Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis Episode: No Spin News - Weekend Edition - June 28, 2025
Release Date: June 28, 2025

Introduction and Iran Nuclear Strike Discussion

In the opening segment of the No Spin News Weekend Edition at [00:01], host Bill O’Reilly welcomes Bernard Goldberg from bernardgoldberg.com. The primary focus is on President Donald Trump’s recent military action against Iran's nuclear program. Goldberg clarifies his stance, stating, “I come to my conclusions based on facts. So sometimes I agree with Donald Trump, sometimes I don't. In this case, I'm totally with President Trump” ([00:29]). He emphasizes that Trump's approach was a decisive break from previous presidents' diplomatic strategies, arguing that Iran would not have voluntarily dismantled its nuclear ambitions without strong intervention.

O’Reilly probes whether the action relates to Israel, to which Goldberg responds by highlighting the broader risk assessment, mentioning, “it has to do with risks being weighed against other risks” ([02:06]). The discussion underscores the moral imperative to prevent a Zealot Islamist regime from acquiring nuclear weapons, with Goldberg supporting Trump’s decisive measures as the right course of action.

Isolationism within the Republican Party

The conversation shifts to the growing isolationist sentiment within the Republican Party. O’Reilly points out the paradox of isolationists opposing actions that he views as necessary for national security, questioning, “they don't care whether Iran has a nuclear weapon or not. That's kind of strange, don't you think?” ([03:25]). Goldberg argues that such isolationist views are immoral, equating the progressive wing of the Democratic Party with the isolationist faction of the GOP. He criticizes the mindset that prioritizes "America first" to the extent of disregarding global stability and the inherent risks of empowering hostile nations.

Conversation with Eric Bolling

Transitioning to a dialogue with Eric Bolling from Real America's Voice ([13:39]), the discussion delves deeper into isolationism. Initially opposing the bombing due to concerns over American pilots' safety, Bolling reveals a shift in his perspective after witnessing the precision of the strike. He notes, “If it goes no further, I'm absolutely for it” ([15:38]), acknowledging the effectiveness of Trump’s actions in neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

O’Reilly challenges Bolling’s stance by questioning the broader implications of continued isolationism, such as the potential for China to invade Taiwan if Russia succeeds in Ukraine. Bolling maintains that bolstering domestic capacities, like chip production, is more beneficial and aligns with national interests, asserting that involving the U.S. directly in foreign conflicts could escalate into larger wars ([18:08]).

Analysis of MAGA Faction Split

The dialogue highlights a significant split within the MAGA movement. Bolling describes factions within the party, noting, “I think there's a split in MAGA that needs to be 50, 50, maybe 60, 40 in favor of what Trump did” ([22:00]). This internal conflict centers around differing views on foreign intervention and national strategy. O’Reilly expresses uncertainty about the size and influence of the isolationist constituency, suggesting that unintended consequences of Trump’s actions could sway more Republicans towards isolationism ([22:26]).

Congressional Response and Ethics Discussion with Nicole Malliotakis

The episode introduces Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis from New York ([27:15]), who joins O’Reilly to discuss the recent impeachment attempts by Congress members Castron and Cortez against Trump’s Iran action. Malliotakis vehemently criticizes their actions, stating, “they had the nerve to try to impeach the president of the United States” ([27:15]). She underscores the legality of the president’s actions under the War Powers Act, asserting that Trump did not require congressional approval for targeted military strikes.

Malliotakis advocates for holding the impeaching members accountable, referencing past instances of expelling or censoring problematic Congress members. She emphasizes the importance of maintaining military integrity and condemning actions that undermine armed operations, particularly during critical missions ([30:27]).

Political Strategies and Future Projections

O’Reilly touches on the potential political repercussions of recent events, including the impact on future elections. He discusses the challenges within the New York political landscape, particularly concerning mayoral elections dominated by radical candidates. Malliotakis warns of significant economic and social fallout should such candidates prevail, predicting capital flight and declining public safety ([33:30]).

The conversation also touches upon the broader implications of isolationist policies, with O’Reilly highlighting historical failures of isolationism and the necessity for a globally engaged America to prevent chaos and maintain economic stability ([19:17]).

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

As the episode concludes, O’Reilly reiterates the critical nature of holding Congress members accountable for actions that undermine military operations and national security. He emphasizes the need for bipartisan support in addressing these challenges and ensuring that America maintains its stance against totalitarian regimes. The episode wraps up with final remarks on the importance of proactive congressional measures and the ongoing struggle between interventionist and isolationist philosophies within the Republican Party.

Notable Quotes:

• Bernard Goldberg [00:29]: “I come to my conclusions based on facts. So sometimes I agree with Donald Trump, sometimes I don't. In this case, I'm totally with President Trump.”

• Bernard Goldberg [02:06]: “But against that risk, Bill, you have to weigh the risk of a country run by zealot Islamist clerics having a nuclear weapon.”

• Eric Bolling [13:54]: “If it goes no further, Bill, I'm absolutely for it and I think it's going to go no further because Air Force One, Marine One, and saying Israel and Iran, they don't know what they're doing.”

• Nicole Malliotakis [27:15]: “I mean, whose side are they on? It really begs the question, what is their intention in being in Congress when they don't want to see us being successful in this mission?”

• Nicole Malliotakis [33:30]: “Well, you'll see capital flee. You'll see residents flee. You will see law enforcement flee.”

This detailed summary encapsulates the key discussions and viewpoints presented in the episode, providing a comprehensive overview for those who have not listened to the broadcast.