Podcast Summary
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Episode: O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, January 28, 2026
Host: Bill O’Reilly
Date: January 28, 2026
Episode Overview
On this episode of the O’Reilly Update Morning Edition, Bill O’Reilly sharply critiques the mainstream media for ignoring an alleged major story tied to ongoing unrest in Minnesota. He exposes the involvement of billionaire tech mogul Neville Roy Singham—accused of funding radical groups that, according to O’Reilly, are inciting violence and chaos. O’Reilly frames this as a “red alert” moment in American politics, connecting it to broader themes of foreign influence and domestic subversion.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Media Silence on the Minnesota Unrest
- O’Reilly’s Criticism:
O’Reilly opens by accusing the “corrupt American media” of ignoring a significant development regarding chaos in Minnesota.- Quote: “The corrupt American media is ignoring an enormous story attached to the chaos in Minnesota.” [00:32]
2. Allegations Against Neville Roy Singham
- Background:
- Neville Roy Singham, a billionaire tech mogul, is accused of funding insurrectionist activities in Minneapolis.
- Singham dubbed as a “communist who lives in Shanghai, China” and “loyal to the Beijing government.”
- Quote: “There is emerging evidence that a billionaire tech mogul Neville Roy Singham is funding, at least in part, the insurrection in Minneapolis.” [00:41]
- Additional background on Singham:
- Age: 71
- Born in Connecticut
- Married to Jody Evans, founder of Code Pink (described as a “radical group”).
- Previously investigated by the FBI.
3. Alleged Funding Mechanisms
- Funneling Money to Radical Groups:
- O’Reilly claims Singham uses Breakthrough News, a nonprofit, as a channel to funnel “millions” to groups such as:
- Democratic Socialists of America
- Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee
- O’Reilly describes these as “subversive outfits” actively organizing on the ground in Minnesota.
- O’Reilly claims Singham uses Breakthrough News, a nonprofit, as a channel to funnel “millions” to groups such as:
4. Intent and Strategy of the Groups
- Aim:
O’Reilly asserts these groups are committed to:- Disrupting law enforcement, specifically federal agents.
- Provoking violence to undermine the federal government.
- Quote: “The goal is to undermine the federal government to create as much violence and chaos as possible.” [01:24]
5. Call to Attention and Urgency
- O’Reilly’s Warning:
- Expresses frustration that the media has not given this alleged development attention.
- Calls this a “red alert.”
- Quote: “Red alert here. Correct. When you have a hostile foreign government engaging with a billionaire to get money to far left radical groups promoting discord, that’s a hell of a story.” [01:37]
Notable Quotes and Memorable Moments
-
On media coverage:
- “The corrupt American media is ignoring an enormous story attached to the chaos in Minnesota.” [00:32]
-
On Singham’s involvement:
- “There is emerging evidence that a billionaire tech mogul Neville Roy Singham is funding, at least in part, the insurrection in Minneapolis.” [00:41]
- “He uses a US Nonprofit called Breakthrough News to funnel millions to radical groups like Democratic Socialists of America and the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee.” [01:02]
-
On the goal of radical groups:
- “The goal is to undermine the federal government to create as much violence and chaos as possible.” [01:24]
-
On the magnitude and urgency:
- “Red alert here. Correct. When you have a hostile foreign government engaging with a billionaire to get money to far left radical groups promoting discord, that’s a hell of a story.” [01:37]
Key Timestamps
- 00:32–02:14: Main content — O’Reilly explains and analyzes the alleged involvement of Neville Roy Singham in Minnesota unrest and criticizes media silence.
Note:
Advertisements and promotional content (before [00:32] and after [02:14]) were omitted per guidelines. This summary captures the essential arguments and tone of Bill O’Reilly’s monologue, focusing on his concern about foreign influence, radical funding, and the lack of media coverage.
