Loading summary
Transcript44 lines
- [00:00]
Ryan Reynolds
Hey, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I don't know if you've heard, but Mint's Premium Wireless is $15 a month. But I'd like to offer one other perk. We have no stores. That means no small talk. Crazy weather we're having. No, it's not. It's just weather. It is an introvert's dream. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment.
- [00:24]
Mint Mobile Announcer
At $45 for three month plan. $15 per month equivalent required. New customer offer first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and fees extra.
- [00:29]
Ryan Reynolds
See mintmobile.com you're listening to the no Spin News Talking Points edition.
- [00:37]
Bill O'Reilly
The subject of the Talking Points memo this evening is this ongoing government shutdown, which you know is heavily misreported. This drives me nuts, but there's nothing I can do about it other than to tell you the truth, which is why you're here watching and listening to me. All right, so the shutdowns in day six, and there are people getting hurt for them. People work for the federal government, you know, the touring the parks, things like that. I suspect it's not going to last all that much longer, but I could be wrong on that. Now it's all about the Democrats being very angry about the big beautiful bill. Remember the big beautiful bill signed into law on July 4th? Furious. Because that bill mitigated government spending in a bunch of areas, but one in particular, health care. It said no Medicaid payments unless you're looking for a job. The progressive left Democratic Party went wild, wild with that. They hate that. I don't know what the big deal is. I mean, that bill was laden with. You can volunteer if you can't look for a job physically. If you're infirmed, you can get a doctor's note. I mean, my God. But the progressive left doesn't want any restraints at all. So they're trying to what they call claw back some of the restrictions from the big beautiful bill on health care spending. And the Democratics are saying if you don't give us these give backs, we're going to keep the government shut down. That's what's going on. And there's an ancillary thing about illegal immigration also. Now the press doesn't understand what this is all about. Doesn't particularly care, just wants to blame Trump. We know the game. And so they're sympathetic to the Democratic Party and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Roll a tape.
- [02:51]
Hakeem Jeffries
If Republicans continue to refuse to extend the Affordable Care act tax Credits. Tens of millions of American taxpayers are going to experience dramatically increased premiums, co pays and deductibles. And that information from their insurance companies is going out right now. Now, federal law clearly prohibits the expenditure of taxpayer dollars to provide health care to undocumented immigrants, period, full stop. And no Democrat on Capitol Hill is trying to change that law.
- [03:24]
Bill O'Reilly
All right. Well, I'm simply gibberish. Number one, the Republican Party has clearly stated we will negotiate an extension of the Affordable Care Act. But when it's not going to do a mandate for you to throw everything you want back in the hopper. When we passed a tax and spend law on July 4, that makes sense to me. The Republicans say we will negotiate a new, not a new law, but a new spending parameter. Okay, remember, we're $37 trillion in debt here. And by Jeffrey saying that, full stop, which is a terrible cliche, that's not true. So the following states do give health, taxpayer health care to migrants, to illegal aliens, Oregon, California, Minnesota, Washington, D.C. not a state. And then other states give subsidies. Washington, Colorado, New York, Illinois. This all comes from National Immigration Law Center. Okay, so don't tell me that taxpayer money isn't going for the health care of illegal immigrants. It is not across the board, but in those big places. Now those are big states and California has the biggest nut. I mean, California, New York, Illinois is a big states. This is trillions of dollars of health care going to undocumented people. Well, no, no, it's not. It's not. It is. And it goes through the Medicaid process. It's not direct payments. It goes through it. So. But you would think that the woman interviewing Jefferies would say, well, you know, O'Reilly has this information. What about this Jeffries? What would he say? Would he deny it? Couldn't. Okay. So we are in a situation where what's likely to happen is there will be set negotiations on the affordable health care, which I support to some extent. Not for undocumented migrants, of course, but if you are a destitute person in America, you need some kind of coverage. So if you're 85 year old widow and you are under siege, you can't let these people die. You can't. Okay. If you hard right people who are, you know, sorry and there are millions of people in that circumstance. I know it's abused, but come on. So let's negotiate. All right. A fair system, but don't shut down the government. And that's the memo. Hey, Bill O'Reilly here. I'd like to tell you about an important new book. Leland Vitters, Born Lucky. A dedicated father, a grateful son. In my journey with autism, Born Lucky gives hope to millions of American parents who have a child with autism, adhd, or any developmental disorder. Read Born Lucky today. Good job, Leland Vitter.
- [06:56]
Ryan Reynolds
You're listening to a special edition of the no Spin News.
- [07:01]
Bill O'Reilly
So there's a constitutional showdown coming up between President Trump and the blue states. Oregon, Illinois, California, Massachusetts, New York, on and on. And it's about illegal immigration. The blue states do not want to obey federal law. Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401. Tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five star reviews and an A from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998899. Again, that's 866326, 5576 or text BILL to 998999.
- [08:32]
Mike Baker
Hey, Mike Baker here, host of the President's Daily Brief podcast. If you want straight talk on national security, foreign policy and the biggest global stories going on of the day, this is the show for you. We publish twice a day, Monday through Friday, once in the morning, again in the afternoon. And on the weekend we go longer with the PDB Situation Report with excellent guests including national security insiders and foreign policy experts. Check us out on Spotify, Apple or wherever you get your podcasts. Also on our YouTube channel at PresidentsDaily Brief.
- [09:03]
Bill O'Reilly
And they aren't. They're basically saying we're not obeying and take us to court to do what you president says. All right. I'm sending in troops and federal agents to enforce immigration law. It's a very easy conflict to understand, but there is no resolution to it yet. The Supreme Court will have to do that. That's the setup. Okay. Now, the current immigration law that we have now was put into effect in 1952. 1952. They have not upgraded immigration law in 74 four years. Are you kidding me? Harry Truman was president when Congress passed the immigration law Immigration and Nationality act of 1952. Truman vetoed it Never signed it, but Congress overrode his veto. And essentially it said that illegal entry into the United States, this is under the U.S. code 8, 1325, is a crime. You come here without a valid passport. If you sneak across the border, it is a crime subject to a fine or six months in prison or both. Okay? Now, Truman didn't like the law because he felt that it was putting quotas on certain countries, which it was all right, you know, like that. But Congress said, too bad, Harry. We're passing a law. And they did. Now, President Biden refused to obey the 1952 law. This whole mess that we're in now is Biden's fault. So he and his minions in the White House just said, not going to enforce it. The clearest example is if you want asylum in the United States, you have to apply for it at a port of entry. No, Biden did not enforce that. So anyone who was caught sneaking into the United States, I want asylum, because that's what the drug cartels, smuggling cartels, told them to say. And the Border Patrol then immediately put them into a confined area, and then Biden released them. Catch and released. And we paid the bus and plane tickets, and then they went wherever they went, and they had to show up in five years for a hearing, which, of course, most of them never do. That was all on Joe Biden. It is absolutely an outrage what the man did. He wasn't held to account by Congress. Not impeached. Very. The press didn't care, and Biden just skated along for four years. The result, 15 million undocumented people came in under the Biden administration. Enter President Trump, who campaigns that I am going to get the undocumented people out of the country. A lot of people. 15 million. Okay. Now, in the past, you had to have a judge sign an order of deportation. That's impossible now. Not enough judges, not enough courts, not enough anything. The judge cannot sign a deportation order for 15 million people. So the Trump administration, on January 21st of this year, when Trump took over, said, we're going to have a new policy called expedited removal. Now, it wasn't passed by Congress. You just executive order expedited and removal. Homeland Security. If they catch you, they're booting you. There is a way around that. If a migrant hires an attorney, an immigration attorney, and they say no, the person fears for his or her life. You got to go into the process. Then there is that. They can't boot them if an attorney gets involved. But these migrants can't speak English. They don't have any money. That. So expedited removal is, we catch you, you're gone. You don't need a judge signing a deportation order that has got to be adjudicated by the Supreme Court because that's brand new and it's underway. Enter the progressive left, which says, oh, no, we don't want anybody removed. Due process this, that and the other. We don't want anybody renewed. And we're not going to cooperate with Homeland Security and ICE agents to find anybody. In fact, we're going to stop them if we can. All right, so the blue states are interfering with the federal law because they don't like it. Now, that is the problem right there. However, it is a crime to interfere with federal law. It's a crime. And that is what has happened in Chicago and Oregon to some extent. So if you, the word is hinder. If you hinder a federal investigation, be charged with a federal crime. Certainly the governors of Illinois, Oregon, Massachusetts, all are hindering federal investigations. And so are the mayors, Johnson and the Senate. They're hindering. And I will now prove it. Okay, so the U.S. code 18, 1505 says, quote, whoever with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, this is in writing or obstruct compliance with any civil investigated demand commits a crime. So if you are preventing federal agents from rounding up undocumented people, it's a crime. You're hindering a federal investigation. It's right there. 18 U.S. code 1505. All right, now, President Trump has not ordered and his Justice Department to put Pritzker and Johnson and all these people in handcuffs. Could. But that would escalate this to a very, very high level. Level. However, now there is irrefutable proof that this is happening. You Remember on Saturday, ICE, three ICE agents in Chicago, 10 cars driven by protesters approached and one woman tried to run them down. They had to shoot the woman. She didn't die. She's an FBI custody now. But the ICE agent shot her. The Chicago Police Department immediately knew that there was trouble. Here's what the dispatcher said. Roll it.
- [16:37]
Police Dispatcher
And again, for the chief of patrol, we have all the units that per 999. Chief of Patrol said all units clear out from there. We're not sending anybody over to that location. 62, we're gonna clear out as soon as we can spot. We're, we're like locked in over here. So we're gonna do the best we can to get out of here as soon as we can.
- [17:00]
Bill O'Reilly
The chief of patrol for the Chicago Police Department is a Man named John Hein. H E I n. He ordered his police officers not to help the ICE agents or prevent the shooting of that woman. He hindered a federal investigation which led to violence. Hines should be in jail now, in prison now, or bailed out. You can't do that. I don't know whether the Justice Department is going to take any action at all, but they could. I would if I were attorney General. You can't have that. That's anarchy. Now, the Chicago chief of police, a man named Larry Snelling, he knows that his chief of patrol, second in command, committed a federal crime. He knows it. Snelling. Here's what he said.
- [18:00]
Hakeem Jeffries
Our officers were not told to stand down. Our officers were out there throughout the entire event. I would never tell our officers to stand down because if our officers were in trouble and we needed help from other officers, I would expect those officers to step in and help us. And it's the same thing that we do on our side.
- [18:21]
Bill O'Reilly
Snow. He's not telling the truth. Obviously, the tape contradicts him. He goes, our officers were not told to stand down. Yeah, they were.
- [18:30]
Craig Carton
Hey there, it's your buddy, Craig Carton. And if you're like me, you could use a timeout from the chaotic news cycle, a pause from the politics, a break from the bedlam. I'm inviting you to join me every day on the Craig Carton Show Podcast where we tackle the biggest sporting events of the day and give honest, hot takes on and off the field. Sports talk should be fresh, informative and fun, and that's what we deliver every single day. So give your ears a much needed vacation. It's time to tune out the noise and take a break from the nonstop news cycle. Subscribe now to the Cray Carton Show Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [19:14]
Miranda Devine
Power, politics and the people behind the headlines.
- [19:18]
Bill O'Reilly
Our country's back. We're really back.
- [19:21]
Miranda Devine
Candid conversations with the people making the rules and changing the game.
- [19:27]
Bill O'Reilly
Can you see yourself as president one day? I don't think about that.
- [19:30]
Mint Mobile Announcer
We just had an invasion over our southern border.
- [19:33]
Bill O'Reilly
My husband is in the corner, for the record, pumping his fist right now that you're asking this question.
- [19:38]
Miranda Devine
This is real talk with lawmakers, newsmakers and political disruptors.
- [19:45]
Bill O'Reilly
I think Elon's port probably fancies himself more of a Viking. I think I'm more of a ninja.
- [19:50]
Miranda Devine
Join me, Miranda Devine, host of podforce One, for insightful talk, news making moments and behind the scenes podcast peeks at what makes America's greatest minds tick. Find podforce one on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [20:10]
Bill O'Reilly
Your ratings are very good, and I want to congratulate you. And it's. There's no two sides to the story. Chief, you're looking like you're not an honest man. Okay, let's get to the Supreme Court. They're going to have to sort all this out because it is one big mess. And Congress is at fault because you don't keep an antiquated law from 1952 on the books without updating it. In the face of Armageddon, in the face of unbelievable intrusion on the part of foreign nationals to this country, Congress doesn't do a thing because both parties uses this for their own political benefit. The conservatives want everybody out, the liberals want everybody in. So the Democrats want everybody in, and the Republicans won't, you know, they don't want to compromise on it. So that's just Congress. So the Supreme Court's got to step in. Now. In my possession is a document. I don't know if this document is in anyone else's possession. I have the original document. It is signed by then Attorney General Robert Kennedy. In 1963, this is when the President, John F. Kennedy, sent 17,000 National Guard troops to Alabama to force Governor Wallace and the state to admit nine students into Alabama public schools. Because Alabama was not obeying the civil rights law they were flaunting. We're not going to obey it. 17,000 were ordered down. So RFK writes a memo to a senator from Louisiana who was, of course, on the side of Alabama, saying, no, no, no, you don't have the right to send a guard. Here. Here's what RFK said, quote, when it appeared that the commands of that order had not been obeyed and the obstruction of justice was continuing, the President on the same day issued Executive Order 1111, authorizing and directing the Secretary of Defense to take all appropriate steps to remove obstruction of justice in the state of Alabama. For this purpose, he was authorized and directed, inter alia. Inter alia means, among other things, to call into active military service of the United States and use any or all units of the Army National Guard or Air National Guard of the state, Alabama. Both the proclamation, Executive Order were issued under and expressly invoked the Authority of the U.S. code, Title 10. Now, that is justification for what Donald Trump is doing right now. Okay? Robert Kennedy called it obstruction of justice. I'm calling it hindering a federal investigation. But it's the same thing. When a state city county, whatever it is, says to the federal government, we're not obeying the federal law. The President has the authority to move in and force them to do it. Okay? Now, the President does not have the authority to run the Chicago Police Department, but if somebody in that department hinders the feds, which obviously happened in Chicago, they can be charged. All right? So I think that's the best analysis you're ever going to get of what is happening now. It'll go to the Supreme Court, and I expect the Supreme Court will rule five to four, maybe six to three in President Trump's favor. The liberal judges don't care about the law or the Constitution. They just vote on. And some conservative judges, too, to be fair, do. But on this case, with that Kennedy memo, okay? And I actually sent that memo that I have because I don't think anybody else has it to the White House. I sent it there. Now, whether they look at. I don't even know. That's my job as an American citizen and a journalist.
- [24:30]
Ryan Reynolds
You're listening to a special edition of the no Spin News Talking Points memo.
- [24:37]
Bill O'Reilly
Is about the brawl in the Senate yesterday. So before former FBI Director James Comey was indicted. We'll tell you about that in a couple of minutes, the Senate Judiciary Committee, that's the big oversight committee, invited Attorney General Bondi to testify about Epstein. And now there's accusations against Tom Holman that he may have taken a bribe. You know, stuff that the Attorney General deals with. Now, Ms. Bondi is a smart woman. I had a long conversation with her in September, and she knows the game, that the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee are going to try to use her to embarrass Trump. They don't care about information. They know that any accusation against anybody can't be discussed by the Attorney General because we have due process here. You're innocent until proven guilty. Homin have been charged with anything? Is there an investigation? Maybe. Maybe the FBI is looking into it. I don't know. But they're not going to tell you. In case Homan is innocent, why would you besmirch him? So the Democratic senators know that and Pam Bondi knows it. So there's no answer to any question. The Epstein thing is ridiculous. It's just absurd. There are rumors and innuendo and the Attorney General's not going to answer those things. Get mired in that swamp. Who would do that? All right, so Ms. Bondi went into the hearing with written put downs. That's the best word of the senators. She knew we're going to use these tactics. Roll the tape.
- [26:42]
Police Dispatcher
Senator, I would be more concerned if I were you, when you talk about corruption and money, that you. That when you pushed for legislation that would subsidize your wife's company. You know, Senator Whitehouse, you sit here and make salacious remarks, once again trying to slander President Trump left and right, when you're the one who was taking money from one of Epstein's closest confidants. I believe I could be wrong. Correct me, Reid Hoffman, who was with Jeffrey Epstein on multiple occasions, and the senator sitting right next to you tried to block the flight logs from being released. I wish you love Chicago as much as you hate President Trump. And currently the National Guard are on the way to Chicago. If you're not going to protect your citizens, President Trump will. Will first. Senator Padilla, you have gone on for over five minutes. And I wish that you loved your state of California as much as you hate President Trump. Would be in really good shape then, because violent crime in California is currently 35% higher than the national average.
- [27:47]
Bill O'Reilly
All right, so it was amusing to watch the put downs and then the replies and all, but did it do anybody any good? Did you learn anything? No. Right? No. It was just like an insult derby. And that's what politics has descended into. Now, the last time that the Justice Department was actually given a referral, a criminal referral from the Senate, was six years ago. So these hearings are just a total waste of time. And they play to the cameras knowing that the Internet and the cables will pick up the stuff to be as outrageous as possible. It's just really. It's wrong. It's just wrong. They're not representing they being on both sides, but mostly the Democrats because they hate Trump so much. And, you know, look, I want some problem solving here. Stop with this nonsense. The attack on Epstein, Epstein is in. Whenever you hear that name, you know.
- [29:07]
Mint Mobile Announcer
Hello, is this Pacific Source Health Plans?
- [29:09]
Bill O'Reilly
This is a health plan.
- [29:10]
Mint Mobile Announcer
I'm trying to reach Pacific Source.
- [29:13]
Bill O'Reilly
I know.
- [29:13]
Mint Mobile Announcer
I'll get a person on the phone.
- [29:14]
Police Dispatcher
When I call them.
- [29:15]
Mint Mobile Announcer
What do you think I am? I mean, you sound like a person. That's what counts. Automated systems can do a lot, even sound a lot like people. What automated systems can't do is offer the quality our members rely. Empathy. When you call Pacific Source Health Plans, you'll talk to a person who cares.
- [29:32]
Police Dispatcher
What did you say your name was?
- [29:34]
Mint Mobile Announcer
Nexa 9000.
- [29:35]
Bill O'Reilly
Hmm.
- [29:36]
Mint Mobile Announcer
No newspaper is more iconic than the New York Post. So why not start your day with me telling you our best stories? I'm Caitlin Becker, host of the New York Post. Every weekday morning, I'll break down the headlines that matter to you and the stories you're going to want to talk to your friends about. It's a mix of politics, business, pop culture, basically everything you expect from the New York Post. Ask your smart speaker to play the NYPOST podcast, listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [30:07]
Bill O'Reilly
That it's only being used to try to smear and demean Donald Trump. That being said, another cliche. The Justice Department should define what the Epstein thing is. They should tell the American people, this is what we have. This is a conclusion that we've reached. Now, this could change, but that is so simple to do. Take away that club from the radical left. So I don't know why the Justice Department doesn't do that. On the other stuff, you know, again, I don't know what Holman did or didn't do, but you don't besmirch him and try to ruin him on innuendo. And Bondi was right to avoid those questions. And that's the memo.
- [30:57]
Ryan Reynolds
You're listening to a special edition of the no Spin News Talking Points Memo.
- [31:03]
Bill O'Reilly
Senate votes down a resolution to stop Trump's attack on drug vessels in the Caribbean. Okay, why, why would you do that? Now, the resolution failed, but not by much. Not by much. The vote was 51 for failure. We're not going to do it to 48. Yeah, let's stop them. A number of politicians. No, I mean, this is pretty, pretty standard. Rand Paul, what are you going to do? Senator from Kentucky, he voted for the resolution to stop the attacks. Lisa Murkowski in Alaska, she's not a Republican. You guys up there, I'm not telling you to vote for, but Senator Murkowski is not a Republican. I don't think she's a Democrat either. I don't know what she is, but she's certainly not a Republican. And then Fetterman, the Democrat from Pennsylvania, he voted to allow the President continue to tack the drug crafts. Now, president has the authority because he declared the drug cartels in Venezuela, which are doing all this, as terrorists, terror groups. You remember after 9, 11, Bush the younger said, look, I got to have the authority to attack these Al Qaedas and ISIS and everybody else. I can't go to Congress every two minutes to get permission to attack these people. So if we designate them terrorists, we can attack them. That's exactly the law. So this is just another demonstration of hate Trump, that's what this is. So you will not be surprised that the two people heading this are Senator Adam Schiff and Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia. They hate Trump. They're doing everything they can to stop everything Trump wants to do. Okay, do you think that's in benefit of the United States then? You, you're entitled to your opinion, but you're a, sorry to be blunt. So if I'm trying to stop more than a hundred thousand deaths a year in this country and it's, and it's three times that with all the health stuff that comes from taking narcotics, but trying to stop that, and I have the authority to use the military against the drug smugglers. I do, right? I do. Now the, hey Trump people, the Democrats go, we don't have any proof. Well, yeah, you do. Number one, the Dominican Republic found some of the debris from one of these blown up boats, all this cocaine floating around. And number two, why would anybody bother to attack some guy out fishing, you know, Come on. So we have very good intel inside Venezuela and they know when these boats are going out and that's what's happening. All right, so I'm going to play you, Adam Schiff, probably Trump's biggest enemy. Roll a tape. It is hard to describe just how extraordinary and dangerous this action is and the kind of precedent that it sets because there are lots of ships carrying narcotics, tragically, a lot of them headed for the United States, many headed for Caribbean countries. And our practice has always been to interdict those ships. And how did that work out there, Senator, the interdiction thing, how did it work out under Biden? Let's get to the Pacific. How did it work out interdicting the ships that work out pretty well. Well, according to Border Patrol, Biden's last year, 23, 24, record amount of fentanyl seas, which means a record amount was coming over £20,000, kill 20 million people easy. Okay, so how did that work out, that interdiction go? Let's go all the way back, okay, to Vietnam. Never been a shortage in narcotics in America. Never. You want heroin, you want cocaine, methamphetamine, hey, you go out, you find out where the dealer is, you buy the dealer. Never a shortage, an interdiction that was working pretty well, wasn't it? Now the fact that the United States is now blowing drug boats out of the water, that is an inhibitor. Okay, so, so if you're on that boat, you go, oh, that's why Maduro, the leader of Venezuela, who's up to here in the narcotics. Okay? He's getting paid tens of millions of dollars, in my opinion. I can't prove it, but to Norco State, Venezuela. That's why he doesn't want this. This is his money. So Schiff is. Look, I got no respect for the man. I'm sorry. And there are Republican senators I don't respect either. Murkowski. Okay? So I'm not. It's not a partisan play. But he's like, if. If Trump wants it, I don't want it. And that's a memo.
- [36:40]
Ryan Reynolds
Thank you for listening. Remember to subscribe to the Bill O'Reilly podcast feed and consider becoming a premium or concierge member@bill o'reilly.com.