Trump's Iran Strike Opposition, Dissecting a Questionable CNN Poll, & Eric Bolling on the Isolationism Movement Within the GOP

Summary

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis Summary

Episode Title:
Trump's Iran Strike Opposition, Dissecting a Questionable CNN Poll, & Eric Bolling on the Isolationism Movement Within the GOP
Release Date: June 25, 2025

---

1. Democratic Party's Inaction on Trump's Iran Strike

Timestamp: 00:00 – 02:30

Bill O'Reilly opens the episode by highlighting the severe heatwave in New York City, using it as a metaphor for the intense political climate. He criticizes the Democratic Party's response to President Trump's recent military action against Iran, emphasizing their lack of leadership and strategic planning.

Bill O'Reilly [02:00]: "These are tough days for the Democratic Party. They really don't know how to handle the Iranian bombing."

O'Reilly argues that the Democrats fail to provide constructive criticism, lacking any viable "Plan B" to counteract Trump's decisions. He contrasts this with the responsible approach he believes should be taken when criticizing government actions.

---

2. Critique of CNN’s Interview with Senator Adam Schiff

Timestamp: 02:30 – 05:10

O'Reilly critiques CNN's interview tactics, specifically targeting Senator Adam Schiff's handling of the Iran strike. He accuses the network of biased journalism, asserting that CNN intentionally avoids presenting balanced views by only featuring critics of President Trump without offering counterpoints.

Bill O'Reilly [03:01]: "The woman on CNN interviewing him, Cassie Hunt, failed to say to Schiff, and this is journalism 101..."

He emphasizes the importance of holding interviewees accountable by asking follow-up questions that probe their solutions, something he feels CNN neglected to do.

---

3. Elizabeth Warren’s Opposition to the Iran Bombing

Timestamp: 05:10 – 10:02

O’Reilly shifts focus to Senator Elizabeth Warren, labeling her a "fanatical progressive and a socialist." He disputes her claims that Trump’s actions lack legal authority, arguing that existing intelligence and international perspectives support the necessity of the strike against Iran.

Elizabeth Warren [05:10]: "Trump has launched the United States into another potentially endless war in the Middle East."

O'Reilly counters Warren’s stance by citing intelligence reports and the geopolitical threat posed by Iran, suggesting that her refusal to consider these factors undermines national security.

---

4. Analysis of CNN and Reuters Polls on Military Action

Timestamp: 10:02 – 17:55

O'Reilly examines recent polls conducted by CNN and Reuters regarding public opinion on Trump's Iran strike. He criticizes the CNN poll for what he perceives as methodological flaws, labeling it a "push poll" designed to sway public opinion rather than accurately reflect it.

Bill O'Reilly [09:30]: "I don't believe his poll. I think it's a push poll."

Contrastingly, he references the Reuters poll, which shows a higher level of public awareness and support for the military action, suggesting that the CNN results are skewed due to a lack of voter registration among respondents.

---

5. House Ethics Committee’s Response to Criticism of the President

Timestamp: 17:55 – 27:41

O'Reilly discusses the actions of the House Ethics Committee in response to criticism from Congressman Sean Castin and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez during the bombing. He criticizes the committee's lack of transparency and cooperation, portraying it as dismissive of holds against the Commander in Chief's actions.

Bill O'Reilly [24:00]: "You cannot undermine a military action when there are US Military people in the field conducting."

He expresses frustration with the committee's secrecy and vows to hold these legislators accountable for their criticisms during ongoing military operations.

---

6. NATO Summit and Defense Spending Increases

Timestamp: 27:41 – 36:20

O’Reilly covers the recent NATO summit, celebrating the decision by member nations to increase their defense spending from 2% to 5% of GDP, a long-standing demand of President Trump.

Bill O'Reilly [30:00]: "NATO nations, with the exception of Spain, raising their defense spending to 5% from 2%, which is what Trump has wanted since 2016."

He views this as a significant victory for Trump's foreign policy, particularly in the context of supporting Ukraine and deterring further aggression from adversarial nations.

---

7. Conversation with Eric Bolling on GOP Isolationism

Timestamp: 36:20 – 30:27

Joining O'Reilly is Eric Bolling, who discusses the emergence of an isolationist faction within the GOP. Initially opposing the Iran bombing, Bolling explains his shift in stance following its perceived success.

Eric Bolling [18:38]: "If it goes no further, Bill, I'm absolutely for it, and I think it's going to go no further."

Their dialogue explores the tensions between interventionist and isolationist elements within the Republican Party, with O'Reilly advocating against isolationism and emphasizing the global implications of such policies.

Bill O'Reilly [23:09]: "If China takes, you let Taiwan go, you let Ukraine go, why would they stop then?"

Bolling acknowledges the complexity of maintaining a balanced foreign policy while ensuring national security, ultimately supporting Trump's decisive actions as necessary for global stability.

---

8. Discussion on Tariffs and Supreme Court Rulings

Timestamp: 30:27 – 33:46

O'Reilly touches upon economic policies, specifically tariffs, citing expert Torsten Slok's outlook on their effectiveness. He underscores the potential benefits of increased trade revenue while urging caution due to the unpredictable nature of economic outcomes.

Additionally, he highlights a significant Supreme Court ruling permitting Trump to deport undocumented migrants to countries of his choosing, criticizing the mainstream media for minimal coverage.

Bill O'Reilly [32:00]: "Supreme Court 63 says that Trump can send undocumented migrants anywhere in the world that Trump wants."

He asserts that this ruling represents a substantial expansion of presidential power, worthy of more attention than it received from major news outlets.

---

9. Final Thoughts and Audience Reception

Timestamp: 33:46 – 34:18

O'Reilly concludes the episode by reflecting on the positive reception of his Iran analysis on YouTube, noting significant viewer engagement and support from notable figures like Candace Owens.

Bill O'Reilly [34:00]: "As the mainstream media collapses, CNN may go out. That's how serious that is over there."

He emphasizes the growing influence of his platform in disseminating fact-based information, contrasting it with what he perceives as the decline of mainstream media reliability.

---

Notable Quotes

• Bill O'Reilly [02:30]: "When you're going to criticize someone, it is responsible to have an improvement."

• Elizabeth Warren [05:10]: "Bombing another country is an act of war."

• Eric Bolling [18:38]: "If it goes no further, Bill, I'm absolutely for it, and I think it's going to go no further."

• Bill O'Reilly [23:09]: "Isolationism has never worked, particularly in a society now that's intertwined planet-wise."

---

Conclusion

In this episode, Bill O'Reilly provides a robust critique of the Democratic Party's response to Trump's Iran strike, challenges the integrity of CNN's polling data, and delves into the internal conflicts within the GOP regarding isolationism. Through his conversation with Eric Bolling, O'Reilly underscores the importance of a strong, interventionist foreign policy to maintain global stability and counteract the influence of authoritarian regimes. The episode concludes with a commentary on economic policies and the expanding reach of O'Reilly’s platform in the face of diminishing mainstream media credibility.

Transcript

[Bill O'Reilly]

Foreign O'Reilly here. Welcome to the no Spin News. Tuesday, June 24, 2025. Stand up for your country. Well, it's 100 degrees in New York City, in the suburbs and the area. Some dome heat thing. I have no idea. A lot of whining, a lot of whining about it, you guys In Texas, Arizona, 100 degrees, you know, but here it is very, very intense. So you turn on local news and about 25 out of 30 minutes is the weather. And ABC Network News does that, too. So the weatherman comes out and goes, it's hot. Yeah, we know. And then have to drink a lot of fluids. Yeah, we know. And then if you're on fire, you call 911. It's just so banal. Word of the day. Banal. It's just unbelievable. Like, who doesn't know this? Anyway, I'm getting away from the news component of the day, but we have plenty of that for you. And the political world is very hot. Harden upon as the subject of this ev Talking points memo. So these are tough days for the Democratic Party. They really don't know how to handle the Iranian bombing. Okay? So most of them have kept quiet. There's no leadership. The zealots, far left, of course, they don't like it because they don't like anything Trump's going to do and that's that. But the party has no plan B. So when you're going to criticize someone, it is responsible to have an improvement. And this is in your personal life, too. If you're going to give somebody some jazz, say, look, this might be better. Democrats have none of that for anything. They have nothing, you know, on the budget. They, oh, don't cut Medicaid. All right, $37 trillion debt. What are you going to do about it? Nothing. They don't have anything on Iran.

[Eric Bolling]

Oh, no, no.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You have to consult. And you look at them and, oh, what's plan B? Okay, how long you want to give the mullahs? Six months, six years going on for decades. No plan. All right, so I got to run down what they're saying for you and I will do some commentary on the back of it. First, our pal Senator Adam Schiff from California. Go.

[Cassie Hunt]

So a lot of risks here for.

[Bill O'Reilly]

The country, which, you know, is the reason why you come to Congress in the first place, is the reason why our Constitution says Congress has the power to declare war. Not the president. Now, the woman on CNN interviewing him, Cassie Hunt, failed to say to Schiff, and this is journalism 101. I mean this is not anything hard. Well, that may be true in theory, but it's the War Powers act, gives the President 60 days to unilaterally use military action in situations. Did you not know that, Senator? And Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, they used bombing without any consultation to Congress whatsoever. Were you unaware of that, congressman? But instead, Ms. Hunt just sits there. Now, I don't want to criticize her. I don't watch her enough to know whether she's good or bad. But when you're doing a top flight interview undermining the President of the United States military action, you have a responsibility to your audience to be skeptical of what, you know, Schiff is going to say. You know he's going to attack it. And then you say, senator, what would you have done? Pretty precisely, we don't want any general. Well, diploma. What would you have done? No, none of that comes. And it doesn't come because CNN doesn't want that kind of exposition. They bring on Schiff. They know Schiff is going to criticize Trump and that's what they want. They don't want balance. They don't want two sides. Okay. Second one is the ardent socialist, perhaps a communist. I'm not sure yet. Bernie Sanders is a communist. No doubt in my mind. He would seize your property. Warren. I'm not sure, but she's absolutely a fanatical progressive and a socialist. Here's what she says. Go.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Trump has launched the United States into another potentially endless war in the Middle East. Bombing another country is an act of war. The Constitution is clear. If there is no immediate threat to America, Americans to our service members or to the homeland, the president has no legal authority to order our troops to strike another country. None. War with Iran will not make us safer.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Well, she's reading that at a pro abortion rally, by the way. She can't get enough abortion. Elizabeth Warren can't get enough. Okay. But anyway, she says things that are just factually incorrect and of course, somebody. So there is no immediate threat to Americans. Well, I believe that a hostile nation that has a policy of killing Jews and Americans stated policy, okay, having an atomic bomb, a nuclear weapon might be a threat. Now, there are a lot of people who just don't believe it because they don't want to believe it. They don't want to believe Mossad, they don't want to believe US intel. They don't and they won't. But the UK, MI6, every intelligence agency, and they have droves of people inside Iran, okay, say, look, these guys were really close to enriching enough uranium to make that bomb quickly. But Elizabeth Warren doesn't care about that, won't even consider it because he doesn't want to consider it. Breaks her bubble. So these are irresponsible people. Now, what did Barack Obama say about the bombing? That would be nothing. How about Joe Biden? No, Joe didn't weigh in. How about Kamala Harris? No, he's supposed to be the leaders of the Democratic Party. So if I'm the leader of the Democratic Party. All right, number one, it would be much more competitive than it is now and much more sane. Here's what I would say. We support the President's military action against Iran because he's the commander in chief and we support our troops, but we have reservations. But now is not the time. He has made his decision and we're going to support the action because we are pro American. We're not rooting for Iran. And then afterward, if we believe it was not the right thing to do, is certainly come forth with a better plan. If the leadership of the Democratic Party were to do that, then people would take it seriously. Who takes the Democratic Party seriously now? Other than the loons, the zealots, the hate Trumpers? Who? Nobody. It's the lowest ebb in modern times. Harry Truman, fdr, there's nobody close to that. Jfk, there's nobody close. Okay, finally, nobody knows about the ceasefire. It could blow up tomorrow. Trump's cursing at Israel and stuff. You know, these are volatile countries, you can't trust them. They'll do what they think is best for whatever. Let's face it, the US economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax Advantage Gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k. Tax and penalty free with billions in precious metals delivered. Thousands of 5 star reviews and an A from the Better Business Bureau. You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-5576 or text BILL to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-5576, or text BILL to 998999.

[Cassie Hunt]

If you're running a retail business, don't let disorganized order fulfillment cause chaos. Use Shipstation instead. From running a business out of your garage to multiple warehouses. Shipstation is ideal for every phase of your growth. Save time with one login for all your stores and by automating tasks. Plus, you'll get shipping rates from global carriers. Calm the chaos with the shipping software that delivers. Start a free [e-mail] audio that's shipstation.com audio all right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

The Muellers are a theocracy in Israel. They know that the Jews are in danger from these people. So you, Trump, can't control that 100%. America's a lot of power with Israel, so the ceasefire will happen. But will it hold? Nobody knows. Nobody knows. And then what happens after the ceasefire? Are there more peace talks? I don't know. I do know this, that Iran is so weak it can't close the streets of Hormuz or do anything. It can't. When it signaled to the USA that it was going to send rockets into our bases, it actually told us the Mullins told us before they fired him. What does that tell you? Don't hurt me anymore. We'll give you a tip. We got to do this for show. And that's what they did. And that's a memo. All right, now let's get to some polling. CNN poll. 10:30 adults, no registered voters, no likely voters. Democrat. 28. Republican. 28. Another party. 44. All right. What is your view of the U.S. decision to take military action? Iran approved. 44. Disapprove. 56. Second question. Do you think the U.S. military action will make Iran more of a threat? 58. Less of a threat? 27. How much do you trust Donald Trump to make the right decision about the US use of force in Iran? Great deal. Moderately. 45. Not much. 55. Now, I don't believe his poll. I think it's a push poll. And I called, I didn't call, but my producers called John McLaughlin, the Republican pollster, who is very accurate and honest, and he said the same thing. The tip off is adult respondents, not likely voters or registered voters. So you're getting in that crew, people who don't know anything they don't know. And I'm going to back that up with another poll in a moment. And when you talk to people who don't know why something's happening or even that it is happening, you're going to get a skewed answer, which is what CNN wanted. They wanted this answer. This is easy to do. And CNN understands that nobody's going to remember the poll from day to day. So they can do whatever they want to do. So Reuters poll. Reuters, the left wing News Service. Again, 1139 US adults, not registered voters. One question that's key. How closely, if at all, have you been following the Iran, Israel, USA situation? 67% say closely, 32% that we don't know anything about it. Now, that's a lot of people. Okay, 32%. So when you look at this stuff, you have to look at it with a healthy dose of skepticism. I believe, based on analysis and generalized polling, that most people understand a threat that Iran poses. Okay, now, maybe they didn't like the bombing. I don't know that for sure. But I think most people understood why it had to happen. And since there's no plan B, none. You either let them get the bomb or you bomb them. There's no middle. So I think most Americans are fine with it, but I'm not positive on that. Okay, so yesterday we said that the House Ethics Committee has to call two people who criticized the Commander in Chief while. While the bombing was underway, the planes were in the air. There would be Congressman Sean Castin of Illinois and the always amusing Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York. You cannot undermine a military action when there are US Military people in the field conducting. You cannot do that. So we call the Chairman of the House Ethics Committee, Michael Guest, who was rude to us. Rude. Okay. This guy's from Mississippi. And we had to call him back a number of times. He didn't pick up the phone. His guy, Jordan Downs, did. And they were arrogant and rude. We're not going to tell you anything. Okay? You want to go that way? We'll make you a hobby. Congressman Guest will make you a hobby here. So here's what I said about the Ethics Committee. Go. The House Ethics Committee have got to call Congressman Sean Castin and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. While our military people were in the air, they called for the impeachment of the Commander in Chief. Okay? They got to go up before the Ethics Committee, and I'm going to make sure that happens. Okay, so now we have a conundrum because the head of the Ethics Committee citing confidentiality. That's bull. All right? So I can't talk to you. Yeah, you can. I don't know what game you're playing, Mr. Guest, but we're going to watch you. Now you're on our scope. I want to try to get somebody else on a committee to come in here and explain this. I do believe that we're going to have to call these two people in front of the Ethics Committee. But I was disappointed with this guy. Guest. If you're in his district in Mississippi, you might give him a call. This is ridiculous. It's just totally absurd. Trump's in a Hague. That's in Holland, the Netherlands. NATO summit. Good news for the President. The NATO nations, with the exception of Spain, raising their defense spending to 5% from 2%, which is what Trump has wanted since 2016. He finally got it. Finally got it. A lot of that's because of Ukraine. Zelensky is at this meeting. We don't have anything right now concrete. We're obviously following it now. The opposition to Trump's Iranian decision didn't always come from the left. There were some conservative people who didn't like it, and they're isolationist people. One of them is Eric Bolling. I think, I think it. Because I can't quite make out Bolling's point of view. Roll a tape.

[Eric Bolling]

So MAGA kind of has always believed that Trump was not going to be involved in foreign wars. This is a bit of a. Well, a certain faction of MAGA believes that this is, this is a tough pill to swallow, that we're actually bombing another country, especially because could it lead to World War Three?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay. So joining us now is the effervescent Eric Bolling from West Palm beach, where he's tanned, locked and, and loaded.

[Eric Bolling]

He does program and never banal for the.

[Bill O'Reilly]

And thank God. Thank God for that. He does a program bowling on Real America's Voice. So bowling. Are you for or against the bombing? Just yes or no.

[Eric Bolling]

Yes, I'm for or against the bombing. Let me explain, if I may. I was against the bombing because I hate the idea of, of an American pilot in harm's way.

[Bill O'Reilly]

I don't. So you first. At first you were against it.

[Eric Bolling]

Further explained that I was against it because we had complete. Or not we. I'm sorry, I correct myself because Trump did the same thing. Prior to the bombing, Israel had complete control of the airspace over Tehran, over the whole country of Iran. They were getting things done. I loved what they were doing. They were relentless. People were saying, okay, you know, you made your point in Israel. No, no, no. They were going to finish the job. Now, did they have the 200 mile into the side of the mountain bunker busters? They didn't at the time. And then the. My side or my brain, this side of my brain would say, okay, we'll sell it to him. Sell Israel the, the bunker buster bomb. Sell them in the mop, mop. Train a pilot. I don't Care if it takes a month. Train the pilot how to fly it. How's this? Get a dual citizen Israeli American pilot to fly it over, Drop the bag. We wouldn't have our fingerprints.

[Bill O'Reilly]

None of that, none of that would ever happen in any way at all. Because we are the only people in the world that have that technology. We're going to hand it off to Israel, okay? And there's not going to be any pilots that are not under under the supervision of the Pentagon. Never, ever going to happen now that they're bombing. Now that the bombing has happened.

[Eric Bolling]

Yes, yes, yes, yes. Now, I look back at so far, we're what, 36 hours out, and it looks like a surgical strike. That was precision. It was, as Pete Hegseth tells us, it obliterated the nuclear capabilities.

[Bill O'Reilly]

We all know that. Are you for it or against it? Now.

[Eric Bolling]

If it goes no further, Bill, I'm absolutely for it, and I think it's going to go no further. Because Trump said this morning before Air Force One, Marine One, and saying Israel and Iran, they don't know what the f. They're doing. Use the word. And I think he told the world that was one and done, and we're done. And it was, it was, it was magical. It was almost spiritual. I think back to the day Trump was shot in the ear in Butler, Pennsylvania. Bill, just bear with me one second. One inch either way. Now, I'm not just saying one inch towards his head would have killed the would be next president, but one inch away from his ear. And yes, it would have been an assassination attempt. It wouldn't have the. The massive implications it does, but those of if you believe in God, if you believe in a higher power, if you believe in the spirit, whatever you believe in, there's a reason he got hit in the air and not taken out and not missed them completely. And this may be the reason, because what he did in the last 36 hours made the world a safer place.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, so now you've evolved on that, but you're still essentially an isolationist and you don't support funding Zelensky in Ukraine. Or am I wrong on that?

[Eric Bolling]

No, you're 100% right.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You don't want any money going to Ukraine, right?

[Sean Spicer]

Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer show podcast reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before. And we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer show podcast drop at 2pm East coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist and the host of the brand new podcast podforceone. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to podpors one with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode, correct?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay.

[Eric Bolling]

Correct.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So if, if we pull out back and Putin takes the whole country, which is what he wants to do, then, you know, China goes to Taiwan, takes that. Is that okay with you?

[Eric Bolling]

I mean, is it okay? I think a smart president would beef up our chip capacity, chip producing capacity in the United States because frankly, Taiwan, the best interest to us in Taiwan is their ability to produce Silicon Valley type chips. If we can up our our game with Nvidia and the other chip makers, even Taiwan Semiconductor, for that matter, I think it's none of our business.

[Bill O'Reilly]

If China takes, you let Taiwan go, you let Ukraine go, why would they stop then? Why wouldn't Putin then go to Moldova? Why wouldn't China then move into South Korea and help the nut in North Korea destabilize that? So in isolation is basically saying, you.

[Eric Bolling]

Know, that that's, that's illegal. You don't know, may have have eyes on the prize with other, you know, other countries in Europe.

[Bill O'Reilly]

There's no guarantee of anything other than my eyewitness report when I was in China. And I can tell you the 100% certainty. If Putin's allowed to take over Ukraine, then China will march into Taiwan. That's what will happen 100%. So if you're okay with that, how.

[Eric Bolling]

Will that affect you?

[Bill O'Reilly]

Bill O'Reilly, how it will affect is it causes chaos in the world. It destabilizes the entire world. When you have two chaotic, when you have a crazy world, hey, when you have two totalitarian regimes expanding and taking over, foreign countries invading and taking over, you do not have a safe world. You cannot hide in Idaho and worldwide economy will just be battered and you think it's bad now the conflicts, where do you see the chaos that those totalitarian nations will cause if not restrained. And this is history bowling. And you can't argue history with me because I'll, you know, I'll dissolve you into pudding. But it's history. All right. Isolationism has never worked, particularly in a society now that's intertwined planet wise.

[Eric Bolling]

I don't necessarily think I'm a total isolationist. I'm a anti war America first human being.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But America's not going to be first. China will be first.

[Eric Bolling]

We still are part of NATO. And I've never said remove.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You don't want military action.

[Eric Bolling]

Well, if you really don't want Putin to take Ukraine, put him in NATO and then you've opened yourself a whole.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Putin's not going to go.

[Eric Bolling]

Put Ukraine in NATO, put Ukraine in NATO, allow Ukraine to enter NATO.

[Bill O'Reilly]

That would give more justification. If you allowed Ukraine into NATO, that would heighten Putin's justification to the Russian people, to the only people that can stop them at this point.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Point.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right, so now you have, you're an isolationist. Bannon is Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson is. How big do you think that constituency is within the Republican Party, the isolationist movement? How big is it?

[Eric Bolling]

You know, I think it was huge until Trump decided to go forth with this. Like I think a lot of we, many of us, I call Steve Bannon the true north of the original gangster MAGA crew was the original don of that. And, and I think until Trump actually went forward in, in Iran with a bombing that, that split people. Then they put people like Tucker, I think Tucker was more, more the hardliner against it. And Steve and, and the Hannity and Mark Levin were very much, very much pushing for Trump to go ahead and.

[Bill O'Reilly]

But where are we now? Now where are we in your opinion?

[Eric Bolling]

I think there's a, there's a, there's a SW split in MAGA that needs to be 50, 50 split. Maybe 60, 40 in favor of what Trump did. Maybe 70, 30 in favor of.

[Bill O'Reilly]

You don't know. All right, because I don't know either. I mean, I suspect that most Republicans support Trump in this action. Now if it goes south and all of these other things happen, unintended consequences, which Iran is too weak to really make anything happen but say something crazy did happen, then you would get more people, more would come over to the isolationist movement. All right, last word.

[Eric Bolling]

I mean, to do anything aggressively, they're not too weak to, you know, to fortify and finance their sleeper cells and their, their Houthis and their laws and always going to attack us internally on a smaller basis.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Which, but that's not because they're going to. They're already here. They just made a big bus. They just made a big bus in.

[Eric Bolling]

Connecticut of the 2 million Iranians who are in this country. Caught 11, which is great.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Biden let them all in.

[Eric Bolling]

Even want ice around Biden let them all in.

[Bill O'Reilly]

So they're already here. They don't need an excuse. Okay. They're here and they're not here to get a job at 7:11. Last question for you. The final word on this isn't going to be until Trump leaves office. Okay. Because it's not like Iran. They may go away. The army may overthrow them all. Let's hope. But Putin, he's a psychotic. I mean, you're reading my book now. I know Confronting Evil. And when you see how psychotic that man is, that we need a strong leader and there have been accusations that Trump is too soft about Putin. There have been accusations he's too soft on him. So we're never going to have a peaceful world. Last word.

[Eric Bolling]

I 100% agree, by the way, your book is phenomenal. This is the best book you've written. I've read. I just started, I received it yesterday, started paging through it last night, started reading it. So I want to just have a little bit of a, an idea what is about. It's gripping. It's really, it's your best work so far with the, maybe the exception of you throwing JP Morgan and Rockefeller into the mix with evil, with the evil people.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They are evil.

[Eric Bolling]

But we'll get back to. We could talk about that another time. But it was fascinating how you take people from this man won't be alive at the end of the day or tomorrow. And then you explain why and then you go back to the roots of the evil that's causing so much of the evil in the world. It's fantastic book. Where are we going from here? I, I would say MAGA needs to, needs to get, get their self together again. Figure it out and again, hopefully it's done. Hopefully we're finished. Hopefully.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Absolutely.

[Eric Bolling]

Nobody wants to give, give nukes to Iran or hopefully China doesn't give nukes to.

[Bill O'Reilly]

They're not going to give.

[Eric Bolling]

That may escalate it and that would, that would be bad. But I think right now Donald Trump has proven to the world that. You don't dispute Donald Trump. I dispute his ideas on tariffs. And so far I'm wrong. I didn't think we should attack Iran as of, you know, this day right now, today.

[Bill O'Reilly]

All right.

[Eric Bolling]

Probably wrong.

[Bill O'Reilly]

We won't know until the end of.

[Eric Bolling]

The year and I hope I'm wrong forever.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Okay, I'm going to do tariffs now. We won't know until the end of the year. Bowling. Thanks very much, everybody. Check out bowling. All right. On Real America's Voice and we'll talk again soon. Thanks, Eric. All right. So the tariff thing, we'll know to the end of the year whether this is successful or the American economy. This guy named Torsten Slok. Nice name, Torsten Slok. Slok works for Apollo Global Management. He was real anti Trump tariffs when they first renounced. Here's what he said. Tariffs have been implemented in a way that has not been effective. There is now a 90% chance of what can be called a voluntary trade reset recession. 90% chance. Whoa. Well, this week Mr. Slock change his mind. Here's what he says. Now, this would seem to be like a victory for the world and yet produce 400 billion of annual revenue for the US taxpayer. Trade parties will be happy with only 10% tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us on quote. Well, he's too optimistic on the tariffs. You got to wait. You got to wait because you know, the economy takes a while, okay? It's all over the place. It's not like boom, boom, boom. But if it does work, then it will obviously help our debt, our deficit and our manufacturing base. Supreme Court lifts limits here. This story has not been covered because it's a pro Trump story. So Supreme Court 63 says that Trump can send undocumented migrants anywhere in the world that Trump wants. Okay, There was a stay on that. Judge Brian Murphy, M.A. of course, a judge shop put a stay on it. Supreme Court said no, sorry, Judge Murphy, the president of the United States has power to deport people here illegally and he can send them wherever he wants to send them. That's a lot of power. I'll tell you what. Supreme Court so Nightly news on NBC cut 18 seconds. CBS Evening News 13 seconds. ABC World News didn't cover it at all because all they do is weather. And so I'm looking at this going pretty big ruling. Nah, no coverage.

[Cassie Hunt]

Anyone can deliver you headlines. Only the New York Post can deliver the headlines you need and the stories you want. From the iconic newsroom that pulls no punches comes the New York Post cast. Every weekday morning, I'll break down a headline impacting your world with sharp insight, context and in depth reporting. Plus, I'll have the Post's signature mix of stories that people are actually talking about. From politics to business to pop culture and everything in between, this isn't just another news podcast. It's a look at what matters and a peek at what's too interesting to ignore, keeping you informed and entertained. I'm Caitlin Becker. Listen and subscribe to the New York Post Cast every weekday morning on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you get your podcast.

[Eric Bolling]

Hey podcast listeners, Eric Bolling here inviting you to check out my podcast Boeing. The mainstream media wants you to believe leave every lying word out of their mouths. Americans are being brainwashed and lied to every single day. I stand for the truth and give you my daily, totally uncensored takes on apologetically unbowling. Subscribe today so you can listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Chicago Tribune is warning New York City so is a mayoral Democratic primary today. So you got a socialist running and he's doing pretty well in the polls. And the Tribune is warning New York City you better not elect a socialist. So here's the quote. Chicago Mayor Brian Johnson's approval rating cratered in his second year. Johnson is a socialist reflection of how quickly progressive promises collapse under the weight of governance. In Chicago's financial reality, sound of Gooden theory is translated into dysfunction driven by fiscal missteps. Political experience. Johnson one of the most progressive mayors in the U.S. but Mamdani, inarguably is even more radical. And it's true. So if New Yorkers put him in, the city will collapse economically. It's going to happen. Everybody knows it. And why would you vote for a guy like that? Because millions of people in New York City have given up. They don't believe they can compete in the capitalistic system. They want socialism. They want the government to provide. That's what's happening here in New York. Smart Life Coffee So this study 47,000 Women Society American Society for Nutrition says women who drink one to three cups of caffeinated coffee a day in their 50s, more likely to reach older age, free from major chronic diseases, with good cognitive, physical and mental health. So it's saying ladies, if you're 50 or over should be drinking one to three cups of coffee now. I don't know. I drink maybe one or two a day. Some days I don't drink any and I never go to Starbucks. Why? Because an iced chestnut praline latte cost more than $8 in New York. I mean, just an average cup of coffee star is five bucks I can't. If they could prove it would make me live. Nah, I wouldn't even do it then. But sp. Smart life, Middle aged women. If you drink the coffee, they say you're going to be healthier when you're old. Don't know. Just passing it on is an interesting story. So you remember Dr. O' Connor, President Biden's personal physician, who said Biden was the greatest. He was in tremendous health mentally and physically. He's going to be subpoenaed now, as I suggested in front of the House Oversight Committee. That's James Comer in July. Now, the excuse was that o' Connor said, I can't give you a sworn affidavit, which is what Comer asked for because it would violate doctor patient privilege. Well, let Biden say. Okay, go ahead. Right. No. So they got a call and they subpoenaed him. And that will be fascinating. Stay in history. June 24, 1987. Actor and comedian Jackie Gleason died 38 years ago. He was 71. Colon cancer. They called him the Great One. He was born in poverty. Irish immigrants, Brooklyn Bed Stuy was born in. And he had talent. Funny guy. And he got his big break in a sitcom called Life of Riley. I remember my parents watching that. I think the Riley O'Reilly connection. I was about four. Gleason was second to William Bendix. Then Gleason got his own program, the Honeymooners. Roll it.

[Jackie Gleason]

I gave you an order. The master gave you an order this morning. But as I look around, I see that my order from from the Master wasn't carried out. Now the Master's wife is supposed to obey. Why didn't you obey and have my robe and slippers laid out so that when I come home from a hard day's work, they're there for me to slip into conveniently. Tut, tut. None of your feeble excuses. I can see that you're ashamed of yourself. The Master forgives you. I'll not say another word about it. Just run in the act, get my robe and slippers and I'll call the whole thing off. The Master has spoken. Now that you got your gas bag filled, why don't you blow away.

[Bill O'Reilly]

Now there's no way you could do that today. And Glen wouldn't even rehearse. Glean came in. Oh, he's live. They did 37 honeymooners and live. And Art Carney and Gleason and Audrey Meadows and Joyce Randolph. They. The other three would rehearse. Gleason would he just come bombing in. Brilliant stuff, but the cultural difference. And Audra Maddow is fabulous, just fabulous. All right, Jackie, we one of the great entertainers. Yes. Young people. Jackie Gleason. No idea. They all kind of die out, you know. Pardon. Upon back with the final thought about critiques of our YouTube channel. Okay, final thought. We got about a million subscribers on our YouTube channel. We told you about a couple of minutes ago. That's a lot. We're going for 2 million. We'll get them. And we had a lot of comments about my Iran analysis on the bonus commentary on YouTube. Here are some of them. Got 30,000 likes in two minutes and 99% positive reaction. More than 700,000 watched yesterday's Iran content on YouTube. 700,000. And remember, we go on at night. That's not full day. That's like four hours. Huge. Enormous. Then I had somebody write in. Thank you, Bill. Listen to Candace Owens got confused by her anger and unhappiness with President Trump. So I came to you. I feel much better. I just gave you the facts. That's all. I do the facts. And then we had another one. I'm irritated by the lack of reliable information. Thank goodness we have O'Reilly. We will not deceive you. So we are expanding our business. As you probably figured out. I'm a Luddite. I don't know anything about it, but I got good people who understand the Internet. And our distribution system is very wide now. You add it all up and I'm probably reaching more people than I reached on the O'Reilly Factor. It's hard to calibrate that because we're all over the world now. But it's powerful. And we're getting stronger and stronger and stronger. And as the mainstream media collapses, CNN may go out. That's how serious that is over there. And then we're rising because fact based facts, facts, facts. Thank you for watching us today. I'm Bill O'Reilly. We'll see you again tomorrow.