Loading summary
Karen Moscow
Bloomberg Daybreak is your best way to get informed first thing in the morning, right in your podcast feed. Hi, I'm Karen Moscow.
Nathan Hager
And I'm Nathan Hager. Each morning we're up early putting together the latest episode of Bloomberg Daybreak US Edition. It's your daily 15 minute podcast on the latest in global news, politics and international relations.
Karen Moscow
Listen to the Bloomberg Daybreak US Edition podcast each morning. For the stories that matter with the.
Nathan Hager
Context you need, find us on Apple, Spotify or anywhere you listen.
Scarlet Fu
Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News here's.
Interviewer
The latest US Data Blind spots weighing on economic Forecasts in the New Year data Peterson of the conference board writing 2025 is ending on a confusing note for markets, economists and central bankers alike. So we should not completely ignore the data. Dana joins us now. Happy New Year. Thank you so much for being with us. Dana, let's start with the data that we have gotten. Why is it so nois? How should people look at it, considering that people do view it as somewhat noisy, but also they can't ignore it.
Dana Petersen
Exactly. You can't ignore these data. We did have data for the third quarter. Certainly the GDP came in a lot stronger than expected and certainly consumption was a lot stronger. Even though we did have data, it shows that the Fed, I mean, the Federal Reserve, sorry, it shows that the federal government probably had more data in between releases and certainly after of the shutdown. But I think the key thing is that inventories and trade were very confusing and indeed, when you add up the inventories, well, when you add up the imports plus the consumption, the inventories numbers just don't make sense. So we really need to get data next week on inventories as well as international trade, business sentiment, and also employment. I think we really need to see more data to get a handle on what happened in the third quarter and also what happened in the fourth quarter.
Interviewer
Dana, we are going to get some data come next week that is going to be important, including the nonfarm payrolls as well as some of the manufacturing aspects that you're talking about. Nonetheless, we have a host of other information out there that people keep pointing to, whether it's adp, whether it's earnings, whether it's the rhetoric coming out of a lot of companies or whether it's retail sales. I mean, is there some sort of conclusion that you can take even amid the noise?
Dana Petersen
Well, I think, you know, certainly the stock market does not reflect the real economy, so we can't look to that. And also people who most people don't own stocks so they're not really benefiting from that. We do have lots of sentiment data. Of course, our consumer sentiment data has shown that consumers are less sanguine about the current conditions as well as having some concerns about the future. You know, retail sales, all we have really is the end of the third quarter and they were weaker. So I think that we just need more information. And you can't look at these things and try to estimate what the government data is going to tell us.
Interviewer 2
I'm looking at the conference Board consumer confidence index and it hasn't been this low since the pandemic. So what does that tell us about, you know, inflation, growth, spending?
Dana Petersen
Well, I think the inflation bit has yet to hit us. Remember, the tariffs that were implemented were delayed twice and also they were raised and lowered several times. So many businesses are still waiting to see if there's any certainty with respect to tariffs. Yes, we've had a number of deals established, but there's still a lot that's unknown. And so with businesses uncertain, it doesn't mean that. It just means that we're not going to see much hiring. We're not seeing layoffs, which is good. Most people still are working, but those who do get laid off are finding it very difficult to find jobs. And even though most consumers are working and they actually are spending, the type of spending that they're engaged with is very different. They're buying things that they need. And when it comes to, especially with goods and services, and when it does, it does come to things that are entertaining, they're buying cheap things, right? Cheap thrills like streaming instead of going to the movies and paying, you know, over $100 for a family of four. And so I think we need to really get beyond the first quarter of this year to really see what's happening because I think that's when we're going to see the bigger effects of tariffs on inflation and consumers really pull back.
Interviewer 2
Dana, I've been trying to pin down how workers wages have kept up with inflation. As I've been saying, you know, Torsten Slok put out a six year average showing that wages are doing pretty better than inflation. But Mark Chandler, whom we just spoke with from Banenbrook, says in his household that certainly isn't the case. And he doesn't, he doesn't think that, that it looks like a great picture for, for consumers. How do you see it?
Dana Petersen
Well, yes, wage growth and compensation have been slowing from the peaks that we saw during the, the pandemic. Certainly the later portion of the pandemic when we were trying to get everybody back into the labor market, you need to entice them and with compensation. But still, I mean, I would say that wages are still growing at a pace that's above where we were between the great financial crisis and the pandemic. And but I would look at the last GDP data where we saw real disposable income grow at 0.0 percentage points annualized in the third quarter. That's not a good sign. And so we definitely do see slowing in wages. And for some people it may be faster than others.
Interviewer
Dana Petersen of the Conference Board, thank you so much for being with us this morning on the first trading day of the new year.
Scarlet Fu
This is Scarlet Fu and I'm Paul.
Paul Sweeney
Sweeney inviting you to join us for the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast.
Scarlet Fu
Every day we harness the power of Bloomberg Intelligence to bring you deep dives into the companies that are moving markets from publicly traded companies like Apple to those that are privately owned but known by everyone on Earth like OpenAI.
Paul Sweeney
Now I help to build Bloomberg Intelligence to what it is today. Scarlett and now our analysts are the best in the world, covering more than 2,000 global companies.
Scarlet Fu
That is your legacy, Paul and we speak to those in house experts every day. They are Bloomberg's go to authorities on sectors, companies and legal processes.
Paul Sweeney
We do it all live each weekday, then bring you the best conversations in our daily podcast.
Scarlet Fu
So be sure to search for Bloomberg Intelligence on YouTube, Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen.
Paul Sweeney
Listen in the afternoons on your way home from work to catch up on the market news you missed during the.
Scarlet Fu
Business day that is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. I'm Scarlet.
Paul Sweeney
Scarlet Fu and I'm Paul Sweeney. Subscribe today wherever you get your podcasts.
Date: January 2, 2026
Host: Bloomberg
Guest: Dana Peterson, Chief Economist, The Conference Board
This episode focuses on the confusing economic data as 2025 ends and the challenges of interpreting mixed signals in markets, employment, inflation, and consumer sentiment as the U.S. heads into 2026. Dana Peterson of The Conference Board shares her perspective on what the latest data really signal for the economy, explaining why economists and policymakers remain cautious, and what consumers and workers should expect in the early months of the new year.
[00:40–02:05]
[02:05–03:12]
[03:12–04:47]
[04:47–06:02]
On Economic Data Confusion:
"When you add up the imports plus the consumption, the inventories numbers just don't make sense."
— Dana Peterson [01:33]
On Markets vs. Main Street:
"The stock market does not reflect the real economy, so we can't look to that. And also people who—most people don't own stocks, so they’re not really benefiting from that."
— Dana Peterson [02:34]
On Future Data Clarity:
“We need to really get beyond the first quarter of this year to really see what's happening because I think that's when we're going to see the bigger effects of tariffs on inflation and consumers really pull back.”
— Dana Peterson [04:33]
On Wage Growth Stagnating:
“I would look at the last GDP data where we saw real disposable income grow at 0.0 percentage points annualized in the third quarter. That's not a good sign.”
— Dana Peterson [05:39]
Conclusion:
Dana Peterson's insights suggest that despite some headline figures and resilient employment, the economy’s real underlying trends in late 2025 are cloudy and uncertain. Businesses and consumers remain cautious, and more reliable data is needed in early 2026 to understand where inflation, wages, and spending are truly headed.
Listeners are left with a sense of wariness but also pragmatic advice: be patient for more robust data and don’t base decisions solely on noisy, incomplete indicators.