No Spin News - Weekend Edition - June 7, 2025

Summary

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis: Weekend Edition - June 7, 2025

Release Date: June 7, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis, host Bill O’Reilly, alongside co-host Victor Davis Hanson, delves into pressing national issues, including U.S.-China relations, the state of higher education, election integrity, and the fluctuating approval ratings of former President Donald Trump. The episode features an in-depth interview with Cleta Mitchell from the Election Integrity Network and analysis from polling expert John McLaughlin. The discussion is enriched with expert insights, candid opinions, and timely conclusions aimed at providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of current events.

---

1. U.S.-China Relations and National Security

Timestamp: [01:07] – [07:13]

Bill O’Reilly opens the discussion by addressing the prevalent use of outdated references and highlights the widespread acceptance of Discover credit cards as a segue into the episode's substantive topics.

Victor Davis Hanson initiates a conversation on the recent announcement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio regarding the deportation of some Chinese students, labeling it a "big mistake." He emphasizes the importance of respectful diplomacy, stating, “You don't insult your adversary, just, just like you don't insult Putin, okay? That gets you nowhere.” ([01:07]).

The discussion shifts to an incident at MIT involving Megha Vermore, a senior student leader who criticized Israel, leading to significant backlash. Hanson criticizes MIT’s handling of the situation, asserting that the institution "would never tolerate a genocide" but criticizes its response to perceived radical left influences on campus.

Hanson recounts his experience with a seminar at Stanford, describing the predominantly male and Maoist sympathizing attendees, and highlights the intellectual rigor of the lone articulate woman present. He critiques the left-leaning bias within prestigious educational institutions and underscores the challenges faced when confronting extremist ideologies.

---

2. Attacks on Universities and Left-Wing Indoctrination

Timestamp: [07:13] – [15:45]

The conversation intensifies as Hanson and O’Reilly discuss the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle what they perceive as progressive indoctrination in top-tier universities like Harvard and Stanford. Hanson elaborates on the economic and ideological pressures these institutions face, including significant financial contributions from the Chinese government and resultant political compromises.

Hanson asserts, “They charge 110% for foreign students. They've got a third of the student body.” ([07:13]), highlighting the financial dependencies that influence university policies and stifle conservative viewpoints.

O’Reilly and Hanson critique the progressive dominance in academia, noting the lack of conservative faculty and the pervasive anti-Semitism identified in Stanford’s internal reports. They argue that these institutions prioritize political correctness and leftist ideologies over academic freedom and meritocracy.

---

3. Interview with Cleta Mitchell on Election Integrity Network

Timestamp: [17:47] – [29:09]

The episode features an in-depth interview with Cleta Mitchell, founder and chairman of the Election Integrity Network. Mitchell recounts her involvement in the post-2020 election efforts to contest the results in Georgia, detailing the legal challenges and personal repercussions she faced.

Mitchell describes how, after volunteering her expertise, she filed a substantial election contest case in Georgia, only to face significant backlash from left-leaning organizations like the Lincoln Project. She states, “Once that transcript was released by the Washington Post, within 24 hours, the Lincoln Project... started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices...” ([25:08]).

She further explains the targeted attacks on her professional reputation, including a flood of bar complaints orchestrated by David Brock’s 65 Project, aimed at discrediting lawyers who supported Trump. Mitchell emphasizes the lack of media coverage on these retaliatory measures, highlighting a one-sided narrative that portrays her negatively without acknowledging the external pressures and threats she endured.

Hanson sympathizes with Mitchell’s experiences, noting, “I know the horror, Cleta. You know me. For a long time. I've been through this time and time and time again.” ([25:25]).

Mitchell concludes by affirming her continued commitment to election integrity, despite the personal and professional costs, stating, “They thought they vanquished me, but they made you stronger.” ([28:49]).

---

4. Polling Analysis and Trump's Approval Ratings

Timestamp: [29:13] – [38:01]

Transitioning from election integrity, the discussion turns to recent polling data concerning Donald Trump’s approval ratings. Co-host John McLaughlin, a polling expert affiliated with Trump, provides analysis on the divergent results from different polling organizations.

McLaughlin contrasts the Trafalgar poll, which shows a favorable approval rating of 54% for Trump, with the Atlas poll from Brazil indicating a 45% approval and 54% disapproval ([34:04]). He explains discrepancies by differentiating between likely voters and the general adult population, emphasizing that sampling methodologies significantly impact poll outcomes.

Hanson and McLaughlin dissect the implications of these polls, discussing the impact of tariffs and tax cuts on voter sentiment. McLaughlin underscores the importance of passing Trump’s tax cuts, noting, “If we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” ([34:57]).

The conversation also covers the anticipated political strategies leading up to the midterm elections. Hanson expresses confidence in Trump’s ability to negotiate tax cuts despite potential Senate modifications, while critiquing Democratic opposition. They highlight that economic factors, such as tax policies and their effects on everyday costs, will be pivotal in shaping voter behavior.

Hanson asserts, “If we don't pass the Trump tax cut, have a growing economy and we lose control of the House in the midterms, then we've got a big problem...” ([34:57]).

The episode concludes with McLaughlin urging listeners to focus on "hard numbers" rather than media-driven propaganda, reinforcing the episode’s theme of seeking unfiltered, factual analysis.

---

Conclusion

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis delivers a comprehensive examination of current geopolitical tensions, the internal struggles within American higher education, the contentious landscape of election integrity efforts, and the fluctuating public perception of Donald Trump. Through expert interviews and data-driven discussions, the episode emphasizes the importance of unbiased information and critical analysis in understanding and navigating the complex socio-political environment.

For more insights and detailed analysis, listeners are encouraged to visit BillOReilly.com and explore premium content offerings.

---

Notable Quotes:

• “You don't insult your adversary, just, just like you don't insult Putin, okay? That gets you nowhere.” – Victor Davis Hanson ([01:07])

• “They charge 110% for foreign students. They've got a third of the student body.” – Victor Davis Hanson ([07:13])

• “They started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices...” – Cleta Mitchell ([25:08])

• “If we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this.” – John McLaughlin ([34:57])

---

Key Takeaways:

• Geopolitical Tensions: The U.S.'s approach to China remains strained due to perceived aggression and lack of reciprocity, with educational institutions playing a controversial role in fostering left-leaning ideologies.

• Educational Institutions: Top universities are criticized for progressive indoctrination, financial dependencies on foreign governments, and intolerance towards conservative viewpoints.

• Election Integrity: Efforts to contest the 2020 election results have led to significant personal and professional repercussions for involved individuals, with systemic attempts to discredit supporters.

• Polling Discrepancies: Varied polling methodologies result in divergent approval ratings for Donald Trump, highlighting the influence of sampling techniques on public perception.

• Economic Policies: Trump’s focus on tax cuts and tariffs is deemed crucial in influencing voter behavior, with upcoming midterm elections hinging on economic outcomes and policy implementations.

---

This detailed summary encapsulates the multifaceted discussions from the No Spin News Weekend Edition, providing listeners with a clear and comprehensive overview of the episode's key themes and insights.

Transcript

[Bill O'Reilly]

Are you still quoting 30 year old movies? Have you said cool beans in the past 90 days? Do you think Discover isn't widely accepted? If this sounds like you, you're stuck in the past. Discover is accepted at 99% of places that take credit cards nationwide. And every time you make a purchase with your card, you automatically earn cash back. Welcome to the now it pays to Discover. Learn [e-mail] credit card Based on the February 2024 Nielsen report, Ryan Reynolds here.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

From Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop with Mint. You can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But that's weird.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay, one judgment anyway.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Give it a try. @mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only, then full price plan options available taxes and see full terms@mint mobile.com welcome to the no Spin News Weekend Edition.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

The day after I left, there was an announcement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that some Chinese students would be deported. Big mistake. I haven't heard much about it, so maybe they're pulling back. You don't insult your adversary, just, just like you don't insult Putin, okay? That gets you nowhere. If you want peace, okay, that's not helpful in the big picture. And then at mit, there was a nut, Megha Vermore, who gave the president of senior class mit, and then she gets up there and bashes Israel. Roll tape. Last spring, MIT's Undergraduate Body and graduate student union voted overwhelmingly to cut ties with the genocidal Israeli military. You called for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and you stood in solidarity with the pro Palestine activists on campus. You faced threats, intimidation and suppression coming from all directions, especially your own university officials. But you prevailed because the MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide, all right, you know, radical left people, genocide, blah, blah, blah. MIT is not letting her graduate with everybody else and they're trying to punish her like that, but they had to know she was going to do that because she's a known radical. Jonas now is a guy I personally requested to analyze my utterings about China because I think he's one of the smartest guys in the country and he's an honest man as well. He's Victor Davis Hansen. You know him. He's a syndicated columnist. He works at the Hoover Institution, which is on a, on the campus of Stanford University. Right, professor, that's where you're Hoover is, right? Okay. So you know, you know the. And there are tons. One of the. There was only one woman in the. And these were hard men, by the way, in the, on in the room where I gave the seminar. About 14 of them, 13 men. One woman who was a Stanford grad, very articulate woman, powerful woman. The other guy, she, she put the other guys to shame because she understood a little bit about the flow in and out of the USA where the. A lot of them didn't. They really, you know, they were very hardcore Maoists. Anyway, you've read my column, you listen to my bloviating here. What say you?

[Jonas]

Well, I think China has a. If you compare the cold. If we were in a cold war and a lot of people think we are, and you compare that to the Soviet Union 50 years, China has a, a very different place in the relationship of the United States. We had no Soviet students here. We had no trade agreements. It was a cold war. But I would like to see more of a normalization of what I think is kind of an aberrant. We have 300,000 students at Stanford. We just have a series of Stanford Review articles revealing that there was an organized espionage group of students. We had a member of the People's Liberation army on the faculty as a visiting neuroscientist. About four years ago, the Confucius Institute was shut down. The devos a first term Trump Department of Education fined Stanford for not reporting a lot of contributions. So it's a. It. I guess what I'm saying, Bill, is that the view of George H.W. bush and, and Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and to a lesser extent, to a greater extent, Obama, that the more engagement you have with China, they were going to be impressed with American culture, tolerance and they were going to become emulate us. And then they would.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

That's not happening.

[Jonas]

No, it's not happening. It's not happening. So I think the Trump position was that we had given them a sense of appeasement or laxity and our magnanimity was reciprocated by aggression taking advantages of rather than reciprocity. And I think right now we're in a period where when you look at China, they're building three or four nuclear warheads a month and they plan to get up to about 1200 in five years. They run, they have violated that. We don't have much success with them on copyrights, patents, dumping the product, currency manipulation. I would like to think that maybe Hong Kong would have been an example for Taiwan. But when you look what's happened to Hong Kong, Johnny Lai, Jimmy Lai is in prison. And they pretty much suppress free speech. So I guess what I'm saying is because of World War II, and we have a large Chinese population here, there was a natural empathy for closer relationships. And it wasn't the Cold War, Truman, Eisenhower, Cold War. There was a. There was a real opportunity, the Americans thought, to reach out to China and to give them indulgences that we didn't. Other countries that we had been.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Yeah, it worked for a little while. It worked for a little while, but then she got in and she is, you know, it's. She's personal legacy is tied in with Taiwan. Do you believe I said that? I came up with this Partnership for Prosperity and Peace. And the reason that I did is because China has to feed 1.5 billion. They're hurting, okay. Their economy needs the United States. That is the big leverage we have over them. And they are willing to make a deal, I believe. Do you believe that?

[Jonas]

I think they're willing to make a deal in the economic realm because they're suffering. Kind of a historic phenomenon, that the more they have upward mobility rather than the population being satisfied. It's just a human trait, human nature. They're even more ambitious for a better life. And it's very hard to fulfill the expectations of the Chinese growing middle class because they're not spending what they should on domestic.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

It's all military stuff.

[Jonas]

Yeah, it's all military.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

There's Spartans over there. But what I saw, I tested them a couple of times. I said, you're not going to get anywhere with Trump because it was all Trump centric. You know, you gave a very logical and good historical analysis. That's not what they're interested in. There isn't Trump. Okay? And I said, the first thing you have to do is knock out the fentanyl, okay? And you know, you have to knock it out. And they go, well, we are. But the precursor. I said, I don't want to hear precursor. And remember that this was translated. You know, they had the little things. And because half the room spoke English, half didn't. But the instant translation, I said, I want to hear precursor. You don't need fentanyl. You don't need any of it. Knock it out. Give President Trump that. That's where you start. You don't need to be in bed with Putin. And I warned them about Putin. I said, you can try to be his friend, but he'll turn on you like A snake. You don't need to be cutting up to the Mullers, okay. United States will supply your energy needs in a much more benign way. They could not answer any of those things, Professor. None. And I just laid it out. I said, you're going to. If you're going to consort with bad guys, evil guys, and that's what the label you're going to get, why do you need it? You don't need it. Doesn't help you. And that was the thrust of the 90 minutes.

[Jonas]

Yeah, I think the trumpet, and I can't speak for them, but. And you know them better than I do, but I think they're. They're in this narrow Soviet, Russia, China, American relationship. They're trying to have a Kissinger paradigm where China is no better friend to Russia than it is to us. Russia is no better friend or enemy whatever to China than it is to us. And triangulate and check power because they have historic animosities, China and Russia.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Oh, yeah.

[Jonas]

For some reason, the Ukrainian. I think we're in a period of a real problem because they are in alignment. But it's going to be very hard for any Chinese Communist leader as it is for Putin in a dictatorial. But even more so, I think, when you have an idea totalitarian ideology, Putin is kind of like a dictator that makes it up as he goes along ideologically. But whether it's Iran that is ideological and totalitarian, or China, it's very hard for those leaders to compromise their ideology because they have a whole group of people surrounding them that don't respond to the same incentives as either Western democracies or dictatorships where they.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

I'll tell you what, there wasn't a lot of love for Putin or Iran in that room. They don't care about the Ukraine, the Chinese, and they don't care about it. Okay, but there wasn't a lot of love. All right, let's pivot to the attack by the Trump administration on the universities. We all know the indoctrination across the country at Harvard, at Stanford, you know, the finest educational institutes have basically set themselves up as progressive left institutions. And that's what Trump is trying to break down, and he's using a hammer to do it. Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress, national debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401 tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five star reviews and an A plus from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998-899. Again that's 866-326-5576, or text BILL to 9988.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI automation and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SoC2 or ISO 27001 or a growing enterprise managing vendor risk, Vanta makes it quick, easy and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here. Get [e-mail] can you predict the outcome?

[Jonas]

Yeah, I think they're going to have to cut a deal with them. It's analogous bill to illegal immigration. The left keeps saying that there's no criminals here, we don't have a problem. Then almost every day we have an illegal immigrant that kills somebody or as we saw in Colorado commits a terrorist act. The universities have so many things that are so antithetical to the public. And I just for years, Stanford, Harvard, they had been charging the federal government anywhere from 45 to 55% surcharges on individual grants. That was about $190 million in annual income from Stanford. Now they got to go down to 15%. For years they have defied the last three years of supreme Court decision on the end of affirmative action and basically racial preference. They have, but they have self righteous euphemism. So we call it auxiliary graduations, a theme house. But basically they're segregated dorms, segregated by race. Graduation ceremonies. If you are accused of sexual harassment, they do not give you. And that was title nine. That came from the Obama administration where they said you will not give them beyond reasonable a doubt or you're going to lose federal funds so the defendant can't face his accuser. They know that that's a violation of the Constitution. They also know that the Chinese government and especially gutter have been giving them aggregate $50 billion. And that has really affected our foreign policy because for a generation now people coming out of these graduate programs have taken classes, they've experienced professors that were subsidized by these two governments. And so I could go on, but there's a lot of anti. Semitism is endemic at Stanford. We had a 900 page report by Liberal professors. It was one of the most damning documents I've ever seen. So they don't want to get in a fight with Trump because they have so much exposure, that culpability. They charge 110% for foreign students. They've got a third of the student body.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Yeah, it's all about money, but the ideology, they won't even pull back at Harvard. They acknowledge that 80% of the hires are progressives. Maybe there's five conservative teachers. They won't even acknowledge that's wrong. And yeah, so I'm, I'm basically hoping that, you know, Trump is going to.

[Jonas]

Win all the cards. Yeah, Trump has all the cards. A recent Gallup poll said public support was 65% confidence in higher education, but.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Driving the media nuts. Oh, they hate it.

[Jonas]

Down. It's down to 30%. And Trump has. He's looking at taxing the endowment income.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Oh, yeah, he's going to go everywhere. That's.

[Jonas]

They're going to have to. Yeah, they're going to have to cut a deal with him. I think he'll win. He'll, he'll win that I think.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

And I think that if she and Trump get in the building together that they'll, they'll cut some deals there, too. Thank you, Professor. We really appreciate your expertise and thanks for putting up with me.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You're listening to the no Spa News weekend edition.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay. Headline, front page, Wall Street Journal. Now, you have to understand something. If you are interested in consuming news in America, I assume you are, since you're consuming me right now on radio and television. So Wall Street Journal in their news pages is a left wing situation in their editorial pages. They are not. They are. They lean right on the editorial side, but they lean left on their news coverage. The headline today is law firms that appease Trump face backlash. Okay. The article is that if a law firm settles with the president, that it's being punished. Some of its lawyers quit, some people won't do business with it, whatever. There is only one pro Trump lawyer mentioned in the entire article. Okay? 1. And a lot of lawyers who have helped or worked or support Donald Trump have gotten hurt big time. So therefore, the Wall Street Journal tilts it, okay, Left saying, no, don't settle with Trump because you'll get hurt. But they ignore the fact that the same thing is going on by the left, punishing Any attorneys who support Donald Trump. And joining us now is one of them. Cleta Mitchell comes from Pinehurst, North Carolina today. She is the founder and chairman of, of the Election Integrity Network. So you, after the election of 2020, were involved with Georgia and the controversy down there about whether the votes were counted accurately and you got hurt doing that, correct? Tell us what happened to you.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, thank you, Bill, for having me and letting me talk about this, because it's only been one side that's been told for the last 40 years and that's by the left wing media, including the Wall Street Journal news pages. As you pointed out, I was a partner at a large law firm in Washington, D.C. for almost 20 years. And when after I was asked by the White House to go to Georgia the day after the election. So November 4th of 2020, I am an election attorney, practice campaign finance and election law for many years. And so I was asked to go to Georgia and just to see what was going on and to just check out the election situation. And so I arrived there in the wee hours of the 5th of November and I started looking at what had gone on in the election and realized that the election was a mess. And I will just say that's not a legal term of art. It's just exactly, but it is exactly what happened. So many votes that were cast and counted in violation of state law, people registered at PO Boxes, that's illegal in Georgia, people whose registrations were recorded as having been what the post office record showed were vacant premises, either vacant lots or nobody lived there. And adding all of that up, basically we knew that there were more votes that were cast and counted and were included in the certified total than the margin of victory between President Trump and Joe Biden. So I was one of the president's volunteer lawyers. And that was interesting in and of itself because, because there had been this real push from the left, just like what we're what you were reading today, where there was this big leftist push the day starting the day after the election where law firms were threatened and told that people would take their business away from law firms who represented President Trump in the post election of 2020. So let's start with that. And so here I am, a partner in a big law firm and I'm volunteering because my firm decided not to accept payment because they didn't want to basically telegraph to the outside world that we were doing anything on behalf of the president. And so fast forward, we filed an election contest, 64 pages, over 1100 pages of exhibits. And we Never got a judge appointed to hear the case, which was very odd. We could talk about that on a separate podcast. But the bottom line is that we ended up, the President wanted to have a conversation with the Secretary of State because we hadn't had a judge appointed, and to see if there might be some way to resolve the case by comparing the data that was included in our litigation with the data that the Secretary of State said that he had in his office that he wouldn't share with us. And so to try to get some resolution before the certification.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay, let me start. Electoral votes, they never got it. And you believe that there was illegalities involved in the total. I think you believe that Trump won the state. Is that correct?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Well, in all honesty, Bill, and I've said this to the President, I don't think we know who won.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay. And that's absolutely valid. And there you go. But there are enough questions whereby it should have been qualified. And it was. Okay, so you did. Following the law, you did an honest job. Your law firm. Do you want to mention a law firm? Name the law firm?

[Cleta Mitchell]

I'd rather not.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Rather not.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

So you're down there in your own dime, you do an honest job, you come back to D.C. and they fire you.

[Cleta Mitchell]

No, what happened was that the Secretary of State, in a phone call that was arranged to discuss the data that was in our lawsuit with the Secretary of State, that phone call was illegally recorded by the Deputy Secretary of State, a woman by the name of Jordan Fuchsia, and she was in Florida at the time. She lied about it to the Washington Post, by the way, because Florida is a two party consent state. You're not supposed to record the phone call unless you have the consent of the other people on the call.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Right.

[Cleta Mitchell]

And she did not obtain that. She recorded the call, then released the tape to the Washington Post the next day. And so that phone call, the President has been quoted in that phone call as saying, we just need to find 12,000 votes. As though he was asking the Secretary of State to go find votes.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

No, no, he was just clarifying how many votes were needed to overturn the state. Look, any honest broker knows that. But I'm interested in you. I'm interested in you now.

[Cleta Mitchell]

So once, once that transcript was released by the Washington Post, within 24 hours, the Lincoln Project, which is, you know, is run by a bunch of never Trumpers perverted people, they started posting on Twitter the phone numbers of our offices, the firm's offices. We had offices all over the country and telling people to start and Then listing some of our major corporate clients, which is a matter of public record, and having people call the corporate clients to tell the corporate clients to call their relationship partner to tell the partners that they were going to take their business away from our law firm unless the firm fired me.

[Bill O'Reilly]

This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords, and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it, and they might not be as careful. That's why LifeLock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off terms. Apply.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Grandpa's here.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Hank's always helping out, grandpa style. Now he's treating his prostate cancer with help from Xtandi and zalutamide. Xtandi, 40mg tablets, treats men with prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and responds to a medical or or surgical treatment to lower testosterone. Xtandi may cause serious side seizure, a brain condition called press allergic reactions, heart disease that can lead to death, falls and bone fractures, swallowing problems or choking that can lead to death. Stop Xtandi and get medical help at once. If your face, tongue, lip or throat start swelling, tell your doctor at once. If you faint, have a seizure, quickly worsening headache, decreased alertness, confusion, vision problems, chest pain or discomfort or shortness of breath, Xtandi can cause harm to an unborn baby or miscarriage. Use birth control during and three months after Xtandi. Common side effects include muscle and joint pain, feeling unusually tired, hot flashes, constipation, less appetite, diarrhea, high blood pressure, bleeding, falls, fractures and headache. Talk to your doctor and visit xtandi.com.

[Cleta Mitchell]

You personally, literally shut down. Me personally?

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Okay, so they threaten your law firm. You better fire Cleta Mitchell or we're going to take our business elsewhere. Okay?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Correct.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Now?

[Cleta Mitchell]

Correct.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Did any media report that?

[Cleta Mitchell]

What they reported was that I was forced out of the firm. I ended up resigning from the firm. We reached an agreement. But what they've all reported for four years is that I was the attorney who tried to overturn the election in Georgia. Filing an election contest is not considered.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

They didn't report that you were threatened by the Lincoln Project. None of that was reported.

[Cleta Mitchell]

None of that was reported? No, no, no. We had to shut down the switchboards in all of our.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Look, I know the horror, Cleta. You know me. For a long time. I've been through this. I've been through this time and time and time again. Okay. And that's why I got out. That's why I got out.

[Cleta Mitchell]

Right.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

All right. Well, I'm just not going to deal with it anymore, honestly. Right.

[Cleta Mitchell]

I just said so. I left the law firm in January of 2021, and I haven't practiced law since then. But what I spent my time doing since February 1st of 2021, I've been the senior legal fellow at the Conservative Partnership Institute, and I founded the Election Integrity Network, and I've been working full time on election integrity. But every news article, Every news article refers to me as the lawyer who tried to help Trump overturn the election in 2020.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

And it's a smear.

[Cleta Mitchell]

The other thing. Yes. And then within about a month, just a few weeks later, I receive a bar complaint that was. I was originally admitted to the bar in Oklahoma. It's where I'm from. And I practiced law there before I moved to Washington, D.C. in the 1990s. And so I'm a member of the bar in Washington, D.C. and in Oklahoma. And so I had a bar complaint filed against me by 29 people, lawyers I, I'd never heard of. I'd never heard of.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

We're organized into a cabal. Let's get. Let's get Cleta Mitchell. Right, right. Okay.

[Cleta Mitchell]

And then what I learned then is that that began a trend, a project founded by David Brock, you may remember.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

I know David Brock, smear merchant.

[Cleta Mitchell]

So he finds some. He. He created something called the 65 Project. And they filed bar complaints against every lawyer in America who in any way, shape or form supported Trump. Supported President Trump.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Right. And that these projects are paid for by people like George Soros. I don't know if Soros directly paid this, but that's where the money comes from. Brock lives off that money and he makes a lot of money himself.

[Cleta Mitchell]

He makes a lot of money to destroy.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Destroy people like you. Right, right. All right, Cleta. And so we have it.

[Cleta Mitchell]

That bar complaint went on.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

What, the bar complaint Go anywhere real quick?

[Cleta Mitchell]

No, but they didn't dismiss it for three years. It was fully brief, but it wasn't dismissed for three years.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

So you had to deal with it and all of that. Well, we're sorry, of course, but I think you're better off now than you were and you're helping the country more now.

[Cleta Mitchell]

I always say. Yeah, I say that they, you know, they thought they vanquished me, but they made you stronger. They made Me. They freed me from billable hours so I could just spend full time working on trying to fix the election.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

And I'm very happy that this broadcast here could tell your story because that's the outrage. They just won't tell the truth. They be in the Washington Post of the world. They're not interested in that. All right, Cleta, good luck to you. If anybody ever bothers you again, you come right to me, okay?

[Cleta Mitchell]

I appreciate that, Bill.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Thank you.

[Bill O'Reilly]

This is the no Spin news, weekend.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Edition three new polls about President Trump versus Zoghb. Favorable to the president. 1,000 likely voters. Do you approve or disapprove? 48% approve of the job President Trump is doing. 49% disapprove. Split right down the middle. Trafalgar poll, pro Trump poll. Okay, 1098 likely general election voters. How do you feel about President Trump handling his job? Approve 54. Disapprove 46. That's a very strong number for the president. And the last one is Atlas. This is out of Brazil. But they were the most accurate pollsters in the election of 2024. 3469 adults. Big sample. Okay, do you approve or disprove job Donald Trump is doing? Approve 45, disapprove 54. So, you know, there's a big, it's almost exactly the opposite of Trafalgar. So joining us now is our go to guy on the polling. John McLaughlin's an honest man. He works for President Trump. I mean, got to let you know that he likes Trump, he likes his policies. He polls for Trump, but he's an honest man. All right, so can you explain to us the difference between Trafalgar and Atlas?

[John McLaughlin]

Yes. Well, first of all, it's the difference between likely voters and adults. And we just posted a poll that we did last week at the same time as the Atlas poll was in the field. And we polled 1,000 likely voters modeled after the 2024 election in demographics. And we had Trump's job approval of 51 and his disapproval was 44. And it's a big difference because in the election last year, you only had 155 million voters go to the polls. There was over 90 million more eligible adults who didn't show up at the polls. That there's polling. When you do in a poll, what.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Difference does that make? Shouldn't they have a right to put an opinion on Trump's performance?

[John McLaughlin]

Oh, they can have an opinion, but it's a poll of adults. It's not a poll of likely voters. So you get the disparity. And also when you go through the Atlas sample, they have a cross tab for voted Trump, voted Harris. But in their demographics, they don't tell you how many people that they polled voted for Harris and voted for Trump. And that's been the flaw. We know in our likely voter polls, we used our polling as a strategy to raise his popular vote so we could sweep the battleground states so he'd get 50% of the national vote and tariff is 48%. And that was our strategy. So it's not apples to apples. And when you look at Atlas, yeah, they were most accurate last year because they were, they, they were doing something that replicated actual likely voters.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Your gut affects everything, even your mood. So Ollie created two brand new products to take care of your insides. Ollie Big 10 Probiotic has 10 strains of probiotics, their most ever, to support a healthy gut, microbiome, immune system and stress response. And Ollie Super Good Superfoods delivers 15 superfoods in tasty gummy form. Find them at ollie.com and exclusively at Walmart. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

[John McLaughlin]

These polls that are coming out now, where you've got. I mean, the New York Times put out a poll. They had only had 37% trial Trump voters, the Washington Post, ABC had only 34.

[Jonas]

Yeah, I know.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

We don't even bother with them anymore because we know how corrupt it is. They have their thumb on the scale, to use a cliche. How do you think Donald Trump is doing, though? I mean, you're seeing numbers every day. It's obvious he was successful or is successful closing a border. Most people do support the ICE raids and getting that whole thing under control, but the tariff situation has roiled the American people and I think divided it. Would I be wrong in saying that?

[John McLaughlin]

Well, we have. Well, they don't grasp it as well as the tax cuts. In the national poll that we put up, 58% want them to. Want them to get the tax cuts passed. 20% secure the border, 7%, you know, lower the price of oil and gas, 7%, strength in national defense. But at the same time, we asked in the same poll, do you think the tariffs are hurt or have they helped? And 47% think they've helped. Right now, as of last week, only 38% said hurt. So the jury's still out on that. It's a much more complex issue, sure.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

But it really isn't. You Know why, John? Because what it's going to come down to, and this will clarify itself by November, I think, is whether people are paying more money for the essentials of life. That's what it's going to be. I mean, people don't have to understand who's paying it and where it's coming from. And this one's there, and that's steel here, and the cards are there, and agricultural. They're going to walk into the grocery store and they're going, I'm getting a break under Trump or I'm paying more under Trump. And that's what's going to decide it. Am I wrong?

[John McLaughlin]

You're exactly right. And that's why the tariffs issue is secondary and much, much less important than passing the tax cuts. Because if we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this. We know this for our polling, the tech. The Trump tax cuts lapse this year.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Yeah. And everybody pays more. There's no doubt about it. So it is a vital thing, and that's why Trump is behind it so hard. I think he's going to get it passed, but there's going to be some Senate modifications, and Trump will live with that. He knows he has to negotiate it. But the Democrats have downside, too, here, because if they vote en bloc not to pass it, then easily that anger when people's taxes go up can be transferred to the Democratic Party.

[John McLaughlin]

Right, Right. But hopefully the taxes never go up. But the Democrats, every Democrat in the Senate and the House is on record as voting against extending the tax cuts. So they're all voted for the largest tax increase in the history of America, and we've got to hold them accountable.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

We got to get crazy, and they. And they hide behind this ridiculous, oh, we just want to tax the rich. But it isn't that. It's everybody. And, you know, it's the same thing about Medicaid. Oh, they want to throw people off Medicaid. No, they want to regulate, they want to refine it. But anyway, political lies are, you know, they're never ending. Last question for you. I think President Trump would have been better if he had not done so much so fast. It would have been easier for him to convince the American people of why he's doing what he's doing. But because the change has been so massive, because the Biden administration was so horrible, that it all came at once, and it's almost too much for the average person who doesn't do what you and I do for a living to grasp it so they're more subjected to propaganda. So if he had just not done and just incrementally done it, I think he'd be in a stronger position. Do you agree?

[John McLaughlin]

You may be right. But it's hard to get him to do that. You know him personality wise. Yeah, I know Biden left the country in such a Mess. He has a 40 favorable 56 unfavorable outlast ball. The guy left such a mess that Trump, you know, he's got to solve wars in Ukraine, the Middle east, secure the border and try to get the economy to grow all at the same time. And you're dealing with a president now who has survived two assassination attempts after they tried to put him in jail. So if we don't get the Trump tax cut passed, have a growing economy and we lose control of the House in the midterms, then we've got a big problem because they'll impeach him again.

[Victor Davis Hanson]

Yeah, boss, for sure. I'm writing about that in my message today, tomorrow about the midterms and now how it's starting to shape up. So, John, look, if you see any trends, just do me a favor, let us know about the president, both pro and con, because I think our audience is very we're numbers people here. We don't want the propaganda. We want the hard numbers. And we really appreciate it. As always, thanks for helping us out.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Thank you for listening to the no Spin News Weekend Edition. To watch the full episodes of the no Spin news, visit bill o'reilly.com and sign up to become a premium or concierge member. That's Bill O'Reilly.com sign up and start watching today.