Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll Talks Military Test Ranges

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: Bloomberg Talks with Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll on Military Test Ranges

Date: August 7, 2026
Host: Bloomberg (Interviewer/Host)
Guest: US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll (US Army Official/Spokesperson)
Theme: Accelerating Military Innovation: Modernizing Access, Partnerships, and Technologies at US Army Test Ranges

---

Episode Overview

This episode features an insightful conversation with Secretary Daniel Driscoll of the US Army, exploring new initiatives to make military test ranges more accessible to industry partners, both domestic and international. The discussion covers how the army is working to accelerate technology development and procurement, the impact of current global conflicts (notably Ukraine), budgetary constraints, and the army’s evolving approach to layered defense with drones and interceptors.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Accelerating Access to US Army Test Ranges

• Problem Identified:

  • Historically, companies waited 12–18 months for access to army test ranges, bottlenecking innovation.
  • Quote:
    • “If you think of these innovative companies... everyone needs to be able to test their product... and when we slow things down in the innovation loop by 12 or 18 months... that is just bad for soldiers, it's bad for taxpayers, and it's bad for companies.”
      — Driscoll, 00:38

• New Solution Announced:

  • Launching a “new front door” for faster, “concierge access” to many army ranges.
  • Target: Get companies onto ranges within 30 days.
  • Expansion to include international partners.
  • Quote:
    • “[We] aspire to get these companies onto our range within 30 days every single time.”
      — Driscoll, 01:26

---

2. Speeding Up Funding and Procurement

• Rapid Contracting:

  • Creation of a $750 million venture-style model, reallocating existing funds for faster contracts.
  • Some industry partners now receive contracts in under 30 days (historically 9 months to 2 years).
  • Emphasis on backing industry investment with speedy army dollars.
  • Quote:
    • “We have created almost a $750 million venture-like model... allowed us to get industry on contract, sometimes in under 30 days... If you looked historically, the fastest time... was like nine months.”
      — Driscoll, 01:48

• Mutual Commitment:

  • Army expects partners to build, innovate, and spend time with soldiers.
  • Army must reciprocate with real funding support.

---

3. Learning from Ongoing Conflicts (Ukraine Example)

• Innovation Under Pressure:
  • Ukraine’s existential threat triggers rapid military innovation.
  • US Army aims to create “synthetic” conditions within exercises (e.g., electronic warfare at Camp Grayling) to approximate such environments and stimulate innovation.
  • Invitation to small and large US companies to participate.
  • Quote:
    • “What we're trying to do is synthetically create the conditions for innovation that can get as close to matching that environment as possible.”
      — Driscoll, 02:38

---

4. Budgetary Constraints and Navigating Uncertainty

• Annual/Disrupted Funding Cycles:

  • Reliance on annual budgets and frequent continuing resolutions restricts new project starts and long-term planning.
  • Army’s approach: Maximize flexibility with what’s available and strive for budget consolidation.
  • Rebuilding congressional trust for greater future flexibility.
  • Quote:
    • “The quirk of the design of our democratic form of government is our funding is annual... It is full stop bad for soldiers, that is bad for our national security, and we must, as a nation, fix it.”
      — Driscoll, 03:41

• Supplemental Funding Needs:

  • $67 billion supplemental funding is critical to army readiness and innovation timelines.
  • Quote:
    • “We need the supplemental, we need the reconciliation, and we need the budget to be passed on time. That will lead to the most secure country that the United States army can possibly give it.”
      — Driscoll, 04:38

---

5. Evolving Defense: Data Layers, Sensors, and Layered Effectors

• Operation Jailbreak:

  • Breaking data silos, mandating all army sensors and equipment are interoperable via APIs/SDKs.
  • Every new system is open source in data sharing.
  • Robust “data layers” increase warning and defensive capabilities.

• Layered Effectors:

  • Emphasizing a wide inventory: $1 machine-gun rounds up to $4.4M advanced interceptors.

  • Variability and multiple options are vital—no “one perfect answer.”

  • All options tied into a system with a human in the loop for final decisions.

  • Quote:

    • “The key to defense in this layered concept is you want as many options as humanly possible... all tied into an agentix solution with a human in the loop...”
      — Driscoll, 05:03

  • Memorable Line:

    • “Operation Jailbreak... we are no longer going to allow any sensor, any radar... to have data that is siloed.”
      — Driscoll, 05:03

---

6. Impact on Timelines for Building Capabilities

• Timeline Compression:
  • Moving from 12–18 month range access to 30 days will cut at least a third off R&D times.
  • Significant positive impact for army readiness and speed of innovation.
  • Quote:
    • “If you can get to the range every 30 days, what we hope to do is cut out at least a third of the R and D time, which will make a huge difference for soldiers.”
      — Driscoll, 06:51

---

Timestamps for Major Segments

• [00:38] – Test range access bottlenecks and new concierge system
• [01:48] – Innovative funding and rapid contracting
• [02:38] – Lessons from Ukraine and synthesizing innovation pressure
• [03:41] – Budget cycles, constraints, and supplemental funding
• [05:03] – Data sharing, Operation Jailbreak, and the layered defense approach
• [06:51] – Timelines for R&D and impact of new initiatives

---

Notable Quotes

• “That's just bad for soldiers, it's bad for taxpayers, and it's bad for companies.” – Driscoll, [00:44]
• “If you can get to the range every 30 days... cut out at least a third of the R and D time, which will make a huge difference for soldiers.” – Driscoll, [06:51]
• “We have tried to just accept that [funding uncertainty] has been the reality… Innovate as fast as humanly possible with what we do have.” – Driscoll, [03:41]
• “Operation Jailbreak... we are no longer going to allow any sensor, any radar... to have data that is siloed.” – Driscoll, [05:03]
• “Variability is the key to success for conflict going forward.” – Driscoll, [05:57]

---

Episode Tone

The conversation is candid and urgent, balancing frustration at bureaucratic constraints with an optimistic tone about the innovative changes underway. Secretary Driscoll emphasizes service to soldiers and national security, demonstrating commitment to faster, more effective procurement and technological evolution.

---

For those unable to listen:
This episode provides a vivid look into the U.S. Army’s efforts to break down barriers for innovation, support industry partners, and evolve its technological edge—while candidly addressing the persistent challenge of congressional budgeting and the lessons learned from Ukraine. It’s essential listening for anyone interested in military innovation, public-private partnership, and defense readiness.

---

Transcript

[Amazon Health AI Narrator]

Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts I

[Patient/Customer]

I can't stop scratching my downtown. Mm, yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type than say out loud.

[Amazon Health AI Narrator]

There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24. 7 Health care just got less painful.

[Podcast Announcer]

Bloomberg Audio Studios Podcasts Radio News this

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

is a really big deal. It was a couple of months ago. I was out at one of our test ranges and what I heard was that industry on average was having to wait between 12 and 18 months, sometimes from the moment they wanted to get on our test range, until we could give them access. And fundamentally the problem with this is if you think of these innovative companies, if you think of the primes, everyone needs to be able to test their product and they need to be able to learn from that. And the innovation loop that comes from actually using your thing in the real world is makes all the difference. And so when we slow things down in the innovation loop by 12 or 18 months at a time, that is just bad for soldiers, it's bad for taxpayers, and it's bad for companies. And so what we're announcing today is big, basically a new front door to access all of the US Army's or many of the US Army's ranges. We're layering in international partners, we're going to give concierge access, and we are going to aspire to get these companies onto our range within 30 days every single time.

[Interviewer/Host]

So then after they're on that range, I think a lot of these companies are probably wondering how quickly can they get into business with the U.S. army? If you like what you see, how do those purchases work from there? What sort of timeline are you eyeing for that? So.

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

So under President Trump, what we've been able to do is we've been able to reallocate dollars we already had. And so we created almost a $750 million venture like Model that has allowed us to get industry on contract, sometimes in under 30 days. That is unbelievable. I mean, I think if you looked historically, the fastest time I had heard anyone ever reference was like nine months. But on average it could be up to two years sometimes. And so our commitment to industry is we know that they need dollars from the U.S. army in order to continue their innovation. We know that if we're asking them to come out and spend time with soldiers, get their products in the dirt and the mud and to innovate, we have Got to be there for them on the other side with actual hard dollars.

[Interviewer/Host]

How are current conflicts highlighting the need for initiatives like this and for the US army to scale? Is there a new urgency here?

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

I think if you look at what's occurring in Ukraine, they have this existential risk to their nation that allows them to innovate very quickly. You would never want to have that risk as a nation. So what we're trying to do is synthetically create the conditions for innovation that can get as close to matching that environment as possible. And so one of the things we're doing here at Camp Grayling in September is we're creating an electronic warfare in a environment that is as close to what Ukraine has as we can create. We're inviting in small, medium and large businesses from across our country. We're having soldiers come down and we trying to empower these incredible American innovators to do what they do best, which is to out innovate the rest of the world.

[Interviewer/Host]

So the army lives off of annual budgets. Right. How do you ensure that you're able to scale and grow initiatives like this in what is, I think it's fair to say, a pretty unpredictable funding cycle? And how much weight maybe does that put on the $67 billion fund supplemental package in terms of what the army needs to get done?

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

So the quirk of the design of our democratic form of government is our funding is annual. It is oftentimes continuing resolutions, which means we can't do new starts on our spending. And that is full stop bad for soldiers, that is bad for our national security, and we must, as a nation, fix it. That being said, what we have tried to do is just accept that that has been the reality. I think 18 of the last 21 years, we've had continuing resolutions. And so what the United States army has been trying to, Under Secretary Hex leadership is innovate as fast as humanly possible with what we do have. And we feel very good that working with Congress and Senate and consolidating down some of our budget line items, we are getting more flexibility than we have had in the last couple of years. Not as much as we had a couple of decades ago. And we are taking that and earning back the trust of Congress to give us even more going forward.

[Interviewer/Host]

But is that putting any more weight on the supplemental funding request, the $67 billion?

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

I think the. We need the supplemental, we need the reconciliation, and we need the budget to be passed on time. That will lead to the most secure country that the United States army can possibly Give it.

[Interviewer/Host]

So today is a lot about these low cost interceptors, drones, counter drones. Can you talk to me about how you assess what that mix should look like when it comes to the higher end interceptors in US Stockpiles?

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

So one of the big takeaways from Ukraine is the very first thing you must do is create a data layer. And what you want in your data layer is you want as many sensors and radars as humanly possible, and you want them to be able to fuse into tracks. And so practically what that means is you want to be able to give yourself and your allies as much warning as humanly possible. And so what the United States army has been focused on in the last couple of months is what we're calling Operation Jailbreak, which is basically, we have said we are no longer going to allow any sensor, any radar, any piece of equipment that we own to have data that is siloed. All of it is getting broken out, and all of it through APIs and SDKs is going to be able to share the data and receive data or actions. That is step one. Every new thing we're buying is already open source, so we're good. So once we have this data layer and anywhere American soldiers exist, we want that data layer to be as robust as humanly possible. The next step is to layer in effectors or interceptors. And you want as wide of a range of options as possible. On the cheapest, lowest side, you want a 50 cal round that might cost a dollar, and you want to be able to shoot that at something that's really close. On the highest end, you might want a PAC3 that's now $4.2 million or $4.4 million a shot. The key to defense in this layered concept is you want as many options as humanly possible, all tied into an agentix solution with a human in the loop that can choose between the right option at any given moment. And so the answer is actually, there's no one perfect answer. Variability is the key to success for conflict going forward.

[Interviewer/Host]

In the final minute that I have you, how much will initiatives like today compress timelines? Can you give us any context on how many years you're looking at when it comes to the army building up these stockpiles?

[US Army Official/Spokesperson]

So I think if you take the math of what, what we believe for a lot of these most exquisite interceptors and most exquisite offensive weapons, if it was taking 12 to 18 months each time to come to the range, and we're consolidating that down to, I am saying guarantee but I don't mean we will pay if we miss, but that is what we will hold ourselves publicly accountable. If you can get to the range every 30 days, what we hope to do is cut out at least a third of the R and D time, which will make a huge difference for soldiers.

[Podcast Announcer]

Health care doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get, and care that looks at the whole person how you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn [e-mail].