Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis: Weekend Edition - June 7, 2025

Release Date: June 7, 2025

Introduction

In this episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly, alongside co-host Victor Davis Hanson, delves into pressing national issues, including U.S.-China relations, the state of higher education, election integrity, and the fluctuating approval ratings of former President Donald Trump. The episode features an in-depth interview with Cleta Mitchell from the Election Integrity Network and analysis from polling expert John McLaughlin. The discussion is enriched with expert insights, candid opinions, and timely conclusions aimed at providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of current events.

1. U.S.-China Relations and National Security

Timestamp: [01:07] – [07:13]

Bill O’Reilly opens the discussion by addressing the prevalent use of outdated references and highlights the widespread acceptance of Discover credit cards as a segue into the episode's substantive topics.

Victor Davis Hanson initiates a conversation on the recent announcement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio regarding the deportation of some Chinese students, labeling it a "big mistake." He emphasizes the importance of respectful diplomacy, stating, “You don't insult your adversary, just, just like you don't insult Putin, okay? That gets you nowhere.” ([01:07]).

The discussion shifts to an incident at MIT involving Megha Vermore, a senior student leader who criticized Israel, leading to significant backlash. Hanson criticizes MIT’s handling of the situation, asserting that the institution "would never tolerate a genocide" but criticizes its response to perceived radical left influences on campus.

Hanson recounts his experience with a seminar at Stanford, describing the predominantly male and Maoist sympathizing attendees, and highlights the intellectual rigor of the lone articulate woman present. He critiques the left-leaning bias within prestigious educational institutions and underscores the challenges faced when confronting extremist ideologies.

2. Attacks on Universities and Left-Wing Indoctrination

Timestamp: [07:13] – [15:45]

The conversation intensifies as Hanson and O’Reilly discuss the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle what they perceive as progressive indoctrination in top-tier universities like Harvard and Stanford. Hanson elaborates on the economic and ideological pressures these institutions face, including significant financial contributions from the Chinese government and resultant political compromises.

Hanson asserts, “They charge 110% for foreign students. They've got a third of the student body.” ([07:13]), highlighting the financial dependencies that influence university policies and stifle conservative viewpoints.

O’Reilly and Hanson critique the progressive dominance in academia, noting the lack of conservative faculty and the pervasive anti-Semitism identified in Stanford’s internal reports. They argue that these institutions prioritize political correctness and leftist ideologies over academic freedom and meritocracy.

3. Interview with Cleta Mitchell on Election Integrity Network

Timestamp: [17:47] – [29:09]

The episode features an in-depth interview with Cleta Mitchell, founder and chairman of the Election Integrity Network. Mitchell recounts her involvement in the post-2020 election efforts to contest the results in Georgia, detailing the legal challenges and personal repercussions she faced.

Mitchell describes how, after volunteering her expertise, she filed a substantial election contest case in Georgia, only to face significant backlash from left-leaning organizations like the Lincoln Project. She states, “Once that transcript was released by the Washington Post, within 24 hours, the Lincoln Project... started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices...” ([25:08]).

She further explains the targeted attacks on her professional reputation, including a flood of bar complaints orchestrated by David Brock’s 65 Project, aimed at discrediting lawyers who supported Trump. Mitchell emphasizes the lack of media coverage on these retaliatory measures, highlighting a one-sided narrative that portrays her negatively without acknowledging the external pressures and threats she endured.

Hanson sympathizes with Mitchell’s experiences, noting, “I know the horror, Cleta. You know me. For a long time. I've been through this time and time and time again.” ([25:25]).

Mitchell concludes by affirming her continued commitment to election integrity, despite the personal and professional costs, stating, “They thought they vanquished me, but they made you stronger.” ([28:49]).

4. Polling Analysis and Trump's Approval Ratings

Timestamp: [29:13] – [38:01]

Transitioning from election integrity, the discussion turns to recent polling data concerning Donald Trump’s approval ratings. Co-host John McLaughlin, a polling expert affiliated with Trump, provides analysis on the divergent results from different polling organizations.

McLaughlin contrasts the Trafalgar poll, which shows a favorable approval rating of 54% for Trump, with the Atlas poll from Brazil indicating a 45% approval and 54% disapproval ([34:04]). He explains discrepancies by differentiating between likely voters and the general adult population, emphasizing that sampling methodologies significantly impact poll outcomes.

Hanson and McLaughlin dissect the implications of these polls, discussing the impact of tariffs and tax cuts on voter sentiment. McLaughlin underscores the importance of passing Trump’s tax cuts, noting, “If we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” ([34:57]).

The conversation also covers the anticipated political strategies leading up to the midterm elections. Hanson expresses confidence in Trump’s ability to negotiate tax cuts despite potential Senate modifications, while critiquing Democratic opposition. They highlight that economic factors, such as tax policies and their effects on everyday costs, will be pivotal in shaping voter behavior.

Hanson asserts, “If we don't pass the Trump tax cut, have a growing economy and we lose control of the House in the midterms, then we've got a big problem...” ([34:57]).

The episode concludes with McLaughlin urging listeners to focus on "hard numbers" rather than media-driven propaganda, reinforcing the episode’s theme of seeking unfiltered, factual analysis.

Conclusion

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis delivers a comprehensive examination of current geopolitical tensions, the internal struggles within American higher education, the contentious landscape of election integrity efforts, and the fluctuating public perception of Donald Trump. Through expert interviews and data-driven discussions, the episode emphasizes the importance of unbiased information and critical analysis in understanding and navigating the complex socio-political environment.

For more insights and detailed analysis, listeners are encouraged to visit BillOReilly.com and explore premium content offerings.

Notable Quotes:

• “You don't insult your adversary, just, just like you don't insult Putin, okay? That gets you nowhere.” – Victor Davis Hanson ([01:07])

• “They charge 110% for foreign students. They've got a third of the student body.” – Victor Davis Hanson ([07:13])

• “They started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices...” – Cleta Mitchell ([25:08])

• “If we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” – John McLaughlin ([34:57])

Key Takeaways:

• Geopolitical Tensions: The U.S.'s approach to China remains strained due to perceived aggression and lack of reciprocity, with educational institutions playing a controversial role in fostering left-leaning ideologies.

• Educational Institutions: Top universities are criticized for progressive indoctrination, financial dependencies on foreign governments, and intolerance towards conservative viewpoints.

• Election Integrity: Efforts to contest the 2020 election results have led to significant personal and professional repercussions for involved individuals, with systemic attempts to discredit supporters.

• Polling Discrepancies: Varied polling methodologies result in divergent approval ratings for Donald Trump, highlighting the influence of sampling techniques on public perception.

• Economic Policies: Trump’s focus on tax cuts and tariffs is deemed crucial in influencing voter behavior, with upcoming midterm elections hinging on economic outcomes and policy implementations.

This detailed summary encapsulates the multifaceted discussions from the No Spin News Weekend Edition, providing listeners with a clear and comprehensive overview of the episode's key themes and insights.