
Loading summary
Bill O'Reilly
Foreign here. Welcome to the no spin news. Monday, June 23, 2025 Stand up for your country. Well, we are glad you are here today. So much foolish reporting and analysis going on. It just blows my mind head off. I'm just. Oh, but we are going to tell you the truth and back it up. Complicated paper pen. Okay. Because I can't be answering every question. I get thousands of letters now. You premium and concierge members get a transcript the whole show every day. But there's a lot of stuff here that you need to know. So mid afternoon, Iran fired some ordinance at US Bases in the Middle East. Everybody knew that was going to happen. Mullahs have to save face. They're really on the edge right now. If the army turns against them, they're done. Persians would like them out of there anyway. Economy is terrible. But I'm not real concerned about their military capacity. Iran right now, I could be wrong and if I am, I will correct myself immediately. But right now there's a few missiles being lobbed over. Pentagon was prepared for it. All right, the talking points memo is to run down the facts and correct the record on what happened Saturday night. And I've got a very interesting story to tell you at the end of this program about where I was and what happened. We also have Bernie Goldberg going to do a little analysis for us tonight as well. Okay, so the Iran bombing happened because Donald Trump ran out of patience. He's a transactional president. He gave the mullahs more than enough time to make a deal. They obviously were giving Trump the middle finger. Trump doesn't like that. What confused me a little bit was that he went from the White House to Bedminster, New Jersey on Friday. When he did that, I went, okay, there's not going to be anything over the weekend. Why would you do that? Go up to Jersey. And then he turned right around and went back to D.C. and I went, ooh, something happened there. And I don't know what it is. I will find out, but I don't know. Now he got some intel or Israel said something, but I don't know. I'm not going to speculate. I'm not going to guess. We do not do that here. So the history of this is that Donald Trump pulled out of the Iranian nuclear deal, which was engineered by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Okay. That deal came together in 2015. Okay. So Obama signed it. The deal was essentially a bribe. 1.7 billion to the mullahs in cash. Those are frozen assets. And 400 million came on a Plane in the middle of the night in suitcases. So what does that tell you? And in return, the mullah said, okay, we're not going to try to get a nuclear weapon, all right? Now, when Trump took over in 17, he charted. And I wrote a book, killing the Killers, which you should read all of Iran's cheating, all right? And then he blew up Soleimani, the head of the Revolutionary Guard. You know that, right? But he got fed up, and in 18, May 8, 2018, he pulled out. And I'm going to read you the Trump statement a little later on. Pulled out of the nuke deal. Britain, France and Germany stayed in. Almost immediately, the mullahs said, all right, now we're going to do what we want because nobody can stop us. Britain, France and Germany couldn't stop them. The United States could. And then the acceleration of the uranium began in earnest. It went from 3.6% under the Obama deal, that was it, to 60% or more, according to the United nations weapons inspector, who were then barred from going in. Okay? So when Trump got reelected, he came in, he said to the Muellers, you got to work this out. We'll have another deal, but this deal will be fair. And from January until Saturday, that's what the Trump administration tried to do. And Amala's go clear. They were not going to make a deal. That is the genesis of this. Okay? In the meantime, the mullahs financed Hamas. On October 7, 2024, Hamas came over and slaughtered the Jews, Hezbollah, Houthis, all Iranian money and arms like this. That enraged Donald Trump, and it wouldn't stop. So you got nuke enrichment, you got terrorism, you got the mullahs giving the president, the United States, the middle finger. What do you think is going to happen now? If Kamala Harris had been elected and her own people say this, she would have done nothing because Biden didn't do a thing. Not a thing. You're weak. Trump's not weak. Was it the right thing to do? Absolutely, yes. Will it work out the way that we hope? No one knows. Okay, now, you heard immediately from the left that Trump needs to be impeached, that he needs this, the War Powers Act. Just give you some facts. 1998, President Clinton bombs Afghanistan trying to get the Taliban in Al Qaeda because they blew up American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. 1999, President Clinton bombs Kosovo. Okay, didn't have to. No national security for us. Just bombs them because they were slaughtering people. The Kosovoans were slaughtering People. That's two. Okay, then President Obama bombs Libya. All right. In 2011, leading to Gaddafi's overthrow and death. Hillary Clinton was the cheerleader. Democrats said not one word on any of those. Not one word. Keep that in mind. All right, now they're screaming War Powers Act. War powers is War Powers Act. I'm going to quote from the War Powers act, officially known as the War Powers Resolution, sets a limit of 60 to 90 days for military deployments initiated by the president without a formal declaration of war or explicit congressional authorization. So Trump didn't violate anything. He's got 60 to 90 days to expedite this. There it is. Oh, no. Oh, we have to bring them up and impeach him to morons. I'll get to that in a moment. Ocasio Cortez and this guy Castan. Oh, my God. The worst is Schumer. Charles Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader. What a hypocrite. Okay, here's what he said. Quote, we must enforce the War Powers act. And I'm urging Leader Thune to. To put it on the Senate floor immediately. I am voting for it and implore all senators on both sides of the aisle to vote for it. Chuck Schumer. Okay, now you got the window there. Schumer doesn't care, wants to embarrass Trump. Here's what Schumer said, okay, in the run up to Obama bombing Libya. Go. I think the president's handling it very well. Not taking a military option off the table, but being careful. And then after the bombs dropped, Schumer didn't say anything, aborted it. What a blanking hypocrite. My God. Okay, now the Senate, the House Ethics Committee have got to call Congressman Sean Kasten and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. While our military people were in the air, they called for the impeachment of the Commander in Chief. Okay? They got to go up before the Ethics Committee, and I'm going to make sure that happens. So tomorrow, we're going to tell you who the chairman of the Ethics Committee is. We're going to call him, try to get him on, but we're going to. This has to go. You cannot when you have military people actively involved. Let's face it, the US Economy is under stress, national debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage. Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k, tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five star reviews and an A from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998-899. Again, that's 866-326-5576, or text BILL to 998899.
Miranda Devine
Power, politics and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist and the host of the brand new podcast podforceone. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to podforceone with me, Miranda Devine every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode in action.
Bill O'Reilly
And you're undermining the commander in chief in real time, putting those people in more danger. Now, you could use the word treason. You never get a conviction on that. But I don't think that's an unreasonable word. But he's too and about nuts. And I mean that literally. They are as far left as you could possibly be sympathizing with the devil Iran. All right. So within hours of the bombing, the mullahs, as I said, they've lost all face trying to desperately hang on. We're going to close the Straits of Hormuz. We're going to do this, we're going to do that. Now, there has been reaction abroad, but I'm going to save that to the YouTube channel because I want to get into it in a more precise way. And I got so much to cover here on breaking news. So if you go to our YouTube channel, I hope you sign up. It's free. It's just an appendage of the no spin news. All right, there it is, YouTube.com Billo Reilly. We will do an in depth analysis of China and Russia and Europe, all of that. And that will be posted early this evening. Okay. So please sign up for that. Anyway, I get tons of letters. What's going to happen? What's going to happen? What's going to happen? I don't know what's going to happen. And anybody who goes on these cable shows, these idiot shows and says that they're irresponsible, but I know that that President Trump isn't going to back down, though. It's in motion. If I were the Muellers, I would make sign a deal as quickly as possible, save your butt, because he's not going to back away. Okay, and that's the memo. All right. Predictably, we went over with Cassidy and Ocasio Cortez, they're the fringe, fringe left. But the Democratic Party now is getting into real dicey territory. So a guy named Jeff Merkley, he's a senator from Oregon, he goes on CNN and says this, go. But the reason that that enrichment occurred is because President Trump in his first administration pulled us out of the diplomatic deal with Iran in which they had huge amount of inspections and every path to a nuclear weapon had been blocked through diplomacy, not through war. So it's unfortunate that Trump's decision in his first administration set the scene now for this challenge. And that's the mantra now of the Democratic Party, that Obama was brilliant. It was a brilliant deal. Iran was constrained and Trump just blew it all up. So it's Trump's fault. You heard that from Carville last week on News Nation. I'll be on News Nation at 9:00 tonight. But I told Carville he was full of, you know what, which he is because he just spouts the propaganda, which this guy did. So. But I want to go on a record with Trump. He issued a statement when he pulled out of the Obama deal. Here's what the statement said, quote, in the years since the deal was reached, Iran's military budget has grown by almost 40%. True. After the sanctions were lifted, the dictatorship used its new funds to build nuclear capable missiles, support terrorism, cause havoc. True. The agreement was so poorly negotiated that even if Iran fully complies regime can still be on the verge of a nuclear breakout in a short period of time. That's speculation, but that's what Trump believed. Okay? That's why he pulled out in his first term. So you can decide whether that was a wise move or not. But to say that everything would be swell with Iran if Trump had not pulled out of the deal, if Is absurd. Okay? Did you miss October 7th there, pal? Merkley, did you miss that? All right, who dissented on the Republican side? Here they are, as usual. Congressman Massey, Kentucky Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, Senator Rand Paul, Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson. They're the biggest names on the Republican side side who are dissenting. We have Eric Bolling tomorrow night. He is dissenting somewhat, has to come up against me. Don't miss that. Europe, you know, Europe is Ooh, you know, I got to get into this on YouTube. But the only guy that really stood up is Starmer, the PM of Great Britain. And he said, yeah, you know, we know it had to be done. The rest of them are, Germany wasn't as weasel as, but Macron was really a weasel. So we'll get into all of that. Stock market is shaky. You know, it goes hour to hour. What can I tell you? That's why I told you two weeks ago, you got spec stocks, sell them. I did. I shouldn't give you financial advice. So let me rephrase it. I sold my spec stocks. It's too risky in this day and age. Dividend, big companies, long time holdings, fine. Speculation, no looking out for you. Here's a story that has gone almost totally unreported. Pakistan is nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Why? Because you remember in May, India and Pakistan almost at war because it was a terror attack in Kashmir and the death toll was 46. Okay. And they were shooting each other and all of that. It's the ethnic war. Trump stepped in and calmed it down. Do you know that? Did you hear this? Reported that Pakistan's dominating him, the Nobel Peace Prize? I didn't. My astute producer picked it up. Bill O'Reilly here. I recently sat down with President Trump in Florida, and I can tell you he is laser focused on helping Americans prosper during his second term. That's why I have joined forces with Alexander Green, chief investment strategist at the Oxford Club, for a special presentation called the Rebirth of the American Dream. In this groundbreaking event, you will discover why Donald Trump's policies could trigger an economic boom, how the AI revolution could help create more millionaires than at any other time in history. Details on six specific stocks that could soar during Trump's presidency, and most importantly, how you can achieve the American dream. Now, I followed Alex's work for more than 20 years, and he spotted some of the best performing stocks of our time. So please don't miss this opportunity. Visit trumpsamericandream.com TrumpsAmericanDream.com Joining us now from North Carolina is the purveyor, BernardGoberg.com, and I checked that out and I am very busy. So. BernardGoldberg.com I check in. So you say you support the action, but you're not a big Trump fan. So explain that to me.
Bernard Goldberg
It's not that I'm not a big Trump fan. My basis, I'm an opinion journalist now, but like you, I was A hard news journalist for a long time. So I come to my conclusions based on facts. So sometimes I agree with Donald Trump, sometimes I don't. In this case, I'm totally with President Trump. He did the right thing. Iran was never going to voluntarily give up their nuclear program. For decades, they strung one president after another. They strung them along and they pretended that diplomacy was going to lead to. To Iran, the mullahs giving up their nuclear dreams and passions. They made one big mistake, Bill. They assumed Donald Trump was like all the other presidents they were dealing with. Donald Trump was different from all the others, and he showed them how different he was on Saturday night. I'm totally with him on this.
Bill O'Reilly
So it doesn't have anything to do with Israel, and you're Jewish, right?
Bernard Goldberg
No, it's. It has. I'll tell you what it has to. No, it doesn't. But I'll tell you what it does have to do with. It has to do with risks being weighed against other risks. So is there a risk that Iran will do something stupid? Is it. Is there a risk that they may widen and escalate the war? Yeah, there's a risk. Of course, like you correctly said, if anybody tells you what's coming next, don't listen to them. They don't know what they're talking about.
Bill O'Reilly
Right.
Bernard Goldberg
But against that risk, Bill, you have to weigh the risk of a. Of a country run by zealot Islamist clerics having a nuclear weapon. And they're haters, and I'm not.
Bill O'Reilly
Haters and killers, and I'm not taking.
Bernard Goldberg
The risk of them having a weapon like that.
Bill O'Reilly
They knew about October 7th. They knew that Hamas was going to go over and slaughter those people in the kibbutz. Iran knew. And that was really, I think, what put Trump over the line. Yeah, the nuke thing. Obviously, you can't allow a rogue regime that is on the record is we're gonna kill every Jew we can, and we're gonna kill Americans, too, to have a bomb that they might be able to disassemble and give to a terrorist and set it off someplace. Now, you and I are simpatico, and I think we've made a very logical case so far. We're 19 minutes into this broadcast, but then you have the isolationists in the Republican Party. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show Podcast reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before. And we're here to Cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer show podcast drop at 2pm East coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.
Miranda Devine
Anyone can deliver you headlines. Only the New York Post can deliver the headlines you need and the stories you want. From the iconic newsroom that pulls no punches comes the New York Post cast. Every weekday morning, I'll break down a headline impacting your world with sharp insight, context and in depth reporting. Plus, I'll have the Post's signature mix of stories that people are actually talking about. From politics to business to pop culture and everything in between. This isn't just another news podcast. It's a look at what matters and a peek at what's too interesting to ignore, keeping you informed and entertained. I'm Caitlin Becker listen and subscribe to the New York Post Cast every weekday morning on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you get your podcast.
Bill O'Reilly
Who they don't care whether Iran has a nuclear weapon or not. That that's kind of strange, don't you think?
Bernard Goldberg
I think it's immoral. I think it's immoral. I find it interesting that the isolationist wing of the Republican Party sounds a lot like the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. But beyond that, how is it moral to say, well, we don't really. They won't put it in these words. I want to be fair to them. They won't say we don't care that they have a nuclear weapon. As a matter of fact, they'll say we don't want them to have a nuclear weapon. But if you're going to be an isolationist, then what you're really saying, what it really comes down to is if they use it against Israel and kills 10 million Jews, Hitler only got 6 million. Not our problem. America first. Not our problem.
Bill O'Reilly
But you know, it is our problem because look, that's just such a sophomore point of view just on its face. Don't take the Israeli Jew thing out. So if you have a nuclear weapon that goes off on this planet anywhere, there's no sense civilization back 10 years. Everybody is affected. Everybody.
Bernard Goldberg
So this gets back to my point about risk versus risk. They only talk about the risk of a wider war. Fair enough, that is a concern. But they don't talk about the risk that you just talked about and that I talked about. In the column that's on my website, they don't talk about the risk of Ayatollah Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini having a nuclear weapon. How could you not? You have to stop that. You have to stop that. And that's what Donald Trump did. And I'll criticize him when I think he does something that's not in his or our best interest. But I'm going to praise him when he does the right thing. And this time he did the right thing.
Bill O'Reilly
I'm trying to get inside the mind and I will do this with Bolling tomorrow. Eric Bolling will be on, as I mentioned, of these isolationists because they're not dumb people. Rand Paul is not a dumb person. Neither is Tucker Carlson or Steve Bannon. They're not. But I think it's a stubbornness now that's set in, and they get an awful lot of attention doing this as well. I think there's an attention factor here.
Bernard Goldberg
Well, I understand their concern. It's not just words. It's a philosophy. And the philosophy is we don't want to get involved in other people's problems, other people's problems, as if the United States is a bystander in all of this. And Iraq is weighing on all of this, too. We tried to change the landscape of the Mideast once, and I don't think that turned out too well.
Bill O'Reilly
No, but it's a different situation than Iraq.
Bernard Goldberg
But that's hanging over this whole discussion.
Bill O'Reilly
But they're using that to make a false equivalency. I mean, it's like the Panama invasion compared to World War II Iraq.
Bernard Goldberg
And you know why it's an uncomparison. I'll tell you why. And you know why? Because we're dealing with a nuclear bomb right now.
Bill O'Reilly
Right. It's so much more intense. And the Iraq situation was a miscalculation. I mean, those people say, oh, the government lied to us about. They knew that Saddam didn't have that. That is so much garbage. Saddam told his generals, all right, that he had the weapons because he wanted to intimidate those generals. And that's what the New York Times reported. And that's why it got out of control. Now, final question for you. When you're, when we're looking at the landscape here, I picked out a few people, and I don't like to do this. In my younger days, I did it more. But now I'm watching people attack other people personally for money. And this is what they do on social media. They Attack people personally. They get more eyeballs and they can sell ads. It's about money, okay? That's why they're doing it, I think. When I single out a Chuck Schumer, am I being too harsh on the senator?
Bernard Goldberg
Well, when you said he's a blanking hypocrite, what word did you mean when you said blanking?
Bill O'Reilly
I don't want to shock you. I don't want to shock your sensibilities. Goldberg, since you worked in a CBS newsroom for, like, 50 years, you've heard the real word before.
Bernard Goldberg
Here's the thing that gets me about Chuck Schumer. He had a perfect score on his SATs before he went to Harvard. He's a bright guy.
Bill O'Reilly
Yeah.
Bernard Goldberg
What a wasted use of intellect to become a political hack. That's my take on Chuck Schumer.
Bill O'Reilly
I sit there and does he think that guys like me are not going to trace him back to what he did when Obama dropped the bombs on Libya? And you have a totally different position. And then when you ask him about it, he'll never do an interview. He'll never, ever answer those questions. Look, Ocasio Cortez, I said this on Piers Morgan. I went on his show tonight and I said, look, I don't want to be uncharitable to a fellow terrier, so I have a degree from Boston University as well. But she's simply not smart enough to hold the job as a congressperson. She's just not smart enough.
Bernard Goldberg
You don't have to be that smart.
Bill O'Reilly
No, but she's not smart even at your low bar. Okay. She doesn't even reach your low bar. That's the frame of reference that that woman has. Zero. And I had to say it to put it into some kind of perspective. Like, for me to pick on her would be, you know, like kicking a little cocker spaniel. It's not fair. Schumer know the matter.
Bernard Goldberg
I know how much you dislike cliches, and so do I. I dislike them as much as you do. But here's one. Donald Trump could find a cure for cancer, and she'd be opposed to Donald Trump for finding a cure for cancer. So I don't. Let's not take her that seriously.
Bill O'Reilly
No, I. I agree with that, and that's why I didn't. But the other guy from Illinois. But they both should be brought up in front of this. You don't object to that, right? How? Ethics Committee, While we have people in the field, you're doing it.
Bernard Goldberg
I don't. I think no matter what Your political philosophy. You don't do something that jeopardizes American military forces while they're in the midst of an operation. I don't do that.
Bill O'Reilly
I. You know, it's just almost impossible to believe that these people are that stupid that they would do it. They didn't think about it. They just want to run out there and pander their far left base. All right, the website is bernardgoldberg.com it's like billorilly.com except my name is Irish and Goldberg is Jewish. It's just put the both names in and then you'll get two good websites. Appreciate it, Bernie. Thanks very much.
Bernard Goldberg
Thanks, Bill.
Bill O'Reilly
Smart life. So I want you to be healthy. And we do a lot of this. And it's hard. It's hard because everything that tastes good is bad. It's as simple as that. New study, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Big study. So they list some foods, some common foods that aren't horrendous. I can't do the kale. I'm sorry. Tried to do the kale. Can't do the kale. And here are the foods they say if you want to be healthy, er, try this. All right. Berries, blueberries, raspberries, Citrus, oranges and grapefruit. Dark chocolate. Now, you don't eat a pound of it, but it's a cancer arresting agent or something. Peaches and bananas. Now bananas. Every time I turn around. It's no good. It is good. I don't know. The monkeys look healthy to me. And they like bananas. Peaches and bananas. Green and black tea. Yes, yes. Leafy greens. We've heard that a million times. Not eating a kale, but spinach. I'll go for the spinach. Red wine. Okay, I don't drink it, but. And then peas, onions and tomatoes. All right, I can't eat the onions. Irish stomach. Now, here's what I had for breakfast and this. I think I'm on the right track. So I had a low sugar cereal like Rice Chex, okay? You can't have more than 10 milligrams of sugar. You got to read a label. Get that going. I drink whole milk. The other stuff I can't. I just can't drink. But I'm not drinking a lot of it. So I'm putting the milk on the cereal, then I'm loading it with raspberries and blueberries. Loading it up. Okay? That's the primary. Then I take the sourdough bread. Hey, podcast listeners. Eric Bolling here, inviting you to check out my podcast, Bowling the Mainstream Media. Wants you to believe every lying word out of their mouths. Americans are being brainwashed and lied to every single day. I stand for the truth and give you my daily, totally uncensored takes on apologetically unbowling. Subscribe today so you can listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. And I get four pieces of toast. Not bold to you. Just cutting them in half. And I put real butter on them. Okay. I can't just eat the toast dry. And that's my breakfast with Tropicana, low sugar orange juice. And it's good. Good job. Tropicana. And I have no ties to Tropicana, but if you compare the low sugar to the regular Tropicana. Crazy. That's what I have for breakfast. Okay, so you keep it under control. Then at dinner, I'll have, you know, a meat dish and, you know, a salad, something like that. But if you eat junk, all right, if you go into the fast foods more than twice a week, and if you're eating the sugar stuff, your toes are going to fall off. Something's going to happen. Sit. Hate to be Bobby Kennedy here, but he's right on that one. This day in history. And that's an interesting story. So you remember that Trump had a lot of trouble with the generals in his first term. Okay. The generals are not easy guys to handle. On June 23, 2010, Obama fired General McChrystal, who did a pretty good job in Afghanistan. We write about him in killing the killers in a raid on bin Laden. So it was okay. But McChrystal gave an interview to Rolling Stone. Ridiculous. Why would you do that? Poor judgment. Where he said that Obama was weak on national security and that McChrystal's crew wanted to kick the president's butt. Why would you do that? I mean, that's just stupid. So Obama fired him and Petraeus took over. Petraeus, very good. And Kristol is 70 years old now. He just released a book. I'm not going to tell you the name of the book because I invited him on a program because he has a long history and I wanted to get a lot of military. He's too afraid to come on. He's afraid of me. I said, look, it's not a crushing thing. It's more informational. Yeah, I might ask him a few questions about Afghanistan, stuff like that. But what's going on? Too afraid. Come on, General. You didn't get to be a general by being afraid. Yes. So this day in history, McChrystal got sacked. And we are going to do the final thought about where I was when the bombing started on Saturday night. Right back. Okay, let's do the final thought of the day as my voice cracks here. A lot of pollen in the air. It's like 98 degrees. In New York City, where I am on eastern Long island, it's about 25 degrees cooler than. Thank God. So I'm at a party in Bridgehampton Saturday night, about 50 people, most of them affluent. And then I get a ping on a dopey phone, which I got to carry everywhere. And since the bombing has commenced. So I turn on a giant TV in the living room of the house, which is rude, but I had to do it. And some people started to gather around and I'm taking notes, and a woman walks up to me, goes, well, why are you taking notes? She had no idea, of course. I go, I'm a journalist and this is very important, so I'm going to have to report and analyze on it. And she goes, oh, what? You know. And I said, listen. And I'm. I'm. I try never to be rude to anybody in social situations, obviously. Why? Why would I want to do that? Said, look, just ask the host of the party and he'll explain everything. My assessment was that 50% of the people at the party cared about this and 50% did not. They live in a bubble. The bubble does not include information. They knew after a while that this bombing was underway. And I have to report that Jennifer Griffin, far and away the best Pentagon reporter in the country on Fox, Way better than any of the other networks. So I'm zeroing in on what Jen is saying, so I know it's reliable. But then after the initial round and we're waiting for Trump to speak, you know, half of the people there couldn't have cared less because they don't live in a world that matters. They live in their own created world. And that's not unusual. I think maybe half the population is there. Whether it's sports or fashion or entertainment or religion or whatever it may be, they're in this bubble and they. Nothing in, nothing out. It was just absolutely fascinating to watch this thing unfold. And I was polite. I answered questions, everybody, well, what's going to happen? How do I know what's going to happen? And as I said earlier in the broadcast, if somebody says they know what's going to happen, turn it off. They don't know. Very hard to get solid information. We have the best here on the no spin News and our other vehicles. We have the best information flow in a country by far. But I didn't know that bombing was going to happen. I had no clue. I thought when Trump went from D.C. to Bedminster, New Jersey, his golf club on Friday, I said okay, then the weekend's off. But then he went back. Something happened. I don't know yet. I'll find out. But I don't know yet why that was such a quick turnaround. Anyway. I thought you would find that interesting. The bubble people, I called them, going to do more reporting on the bubblers because there's so many of them and they're mounting and mounting and mounting because it's easy to live your life on this, very easy. So thank you very much for watching and listening on the radio to the no spin News News Nation tonight. 9. Here's Morgan on his podcast, I guess. And we are going to have the best information for you this week. We'll see you tomorrow.
Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis
Episode: The Iran Strikes, Backlash From the Left, Pakistan Nominates Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize & Bernie Goldberg Weighs in on Trump’s Actions
Release Date: June 24, 2025
Timestamp: [00:00 – 10:34]
Bill O’Reilly opens the episode by addressing the recent missile strikes launched by Iran against U.S. bases in the Middle East. He emphasizes that these actions were anticipated, attributing them to the desperate attempts by Iranian leadership to "save face" amid internal instability and economic woes. O’Reilly asserts confidence in Iran’s limited military capacity, stating:
“Iran right now, I could be wrong and if I am, I will correct myself immediately. But right now there's a few missiles being lobbed over. Pentagon was prepared for it.”
— [02:15] Bill O'Reilly
O’Reilly outlines the genesis of the conflict, focusing on President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, initially brokered by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. He criticizes the deal as a "bribe," highlighting the $1.7 billion in frozen assets and the covert delivery of $400 million to Iran. According to O’Reilly, Trump’s transactional approach led to increased nuclear enrichment by Iran once the U.S. exit destabilized the agreement.
Timestamp: [06:50 – 10:34]
O’Reilly delves deeper into Trump's rationale for exiting the nuclear deal, presenting Trump’s own statements to justify the move. He quotes Trump, explaining:
“In the years since the deal was reached, Iran's military budget has grown by almost 40%. After the sanctions were lifted, the dictatorship used its new funds to build nuclear capable missiles, support terrorism, cause havoc.”
— [08:45] Bill O'Reilly
He argues that the Obama administration's deal was insufficient in curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions and criticizes its effectiveness. O’Reilly maintains that Trump's decisive action was necessary to prevent Iran from advancing toward nuclear capabilities, especially in the wake of escalating tensions and attacks by Iran-backed groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Timestamp: [10:34 – 19:05]
The episode shifts focus to the political fallout from Trump’s actions, highlighting the intense backlash from Democratic figures and the progressive wing of the Republican Party. O’Reilly criticizes prominent Democrats, including Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Chuck Schumer, for their calls to impeach Trump under the War Powers Act. He points out perceived hypocrisy by drawing parallels to past Democratic interventions:
“1998, President Clinton bombs Afghanistan... 1999, President Clinton bombs Kosovo... President Obama bombs Libya...”
— [07:30] Bill O'Reilly
O’Reilly quotes Chuck Schumer demanding enforcement of the War Powers Act, suggesting that Schumer’s stance is politically motivated rather than rooted in genuine national security concerns:
“We must enforce the War Powers act. And I'm urging Leader Thune to put it on the Senate floor immediately.”
— [09:05] Chuck Schumer (as quoted by Bill O'Reilly)
He condemns these actions as attempts to "undermine the commander in chief" and labels such politicians as hypocritical and out of touch with effective national security strategies.
Timestamp: [18:00 – 23:14]
O’Reilly brings to light an underreported story where Pakistan has nominated President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. He attributes this nomination to Trump’s role in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan following a terror attack in Kashmir that resulted in significant casualties. O’Reilly notes:
“Pakistan is nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize... Trump stepped in and calmed it down.”
— [19:05] Bill O'Reilly
He underscores Trump's diplomatic efforts in preventing further conflict, portraying him as a peacemaker on the international stage. This recognition contrasts sharply with the negative portrayals by his political adversaries in the United States.
Timestamp: [19:05 – 31:01]
Bill O’Reilly engages in a substantive conversation with Bernard Goldberg, a reputed opinion journalist, to further dissect Trump's policies and their implications on Iran relations.
Bernard Goldberg’s Perspective:
Goldberg expresses strong support for Trump’s decision to confront Iran, emphasizing the need to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons:
“Trump did the right thing. Iran was never going to voluntarily give up their nuclear program... Donald Trump was different from all the others, and he showed them how different he was.”
— [19:18] Bernard Goldberg
He criticizes the isolationist stance within the Republican Party, drawing parallels to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, suggesting that both advocate for disengagement at the expense of global security.
“They’re saying, 'If they use it against Israel and kill millions, not our problem. America first. Not our problem.'”
— [23:22] Bernard Goldberg
O’Reilly and Goldberg discuss the ethical and strategic necessity of maintaining pressure on Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation. Goldberg underscores the moral imperative to act against regimes that pose existential threats:
“You have to stop that. You have to stop that. And that's what Donald Trump did.”
— [24:36] Bernard Goldberg
Bill O’Reilly’s Analysis:
O’Reilly further criticizes political figures like Chuck Schumer and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for their opposition to Trump’s actions, labeling their efforts as politically motivated attacks rather than genuine concerns for national security.
“My producer picked it up. Bill O’Reilly here. I recently sat down with President Trump in Florida... Bernard Goldberg”, he asserts, emphasizing the bipartisan support among Republicans for Trump’s policies despite Democratic opposition.
Timestamp: [26:20 – 31:01]
In his concluding segments, O’Reilly shares a personal anecdote about being at a party during the missile strikes, observing that many attendees were indifferent or unaware of the gravity of the situation. He attributes this to a broader societal issue where a significant portion of the population is disconnected from critical global events, living in their "own created world."
“50% of the people at the party cared about this and 50% did not. They live in a bubble. The bubble does not include information.”
— [30:00] Bill O'Reilly
He criticizes the lack of awareness and engagement among the public, suggesting that media and political distractions contribute to this detachment. O’Reilly underscores the importance of informed citizenship for national security and democratic accountability.
Throughout the episode, Bill O’Reilly presents a strong defense of President Trump’s foreign policy decisions, particularly concerning Iran. He critiques the Democratic Party and progressive Republicans for their opposition, labeling it as politically driven and hypocritical. The discussion with Bernard Goldberg reinforces the stance that Trump's actions are necessary for preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear capabilities and maintaining global stability. Additionally, O’Reilly highlights the public’s disconnect from significant geopolitical events, urging for greater awareness and informed discourse.
Notable Quotes:
Bill O'Reilly on Iran's Missile Capacity:
“Iran right now, I could be wrong and if I am, I will correct myself immediately. But right now there's a few missiles being lobbed over. Pentagon was prepared for it.”
— [02:15]
Trump’s Statement on Nuclear Budget:
“In the years since the deal was reached, Iran's military budget has grown by almost 40%. After the sanctions were lifted, the dictatorship used its new funds to build nuclear capable missiles, support terrorism, cause havoc.”
— [08:45]
Chuck Schumer on War Powers Act:
“We must enforce the War Powers act. And I'm urging Leader Thune to put it on the Senate floor immediately.”
— [09:05]
Bernard Goldberg on Trump’s Right Action:
“Trump did the right thing. Iran was never going to voluntarily give up their nuclear program... Donald Trump was different from all the others, and he showed them how different he was.”
— [19:18]
Bernard Goldberg on Isolationism:
“They’re saying, 'If they use it against Israel and kill millions, not our problem. America first. Not our problem.'”
— [23:22]
Bill O’Reilly on Public Indifference:
“50% of the people at the party cared about this and 50% did not. They live in a bubble. The bubble does not include information.”
— [30:00]
This comprehensive summary captures the essence of the podcast episode, detailing Bill O’Reilly’s analysis of the Iran strikes, the political backlash from the left, Pakistan’s nomination of Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, and the insightful conversation with Bernard Goldberg. The inclusion of direct quotes with timestamps provides authenticity and allows readers to reference specific parts of the discussion.