Loading summary
Nathan Hager
When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, that isn't always easy. Risk can touch multiple parts of an organization at the same time, often in ways that aren't immediately obvious. It might involve property liability or cyber. It could stem from regulatory requirements or challenges tied to a specific industry or the scale of an operation. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline, not a one time decision. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. That means working with companies to identify where they're exposed, decide what matters most and put practical standards in place so risk is managed as part of day to day operations. And when losses do happen, the Hartford can pair that risk control work with insurance coverage grounded in underwriting, risk engineering and claims experience developed over time. Learn more@theheartford.com risk mitigation
Brian Belsky
Bloomberg audio Studios Podcasts Radio News this really important conversation
Karen Moscow
because it has been front and center in every conversation we had. One of the charms of Brian Belsky at Humilias with the success of going out on his own. This whole shop that he's done across Canada and across America is there's like Paul, it's, there's, it's not verboseness, it's not like, you know, what do you know, pages and you know, a million words and all that. Our pick is Microsoft. Brian Belsky discuss.
Brian Belsky
Good morning. You know, the three Bs of public speaking and writing are be brief, be bright.
Karen Moscow
Axios Johnson did that.
Brian Belsky
Okay, Microsoft, Microsoft, we think has this war, we know, has this war chest of cash. Microsoft has proven through the years that they can monetize these new things that they, that they take on. I think Microsoft in particular of all of the, you know, to call it a hyperscaler or software company's been unjustly beat up and as you've seen, the spending is not going to go away. But in terms of how on AI, by the way, but how they've been able to continue through a longer term perspective, manage these properties. That's why we own Microsoft and we're going to continue. Microsoft was down in the second quarter, hurt our portfolios. We still had great performance in the second quarter but at the end of the day we're longer term investors and we believe in hub the management there and we believe what they're doing.
Nathan Hager
It just comes down to what I find challenging. I think as you think about the software stocks and software as a service stocks is yes, I can see a case where I could disrupt a lot of their business but I don't even know what AI is going to do. No, I can't figure that out. And so much less than then to say Microsoft's going to be hurt or ServiceNow is going to be hurt or soft, you know. But I guess the market's just saying we're just, we're selling now and we'll figure it out later.
Brian Belsky
Yeah, I just like the meta news is confounding to me. I know everyone was excited about stock was up double digits but now they're spending on cloud and now they're pivoting this way and now they're trying to chase this building it versus spending on it. I just, I just think that Microsoft's been much more consistent in its operations and I want to stick with the consistent deliverers.
Karen Moscow
Jim Chanos with Bloomberg Money here two weeks ago nailed the meta thing. He calls it the Neo cloud. We can't figure out what to do with AI so we're going to compete with Amazon on the cloud. Nadella in major shout out Bradley Olson and Tina Lee at the Wall Street Journal with this definitive Nadella interview. I read his bio. Nadella is not normal. I think a huge body of the investment public doesn't understand his internal drive.
Brian Belsky
I don't think so. And remember too when he took over that company was, you know, after, after Steve and no one like Steve. I remember I was both at Piper and Merrill during those days and we had huge presence in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest in particular owned a lot of Microsoft stock and they did not like him. The private wealth perspective of that really started to when he came in and brought more process and discipline and how they were monetizing these new properties and moving away from the subscription service into more of the deliverable software and all that kind of stuff, that's where it really took off. So I'm a believer we're there. I think of a stock that now it's becoming more of a value stock. You take a look at the balance sheet and the price to free cash flow on that company, it looks pristine. So we really like it. It's much more contrarian, Paul, I would say than trying to pick the bottom and be a hero in Salesforce or Adobe. We just don't think that they're in the same league and that's why we're sticking with it.
Nathan Hager
We had a small mid cap portfolio manager come in this week and finally with a smile on her face because of her performance in the Russell 2000 is 2x out of the S&P 500 this year, which is, you know, doesn't happen very often. How do you think about small mid cap stocks?
Brian Belsky
No, we've been believers for a while and we've been wrong aside from the second quarter. And the way that we look at it is we look at the small mid cap indices within the S&P 1500 and if you take a look at the mid cap and the small cap, the SML dramatically outperformed the mid cap at like 500 or 600 basis points. And the reason why the Russell 2000 outperformed the S&P 600 is because you have a lot more companies in the Russell 2000 that don't own money. So there was Go Go Jojo, the juicier companies. But if you take a look at the S&P 600 small cap SML, price to cash flow, balance sheet, earnings discernibility, better than large cap, better than large cap. And the growth rates for the second half of the year are better too. So I think in this world of the need for liquidity and people love private equity, they love private markets. All these private equity, private market companies are smaller companies. So I think they're going to seek liquidity in small cap.
Karen Moscow
Brian Belsky with us here before jobs day. 20 minutes away. Lisa Mateo to follow on here in a bit, but thrilled to have the gentleman from Humiliat with us. I look at July 2ish and it tells me and people know where I am on rebalancing Sell your winners. I'm like really rebalancing this time around.
Brian Belsky
Violent. Because think about what Micron did to a lot of the indices. Now, full disclosure, we don't own Micron.
Karen Moscow
Do you rebalance?
Brian Belsky
Yes, you do. Because we did a lot in June, June 1st because of what happened in May. And so we had a couple positions that doubled in May and then we rebalanced back. We don't on Micro. We don't on Micron. But it messed up. It messed up some of the indices. For instance, if you take a look at the Russell 1000 value technology sector, okay, it was up over 100%. And come on, man. And Micron is a value stock. I just don't, I didn't get that. But me, we underperformed the value index by 200 basis points. We were still up double digits. I mean, it's crazy. So yeah, you have to rebalance. We use drift in our portfolios as you should because you never try to outsmart the market. But you use drift. Drift is you just let the positions kind of go over time. So say if you. My position, my core position, XYZ is 4% and it goes to 4.75%. I'm not going to rebalance back to 4.
Karen Moscow
So when you rebalance, you don't sell the whole position.
Brian Belsky
No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Because I think the biggest problem with institutional portfolio managers, and some of them took over our prior job that own 200 stocks, guys, right? They have 200 stocks in these big fancy portfolios. When you run separately, manage account portfolios, you're catering to Paul Sweeney high net worth. And he's got taxable gains in all these companies in these 50 stocks. If you blow out XYZ stock by owning it for 10 years, he's not going to be happy with you because you have a taxable gain. Or if you're an institutional person, you blow out positions, you don't have that same thing. So on an SMA like we run 40 to 50 stocks, period, we have low turnover and you save a position goes up to 6%, cut a half, you still own the position.
Karen Moscow
What you just heard there, folks, bronze it. We will have Belsky and Bloomberg Money. Because what you just heard was the clearest discussion of the madness of selling all of a winner with the memory of Benjamin Edwards the third right there. Bronze it on selling the top positions. Let's go. When they, you know, when they talk about high net worth, they never look at me.
Nathan Hager
They look at you.
Karen Moscow
I don't know what that's about.
Brian Belsky
Paul Sweeney with Brian Belsky.
Nathan Hager
What is your positioning in AI? How, how are you trying to play it right now? Is it still just own the chips or the picks and shovels? As people talk about. How do you think about it?
Brian Belsky
You know, we've owned, and we've had the very honor of owning Nvidia in various portfolios and various jobs since 2018 or so. So we're sticking with that. We love the amd, we love the Broadcom, Qualcomm for more value, but that's it. The key thing to investing is, I think is that you don't have to own everything. You don't have to own everything, have conviction and stick with it. But you know what I think people are missing is we're building out these data centers. So how do you build a data center, man? Well, people talk about Caterpillar. Well, we like this company called Acuity. We own it in our small mid cap and they make the tiles that go on top of the buildings between the ceiling and the ceiling and the top of where the tiles are. Because in between that are the wires. The wires heat up. So acuity makes these tiles that are cool enough to keep the heat. I mean it's really. But people aren't thinking like that. Right. And so stuff like that or old school power companies like Nextera because you got to plug in, you got to plug in the power or Southern Co. And so that's I think the next derivative down. I think the biggest theme though that some play is cybersecurity because I just don't think people understand it enough. And that's why we own Palo Alto. By far, I think from our viewers, the best company in there. They've integrated in a couple of new acquisitions. One of them Cyberark the last year or so that kind of took some time to get going, but they certainly got paid for owning Cyberark the last month or so.
Nathan Hager
Yes. Boy, Palo Alto has been a great stock, almost doubling in the last year to date here. What are we doing with financials here? Seems like I'm seeing deals left and right. Capital markets, business is great. What are we doing with financials?
Brian Belsky
Love, love, love. In our theme of owning the big ones and owning the really small ones, I think really works. Why the really small ones, Brian? Because the really small ones are the essence of the way that some of us in this room kind of grew up in the business relationships. They're getting the business from the commercial bank and the private bank that let's say the big, the big guys are not right in the regional communities. That's why we like the Glacier Bancorp's and the FNBs and the Pinnacles and things like that. But then you go to the big dogs where JP Morgan obviously multi divisional assets, they were part of the deal with SpaceX. We're going to see more investment banking in the next six months. They benefit from private wealth. Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, they've done very well. And I think.
Nathan Hager
Let's go back to Glacier Bancorp. It's in Montana, dude, there's nobody there.
Karen Moscow
Well, that's why it's colder than here.
Brian Belsky
It's colder. It's 83 fun 11 sunshine and degrees in New York. But I think it's probably like what, 65 there. I'll take that. Yeah, but I think the in between, I think what we didn't talk about is the in between regional banks. We're going to see some consolidation.
Karen Moscow
I got to get this in quick here. The person after you're so important. You know, we got to just get this in. So the vikings unload their GM. They steal for the Packers. September 30th. It will be cooler. The Vikings, like they've really made some significant.
Brian Belsky
They blew apart. They blew apart their front office. Yeah, they blew up the front office. They don't know who the quarterback's going to be. You know, you're welcome, Knicks fans, for the Timberwolves giving a cat. Now, what's going to happen with Minnesota sports? You know, me being a long term Minnesota sports fan. JJ Hardy or jj. JJ Hardy. JJ Is going to be let go and he's going to become like a Hall of Fame quarterback for somebody else. That's just the way that it works in Minnesota, man. I'm telling you. Garnett leaves, he wins a. He wins a. He wins the title with the Celtics. Ortiz leaves, goes to Boston, becomes a Hall of Fame baseball player.
Karen Moscow
I teared up that day. That was like, are you kidding? We have David Ortiz. Really? Yeah. So you're not thrilled with the Vikings this year?
Brian Belsky
I have to play defense and I'd rather be. I'd rather under promise and over deliver.
Karen Moscow
Okay. That's called being a Red Sox fan.
Brian Belsky
Go away.
Karen Moscow
Brian Belsky, thank you so much. What you heard there on rebalancing was just absolutely fabulous. And we'll do more with Mr. Belsky.
Nathan Hager
Get the news you need in just 15 minutes.
Brian Belsky
Start your day with Bloomberg Daybreak, the
Karen Moscow
podcast with a global view on the stories that matter.
Brian Belsky
I'm Nathan Hager. And I'm Karen Moscow.
Nathan Hager
Join us each morning for curated stories on current events, politics, business and foreign
Brian Belsky
relations, plus one conversation on the day's
Karen Moscow
biggest developments, all in just 15 minutes.
Nathan Hager
Subscribe to Bloomberg Daybreak for a precise, thoughtful take on the stories that matter. Listen to Bloomberg Daybreak each morning on Apple Sports, Spotify, or anywhere you listen.
Date: July 2, 2026
Host: Bloomberg (Karen Moscow & Nathan Hager)
Guest: Brian Belsky, Humilis
This episode features Brian Belsky of Humilis offering his candid insights into the stock market as of mid-2026. The conversation covers investment strategies in large versus small/mid-cap stocks, how to think about artificial intelligence (AI) investments, financial sector opportunities, portfolio rebalancing, and even a few lighter sports remarks. Belsky’s perspective is shaped by long-term conviction and emphasizes discipline, selectivity, and the pitfalls of trying to chase every trend.
"Microsoft, we think has this war chest of cash... Microsoft has proven through the years that they can monetize these new things that they take on." — Brian Belsky [01:41]
"We just don't think that they're in the same league and that's why we're sticking with it." [04:35]
"The key thing to investing is, I think, is that you don't have to own everything. You don't have to own everything. Have conviction and stick with it." — Brian Belsky [09:18]
"If you take a look at the S&P 600 small cap SML, price to cash flow, balance sheet, earnings discernibility, better than large cap, better than large cap." — Brian Belsky [05:31]
"You never try to outsmart the market. But you use drift. Drift is you just let the positions kind of go over time." — Brian Belsky [06:57]
"What you just heard was the clearest discussion of the madness of selling all of a winner... Bronze it on selling the top positions." — Karen Moscow [08:12]
"In our theme of owning the big ones and owning the really small ones, I think really works." — Brian Belsky [10:38]
On AI Uncertainty:
"I don't even know what AI is going to do... the market's just saying we're selling now and we'll figure it out later." — Nathan Hager [02:28]
On Satya Nadella’s Leadership:
"Nadella is not normal. I think a huge body of the investment public doesn’t understand his internal drive." — Karen Moscow [03:35]
"When he came in and brought more process and discipline... that’s where it really took off. So I’m a believer." — Brian Belsky [03:44]
On Market Madness:
"Come on, man. And Micron is a value stock. I just don't, I didn't get that. But me, we underperformed the value index by 200 basis points. We were still up double digits." — Brian Belsky [06:56]
Humorous Asides:
Brian Belsky’s approach stresses the importance of long-term thinking, disciplined rebalancing, and selective conviction over trend-chasing. He is constructive on Microsoft and AI infrastructure, patient with small-cap quality, strategic in the financial sector, and sensitive to both risk and tax considerations. His insights are especially valuable for portfolio managers and sophisticated investors looking to navigate a volatile, AI-infused financial landscape.