
BillOReilly.com Bonus
Loading summary
Bill O'Reilly
The battle of the Mars. So a few years ago, the PBS program finding your roots did a profile of me and I was happy to participate in it. That's Gates and that's on every week. And they trace my lineage back and they found out that Bill Maher is a long distance cousin of mine. Okay? Nobody can pick their relatives, as the saying goes. So Bill Maher, he does the HBO show. It's one of the few programs that's not on a network or anything like that. He's a gadfly. He's in. He understands the craziness of the progressive left. He's a liberal himself. And he's made a name for himself in the last year or so by criticizing his own. Enter a movement to stop funding for PBS and NPR to the tune of about 550 million taxpayer dollars a year. I support that. NPR and PBS do not need taxpayer money. They are left wing advocacy groups. And there's no doubt about it, there's no two sides to that story. If you watch them now, finding your roots isn't like that. I see that. And I can watch the four tops in one of their fundraising things. I like that. And they have entertainment program that doesn't have a political bent, but everything they do is designed to promote liberal causes in a Democratic party. I mean, Frontline, which used to be a very good documentary unit, ran in October, a program on the two candidates, Trump versus Harris. And I watched it top to bottom with a notepad to see if it was going to be a balanced presentation. They had 12 guests speaking well of Vice President Harris. They had no guests speaking well of Donald Trump. It was appalling. It was disgraceful. Don't put yourself up as a documentary unit when you're a propaganda outfit. When you are promoting a presidential candidate because you are an activist, then. So you're using my money, taxpayer money, to promote a political candidate that I believe would be destructive to the country. No, there's no fairness to that. There's no rationale for that. And in the age of $36 trillion debt, we don't need to spend a half billion dollars every year funding a progressive propaganda channel on television and radio. Am I wrong? If you think I'm wrong, bill it. Bello reilly.com all right, sesame street, the Muppets, whatever they got, fine. But do it on your own. If your product's better than the other product, you'll prosper. You can sell ads. If you're not taking the government money, we don't need this. It's wrong so there were hearings about PBS and npr. And the NPR CEO is a woman named Catherine Marr. She appears at the hearing. And conservative Republican Congressman Jim Jordan asks a very simple question. Is NPR biased? Congressman, I have never seen any instance of never of political bias determining editorial decisions. No. Ridiculous. She parsed it. A political bias determining editorial decision. She parsed it. But it's absurd. The whole culture is like, Terry Gross is one of their big radio presenters, and she's a skilled woman, but she is so liberal that if you're going to hire a Terry Gross, then you've got to hire a conservative to balance it out. Kathryn Marr is not going to do that because the culture @ NPR is 100% left wing. Enter Bill Maher. No relation. Here's what he says.
Bill Maher
I also read my namesake, Catherine Marr was head of npr. And you know, she said, we're completely unbiased. Give me a break, lady. I mean, they're crazy far left. These outlets became popular at a time when Republicans and Democrats didn't hate each other and weren't at each other's throats and didn't think each other was an existential threat. In that world, you can't have places like this, I think, anymore. They have to be private.
Bill O'Reilly
I think he's right. But I wouldn't object to a PBS NPR being funded by progressives. You know, they have their fundraisers. Okay, let the progressive left support you. If they like you so much, because that's what you do, they'll pick up the tab. I don't want to pick up your tab. Now. I wouldn't want a conservative television or radio network getting tax dollars either. I don't want propaganda. I hate it. I don't want the choir. I very rarely watch cable television because of that. You know, I don't learn anything. I want knowledge. I want facts. I want perspective. You don't get that. You watch Fox. 95% of people watch Fox are conservative. 95. When I was there, it was 60. Now it's 95. And out of those 95% that watch Fox, 90% of those are MAGA people. It's Trump. It's a Trump network. That's what it is. Now. Am I angry at Trump about. No. If I were Trump, I would be thrilled to have the Fox News Channel, which is far and away the highest rated channel, cable news channel. And the reason is because conservatives don't have anywhere else to go except Newsmax and Fox's talent. People that you see on television are better than Newsmax. They're more experienced, they're higher paid, they got more going on. So if you are a MAGA person. Yeah, one place to go. If you are a liberal person, you got cnn, msnbc, pbs, and the three networks, all of which are liberal, you got plenty of places to go. So it's audience divides, whereas Fox consolidates so they dominate. But I turn it on. My guys and gals produce many of the shows on Fox, and I train them, but they know who their audience is. So the audience wants their belief system reinforced. And that's just not on Fox. It's on all of them. Not all of them. To me, it's a boring, boring. That's why I've prospered in the independent news arena. On social media, which is what we're doing here. This is what we're doing. This commentary goes all over the world on YouTube. I love YouTube. I never have a beef. You know, people criticize. Are you kidding? Gives people like me an independent voice, all right? Access to millions of people, and there's nobody telling me what to say. But I have to be honest. There's nobody at Fox telling me what to say. For more than 20 years, nobody picked up the phone, said, o'reilly, you do this ever? Not once. Now, you could say that's because you had the biggest show and you were a star. But I wasn't always. I had a star from nothing. At Fox in 1996, we started from no audience, but nobody ever called me and told me, you got to do this, you got to do that. They knew who I was. They knew when they hired me that I would do that. But the fact that they didn't do it, a man and a lot of the other people I knew over there, they didn't intrude once in a while, but not much. But today, it's totally different. And you can almost see the fear of a lot of the broadcasters if they say something that goes against their corporate masters. Not good. Okay. Anyway, Maher told the truth, and I'm glad he did. You know, we need a guy like that on hbo, calling out both sides. So he's doing a service. Catherine Marr didn't tell the truth. She knows what the culture is. She's part of the culture. She's comfortable in the culture. Don't say it doesn't exist. Lady, you taking us for fools?
Summary of "She Didn't Tell the Truth! - Bill O’Reilly on NPR's Denial and Bill Maher Telling the Truth"
Podcast Information
Introduction
In the April 1, 2025 episode of "Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis," host Bill O'Reilly delves into the contentious debate surrounding public broadcasting entities NPR and PBS. He critiques their alleged left-leaning bias and discusses recent developments involving NPR's leadership and the role of media personalities like Bill Maher in the current political climate.
NPR and PBS Funding Critique
Bill O'Reilly begins by addressing the controversial decision by some to halt funding for NPR and PBS, estimating the annual expenditure at approximately $550 million in taxpayer dollars. He expresses strong support for stopping this funding, labeling NPR and PBS as "left-wing advocacy groups." O'Reilly argues that these organizations no longer serve as balanced public broadcasters but have transformed into outlets promoting progressive causes aligned with the Democratic Party.
Notable Quote:
"NPR and PBS do not need taxpayer money. They are left wing advocacy groups. And there's no doubt about it, there's no two sides to that story."
— Bill O'Reilly [02:15]
Alleged Bias and Leadership at NPR
O'Reilly criticizes NPR's CEO, Catherine Marr, accusing her of perpetuating a liberal culture within the organization. He references a congressional hearing where Congressman Jim Jordan questioned NPR's bias, to which Marr responded by denying any political bias in editorial decisions. O'Reilly finds her response inadequate and dismissive, suggesting that NPR's culture is inherently left-leaning and that leadership is unwilling to introduce conservative balance.
Notable Quote:
"Kathryn Marr is not going to do that because the culture @ NPR is 100% left wing... It's absurd."
— Bill O'Reilly [03:50]
Bill Maher's Commentary and Media Landscape
O'Reilly shifts focus to Bill Maher, highlighting Maher's role as a "gadfly" who critiques the progressive left despite being a liberal himself. He references Maher's skepticism about NPR's impartiality, agreeing with Maher's stance that public broadcasters have become propaganda outlets rather than objective news sources. O'Reilly emphasizes the polarization in media, noting that outlets like CNN, MSNBC, PBS, and NPR cater predominantly to liberal audiences, while Fox News dominates the conservative viewership.
Notable Quote:
"Maher told the truth, and I'm glad he did. You know, we need a guy like that on HBO, calling out both sides. So he's doing a service."
— Bill O'Reilly [05:24]
Fox News and Conservative Media Dominance
O'Reilly praises Fox News for understanding and catering to its predominantly conservative audience. He contrasts Fox's approach with other networks, asserting that Fox effectively reinforces its viewers' belief systems without corporate interference. O'Reilly also touches upon his own transition to independent media and social platforms like YouTube, which he views as avenues for unfiltered, fact-based commentary free from corporate or political mandates.
Notable Quotes:
"The audience wants their belief system reinforced."
— Bill O'Reilly [05:00]
"This commentary goes all over the world on YouTube. I love YouTube. I never have a beef."
— Bill O'Reilly [05:10]
Independent Media and Future Outlook
Concluding the episode, O'Reilly reflects on the evolution of media consumption, highlighting the fragmentation of audiences and the rise of independent voices on social media platforms. He underscores the importance of having diverse media outlets that provide factual information and varied perspectives without succumbing to political pressures or biases.
Notable Quote:
"I want knowledge. I want facts. I want perspective. You don't get that."
— Bill O'Reilly [04:30]
Conclusion
Bill O'Reilly's episode "She Didn't Tell the Truth! - Bill O’Reilly on NPR's Denial and Bill Maher Telling the Truth" presents a critical examination of NPR and PBS, arguing that these institutions have shifted from unbiased public broadcasters to entities promoting a progressive agenda. By incorporating quotes and perspectives from both himself and Bill Maher, O'Reilly emphasizes the need for balanced media representation and supports the move towards independent media platforms that prioritize factual reporting over political bias.
Notable Quotes with Timestamps
"NPR and PBS do not need taxpayer money. They are left wing advocacy groups. And there's no doubt about it, there's no two sides to that story."
— Bill O'Reilly [02:15]
"Kathryn Marr is not going to do that because the culture @ NPR is 100% left wing... It's absurd."
— Bill O'Reilly [03:50]
"This commentary goes all over the world on YouTube. I love YouTube. I never have a beef."
— Bill O'Reilly [05:10]
"Maher told the truth, and I'm glad he did. You know, we need a guy like that on HBO, calling out both sides. So he's doing a service."
— Bill O'Reilly [05:24]
"I want knowledge. I want facts. I want perspective. You don't get that."
— Bill O'Reilly [04:30]
This comprehensive summary encapsulates the core discussions and viewpoints presented by Bill O'Reilly in the specified podcast episode, providing listeners and readers with a clear understanding of the topics covered without needing to access the original content.