Loading summary
Money 20/20 Announcer
You're on your way to the office, right? Maybe out walking the dog, squeezing in a podcast before your next virtual meeting. Where we're going there is no virtual. Only tens of thousands of in person business meetings and hundreds of world class fintech leaders waiting to share their ideas. Where are we going? Money 20 20. The place where money does business. Search Money 2020 for more.
Bloomberg Audio Studios Host
Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts, radio news.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
It's kind of amazing since we hear so much about the President's relationship with the oil industry. While we may not be seeing a lot of additional drilling, there's a, it's kind of a vibes thing that there's just more positive energy in the energy space when it comes to this administration. But stopping down to call them out. What are we looking at for a gallon of gas today, Kaylee? $4 according to AAA and 8 cent. And we wanted to talk this out with Mike Summers. I'm guessing he was listening to this as well. Mike, of course runs the American Petroleum Institute where he's president and CEO, speaking for the industry. It's great to see you, Mike. Great to be here. Welcome back to Bloomberg. Is this an argument within the family? How would you describe the relationship between this administration and your industry and what's he looking for here?
Mike Sommers
Well, first of all, I give the President a lot of credit. His energy dominance agenda has really made the difference. We've opened up the Gulf of America again for production. We have more production on federal lands and of course in federal waters. Their regulatory agenda has been very positive. Oil and gas industry, there's no question this President has been focused on more production here in the United States and that has provided a buffer during this time when the Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed. So I give him a lot of credit for his energy dominance agenda. At the same time, we know that this industry is a price taker, not a price maker. And because the straight in for moves has been shut down for basically five months, we're of course going to be dealing with higher prices at the pump.
Bloomberg Interviewer
So in other words, is higher profit not a choice or could they make a different choice?
Mike Sommers
Well, of course this is an industry. As I said, we are price takers, not price makers. And as a consequence of the Strait of Hormuz, which has been 20 million barrels of oil a day, not making it through the Strait, you're going to have to deal with higher prices. I'll remind you though, in 2020, I was actually in a meeting with the President in the Cabinet where this industry was actually Dealing with low prices, in fact, negative $32 prices. And that was a time when this industry was making virtually zero earnings. So this is a commodity business. Prices go up, prices go down. We have to deal with the price swings. And on average, this industry actually makes fewer earnings than other large industries like tech, like finance. So this is an industry that we do have to deal with those highs and lows. And high prices now mean investments for future production. One example of is during the 20082012 period when we were dealing with significant earnings. At that point too, that was allowed us to finance what eventually became the shale revolution, the fracking revolution, which allowed us today now produce about 14 million barrels of oil every.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
Surely the President understands everything we're talking about here, right? I mean, he knows that there's a refining bottleneck in this country, that there's a disconnect. We talk about crack spreads between the price of crude and what we pay at the pump, that distinct distilled products are their own story. Is he just sounding the populist alarm in an election season? I feel your pain.
Mike Sommers
Well, I do think that everyone is concerned about high prices at the pump for American consumers and high electricity.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
Of guys out by name though, ExxonMobil and Chevron.
Mike Sommers
Absolutely. But we understand that, you know, we're in an election year and we're going to have to deal with that kind of incoming. But at the same time, American consumers have to understand that during this time of high earnings, this is the time when we invest for future production going forward.
Bloomberg Interviewer
Well, as Joe's talking about the political considerations here, that arguably is why we've seen the President float things like a gas tax holiday, for example. Do you fear that he could even go so far if we see prices permanently above $4 a gallon, for example, to suggest that maybe there should be export bans put in place in this country? What would that do?
Mike Sommers
Well, we would also be very concerned about any kind of an export ban. I will say that there are a lot of policies that, that they put in place that have provided some kind of a buffer, for example, the Jones act waiver that they put into place. There are other things they could do. There are changes that they could make to the renewable fuels standard right now that are providing a higher price at the pump that we don't need to sustain right now, given the kind of challenges that we have. But we would be concerned about an export ban primarily because there is a mismatch between the kind of production that we have in the United States this WTI that we produce here in the United States isn't necessarily refined here in the United States. So we import a lot of product from overseas and then we export a lot of product from the United States to be refined elsewhere. That's actually to the benefit of American consumers because we buy that lower quality crude from other countries like Canada, and then sell it to American consumers at a discount. So any kind of an export ban, I think would be a great concern to this industry.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
We've talked about the refining bottlenecks in this country and the need to maintain these refineries. At some point, you need to take them and fix the hardware. In a country that hasn't built a refinery, I believe, since the 1970s, is this the part that needs to be fixed?
Mike Sommers
Well, it's one of the reasons why we're so focused on getting legislative permitting reform done, because it is very hard to build anything in this country, particularly a new oil refinery. You're exactly right. We haven't built a refinery in this country since 1976. And if you think about the market that we were in in 1970, 1976, compared to the one that we are in today, it's a completely different story. We were importing oil at that point. Now we're exporting oil. It doesn't make any sense. We should be building more refineries in this country because that's the real bottleneck right now. Even when you're dealing with lower prices from a crude perspective, you don't have the refining capacity that you need to turn it into the products that we use on a daily basis, like gasoline and diesel.
Bloomberg Interviewer
What are you hearing about permitting reform on Capitol Hill right now? Or I guess maybe a better question is, are you hearing about it? Because we often don't.
Mike Sommers
This should be such a layup for the United States Congress right now. I believe it should be a political imperative for them. You see prices going up, particularly on the electricity side, because of more demand on the electrical grid because of data centers and the advent of artificial intelligence, unfortunately, lawmakers just aren't focused on it because we're dealing. We're in an election year. I think that this should have been the first thing on the agenda this Congress. Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree because all sides benefit, whether it's alternative energies like wind and solar or pipelines that would benefit oil and natural gas. But unfortunately, I think they're a little bit too focused on what's coming in November. And everybody wants to wait until they figure out who's going to win to Decide who's going to benefit from permitting reform.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
There's great hope in the markets today. We see crude oil in the 70s for the first time in some time is encouraging. How long would we need to stay at these levels or move lower to see a significant change in gas prices?
Mike Sommers
Here's the bottom line. Unfortunately, we're still not getting enough product through the Strait of Hormuz. Even at the highest ends. They're saying that we're getting only about 7 million barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz at this point because of new pipeline capacity. You only need to get that level up to about 11 million barrels a day through the strait because of a lot of that product now flowing, flowing through pipelines. That is a great news story for the Middle east and I think over time we need to continue to build that infrastructure so that we can avoid the Strait over time. But right now we need to get that up to about 11 million barrels a day on a sustained basis. If we're going to get back to where we need to be back to where we were prior to this conflict beginning.
Bloomberg Interviewer
Well, so should this administration also tap the rest of the SPR drawdown that they said they would complete? I believe there's 39 million barrels left in that program.
Mike Sommers
So There are about 39 million barrels left in that program. We still have product in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. That was something that they negotiated at the beginning of this that expires at the end of August. They need to think about where they are and start considering whether they're going to do another release or another exchange, which is how this program is developed. I don't know the answer to that yet. I don't think we're going to know until we know the results of of whether this potential deal in the Middle east comes through. We've seen this before, of course. I do think that that is more provided an important relief valve for American consumers. Those targeted SPR releases not just in the United States but throughout the world.
Bloomberg Tech Event Announcer
AI is entering its most consequential phase where scale, safety and sovereignty will determine who leads and who lags. Join Bloomberg Tech in London on November 2nd and 3rd as global leaders across business, finance and policy examine the defining trade offs shaping the future of AI. Thank you to our presenting sponsor Salesforce and supporting sponsors Ida Ireland and Schneider Electric. Learn more@Bloomberg live.com TechLondon
Bloomberg Audio Studios Host
the Bloomberg this weekend podcast News, politics and the lighter side of Bloomberg Forget healthspan. Midlife men face pressure to extend Hotspan Hotspan Hotspan yes. So millennial men. You have to stay hot for, like, several more decades, David. Okay, so you need to work on this.
Bloomberg Energy Reporter
I gotta work on. This is a really not so subtle
Bloomberg Audio Studios Host
way of telling me that the Bloomberg this Weekend podcast. Subscribe today on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen.
Date: August 4, 2026
Host: Bloomberg (Energy Team)
Guest: Mike Sommers, President and CEO, American Petroleum Institute
This episode features a timely conversation with Mike Sommers, President and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, focusing on the ongoing challenges and policies impacting the American oil industry—especially amid the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The discussion touches on the U.S. administration’s energy policies, refinery bottlenecks, the possibility of export bans, the status of domestic infrastructure, and key market dynamics affecting prices at the pump.
On being a “price taker, not maker”:
On the stakes of an export ban:
On American refinery bottlenecks:
On bipartisan permitting reform:
On Strait of Hormuz flows:
On the value of the SPR:
This detailed summary captures the episode’s most engaging arguments, memorable moments, and insightful quotes, providing a clear understanding of the challenges and discussions shaping American and global oil markets in 2026.