Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis

Episode: O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, January 6, 2026

Host: Bill O’Reilly
Date: January 6, 2026

Overview

In the O’Reilly Update Morning Edition of January 6, 2026, Bill O’Reilly delivers a pointed commentary on the credibility and reporting at ABC News, specifically targeting anchor George Stephanopoulos. Using the current context of US foreign intervention in Venezuela, O’Reilly criticizes what he sees as journalistic failures and clarifies the legal reasoning behind recent US actions to remove Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

Criticism of George Stephanopoulos and ABC News

• O’Reilly starts with a direct critique:

  “George Stephanopoulos has recertified his status as a nitwit, which has been growing ever since Donald Trump entered politics.”
  ([00:12])

• He references a past incident where Stephanopoulos allegedly cost ABC $16 million in legal fees after making an inflammatory accusation about the president:

  “George, who cost ABC News about $16 million in legal costs last year after calling the president a rapist, is very concerned there’s no legitimate basis to justify the removal of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro.”
  ([00:20])

• O’Reilly implies ABC’s news priorities have shifted away from substantive world events:

  “Most likely because ABC now does so many weather-related reports, the staff has fallen out of touch with real news. If you want to know whether it was cloudy in Caracas when US Special Forces grabbed Maduro, ABC is your go-to.”
  ([00:38])

Explaining the Legal Basis for US Action in Venezuela

• O’Reilly lays out the legal reasoning for the Trump administration’s use of military force:

  “On November 24, 2025, the Trump administration designated the Cartel de los Soles as a terrorist organization. That means the USA can legally use military force against it.”
  ([00:53])

• He outlines Maduro’s alleged ties to the cartel and narcotics smuggling:

  “Los Soles smuggles narcotics into America and does a number of other criminal things. Maduro is allegedly involved with the group. At least that’s what the Justice Department says.”
  ([01:07])

• O’Reilly adds intrigue about Maduro’s alleged hidden wealth:

  “That is the legal basis for Trump’s action against Old Nick, who the CIA believes has $200 million stashed away. Wow. Who knew being the dictator of Venezuela paid so well?”
  ([01:18])

Mocking Stephanopoulos’ and ABC's Coverage

• O’Reilly questions Stephanopoulos’s knowledge:

  “Do you think George Stephanopoulos knows any of this? I don’t.”
  ([01:34])

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “George Stephanopoulos has recertified his status as a nitwit, which has been growing ever since Donald Trump entered politics.” (Bill O’Reilly, [00:12])
• “Most likely because ABC now does so many weather related reports, the staff has fallen out of touch with real news.” (Bill O’Reilly, [00:38])
• “If you want to know whether it was cloudy in Caracas when US Special Forces grabbed Maduro, ABC is your go to. But if you’re looking for actual facts, keep your focus here.” (Bill O’Reilly, [00:45])
• “Who knew being the dictator of Venezuela paid so well?” (Bill O’Reilly, [01:22])

Important Timestamps

• [00:02] – O’Reilly intro and theme for 2026
• [00:12] – Lampooning George Stephanopoulos
• [00:20] – Reference to ABC’s legal troubles over a Stephanopoulos comment
• [00:38] – Critique of ABC’s focus on weather vs. world news
• [00:53] – Explanation of legal justification for Maduro’s removal
• [01:07] – Maduro’s alleged cartel involvement
• [01:18] – CIA’s claim about Maduro’s fortune
• [01:34] – Final jab at Stephanopoulos’ awareness

Tone and Delivery

Bill O’Reilly uses his trademark sardonic, direct delivery, employing sarcasm and harsh criticism particularly aimed at ABC and Stephanopoulos. He positions himself as delivering the “actual facts,” contrasting with what he characterizes as the shallow or misguided coverage of mainstream networks.

Summary

Bill O’Reilly opens 2026 with an unapologetically sharp critique of mainstream media, specifically ABC News and George Stephanopoulos, calling into question their coverage and understanding of recent US actions in Venezuela. He explains the official legal basis for removing Maduro, underscores the alleged crimes and fortune of the Venezuelan leader, and closes with a call to seek factual analysis on his platform, contrasting it with other outlets’ priorities.