Loading summary
A
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. Between two factor authentication, strong passwords and a VPN, you try to be in control of how your info is protected. But many other places also have it and they might not be as careful. That's why Lifelock monitors hundreds of millions of data points a second for threats. If your identity is stolen, they'll fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Save up to 40% your first year. Make visit lifelock.com podcast for 40% off terms apply.
B
Bill O'Reilly here, and I'm warming up. Standby for the O'Reilly update. Morning Edition on this Wednesday, there are a number of reasons why the Trump administration sent the military to contain the anti ICE riots in Los Angeles. We have discussed the politics of the action. It does benefit President Trump by pleasing his MAGA base. But there's a motivation rarely discussed. During the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis in the spring of 2020, 520 individuals were charged with serious crimes. You may remember the city was on fire. Billions of dollars in damage, scores of people hurt, looting out of control. Well, out of those 520 cases, all but 26 were dismissed. The accused walked. President Trump believes the same thing would happen in Los Angeles. Few would be charged. Governor Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass don't blame the lawbreakers. They blame the president for the riots. The thinking is ICE should not even be in existence. Most deportation efforts should cease. In addition, relatively few violent protesters did time after the Rodney king riots in 1992 when President Bush the elder used the military to stop the carnage again in la. I was there. It was dangerous. The Insurrection act of 1807 gives all presidents the power to use the military when local authorities cannot ensure public safety. Like now in la. Back after this. Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. Theroux, the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five star reviews and an A plus from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text bill to 998-899 again, that's 866-32655, 7, 6. Or text bill to 998-899. That is the morning O'Reilly update. More analysis later on.
Podcast Summary: Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Episode: O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, June 11, 2025
Host: Bill O'Reilly
In the June 11, 2025, episode of O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, host Bill O'Reilly delivers a comprehensive analysis of recent events surrounding the deployment of the military to Los Angeles to manage anti-ICE riots. The episode delves into the political motivations, historical parallels, and broader implications of this action.
Bill O'Reilly begins by examining the Trump administration's decision to send the military to Los Angeles in response to anti-ICE riots. He emphasizes that while the immediate rationale appears to be maintaining public order, there are deeper, less-discussed motivations at play.
Notable Quote:
"There are a number of reasons why the Trump administration sent the military to contain the anti ICE riots in Los Angeles. We have discussed the politics of the action. It does benefit President Trump by pleasing his MAGA base." ([00:32])
O'Reilly highlights how the military's presence in Los Angeles serves to bolster President Trump's support among his core MAGA base. By taking decisive action against the riots, Trump reinforces his image as a strong leader committed to law and order, which resonates with his supporters.
Notable Quote:
"It does benefit President Trump by pleasing his MAGA base." ([00:32])
Drawing comparisons to past incidents, O'Reilly references the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis during the spring of 2020. He points out that out of 520 individuals charged with serious crimes during those riots, all but 26 cases were dismissed, suggesting a pattern where rioters are rarely held accountable.
Notable Quote:
"During the George Floyd riots in Minneapolis in the spring of 2020, 520 individuals were charged with serious crimes... all but 26 were dismissed." ([00:32])
He contends that President Trump anticipates a similar outcome in Los Angeles, believing that few rioters will ultimately face charges, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the riots.
O'Reilly discusses the stance of California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who deflect blame for the riots onto the federal administration. He notes that these local leaders argue against the existence of ICE and suggest that most deportation efforts should be halted.
Notable Quote:
"Governor Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass don't blame the lawbreakers. They blame the president for the riots." ([00:32])
"The thinking is ICE should not even be in existence. Most deportation efforts should cease." ([00:32])
To provide historical context, O'Reilly references the Rodney King riots of 1992, during which President George H.W. Bush deployed the military to Los Angeles. He contrasts the current situation with the past, noting that relatively few violent protesters faced legal consequences after the military intervention.
Notable Quote:
"Relatively few violent protesters did time after the Rodney King riots in 1992 when President Bush the elder used the military to stop the carnage again in LA." ([00:32])
O'Reilly shares a personal anecdote, stating, "I was there. It was dangerous," underscoring the seriousness of deploying military forces in urban unrest.
O'Reilly explains the legal authority underpinning the President's ability to deploy the military domestically. Citing the Insurrection Act of 1807, he clarifies that this legislation grants presidents the power to use military forces when local authorities are unable to maintain public safety.
Notable Quote:
"The Insurrection act of 1807 gives all presidents the power to use the military when local authorities cannot ensure public safety. Like now in LA." ([00:32])
Shifting focus, O'Reilly touches upon the current state of the U.S. economy, noting rising national debt and ongoing trade wars that are unsettling the markets. He underscores the significance of these economic pressures in the broader context of national stability.
Notable Quote:
"Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war shaking the markets." ([00:32])
Bill O'Reilly's analysis in this episode provides a multifaceted look at the recent deployment of the military in Los Angeles, exploring the political benefits for President Trump, historical patterns of legal outcomes following riots, the perspectives of local authorities, and the legal justifications for such interventions. Additionally, he touches upon the strained U.S. economy and its implications for national security and policy-making.
O'Reilly concludes by setting the stage for further analysis, promising more in-depth discussion in subsequent segments of the O'Reilly Update Morning Edition.
Note: Advertisements and promotional segments were omitted from this summary to focus solely on the episode's substantive content.