
Loading summary
Bill O'Reilly
Mike and Alyssa are always trying to outdo each other. When Alyssa got a small water bottle, Mike showed up with a 4 liter jug. When Mike started gardening, Alyssa started beekeeping.
Oh, come on.
They called a truce for their holiday and used Expedia trip planner to collaborate on all the details of their trip. Once there, Mike still did more laps around the pool.
Whatever.
You were made to outdo your holidays. We were made to help organize the competition. Expedia Made to travel.
Leland Vittert
Recently we asked some people about sharing their New York Times accounts.
Dana
My name is Dana. I am a subscriber to the New York Times, but my husband isn't. And it would be really nice to be able to share a recipe or an article or compete with him in wordle or connections.
Leland Vittert
Thank you, Dana.
Bill O'Reilly
We heard you introducing the New York Times family subscription. One subscription, up to four separate logins for anyone in your life. Find out more@nytimes.com family.
Welcome to the no Spin News Weekend Edition.
I'm not at the level of Erica Kirk. I have a hard time with this and I'm going to play a sound bite from the President in a moment. Who? He and I are on the same wavelength here. I have a very hard time forgiving evil unless there's repentance. So in my book Confronting Evil, none of the 15 miscreants ever showed any sign of remorse for their horrible, horrible deeds. I don't know about this guy in Utah. You know, we don't have access to him, but after he shot and killed Charlie Kirk, there was no thread go, what did I do? Or anything like that. I have a hard time. I've talked about this to Catholic theologians at a very high level. I said, look, I'm supposed to forgive Hitler, I'm supposed to forgive Mao, I'm supposed to forgive Stalin, the slavers, the robber barons, the assassins, Lee Harvey Odwald. And they don't repent. There's no I'm sorry. If you're a Christian and somebody asks you for forgiveness and I'm sorry, you have to forgive them or you have to resign, because that's the theology. But if they don't and they continue their evil ways, and the only reason that this assassin can't do more damage is because he's incarcerated, what do you do? So, but again, I am not as benevolent a person as Erica Kirk. So then the President picked up on that and now his speech was written for him, as almost every President does. But he ad libbed this part. Roll the tape.
Donald Trump
In that private moment on his dying day, we find everything we need to know about who Charlie Kirk truly was. He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose. He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry, Erica. But now Erica can talk to me and the whole group, and maybe they can convince me that that's the. But I can't stand my opponent.
Bill O'Reilly
Well, he's an honest guy anyway, you know, and again, I got a list. You know, I got a list. And boy, and I know that Donald Trump, you know, people try to destroy him and his family very, very hard. But that goes back to Mrs. Kirk. The president then picked up on the legacy. What does this all mean for the country? Roll it.
Donald Trump
We owe Charlie a profound and eternal debt of gratitude. Now, just like Charlie and Erica made Turning Point hot, we are looking at a country that has the chance to attain a level like never before. Tariffs are making us rich again, richer than anybody ever thought was possible. And the only one challenging them are people that hate our country or foreign countries that are paying a price because they did the same thing to us for years. They took advantage of us.
Bill O'Reilly
Well, it's negatively political, and again, some people objected, but I'm saying, okay, I understand the objection, but it's perfectly in context to what Charlie Kirk did. And he lost his life because he spoke out on policy. So Mr. Kirk was killed because of his political point of view. And so when you have a president there, knows the world is listening, he's going to reinforce that point of view because he knows that everybody in the arena is on his side. And Charlie Kirk's side. Would I have done it probably a little differently, but it was not out of context, as some people are saying, in my opinion. So, again, the legacy will be the conservative Christian movement will become more powerful, particularly because Erica Kirk is now in charge and extraordinary woman, that's for sure. And that's the memo. Let's bring in a guy who saw it all. He was there. Leland Vitter is an anchorman on News Nation, and he was the chief anchorman for that network covering the memorial. You're. You must have seen some things that you weren't expecting.
Leland Vittert
Yeah, for sure, for sure, Bill. And, you know, your producer emailed me for this hit and said that you wanted to discuss the stuff I picked up on that folks at home didn't get to see. The number one thing that folks at home didn't get to see that we saw was as President Trump became nakedly political, and as he said, I hate my opponents. And on and on and on. People started walking out and not a few. Tonight, on my program on News Nation, I will show you the video of the stands emptying as Trump went on and turned this in to a rally speech. And I think what it shows is that for as much as President Trump understands his crowd. And look, following Erica Kirk was unbelievably.
Kaylin Deese
Hard.
Leland Vittert
But he just did not understand the moment.
Bill O'Reilly
How many. So there were what, 70,000 inside by.
Leland Vittert
The end, by the end of Trump's speech, it was less than half full, maybe even a third full. It was. It was a stunning rebuke of President Trump. And I think you have to realize that stadium was filled for Charlie Kirk. Donald Trump's done a lot of things. He has never filled a football stadium with overflow, and Charlie Kirk did. And I think this brings us to understanding the difference between Turning Point USA and the organization that Charlie Kirk created and what they believe in and the politics of Donald Trump. Now, you can say very easily, well, look, Trump's just incapable of not being the center of attention, of not being the most important person in the room. That may be something to it, but there was a squandering, I think, by President Trump of the moment in just not understanding what the crowd needed at that time.
Bill O'Reilly
Do you think he got it back afterward with the embrace of Erica Kirk and the sympathy that he showed to her? And the second question I would have would be, if you have a memorial based upon a man who was assassinated because of his political beliefs, shouldn't those beliefs be highlighted? See, that's why I didn't have any problem with. With what Donald Trump was saying. I wouldn't. I would have said a little bit differently. I wish I had written a speech, but I didn't have any trouble, because that's the essence of this whole thing, that Charlie Kirk lost his life because he espoused certain things and they're compatible with President Trump.
Leland Vittert
Well, a couple of things to that. One, Charlie Kirk was the first person who was able to merge politics and faith. So many had tried to turn a faith movement into a political movement, and in America, he did it. And I'm not an analyst or a partisan or a guy with opinions. I'm a journalist. And I don't think it really matters whether people think they should be able to or it makes sense or the views were compatible. The crowd spoke with their feet. When Donald Trump did that. He lost the audience. And I had folks calling me at home saying what is going on here? And the idea, I think that Erica Kirk gave that speech. You had that moment and you said something else you couldn't pick up on when she said that I forgive, I forgive my husband's assassin. I've never been in a room, a room, a football stadium that you felt the emotion, the physical response of I sort of wanted to throw up, I sort of wanted to cry, I had admiration. I'm still emotional thinking about that moment and the fact that then Donald Trump walks out and goes, hey, Lee Green won. Nobody can sing it like you.
Bill O'Reilly
Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress, national debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401, tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered. Thousands of 5 star reviews and an A plus from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998-899 again that's 866-326-5576, or text BILL to 9988 99.
Well, I was down on my last.
Dollar Then I started saving cuz the bank said fiscal restraint is what you're craving.
So I put my earnings in a.
High yield account, let the savings compound and the interest mount.
I'm optimizing cash flow, putting debt in check.
Now time is my friend and not a pain in the neck. And we've got a little cash to rebuild the old deck. Boring money moves make kind of lame songs but they sound pretty sweet to your wallet.
BNC bank, brilliantly boring since 1865.
Trent Shores
What are you doing?
Bill O'Reilly
Well, I didn't say, I think you're being a little harsh on Trump on that one. I think what he wanted to do because I know him so well, I know how he prepares for this kind of stuff. I think he wanted to basically get on the side of Erica Kirk, get on her side and then say as I said in the lead up to this interview, look, Erica Trump is a better person than I am. I can't do it. Erica Kirk, I'm sorry, Erica Kirk is a better person than I am. I can't Bring that level of forgiveness. I thought that was a good moment for Trump.
Leland Vittert
No, look, I thought the embracing her was a great moment. He should have done it at the beginning. That's what the crowd needed. So I'm just telling you from being in the room that when he came out and did the whole Lee Greenwood thing, it just didn't work. It felt like a rally. This wasn't a rally. This wasn't.
Bill O'Reilly
I think it's a valid point. You did not want, you did not want it to feel like a rally, but it's so hard. Just keep this in mind and I'll talk about this on your show tonight because I'm going to be on with Leland at 9 on News Nation. When you lose your life because of your political beliefs, whether it's Martin Luther King Jr. Whether it's Bobby Kennedy, whether it's John F. Kennedy, when you lose your life, that's what took his life. Somebody reinforcing those beliefs to a crowd that may not know because remember, a lot of people didn't know Charlie Kirk. They don't know which is, that's true. But remember, he's playing worldwide here.
Leland Vittert
Yeah, Bill, I hear you. Just as I've, I've not covered politics as long as you have. But from my sort of covering of the movement and the people, he missed the moment to hold people's hand and to say, I feel your pain and I feel your loss and we can all learn from you, Erica. And I'll put it another way, Just, just raw politics here. Donald Trump never filled the football stadium. Charlie Kirk did. The power of Turning Point USA to pull together 100,000 person event in a week was stunning.
Bill O'Reilly
Yeah, you were all the media.
Leland Vittert
So they did all this. That organization's got serious power and serious staying power. And I think you run the risk of squandering this moment to merge MAGA and Turning Point usa. That was the moment Trump had.
Bill O'Reilly
But that's not what he does. He, Donald Trump lives in the moment. He does. He's not thinking about that. But here's something interesting. The criticism of Trump after the memorial service ended on the networks and Ms. And CNN was muted. It was muted. Everybody was told to tone it down because they would have opened up even on the View today and a few of the others, they didn't come after him the way they might have.
Leland Vittert
Yeah, look, I think we're in a different moment politically because of one, these networks have seen the backlash that has happened with their viewership to. They've seen the backlash that's happened corporately and the threat of that and the feeling about that is very real. I didn't watch the coverage. I was sort of doing our you.
Bill O'Reilly
Have to trust me on that one. So I was, I got it. I got the stats here. Once we banish you, I'm going to read them. But anyway, look, I understand what your point of view is. I have a see it a little bit differently.
Leland Vittert
Yeah, I understand. But I'll just give you, I'll give you this last thing to think about is this is what the conservative movement in America is going to be. And I think you saw a two path turning point, if you will, or inflection point here of does MAGA become turning point which has this very deep faith based discussion and basis or do they remain separate now?
Bill O'Reilly
I don't that's the inflection point. Nobody can predict. I will tell you this. If Erica Kirk decides to run for higher office, she'll win.
Leland Vittert
Well, that's what I always said about her husband, right.
Bill O'Reilly
That if.
Leland Vittert
Her husband would have been president or nominee.
Bill O'Reilly
All right, Leland, we'll see you tonight. Nine Eastern News Nation. We appreciate it very much.
You're listening to the no Spa News Weekend edition.
All right. Here's the unreported story of the year. So there is testimony going on in the House Oversight Committee. That's Comer. Okay. James Comer, about whether President Biden was actually running the country while he was in the Oval Office because there are questions about he might not even make any decisions. That's how far gone he was. And they had the chief of staff, Jeff Zinz in there on September 18, a couple of days ago Friday. So joining us now from Washington is a reporter for the Washington examiner who's actually been covering the proceedings here, Kaylin Deese, while many other reporters and news organizations are kind of ignoring us. Does that surprise you, Caitlin, that it hasn't gotten more traction, this story?
Kaylin Deese
Well, I wish it didn't surprise me, but it entirely does because everything about what Democrats have said during these investigations that the House Oversight Committee has been doing is constantly just, you know, questioning or telling the press not to look back in the past. Don't believe your lying eyes about everything that you saw the last four years of the Biden administration. And the press seems to be sort of going along with that the whole way through. Meanwhile, you have no sense of hesitation to go through and cover some of the retrospective parts of the Biden administration, whether it be, you know, the Jake Tapper collaborative book Original Sin or Kamala Harris's upcoming book. But it's ironic because those books and Those retellings of 2024 are kind of getting exactly to the point of what the Oversight Committee is finding in these investigations. And you know, at first, you know, there was a little bit of a comment from here and there and certain, you know, political aides. Then in the middle of these investigations, we got silence from people pleading the Fifth Amendment, including Biden's doctor. And that all sort of hit an apex this last Friday or last week with Jeff Zients whenever he gave his full threaded testimony and really showed kind of the reason why a lot of these people in Biden's inner circle did plead the Fifth because he didn't really hold back. He really sort of kind of contended with the fact that Biden was declining.
Bill O'Reilly
In the final year was one of the few. Now the only crime would be if they actively misled. You know, you could prosecute there. I don't expect that to happen. What surprised you? Give me two things that you assembled about these hearings that surprised you the most. Give me two.
Kaylin Deese
Well, the most surprising thing from this most recent hearing was whenever Zients basically explained that Hunter Biden was sitting in on several of these meetings about pardons, that inclemency acts that the president was doing in his final days in office. The other thing that didn't necessarily come from the hearings but was sort of spurred up as part of the hearings was whenever the oversight project was able to subpoena records from the DOJ that showed that there was a high ranking deputy there in there that was basically raising caution to the White House about the way that some of these, you know, clemency proposals were phrased, talking about how this phrasing that it was going to be for nonviolent offenders. This deputy in the DOJ was able to point out there were 16 of clemency acts that were given to former incarcerated people that were actually, you know, violent cases, that they just were given clemency as part of the sweeping orders that the president was doing.
Bill O'Reilly
I don't think anybody believes that Biden knew what those clemency orders were. He, the auto pen just did his job for him and that was that. That's what I believe. Do you believe that?
Kaylin Deese
I think that we are getting to a clearer picture from the Oversight Committee that they're going to be able to show that there were multiple occasions whenever senior aides contradicted themselves when they said that they believed Biden was fit to serve another four years when behind the scenes they were scrambling and creating accommodations for the fact that Biden was not looking good in public. And so I think that what we're getting to is that a report that the oversight committee is going to put out and, and I think that if they have any information that they haven't divulged yet, it's going to show exactly that Biden didn't know everything that he was doing and be able to present a case that maybe he wasn't privy to any of the clemency acts that he was.
Bill O'Reilly
I mean, we know that he wasn't.
Kaylin Deese
Yeah, he wasn't signing off on individual clemency acts.
Bill O'Reilly
Okay. Carolyn. Stan a case. We really appreciate your time tonight. Thank you.
This is the no Spin news Weekend Edition.
Okay. Let's go over to vengeance.
This episode is brought to you by White Claw Surge. Nice choice hitting up this podcast. No surprises. You're all about diving into tastes everyone in the room can enjoy. Just like White Claw Surge. It's for celebrating those moments when connections have been made and the night's just begun. With bold flavors and 8% alcohol by volume. Unleash the night. Unleash White Claw Surge. Please drink responsibly. Hard seltzer with flavors, 8% alcohol by volume. White Claw Seltzer Works, Chicago, Illinois Mint is still $15 a month for premium wireless. And if you haven't made the switch yet, here are 15 reasons why you should. One, it's $15 a month. Two, seriously, it's $15 a month. Three, no big contracts. Four, I use it. Five, my mom uses it.
Are you playing me off?
That's what's happening, right? Okay, give it a try.
@Mintmobile.Com Switch upfront payment of 45 for 3 month plan.
Dana
15 per month equivalent required. New customer offer, first 3 months only. Then full price plan, options available, taxes.
Bill O'Reilly
And fees, extra cement mobile.com Vengeance is mine, Saith the Lord, part of the Bible. Right. But Donald Trump intruded on that a little bit. So he wants to get his enemies, no doubt about it. You want to be honest and we do, of course. So there are three cases against people that Donald Trump despises. One is Senator Schiff in California. The other is New York Attorney General Letitia James. And final, former FBI Director James Comey. There they are. All three have tortured Donald Trump, tried to destroy him and his family, and now Trump is coming after them. So There was a U.S. attorney in Virginia, Eric Seibert, who was in charge of James and Comey, and Trump fired him because apparently he wasn't moving fast enough or didn't want to move or something. I don't know exactly what Mr. Seibert did wrong, but he's fired. Replaced by Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Lindsey Halligan, 36 years old from Colorado. She worked in Florida with the president. She is the new attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Now, again, she's going to do what Donald Trump suggests, but she can't manufacture evidence. She can't, but she can aggressively investigate. These things are very murky. So Adam Schiff, he apparently has a house in Maryland that he's not doing. He's saying that he lives there, but he doesn't live there. And Letitia James, the same thing. She has a house in Virginia and she said it was her primary residence, but it's not a primary residence. And comey, it's all about lying about the Russian collusion investigation. Those are the three charges that are swirling. All right, so on Adam Schiff, here's what President Trump said. Go.
Donald Trump
I stay out of it purposely. But it's mortgage loan fraud.
Bill O'Reilly
It's a big deal.
Donald Trump
He defrauded banks and insurance companies and the federal government, but it's very simple. It's mortgage loan fraud. And you're right, that's a lot of people to live in a one bedroom apartment. Right, but he put it down. But he has a lot of other things far worse than that. So no, Adam Schiff, they have him 100% on mortgage fraud.
Bill O'Reilly
Well, I don't know whether they have 100% because he would be indicted then. But that's a Maryland play. As far as Letitia James, it's kind of the same situation with a mortgage deal. Roll it.
Donald Trump
Well, I don't know what it is currently, but Letitia James, who's the Attorney General of New York State, it seemed I'm not involved in that at all. I know that it's being handled by various groups, I guess, but it's major fraud. Mortgage documents and fraudulent everything.
Bill O'Reilly
All right, so, I mean, he says he's not involved, but Donald Trump's monitoring, as you know. He is joining us now from Tulsa, Oklahoma, is a former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma under Donald Trump in his first term, Trent Shores, why do you think Eric Seibert in Virginia was fired?
Trent Shores
Listen, when you sign up to be a United States Attorney, you serve at the pleasure of the president. So, you know, going into that job that you may be forced into situations where you have to make a decision. In this case, I don't know that we publicly know Enough facts to know why Mr. Seibert was removed from his position. But that is a power that the President enjoys. He is the leader of the executive branch. He can set priorities, he can give direction. The one thing that the President doesn't do as he's, you know, as he knows, is make charging decisions that ultimately is left up to the United States Attorney and to the officials at DOJ in this case.
Bill O'Reilly
But you have to assume that Cyber was reporting to Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, and Pam Bonney was reporting to Trump and Trump did not like the way this investigation was being handled. I mean, that's 100%, right?
Trent Shores
Yeah. I don't know that we know it's 100% that the president didn't like how the investigation was being handled. I think what the President is wanting are charges brought sooner. He believes that based on what he knows, it certainly seems that he thinks there is a case that is provable beyond a reasonable doubt. We have to remember, we don't know what evidence Mr. Seibert or his team of investigators have assembled, but there is no question that there is an investigation ongoing. A mortgage fraud case, Bill, it's a white collar case. These aren't always quick or swift investigations. They're document laden and intensive. So it could be that they just haven't reached an ultimate conclusion yet whether to bring charges.
Bill O'Reilly
Okay, well, I think that is the case. But Cyber was displeasing President Trump because he's won out of What? How many U.S. attorneys are there? There's hundreds across the country and he's singled out for a firing. Now, when you were attorney, the U.S. attorney in Oklahoma, what did you have to do on high profile cases? Did you have to call Bill Barr, the Attorney General? Did you have to keep him up to speed? How does that work?
Trent Shores
Sure, that's a great question because a lot of folks don't know you are empowered as a presidentially appointed and Senate confirmed United States Attorney to make those tough calls. But again, you don't do so in isolation. We look to the Justice Manual, which is our sort of insider handbook that provides U.S. guidelines and policies. And when you have a high profile case like that, you are going to coordinate, of course, with the Office of the Attorney General. In my case, that was Bill Barr and that was Jeff Sessions. You're also going to work closely with the Deputy Attorney General to ensure that what you're doing is in accordance with department policy.
Bill O'Reilly
Yeah, and they want to know too. So when Trump asks them or Biden or whatever president, they can say this is where it is. This is how they're going to. And this is the odds of indictment, on and on and on. But I would assume that there are some US Attorneys that get cases they don't like and they kind of slow walk it. Right.
Trent Shores
I don't know that there are U.S. attorneys, in my experience, Bill, that will slow walk a case if they have been presented with their job by that particular president. I don't think any prosecutor becomes a prosecutor because they don't want to prosecute cases.
Bill O'Reilly
But what about the politics of it? I mean, you know, not. I wouldn't say in Oklahoma, that would be a major factor where you are, but certainly in Washington, D.C. my God, there's politics and everything there. So if this guy cyber, if his whole world is, you know, anti Trump, which is absolutely possible, and he doesn't want to really bring charges against Comey and who he probably knows, right? Comey. I have to know him and James. And then he's kind of, kind of like, well, you know, you know how it goes. You can pedal to the metal or you can just give it to your 15th guy. Right.
Trent Shores
Listen, there's no doubt that it's a political appointment, but I think you see that U.S. attorneys that do the job well follow where the evidence leads, and that's not always politically convenient. At the same time, there is no problem with the attorney General or even the president himself expressing that they hope their prosecutors, their US attorneys, are more aggressive. Looking at Mr. Seibert's case in the Eastern District of Virginia, he has to make a determination, one, whether he has the evidence to satisfy the elements of the crime to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. And two, he has to look at who's going to be in his jury pool there in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Dana
And.
Trent Shores
And I think those present challenges potentially, to bringing a case that has this perception, as it's been presented by mainstream media, that it's a political prosecution, even if it's not.
Bill O'Reilly
All right, so you're suggesting that Mr. Seibert may have gotten shafted on this.
Trent Shores
I'm not saying he got in shaft.
Bill O'Reilly
No, I know you're not saying it, but you're saying you're leaving open the possibility that he was doing his job in an honest way and he got whacked because Trump wanted it done faster.
Trent Shores
Sure, I think that's possible. This idea of justice delayed is justice denied is not a foreign concept in our system. But, yes, Mr. Seibert had choices in front of him. And it appears that when you serve at the pleasure of the president, as is the case in any administration, that you may face choices that could result in you needing to step away from your job.
Bill O'Reilly
All right. We appreciate it, Council. Thanks very much for helping us out. I think that he was honest. And every president has certain cases that they're very interested in and they want specific updates. And if you don't give it to them, you're gone. And that's just the way the system works.
You're listening to the no Spa News Weekend Edition.
Now, what happened to cnn? CNN used to be on every breaking news story, every big event in the world because I've been in the business 50 years. CNN dominated. They dominated the news coverage and they got whacked on this Charlie Kirk thing. 46,000 in a key demo. That's local news. Nobody's going to CNN anymore for breaking news. So joining us now from Maine is a guy who knows probably more about CNN than anybody else. His name is John Malone. You've heard about him. He's a very successful businessman. He's got a new book out called Born to Be Wired, Lessons From a Lifetime, Transforming Television, Wiring America for the Internet, Growing Formula One, Discovery Serious and the Atlanta Braves. That is some subtitle to that book, Mr. Malone, but thank you for appearing. Look, you were there in various capacities and even now you're the chair emeritus of Warner Brothers Discovery, which owns cnn. You saw the change from a hard news agency into a left wing concern. Did that bother you when it was happening?
John Malone
Well, it depends on where I was at the time. I guess I would say my involvement in the governance of CNN really started with the merger of Discovery. And.
Dana
At New Balance. We believe if you run, you're a runner, however you choose to do it. Because when you're not worried about doing things the right way, you're free to discover your way. And that's what running is all about. Run your way. @newbalance.com Running.
Bill O'Reilly
And Doug, here we have the Limu Emu in its natural habitat.
Helping people customize their car insurance and.
Save hundreds with Liberty Mutual.
Fascinating. Im it's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug. Limu is that guy with the binoculars watching us. Cut the camera. They see us.
Only pay for what you need@liberty mutual.com Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Savings very underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Affiliates, excludes.
John Malone
Massachusetts and Time Warner, which took place about three years ago. Before that, I would say I was a shareholder indirectly and directly in Time Warner but also in, for instance, News Corp. That had Fox News and and we were owners of CNBC and We owned the McNeil Lair NewsHour for many years and underwrote that for the public broadcasting side. So I've been in and around news for a very long time. Created CNBC together with the GE guys. So a long history in television news because I came from it as a distributor.
Bill O'Reilly
Right. You were in the cable side of it, and you're a technical genius, and you saw early on that the cable was going to dominate. You got in, you made a lot of money. But you write in your book that no Time Warner Discovery executives would interfere when Trump got into the political arena and CNN went anti Trump. Now, it seems to me if you're a big stockholder in that company, and you are, and you saw what was happening, that CNN was losing some of its credibility and grown since Ted Turner had owned it, that maybe somebody would have said something. But apparently that didn't happen.
John Malone
Well, I said something and I got. I got ripped for it. I didn't want to cause a walkout at the CNN newsroom, but I suggested that they follow the Fox model a little more closely and just label news news and label opinion opinion and maybe even have, you know, a guest column or two. But. But they should differentiate. When, when we got started with Fox News, it was a call from Rupert Murdoch that said, is there room in America for another video news channel? At that point, I was already a big investor in, in Ted Turner and cnn. And I said, yes, there is, Rupert, but you have to come in center. Center. Right. And so Rupert's theory was, we're going to have real news. We're going to have guys like Brett Baer or Britt Hume before him, and it's going to be serious news. It's not going to be opinion. And then we're going to have a show that is entertaining and focuses really on politics, anything of current interest. And that was the original thesis. And, you know, your viewers, I'm sure they remember good old Rush Limbaugh. But Rupert's first thought was, go recruit Rush Limbaugh to be the anchor on the first Fox News show. And I actually tried to talk Rush into it, and I couldn't. But he gave us Roger Ailes, which was a great.
Bill O'Reilly
Yeah. And I was the. I was the guy who did the primetime opinion show. But we actively sought Mr. Malone, the other side. My orders to my staff were, find the smartest person you can who disagrees with me whether. And I wasn't an ideologue. I never have been. And we put them on now on cnn, I got the number one selling book in the country right now, Confronting Evil. I can't get booked on cnn. I talked to Anderson Cooper directly. I said, Anderson, you put me on, you're going to double your numbers. You're going to double them. And I got 20 number one bestsellers on the New York Times list. That's a world record. Why wouldn't you put me on Silence?
John Malone
Well, I think you got to start by saying that, that CNN has great journalists, but they all are educated from the left.
Bill O'Reilly
Why? Why is that? You're one of the best business people in the country. And if people don't know John Malone, just Google it and you'll see how successful he has been. Why would you go exclusively left when that's not a good business plan?
John Malone
Well, for a little while. Let's go back. If you go back to Ted, ted really founded CNN and his idea was, you know, 247 real news. And he recruited a lot of young people right out of journalism school and some who hadn't been to journalism school. And he started off, I think, fulfilling his mission. In fact, he was even being accused of being a right winger early on. But over time, Ted's views tended to be a little, a little more progressive, let's say, than conservative. His involvement with Jane tended to push him a little more in that direction. But nothing pushed CNN to the left like Rupert coming in on the right.
Bill O'Reilly
Well, that's true, but it hasn't worked. And now CNN's going to be sold. I understand. I think that might happen in the next few months. It didn't work, so why not pivot back to what you used to be when James Earl Jones was doing the voiceovers? Last word.
John Malone
They didn't make me put me in charge of cnn. So I really have to just say I was a, a director and a shareholder and basically had zero net influence over the direction of CNN while I was in that role at.
Bill O'Reilly
Still doesn't make any sense, though. You're, you're a very astute mind. It doesn't make any sense. I think it's a Trump thing. I think it's probably that, but I'm not sure the book is Born to Be Wired. I found it really fascinating because I was, you know, right in on this 1996 wave of the cable competition. Mr. Malone, the best to you. Thank you for appearing tonight.
Thank you for listening to the no Spin News Weekend Edition. To watch the full episodes of the no spin news, visit billoriley.com and sign up to become a premium or concierge member, that's billoriley.com sign up and start watching today. Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable LG X Boom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because, let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom and for a limited time, save 25.5percent@LG.com with code Fall25 Bring the Boom X Boom.
This Weekend Edition of No Spin News, hosted by Bill O'Reilly, focuses on the fallout and political implications of the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk, key moments from his memorial, President Trump's polarizing speech there, and analysis of the evolving dynamics within the American conservative movement. The episode also delves into the latest House Oversight Committee hearings questioning President Biden’s capacity in his final year, examines Donald Trump’s moves against key political opponents, and explores the dramatic decline of CNN’s viewership with insight from industry titan John Malone.
Leland Vittert (News Nation), present at the event, describes the moment as a lost opportunity for unity and healing:
O'Reilly’s Defense:
Vittert emphasizes the unique position of Turning Point USA:
Discussion explores whether MAGA will merge with the more faith-based Turning Point ethos under Erica Kirk, whom both agree could win higher office if she ran.
“I hate my opponent, and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry, Erica.”
— Donald Trump, commenting candidly on his inability to forgive, echoing O’Reilly’s own comments (03:22)
“By the end of Trump's speech, it was less than half full, maybe even a third full. It was a stunning rebuke of President Trump.”
— Leland Vittert (07:26)
“Charlie Kirk was the first person who was able to merge politics and faith… and in America, he did it.”
— Leland Vittert (09:15)
“I've never been in a room… that you felt the emotion — I sort of wanted to throw up, I sort of wanted to cry, I had admiration.”
— Leland Vittert describing Erica Kirk's forgiveness (09:41)
“That's local news. Nobody's going to CNN anymore for breaking news.”
— Bill O’Reilly (33:18)
“CNN has great journalists, but they all are educated from the left.”
— John Malone (40:00)
| Segment | Time | |-----------------------------------|--------------| | Trump’s Memorial Speech Clip | 03:02–04:19 | | Memorial crowd reaction | 06:26–07:26 | | Faith and politics in Turning Pt | 09:15–10:00 | | Discussion: Turning Point vs MAGA | 14:04–16:58 | | Biden Oversight Hearings | 17:28–22:11 | | Trump v. Schiff/James/Comey | 23:23–26:37 | | Interview: Trent Shores | 26:59–32:49 | | CNN’s Ratings Decline | 33:13–33:18 | | Interview: John Malone | 34:40–42:29 |
This episode offers a vivid snapshot of the current American political and media landscape: the emerging power of the conservative faith-based movement after Charlie Kirk’s death, deep divides among conservatives on appropriate political messaging, public and journalistic skepticism about the Biden administration’s narrative, Trump’s aggressive post-presidency tactics, and the unraveling of legacy media institutions struggling with public trust and relevance. Throughout, the hosts and guests maintain a tone that is frank, combative at times, and thoroughly in keeping with Bill O’Reilly’s promise: “No Spin. Just Facts.”