O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, May 18, 2026

Summary

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis

Episode: O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, May 18, 2026
Host: Bill O'Reilly
Date: May 18, 2026

---

Episode Overview

In this brief Morning Edition, Bill O’Reilly reacts to recent public statements by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) regarding American history, specifically her comments on communism and socialism in the nation’s origins. O’Reilly critiques her historical knowledge, offers nuanced praise for her political achievements, and underscores the importance of historical accuracy in public debate.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Commentary on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Historical Claims

• Bill O’Reilly references a recent commentary he posted on YouTube about AOC’s knowledge of history, labeling it as “scant.”
  • “I recently did a commentary on YouTube about Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her knowledge of history, which is scant–S C A N T to say the least.” [00:06]
• O’Reilly’s position is clear: He isn’t attacking AOC personally but is critical of her understanding of how U.S. history unfolded.

2. Acknowledgment of AOC’s Achievements

• Despite critiquing her historical perspective, O’Reilly admits respect for AOC’s "pluck" and accomplishments:
  • “I'm not in business to run down Congresswoman Ocasio Cortez. In fact, I admire her pluck. I mean, there's a woman that comes out of Boston University, and I have a master's degree from that school as well, and gets a congressional seat held by a longtime Democratic player. All right, she is a woman of accomplishment…” [00:20]

3. O’Reilly’s Critique: Labeling AOC as a “Communist”

• O’Reilly calls AOC a “communist,” referencing podcast interviews where she linked the roots of communism/socialism to America's founding era:
  • “…but she is a communist. And recently she gave a couple of podcast interviews where she said, hey, there was communism or socialism, whatever you want to call it, in the beginning of this nation.” [00:38]

4. Debunking Historical Inaccuracies

• O’Reilly points out the historical inaccuracy in AOC’s comments about “billionaires” existing during America’s founding:
  • “The founding fathers were aware of it because of the billionaires. The problem is, Congresswoman, there were no billionaires. Why? Because the king of England, George, would not allow that.” [00:47]
  • “Yes, there were dukes and earls and landowners. They weren't billionaires. They took what the king gave them. So we need a little history update here, Congresswoman, just trying to help.” [00:57]

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “I admire her pluck... she is a woman of accomplishment, but she is a communist.” – Bill O’Reilly [00:22]
• “There were no billionaires. Why? Because the king of England, George, would not allow that. Yes, there were dukes and earls and landowners. They weren't billionaires. They took what the king gave them. So we need a little history update here.” – Bill O’Reilly [00:49]
• “Congresswoman, just trying to help.” – Bill O’Reilly [01:01]

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• 00:02 – Episode opening and context for commentary
• 00:06 – Critique of AOC’s historical knowledge
• 00:20 – Acknowledgment of AOC’s achievements
• 00:38 – O’Reilly’s labeling of AOC’s political ideology
• 00:47 – Historical fact-check: Addressing billionaires and monarchy
• 00:57 – Call for historical accuracy and conclusion

---

Tone and Language

• O’Reilly maintains a direct and provocative tone, pairing stark criticism with begrudging respect for AOC’s rise in politics.
• The language is typical of O’Reilly’s “no spin” style—blunt, polemical, and pointedly corrective.
• The overall message is a call for factual accuracy in political rhetoric, especially regarding U.S. history.

---

Summary

This episode is a concise “morning update” featuring Bill O’Reilly’s critical analysis of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s recent comments about socialism and U.S. history. O’Reilly both critiques her grasp of American history—particularly her remarks about billionaires and the founding era—and acknowledges her as a “woman of accomplishment.” The episode showcases O’Reilly’s signature blend of sharp critique, historical correction, and “just the facts” delivery.

Transcript

[A]

Bill O'Reilly here, and I'm warming up. Standby for the O'Reilly Update Morning Edition on this Monday. I recently did a commentary on YouTube about Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and her knowledge of history, which is scant S C A N T to say the least. Now, I am not in business to run down Congressman Ocasio Cortez. In fact, I admire her pluck. I mean, there's a woman that comes out of Boston University, and I have a master's degree from that school as well, and gets a congressional seat held by a longtime Democratic player. All right, she is a woman of accomplishment, but she is a communist. And recently she gave a couple of podcast interviews where she said, hey, there was communism or socialism, whatever you want to call it, in the beginning of this nation. The founding fathers were aware of it because of the billionaires. The problem is, Congresswoman, there were no billionaires. Why? Because the king of England, George, would not allow that. Yes, there were dukes and earls and landowners. They weren't billionaires. They took what the king gave them. So we need a little history update here. Congresswoman, just trying to help. Back in a moment.

[B]

DISH has been connecting communities like yours for the last 45 years, providing the TV you love at a price you can trust. Watch live sports news and the latest movies, plus your favorite streaming apps, all in one place. Switch to DISH today

[A]

and lock in the lowest price in satellite TV,

[B]

starting at $89.99 a month with our two year price guarantee. Call 888-add-D dish or visit dish.com today.

[A]

That is the morning O'Reilly update. More analysis later on.