A (9:24)

Corporate megastores are spending millions lobbying D.C. politicians on one sided policies that send small businesses tumbling. They want to enact harmful credit card mandates that take resources away from your local credit union and community bank, leaving Main street businesses with less access to credit, making it harder for your family to pay for everyday goods like gas and groceries. Tell Congress to guard your card and oppose the Durbin Marshall credit card mandates.

B (9:51)

Paid for by electronic payments coalition.

C (9:54)

I believe most Americans see this Minnesota stuff for what it is a provocation of the federal government, a rebellion against social order. I believe most of us see that. And the Democratic party is standing opposed to that. Going to hurt him, particularly because it's a weak party with no leader. But if you are calling ICE Gestapo and you are supporting open borders and no supervision of foreign nationals and you won't even cooperate in the 10 states that I mentioned with criminal migrant investigations, you wouldn't even cooperate, then America's gonna walk away from you, in my opinion. Summing up, the federal government has to enforce immigration law, but it has to be done a little bit differently now. Situation is just too volatile. We don't want dead people, but we do want people held accountable. And that's a memo.

B (11:11)

You're listening to a special edition of the no spin News.

C (11:16)

So yesterday I just scorched 10 states who are in rebellion against the federal government. So if you are a premium or concierge member on billoriley.com you watch our show and get a transcript anytime you want. All right? And that is a very big convenience if you are a seeker of knowledge. So we went over that. This is a rebellion. And my column is up on billowrally.com that tells you which the states they are and what they're doing. And it's ironic because it happened 157 years ago. I believe it was Andrew Jackson. Same thing with South Carolina. And Jackson took care of South Carolina. You can't be in rebellion against the federal government. Well, anyway, I am now going to put forward to you a, I think a pretty good solution. Not a 100% solution, but something that would work. So we have a 1952 immigration law. 1952 has not been upgraded because both parties don't want to upgrade it. They both use it for political advantage. So there's no drive to have a new immigration bill or law set of new laws. None. So 1952, and President Truman vetoed that bill, but his veto was overridden by Congress. The reason that Truman vetoed it was he didn't believe the bill had enough non white opportunities for people to come to the United States. It was almost all white people that were allowed in here. That's why Truman vetoed it. Anyway, as everybody knows, Joe Biden let everybody in. No restraints. And according to the Migration Policy Institute, pretty good. They're pretty good. 14 million foreign nationals crashed in here under Biden. 14 million. Now there's a lower number put forth by Pew Research, 11 million. But it's still a colossal amount of people out of those 14, 11, whatever number you want to take, 10 to 15% are criminals, people who will hurt you. And that is a colossal number two, that you add the foreign criminals to the domestic criminals, and we have a wave, and we've seen it all right now. Biden didn't care. The Democratic Party doesn't care. They, in fact, the radical end of the Democratic Party continues to want an open border. That's what you're seeing in Minnesota, these people screaming about ICE and impeding ice. They don't want any restrictions, and they don't want to hunt down the criminals. That's who they are. It's hard to believe, but that's who they are. And you got to accept it, okay? So you can't surrender to it. And if I was on a Hannity radio program today, you might want to listen to that. I said, if I were the president, I'd have the FBI interviewing mayors and governors who will not enforce immigration law. By interviewing, I mean, you go in, the feds go in, you sit them down, and you say, why are you not doing X? Why are you not doing Y? When you know that federal law trumps your state law. Federal law, you know that in the Constitution. That's what I've been dealing now, because if you're going to rebel against the United States and you are leading the rebellion, you're in trouble. So that's. That has to be built. But that's not the solution. Here's the solution. So by executive order, again, Congress would never vote. You never get it into the Senate. Okay, by executive order, President Trump signs a proclamation that says if you are in this country without proper documentation, you need to go to your post office where there will be a Homeland Security form that you have to fill out. And the form will be your name, where you live, are you employed, how many children do you have? Where did you come from? On and on and on. You fill it out, you put it back into the prepaid envelope, and you send it to Washington to Homeland Security, which then enters your questionnaire into a database. Now, you have 90 days to do it. That's fair. Three months to do it. If you don't do it, then you are subject to immediate detention and deportation. That's it. You're going. And I don't think there's a court in the law that would block that, because that's national security. So then you separate the people and the thugs. The criminals are never going to answer the questionnaire, ever. So you put them in a category, and then you have the so called law abiding migrants in another category. And then you adjudicate them. So it goes into immigration courts where you have to, you'd have to hire a lot more judges to do it. But they look at it and they say, you know, there are some people who've claimed asylum, there are some people that are married to American citizens, on and on. What's your story? And then you get, the federal government sends you a conclusion. You have to appear at this point or you're okay for a year, whatever it may be. Okay. And you have to carry that card wherever you go. So if I stops you, you produce the card, I'm cooperating. Then ICE lets you go. Unless you commit a crime, unless they're hunting you for a crime, of course. So that way you get an orderly basis of deportation. You get to know who's here. And again, the bad guys aren't going to cooperate, make it a lot easier to get them out. You don't have that card, you can't produce it. Okay. It's like a license. Where's your id? You got to produce this part of your id. So what's the downside to that? The liberals will say, privacy. Privacy. What are you talking about? You're not supposed to be here. It's a privilege to be here. You have to go through a process to be here. Privacy. I don't believe the courts, you know, the state courts in the rebellion places, of course, but federal courts are going to go. This makes sense. And this allows the federal government to step away and use a less heavy hand, which is good for the nation. All right. I can't do better than that. I've been thinking about this for a long time. And again, bill@billorilly.com Billabill o'reilly.com I'd like to know whether you support or oppose that.

B (18:10)

You're listening to a special edition of the no Spin News.

C (18:14)

Well, here's something to think about. There's no question President Trump is governing in a non collaborative way. All right? That means his way or the highway. And if you don't like it, then you can take him to court or try to get Congress involved or whatever. But there is a method to use a cliche to the president's madness. So he believes he has a mandate. 77 million Americans voted for him to correct what the Biden administration screwed up, which is colossal if you are any kind of fair and analyst. Just the border alone is so catastrophic. And President Trump says, look, the American people elected me to clean this mess up, and I'm going to clean it up. In addition, I'm going to impose a new world order on the globe. Foreign policy is going to be pro American. I am going to create a country that is so powerful that few will defy it. But I don't need Congress to do it, and I don't need the courts, because you can litigate all day long, but it just holds it up. Trump wants to go fast, and he has in his first year. He doesn't want Congress to be deliberating for five months, and he doesn't want it. So the question then becomes, is he overstepping his authority? Is the president overstepping? And that will be debated this year. Okay, 2026, you're going to have a lot of definition there. But in the meantime, Donald Trump's going to do what he wants to do, full steam ahead on immigration, on foreign policy, and if he's blocked, he's blocked. Meanwhile, Congress is so partisan, it's really hard to get any alternatives out of them. As far as. Well, we have a better idea. We in the Senate have a better idea. No, you don't. If you do, it's a mystery. And I'm talking general, across the board. All right, that. Not my talking points. That's just setting up my talking points, because we have three major stories in play here. Iran, ICE and Denmark, and they're all very, very different. But President Trump's future hinges upon those three stories at this moment, and the economy as well. Okay, Iran. So right now, the Pentagon has worked up a number of military engagements there. It's just a matter of Mr. Trump's order. I don't know what they are. Nobody does. It's top secret. They've walled it off. There's no leaks. We don't know. I did talk to the president personally on Saturday, and I said, in my opinion, because I was asked, okay, I wouldn't use military action unless it's a tipping point. You don't need to send any more messages. You already did that with the nuke bombing. But if you can get them out of there, Mr. President, the mullahs, you can get them on that flight to Moscow by, say, wiping out the Revolutionary Guard headquarters. I do it in a heartbeat. Got to get them out. And I believe it will happen. I think the mullahs are done, and that'll be a tremendous victory for the USA and the world. But I could be wrong. But anyway, the actions have been drawn up. We don't know when, where, we don't know and it could happen at any time. Remember, Tehran, the capital of Iran, is 8 and a half hours ahead of us. And this is not going to be a daylight action. These are going to be under the cloak of darkness. And so I'm going to be on it for the next whenever it takes watching, I check it every 30 minutes because all hell could break loose at any time. But again, I do believe the mullahs are done, and I really hope that's true. Okay, the second is ice, which this is very interesting. The protests against ICE are not organic, as they say. It's not like everybody's run into the streets like Vietnam or anything like that. These are very well organized, far left generated protests. And the nexus, of course, is in Minneapolis, where Ms. Good was shot dead by an ICE agent last week. But this has not caught on across the country, even though there are 10 states in active rebellion against the federal government, which I write about in my column on bill o'reilly.com okay, this is a rebellion. It's not a protest. There's a big difference. Okay, they are refusing to obey the law. Now, the third one is Denmark. And I'm going to just take a little time at the end of the talking points to explain the danger for Donald Trump here. This is the most dangerous story. Denmark, not ice, not Iran, Denmark and Greenland. That's the most dangerous for him. Now, getting back to Iran, there are, even before any military action, liberal Americans, Democrats who say, well, you can't keep doing this. You can't keep going into Venezuela, grabbing a dictator there, and then go and get the mullahs out of there. You need Congress to approve all this. And I debated Chris Cuomo on News Nation last night about that subject. Go. Let me ask you something else, though. Iran.

B (23:51)

I don't understand a legitimate basis in law for any president to say, oh, this, this regime, they're bad. I don't like what they're doing to their people. I think I'll use the military and not have to go through Congress.

C (24:04)

How can the president do that in Iran?

B (24:07)

With Cargurus Discover, you can skip the filters and describe what you're looking for in your own words. Simply type what you want and Cargurus Discover instantly surfaces real listings that match your exact needs. It's no wonder Cargurus is the number one most visited car shopping site according to SimilarWeb's estimated traffic data. Buy or sell your next car today with CarGurus at CarGurus. Go to CarGurus.com to make sure your big deal is the best deal. That's C A R G u r u s.com cargurus.com under the National Security banner.

C (24:41)

Because Iran, and we saw that with Soleimani when Trump took him out with a drone. I wrote about that in my book Killing the Killers. Iran continues to fund worldwide terrorism and gives them billions of dollars, billions with a B. That's a national security threat to the United States. So under national security, if you can neutralize somebody like Soleimani or isis, as Trump did with the assistant of Barack Obama, you can do it without congressional approval. And that's what he'll use. And that's true. So the Democrats can jump up and down. I can sue, they can do this, they can do that. The president has the authority, based upon what happened after 9, 11, to take out national security threats without getting permission. And he has. All right. That's what he's doing. It's all about national security. Drug dealing into the United States, massive amounts of narcotics. National security, okay? Mueller's funding, Hezbollah, Hamas, all the terror groups. National security courts aren't going to go against that. At the higher level, the partisan courts will, but not up in the Supreme Court or even the appeals courts. Okay, now let's get to Greenland. So today there's a meeting, closed door, and we don't have anything yet. And I might break if it does. I'll tweet about it at Bill O'Reilly. It's important you keep us on the band. So we don't know yet, but we know, obviously, a hard line of meeting. Vice President Stair Vance and Marco Rubio, Secretary of State. A meeting with the Danish foreign minister and his Greenland counterpart. Now, I fully expect them to work out some kind of deal because if the United States invades Greenland with troops, which is, I can't imagine that that would ever happen. I said that to President Trump. I think this would fracture the NATO alliance. You can't do that. Putin will be a winner because all the European NATO countries that turn against the United States, every single one of them. Maybe Hungary wouldn't, but that's it. You can't. And then the United States, American people don't want the US Military in Greenland. Every single poll shows that. And Republicans don't want it either. And then Congress, my God, they'll go crazy. And that would tilt it against the Republicans in the midterm. So there is a bill introduced by Lisa Murkowski, who's supposedly a Republican, but she's really not, and Senator Jeanne Shaheen in New Hampshire that says you can't do this. You can't invade Greenland with U.S. troops. Now, that's going to pass the Senate. That bill is going to pass, and it might pass the House of Representatives. Now, Trump could veto it, but you can see the unbelievable deficit that President Trump would create for himself and the Republican Party. He doesn't have to do it. You know, I'm a cocky guy. You guys all know that. I said, look, send me over to Copenhagen. I'll come back with any deal you want in 48 hours. And I would. It's not that hard to get military bases up there without them there in the past. Denmark's not going to object to that. Mineral rights. We can get them. We don't need to put military boots on the ground there. So, anyway, I expect the deal would be worked out. I'd be shocked if President Trump ever sends US Military to Greenland. This is his negotiating ploy. Huff and puff and blow the House down and then we'll get a deal. That's what he always does. But this one, very dangerous.

B (28:44)

Thank you for listening. Remember to subscribe to the Bill O'Reilly podcast feed and consider becoming a premium or concierge member@billor.com. How many discounts does USAA Auto Insurance offer? Too many to say here. Multi vehicle discount, Safe driver discount, new vehicle discount, Storage discount.

A (29:08)

How many discounts will you stack up? Tap the banner or visit usaa.com autodiscounts restrictions.