Netflix Amends Warner Bros. Deal to All Cash in Bidding War

Summary

Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast Summary

Episode: Netflix Amends Warner Bros. Deal to All Cash in Bidding War
Date: January 20, 2026
Hosts: Scarlet Fu, Paul Sweeney
Key Guests: Geetha Ranganathan (Bloomberg Intelligence Media Analyst), Henrietta Trace (Veda Partners), Mark Champion (Bloomberg Opinion)

---

Overview

This episode offers deep analysis of two headline-grabbing stories:

1. Netflix's move to amend its Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition offer to all-cash, escalating the rivalry with Paramount and accelerating deal timelines.
2. The geopolitical and economic drama around President Trump's aggressive push for US control over Greenland, the resulting trade tensions with Europe, and the broader impact on international relations and US domestic politics.

---

Section 1: Netflix Amends Warner Bros. Deal to All Cash

(Starts at 02:25)

Main Theme

Netflix has shifted its acquisition bid for Warner Bros. Discovery from a mix of cash and stock to an all-cash offer, hoping to strengthen its position over Paramount’s competing bid and address investor concerns about Netflix’s falling share price.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

• Investor Perception and Bid Dynamics
  • Netflix’s move settles an ongoing debate about the value superiority of Paramount’s all-cash offer versus Netflix’s previous stock/cash mix. (Geetha Ranganathan, 02:56)
  • Accelerates the timeline for a shareholder vote on the acquisition, now expected in April instead of June.
• Paramount’s Position and TV Networks Value
  • Paramount must now respond to Netflix’s competitive all-cash move, likely by increasing or sweetening its own bid. (Geetha Ranganathan, 04:00)
  • A critical question: What is the standalone value of the TV networks not included in the Netflix bid? Paramount has argued that these networks are essentially worthless, citing analogies with low valuations on other recent cable spinoffs.
  • However, filings from Discovery suggest that spun-off TV assets (e.g., CNN, international networks) could be worth between $0.50 and $7 per share depending on disposal scenarios. (Geetha Ranganathan, 04:00)
• Immediate Timeline
  • Paramount faces a tender offer deadline tomorrow; the expectation is for a potential extension or an enhanced offer.
  • The next procedural step in the merger process will be regulatory review, especially given the all-cash nature and industry consolidation questions. (Geetha Ranganathan, 05:36)
• Regulatory Uncertainty
  • Netflix is preparing arguments to calm regulatory fears, pledging to preserve the HBO and theatrical businesses, which were initial deal flashpoints.
  • Expectations are that US regulators are more likely to approve vs. anticipated tougher scrutiny in the EU due to antitrust issues. (Geetha Ranganathan, 06:11)

Notable Quotes

• “Netflix really aims to... first of all to show David Zaslav and Warner Brothers Discovery shareholders the money. So they're going cash and they're basically saying that we want to really get this deal on a fast track here.”
  — Geetha Ranganathan (02:56)
• “The ball is now squarely in Paramount’s court. They have to increase or sweeten their bid.”
  — Geetha Ranganathan (04:00)
• “The spinoff of the cable networks will actually bring [Warner] more value... and this is why they're kind of leaning towards that Netflix offer.”
  — Geetha Ranganathan (04:38)
• “I think the next big question mark is obviously what are the regulators going to say about this deal.”
  — Geetha Ranganathan (05:36)
• “Anything below 13% [revenue growth]... not good for Netflix.”
  — Geetha Ranganathan (07:34), on what to watch for in the upcoming earnings report

Timestamps for Major Segments

• [02:25] - Netflix switches bid to all-cash; rationale and anticipated effects
• [04:00] - Paramount’s possible response; debate on TV network valuations
• [05:36] - Timeline, regulatory hurdles, global vs. US perspectives
• [07:34] - Key metric for Netflix’s upcoming earnings: revenue growth guidance for 2026

---

Section 2: US-Greenland Saga & European Tensions

(Starts at 10:52; Mark Champion interview at 20:07)

Main Theme

President Trump’s insistence on asserting US control over Greenland is causing severe friction with European allies, undermining trade deals, and exposing divisions within both American and European political worlds.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

• Trade Deal Fallout and Tariff Threats
  • The US-EU trade deal has effectively collapsed as the EU suspends plans to remove industrial tariffs, likely reverting to higher tariffs. (Henrietta Trace, 11:38)
  • The administration is using the Greenland controversy as a leverage tool in trade and diplomatic negotiations.
• Domestic Political Backlash
  • Unprecedented public opposition: Polls show 80–83% of Americans oppose the Greenland move—a near-unanimity unrivaled even by popular consumer items. (Henrietta Trace, 13:26)
  • Trump’s overt focus on Greenland is interpreted as a “lame duck” pivot to foreign policy, with legislative gridlock expected for the rest of his term.
• Shutdown & Health Care Stalemate
  • While lawmakers are likely to avert a shutdown by passing appropriations, health care (especially ACA exchange subsidies) remains completely gridlocked. (Henrietta Trace, 15:44)
  • No major legislation is expected from Congress in 2026; stopgap measures and bailouts (e.g., for farmers) are likely to continue. (Henrietta Trace, 16:39)
• European Response & Strategic Weakness
  • Europe is incensed by US actions and the instrumental use of trade threats but is hampered by broader reliance on NATO and US security commitments.
  • As Mark Champion argues, power (not principle) will ultimately determine outcomes: Europe lacks the leverage to mount sustained resistance, especially in defense matters (Mark Champion, 20:37)
  • The US appears to be exploiting EU unity weaknesses, potentially using “divide and conquer” tactics by encouraging splintering and exploiting NATO dependencies. (Mark Champion, 23:19)
  • The real risk for Europe is its inability to operate independently without US defense backing; such capabilities are “ten years away at least” (Mark Champion, 23:52)

Notable Quotes

• “I have never seen the American public so unified in opposition to a single item. I don't think this many Americans like ice cream or Disney World, you know. It's something like 80 to 83% of Americans oppose this Greenland move.”
  — Henrietta Trace (13:26)
• “Greenland is actually an excellent replacement for tariffs because it keeps those EU and UK and other NATO allies incredibly focused on the US... and they don't have to necessarily hit back with tariffs, which the domestic audience in the United States cannot stomach anymore.”
  — Henrietta Trace (11:38)
• “These things are ultimately not determined by principle, but by power. And Europe lacks the power. Trump has that leverage, not necessarily because of trade. [...] The real problem is that they are so dependent in terms of security. They care about NATO. He does not.”
  — Mark Champion (20:37)
• “The risk, real risk for the Europeans is that they are not ready to give up that alliance. They still depend too much on, on the US nuclear umbrella, too much on NATO, you know, US assets within NATO to have a kind of, you know, meaningful deterrent against fully militarized countries such as Russia or China. And it's going to be, you know, they're ten years away at least from being able to stand on their own.”
  — Mark Champion (23:52)

Timestamps for Major Segments

• [10:52] - President Trump’s Greenland mission and trade tensions overview
• [11:38] - Fate of the US-EU trade deal, use of Greenland as political leverage
• [13:26] - American public opposition and political ramifications for the administration
• [15:20] - Likelihood of a US government shutdown; congressional progress
• [15:44] - Ongoing legislative impasse over health care
• [16:39] - Legislative paralysis forecast for 2026
• [20:07] - Mark Champion: Europe’s predicament in confronting US over Greenland
• [23:19] - Divide-and-conquer strategies and Europe’s dependency on US defense

---

Memorable Moments

• Public Unity Against Greenland Policy:
  “I've worked on elections from Texas to Rhode Island for 20 years now. I have never seen the American public so unified in opposition to a single item.”
  — Henrietta Trace (13:26)

• Power versus Principle in Global Affairs:
  “These things are ultimately not determined by principle, but by power.”
  — Mark Champion (20:37)

---

The Bottom Line

• Netflix: By going all-cash, Netflix is escalating its bid and seeking regulatory and shareholder approval faster, creating pressure on Paramount and potentially shaping the direction of media mergers for years to come.
• Greenland Geopolitics: President Trump’s Greenland ambitions are redrawing lines in US-European relations, undermining trade negotiations, and exposing both transatlantic and domestic vulnerabilities—as well as the complexities of modern power politics.

---

This summary distills the essential insights and exchanges from the episode, prioritizing the original language and analytical tone of the hosts and expert guests. The focus is exclusively on substantive content, omitting advertisements and non-topical interludes.

Transcript

[Nathan Hager]

Ditch the complexity. Intuit Enterprise Suite delivers AI native ERP power that is intuitive and intelligent. Scale faster with advanced control. Getting started in days, not months. Learn [e-mail] Enterprise and get the power you need.

[Paul Sweeney]

Support for the show comes from public on public. You can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index with AI. It all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Public.com Announcer]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete Disclosures available at public.comDisclosures being a.

[Nathan Hager]

Small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools. Plus access online resources designed to help your business thrive. Learn [e-mail] business chase for business make more of what's yours the Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank Naomi Member FDIC Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase Co.

[Bloomberg Intelligence Host]

Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio news. You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 10am Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

[Paul Sweeney]

Well, Netflix back in the news today. They're amending their offer for Warner Brothers discovery to an all cash deal. It was cash and stock now going all cash, believing that that will strengthen their bid. They've also got earnings after the close here, so a lot to talk about on the Netflix front. Which means we want to check in with Geetha Ranganathan. She covers all the media stocks for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based down in Princeton here. So Geetha, what did you make of Netflix today? Kind of amending their offer to an all cash offer?

[Mark Champion]

Yes.

[Geetha Ranganathan]

So this really, Paul, puts to rest this ongoing investor debate about whether, you know, the Paramount $30 all cash bid for all of Warner is really, in fact superior to Netflix's bid, which was a, which is a combination of both stock and cash, especially since the value of Netflix stock has been declining now for, for many months. So I think what Netflix really aims to do here is to, to first of all to show David Zaslav and Warner Brothers Discovery shareholders the money. So they're going cash and they're basically saying that we want to really get this deal on a fast track here because this will speed up the shareholder vote. It will now happen sometime in April. It was previously supposed to happen sometime in June. So they're really kind of getting going here and putting the money where their mouth is.

[Paul Sweeney]

First thing. When I saw this news this morning, Geetha, I put my old banker hat back on. I said, boy, it seems like Netflix is bidding against itself because we haven't heard any kind of counter bid from Paramount here. What do you think's going on behind the scenes with both of these bidders?

[Geetha Ranganathan]

Yes, so you know, Paramount, obviously they've been constantly insisting, you know, about the superiority of that $30 all cash offer. With Netflix having, having changed its bid to an all cash bid, I think the ball is now squarely in Paramount score. They have to have to increase or sweeten their bid. You know, one of the things, Paul, that has been constantly debated is the value of the TV networks. That is the remaining portion of the business that Netflix will not acquire. So this will be spun off by Warner Brothers Discovery. Paramount has argued that those TV networks are actually worth nothing. That's what they've said. And they've based their argument just, you know, kind of on the performance and the valuation of Versant, which is the Comcast cable network spinoff. But Discovery actually put out a filing today and it, it basically suggests that, of course there's a huge range for those cable TV networks, but they value them anywhere from about A$50 a share to as high as $7 a share. And they kind of lay out many different scenarios, basically suggesting that, you know, some of those networks, like a cnn, like some networks, international networks in Poland, could actually be sold and, you know, a lot more shareholder value could be extracted, so to speak. So I think Warner Brothers still believes that the spinoff of the cable networks will actually bring it more Value. And this is why they're kind of leaning towards that Netflix offer.

[Paul Sweeney]

What's the timing here? Do we wait until the shareholder vote until April or do we expect something to happen? Seems to be dragging along here a little bit.

[Geetha Ranganathan]

Yeah, it is. So actually, tomorrow is a very important day, and I say that because tomorrow is the deadline for the Paramount tender, which is the $30 tender. So expect something to happen. Either Paramount extends that offer or they basically have to sweeten the bit. So. So something definitely should have happened tomorrow. If nothing happens, then we'll have to wait and watch and see what happens now on the regulatory front, because now that we have all the financial terms in place, I think the next big question mark is obviously what are the regulators going to say about this deal.

[Paul Sweeney]

And what's the early thinking there?

[Geetha Ranganathan]

So it's a little bit of a mixed bag here and it's going to be really interesting to see what Netflix actually does. So they've kind of laid out many different arguments which I think kind of sued regulator fears, kind of not have too much of regulatory scrutiny. So they've said that they're going to maintain the HBO business, they're going to maintain the theatrical business. These were all big question marks when they initially announced the deal. One of the big things that we are kind of looking for tonight when Netflix reports earnings, is what their stance is going to be on price increases. So the last time that they raised prices in the US was last January, so exactly 12 months ago. And typically they have this cadence of increasing prices every 12 to 18 months. So it's going to be interesting to see whether they are going to take that chance and go ahead and raise prices or in fact, stay away from raising prices, thus making the case to regulators that they're more pro consumer and they're kind of, especially when the deal is kind of in regulatory crosshairs. So a lot of things here still kind of waiting to unfold, Paul, but it's going to be a very different process here in the US where it seems like that regulators might give Netflix a green signal, but I think it's going to be much tougher for them in the EU where, where they do have much higher antitrust issues.

[Paul Sweeney]

30 seconds left here, Geeth. The company Netflix is reporting after the close here. Aside from this deal flow, what else are you looking for?

[Geetha Ranganathan]

I think the number one thing that everybody is going to look for is revenue guidance for 2026. And one of the things that the deal, the concerns that it raised is is revenue growth going to slow? Is revenue growth slowing? Is that why they bought Warner? And so anything below 13%? 13% is the consensus number right below 13% not good for Netflix.

[Paul Sweeney]

Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this Is your business outgrowing your current systems? Are you tired of the cost and crushing complexity of traditional ERPs? Meet Intuit Enterprise Suite, the AI native ERP that simplifies complexity and adapts with your business. It's enterprise grade power made intuitive, intelligent, adaptive and ready for what's next. Built for modern finance teams, Intuit Enterprise Suite helps you streamline complex financial management and gain real time visibility across all your entities. This AI native solution automates workflows and unifies your data, acting as a force multiplier for your team. You no longer have to migrate off Intuit as you grow. Get the advanced accounting and multi entity control you expect, but in a solution that finance teams actually enjoy using best of all. It's quick to adopt, letting you get going in days, not months. Scale with confidence. Get the power of ERP without the complexity. Learn [e-mail] Enterprise Today and Future Proof your business support for the show comes from public on public you can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers growing revenue over 20% year over year, you can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks. Generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Public.com Announcer]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures [e-mail] disclosures these days it.

[Okta Announcer]

Seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, OKTA helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise. With Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

[Bloomberg Intelligence Host]

You'Re listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 10am Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app Listen on Demand wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

[Nathan Hager]

Well, the president is on a mission. He is determined to gain control of Greenland, and he has made that his central issue as he makes his way to Davos tomorrow to speak with global leaders. And in doing so, he's breaking all kinds of diplomatic norms, sharing Emmanuel Macron's personal text to him and essentially mocking him. So new things are happening every day. Let's bring in Henrietta Trace. She is managing partner and director of Economic Policy at Veda Partners. Henrietta, help us make sense of what is happening here when it comes to Greenland and the president threatening perhaps the EU trade deal that was struck last year, threatening to impose more tariffs even as we await a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of those tariffs.

[Henrietta Trace]

Yeah, I think you just nailed two of the three reasons we are talking about Greenland. The first one is that the US EU trade deal, as far as I can tell, is dead. The EU was planning to drop its industrial tariffs on US Exports to zero percent later on this week. That's off the table. I think the agreement and the lower 15% tariffs that were reached last year are probably going to revert back to probably going to revert back to the 20% Liberation Day tariffs. So I think that's an acknowledgment that there's no deal on digital services taxation, there's no deal on agriculture issues that have plagued the two sides for 100 years. There are a lot of issues with the US EU trade deal that just are not going to be resolved. And this is the President's way of sort of circumventing that. And then finally, as we all await the Supreme Court, it strikes me as plainly obvious that when and if they do strike down the President's AIPA Tariff Authority and the Republican Party and President Trump specifically are materially underwater on their handling of inflation, prices and the economy. With the American voter base, they don't have the ability to keep ratcheting up tariffs through other alternatives. So Greenland is actually an excellent replacement for tariffs because it keeps those EU and UK and other NATO allies incredibly focused on the US Willing to cater to the president's needs and wants to, and they don't have to necessarily hit back with tariffs, which the domestic audience in the United States cannot stomach anymore. And those are the biggest reasons. I think we're talking about Greenland right now.

[Paul Sweeney]

Henrietta, what's it. How's it playing within the Republican Party these days, or just within Washington? This whole focus on Greenland, it seemed to come out of nowhere, and the president's not letting it go. Are there political ramifications? This is an election year.

[Henrietta Trace]

You know, I've watched polling data, and I've worked on elections from Texas to rhode island for 20 years now. I have never seen the American public so unified in opposition to a single item. I don't think this many Americans like. Like ice cream or Disney World, you know, it's something like 80 to 83% of Americans oppose this Greenland move. That's a striking amount of unanimity and a pretty clear message to the president.

[Nathan Hager]

What does he do with that, though? What does Congress do with that? What does the Republican Party do with that unified opposition to Greenland, to the US Taking control of Greenland?

[Henrietta Trace]

Well, I think it really. Yeah, I think it really speaks to the next phase of President Trump's political status in the United States, which is that we're moving into lame duck territory. I think we're already there. So what that means is you're not going to get out of Congress this year that will advance the president's agenda. That's not abnormal. Very few presidents passed two reconciliation bills. Joe Biden was definitely an outlier in that regard, and he got two bipartisan bills done. I don't think that's an option for this president, you know, in this sort of scorched earth environment. So what presidents do in that scenario is they pivot to foreign policy. And that's what the president has been focused on for many months now, whether it is, you know, Israel, Gaza or Venezuela, and now Greenland. And that's where lame duck presidents traditionally head to at the end of their term. So I know we have three years left of President Trump, but the legislative realities, particularly as we look forward to a midterm election cycle where Democrats are leading in the generic ballot, which is highly predictive of election outcomes by 5 points on average. So the president is migrating into what is a very normal place for presidents to move into in their last couple of years in office, which is foreign.

[Paul Sweeney]

Policy, I seem to have something in the back of my mind. You know, I spent the last week on a beach. How about the government staying open? Where are we in that?

[Henrietta Trace]

Oh, we got some really good news on that front. The House is moving forward with the six remaining bills, even the very contentious homeland security package. And I'm very hopeful that they'll be able to clear the rule later on and get that sort of big package of six appropriations bills over to the Senate by the time they get back next week and we can avert a shutdown. So I think we're on the right path with that one.

[Nathan Hager]

But there's no resolution on health care.

[Mark Champion]

Right.

[Nathan Hager]

Republicans have not come up with a way to make or keep health care plans affordable for Americans who do rely on the Obamacare exchanges.

[Henrietta Trace]

No, there's no solution to the ACA subsidies. And again, I think that goes back to the president having a situation where Congress is not capable of passing legislation. So he pivots to foreign policy in lieu of domestic legislation. So an ACA subsidy extension, you know, my colleague Spencer Perlman has been on the contrary side of this for many months now, but it's still proving accurate. There's just no way to get past the impasse Republicans have on the Hyde amendment and abortion legislation, the income caps, the, the applicability of the ACA subsidies. There's just not a path forward at this time. This the House has acted on a three year extension, but the Senate's not going to pass that bill.

[Paul Sweeney]

Henry had about 30 seconds left. Should we expect any legislation from this Congress in 2026?

[Henrietta Trace]

I don't think so. My odds of a second reconciliation bill are inordinately low. I'm at 20% and that's really trying to be generous. I don't see a path forward for material legislation this year. It's going to be keep the lights on. More bailouts for farmers I think are obviously coming. We'll get $15 billion added in this. That brings us to a total of $30 billion for farmers. We're going to try to keep doing that with the highway bill, with the farm bill and those pieces of sort of must pass legislation.

[Paul Sweeney]

Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this. Support for the show comes from public on public. You can build a multi asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto and now generated assets which allow you to turn any idea into an investable index. With AI it all starts with your prompt. From renewable energy companies with high free cash flow to semiconductor suppliers, growing revenue over 20% year over year. You can literally type any prompt and put the AI to work. It screens thousands of stocks, builds a one of a kind index and lets you back test it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks generated assets are completely customizable and based on your thesis, not someone else's. Go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market paid for by Public.

[Public.com Announcer]

Investing Brokerage Services by Open to the Public Investing Inc. Member FINRA and SIPC Advisory Services by Public Advisors, llc. SEC Registered Advisor Generated Assets is an interactive analysis tool. Output is for informational purposes only and is not an investment recommendation or advice. Complete disclosures available at public.com disclosures these.

[Okta Announcer]

Days it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI Small businesses are the.

[Nathan Hager]

Pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level that makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business. They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn [e-mail] business chase for business Make More of what's Yours the Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices, message and data rates. May apply JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC Copyright 2026 JPMorgan Chase Co.

[Bloomberg Intelligence Host]

You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 10am Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

[Paul Sweeney]

Over the weekend, Greenland became front and center once again. President Trump talking about levying tariffs on some of the European countries that are pushing back on some of the President's moves towards Greenland. Our next guest suggests maybe they should rethink that. Mark Champion He's a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. His latest column is entitled Europe Can't Afford a Throwdown Over Greenland. Mark, thanks so much for joining us here. Why do you write that? How do you think Europe will respond or should respond?

[Mark Champion]

Well, I mean, we can see that they are, I mean, so they're right in principle in everything that they say, you know, that they've had enough. That Trump is using trade, you know, for reasons that it really shouldn't be used, is using it as leverage in order to basically break international law and demand that another country hands over sovereignty over a piece of territory. He has no good reason for doing it. He's given various reasons. They simply don't stand up. The US can do everything that they need to do in Greenland without having to take it. They already have a treaty that allows them to do anything, more or less. So, you know, the European. The outrage is completely understandable. The difficulty is if they get into a trade war, like French President Emmanuel Macron is suggesting, that they, they fire this so called trade bazooka that was designed for exactly this sort of purpose where a foreign country is, you know, misusing trade in order to pressure the eu. If they do that, as Trump has already known, then he will escalate. If they escalate, they need to think of where they get to and whether they will be able to stay together and whether they will be able to resist. And the real problem here, and the point that I was trying to make, is these things are ultimately not determined by principle, but by power. And Europe lacks the power. Trump has that leverage, not necessarily because of trade. If it was just about trade, the EU could, could probably stand its own. The real problem is that they are so dependent in terms of security. They care about NATO. They care desperately about NATO. He does not. You know, they care very much about what happens in Ukraine and that Ukraine should, you know, that the Russian forces could be stopped in Ukraine and not allowed to go further west. He does not. So this is where they have a real problem.

[Nathan Hager]

And you point out that you're already seeing a splintering in that European defense or that that rallying of European nations, Italy notably did not send anyone to Greenland to fight this kind of symbolic, or to put up a symbolic defense against the US's goals for that, that island. How are you thinking of this divide and conquer strategy that the US is employing? Or is it. It's not really much of one. All it has to do is kind of poke holes.

[Mark Champion]

Well, that's it. And if there is, you know, if there is a kind of diabolical logic to what Trump is doing, I suspect that this is it. He's very much on the record is believing that the, or saying that the EU is designed to rip off the United States. He'd like to see it disso. And trade is an area where, one of the few areas where the EU is truly united in terms of its, you know, foreign international presence. So, you know, the power to make trade treaties and trade policy is concentrated in Brussels, not in the capitals. So, you know, he, he would like to break that down. It's much easier to deal with the UK or France or Germany or Denmark individually for the US Than it is to deal with them all collectively. So, you know, it's, you can see a kind of logic to what he might be trying to do. But again, if he is, you cannot maintain an alliance that way. And unfortunately, the risk, real risk for the Europeans is that they are not ready to give up that alliance. They still depend too much on, on the U.S. nuclear umbrella, too much on NATO, you know, U.S. assets within NATO to have a kind of, you know, meaningful deterrent against fully militarized countries such as Russia or China. And it's going to be, you know, they're 10 years away at least from being able to stand on their own in that sense. And that gives Trump a great deal of leverage in the short term.

[Bloomberg Intelligence Host]

This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get. Your podcasts listen live each weekday 10am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live Every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

[Okta Announcer]

These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agents identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

[Nathan Hager]

Well, the holidays have come and gone once again. But if you've forgotten to get that.

[Henrietta Trace]

Special someone in your life a gift.

[Nathan Hager]

Well, Mint Mobile is extending their holiday offer of half off unlimited wireless. So here's the idea. You get it now. You call it an early present for next year.

[Mark Champion]

What do you have to lose?

[Nathan Hager]

Give it a [e-mail] Switch limited time, 50% off regular price for new customers. Upfront payment required. $45 for three months, $90 for six.

[Henrietta Trace]

Months or $180 for 12 month plan taxes and fees.

[Nathan Hager]

Extra speeds may slow after 50 gigabytes per month when network is busy. See Terms Bloomberg Daybreak is your best way to get informed first thing in the morning, right in your podcast feed. Hi, I'm Karen Moscow.

[Paul Sweeney]

And I'm Nathan Hager.

[Public.com Announcer]

Each morning we're up early putting together.

[Paul Sweeney]

The latest episode of Bloomberg Daybreak US Edition.

[Public.com Announcer]

It's your daily 50 minute podcast on.

[Paul Sweeney]

The latest in global news, politics and international relations.

[Nathan Hager]

Listen to the Bloomberg Daybreak udcast each morning for the stories that matter with the context you need.

[Paul Sweeney]

Find us on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen.