3/24/25: Glenn Greenwald Debates Saagar On Deportations, Bernie Rallies Thousands As Schumer Flails

Summary

Podcast Summary: Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar – Episode: "Glenn Greenwald Debates Saagar On Deportations, Bernie Rallies Thousands As Schumer Flails"

Release Date: March 24, 2025
Hosts: Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti
Guest: Glenn Greenwald
Publisher: iHeartPodcasts

---

1. Introduction

The episode kicks off with the hosts, Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti, setting the stage for a deeply analytical discussion focusing on recent deportation policies, Bernie Sanders' massive rallies, and the Democratic Party's strategic missteps under Chuck Schumer's leadership. The episode primarily features an in-depth debate with journalist Glenn Greenwald, shedding light on the complexities surrounding immigration law, due process, and the current political climate within the Democratic Party.

---

2. The Deportation Debate with Glenn Greenwald

a. Deportations of Venezuelan Migrants

The central discussion revolves around the controversial deportation of Venezuelan migrants deemed terrorists by the Trump administration to El Salvadorian prisons without proper due process. Saagar introduces the topic by highlighting Tom Homan's criticism regarding the lack of due process for these migrants.

Notable Quote:

[05:30] Glenn Greenwald: "Just like a lot of terrorists in this world, they're not in any terrorist database."

Greenwald emphasizes the precarious nature of such deportations, pointing out that many individuals labeled as gang members or terrorists lack formal criminal histories or inclusion in terror screening databases. This raises significant concerns about the accuracy and fairness of the deportation process.

b. Due Process and Constitutional Rights

Greenwald and Saagar delve into the importance of due process as enshrined in the Constitution. They draw parallels to historical instances, such as the post-9/11 era where similar due process violations occurred, leading to wrongful incarcerations.

Notable Quote:

[08:10] Saagar Enjeti: "...the idea that we have democratic processes and due process..."

Greenwald argues that stripping individuals of their right to contest accusations undermines foundational American values and poses a slippery slope toward authoritarianism. He underscores that due process is not merely a legal formality but a moral imperative to prevent governmental overreach and protect innocent lives.

c. Legal Processes for Deportations

The conversation shifts to the legal mechanisms governing deportations. Greenwald explains the complexities involved when the deporting country does not accept the deportees, using Guantanamo as a historical reference point where diplomatic negotiations eventually led to detainees being resettled globally.

Notable Quote:

[24:31] Saagar Enjeti: "Well, Guantanamo is a perfect example..."

He criticizes the rushed and punitive nature of current deportation practices, arguing that they lack the necessary diplomatic foresight and humanitarian considerations, thereby exacerbating the plight of already vulnerable individuals.

---

3. Bernie Sanders' Massive Rallies and Democratic Strategy

a. The "Fight Oligarchy Tour"

Bernie Sanders has embarked on a multi-week tour titled the "Fight Oligarchy Tour," drawing tens of thousands of attendees across the United States. These rallies signify a resurgence of grassroots activism within the Democratic base, focusing on dismantling corporate monopolies and advocating for working-class empowerment.

Notable Quote:

[39:10] Saagar Enjeti: "We overthrew a king of money. They control our economy..."

Krystal Ball and Ryan Grim commend Sanders for reigniting the progressive movement, drawing parallels to historical labor movements and the American Revolution. The immense crowd sizes demonstrate a renewed political engagement among traditionally disengaged demographics.

b. Strategic Missteps by the Democratic Party

Contrasting Sanders' populist approach, Chuck Schumer's leadership is portrayed as faltering, struggling to effectively combat rising oligarchic influences and maintain party cohesion.

Notable Quote:

[62:55] Dave Weigel: "They just look at people are mad. But Bernie, this is..."

Dave Weigel, a guest reporter, critiques Schumer's inability to present a compelling progressive agenda, noting that the party's focus on oversight hearings against Donald Trump lacks the substantive policy initiatives needed to galvanize the base.

---

4. Corruption and Government Contracts: Elon Musk's Starlink

The discussion briefly touches upon the allocation of billions in government contracts to Elon Musk's Starlink service. Greenwald critiques the potential for corruption and lack of transparency in awarding such lucrative deals, emphasizing the need for stricter oversight to prevent oligarchic influence over critical infrastructure.

Notable Quote:

[10:54] Ryan Grim: "We need your help to build the future of independent news media..."

This segment highlights concerns over governmental favoritism toward tech moguls, questioning the ethical implications and long-term impacts on national security and public trust.

---

5. Ongoing Israel Conflict

Krystal Ball and Saagar address the intensifying conflict in Israel, discussing its implications for regional stability and international relations. They examine the war's progression on the ground and the broader geopolitical consequences, urging for informed and balanced perspectives amidst widespread media coverage.

Notable Quote:

[42:28] Ryan Grim: "All right, people know that we're not getting anywhere with that argument."

The hosts stress the importance of nuanced reporting and analysis to comprehend the multifaceted nature of the conflict, beyond polarized political narratives.

---

6. Economic Indicators: The Uber Eats Financing Issue

An alarming economic sign discussed is the advent of financing options for everyday services like Uber Eats. The hosts express concern over the normalization of credit usage for basic needs, viewing it as a marker of financial instability and consumer debt escalation.

Notable Quote:

[07:18] Sagar Enjeti: "...it was number two..."

This segment serves as a commentary on broader economic trends, suggesting that such financial products could indicate underlying issues in the economy's resilience and consumer financial health.

---

7. Conservative Influencers and Big Soda Corruption

The podcast delves into allegations of corruption involving conservative influencers who reportedly received payments to promote big soda brands within food stamp programs. This segment scrutinizes the ethical boundaries of influencer marketing and its impact on public perception and policy.

Notable Quote:

[04:42] Krystal Ball: "...sponsoring this podcast and we are so grateful to them..."

The discussion underscores the growing concern over the intersection of marketing, political influence, and consumer welfare, advocating for greater accountability and transparency in such collaborations.

---

8. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

The episode concludes with reflections on the critical importance of maintaining democratic principles amid evolving political strategies and societal challenges. The hosts reiterate the necessity of due process, ethical governance, and genuine grassroots movements to counteract the rising tide of oligarchic power and political polarization.

Notable Quote:

[29:08] Glenn Greenwald: "People who trade liberty for security, security will get neither."

This closing remark encapsulates the episode's overarching theme: the indispensable value of liberty and due process as bulwarks against governmental overreach and authoritarianism.

---

Additional Notes

Throughout the episode, various advertisements and non-content segments are seamlessly integrated, emphasizing sponsors like Adam and Eve, Designer Shoe Warehouse, and CheapCaribbean.com. These segments are strategically placed and do not detract from the core discussions.

Example Advertisement Skip:

The podcast opens with promotional content for Adam and Eve and ends with similar ad segments, which are acknowledged but not detailed in the summary to maintain focus on substantive discussions.

---

Overall, this episode of Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar provides a thorough examination of critical issues surrounding immigration law, political strategies within the Democratic Party, economic indicators, and the ethical dimensions of influencer marketing. With insights from Glenn Greenwald and Dave Weigel, listeners gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges and dynamics shaping contemporary American politics.

Transcript

[Krystal Ball]

Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week for happiness, every night. You need Adam and Eve. Yes. I'm talking about sex toys. It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to AdamAndEve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off. Almost any one item plus free discreet shipping. That's AdamAndEve.com code IHEART for 50% OFF wanna pull off the season's freshest trends? You just need the right shoes. That's where designer shoe warehouse comes in. Loving wide leg jeans. Pair them with sleek low profile sneakers. Obsessed with the sheer trend. Try it with mesh flats, Feeling boho. Comfy sandals. Nail the whole free spirited thing. Find on trend shoes from the brands you like. Birkenstock, Nike, Adidas and more at dsw.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Good news. Your favorite Caribbean beaches are on [e-mail].

[Glenn Greenwald]

Cheapcaribbean.Com is your go to website for.

[Ryan Grim]

Finding the best deals on all inclusive vacation packages. They're all about getting you more sand for your dollar.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Check out their beach favorite sale to score $175 instant savings on bookings of.

[Ryan Grim]

Four nights or more to the Dominican.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Republic, Jamaica, Aruba and the Bahamas.

[Ryan Grim]

Offer ends April 1st. Go to CheapCaribbean.com to start saving. Hey guys, Sager and Krystal here.

[Krystal Ball]

Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election and we are so excited about what that means for.

[Ryan Grim]

The future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else.

[Krystal Ball]

So if that is something that's important.

[Sagar Enjeti]

To you, Please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today and you'll get access.

[Krystal Ball]

To our full shows unedited ad free.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And all put together for you every.

[Krystal Ball]

Morning in your inbox.

[Ryan Grim]

We need your help to build the future of independent news media and we hope to see [e-mail] Good morning everybody. Happy Monday. Have an amazing show for everybody. Today we have the Bro Show Ryan People live for the pound as they say. We've got a great show for everybody today. Man, this is tough. Crystal's on spring break with her children this week so she's having a great time and we hope that she's staying offline even though we know that she's.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Almost certain, she said she's gonna be.

[Ryan Grim]

Living on TikTok, she's gonna be making a lot of TikToks. Okay? So if you wanna see what she's up to, go and follow her TikTok account. Let's see what we got here. The toughest part of the job. We're gonna talk about deportations. I know everybody wants to hear more of that, except this time we've got. That's it. That's actually the whole show is just deportation. I'm joking. I'm joking. We've got Glenn Greenwald on the show. He's going to yell at me. I'm joking. We're all gonna talk about it. We're gonna talk about it and we're gonna have a great conversation around some of the legal issues, due process, what all of this means, how it could be done differently, the implications, et cetera. I'm really exc. Glenn about that. We're gonna talk about the rallies that they covered a little bit on Friday. Bernie Sanders really barnstorming the country, bringing tens of thousands of people to various different rallies. Some of the biggest rallies he's actually ever done in his entire career. Interesting juxtaposition with Chuck Schumer and the Democratic strategy. We're gonna talk about corruption, Elon Musk. Starlink is set to get billions of dollars in government contracts. We are going to talk about Steve Witkoff, who recently appeared on the Tucker Carlson show sounding a little bit of a different tune. Now on the Israel conflict, appears that they definitely, as the war continues on the ground there. We're gonna talk about the economy. Some various different signs inside of that. Perhaps the most troubling one to me is the fact that you can now finance your Uber Eats order. Can't think of a single worst financial decision and yet I'm sure it will be overwhelmingly popular. Finally, we're gonna talk about soda. Ryan, you and I just love this story. You know, a bunch of conservative influencers allegedly got caught taking money to shill for big soda on food stamp program. So we can talk about the efficacy of that, but also more what it says about the growing right wing influencer dumb as we see it interact with the corridors of power. Right. Should we do that? Okay, let's go ahead. Glenn Greenwald is standing by. Let's get to it. We're very excited now to be joined by friend of the show, Glenn Greenwald. He's here to yell at me and he's here to school me. He's here to educate me on my misgivings, my wrongs that I've made here on the show. But more importantly, he is here really as somebody who I just look to and so respect so deeply on these issues he's thought a lot about. So, Glenn, it's really great to see you.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Great to see you, Sagar. I obviously have a lot of things to yell at you about. If we did them all, it would take three hours.

[Dave Weigel]

That's right.

[Sagar Enjeti]

We're gonna focus on just one or two.

[Ryan Grim]

That's right. We're gonna focus just on one or two. Let's start with Tom Homan here responding to criticism that these migrants from Venezuela who were declared terrorists by the Trump administration were deported to an El Salvadorian prison with no due process. The response there from Tom Homan is that many victims of illegal immigration and crime themselves were not given due process. You had a very response to that. So let's play the clip and then we'll hear your take. Let's take a listen.

[Glenn Greenwald]

How do you determine or how do.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Your people in the field determine that somebody is a gang member? Doug, there's various methods I've noticed in the media. A lot of them don't have criminal histories. Well, a lot of gang members don't have criminal histories.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Just like a lot of terrorists in this world, they're not in any terrorist database.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Right. We only know information within databases based.

[Glenn Greenwald]

On, for instance, most terrorists we arrest.

[Sagar Enjeti]

That are identified U.S. government are later identified through a Title 3 investigation or through an undercover operation. They're not in any terror screening basket, screening database. We know that a lot of gang members, I started as a cop in 1984. Many gang members don't have a criminal history issue.

[Glenn Greenwald]

We have a count on social media.

[Sagar Enjeti]

We have count on surveillance techniques. We had to count on sworn statements from other gang members.

[Glenn Greenwald]

We had to count on, you know.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Wiretaps and Title 3. Everything involved with criminal investigations come into play.

[Glenn Greenwald]

So just because someone doesn't hasn't been.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Arrested and charged with a crime yet doesn't mean they're a member of a gang.

[Glenn Greenwald]

But how do you, I mean, what we've heard from lawyers representing some of.

[Sagar Enjeti]

These people is that they deny that.

[Glenn Greenwald]

They'Re members of this gang or either.

[Sagar Enjeti]

You know, Trent de Aragua or MS.13. Do they get a chance to prove that before you take them out of the country and put them into a.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Notorious prison in a country that they're not even from?

[Sagar Enjeti]

I mean, do they have any due process at all? Due process? What Was Lake and Riley's due process? Where were all these young women that were killed and raped by members of tda? Where was their due process?

[Glenn Greenwald]

Well, the people that did that should be prosecuted by subway.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Where's her due process? The bottom line is that plane was.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Full of people designated as terrorists, number one.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Number two, every Venezuelan migrant on that flight was a TDA member. Based on numerous criminal investigations, on intelligence reports, and a lot of work by ICE officers.

[Ryan Grim]

Glenn, what do you make of that argument?

[Sagar Enjeti]

First of all, it's kind of weird because the older you get, the more you realize that history really does just repeat itself, and not by century, but even by decade. We're back in 2002 where we're hearing all of the arguments from the Bush and Cheney administration that they have the right to do anything they want to people they and they alone have decided are terrorists. And that includes putting people into prison indefinitely with no due process, torturing them, kidnapping them, rendering them whatever else they wanted to do. And when people objected and said, wait a minute, these people don't even have an opportunity to go into court and disprove or contest the accusations that you've made against them, that they're not part of a terrorist organization, what we heard was, don't worry. We vetted these people, and we can assure you that these people are not just terrorists, but they're the worst of the worst. As it turns out, many. According to Colin Powell's chief of staff, Larry Wilkinson, most ended up not being part of any terrorist organization. They were picked up randomly. The intelligence was wrong, sometimes vindictively. People reported them to the US Military, all kinds of reasons. The government makes mistakes. And that's the whole point of due process, is we don't trust just one branch of government to do something as cataclysmic as throw people into a dungeon for life without even bothering to have to present evidence that they're guilty and giving the people who are so accused the opportunity to contest it. And the other point that he made that makes absolutely no sense, and a police officer should know this better than anyone, is due process is most necessary for people who are accused of horrific crimes. Lake and Riley's killers didn't just get thrown in a dungeon because the government decided that they were guilty. They were given lawyers, formal charges, went through all of our judicial procedures, were found guilty in a court of law and sentenced to life in prison without parole. So the idea that, of course, no murderers, no kidnappers, no rapists give their victims due process, but we still give due process to the people who are accused of criminality before we can punish them. Because the founders knew first and foremost that humans are not infallible and they're going to make mistakes. And we've made mistakes all the time. Even with due process. We've convicted people wrongly and unjustly. Imagine how many mistakes get made when you just hand over the power to government officials in the executive branch, just declare who and who is not guilty with no opportunity for the person who's accused to disprove the charges. And that is exactly what's happening.

[Ryan Grim]

Glenn. I think what's made this so difficult for me is it feels dispositionally as if the law is something that is being almost used in a process way, not just due process, but it's one where it feels as if the Constitution and the law seems to apply only for deportation, but it didn't necessarily apply, let's say, when people were being allowed into the country and then were victimizing people who were here. It does feel, at least to me, as if this argumentation and this love of due process, et cetera, only comes into play whenever it's the supposedly sympathetic group here, let's say, of migrants. When we don't necessarily hear the same for, let's say, people who are coming here illegally committing crimes, then it's like, oh, well, of course, this is something that is naturally to happen. They have a lower, let's say, crime rate than the natural born population. The implication that you shouldn't even worry about. So for people like me who have really complicated feelings about this stuff, how should we feel watching this and trying to balance those two issues of wanting, let's say, mass deportation, the selective application, let's say, of concern, what would you say to those critics?

[Sagar Enjeti]

Well, the whole reason Trump has made this signature issue of mass deportation and he won twice, and polls clearly show, in addition to that, that people support mass deportation was because the idea was that people entering our country illegally have done something wrong, have done something criminal. So the idea is, oh, because they didn't give us due process or they didn't get due process, we should now relinquish due process, is essentially to say, let's copy and replicate and adopt the worst abuses of the policies that Donald Trump for a decade has been most harshly criticizing. I think the bigger point, though, is that when Donald Trump has stood up for a decade now and argued for mass deportation, typically, mass deportation, not just typically, but almost in every case, means that you take somebody who is in your country illegally and you send them back to their country of origin. You send them back to where they're a citizen or where they came from. That is always how deportation works. The reason this has become so controversial is because the Trump administration is not picking up Venezuelans or others and sending them back to their country of origin. They're sending them on purpose to a third country that these people have nothing to do with. They're not citizens of El Salvador. Most of them, if not all of them, have never been to El Salvador. And the reason we're sending them to El Salvador is because we know they have a repressive prison system, probably the worst in the world, where they're not only going to be humiliated and tortured and stripped of all human rights, but it's extremely unlikely that they're ever going to leave. So this is a radical departure from what we think of and called deportation. This is consigning somebody not just to life in prison, but to one of the worst prisons, life in one of the worst prisons that people very rarely leave. And if you don't believe that the government, the US Government, under the Constitution, owes people the right of due process, of a hearing, of an opportunity to disprove the accusations, not before we deport them back to their country of origin, but before we send them on purpose to a hellhole of a prison that they're likely never going to leave prison for life without even an inkling of a process, a requirement, the government show the evidence and the opportunity of the person so accused to contest it. Then you don't believe in due process at all. Then you simply believe in an authoritarian government that can just accuse people in secret of being guilty. And that's the end of the story. And that has never been the founding value of the United States. You mentioned the Benjamin Franklin quote that I had cited where he said it is more just to allow 100 guilty people to go free than to punish wrongfully a single innocent person. That comes from Blackstone, which is the foundation of American and British law. Thomas Jefferson is attributed to say something very similar, but certainly all of his writings and all of the founders writings, that was the idea. Let me just give you a quick example. We impose limits on police officers that make it more difficult for them to catch violent criminals. They're not, for example, allowed to just burst into houses where they suspect that somebody guilty might be there. They first have to go to a court, get a warrant, and we require that. Even knowing that sometimes it's gonna mean that violent criminals get away because we're putting barriers in front of the police. But we're a country of liberty. We've decided we would rather have those liberties even if there's a cost to it. And due process is exactly that. And it's something foundational to the United States. And it can't be waived simply because people are frustrated with illegal immigration, especially when it's not sending them back to their home country, but putting them into a horrific prison in a dictatorial country in El Salvador, where you've seen all the video of things that they do to these people that would never be permitted in the United States.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And there's also that famous quote, you know, people who trade liberty for security, security will get neither. And just to sketch in how that unfolded in this moment, we can just very quickly run through a couple of the examples, because we're talking about the question on principle, but also in practice, we see exactly what unfolded. Roll A two really quickly. This is just like this gay barber who is like, we're asking people to just use their common sense. Does this dude look like a thug from the Trend Aragua gang?

[Sagar Enjeti]

It's like, no, he looks like James Charles, one of those gay, like, beauty influencers.

[Ryan Grim]

I think he is a makeup artist.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Trend like welcoming with open arms openly gay, flamboyantly gay hairdressers who fled Venezuela claiming persecution on LGBT grounds. You think that's a likely member of a Trend Aragua gang? Or shouldn't there at least be a hearing about that first to determine if he's guilty?

[Glenn Greenwald]

Let's hear the charges. So then a three. This is one we wrote about over at Dropsite. Reyes Barrios. He's a professional goalkeeper who protested the Maduro regime kicking off his opposition from the presidential ballot. He had a hearing scheduled for April 17 to make his case for political asylum. He was actually removed from maximum security prison after his family was able to get an affidavit from the tattoo artist that was like, no, this crown is related to Real Madrid, his favorite soccer team. And so that ice is finally like, okay, we'll let him out of maximum security prison very quickly. They instead, they just end up deporting him and taking him out. DHS stood behind that one in a comment to us saying, you know, we feel like the tattoo was gang related at the same time. And you can put up a four while I'm talking about this. They have acknowledged, actually, this is just a bunch of other people who was their family are saying, no, these are just tattoos. These guys have nothing to do with gangs. DHS has said 101 of the people, this is for his autistic. This guy is for his autistic brother. This is like the autistic awareness and acceptance symbol 101 of the people that were deported. They don't claim we're in a gang. Yet every time we come with evidence that this guy is not a gang, DHS responds, they're actually in a gang. Now, I don't really have a question, because I agree with you on this one. All right, let me just be a potted plant for the rest of this conversation. Just wanted to add that.

[Ryan Grim]

No, I think this is all fair. And this is what I think makes the difficulty. Again, I'll just explain for me, I feel as if that the law was not applied for several years. Millions of people illegally entered our country. And often the discussion for those years, if we brought up someone like Lake and Riley or the victim of crime in that respect, it was, oh, well, that is simply the consequence of Ryan, let's say, in your case, of our meddling in Venezuela, almost as if we deserve it, right, for that to happen. And. Or lawlessness of not taking the names of many of these people or not pursuing deportation or detainers, or the willful either expulsion from, let's say, from prison during. Without bail. And it seems as if here we can highlight these examples, of course, of which, look, it is clear that there were, like, terrible mistakes done. I don't even disagree with you, Glenn, on a human level. And I think I am coming around to your point of view. It just does feel, you know, for. In terms of, let's say, the sympathy and who we decide to, like, look at these things, has eroded much of the discourse around this. And so both at an emotional level and also with what Ryan is saying. Cause I'm sure there are a lot of people who listen to this who probably initially had my response as well. What do you think that they need to hear both about not only equal application of the law, but why it is so important what you're saying.

[Sagar Enjeti]

So I do absolutely agree that we have democratically ratified a program of mass deportation. There's all polls showing across political lines that people believe that the massive inflow of people into our country who aren't documented, who have no right to be here, who cross the border illegally, is a huge problem and needs to be rectified. And again, I think Trump has won a Democratic mandate to mass deport people who are in the United States illegally and to close the border. I don't have any doubts about that. Whether I agree with that. Policy or not, that is the Democratic decision. There is a process in place, though, that is designed to do that. You can deport people. Obama and Trump in his first term and Biden in his first term deported a lot of people, and you can deport a lot more legally using the legal mechanisms that are set up. The problem with, with Biden was not that there aren't legal processes sufficient to deport a lot of people. The problem is the Democrats had no political will to do so. They were controlled by pro immigration groups. But if you want to, you can abide by the law and mass deport at the same time and minimally safeguard human rights and the ability of people not to be wrongly accused. And I don't think we would even be having this debate, Sagar, if not for the fact that Trump gets in. There hasn't really been mass deportations, by the way.

[Ryan Grim]

No, there has not. The number that's very important. There has not been mass.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Right?

[Dave Weigel]

Yeah.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And what we're getting instead are distractions from kind of exploiting the idea of mass deportation first to go after people who are in the country legally, green card holders and visas who are being expelled for the crime of criticizing and protesting against Israel, which I know you. You do not support. And so part of that is an exploitation for a completely different issue. But the other part is deportations are not about sending people to prison for life that deep. We've never regarded life in prison as an appropriate punishment for people who enter our country, especially in a country that's not theirs. That is only appropriate prison for people who are proven to have committed violent crimes. And there's a lot of doubt about whether the people sent to El Salvador were, in fact, guilty. And even if there wasn't doubt, even if they all seemed kind of guilty based on this very tenuous art of interpreting people's tattoos, which, by the way, liberals did with Pete Hegseth in a way that turned out to be completely misguided. There was a New Yorker fact checker, Talia Levine, who accused an ICE agent of having a Nazi tattoo. She had to quit because she misinterpreted the tattoo. These are very, very thin reads on which to proclaim somebody guilty. If it had just been the kind of deportation that Trump was promising, I don't think there'd be a controversy. The problem is, is that these are not deportations in the traditional sense of the word. And we should have learned from the war on terror that if the government says, trust us, everyone we're punishing is guilty, you don't need a hearing. You don't need to see the evidence. We know for sure people are going to be wrong, wrongfully accused. And there's a big difference between just sending them back to their home country. Although that can be pretty devastating for people here a long time are married to an American citizen, as Mul Khalid is. But it's still way worse to send them to a dungeon in El Salvador with no due process. Hey, everyone. Welcome back to Bachelor Happy Hour. I'm Joe.

[Krystal Ball]

And I'm Serena.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And we are here with the Iheart Music Awards and David's Bridal who are.

[Krystal Ball]

Sponsoring this podcast and we are so grateful to them.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Thank you. Thank you for finishing my sentence. And we are here with our favorites, Dot and Charity.

[Ryan Grim]

Where were you in bikinis in the Snow?

[Krystal Ball]

Montana.

[Ryan Grim]

Okay.

[Krystal Ball]

She flew out and joined you guys.

[Ryan Grim]

Isn't it cold?

[Krystal Ball]

No, it was. We. Well, yeah. Bikinis in the snow. We risk getting hypothermia for those photos.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Wow.

[Krystal Ball]

They were sick though.

[Sagar Enjeti]

I don't get bikinis in the snow.

[Ryan Grim]

Just like an aesthetic. Yeah.

[Sagar Enjeti]

If him and I did that, if we did like speedos in the snow.

[Dave Weigel]

You guys would be like douchebag.

[Ryan Grim]

Bags in the snow would be hilarious.

[Krystal Ball]

I would be like, let's see it.

[Dave Weigel]

Come on.

[Ryan Grim]

I would not complain to do stuff like that. He's like, no.

[Krystal Ball]

That's going to be the name of this podcast episode.

[Ryan Grim]

Bachelor Happy Hour. Speedos in the snow.

[Sagar Enjeti]

David's Bridal. If you're listening, branding a little bit.

[Ryan Grim]

Sponsored by David's Bridal. Bridal Speedos in the snow.

[Krystal Ball]

This is Jenny Garth from I do part two.

[Sagar Enjeti]

You could have lost 10 pounds already if you started one month ago. So are you ready to start today? Find out if weight loss meds are right for you in just three minutes at try fh.com try fh.com results vary.

[Krystal Ball]

Based on start weight and adherence to diet, exercise and program goals.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a health care services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.

[Krystal Ball]

Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness, every night. You need Adam and Eve. Yes. I'm talking about sex toys. It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to AdamAndEve.com now. And enter code IHEART for 50% off. Almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's AdamAndEve.com, code iHeart for 50% off.

[Ryan Grim]

Glenn, what is the legal process that the government has to follow? Let's say, like, I know this happened with a lot of Gitmo detainees, where we're like, okay, we want to send them back, but then their country's like, no, we don't want them back. So. And this was some of the wrangling that I'd seen as well, that while the Venezuelan government has agreed to accept some deportation flights, let's say in the case of many of these migrants to the United States, if they did not want to, except then what process must the government follow? Because it does feel a bit preposterous that if the government doesn't want to accept them, that they have to, let's say, stay here on the dime of the U.S. taxpayer.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Well, Guantanamo is a perfect example. You may remember that at one time, there was an excess of 1,000 detainees at Guantanamo, again, who we were told were the worst of the worst, the incorrigible terrorists who would never be recuperated. And now there's fewer than 40 people. What happened to all of those people? Apparently, they got released because the government realized, or they proved in court that they weren't actually threats, terrorist threats. They didn't belong to a terrorist organization. And sometimes their countries didn't want them back. But the US Used diplomacy and was able to place them all, all throughout the world. They didn't get sent back to prison. They were put into other countries. Some of them are, like, in Caribbean Island. The United States is a very powerful country. We have all sorts of ways diplomatically to do deals with other countries, including with Venezuela, that has now said they're going to accept the deported Venezuelan citizens. So this was not, Sagar, an attempt to just be like, we don't really have anything to do with them because Venezuela won't accept them. This was a huge rush that was designed really to be deterrence, to say, if you come into our country illegally, we're going to make examples of these people and we're going to make videos of it, with them being humiliated and stripped of their humanity. And it was done in a very rushed fashion. There was no real attempt to diplomatically negotiate with Venezuela or anybody else who might take them. The whole cruelty and horror of the process, again, without due process, was part of what they were purposely trying to do. And that is not an appropriate means of the justice system. To make that's what monarchs used to do, is they would cut off people's heads who they heard were criticizing them, and then hang them in the town square as a warning to others who might do that. That is not American justice. That has nothing to do with our value system. It's a huge assault on it. And I think there's obvious ways for the US Government diplomatically to get these people back to their home countries.

[Ryan Grim]

Last question for you, Glenn, from me is why does due process for illegal immigrants matter? That's something that I really struggle with, is just this idea. You can come to the United States, you can violate our laws, you can then receive better treatment, you know, than you would in your own home country. And we're almost like a victim of our own compassion and of our openness when we didn't enforce a law and then are required to enforce the law. Once you are here illegally, why do you think that it matters? And I did not even realize until I started listening to you that the precedence for due process for people presenting the country illegally goes all the way back to the 1800s. So it's pretty clear that we have been grappling with this question for a long time, but it's obviously been politically controversial. So why do you think it matters? Matters even for illegal immigrants? For, of course, people like Mahmoud Khalil and others.

[Sagar Enjeti]

The Bill of Rights was never intended to be, and the courts have never interpreted as a kind of list of privileges that only a certain group of human beings possess, namely American citizens. In fact, the 14th Amendment was deliberately written to say that any persons inside the United States, not citizens, but persons, not even legally here, but just persons in general, human beings, have the right of the equal, equal protection of the law. They have the right of due process. And that's why this is not some invention of liberal courts in the 1960s, as you say, it goes back to the 1800s. And again, when the United States put obviously all non citizens in Guantanamo. The Supreme Court in 2008 ruled that even though they're non citizens, because they're under US Sovereignty, they have the right of habeas corpus, the right to go into court and to demonstrate that the charges against them are illegal. And the reason is the Bill of Rights is not a list of privileges assigned to particular people. It's a constraint on the US Government with regard to everybody under their control. And the reason is, is because it's simply so inherently morally unjust, horrifyingly unjust, to do something like throw someone into prison for life. Without any opportunity for them to prove that that is an unjust punishment. Deportation itself, real deportation, sending them back to the country of order has a very minimal standard of due process. It's just a kind of immigration court within the Justice Department. And as long as they're here illegally and the government can prove that they'll approve them going back to their country of origin. You don't have to prove guilt or crime. The crime is entering the country illegally. We're talking about something much, much different here. And I think that's the reason it has become so alarming. And it's not just alarming in these cases, but as a precedent that will obviously expand outward in a way that we saw happen repeatedly in the Cold War, the war on terror, and every other abuse of civil liberties.

[Glenn Greenwald]

The only other point I'd make is these are radical ideas. Free speech, protection of people who are accused of crimes of due process for every person, whether they're a citizen or not. Like, we are unique around the world in defending these liberties. And like I said, it is like, you go to other countries, they're like, this whole First Amendment thing you have, this is a radical idea. And it's just not accepted in a lot of other places that you have these liberties. And so in dark times like this, you got like, that's when you really have to defend them. Or then we're just like, then what are we then? Anyway, so that. That's my. That's. That's my only point. I don't know if. Any final thoughts, Glenn?

[Ryan Grim]

Any final thoughts here?

[Sagar Enjeti]

No, I think that. I think it's a crucial point. And I would just add one thing, which is that one of the ways that governments traditionally try and get around the constraints on them from the Constitution is to try and say we're in wartime and therefore we can't afford those. And as I'm sure you know, this 17, this Aliens Enemies act was invoked only three times in history. The War of 1812, World War I, World War II, where even then it was very sketchy. Courts were very skeptical of the right to deny due process based on it. The idea that mass immigration is some kind of a war in the traditional sense, where Congress declares war against the foreign power, that in itself is extremely dangerous because that is what we saw in World War II. An attempt to impose a war paradigm on what really was a criminal problem of international terrorism that we could solve with due processing ports. And if you just allow the government to declare war willy nilly, and therefore all the powers that go with it, the Constitution's just gonna become illusory, cuz the government can just get around it by saying, we're at war. We're war against this problem. This problem, this problem. And that, I think, is maybe the most dangerous theory that the Trump administration is promulgating.

[Ryan Grim]

Well, Glenn, you've always given me a lot to think about. I think you have convinced me. But it's a difficult emotional process to get here. And I really do thank you for coming on the show, for being willing to do this, and for just continuing to always stand up when you believe. And you're one of my heroes that's out there. So thank you.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Thanks, Zagre. I appreciate you having me on knowing that we were gonna. That I was gonna yell at you.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Well, it's good.

[Ryan Grim]

It's good for me. I think it makes me stronger.

[Dave Weigel]

Right?

[Sagar Enjeti]

All right.

[Ryan Grim]

We appreciate you, Glenn. Thanks very much.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Good talking to you guys. Hey, everyone. Welcome back to Bachelor Happy Hour. I'm Joe.

[Krystal Ball]

And I'm Serena.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And we are here with the Iheart Music Awards and David's Bridal who are.

[Krystal Ball]

Sponsoring this podcast and we are so grateful to them.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Thank you. Thank you for finishing my sentence. And we are here with our favorites, Dot and Charity.

[Ryan Grim]

Where were you in bikinis in the snow?

[Krystal Ball]

Montana.

[Ryan Grim]

Okay.

[Krystal Ball]

She flew out and joined you guys.

[Ryan Grim]

Isn't it cold?

[Krystal Ball]

No, it was we. Well, yeah. Bikinis in the snow. We risk getting hypothermia for those photos.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Wow.

[Krystal Ball]

They were sick, though.

[Sagar Enjeti]

I don't get bikinis in the snow.

[Ryan Grim]

Just like an aesthetic. Yeah.

[Sagar Enjeti]

If him and I did that, if we did like speedos in the snow, you guys would be like douchebag bags.

[Ryan Grim]

In the snow would be hilarious.

[Krystal Ball]

I would be like, let's see it.

[Dave Weigel]

Come on.

[Ryan Grim]

I would not complain to do stuff like that. He's like, no.

[Krystal Ball]

That's going to be the name of this podcast episode.

[Ryan Grim]

Bachelor Happy Hour. Speedos in the snow.

[Sagar Enjeti]

David's Bridal. If you're listening, branding a little bit.

[Ryan Grim]

Sponsored by David's Bridal Bridal Speedos in the Snow.

[Krystal Ball]

This is Ashley Aett from the Ben and Ashley I Almost Famous podcast. If you could lose 10.4 pounds in one month, would you try? Well, with Future Health, you can find out if weight loss meds are right for you in just 3 minutes at tri fh.com that is try fh.com try fh.com results may vary based on start weight and adherence to diet, exercise and program goals. Database on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a Health care services. Provider meds are prescribed at provider's discretion. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week for happiness, every night. You need Adam and Eve. Yes. I'm talking about sex toys. It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to AdamAndEve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off. Almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's AdamAndEve.com, code IHEART for 50% Off.

[Ryan Grim]

All right, let's go ahead and get to these rallies, and then afterwards, we're gonna talk a little bit to Dave Weigel, reporter at semafor, who actually was on the ground for some of these, and he spoke to the participants involved. Let's put the first part up here on the screen. This is just some images that came out of these rallies all across the United States as part of the quote, Fight Oligarchy Tour by Bernie Sanders. I mean, it looks. You gotta respect the game. Crowds matter. As we Learned in the 2016 presidential campaign, both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump were able to bring out just tens of thousands of people who aren't really normally engaged in politics. And what's fascinating about this one, Ryan, is not only the sheer crowd size, but also the makeup of those crowd sizes. So a Pernie AOC rally. You and I have been covering this for a while. You know, it's got a certain aesthetic. It's got a certain. It's got a certain group.

[Glenn Greenwald]

My likes.

[Ryan Grim]

Yeah, they're fish heads, as Ryan can announce. This time around, though, there's some moms there. There's some people there that are traditionally part of the progressive left wing movement. And something that we always respect here on this show is not only crowd size, but the ability to build new coalitions. Donald Trump very effective at. And Bernie in his waning days, arguably the most impressive feat of his political career so far.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And you have some right wing commentators, influencers, whatever you want to call them, who are throwing cold water on this and saying, according to, you know, our cell phone analysis of these characters who are out there protesting, you know, these folks have also gone to Black Lives Matter protest as well.

[Ryan Grim]

Like a.

[Glenn Greenwald]

If you're American and you're remotely in the center or the left, you were at a Black Lives Matter.

[Ryan Grim]

They were like that's true.

[Glenn Greenwald]

20 million people or something.

[Dave Weigel]

There were a lot.

[Glenn Greenwald]

It was basically everybody.

[Dave Weigel]

That's right.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And they said, and it's not grassroots because we have identified that this organization, Indivisible, was involved with helping to organize these rallies. Indivisible is an organic grassroots organization that does get some like foundation funding. But that doesn't mean it isn't a membership based and like powered organization where you have like an Indivisible in Chevy Chase. And Indivisible. All of these little town neighborhoods have Indivisible chapters. Those are generally Normie Democrats. They came out of the Women's March era. So the fact that they are at a Bernie AOC rally does not undercut the kind of potential that it shows. It actually fuels it. Because it's like, oh, now you've got the normie Dems who are showing up at a Bernie rally. That's a change.

[Ryan Grim]

Well, Ryan, as you and I know, oppositions always like to downplay the grassroots element.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And actually, like I said with the T Party, this.

[Ryan Grim]

Exactly. And so let's take it back to 2010. And so I was a student here in Washington. We were awash in crowds. We had the Glenn Beck rally. I'll never forget. That was actually while I was moving into my dorm, my freshman year dorm. I was stunned. I was like, oh my God. I was like, something is happening here in Washington. The entire city is taken over by all of these like anti Obamacare protesters. Glenn Beck's rally, I mean that was hundreds of thousands of people. What was the comment? Oh, they're being bussed in by the Koch, the Koch brothers. And it's like, yeah, that might even be true. But guess what? They still are showing up to vote. As most people know, it's pretty rare to actually physically being paid to go to a protest. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. Certainly does. But at a mass level. No, that's not true. Providing organization buses and all that is a long standing part of all political coalitions. The Donald Trump campaign used that to great effect. Of course. Try and make sure that your rallies are always crowded. This is like standard political stuff. The fact is, is when you have all these people here, it means something. Now we don't know what yet, but it definitely means something to me.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And one fun irony though. The only person who really flagrantly actively paid people to be part of their political operation is Elon Musk.

[Sagar Enjeti]

He's like, I'll pay.

[Glenn Greenwald]

I will pay you $100.

[Ryan Grim]

It worked out though.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And it worked out, right?

[Glenn Greenwald]

That's right. So it's hilarious that he would be like pointing fingers at this, but you're so right. And at the time I remember the left saying this is all Koch brothers stuff. And my argument to the left was this, this type of COPE screws you because you need an objective, clear eyed analysis of your opposition or else you're not going to see what their assets are and you won't be able to come at them and defend your own position. And the Kochs were funding the right for decades at that point and had never managed to bring hundreds of thousands of people out to the mall.

[Ryan Grim]

Very true.

[Glenn Greenwald]

The fact of the money is sometimes necessary to get the people out there, but it's not sufficient. Yes, you have to have actual organic.

[Ryan Grim]

Yeah, People need to be pissed off, people need to be mad, people need to be politically engaged.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And these foundations were funding indivisible to the tune of a couple hundred thousand dollars two years ago, but they weren't pulling forty dollars.

[Ryan Grim]

If all this money mattered, Joe Biden would be President of the United States or Kamala could still be President of the United States. We wouldn't know anything. Kamala Harris would have gone, exactly. People matter. Actually, they matter more than anything. And so we've got some clips here from Bernie Sanders which I think if I had to, you know, as people here know, I've got the softest spot in my of all the Democrats. It's Bert Bernie for me, he's the og. I have a very difficult time, especially.

[Glenn Greenwald]

When he goes the anti immigrant route.

[Ryan Grim]

Yeah, that's your old school. We'll talk about that. Especially his old school stuff. I just think the guy, I don't know, there's something about him, he tugs at my heartstrings. And something I appreciate the most about Bernie is to me, Bernie just feels American. And that is what really hit home in some of these speeches. Let's take a listen.

[Glenn Greenwald]

We don't want a king in the United States.

[Sagar Enjeti]

We overthrew a king of money. They control our economy, they own much of the media and they have enormous influence over our political system. But from the bottom of my heart.

[Glenn Greenwald]

I am convinced that they can be defeated.

[Krystal Ball]

We need a Democratic party that fights harder for us too.

[Ryan Grim]

That means our communities, each and every.

[Sagar Enjeti]

One of us, choosing and voting for.

[Krystal Ball]

Democrats and elected officials who know how.

[Sagar Enjeti]

To stand for the working class. Our job is to break up the big corporate monopolies that are screwing us every single day. Bring down housing prices for good. Bring down grocery prices for good, Require good living wages for a full day's work. Put power back in the hands of everyday people from Arizona to Texas, all across America.

[Ryan Grim]

All right? So very. I mean, look, you have to respect it. And like I said, at the top there for Bernie, I remember his most effective political ad, the America ad 2016 also here, bringing back to the spirit of the American Revolution and or the labor movement, something that he's very intimately familiar with and he's been running on for quite some time. And I do think that that is a very potent political message right now. And it's, I think, important for him, you know, with the oligarchy tour there, not only against Elon and some of the political feelings, but in terms of, like, where this movement can go. Because, again, as you and I know, the reason why the Tea Party was funded to the tune that it was, was to specifically direct grassroots anger, which, let's all be honest, people didn't care about Obamacare.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Okay.

[Ryan Grim]

They just hated Obama. But they wanted to take that feeling around that and channel it into an agenda that was well planned. Right. So you could give. This is where leadership really matters at a political level, not only in terms of the organization at the top, but electing and selecting candidates that specifically agreed, let's say, on the debt ceiling or Obamacare and all that, and telling them what their mandate was. So, yes, you need to fight, but you need to fight specifically on a set of issues. Now, last time around, the Donald Trump resistance of 2017 was built physically around Donald Trump. It was specifically built around, oh, we need to impeach Trump or show he's not Democratic. That doesn't mean anything. Right. And especially if it's built on a bullshit lie, which is what Russiagate was. This time around, though, if you have an actual critique.

[Dave Weigel]

Right.

[Ryan Grim]

Of what a policy level is, that will lead you. That's the decision tree from which everything happens. If and when you do get elected in 20 for the midterms, what type of hearings you call. Are you gonna be doing Russiagate hearings or are we gonna, let's say, a Starlink hearing? I can tell you which one's gonna be more politically palatable, by the way. It's definitely gonna be the latter one.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Yes. And that was Greg Cassar at the end there, who I didn't know he.

[Ryan Grim]

Had that in him. He's actually not bad.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Yeah.

[Ryan Grim]

I'll be honest, after he was on the show, I wasn't that impressed by.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Here I was like, we had him on a Friday show. Yes. And he's really, he's in his element when he's fighting the billionaires and the oligarchs. Did you see John Ossoff?

[Ryan Grim]

Yes, I did. I was stunned, actually, to see because I'm like, okay, that's where, you know, my critic hat comes in. It's like, all right, dude, you know, we're talking about oligarchs and billionaires. Like, come on. All right, let's remember a little Mr. Ossoff's career here in Washington and exactly who got him elected.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Hold on now, I'm an Ossoff hipster here. Ossoff defender. When he was a Hill staffer, he.

[Ryan Grim]

Used to go to your parties, right?

[Glenn Greenwald]

Yeah. And like, he was. We can say this at this point now, I know, like, Lee Fong knew him well. And he was. He was one of the Hill staffers who was the most aggressive against surveillance, civil liberties, the nsa, CIA. He was a threat to that national security, deep state. Yeah, he was also working. He was also doing, like, documentaries in Africa about colonialism and corruption and prison conditions. And I think the Ossoff you're seeing now is the actual one. Not the politically curated, not the Obama impersonating one of like the 2017 House race, but his last couple of Senate runs, he's been like, if that's the Democratic Party, that's a cool Democratic Party. And so if you missed Ossoff, he was saying he was making the point that the Trump Cabinet, I think is worth Something like $60 billion before you get to Trump and Elon Musk, he's like, they are the elites that they're telling you that they're coming after. And I don't know if it's too late. So part of this almost feels like poignant now the Democrats are finally getting it when. And there's been room on the left for this and there's been hunger on the left for this class based Bernie Sanders, the millionaires and the billionaires. The 1%. That analysis flowing out of the Occupy Wall street analysis, it's been there. And then it got diverted first by the Hillary Clinton campaign and then by the kind of Great Awokening from 20 2017.

[Ryan Grim]

Well, I don't think it's an accident. The great awokening actually happened the exact same year as Occupy 2013. That was the exact time that we both had the Occupy Wall street movement and you had the Great awokening. The Great Awakening is a term that actually does have meaning, by the way. You can go and look at the skyrocketing use of, you know, quote Unquote work woken terminology that it does not an accident. Also that 2015, the Obergefell case happens in the entire landscape of social politics and America changes.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Our system is so. Our capitalist system is so good at protecting its own interests that it's able to kind of produce these antibodies to actual threats to it. It spotted a real threat to it in the form of Occupy and Bernie and this energy and the antibody was this great awokening.

[Ryan Grim]

That's. Yeah.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And so now has the antibody faded but it might be too late like now maybe the oligarchs are in firm control.

[Ryan Grim]

Well I think what makes it too late are not only the.

[Glenn Greenwald]

We have a terminal condition at this point.

[Ryan Grim]

We not only have an 11 year legacy here of the great awokening which is if you think about that, that means that a 8 year old at that time now grew up and became politically conscious in a quote unquote woke period. And attitudes have significantly changed among. So we didn't unfortunately on Thursday didn't have time to go into the analysis there. The best analysis, the 28 million survey of voters and specifically how different white college educators women are than the rest of the population. White college educated women of course being one of the bedrocks of the Democratic Party and especially with the divide in income and in class that we now see where a lot of lower income Americans and or non white Americans find themselves Republicans or at the very least Trump voters and Trump not as Trump skeptical. Whereas like resistance in and of itself is kind of cringe and is basically the what the home of the liberal base. Now look, a lot can change of course, you know, people change all the time.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Think about what the great awokening left us with in 2015 as Sanders is rising. The big problem that was associated with him according to all his critics, too many young white men. Yeah, it was toxic who were angry who were supporting him. Bernie Bros. Now the problem Democrats has is they are all Trump supporters.

[Ryan Grim]

Yeah. Yeah, you're right. It is funny because that prototypical Bernie Breaux is now the prototypical podcast bro who is the, you know, Republican working.

[Glenn Greenwald]

With T levels or whatever.

[Ryan Grim]

Literally the Joe Rogan pipeline is real in Rogan's case. I would say actually in a lot of these guys, cases, people who are. I know quite a few of them, like they're not Republicans by any means. They don't really care about tax policy or something like that. They're much more either radicalized on social issues and or just very anti establishment. They feel like the left is just too deeply tied to the overall Commanding heights of establishment.

[Glenn Greenwald]

I understand.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Yeah.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And they gave up on the idea that. That there could be collective change in this country. And so they've channeled that energy inward. They're gonna work out more. They're gonna worry about the different roles. Plus elect Trumps they take.

[Ryan Grim]

Because Trump is what? Trump is a wrecking ball.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Right.

[Ryan Grim]

It's like, well, that's all the best that we can do. It's kind of a screw you to everybody. It was interesting. Now the media is taking notice. Here we have ABC News, John, Carl, talking about Bernie Sanders and his rise. Let's take a listen.

[Sagar Enjeti]

How's the Democratic Party doing? Challenging us?

[Ryan Grim]

They gotta be a little tougher.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Quit being a bunch of doormats.

[Ryan Grim]

Feels like we're left stranded when everything feels like it's crumbling. So you can see people are mad. But Bernie, this is. Again, gotta appreciate the guy. Bernie has an actual worldview. He doesn't just go with the tides. Okay. He does sometimes, if we're all being honest, on Ukraine, on pro life, few other things, especially on blm, gun syndrome. Guns, guns, yeah. But on immigration, he's always had something to say. And that's why there's a lot of people on the left. They don't know what to do with this Bernie, the guy who he's always been. Let's take a listen.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Is there anything that you think Trump has done?

[Ryan Grim]

Right?

[Glenn Greenwald]

Yeah, I mean, I think cracking down.

[Sagar Enjeti]

On fentanyl, making sure our borders are stronger. Look, nobody thinks illegal immigration is appropriate.

[Ryan Grim]

Oh, interesting.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Okay.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And people were like, oh, what about you in 2020? It's like the inauthentic. Bernie on immigration was the 2021 who went with the Democratic tide, which was produced by the Democratic outrage at kids in cages and child separation. And Stephen Miller.

[Ryan Grim]

Well, it was such an insane moment, too, because that was when, you know, this idea that Elizabeth Warren makes up a story about how Bernie was sexist to her, like eight years ago or whatever, that had actual currency. You know, it's like actual currency, not only in his campaign, but in the broader media environment. And I would say, at least with a limited portion of the Democratic base now, you know, those of people who watch this show always thought it was bullshit and that it was an invented smear, but, you know, let's not, you know, make it up like it was a scandal at that time in terms.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Of the going right in Iowa.

[Ryan Grim]

Same in particular, when we think about the campaign in 2020, was really just a meeting of forces that were really, in my opinion, just not Meant to coexist. Like, you come off this great awokening metoo. All of these other social, in my opinion, like, insane, like, periods, like literal temporary mass psychosis mirrored or sorry, paired with an original, like, economic populous campaign of 2016, which had nothing to do with any of that. If anything, is, like, diametrically opposed. I would say that the great failure of his 2020 campaign was the inability to reject a lot of that and to return to his roots, the America ad, and also just not being able to prosecute a case. This is his own personal failings, in my opinion. Where he's independent, he calls out the Democratic Party. But Joe Biden, I mean, if we'll all recall my great friend.

[Glenn Greenwald]

My great friend.

[Ryan Grim]

What's up with that? You know, it doesn't work that way. Or if it does, then you're actually just one of them, which is what I think a lot of people also feel. Also, one of the reasons why, you know, his campaign and his willingness there at the end, basically just endorse Biden for nothing. Remember what he said? He's like, joe, I understand that you also want to cancel or raise the $15 minimum wage. And he's like, yes, Bernie, I do. Didn't happen. Right. Sort of elsewhere. And then we didn't really hear much about it. You know, the entire. He was a good soldier for four years, which is a weird role to see him in. I think a lot of people felt betrayed by that.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Oh, yes, his image took a big hit on the left, but I think people are like, don't expect him to run for president again. So there's a little bit more grace. And also, there's nothing else to cheer for. And so I think AOC is stepping into that as well. Like, she. He also has taken huge hits from the left for years.

[Ryan Grim]

Yes.

[Glenn Greenwald]

But there's nothing else out there. And so a lot of people are like, all right, well, she's saying the things again.

[Ryan Grim]

Right. But why should you have trust now?

[Sagar Enjeti]

Right.

[Ryan Grim]

Cause she said it before, and then she ran for the oversight thing, and she was a good soldier. She endorsed Biden. She even defended Biden after. She was more vociferous in defense of Biden than Nancy Pelosi.

[Glenn Greenwald]

I don't think you're gonna get a world where people blindly trust either.

[Ryan Grim]

Right.

[Glenn Greenwald]

But I think it's like, if you're involved, you know, you need a horse. There's nobody else riding. This is it.

[Ryan Grim]

Right. All right. Well, yeah, as I always say, you go to war with the troops that you have these Are the troops. We've got Dave Weigel standing by. He's gonna break a lot of this down for us. He's got some great reporting on the subject. Let's get to it.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Hey, everyone. Welcome back to Bach yout Happy Hour. I'm Joe.

[Krystal Ball]

And I'm Serena.

[Sagar Enjeti]

And we are here with the iHeart Music Awards and David's Bridal, who are.

[Krystal Ball]

Sponsoring this podcast, and we are so grateful to them.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Thank you. Thank you for finishing my sentence. And we are here with our favorites, Dot and Charity.

[Ryan Grim]

Where were you in bikinis in the snow?

[Krystal Ball]

Montana.

[Ryan Grim]

Okay.

[Krystal Ball]

She flew out and joined you guys.

[Ryan Grim]

Isn't it cold?

[Krystal Ball]

No, it was.

[Ryan Grim]

We.

[Krystal Ball]

Well, yeah. Bikinis in the snow.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Wow.

[Krystal Ball]

They were sick, though.

[Sagar Enjeti]

I don't get bikinis in the snow.

[Ryan Grim]

Just like an aesthetic. Yeah.

[Sagar Enjeti]

I don't know if him and I did that. That if we did, like, speedos in the snow, you guys would be like, douchebags.

[Krystal Ball]

I would be like, let's see it.

[Ryan Grim]

I would not complain to do stuff like that. He's like, no.

[Krystal Ball]

That's gonna be the name of this podcast episode.

[Ryan Grim]

Bachelor Happy Hour. Speedos in the Snow.

[Sagar Enjeti]

David's Bridal. If you're listening, branding a little bit.

[Krystal Ball]

This is Ashley. I can any from the Ben and Ashley I Almost famous podcast. If you could lose 10.4 pounds in one month, would you try? Well, with Future Health, you can find out if weight loss meds are right for you in just 3 minutes at try fh.com that is try fh.com try fh.com results may vary based on start weight and adherence to diet, exercise and program goals. Database on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at provider's discretion. Does this. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week for happiness. Every night. You need Adam and Eve. Yes. I'm talking about sex toys. It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in, right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to AdamAndEve.com now and enter code IHEARTRA for 50% off. Almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. That's AdamAndEve.com, code IHEART for 50% off.

[Ryan Grim]

Joining us now is Dave Weigel. He's a fantastic national political reporter for semafor. Great friend of the Show. Good to see you, Dave.

[Dave Weigel]

Good to be here. Thank you.

[Ryan Grim]

So Dave, you wrote some really interesting stuff here about Tim Walsh. We just talked a lot about Bernie Sanders. But Tim Walsh is also holding town halls and meetings and he's been on somewhat of an apology tour, I guess you could say. Let's put it up there on the screen. Waltz on governing under Trump, not going to enable him. So what did you learn at this rally or in Wisconsin? Tim Walsh was there. It was an I told you so tour. It was an apology tour. What is his theory about where things went wrong and also how is he positioning himself vis a vis Bernie in aoc?

[Dave Weigel]

Well, he doesn't really have answers to what went wrong. That's part of it. It was this town hall style event. The questions were a little bit not coordinated but vetted before they were asked. The crowd was all Democrats. There were a couple of maga. I didn't see them. I had a friend from a Wisconsin paper who saw MAGA people trying to get in. They weren't allowed in. So it was asking what went wrong without bringing people in who voted against Democrats. Maybe not that effective. And the wall, general theory, a little bit of self serving, which is that he has a political style, a very blunt political style, sometimes goofy, often goofy that he thought would have was hemmed in by the Harris campaign. And the policy part of it is he just thinks Democrats didn't do enough when they had power to convince working class voters that they're on their side. That rhymes with Bernie's saying and that's irritating to lots of Democrats cuz they look at the Biden agenda and say we actually did. There's the faction of Democrats say we listened too much to the Warren staffers and the Bernie staffers and did as much as we could of your policy agenda. And the Teamsters went from endorsing us to unendorsing us even though we shoveled money at them to save their pension. So he didn't have answers, he just had a they should have listened to me more and they should be more populist. TBD for victory.

[Glenn Greenwald]

What is the kind of Bernie Warren wing response to that? Because it is the case that they pushed through basically whatever they could. Certainly on a Ron Klain. Bernie was calling Joe all the time and it was Joe Manchin slowing things down. Cinema slowing things down. What does the Bernie wing say to that?

[Dave Weigel]

It's mostly that part. It's that Cinema Manchin slowed this down and real populism hasn't been tried. We should be what if we were defending right now it expanded child tax credit? What if we were defending right now dental care as part of Medicare? That's kind of the burning answer because his speech is shorter than some of the speeches he gives. His policy agenda is not just, you should have elected me. It is implying we can build on some of what Biden did, but not saying. And Biden did some things right. The only times he mentions Biden, his criticism of the funding for Israel war machine, that's all he does.

[Ryan Grim]

Interesting.

[Dave Weigel]

And he brings up Biden, but it just says, yeah, and we need to keep building and doing more progressive things. But no mention of the Biden agenda.

[Ryan Grim]

Dave, how are you thinking about this moment? So I know you and I talked a little bit, and I was like, man, this Midas Touch thing, again, as somebody who does this for a living, I'm like, this is crazy. And I don't see a lot of elite media grappling with that. I think it's because not only the outside, but they're not like capital D, Democrats, as in, they're not like, yay, Schumer. They're like, no, actually, Schumer, screw you. How are the people in Washington, Tim Walsh and all those other people, are they picking up on that? I can see that with Bernie, with aoc, they're aware of this burgeoning online resistance, but I don't see the bubbles up here yet.

[Dave Weigel]

The difference between Democrats on their strategy is really fighting or building right now and fighting later. That's basically it. And that's another harmony between Walls and Sanders and frankly, people showing up. Because what we're was interesting in these crowds, the Walz crowd was all people who voted for Harris and Walz. The Bernie crowd, Remember the first eight people I talked to in Greeley, which is the University of Northern Colorado, probably the most conservative district he campaigned in over the weekend. The first eight people had not voted for him in any of the primaries. And I was kind of. I wouldn't say I was looking for people who might not have, but I was saying, oh, you're a woman in your 60s. You probably. You have resistance gear. You probably weren't a huge Bernie fan. And they weren't. They liked aoc, but they said just, Democrats aren't doing enough to fight. Where are they? Why are they not stopping this? Why can't they stop this? Why can't they filibuster? That was the question I had for Walz. You dealt with this. You got elected in 2006, and people were furious that you didn't cut off funding for the Iraq war. And he had an answer, but the answer there was, yeah, just take the L and win the 2008 election and fund the war in the meantime. And that's just not satisfying Democrats. They look at Trump and say, not only is he rude, does he offend our values, but he wins a lot of what he wants. He's not trying to do anything like repeal Obamacare. Wouldn't win that right now, but he wins. And they want someone who wins. And that's the difference. It's not how have you scored your Medicare for All plan is like, are you convincing me that at the end of the day you actually scored a hit on Trump in some way? Yeah.

[Glenn Greenwald]

And so you are seeing a lot of these people then that are into that funny category that I started seeing emerge right after AOC won, who were like, normie Democrats who are like, I don't like Bernie, but I do like aoc, which is the reverse of some people on the left who are like, I like Bernie, but I don't like aoc. And in both cases, like, they pretty much are saying the exact same things, more or less. Some emphasis varies here or there. So are those people now who are like, I don't like Bernie, but I like aoc, they kind of like Bernie a little more because he's maybe less of a threat and he's not gonna probably run for president. And could you imagine these like, centrist, ish, whatever you wanna call it, resistance Democrats really getting behind AOC as the. As a party leader type figure?

[Dave Weigel]

Oh, as a party leader. So some of that, yeah.

[Glenn Greenwald]

How do they see her?

[Dave Weigel]

As a Senate candidate? Sure. But I started to ask some people at the Greeley and the Denver rallies, and I always feel, I feel a little bit, you know, it's part of the job. I feel weird asking normal people about presidential elections three years in advance, but okay, it'll be in the conversation. Lead this ra. People say she running for something. And I was struck the same people I was finding who had strange new respect for Bernie or aoc, they were already worried that she was not electable nationwide. Like, oh, she's not white guy, and maybe that won't work. And she said some left wing things, maybe that won't. They really were snake bit by the Harris experience. And that's a bit ironic that Kamala Harris, who the ungenerous version of what she did in 2020 is endorse a lot of left wing ideas that she couldn't commit to or believe in. And they haunted her for six years. That was the worry they already had about aoc. But as a leader in the party, yes, they were cheering for their own senator. She was shouting out every senator who voted against the cr, for example, and they liked that. She was saying there are Democrats doing the right thing. We were talking about a handful of Democrats who are not doing the right thing and a hundred percent majority of Republicans doing the wrong thing need to get rid of the content of her speech. There was. I'm a working class person who Republicans make fun of because I'm working class and I know these policies work and we need to get Republicans who are bad for them. So there was nothing she said that was even testing, like, are you with me on this? Are you willing to go and endorse this policy? I ran on 2018, even when they talked about green jobs, it was a green jobs program. They did not mention the word green New Deal. And she already was. I'm not trying to say it's cynical, but she already was not mentioning the sort of bingo card jargon that made a lot of sense to people in 2019. Like you didn't say Medicare for all. You didn't say Green. She wasn't doing that. She was saying, here is a. Almost here's an inspiring populist Democratic agenda. Take it if you want it. And I'm here to give speeches about it. Cuz I can get crowds. That was what the offer was interesting.

[Ryan Grim]

Let's compare that to Chuck Schumer and his theory of resistance. Let's take a listen, we'll get your reaction.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Our plan, which we're united on, is to make Donald Trump the quickest lame duck in modern history by showing how bad his policies are. He represents the oligarchs, as I said, he's hurting average people in every way. And we are, through oversight hearings, we're exposing what he's doing through the courts, which I mentioned we've had some real success in, through legislation and through organizing in all the districts throughout the country. So that I believe that when. Because the Republicans are already nervous, you.

[Dave Weigel]

Know, a lot of them said don't.

[Ryan Grim]

Hold town hall meetings.

[Sagar Enjeti]

I believe by 2026, the Republicans in the House and Senate will feel like they're rats on a sinking ship because we have so gone after Trump and all the horrible things he's doing. And they will know it, see it, hate it.

[Ryan Grim]

So Dave, that's like the process theory of resistance. That's not working for a lot of these voters.

[Dave Weigel]

No. And he answers the questions that are asked and he doesn't pivot because the interviewer might say, but tell us what you're doing to fix this problem in the party. But there's not the Democratic agenda there. And that is when Schumer was on the rise and Schumer and Rahm were in this kind of same train going together in 2004, 2005. They led with policy. They said, well, the Iraq war's unpopular, that's taking care of itself. But we need to come up with some sort of agenda that we can run on everywhere. In the Ohio river Valley, in 6 for 6 for 6, 6 for 6.

[Ryan Grim]

It's a deep cut valley.

[Dave Weigel]

Oh, yeah, I thought I had deep cuts, but that's a good one in the Shuba view of things. Yeah, you do this, you make them unpopular. They come back and say, are you. If you're ready to come back to Democrats, here's our offer. And the progressive populist version is they already assume that Trump's bad. There's all these voters who, less than before, but who assume this thing is not gonna go well. They want him to break up the system. They'll be ready once the system's broken up for something else. We need to tell them right now. Cuz they look at Democrats and don't take it seriously. And that was the other part of what Sanders was saying more in interviews. He said this to Times, said to me that he's, he's just trying to find more candidates to run for office. And Denver, he said, AOC is an inspiration. People can do what she did, find their friends, run as maybe independents, not independents. Running as a spoiler and electing a Republican independence, saying the Dan Osborne model in Nebraska, although it didn't work, the Sanders model, which does work. There might be people who just think the party is so toxic that you need to run outside of it. And that is not fixing the party's problems with Trump. That is saying we need to replace the Republicans with whatever chess piece is available. It can be your Democrat, can be an independent. The whole Trump bad thing. All right, people know that we're not getting anywhere with that argument. Finally, I'll say, though I've talked a lot, is that half of these speeches are about things Trump is doing, but they're focused on. He is firing FTC commissioners, he is firing federal workers to enrich his friends and his donors. It's much more coherent than. He'll become unpopular later.

[Ryan Grim]

Yes, very smart. Now, the last question here is exactly about that. I Don't remember specifically at this time in the Tea Party did they have announced candidates? How soon should we start to look for those primary races which became such an important part of the narrative?

[Dave Weigel]

No, very good question. Because I think candidate filing in these Virginia races this year, that's wrapping up without much of a challenge. The internal party, it'll be later this summer. We'll see some of that. Even with Sanders and afc, I wasn't seeing much of a tumult for we need to primary a lot of Democrats because they're just a look at the CR vote in the House and the Senate. Is there somebody going to primary?

[Ryan Grim]

Brian?

[Dave Weigel]

Shots over there, right?

[Ryan Grim]

Exactly.

[Dave Weigel]

They're not giving them a lot of material to do that. Westworth, the Tea Party at this point had people, all these Republicans on the record for tarp. Right. There was something you could easily go out and tell people they screwed you in tarp.

[Ryan Grim]

Such a good point. I didn't think about that. In terms of litmus test.

[Dave Weigel]

Yeah, there's not the same litmus test for their candidates, but I'd say later in the year and the challenge of getting the progressives through the primary process, Justice Democrats are still trying to do that. These groups are still trying to do that, but they really are trying to win an argument first so that even the moderate candidate is gonna end up like, look, there's all these people who are not on TV every day but voted with Maxine Waters on everything this year. And that's more of the thinking, how do we have a coherent popular agenda that is rooted in Elon Musk is trying to rob you that somebody can run it in a plus four Trump seat. We're not necessarily gonna say you didn't sign our petition. We want to win that argument so that every time every Republicans are being asked, they're being asked if they support DOGE in a negative way. Everywhere they go, they assume the Democrats gonna tax the rich and give us benefits. So, yeah, long answer to your question. I would say in a few months. But Justice Democrats recruitment was starting much earlier a couple cycles ago. Right now they're looking at the field and saying also, what is crypto? What is AIPAC going to do and try to undermine us? We need a robust theory for these candidates before the money comes in and makes them unelectable.

[Ryan Grim]

Yeah. Smart.

[Dave Weigel]

Yeah.

[Ryan Grim]

All right, Dave, thank you so much for joining us, man. We appreciate it.

[Krystal Ball]

Ever wake up feeling lousy knowing something is off with your body? You don't have time for guesswork. You need viome. Forget all the generic health fads. Viome doesn't tell you what you want to hear. Tells you what's actually going on inside inside your body. By analyzing your gut microbiome, viome delivers a custom health plan that's as unique as your DNA. It's science, not nonsense. Want energy? What better digestion? Viome has your back. Stop trusting amateurs. Go to viome.com for a personalized gut professional. Now call Star Star gut to get $50 off a full body intelligence test. That's Starstar488 to receive a link to the offer. Does this podcast make you happy? Of course it does. That's why you're here. But it only comes out once a week. For happiness. Every night. You need Adam and Eve. Yes. I'm talking about sex toys. It's cool. It's cool. You have earbuds in right? Adam and Eve, America's most trusted source for adult products, has been making people very happy for over 50 years with thousands of toys for both men and women. Just go to AdamandEve.com now and enter code IHEART for 50% off almost any one item, plus free discreet shipping. Shipping. That's AdamandEve.com code IHEART for 50 off.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Now you can get Disney plus and.

[Krystal Ball]

Hulu together for just 2.99amonth for four months.

[Sagar Enjeti]

We sure would love that.

[Glenn Greenwald]

Get both and watch Marvel's Daredevil, Born.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Again and Moana 2 on Disney Plus.

[Ryan Grim]

Can I get a Chihu on Hulu?

[Krystal Ball]

Check out Good American Family and Paradise. Call it in now.

[Sagar Enjeti]

Disney plus and Hulu together for just 2.99amonth. All of these and more streaming soon.

[Krystal Ball]

New and returning subscribers 18 + only after four months. Plan auto renews at 10.99amonth until canceled offer ends. 3, 30, 25 terms apparently.