
Loading summary
A
Bill O'Reilly here, and I'm warming up. Standby for the O'Reilly Update. Morning edition. On this Thursday, the U.S. women's Ice Hockey team is playing Canada for the Olympic gold medal. The American ladies are a better team and most likely will prevail. The rivalry, however, is partially political, as it will be for the men's final, probably featuring Canada in the usa. The reason is that America and its neighbor to the north are far apart culturally. And it's downright strange. Canada has evolved into a secular country that has accepted woke not every province. The ones in the west are more conservative, but the big cities certainly are liberal. You couldn't elect a guy like Justin Trudeau if that were not the case. President Trump believes Canada has taken advantage of the USA in trade as well as defense, and there is some truth to that. So relations between the two countries are at an all time low. In fact, Canadian travel to the states down 25%. Not good, eh? Mr. Trump would like hockey legend Wayne Gretzky to be the prime minister, but that's not going to happen. Mr. Gretzky is too smart to enter that political arena. Pucks, sure. Schmucks. No. I always have a great time when I visit Canada and I anticipate the thaw will melt, but not until the Olympics is over. Back in a moment. That is the Morning O'Reilly update. More analysis later on.
In the O'Reilly Update Morning Edition for February 19, 2026, host Bill O’Reilly offers his signature “no spin” analysis on the ongoing U.S. versus Canada rivalry, both on and off the Olympic ice. While focusing on the women’s hockey gold medal clash between the U.S. and Canada, O’Reilly dives into the deeper political and cultural divides fueling the competition, touches on current U.S.-Canada relations, and closes with characteristic wit.
O’Reilly’s analysis is direct and laced with his trademark dry humor. He blends sports commentary with sharp political and cultural insights, giving listeners both context and a few laughs. The episode leans into current geopolitical tensions while ending on a hopeful, conciliatory note—reflecting O’Reilly’s “always looking out for you” approach.