Loading summary
IBM Executive
The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across hr, IT and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM,
Gina Raimondo
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Host 1
Let's turn to this. The build out growing as a political flashpoint. New York State leading the pushback, becoming the first in the nation to issue a moratorium on new HyperScaler data centers. PJM, the largest grid operator in the country, saying datacenters have increased supply costs by more than 60%. The former U.S. commerce Secretary, General Raimondo, is leading Raise Us, a nonpartisan organization designed to help the American labor force adapt to AI. The secretary joins us now for more. Madam Secretary, welcome to the program. Let's just start the conversation with the kind of work you're doing and what we need to know this morning.
Gina Raimondo
Good morning. Good morning. So Raise Us is the new organization that I am leading. And our mission is very simple. You know, we want the US to lead the global AI competition, but to have a strategy so that every American worker gets brought along. And right now we're not headed down that path. And it's something I'm deeply worried about. We have extremely outdated infrastructure, social insurance, support for workers, incentives for companies to retrain and redeploy instead of just laying people off. And so I think it's time that we get to work. We're working with governors of both parties. This is a nonpartisan, nonpolitical effort with companies and just trying to find some creative, innovative solutions. Because I will tell you, one of my greatest worries is even if America has the best chips, the best models, the most data centers, but doesn't have an intentional plan to manage this transition and falls into a period of very high unemployment, we will lose the race because that will be too destabilizing.
Host 2
What's your reaction, though, to what New York Governor Kathy Hochul is doing in terms of the moratorium? Because this potentially can slow down how quickly the US can advance in the AI space. Right.
Gina Raimondo
So I think this is a perfect example of what we're trying to do, which is to say Americans are worried, right? They're worried about when, when the average American hears AI. What they hear is, I'm going to lose my job, my electricity prices are going up, my Kids won't have a job. I just spent money for college. Those are real, legitimate, valid anxieties and we have to find solutions to address them. So while I don't think, like no one is happier than the president of China that we are slowing down data center construction, that being said, it's not okay if people's electricity bills are going up or people's water bills are going up, or people's economic security is going down because of, you know, AI companies. So we must find a way to do both. Steam ahead with data centers and technology and make sure, you know, these companies pay their fair share so other folks, electricity bills don't go up and people have frankly, a job, a meaningful job in an economy.
Host 2
You recently wrote an opinion piece where you said, what we need is a new grand bargain between the public and private sectors when it comes to AI. What do you make of the Trump administration looking at taking equity stakes, another version of industrial policy that some of which started under the Biden administration?
Gina Raimondo
Yes. So listen, I do think it is a good idea for the American people and the American government to share in the extreme profit and commercial benefit of AI. That being said, I personally have always been a bit of a critic on the government taking big equity shares of companies. You know, I'm, I'm still a believer in capitalism, however many flaws it has right now in the way it's playing out in America. And I just, you know, the government owning the means of production is, you know, the definition of socialism. I think it's creates a lot of problem, potential for corruption. So I think the intention is a good intention. Personally, I just get very nervous if we're stepping down a path of like a state owned enterprise, etc. So I, I'd like to find another way.
Host 3
How do you balance the idea of trying to create some sort of pact with the U.S. worker, with the U.S. average citizen, while also maintaining a U.S. edge versus China. Right. I mean, do you want to sort of create this sense that there is isolation between the two stacks? I just wonder what the ultimate goal is, what the approach you're hearing from some of the folks you're speaking with.
Gina Raimondo
You know, I think if you talk to the tech companies in AI, many of whom are partners with us and raise us, they feel that they're in a global arms race to, you know, get ahead of each other and also get ahead of China and other technologies. And I, I understand that, but I will say this. If we as a nation put our blinders on and, and if every company just moves forward at pace to implement AI to increase profits without a people strategy. And if we wake up in a couple of years with millions or tens of millions Americans put out of work because of AI, we will lose the global air race because there will be massive regulatory backlash. It will be massively destabilizing to our economy. It'll be recessionary. It'll be massively destabilizing for our politics. So what I'm trying to say to business leaders, to governors, to Congress, to everyone in America, is let's get together and find solutions. Let us be intentional about how we transition to an economy, because quite frankly, every American deserves to see themselves productive and having a good job in that economy. And until we convince the people of America that there's a good future for them in an AI economy, you're going to continue to see what you what you just asked me about moratoriums on data centers, other kinds of uprising. And that's bad for America. That's bad for everyone in America.
Host 1
No doubt that debate is going to continue. We look forward to covering it with you, the former U.S. commerce commerce secretary Gina Raimondo there. Madam Secretary, thank you.
Karen Moscow
Get the news you need in just 15 minutes.
Nathan Hager
Start your day with Bloomberg Daybreak, the podcast with a global view on the stories that matter. I'm Nathan Hager.
Karen Moscow
And I'm Karen Moscow. Join us each morning for curated stories on current events, politics, business and foreign
Nathan Hager
relations, plus one conversation on the day's biggest events elements, all in just 15 minutes.
Karen Moscow
Subscribe to Bloomberg Daybreak for a precise, thoughtful take on the stories that matter.
Nathan Hager
Listen to Bloomberg Daybreak each morning on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen to.
Episode: Former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo Talks AI Race
Date: July 15, 2026
Host: Bloomberg
Guest: Gina Raimondo, Former U.S. Commerce Secretary and head of "Raise Us"
This episode centers on the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) advancement in the U.S., sociopolitical concerns about its impact, and the delicate balancing act between pushing technological leadership and safeguarding American workers. Gina Raimondo, now leading the nonpartisan group "Raise Us," provides insight into how the U.S. should manage AI's economic disruption, workforce challenges, and competition with China, while also weighing in on current policy debates, like New York’s data center moratorium.
[01:11]
Gina Raimondo introduces "Raise Us" as a response to America’s need for an AI strategy inclusive of all workers.
"We want the US to lead the global AI competition, but to have a strategy so that every American worker gets brought along. And right now we're not headed down that path. And it's something I'm deeply worried about." (Gina Raimondo, 01:14)
[02:22] - [03:46]
Hosts reference New York’s moratorium on new hyperscale data centers, rooted in concerns about power grid strain and cost increases.
Raimondo acknowledges legitimate public anxieties:
"I don't think, like no one is happier than the president of China that we are slowing down data center construction, that being said, it's not okay if people's electricity bills are going up or people's water bills are going up, or people's economic security is going down because of, you know, AI companies." (Gina Raimondo, 02:57)
[03:46] - [05:05]
Hosts raise Raimondo’s call for a new compact on AI and ask about the Trump administration’s idea of taking equity stakes in major AI companies.
Raimondo responds:
"I just, you know, the government owning the means of production is, you know, the definition of socialism. I think it creates a lot of problem, potential for corruption. So I think the intention is a good intention. Personally, I just get very nervous if we're stepping down a path of like a state owned enterprise..." (Gina Raimondo, 04:36)
[05:05] - [07:10]
Discussion turns to how the U.S. can remain competitive against China while avoiding mass workforce disruption.
Raimondo argues for a national, intentional transition plan:
"If we as a nation put our blinders on...and if we wake up in a couple of years with millions or tens of millions of Americans put out of work because of AI, we will lose the global air race because there will be massive regulatory backlash. It will be massively destabilizing to our economy. It'll be recessionary. It'll be massively destabilizing for our politics." (Gina Raimondo, 05:59)
"Let us be intentional about how we transition to an economy, because quite frankly, every American deserves to see themselves productive and having a good job in that economy." (Gina Raimondo, 06:35)
"No one is happier than the president of China that we are slowing down data center construction..." (Gina Raimondo, 02:57)
This episode lays bare the high stakes facing the U.S. as it seeks to maintain global AI leadership without igniting domestic instability. Gina Raimondo pushes for a middle path: rapid tech adoption built around smart, inclusive, and proactive labor policy, underlining that the AI race is not only a technological endeavor—but fundamentally about the fate and well-being of American workers.