smart because there will be a segment of New Yorkers who don't. And a commute by car on Long island is impossible. It's impossible. I live 22 miles from Midtown Manhattan. Took me an hour and a half easy. And it's not just rush hour either. 24, 7 now, Connecticut is lighter. It's still. The Stanford area is still a killer, but it's a lighter traffic footprint than Long Island. And Connecticut is a beautiful state. I mean, that southern shoreline is gorgeous. A Very nice place to live, but you better have some loot because the real estate is high. But anyway, it's shocking how many New Yorkers are leaving. And that is going to accelerate if Ma' am Donnie becomes mayor. And it's going to accelerate big time. And all of that will have negative consequences on those of us who have to live here. And I have to live here because of family, because of business, etcetera, Et cetera. But I want to live here too. I'm not in New York City, so I have to deal with that madness. Nassau county is much better run. What I want to tell you about is socialism. So socialism has taken root in New York City. Not surprising with the disparity between rich and poor. The wealthiest people in the world living on Park Avenue, Fifth Avenue, Central park. And then you've got desperately poor people in the outer boroughs. The desperately poor people, some of them anyway, say we can't make it. It's deck stacked against unfair whatever it may be. So we want the powerful people that run New York City and State to give us money because food stamps and public housing, that's all money. So we use a cover word, money. So you give it to us. It's called income inequality. You level the field. And the Democratic Party, the far left, the progressive movement says, okay, how much you want? And we'll take it from the wealthy people. We'll give it to you by high taxation. And that is a very appealing message to poor and some working class voters. They feel they don't have a chance in the capitalist system. They're never going to have the apartment on Park Avenue and they want as much as they can get from the government. So on CNN yesterday, they were analyzing a new poll that shows Mandami is well ahead in a mayoral race. Roll of tape. And I was looking at the polling from New York City and what you see is the clear plurality of New York Democrat, New York City Democrats think the idea of having a socialist mayor is a good idea matching what we see nationally. The bottom line is socialism isn't a dirty word among Democrats at this particular point. It's actually a word that one attached. Democrats seem to like it. And that's true. That analysis is true. They seem to like it because the bulk of their supporters are struggling economically. And this is the Fidel Castro thing. This is the, not so much Joseph Stalin, Communist Russia, because what Stalin did was he demonized the czar over there. And you learn about this in confronting evil. And then he told the people in Russia, hey, we'll get rid of the corrupt czar, and then we'll all have a much better life. Because that didn't turn out at all. It never does. Socialism doesn't work anywhere. And I'll give you a primer on that in a moment. But Castro comes in, in Cuba and says, hey, Batista is a corrupt guy, which he was, and we'll get rid of him. I'll take over and I'll give you all kinds of stuff. Well, next to Haiti, I think Cuba is the most impoverished nation in our hemisphere. That's not worked at all. So what socialism is, is basically a handout. It's a handout culture. And here's your food stamps, here's your housing subsidy, here's your free bus ride, on and on and on and on. Pay for that. They put very high taxation on individuals who are wealthy and corporations. Well, what's going to happen when Mandami is elected is that corporations and wealthy people will move out to be replaced by who? So the socialists are not going to have any money to do what they want to do. So they'll run up enormous debt and their economy will collapse. That's what's going to happen. And do you think that people in the Bronx, Brooklyn, parts of Queens understand that? I don't want to be arrogant about it, but I don't believe they do. And even if they did, I don't think they care. As long as I get my stuff, I'll vote for this guy because he's gonna give me more than Curtis Lewa or Cuomo or anybody. And that's why I'm voting for him. I want stuff. Give me stuff that's as simple as I can make it. That's exactly what's happening. And if Mandami is elected in November, the flight out of New York City and state is going to be dramatic. So Jimmy Kimmel, big headlines, I know him, appeared on his program five times. I analyzed it on my news program, the no Spin News, which you can access on billoriley.com and I'm not surprised. And I actually predicted in July that it very well could happen because Mr. Kimmel, along with Stephen Colbert and others, they let hate consume them, hatred of Donald Trump consume them. And if you're a comedian, that's not good. Okay? People just want a grin before they. Before they go to sleep. They don't want a political diatribe. That's oversimplifying it. But that was basically it. But what I didn't get into on my broadcast, that I want to Talk to you about now is a culture. It exists on both sides. Far left, far right. There is a culture, okay? So in Hollywood, In Manhattan, in D.C. in the liberal precincts, Massachusetts, Boston, some parts of Chicago, there's a mindset. And the mindset has been there for a long, long time. And it is that liberalism is good and conservatism is bad. Now, there's no exploration of why or specificity. If you were to interview the Hollywood celebrities who are liberal, and that's about what, 85, 90% of them, they couldn't tell you what liberalism is. They couldn't cite what their belief system is. They are bubble people. They live in a showbiz bubble. And all of the people that they socialize with think the way they do. And they know if they aren't liberal that the job opportunities in Hollywood will be fewer. It's reality out there, okay? So they go along. I'm a liberal, I'm a progressive, I'm this on that. And then they pick up stuff from social media, propaganda stuff, and they battle. That's what you hear. And they believe it because they want to believe it. It's not that they're being hypocrites, although some of them are, but not the majority. They believe what they want to believe, okay? And they believe that liberalism is noble and conservatism is evil. But I believe that spreads, spreads to other parts of the country, as I mentioned. Now, Jimmy Kimmel was a product of that. I know him and he wasn't a loon. I've been on his program five times and I had a good relationship with Jimmy Kimmel. But once Trump got into politics, Kimmel lost it. He hates him. And that consumed Jimmy Kimmel. Listen to this sound bite. After Trump was elected last November. Go. Let's be honest. It was a terrible night last night. It was a terrible night for women, for children, for the hundreds of thousands of hard working immigrants who make this country go. For health care, for our climate, for science, for journalism, for justice, for free speech. It was a terrible night for poor people, for the middle class, for seniors who rely on Social Security, for our allies in Ukraine, for NATO, for the truth and democracy and decency. And it was a terrible night for everyone who voted against him. And guess what? It was a bad night for everyone who voted for him too. You just don't realize it yet. Okay, so that's a political diatribe. And Mr. Kimmel is entitled to his belief system. But 77 million people voted for Donald Trump and Kimmel working for Disney is trying to get as big an audience as he can. He alienate 77 million people right off the jump. You know, if you want to be a political pundit like I am, that's where you go, Jim. If you want to be a comedian, entertainer, and trying to get the widest amount of people to watch you so your corporation can make money, you got to knock it off. But Kimmel couldn't. He literally couldn't. And every night after he got off his show smashing Trump or conservatives, he'll get calls from his friends. Oh, you're the best. You're the greatest, Jim. That was great. That was so great. And he's reinforced in it. Cold beer, same thing. And they live in that bubble. They don't go out of the bubble. Now the same bubble exists on the right. The neo Nazi crazy Klan people, whatever it may be, but they don't have the corporate support. There's no corporate support for the far right in America. They have no centrality. There's not a neo Nazi office in a lobbying arm in D.C. all right, they're poisonous or radioactive, as they should be. But the progressive left, it embraces socialism, sometimes communism. Oh, they're great. See the difference? So there's no power equivalency. The media, five full networks have embraced progressivism. Abc, NBC, cbs, CNN and Ms. Five. And then you got Fox on the other side and Newsmax, which is, you know, their audience level is not significant yet. So but. So it's like five against one. And that message that Trump is the devil over and over and over and over again. But now there's a rebellion. And that's why Kimmel got whacked. So Colbert was the first domino to fall. And Colbert refused to put any non liberal voices on his program. Totally blacked out any kind of traditional conservative guest. So did Kimmel. So does the View, so does all the network shows. That censorship, that's what Putin does, that's what Beijing does. Dangerous. Off the chart. One voice only can be heard on five networks. The left wing voice. Everybody else is shut out. I got the number one book in the country. Can I get on Good Morning America? No. I used to be able to get on it. How about the view? 20 times on a View with Barbara Walters. Can I get on there now? No. Total boycott. And not just me. Any kind of traditional pundit, author, movie maker. There will be John. That is a violation of freedom of speech. That is totalitarianism. You know, it was funny when Kimmel got waxy and I went nuts. Oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech. Freedom of speech. Okay, you got one conservative, traditional voice on your network, one CNN. What do you got? 50 liberals and you won't put me on. I can't get on cnn. I went right to Anderson Cooper. Anderson, come on. I know you for a long time. You and I are kicking around a little bit. I got a big book coming out. Didn't even return the email. Now, I know Cooper's afraid of me. Can't stand up to me, all right? But really disrespect. So, you know, I went over Cooper's show. Nothing. Never. An ascending point of view, Always. Oh, yeah, left is good. Left is good. Trump's the devil. Trump's the devil. Trump's devil. Trump's the devil. Now, there's been a rebellion on the part of the affiliated stations that own abc, CBS and NBC. So you got to understand it. Disney and Comcast and Paramount, now, they sold the Skydance. They own some of their stations, but the rest of them are owned by other companies. Okay, Like Sinclair. And there's a million of them, media companies. And those companies are saying, no, we're in Salt Lake City. We're in Boise, Idaho. We're in Jackson, Mississippi. We're in MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. we don't want this every night. Hey, Trump stuff. And that's why Kimmel got whacked. Because Next are the most powerful local news company in the country. Nextstar said to ABC and Burbank, we're dropping Kimmel. We're dropping them after what he said about Charlie Kirk, where MAGA people. He was implying MAGA people were responsible for the assassination. That's it. Critical mass. Our station group is dropping Kimmel. Disney panicked. No, what are we going to do? So what they did was they. Oh, what corporations always do. They got out in front, they said, no, no, no, we'll fire him. It's like, who could fire him first? That's what happened. A revolt on the part of the local stations across the country. Enough, Enough. They went with it far too long. They've been censoring and blackballing traditional conservative voices for more than a decade. Again, that's Putin stuff. So that's where we are. The murder of Charlie Kirk has focused everybody in on extreme ideology, and it's leading to all kinds of chaos in the media world. And that's not going to stop. We'll keep you apprised of it every step of the way. And once again, thank you very much for supporting Confronting Evil, 20 number one bestsellers. I could never have imagined it. Ever. Thank you for listening to Looking out for you. Remember to subscribe to my podcast feed. Also, consider becoming a Billorilly.com premium member. It will enhance your life. Sign up at Billorilly.com membership. Get access to full episodes of the no Spin News. We all have that moment. Ugh, where did I save that? Dropbox Dash New from Dropbox searches across across all your apps and tools. Even if you forgot what you named your video edit, your presentation deck, or your marketing plan. Even if it's buried in email, Slack, or a deck called finalfinal fourreal. And once it finds it, Dash can help you draft what comes next fast, from scattered to sorted without slowing down. Learn more at Dropbox.com/.
Episode: Looking Out For You - September 21, 2025
Host: Bill O’Reilly
Date: September 21, 2025
In this episode of No Spin News, Bill O’Reilly addresses the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, critiquing public and media reactions, analyzing recent political maneuvers in New York, and discussing broader cultural trends in American media and politics. The main theme centers on the dangers of ideological "bubbles," irresponsible commentary, and the consequences of unchecked extremism across political and media landscapes.
Timestamps: 01:00–12:50
Timestamps: 12:51–32:20
Timestamps: 32:21–38:52
Timestamps: 38:53–55:40
Timestamps: 55:41–59:30
O’Reilly maintains a direct, impassioned, and combative tone, often blending assertive analysis with personal anecdotes and historical references. He positions himself as an experienced independent truth-teller, critical of both ideological extremes and conventional media groupthink.
For listeners seeking a full breakdown of the episode’s insights and arguments—especially concerning the cultural ripple effects of political violence, media partisanship, and urban policy—this summary encapsulates all substantive content.