
Loading summary
Jenny Garth
This is an iHeart podcast.
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC nightly news, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home. Closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response. The best reporters in our business know how to listen. And when you listen, you get the truth. For NBC News, NBC News, I'm Tom Galamas. That's what we do every night.
Sagar Enjeti
NBC Nightly News with Tom yamas. Evenings on NBC.
Jenny Garth
This is Jenny Garth from I Do Part Two. Can't afford Ozempic? Try WeGovy from Future Health. Just $199 and FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just results. Visit futurehealth.com that's future without the E. And start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at provider discretion.
Sagar Enjeti
Bubba Wallace here from 2311 Racing.
Tom Yamas
Funny thing about being fast.
Sagar Enjeti
You end up waiting a lot.
Steve Bannon
First to show up, first in line, then just waiting.
Sagar Enjeti
Me, I rev up.
Tom Yamas
Jumbo casino with over 200 social casino games.
Sagar Enjeti
No slow lanes here. Why sit around when you can spin? I'm already racing. Your turn. Play for free@jumbacasino.com let's Jumba.
Tom Yamas
Sponsored by Chumba Casino.
Sagar Enjeti
No purchase necessary. VGW Group. Voidware prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply. Hey guys, Sagar and Krystal here.
Krystal Ball
Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show.
Sagar Enjeti
This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else.
Krystal Ball
So if that is something that's important to you, Please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today and you'll get access to our full shows unedited ad free and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.
Sagar Enjeti
We need your help to build the future of independent news media and we hope to see you@breakingpoints.com Good morning everybody. Happy Tuesday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. A very consequential show. Possibly our last show before the outbreak of full blown US involvement. So what do we have?
Krystal Ball
But really, who the hell knows? Yeah, at this point we were both up late monitoring what the hell was going down. So many contradictory signals. It seemed very ominous what was developing. I would say it still seems very ominous. So we'll just take you through everything we know at this point. We'll also track some of the additional news from yesterday. The Israelis targeted Iranian state broadcasters. Shocking and extraordinary scenes playing out live on tv. We'll bring you that. Also, Israel's implemented a policy to block their own citizens. And apparently there was a heated, heated conversation between our own ambassador trying to block US Citizens from fleeing that country that is, of course, now under attack. We've got a bunch of Tucker and Steve Bannon clips to show you their take on what's going on here as Trump spent some portion of yesterday also sniping at Tucker, jabbing him with the most Trumpian of insults. You don't even have a TV show anymore. Was like, really hit him where it hurts.
Sagar Enjeti
Burns, the man who went on podcasts. Okay. Interesting.
Krystal Ball
Indeed. So, anyway, interesting to see what the conversation is unfolding there. Glenn Greenwald is going to join us. He's going to talk about the role of media disinformation, both right now so that you can help parse through all of this flood of information that is coming at you. And also drawing out some of the parallels with how the media was weaponized in the buildup to the Iraq war. So that's gonna be a really important conversation. There are other things happening in the world, though. We have some really wild updates out of Minnesota after those attempted assassination of two lawmakers. One of them, you know, actually killed and murdered by this maniac who apparently went to the doors of two other lawmakers as well. Anyway, I'll save all the details for that story, but really crazy details that we're learning now. We also, California attorney general reached out to us and said, hey, I want to come on the show and talk about this lawsuit we filed against the Trump administration with regard to federalizing the National Guard. Extremely timely conversation because there are hearings with regard to that lawsuit in court today. So looking forward to speaking with him as well. And probably going to get to the AMA live. There's a little bit of scheduling question mark. So if not today, we may kick it to the Counterpoints crew tomorrow. Anyway, so we will see. But Sagar, we wanted to really make sure to thank everybody who's been supporting the show because it really has been quite extraordinary over the past several weeks.
Sagar Enjeti
That's right. Yesterday was one of our biggest days ever in terms of the history of breaking points, which is very, you know, I mean, it's very gratifying in terms of both the amount of work we put in, but really the Entire team. So thank you to everybody who's been supporting us. You can do so@breakingpoints.com, i mean, this is a special moment for the history of the show. Not even really in terms of our numbers, but I think in terms of being able to have a place where you can both get the news and viewpoints which are just not available in the mainstream as we hurdle towards another catastrophic war. So with that, Crystal, why don't we go ahead and get into it?
Krystal Ball
Yeah, so as I was saying, all kinds of things unfolding yesterday, and. Sorry, you can jump in if I forget any of the key details here, but we started to get reports specifically out of Israeli media that Trump was hours away from signing an executive order that would get us directly involved. Now, of course, we are already involved in Israel's war with Iran. It's our weapons. We are providing defensive support to Israel. There are indications as well that we may have been involved with the targeting. Trump was involved in the subterfuge leading up to this. So we are already involved, but the next step forward, we're backward. Dramatically backward, in my opinion, would be for us to get directly involved in the actual bombing of Iran. So. So these reports start to emerge in Israeli media specifically. Then we start to see all this information about all of these military assets being moved rapidly into the region. Then we get word that, number one, Trump is not going. He's in Canada at the G7 meetings. Number one, he's not gonna sign on to the joint statement that they're putting out calling for de escalation. He later backtracked on that, by the way, they changed in the language. He did sign on, but this was the indication we were getting. He wasn't gonna sign on to that. And he was gonna leave those meetings early, come back to D.C. and he wanted all of the relevant players to join him in the situation room at 2, 3am Whatever it was that he was getting back. So everyone's looking at this and going, holy shit, this looks really bad. All the indications are there that we are joining this thing directly and it's happening imminently. In addition, Trump puts out this truth. Let's put this up on the screen. This is A two. He says, Iran should have signed the deal. I told them to sign. What a shame and waste of human life. Simply stated, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I said it over and over again. Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran. Tehran, of course, being the largest city in Iran, home to some 10 million people. Directly in the city, 16 million. If you talk about the surrounding areas just, you know, absolute insanity here and seems like a direct threat coming. As I said at the time when we had these reports and he's leaving the G7 early and he's going to the situation room. Sagar. And so we were all, you know, just calling everyone we could get any information from, glued to our screens, doom scrolling trying to figure out what the hell was going to happen.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah, I spent a lot of last night on the phone and basically here's what I could gather is that we are in the most critical period of the next 48 hours. The situation room meeting in the White House is narrowed down to basically two separate options. A lot of what I've heard has now been backed up by the New York Times. The situation room meeting. There are two separate options now effectively before the President. One is to drop these bunker busting bombs, these 30,000 pound munitions from American B2s. One of the reasons why this necessitates only in pure US offensive involvement is that these munitions are so large is that they can only be carried by the B2 platform. So it must be dropped by the United States of America. Part of the reason why U.S. central Command requested so many of those assets, much of these is not only the carrier strike group which is now left in the Indo Pacific and heading on its way to the Middle east, but a lot of it is actually carrier refueling tanks that are being spread all across from the United States and heading over to the Middle East. So what would it would require is just to explain the military operation is it's not a single bunker busting bomb in the Fordo facility because it's so deep underground. This munition was developed in 2004 by George W. Bush specifically to go after both Iran and North Korean facilities which are underground. It requires dropping a 30,000 pound bomb and then multiple drops over and over and over again, effectively making a hole, then dropping a bomb, another one in the hole, over and over. This would be one of the most, honestly one of the most shocking bombing missions which will be captured on camera since Hiroshima. People are really not even really prepared for what it will look like. We have tested munition that was, I think it was under Trump's first term. That's the one option on the table. The other option on the table is J.D. vance and Steve Wyckoff basically fly to the Middle east and meet directly face to face with Iranian officials. This was an option that was relatively on the table as of last night. However, the President is really pouring cold water all over this can we put A to B please? Up on the screen? President Trump says he has not reached out to Iran for peace talks in any way, shape or form. Trump calls dozens of reports suggesting otherwise, quote, highly fabricated fake news. Let's also go to the next one, please, because this is very, very important. These are comments aboard Air Force one roughly around 2:30am Eastern Time. Quote, Trump wants a real end to the nuclear problem with Iran. This morning it will find him in the White House situation room. Quote, I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire. This is in reaction to some comments by Emmanuel Macron. He said, quote, he wants a real end with Iran giving up entirely on nukes, effectively unconditional surrender from the Iranians on their nuclear program. The Israelis, quote, aren't slowing up their barrage on Iran. He predicted. You are going to find out over the next two days. You're going to find out. Nobody slowed up so far. Asked his thinking for calling for Tehran to evacuate, he says, I just want people to be safe. He says he needs to be present at the White House so that he can be well versed and not rely on phones to know what's happening, happening. And he said he quantitative undecided about sending Wyckoff or Vance to meet with Iran. Quote, I may, but it depends what happens when I get back. So we had a diplomatic option which is on the table. However, almost all US public communications at this point from Donald Trump saying, I'm not interested in a ceasefire, I haven't reached out to Iran, I'm not involved in direct talks with them, do not indicate that those are going to be successful. All of this could be a ruse. Keep that in mind. That's basically what The Trump administration's M.O. on all of this is, however, I mean, just from reading the tea leaves as to where they are, we could all be very pleasantly and shockingly surprised. But I am extremely not optimistic. The go or no go order will come in the next 48 hours. The assets are now mostly in place. We've got the carrier strike group on its way. We already have huge amounts of US military assets. But the real sign of what is to come, if it were to happen, are the movement of those refueling tankers. That is exactly what you would see in a offensive scenario. So things, I mean, this is as bad as it gets. This is March 2003. I mean, this is it. The go or the no go order is coming soon. And I think what's so shocking has been the span of less than a week. Let's really take A step back, the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, maybe she was lying. I don't think she was. In March, she said and signed that Iran is not anywhere close to a nuclear weapon. In fact, the latest intelligence estimate said it would take them nearly three years to build some sort of nuclear weapon. All of this is a crisis manufactured by Israel. And now Donald Trump effectively enforced this issue. What's also crazy, you know, I was almost thinking about this and it sounds insane to say the Iraq war was more legitimate than this one in that George W. Bush had a years long propaganda campaign against the American people. They faked the National Intelligence Estimate around WMD in Iraq. They made their case to the United nations by Colin Powell. It was all lies, don't get me wrong. Yeah, and they sought a bipartisan congressional authorization for the war in Iraq, you can say. And part of the reason Bush survived in 04 is Kerry voted for the war too, and so did Hillary. All the Democrats supported. I mean, the vast majority of the Democrats supported. The vast majority of the entire country supported it. This is a unilateral action by Trump and Israel, basically saying our own Western intelligence is bullshit. And so on top of that, the crisis right now, I mean, look, there's a lot of people are hyperventilating, et cetera. The consequences on this are immense. And I mean, we're gonna spend probably the entire show talking about this. But just to give people the immediate picture that we will have probably a go or no go order in the next 48 hours. I would love to see Steve Witkoff and JD Vance get on a plane to the Middle east and meet with the Iranians face to face. That would be a benefit, of course, but there's big questions about what can actually happen on the Iranian side as well. Their entire top military echelon is dead. They may be in a, like the Germans or the Japanese being asked for unconditional surrender, seeing regime change and saying, screw it, we're gonna fight it out to the end, to the death. You know, I mean, this is not an uncommon situation for people who are forced into that. I hope they don't choose that course, but it's very possible.
Krystal Ball
As Trump was bragging about, some of the negotiators, some of the top negotiators he's working with were also assassinated, which is very intentional on the part of Israel. And you know, a playbook that they've used time and time again, you know, to Sagra's point about how just at the end of March, so Just a few months ago, Tulsi Gabbard was testifying that no, Iran is nowhere close to a nuclear we're not trying to pursue one. It would take three years if they did begin to try to pursue one. Trump was asked about that on Air Force One last night and he said, I don't care what she said. Yeah, I think they were very close to having them. Don't care about the assessment of his own intelligence agencies. He'll just take Bibi's word for it, apparently. And so here's the logic that the Israelis will be pushing and the many hawks within this administration will be pushing as well, okay? Now that we, they have not come anywhere close yet to destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities, nor can they without our assistance, but they have increased the likelihood and the logic of Iran actually now rushing to develop a nuclear weapon because even people who were previously moderate are going to look at the state affairs and say, we were fools to trust the U.S. they were lying to us. They were using these diplomatic negotiations as a ruse to create, you know, a distraction while Israel comes in and attacks and assassinates some of our top political military leadership. So we have no other choice at this point in order to have some sort of deterrent effect, in order for this government to have a shot at surviving now, we do need to rush forward and develop nuclear weapons. Something that again, our own intelligence community said they were not doing previously. So Israel will say, you know, and they're not wrong about this, now Iran will rush to develop a bomb unless you come in United States of America and basically rescue our asses and not only destroy their nuclear capabilities. Cuz I think it's also really important to keep in mind that in a lot of, I mean, that is just basically a pretext to enable this long desired war against Iran that Israel has been pushing for, for years and years. Bibi Netanyahu, specifically, many of the bipartisan foreign policy blob here in the United States as well. So the nuclear capabilities are in a lot of ways a pretext. But in any case, that's what they will be selling to Trump. And there are a lot of indications here that he may well be receptive to that logic. Certainly the idea that. So what was floated in the press that he's objecting to was this idea that they're going to put forward. The Trump administration is going to put forward sort of one final deal offer on the table. And he' swho knows because he's now admitted to lying to us and lying to the Iranians and lying to the whole world about his intent to move forward with the diplomatic negotiations. So who knows what he's really thinking? You certainly can't take his word for literally anything. You also can't take these news reports at face value either, because they're perfectly willing to leak lies in order to shape the information space as well. So that's why it's so difficult to discern what is going on here. But he's pushing back on the idea that he has any interest in offering any sort of a deal. And even if there was some, hey, we're going to put one final deal on the table. The content of that deal matters a lot because if it contains, if it's effectively the quote, unquote Libya option, then that is a poison pill directly pushed again by the Israelis and other neocons in this administration to try to guarantee that it is something that the Iranians could never, ever accept.
Jenny Garth
This is Jenny Garth from I do part two. Can't afford Ozempic? Try WeGovy from FutureHealth just $199 an FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just results. Visit futureh health.com that's future without the E. And start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC Nightly News, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response. The best for reporters in our business. Know how to listen and when you listen, you get the truth. For NBC News NBC News, I'm Tom Yamas. That's what we do every night.
Sagar Enjeti
NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas. Evenings on NBC. Did you know that parents rank financial.
Jenny Garth
Literacy as the number one most difficult.
Krystal Ball
Life skill to teach?
Jenny Garth
Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can send money to.
Sagar Enjeti
Kids quickly, set up chores, automate allowance.
Jenny Garth
And keep an eye on what your kids are spending. With real time notifications, kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely. And parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money.
Sagar Enjeti
With guardrails in place. Try Greenlight Risk free today@greenlight.com iheart let.
Krystal Ball
Me go ahead and put a to D up on the screen. This speaks again to what Trump has been saying about the possibility of you know, a ceasefire or some sort of diplomatic solution. He says publicity seeking President Emmanuel Macron of France mistakenly said that I left the G7 summit in Canada to go back to D.C. to work on a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Wrong. He has no idea why I'm now on my way to Washington. But it certainly has nothing to do with the ceasefire. Much bigger than that. Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong. Stay tuned now, Sager. My brain is a little addled at this point, but correct me if I'm wrong. Earlier yesterday, Trump said he wanted to see Iran and Israel get to a ceasefire. So, you know, this is just all over the place in terms of what he's saying and I think intentionally so. Real quick here, we could put a 4 up on the screen. After Trump said everyone needs to evacuate to Iran. You can see miles and miles of cars backed up. By the way, there's huge fuel shortages. Apparently there's no gas at the gas stations in this area at this point. And so people are trying to flee. But this is a city again of 10 million people. I mean, it's a larger metro area than New York City. To give you a sense of the size and scope. Just imagine for a moment that Iran told us New York residents, you have to evacuate and the, you know, waste of human lives. I mean, just this direct threat. And it's much more horrifying coming from us because Iran doesn't really have the capability to back that up, but we do. So Michael Tracy called it, I think, the most irresponsible statement that has ever been made in the history of the presidency. And it's hard to think of what could compete with it.
Sagar Enjeti
I mean, I don't know if I'd have to think about that one, but it'll rank up there just because of the glibness of the fact that it is not one where we're in a declared war. This is not Tokyo in 1945. We're not engaged in an existential battle to the death. This is a war of choice and a war of preemption more than anything. But look, it's not only insane to just say everyone should evacuate Tehran, but it's also buying into this Israeli framework about the existentialism of Iran. At the end of the day, look, existential is a word that has meaning. I'm speaking directly to Bill Ackman and to many of the other neocons here. Existential means life or death. Okay? Iran, even with their shoddy ballistic missiles and cruise missiles and all of that, it's a regional. So is it existential to Israel? I mean, we could debate that. I could make a case for it. Is it existential to Saudi Arabia? Yeah, you could debate that and you could make a case for it. Is it existential to New York City? No. There's actually one nuclear power or quote, rogue nuclear power capable of reaching the mainland United States that's called North Korea. That's actually an existential threat. And that's why the North Korean regime lives to fight another day because they've developed that capability. Even if Iran had a nuclear weapon, it would not be an existential threat to the United States in any way, shape, shape or form that implies the ability literally to hit the US Homeland with a nuclear weapon. And yet the Bibi, Netanyahu and Trump now framework is that this is literally an existential threat, enough so that it requires the full force of this is.
Jenny Garth
Jenny Garth from I do part two. Can't afford Ozempic? Try WeGovy from Future Health. Just $199, an FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just results. Visit futurehealth.com that's future without the E. And start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC nightly news, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response.
Unknown
Response.
Tom Yamas
The best reporters in our business know how to listen. And when you listen, you get the truth. For NBC News NBC News, I'm Tom Yamas. That's what we do every night.
Sagar Enjeti
NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas. Evenings on NBC.
Unknown
You're great at protecting your own personal information. You probably even use things like two factor authentication, strong passwords and a vpn. But as much as you try to be in control of how your information is protected, there are lots of places that also have it and they might not be as careful as you are. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second for identity threats. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan. If you lose money Due to identity theft, you might not be able to control how others handle your personal information, but you can help protect it with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code iheart or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40%.
Sagar Enjeti
Off terms apply the United States military. And here's BB. I mean, this is straight out of 02, straight out of O3. America first should not mean America dead first it's Tel Aviv, now it's New York according to him. Let's take a listen.
Tom Yamas
So are you going to target the Supreme Leader?
Unknown
Look, we're doing what we need to do. I'm not going to get into the details, but we've targeted their top nuclear scientists. It's basically Hitler's nuclear team. You know, we got them. We still have work to do on other sites. We have targeted their ballistic missile manufacturing facilities. Understand this. You see these bombs? You saw a single bomb, a one ton bomb, John, dropping on Tel Aviv and other places, causing killing men, women and children. They're deliberately targeting our population. We're not. We're not doing that. We're targeting their military sites, their nuclear sites, their ballistic missile sites so they don't have 20,000 of these that no country could survive with. What I'm saying is that we're not merely protecting ourselves, we're protecting everybody. We're protecting our Arab neighbors with whom we want to expand the peace as we did under President Trump's leadership in the Abraham Accords. That will be possible if Iran is defanged. We're also protecting the world. They have ballistic missiles that can now reach deep into Europe and soon could reach the United States. And imagine what this regime that caused death to America every time, that bombed your American embassies, that murdered 241 Marines in Beirut, that killed and injured thousands of American servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan, that tried to blow up a restaurant in Washington that burns the American flag. You want these people to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to your cities. Today it's Tel Aviv, tomorrow it's New York. Look, I understand America first. I don't understand America dead. That's what these people want.
Sagar Enjeti
America dead. Nobody in America is going to die because of Iran. It's just preposterous. But that's. Look, this is straight out of 2002. We don't want the smoking gun to be mushroom cloud. You might as well put Condoleezza Rice's face right all over this. And now he's also giving Away the game. Because it's not just about the nuclear weapons program. Look, this is obvious from day one. This is a regime decapitation operation with a nuclear sideshow. The nuclear aspect is just a pretext, basically, to incite regime change. But they're really giving it away here. I mean, basically talking about making the Middle east great again. Bibi gave an interview yesterday to Iranian opposition here. He says if the US Helps Israel assassinate the Ayatollah, it will, quote, help end the conflict. Let's take a listen.
Tom Yamas
Officials tell us that the President flatly rejected a plan, an opportunity that you. That the Israelis had to take out the Supreme Leader. Do you understand his concern? My understanding is his concern that this would escalate the conflict beyond where it is already.
Unknown
It's not going to escalate the conflict. It's going to end the conflict. Imagine what will happen if they had nuclear weapons and the ICBMs, the Intercontinental Ballistic missiles to deliver it to every place on Earth. We're preventing the most terrific war imaginable, and we're bringing peace to the Middle East. And I believe that after our action, we're going to be able to bring the Middle east to new heights that nobody even imagined. You know, make. Make the Middle east great again. Make it truly great.
Sagar Enjeti
Make the Middle east great again. I mean, look, it's insane. It's preposterous. It's the same thing. I mean, it's literally 1953 all over again. We've got the shah's son here. He knows everything about Iran. We'll put him in power. He got Israeli government ministers putting out photos with the shah son. I wish I was making this shit up. It's insane. I mean, 2003. I realize this is probably a massive segment of our audience that doesn't really remember a lot of the details of the war in Iraq. But the war in Iraq had their own, you know, Shah. His name was Ahmed Chalabi, and he was a guy rolling around here in Washington, and he was friends. And he convinced Bush and a lot of other neocons here in D.C. that he was representative of the real Iraqi people. The reason you guys have never heard of him is because about six months into the war, they're like, yeah, this ain't gonna work. And you know who they ended up elected? People who ended up igniting a massive civil war in their country which killed, you know, thousands of American soldiers, millions of Iraqi citizens, and to this day, it remains basically an Iranian outpost. Ironically, if you really think about it. So. So altogether Everything that is old is new again. And the rhetoric is exactly the same. But what's so dismaying is that people are not looking and learning the lessons of all of those. And it's just so dismaying to me because the downside risk of all of this is so immense. Look, I'm not gonna sit here and say World War iii, but at this point, I genuinely think the best case scenario for this is Libya. How did that work out? Yeah, I mean, look at Benghazi. Look at those cities. I mean, they collapsed into disaster. Look at the Syrian civil war. How many millions of people were affected and hundreds of thousands are dead. Look at the fallout. Look at the American intervention we end up backing aside. There's civil. And then this is a country, 90 million people, almost one third the size of the United States. They have sizable ethnic minority populations. They have chemical and biological weapons stocks likely stashed in different places. Easily could come under control of this or that. And then next thing you know, what's gonna happen. The same thing. We had US Troops in Libya doing special operations raids, fighting isis. We had to bomb Syria. I mean, everybody. We still have troops in Syria to this day. And that happened in 2014. It will be a disaster, and it will have ramifications for years to come, keep us embroiled in the Middle East. I mean, in the nightmare scenario, it's not World War Three. I don't think Russia and China and all of that were gonna happen. But the nightmare scenario to me is hundreds of thousands of American troops who have to secure US Interests in the Straits of Hormuz or to protect, you know, protect this asset or protect that. It doesn't happen, you know, all at once. Remember Vietnam? Oh, just a few advisors. That's it. That and then it scales up and up and up. We went into Afghanistan with the promise that we would be putting out the Taliban. Then we would be out. We went into Iraq. Donald Rumsfeld's plan to go into Iraq is we would knock the regime over. We would replace. It would be out within two years. They literally called it a cakewalk on national television. We were there for over a decade. And so we are watching this all play out in the same way. The people, the civilians are gonna suffer that a lot of American service members are gonna suffer too.
Krystal Ball
And everything that Bibi says is like the polar opposite of the truth. The idea that this aggressive, illegal war of choice would protect Americans is insane. To Sager's point. It would put Americans at risk. It would immediately put at risk the Americans the thousands of Americans who are already serving in the region. So it would. And think of the catastrophic blowback and fallout from our misadventures in Iraq that spurred more terrorism that, you know, they talk about Iran as like the number one sponsor of terror in the world. Like the amount of terrorism that we fomented through our disastrous decision to go into Iraq is unbelievable. So you talk about Libya. Okay, let's imagine they get their wish and they turn Iran into a failed state in the way that Libya is. Libya is a population of 7 million people.
Sagar Enjeti
Exactly.
Krystal Ball
Syria is a population of about 24 million people. Iran is 90 million people. You think having a failed state of 90 million people is going to make the Middle east great again? Like insanity, psychopathic insanity. The amount of human misery that we would watch unfold. I mean, it's just, you can't, you can't wrap your head around it. And so everything that Bibi says is the polar opposite of reality and flies in the face of all of the lessons that we should have learned over these many years of misadventure in the Middle east and not even just the recent history that we've been around and cognizant for. I mean, the reason we have this Iranian government to start with is because US interventions in the Middle East. So, you know, the fact that we're back to the well and even contemplating this, and look, maybe he's going to decide at the last minute, you know, what, we're going to take the diplomatic option if that's. Even if the space for that is even still open, because there's no doubt the space has been narrowed by the fact that they admitted and bragged about lying to the Iranians about their interest in a diplomatic resolution. Not to mention the fact that the previous deal that the Iranians had agreed to under the Obama administration had immediately been, you know, pulled back and we got out of it under the first Trump administration. So it's not like we have a lot of credibility. But maybe they decide to pursue that last ditch diplomatic effort. Maybe there's enough space remaining for the Iranians to come to some sort of a deal with the US but the fact that this is even being contemplated is so outrageous and unconscionable.
Sagar Enjeti
Oh yeah. I mean, we could get into that in the immediate term. I'm like you, I just hope that there is at least some off ramp. But I gotta tell you, I don't see it. I don't see. I really, really hope that I am wrong. But I have not spoken really with any Person who is actually very optimistic about that possibility. Let's see.
Krystal Ball
The Israelis yesterday started putting out threats against Iranian journalists and specifically the Iranian state broadcasters. And then let's go to a 11, guys. We can put these just horrifying and extraordinary images up on the screen while this woman is broadcasting live. You can see her here talking. They attack the building that she's in. And shortly thereafter, actually, incredibly, she and her colleague there come, come back on air and are able to, you know, talk presumably about what unfolded. But I mean, this is the sort of thing, soccer that's just like normalized. I mean, the number of journalists that they murdered in Gaza with scarcely a word, by the way, outside of Trey Yingst of Fox News from Western media about the targeting, targeted assassinations of journalists inside of Gaza. And now you have this. You know, they announced that they were going to attack this broadcaster. They did it while they're live on air. And again, silence from any sort of, you know, the Western media supposedly care so much about journalism. Let's put a 12 up on the screen so you can see what I'm talking about here. In terms of the threat, they say, will the Iranian regime's television stations be attacked soon? Defense Minister Katz, the mouthpiece of Iranian propaganda and incitement, is on its way to disappearing. So they don't even feel the need to like, pretend that this was an accident or they were going after military targets. They're just happy to announce it directly, blatant war crime, and put the next piece up on the screen afterwards. They confirmed, they said the same Defense Minister says the Iranian regime's Propaganda Incitement Broadcasting Authority was attacked by the idf. So just out and out admitting it was them. After this all unfolded, the Iranians decided that they would go ahead and then threaten. Threatened some of the Israeli propaganda channels. We could put this up on the screen, channel 12 and channel 13. Or it says, evacuate the headquarters of channel 12 and 14. Sorry, Israeli channels 12 and 14 immediately. This was Iran in Arabic account on platform X issuing this warning message. As far as I know, nothing happened at those stations. But just unbelievable, the impunity that the Israelis act with at this point. I mean, there's just no, like, previous norm or law of war that they respect whatsoever. They've detonated car bombs in Tehran, brag about that as well. The pager attack, you know, which maimed and killed innocent people who happened to be nearby. You know, people were going about there, they were at the market or whatever when these things blew up. There was all sorts of collateral Damage. And they, you know, they bragged about that. They're super proud of it. They killed a bunch of the assassinations that they were able to accomplish here in this war that they started to begin with, with those things. They were assassinated, like, in their beds at their homes, which means that their wives, their children, their neighbors were also killed. The civilian death toll is at some 90% is the estimate right now. And so there's just no limit because they've been allowed to act with such impunity and with zero accountability from the world.
Sagar Enjeti
Right. And, you know, okay, you could. The justification is, oh, it's state broadcasting. It's part of the propaganda. And it's like, well, okay, anybody who has ever studied regime change, operation or coup, you know, in Africa, this is one of those classic things. What is the first thing that the rebels always want to do? You seize state broadcasting. And the ability of the regime to be able to get its message out there. So even, let's just say purely on strategic grounds, what does this indicate? This ain't about no nuclear weapons program. This is about.
Krystal Ball
Yeah, you think that lady was like a nuclear scientist.
Sagar Enjeti
This ain't about nuclear weapons. This is about regime change. This is about degrading the ability to get the message out. This is about reducing their state capacity to trying to foment chaos. There's also. There's so much Israeli COPE online about how these Iranians are just, you know, screaming out for freedom and for lack of repression. I'm not gonna doubt that there are a lot of Iranians who are upset with the regime. But, you know, even today, I was looking. Well, some of the most prominent Iranian activists against the regime are like you, Donald Trump and Bibi. Not only, you know, killing civilians, whatever, and causing chaos in Tehran, but. But this whole evacuate Tehran order is one of the most unhuman things that we've ever seen in terms of chaos, in terms. Just think about if somebody told you you need to. That message was posted 2:30am Tehran time. Similarly, we have what the inevitable. We were told repeatedly, Israel will finish the job on its own. We're not asking anything from the United States. Then slowly, it was, okay, well, we just need you to defend us. We'll keep going offensively. And now here we have Yoav Gallant. He's the former minister of defense for Bibi Netanyahu, presided over much of the Gaza war. Goes on cnn. Of course, these guys never know how to do an interview with their own television networks. And what does he say? He says, America has an obligation to actually enter the war offensively and to take out Iran. Let's take a listen.
Unknown
I believe that the United States of America and the President of the United States have an obligation to make sure that the region is going to a positive way and that the world is free from Iran that possess nuclear weapon in the middle of the richest place in oil and gas in the world. This could be a disaster for the world. And I believe that the determination of the American president that have been shown recently will pave the way to America to enter into this very important operation. The President of the United States have the option to change the Middle east and influence the world. And influence the world, not only the war. In order to do something that will create a better future for all of.
Sagar Enjeti
Us, America has an obligation. So there you have it. I mean, these people are shameless. They will say that they're doing it all themselves. And now they've basically spent the last five days just begging for U.S. involvement. And in a sense, as you said, they actually created the crisis which would necessitate US Intervention. Because if the Iranians are like, screw it, okay, let's sprint to the bomb, Then what? There's only one force in the world that can take them out. They went into the operation knowing from day one they would never be able to destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities. They could degrade it. That's not the same thing. And at this point, also, if the US Position is basically zero, nuclear weapons, again, it's very difficult to square if you're the Iranians. And this is where you need strategic empathy. I'm not in any way sympathetic or whatever to the Iranian regime. I'm gonna try and put myself in their shoes. If you have the entire higher echelon of military command assassinated, if you negotiated and thought they were serious and then they bombed, they used that as cover to bomb you, why would you, like, what would you do? And in a sense, too, from this point forward, as we learned with Libya, if you give up your nukes, they may still take you out a decade from now. So why would you do it? Right? You would not do it. I would say sprint to a nuke and let's fight to the death. I mean, look, it's grim, don't get me wrong. But, you know, this is where also people talk about the ideology. And, well, there's ideology baked into that as well, right? And be like, look, this is a final face off between us and the evil west, and so be it. You know, millions will die. Look at the Hitler in bunker theory or the way that the Japanese high command is willing to sacrifice their own civilians. And by the way, you didn't see mass rise up against them. Because the uncomfortable and truth is that unconditional surrender set the conditions in which the people accepted their own death trap. And they themselves said, okay, this is it, we will join the regime, even though we hate them on these various things, to fight them. I'm not saying that's necessarily going to happen, but it's very, very, very possible. That's the biggest problem with all.
Krystal Ball
I mean, Sridhar Parsi says that there has been a real rally around the flag effect in Iran.
Sagar Enjeti
If somebody bombs you, what are you gonna do? Of course if somebody bombed us, I'd.
Krystal Ball
Be like, okay, threatens all know, however many million people in New York City, like, of course you're going to think of the. For those of you who are old enough to remember the patriotic fervor after 9, 11, right? I mean the country really did, you know, the number of people who signed up for the military and bought into the propaganda about why we have to go into Iraq, I mean it was off the charts. And so yes, of course there's going to be a rally around the flag effect as you have the Israelis bombing them and the US threatening them and involved in the bombing. And so you are actually forging a much more cohesive nation and much more support for a government that by all accounts was pretty unpopular at this point. And in terms of the logic with regard to nukes, they have to be thinking like shit, we shouldn't have ever negotiated with Obama. We should have just gone for it. We should have just gone ahead because we wouldn't feel so comfortable messing with them now and the Israelis would not feel so comfortable messing with them now. Those. That is the logic that our foreign policy has created. And it was entirely predictable. And in fact, I know the Israelis understood this going in that counter to their narrative that their attacks and their degrading of Iranian nuclear facilities and also, you know, decapitated, like going after military and political leadership and their attacks now on oil and energy infrastructure and all the rest. Far from limiting their nuclear capacity or degrading the calculus or the desire to rush towards a nuclear weapon, they knew going in that the logic would be, all right, well now we have to go after a nuke. And that's exactly why they did it, because they knew that they had to block this diplomacy that was ongoing before it actually succeeded. And this is their big chance to create a dynamic where they have leverage with us to try to Pressure us into this war. And it looks very grim in terms of Trump buying into that logic and getting played and going along with them. And that is not to, by the way, take away his agency. Because nothing drives me more crazy than all of this. Cope about like, oh, he's being misled by the neocons. No, he's a big boy. It's very clearly him making these decisions, and he is the reason why we are in the position that we are in right now.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah. And if you want the blackest of all pills, let's go ahead and put a 10 up there on the screen. Quote, this is a latest poll just came out yesterday from Gray House. By the way, we don't know a ton about this, but this is the only polling that we really have, this organization. Do you support the US Support attacking Iran? If necessary. Now, I think if necessary is important. But this is amongst Trump 20, 24 votes. Yes. 72%. No. 19%.
Krystal Ball
Yeah. No. It'll be overwhelming from the Republican base. It will be overwhelming, overwhelming support. It will be.
Sagar Enjeti
I question whether there will be some Democrats too, because this is one where I think that the Democratic base will be against it. Yeah, but there's no Democratic leadership against the war right now. In a way, their silence is nothing. Their silence speaks volumes.
Krystal Ball
They've been pathetic. I mean, they're more. Listen, I thought the thing that happened with Alex Padilla was bad. Going to fricking war with Iran is way worse. And they. There were so much more exercise over him being wrestled to the ground after he tried to ask a question of Kristi Noem at a press conference. Again, that was bad. Potential World War III is worse. Okay. Vastly worse. And the silence is absolutely deafening. I do want one little glimmer of positivity here. You have some bipartisan effort to put forward a war powers resolution to say basically like, hey, you can't do this. You can't enter a war with Iran without getting the backing of Congress. And so you had Tim Kaine in the Senate along with. Here's the full list. This is as of 10:30pm last night. You have Tim Kaine, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Merkley, Chris Van Hollen, Ed Markey, Tammy Baldwin, and Tina Smith. So all Democrats. Only in the Senate. Senate. In the House, you do have Thomas Massie, the lone Republican who has signed on for a similar war powers resolution along with Ro Khanna, Rashida Tlaib, AOC that's all we got so far. So pretty slim pickings. There are a handful of Democrats. Tim Kaine was pretty early to come out and say this is unacceptable. Bernie Sanders has been probably the most vocal AOC signing on. But you're absolutely right that, that it's so like, it's so enraging that you have this moment when the President is contemplating dragging us in to this horrifying war at great cost and risk to our people, to regional stability, to civilians and human life in and around Iran. And there is just very little opposition being mounted from the supposed opposition party in the. It is utterly pathetic.
Sagar Enjeti
Look, and I'm gonna say something unpopular, but I think it's just basically true at this point. Maga, they're gonna support Trump no matter what. If he supported a deal, they would say, look, he's the greatest genius of all time. If he goes to war, they'll be like, oh, they had it coming. And Trump, look, Trump is the preeminent. He is the force. It's the only thing that matters. There is no policy behind it. I made my peace with that long ago. And for many people talking about the MAGA base wants this or that is all honestly bullshit. Okay, like, look, we've had 10 years now at this point. But, but, and this is where maybe this is very elitist of me. This is why I almost think it doesn't matter. This isn't about popular will, this is alt. At the end of the day, foreign policy is the most elite of elite concerns. It very rarely ranks in the highest of the priorities unless a war actually starts. Let's look at the past. The vast majority of the American people supported Iraq. They said later that they didn't, but they did. That's why though this is an intra elite war over foreign policy theory basically to affect the White House. And unfortunately that's actually where Israel has the highest strategic advantage because so much of Washington is basically influenced by Israel and, or they have, you know, the ideology. It's not even just money. It's really, it's about like affinity, like the ability. You know, they have all these free Pratt junkets over there. People spend time over there, they get to know them. There's this great influence campaign and a soft and a hard block that's been going on for, I don't know, 80 years now basically since its existence. So you have that.
Krystal Ball
And there's an ideological belief that Israel is an important strategic interest for us.
Sagar Enjeti
In the United States. So you have that, right? That pervades Washington. So all of this, what's happening right now, I actually don't think it has anything to do with Maga I really don't. This is not really a Democratic question, small D. This is really a question at the foreign policy elite level, especially because Trump is such a cult of personality that his people will back him no matter what. That's part of this whole, like, oh, the MAGA base. And all of that will fracture. I think all of those arguments are specious, really, the way that we should argue about this. Is this a good idea or a bad idea? That's it. That's purely all that matters, especially when we know that we have this group of voters which will go with him no matter what. This does, though. And we'll talk about this in the Tucker segment. Put a lot of the people who have an audience who are almost solely, basically comprised of MAGA in a very, very tough position, because a lot of them actually do have genuine, genuine beliefs and or principles or philosophies about the way things should be done. And then when they go against and are counter to Donald Trump, you're gonna find yourself in a very, very difficult position. This is the difficulty and the conundrum of anybody who is complete, like, really totally tied to Donald Trump as an identity. And it's part of why when you do have a differing opinion, you, at the end of the day, will always lose. You will lose to Trump and you will lose to the MAGA base, which is really, really unfortunate. Now, there are alternative power centers here, and this is again, the lesson from the war in Iraq. Barbara Jordan and the people who voted against the war In Iraq in 03 were villains. They called them treason. They wanted to throw them in jail. They were vindicated in a span of just three years. So if you believe what you believe, stand up and say it now. You could be wrong. Listen, the Shah's son could be in power. The Israelis could be totally successful. I'll eat it. I'd be happy. Honestly, I would be happy, happy if this all ended up well, because it would mean no Americans are dead and the Iranian people are happy. I just don't think it's gonna happen. I think I have a lot of evidence to back that up. I don't think they have very much evidence on their side to be able to say that. And so when the time comes and the bill can come due, eventually things will come around. And so America, look, I think they will support this war. Unfortunately, I'm just telling the truth. Most people don't spend their days reading books or they don't know anything about Libya or Syria. They're like, yeah, something happened there or Whatever. But you know, at the end you'll come to find that it was a big mistake in the long run.
Krystal Ball
Last thing. And then we can move on to this bit about the Israelis blocking their own citizens from leaving the country and trying to block our citizens from leaving their country as well. This was actually one of the pieces that was very ominous yesterday. Put a 3 up on the screen and we'll talk more about Tucker in the Tucker block. But Trump yesterday, we had covered, had said that he was not sniping at Tucker and was like, listen, I say what America first is. And unfortunately he's right about that. And so he went more aggressively at Tucker yesterday evening, said somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And like that. I mean the number of MAGA people like Laura Loomer that I've been seeing attacking Tucker, you know, because Trump says, okay, he's in the out group now, that's it. And Tucker has barely even like, hasn't really actually even criticized Trump. Trump, he's just been mostly doing the whole like there's these forces inside the administration that are trying to convince Trump, blah, blah, blah. But the fact that Trump felt the need to effectively excise him from the coalition I think was also very troubling.
Sagar Enjeti
We'll see where things go. But yeah, I mean that is a great lesson in terms of how the relationship with Donald Trump works.
Krystal Ball
And yeah, Tucker was sitting there next to him at the rnc. They were the best buddies not very long ago.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah, that's how it works. Look, a relationship only runs one way.
Jenny Garth
This is Jenny Garth from I do part two. Can't afford Ozempic. Try WeGovy from Future Health. Just $199 and FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just results. Visit futurehealth.com that's future without the E. And start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC nightly news, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home, closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response. The best reporters in all our business know how to listen. And when you listen, you get the truth. For NBC News, NBC News, I'm Tom Yamas. That's what we do every night.
Sagar Enjeti
NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas evenings on NBC.
Unknown
You're a hustler. You get things done, but you don't always do things for yourself. With JLO Beauty, it takes just a few minutes a day to look like facials are a regular part of your routine. JLo Beauty's Fresh and Flawless skincare kit includes six skincare products that work as hard as you do. They'll hustle to brighten, firm and hydrate your complexion morning and night. This skincare kit is a one and done solution that is clinically proven to visibly tighten and lift for instant and long lasting results. Cleanse, treat, moisturize, protect. The fresh and flawless Skincare Kit does it all. See why the kit's a best seller today? Visit jlobeauty.com deluxe and get an extra 25% off your first shipment plus free gifts with code Deluxe. If you're not satisfied, return the bottles within 60 days for your money back. See the website for details. That's jlobeauty.com Deluxe to get that JLO glow.
Sagar Enjeti
At the same time within Israel there is an extraordinary development. Let's go and put this up there on the screen. There's a new report here from a new policy, which is an American lobbying organization for US Policy towards the Middle east, actually advancing national interests. Here's what they say sources tell us at a meeting yesterday between U.S. ambassador Mike Huckabee and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu devolved into a shouting match over Netanyahu's objections to US Plans to evacuate citizens from Israel and the wider region. U.S. officials believe that the Netanyahu objection was predicated on his desire to hold US Citizens at risk in order to increase the likelihood of US Entry into Israel's conflict, conflict with Iran. So let's sit on that for a little bit, shall we? First of all, there are 700,000Americans, is the current belief within Israel, 700,000. I believe they have the largest outside American citizen population than Mexico, which tells you quite a bit. However, there is a little bit of a difference is that many of these people are dual citizens according to the data that we have. But it also is being used as a pretext for why the United States has such a, quote, obligation to defend Israel. Now, let's just say Mexico. All right, so if Mexico, who do they share a border with? Guatemala? So if Guatemala was bombing Mexico, would we intervene to protect Americans in Mexico? Yeah, I don't think so. I don't think that that logic works all that well. There's a secondary element to this which is that Currently, at least a lot of these US Citizens don't seem to be allowed to leave. You know, we haven't seen yet some of the reports there, and obviously the flight situation there is pretty crazy. But almost every one of the other great powers has told their citizens to evacuate immediately. Yesterday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued a statement said all Chinese citizens should leave Israel immediately. The Russian Foreign Ministry came out and said all Russian citizens should leave immediately. There's actually a huge Russian population in Israel. A lot of people don't know that, but the point is, is that those countries seem to be have the ability to tell their citizens to leave. Right now, I believe we do have travel advisories and all of that, but the question is about their ability to do so. And this pairs. And this is already confirmed. This isn't even based on a report. Put this up there on the screen from Haaretz, which is an Israeli news organization. Israel tells airlines do not let Israeli citizens leave even once repatriation flights are able to continue. Quote, estimates suggest rescue flights are Israeli at least stranded abroad won't begin before Thursday. And even then, only two flights per hour will be allowed during daylight. And the plan does not match the scale of the crisis. So, I mean, effectively what you're seeing is that they are locking their people basically in their borders in the same way that Ukraine tried to do so in order to force everybody to fight in the draft. And they're afraid, I guess, of the, you know, the number of Israelis that do have dual citizenship all around the world who could take advantage of that and say, I'm getting the hell out of here. I don't want to fight. Fight in this war or, you know, hide in a bomb shelter every other day raises some profound questions about human shields. And locking people basically in a death trap and forcing them of their own defeat. I'm not going to deny there's probably a lot of Israelis. I would say the vast majority of Israelis probably support this war based on all the polling that we've seen.
Krystal Ball
Agreed.
Sagar Enjeti
Let's be honest. But at least some of them want to leave. And I think that the action by the Israeli government speaks to volumes.
Krystal Ball
Yeah, they don't want. So first of all, to go back to US Citizens. Yeah, that's a big Being blocked from leaving. We don't know if they were able to actually, you know, like convince Huckabee and the US Administration of that policy. But what they're saying here, they want to use American citizens as human shields, like that is what that means. And they want to use American citizens as pawns in their game, to try to force an escalation and force us to come in on their side. I guarantee you they are praying for the Iranians to hit some US military base and to kill some American service members so that the war fever picks up here in the US and this administration feels even more pressure, is even more likely to directly join the fight on Israel's behalf. That's how sick they are. Like, that's what they're cheering for. Which is why you shouldn't put like some false flag fake attack past them either, because they've done such things in the past. So I mean this is not to be conspiratorial. This is to be a student of history and understand their logic and what they are capable of. You can't put anything past these people at this point. So their stated policy goal, their desire that they're arguing with are completely psycho. By the way, U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Agabia believes in all this end times nonsense. Their stated policy objective is to, to trap American citizens in Israel, to use them as human shields to try to foment and escalate a further, even larger scale war. That's where we are. And with regard to their own citizens, I think Saver is exactly right. Number one, they don't want images of thousands or tens of thousands of Israelis fleeing the country. They don't want that. They also, I think are concerned because this is a country that, you know, was really overstretched militarily. You've got the Gaza genocide occupation, you have a siege that was implemented in the west bank and increasingly aggressive actions there. You've had bombing campaigns in numerous regional neighbors and you have a reserve corps that's been called up again and again and again. So they're worried also just like a tactical level of losing additional amount of their manpower of people who flee overseas and don't wanna be part of this, who may support the war broadly, but may not exactly wanna be the ones who are fighting it. So that's the calculation they're engaged in, which is pretty grotesque.
Sagar Enjeti
I mean, look, it's like I said, it speaks volumes. They don't want their own citizens to leave, but at the same time, again, let's not say that the vast majority of the people don't support this war and at least the political establishment does. Let's put this up there on the screen. This is from the Times of Israel. But the opposition has actually rallied around the Iran campaign, quote, despite long opposing PM's leadership. Yair Lapid the primary opposition leader, says Netanyahu must go, but not during the existential fight. Right.
Krystal Ball
That's part of why this is happening right now.
Sagar Enjeti
And Naftali Bennett, the former prime minister, says there is no left, no opposition and no coalition when it comes to preventing Iranian nuclear missiles.
Krystal Ball
All so fucking fake. Like just outta nowhere. They just make up Iran's about to have nukes. They haven't offered any evidence of this. Our own intelligence community says that is not the case. They aren't pursuing nukes. That it would take three years. We've been hearing for decades now that Iran is days away, weeks away, months away, whatever. I mean, even Bibi himself isn't saying they're like weeks away from an Iranian nuke. So this is all about a political calculation by Bibi Netanyahu that, number one, he does not want the diplomatic negotiations that the Trump administration was engaged in to succeed. Number two, he is still on very tenuous political footing himself. And so this is a way to, you know, in the same way there's a rally around the flag effect in Iran, there's a rally around the flag effect in Israel that you can see here is evidenced by the opposition basically saying, like, this is our guy for as long as this war continues. Well, guess what? That incentive is war continuing forever. So that's why this is happening right now. It has nothing to do with any Iranian activities regarding developing a nuke. That is the pretext. And the goal here very clearly is to collapse this government and foment either a failed state or some sort of direct regime change. That is the true aim of what they're doing. And so do not believe all this. Like, don't get caught up in all this nonsense Trump tweeting out, oh, Iran cannot have a nuke. Okay, then keep going with your negotiations, which had a genuine shot at success until you lied about them to trick the Iranians and help to close the possibility of any sort of a diplomatic solution.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah, I mean, and especially what we're looking at right now from Donald Trump. I mean, what we see is just not only a backing of the campaign, but what you're also watching are just accepting a lot of these implicit assumptions like that this is a war of necessity, that the Israeli intelligence is somehow better than our intelligence. I don't believe that. I mean, look, Tulsi Gabbard signed it and testified before Congress under oath. If she lied, go ahead and tell us. Show us the proof. Right, this is what I mean about Iraq. They actually did try. I mean, they made up all of this bullshit about Yellow Cake and Curveball and Niger, I mean, I can tell you the whole story.
Krystal Ball
Long propaganda.
Sagar Enjeti
It took a while. Build up Colin Powell and you know, there's no question that they're on their path to a wmd. I was actually going back and reading the exact TikTok of all of it. In a way it's impressive, the amount of BS that they were able to make sound legitimate. They don't even try this time. It's all out here in the open. They're just like, no. Our intelligence assessment. I don't agree with her. That's what Trump said today. And in terms of the Israeli society and government, it's pretty clear they're united around this. Put B4 up here. On the screen we have Naftali Bennett, the former Prime Minister. What a peculiar country, Israel. When Iranian missiles rain down on us, 200,000 are scrambling to come home. Not away from danger, but towards it. I love my nation of lions. It'd be interesting to see what that number would be if they did actually.
Krystal Ball
Allow outbound flights by Israeli citizens running away from danger. You're not letting them.
Sagar Enjeti
It's like, well, you won't let them, will you?
Krystal Ball
I did say, I don't know if this is confirmed or not, but apparently some Israelis are taking like yachts to Cyprus.
Sagar Enjeti
Really?
Krystal Ball
To. Yeah, to get around the air. Ban, one last thing and then we can move on to this Tucker and Steve Bannon conversation, which is interesting. We've got a number of pieces of it to share with you, but did you follow Tulsi put out that like weird ass nuclear video last week. Yeah, and it was very ominous. And she's talking about like the nuclear attacks, you know, are dropping the bombs in World War II and all the carnage from that. And so sounding this very ominous warning. And at the time, first of all, I was like, what is this? And then also it felt like it was more. And maybe it was in the context of Ukraine, Russia and the possibility of a nuclear conflagration there, but I don't know. Now with the outbreak of us joining this war with Iran, I don't know if it was more about that. I'm not sure, but it was interesting to me. Now, looking back in retrospect, I'm like, she's trying to send a message, some sort of a plea for help. I don't know.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah, look at this, look, we're not there yet. But for Tulsi, this is the person who staked her in time. And look, she's Compromised, I think many things that she said in the past, but I don't think she has compromised herself on Iran and really on Iraq war. Right. Which is the central reason according to her, just when we spoke to her as to why she wanted to get into politics. It's like if they do launch a war, you have to resign if you have any integrity whatsoever. I mean, but I don't think it'll happen. But I think she should. There are a few other people in the administration. RFK Jr. Is one of them as well. This is a person who, look, he may be very, very pro Israel, but he has spoken repeatedly about the war in Iraq with the disastrous neoconservative intervention. I mean, it's a separate question entirely. If it involves fully bombing and it's something by his admission he said was some of the most disastrous choices in US History, it's like, okay then, same thing, you need to resign. There are a lot of people, people in the administration who have literally forged their way to Donald Trump and to working in their positions right now because of their opposition to forever wars and other things. And so look, if somebody's going to do such an about face, then you kind of do have at least some. There's an integrity question here when it comes to that. And if they don't, I mean, they're gonna be scarred for all time. Oh yeah, look, we'll see in terms of how, how this works.
Krystal Ball
But I think Tulsi is the one that really comes top of mind to like. Yeah, yeah.
Sagar Enjeti
Because she's just.
Krystal Ball
Her whole thing is against the war mongers, the forever wars. That's our whole thing.
Sagar Enjeti
Right.
Krystal Ball
And so if you. And you have Trump throwing you under, directly under the bus now, quite literally, I don't care what she said.
Sagar Enjeti
Humiliated you in front of the eyes of the world. I mean, if you think about it, you know, the odni, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, supposed to be the boss of the entire US intelligence community. So if she goes abroad and she's meeting with, let's say, our five eyes people and said this is the US intelligence assessment, they're gonna be like, why should we believe you? Donald Trump says he doesn't even trust you. That's right. He kicked your legs out from under you completely and neutered. I mean, it's honestly embarrassing. It's humiliating. I quote, I don't care what she said. Right. I mean, this is one where it really is just, it's astounding and it is sad.
Jenny Garth
This is Jenny Garth from I do part two. Can't afford Ozempic? Try WeGovy from Future House Health. Just $199 and FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just results. Visit futurehealth.com that's future without the E. And start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health. Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at provider's discretion.
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC nightly news, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great, great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response. The best reporters in our business know how to listen. And when you listen, you get the truth. For NBC News NBC News, I'm Tom Yamas. That's what we do every night.
Sagar Enjeti
NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas evenings on NBC.
Unknown
What I put into my body on a day to day basis matters to me. I took a food allergy test and discovered I was sensitive to certain ingredients, including what was in my protein powder. Then I found organ. It was a game changer for my health. Organ is an excellent source of complete protein, 21 grams and has all nine essential amino acids. It's an easy way for me to incorporate clean nutrition into my diet. Plus, organ has less than 1 gram of sugar per serving and is made without soy which is also one of the ingredients I avoid in my diet. With organ, I don't have to compromise on taste for good clean nutrition. My post workout shakes now include both organs organic plant protein powder for muscle support and recovery and their collagen peptides to help support my joints, skin, hair and nails shop now available@orgain.com and selected retailers.
Sagar Enjeti
Let's get to the Tucker segment because it's important here as well. You know this. It gives you some preview into the elements of the people in quote, MAGA or MAGA leaders who are trying to push back and some of the futility which that has and perhaps though could preview, you know, some brands in the coalition or at the very least at a leadership political level. So we'll see how this works. But Tucker Carlson actually flew to Washington yesterday, something that he rarely does specifically just to sit down with Steve Bannon live in the studio and basically to campaign against US Intervention in this war. Let's take a listen to what he and Steve Bannon had to say. The platform of Fox though it's just not marked.
Steve Bannon
Why is Fox like all weekend?
Sagar Enjeti
It's just cheerful. Literally. It's the same, it's exact. You can play side by side. Iraq in 2003.
Steve Bannon
Oh, I was there and here.
Sagar Enjeti
And what's happening today?
Steve Bannon
Why is it that. Why is this apparatus. Well, Levin's the funniest because he's terrible on tv. And again, I never had any problems with him at Fox. He kind of controls Hannity in this weird way. I never understood what that was about. I never really cared to learn. Sean was great to me, always nice, and so was Levin. So I just like, kind of stayed away away. But they didn't want to put him on TV because he's like screechy and he's just not a common president. Like, unless you're literally floating in and out of consciousness and the attendant has taken the remote to go have a cigarette, you're gonna flip the channel. When it gets on tv, it's like listening to your ex wife screaming about alimony payments. It's like not appealing. So they wouldn't put him on tv and then, you know, Sean pushed and they gave him some kind of weekend show that nobody to wants watch. Now I don't have a tv, but someone was just. Who owns a tv, was just telling me that he's like all over primetime. So what is that? That's not by popular acclaim. That's not like their viewer surveys. Like, you know, we need a lot more Mark Levin, less Jesse Waters, more Mark Levin. What they're doing is what they always do, which is just turning up the propaganda hose to full blast and just trying to, you know, knock elderly Fox viewers off their feet and make them submit.
Sagar Enjeti
This is, this is where the. I mean, look, that's as good as it gets in terms of calling out Fox News, at least. And I will tell you, I. Because Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was appearing live on Fox yesterday, I unfortunately was watching some just to make sure, you know, we weren't having an announcement of war. And by the way, Secretary of Defense was on for two minutes. Do you want to know the first question that they asked him about two minutes?
Krystal Ball
Well, I know the answer because you tweeted. You texted me.
Sagar Enjeti
It was about the military parade. Yeah, they were like, why don't you just tell us about how great that. I was like, are you kidding me? You're literally in the middle of a crisis and Jesse Waters is asking Hegset about the military parade.
Krystal Ball
Of course it was Jesse Waters.
Sagar Enjeti
I couldn't believe it. I mean, it's like, don't even pretend you have any news organization. Okay? But whatever, let's put that to the side. Tucker is correct. I mean, just yesterday, apparently, recently, Fox broadcast a report about secret Iranian nuclear sites that have recently been found. I mean, it's out of 03 all over again. But this is also why there is a generational divide on the issue. In fact, there was some polling that came out yesterday which showed that people who primarily got their news from cable are dramatically more pro Israel. People who got their news, and this includes right wingers, actually, people who got their news from the Internet and. Or podcasts or do a mix of both, are dramatically less trustful of a lot of mainstream institutions. But look, here's the truth. These are the people who vote. These are the people who really have the ear of some of the people involved. And with Trump, it's obvious that he respects television more than anything. So before we play even more Tucker stuff, it's actually important to say that even Tucker's mild criticism there. Did you guys hear what he said? He said, I love Trump. I think he's a deeply humane person. That is. This is as couched as it gets. I mean, can we. Let's be honest here, right? Yeah. Well, even that. Just the temerity to say something about Trump not needing to go to war with Iran. Here's what Trump had to say in response. Guys, let's go ahead and play C4.
Krystal Ball
They've been talking about this deal for six years, right?
Sagar Enjeti
Six years.
Krystal Ball
And he's done what they haven't been able to do.
Sagar Enjeti
So he's done really a very good job.
Krystal Ball
I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network.
Sagar Enjeti
And say it so that people listen.
Krystal Ball
Thank you.
Sagar Enjeti
Let him go get a television network. I mean, again, this is preposterous for a number of reasons. One, Trump actually stewed television for the podcast. There was the whole narrative about the podcast election, and he got millions and millions of views online. The Tucker Carlson show is probably far bigger than it ever was on Fox News in terms of the number of views. I mean, it's always number what number two to five on the top podcast in the entire United States, gets millions of views on YouTube. It's just empirically true that you've had far more. He's had far more reach. I don't know about influence, but reach in independent sphere. Something his White House has an alternative media seat for. So I don't know what that's all about. If he only cares about television. But the point is that in his head, Fox is all that matters. And what Tucker is calling out there is Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and the entire Fox primetime is just geared up for war, war, war. And the crazy thing is it's the same people. General Jack Keane, right, same guy on TV in 03, sorry, in 07 and pushing for the surge, is now here back on television pumping the war with Iran. He says it's a critical, a core national interest of the United States. These are dyed in the wool neocons. There's no getting around it whatsoever. And yet it's being mainlined into the boomer mind at every level. And look, this just is about Fox, cuz it's about the right wing, this is every network. I mean, it's insanity out there. It really is cnn. It's got IDF spokespeople fricking Scott Jennings from a bunker in Jerusalem telling Trump to finish the job. News Nation is somehow even more unhinged with Cuomo and Leland Vitter on the Iran question.
Krystal Ball
Oh, by the way, Scott Horton, taking Leland Vittor apart, if you want some enjoyable viewing. But I actually need to watch msnbc. I'm curious.
Sagar Enjeti
I think the fact that I have not yet seen a single clip tells me what I need to know, which is that they're, you know, just like the Democratic Party. They've got nothing. And you know, this is actually a big test for Chris Hayes. Some of us have been around long enough to know that Chris's origin story is about the war in Iraq too. So Chris, where are you, man? Like you've got a primetime network. Make yourself the central, you know, rally the base, do something.
Krystal Ball
We need a Keith.
Sagar Enjeti
We need our older, you know. You know, it didn't turn out so well for Keith, but at the time.
Krystal Ball
At the time it was important.
Sagar Enjeti
It was important at the time.
Krystal Ball
Did you see this comment from Mitch McConnell? What was it he was asked? Manu Raju asked him about Iran and Israel and he said, quote, what's happening here is some of the isolationist movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are distressed we may be helping the Israelis defeat the Iranians. I would say it's been kind of a bad week for the isolationists. So, you know, Mitch McConnell here taking a victory lap. Yes, but you know, ultimately, like you said, Tucker has broader reach but perhaps less influence. And unfortunately, I think that is the case. Unfortunately, cable news still has some purchase on our society in terms of like elite conversations. And to your point, when you're talking about foreign Policy.
Sagar Enjeti
It's an elite conversation.
Krystal Ball
The elite conversation really matters a lot. So, you know, and the vast majority of core MAGA voters, you had independents who voted for Trump, who I think will be disgusted with this decision and will say, this isn't what I voted for and will be unhappy and move away from him. I think his approval rating may go down as a result if he gets as directly involved in Iran. But I think his approval rating of the Republican Party will continue to be sky high. They will continue to do whatever mental gymnastics they need to do to say, this is totally different than Iraq and this is totally in line with what I wanted and what I voted for. And listen, in fairness, Trump on the campaign trail was talking about how Israel should bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. So the White House posted this long thread of all the times that Trump said Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And look, he did. Now, he also trotted out Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr to posture like they were going to be the pro peace ticket and that they were going to be against the warmongers and they were opposed to Liz Cheney, etc. But he also said the thing that some of us picked up on and paired with his first term record indicated that, no, he's not going to be some dove. He's not going to be committed to a completely different foreign policy orientation. He's not gonna be committed to extricating us from this region. He was the most pro Israel president we probably ever had in his first term.
Sagar Enjeti
So.
Krystal Ball
That'S what it is. And the MAGA base found a way to reconcile that at the time and they will continue to do so.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah, look, as you said, and I think it's very obvious MAGA and all of them will go along and the line will probably be the Libya I still believe to this day. I don't think Trump is dumb enough initially to commit to some full blown regime change operation which requires boots on the ground. I think it's gonna be a Libya style situation. And remember, Obama and Susan Rice were all saying, what about Libya? It was a tremendous success. We committed. Just a few American jets shot them down. And then the Libyan people rose up and they seized their destiny for themselves. And then our ambassador was literally dying and smoldering ruins. Oh, I don't know. Eight months later and ISIS took over Benghazi, turned into a slave market and a footpath and a boat path to Europe for one of the world's worst demographic crises in modern history. Oh, just, you know, only took a couple of years for that to work out. So that will be the line, is that no Americans died while doing it. And it's like, okay, no Americans died in the Syrian civil war. Do we think it was a disaster? I do. Yeah. You know, because guess what? French people died in the Bataklan when ISIS massacred all of them. And it was planned in Syria, actually. A lot of Americans were killed fighting ISIS in 2017 in Iraq, which was bled over from Syria. Same in Libya. Sure. Did a lot of Americans die as a result of Libya? No, not directly, except for the people in Benghazi. But let's also think about all of the weapons in the civil war and all of the fallout from that in the region, the chaos that it's really wrought on Europe. Just because, you know, the bar cannot be one person die, an American dies or not. That's not the issue that is at hand here. The issue is destabilize the regime. Does it cost the United States more blood, more treasure, more attention being paid to this region? And that's really what he has committed himself to within this. And it's gonna be a disaster. To this point here you have Tucker and Steve Bannon going off on this. Let's take a listen.
Steve Bannon
I actually really love Trump. He's a deeply humane, kind person. And I am saying this because I'm really afraid that my country is going to be further weakened by this. I think we're going to see the end of American empire. Obviously, other nations would like to see that. And this is a perfect way to scuttle the USS America on the shoals of Iran. But it's also going to end, I believe, Trump's presidency and effectively end it. And. And so that's why I'm saying.
Sagar Enjeti
What do you mean by that?
Unknown
That's.
Sagar Enjeti
That's coming from you.
Unknown
That's.
Steve Bannon
You get, look, I knew Bush. I knew George W. Bush. We had, you know, family connections to Bush. I knew Bush personally. I still see Bush sometimes. And, you know, of course, he. He hates me, and he does, because I criticized him on Iraq. And that war is the sum total from historical perspective of his administration. But I knew him, and he had all kinds of plans for the things that he wanted to do, but once domestically. Domestically, to improve the country.
Sagar Enjeti
Right.
Steve Bannon
And you may agree or disagree, but, like, in his mind, he wasn't just about the invasion of Iraq in March. Oh, no, no. He was going to redo Social Security, all types of. He was going to take care of the entitlements issue, and he really thought it was going to work.
Sagar Enjeti
Yep.
Steve Bannon
And you could laugh at that or whatever. But the point is, the second you get him mad in a real war, not a fake, let's go bomb the villagers and declare success. We don't even have a good track record. Like, why are the Houthis still. There's a whole other question, which is how prepared is the US military for a real conflict? And the answer is totally unprepared. Scary, unprepared. I don't think people understand that end.
Sagar Enjeti
Of the American empire. I mean, we talked about this with Dave yesterday, but I think it bears reiterating is, look, there's a reason this is it. When you get enmeshed in a war, it will kill your entire presidency. It becomes the singular issue. Everything else, it gets dragged down. I said yesterday, the evangelicals, a lot of them believe that Iraq is what killed their entire movement. I mean, like I said, I don't think it's 100% true, but there's probably some truth to it. If you believed in Social Security reform. I don't. But they believe it. That's what killed it. It was Iraq. It was Iraq and it was Hurricane Katrina. Those two things nuked the entire Bush project. They became enmeshed unit. The entire White House became an Iraq project. They never did a single piece of major domestic legislation ever again. That will similarly happen here, except Trump is somehow beating Bush on the timeline. It's only been six months into his presidency. This will define for the next three and a half years if things go poorly. I mean, they're really just banking on the ability to land the plane, but there's just no evidence of that. And what he points out is a bigger question as well. Even if Americans don't get deployed to hundreds of thousands or any of that, the spotlight and the attention that we'll have to have on the country of Iran as a result of this operation is years, decades to come. Think about Iran is not only a country of 90 million. Let's say the regime collapses and it goes Libya, civil war, Iraq, you'll have Qatar, Saudi, Turkey, Turkey, all these other people, they're all gonna pick sides. Israel, everyone's gonna pick there. They're all gonna fight each other. There'll be mass death. They have a direct footpath. They can walk to Europe literally by foot if they wanted to. So you're gonna have a mass demographic crisis in Europe. And then on top of that, all of these different sub regional issues surrounding it, like Syria and the Iraqi government, they themselves be destabilized because Iran was so enmeshed in their politics. And so then what happens if we have a civil war there and then the they bleed into each other. And all of this is when. That's exactly when the John McCain's and Lindsey Graham's of the world say we gotta go in and we gotta pick a side, just like we did with Syria, just like we did with Libya. And guess what? We're not very good at it. And all the while it requires more U.S. munitions, more carrier strike groups, more Israeli defense. And what's going on in East Asia? 50% of global GDP laughing at the United States of America. I mean already we've probably depleted an entire year's worth of of thaad interceptors in five days. Five days. I mean it would require the World War II level mobilization of the US economy to come back and to actually produce the level of munitions just to be able to support an offensive in an ongoing war against Iran. Forget about some other theater. It's not going to happen. This is not 2003 in the unipolar moment. And I didn't even talk about all of the underlying social decay and problems that we have here at home. So I think he's exactly right. I mean, I don't know if it'd be the end of the American empire, but it would be a step in the.
Krystal Ball
Not be a step in that direction anyway. Yeah, and I mean think of all the costs that just the Houthis in Yemen were able to exact.
Sagar Enjeti
Exactly.
Krystal Ball
Against us like with, you know, when they're relatively like minor operation which wasn't even really directed at us. And then think about, you know, the cost that a country like Iran could exact. You know, I'm personally would like like this administration to fail, but not at the cost of going to war in Iran. That is not a cost that it should be or is acceptable in any way. And I think your point about the escalation of our, the acceleration of our decline is incredibly apt. Let's go and play this last thought that we have from Tucker and Steve Bannon. This is C3 guys, where you can see how careful they are about avoiding any direct criticism of Trump. And I think this is a preview of the justifications to come that you already see. I saw Charlie Kirk last night on Fox News. I trust Trump and we have to trust in Trump and he was made for this moment and thank God we elected him to be here during this point in time. The rationalization that we've seen in the past from many of these figures is Anything Trump does that they don't like, it's never his fault. It's like the people around him, or he got tricked, he got pulled into something. The deep state, blah, blah, blah. And so Tucker and Bannon, in an effort to maintain, apparently failed effort to maintain some sort of. Of credibility and influence within the Trump administration, also concoct this elaborate imaginary scheme in which Trump is really dedicated to peace. And it's just all of these unseen forces around him that are effectuating the outcome that we all see. Let's take a listen to that.
Steve Bannon
And the incentives to pull the US in are so profound. I guess if I could just say one political thing. Watching Donald Trump, who, of course, you know very well, who I think at core is sincere about peace.
Sagar Enjeti
Oh, big time.
Steve Bannon
Yeah, big time. Big time. I mean, that's. That's real. Watching him done so wrong. The lies. Oh, he knew all along, you know, that the peace process was fake. Steve Witkoff was playing along. That is a lie. That's a lot. I know that's a lot. Those guys meant it. Bald face lie. It's a total lie. And, and all these people that, that Mark Levin and all of the minions who are running cover for a foreign government, they're all telling that same lie. And I just, I feel for President Trump and I think. I don't know this, I'm just guessing, but at this point, I feel like he just has to kind of roll with it, you know? What do you say? You don't want to get in an argument about that right in the middle of a war. No, I think he reiterated last night that we got to get back to the peace part. They got to lay down the guns about him. He sincerely, even now, he sincerely believes. Whether he's right or not, I can't say, but that this could be a predicate to a peace deal. What we're seeing now, he really thinks that and wants that.
Krystal Ball
So he's holding onto the idea. This was all. This is all an effort to get to a peace deal. I mean, if he thinks there's a.
Sagar Enjeti
Duality of Trump, I think both of those things can be true. I think when Trump is on the phone with Tucker and them, he probably is saying things like that. He's probably got hours of conversation with a lot of people, actually, I know this literally to be the case, talking about how he wants a deal with Iran. He's also a deeply impressionable boomer who watches a lot of Fox News. And when he has dinner with Mark Levin, he's like, yeah, Maybe it is a good idea to go ahead. And this is the problem with somebody who doesn't think that deeply about any of this. I mean, it also shows you really the downside of somebody who basically could promise all things to all people. But part of the clarifying part of the presidency is that you, you do actually make a decision. And when you make that decision, you actually come into power. You find out who, what somebody really thinks or who has really been swayed or not. Part of the reason they have to frame this stuff is this happened yesterday with Dave. I love Dave, and Dave doesn't care about this, but Dave actually was kind of a real figure in maga. Right. I would say in terms of his audience, people look to him for guidance and just his position. He had real anti help to solidify.
Krystal Ball
Libertarian voting for Trump.
Sagar Enjeti
Yeah. And that was really important. And so when he was on our show and he was like, impeach Trump and I'm done with Trump, I was like, oh, man. Because what I know is that for them, Trump is the ultimate question. Trump can never fail. It can only be failed. Now, that's a very convenient narrative for Donald J. Trump. It's obviously bullshit. And those of us who talk like Dave or who say these things like that's BS or you actually have agency, you get shut out real quickly. Like, I just am being honest in terms of the way that this all works for political influence. And that's part of why Bannon and Tucker, they both are doing shows and they're trying to give their opinion, but they're political actors as well, trying to push an actual agenda. And what you're all watching is how that works in practice and also how difficult and honestly humiliating it can be. I mean, especially Bannon's case, because Bannon, you know, is constantly like, he's, he'll hit them on Elon, he'll hit them on this and all. And then Trump will just be like, I don't agree with that at all. And he'll elevate them. And Bannon's like, I'm speaking for the MAGA base. And it's like, well, are you really? That's why that whole mantle of I'm speaking for the MAGA base or any of that, I think everyone needs to drop it. And we should just argue on the merits, on the merits. Let's just argue on the actual thing and say, look, this, this and this, we can talk about politics. I mean, you want me to give the real anti political case for Trump? I said it earlier in the Show Bush the reason he survived is cuz he got the whole country to agree with him and co opted the Democratic Party. If you do this, if Donald Trump does this, he will own the decision entirely. No Democrats gonna vote for this war. They're not stupid enough, you know, to. A lot of Republicans won't even necessarily vote because it won't come up for that. And he and his national security team will own it for all time. There's none of that protection for the political establishment or the media, even in the media to be honest. Cause they're not as, as complicit in this one. Like you can't spread the blame around. You are gonna own it 100%. That's about as a political reason as ever not to do the course that you're currently taking.
Krystal Ball
Yeah, well, and Tucker is a much more, I mean no disrespect to Dave, who I think you're right as an influential figure on the right was important in pulling together, you know, the Trump winning Trump coalition, bringing libertarians into the tent, et cetera. But Tucker is a much larger and more influential figure. And even with him being so careful, Trump still. Yeah, hit him, hit him multiple times and just completely brushes him aside. Kooky. Tucker Carlson thinks that it's fine for Iran to have nuclear weapons. And so our politics, this is the worst thing about the Trump era. It's all about Trump. He is the central dividing line. If you are how you feel about him and his every single decision and your willingness to go along with it no matter what it is, that defines where you are on the political spectrum. I mean, it's easy to forget now. Liz Cheney was a big Trump supporter. Yes, Liz Cheney campaigned with Trump, okay. In 2020. She was on the Trump train. And then the minute. It has nothing to do with her being a neocon or whatever. I know that's what they claim. It had nothing to do with that. She criticized Trump after January 6th. That was it. That was what killed. And same thing with all this antipathy towards Mitch McConnell who now is apparently riding high because he's getting his way in terms of foreign policy. Has nothing to do with him being corrupt or neocon or any of the rest. It had everything to do with again, he was critical of Donald Trump and you can't do that. And they will trash you and destroy you and the base will go along with whatever you say about who is on the good side and who is on the bad side. That, that's, that's the landscape as it exists now.
Jenny Garth
This is Jenny Garth from I do part two. Can't afford Ozempic? Try WeGovy from Future Health. Just $199 and FDA approved for weight loss. No insurance or tricky syringes needed, just result results. Visit futurehealth.com that's future without the E and start losing weight this week. Future Health weight loss data based on independent studies sponsored by Future Health Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Danielle Fishel
Hi, I'm Danielle Fishel from Pod Meets World. So for my two boys I got Samsung Galaxy Watch for kids. And I'm not saying I'm kind of jealous of my kids tech. I'm saying I am definitely jealous of my child's tech tech. This thing lets them call, text and explore all from their wrist. No smartphone required. And don't worry, you're still the boss. You control who they can talk to and yes, you can totally stalk their location in real time. Get Galaxy Watch 7 on T mobile now. Kid ready with a new paired line. Visit t mobile.com to order yours today. Parent and child must have a Samsung account and Google account with family link. Requires initial pairing with a compatible Samsung smartphone and qualifying wireless plan with LTE service activated. Please check with your carrier for more information. Trusted contact applies to compatible apps. It does not restrict communication through third party or other communication apps. Emergency services and contacts remain accessible. Location sharing is dependent on network connectivity and device being recently active. T Mobile terms via 24 monthly bill credits when you add a qualifying paired watch line. See additional offer terms on T mobile.com.
Krystal Ball
It'S summer time to enjoy long days, lazy nights and great food because Uber Eats has deals all summer long. So when hunger strikes, don't sweat it. Delicious deals are just a tap away on Uber Eats. Enjoy all your favorite grocery items delivered straight to you.
Sagar Enjeti
Get ice cream, soda and snacks from your favorite stores like Wegmans and cvs.
Krystal Ball
And make the most of every moment. Now that sounds like a good summer order. Now on Uber Eats.
Sagar Enjeti
Terms apply.
Krystal Ball
Product availability varies by region. See app for details.
Jenny Garth
This is an iHeart podcast.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar – Episode Released June 17, 2025
Episode Title: Trump Tells Tehran To Evacuate, Israel Bombs Iranian Media Live On Air, Israel Blocks Escape Of US Citizens, Trump Bashes Tucker
Hosts: Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti
Produced by: iHeartPodcasts
In this high-stakes episode of Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar, Hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti delve into a rapidly escalating geopolitical crisis involving the United States, Iran, and Israel. The episode examines President Donald Trump's aggressive stance towards Iran, Israel's audacious military actions against Iranian media outlets, and the concerning blockade of US citizens attempting to flee conflict zones in Israel. Additionally, the hosts analyze the internal political dynamics within the US, including Trump's contentious remarks about Tucker Carlson and the broader influence of neoconservative ideologies.
Krystal and Saagar open the discussion by addressing alarming reports suggesting that President Trump is on the verge of ordering a direct military intervention against Iran. They highlight Trump's recent statement urging the evacuation of Tehran, Iran's capital, which houses approximately 10 million people, as a precursor to potential devastating military action.
Notable Quote:
"Trump says, 'Iran should have signed the deal. I told them to sign. What a shame and waste of human life. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran.'"
[06:00] - Krystal Ball
The hosts express deep concern over the possibility of the US deploying massive bunker-busting bombs from American B2 bombers, a move reminiscent of the Hiroshima bombing, indicating an unprecedented level of military aggression.
Notable Quote:
"This would be one of the most, honestly, one of the most shocking bombing missions which will be captured on camera since Hiroshima."
[07:36] - Saagar Enjeti
The episode transitions to Israel's direct attacks on Iranian state broadcasters, actions that occurred live on air. Krystal emphasizes the blatant aggression and the normalization of such war crimes by Israeli forces.
Notable Quote:
"They just happy to announce it directly, blatant war crime, and put the next piece up on the screen afterwards."
[34:02] - Krystal Ball
These attacks are interpreted not merely as isolated military strikes but as strategic moves aimed at crippling Iran's propaganda machinery, thereby facilitating potential regime change.
A particularly distressing development discussed is Israel's implementation of policies to prevent US citizens from evacuating conflict zones. This strategy appears to be designed to pressure the United States into military intervention by keeping American lives at risk.
Notable Quote:
"They don’t want to like, pretend that this was an accident or they were going after military targets. They’re just happy to announce it directly, blatant war crime..."
[58:05] - Krystal Ball
The hosts draw parallels to Ukraine, noting that while other nations like China and Russia have successfully evacuated their citizens, Israel's approach starkly contrasts by restricting exits for both its own and allied citizens.
Krystal and Saagar explore the US political landscape, highlighting the overwhelming support within the Republican base for Trump's aggressive foreign policies, particularly among MAGA supporters. They critique the Democratic Party's muted response, attributing it to a broader influence of pro-Israel neoconservative ideologies within Washington.
Notable Quote:
"America first should not mean America dead first..."
[20:52] - Sagar Enjeti
The discussion underscores a growing polarization where foreign policy decisions are heavily influenced by elite circles, sidelining broader public opinion and bipartisan discourse.
A significant segment of the episode is dedicated to analyzing Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon's public opposition to US intervention in the Iran-Israel conflict. Despite their critical stance, Carlson and Bannon struggle to influence public opinion effectively, facing backlash from Trump's loyalist base.
Notable Quote:
"Steve Bannon: I actually really love Trump. He's a deeply humane, kind person... [He] sincerely believes this could be a predicate to a peace deal."
[80:26] – 87:55] - Steve Bannon & Krystal Ball
Krystal remarks on the futility of their efforts, noting that any deviation from Trump's line is swiftly dismissed, leaving true dissenters marginalized within the current political environment.
The hosts draw extensive parallels between the current situation and past US military interventions in the Middle East, notably the Iraq and Libya wars. They argue that, similar to these historical precedents, current actions are likely to lead to prolonged conflict, regional instability, and unintended long-term consequences without achieving the desired outcomes.
Notable Quote:
"We going to spend probably the entire show talking about this... This is as bad as it gets. This is March 2003."
[05:08] - Krystal Ball
Saagar further elaborates on the historical failures, emphasizing that US interventions have consistently resulted in greater chaos and loss rather than achieving strategic goals.
Krystal and Saagar express grave concerns over the humanitarian impact of potential US-Iran military conflict. They predict massive civilian casualties, infrastructure devastation, and a regional power vacuum that could exacerbate conflicts in neighboring countries, leading to a broader humanitarian disaster.
Notable Quote:
"If you have the entire higher echelon of military command assassinated... you have no other choice... to have some sort of deterrent effect."
[12:00] - Krystal Ball
The episode highlights the excessive risk involved, questioning the morality and strategic wisdom of such an approach.
The discussion critically examines the role of the MAGA base and foreign policy elites in shaping the US's aggressive stance. Krystal and Saagar argue that the influence of pro-Israel neoconservatives has significantly skewed US foreign policy towards militaristic solutions, marginalizing peaceful diplomatic efforts.
Notable Quote:
"This is not about popular will, this is alt. At the end of the day, foreign policy is the most elite of elite concerns."
[49:16] - Sagar Enjeti
This segment underscores a systemic issue where policy decisions are detached from democratic accountability, influenced instead by a powerful, insular group within the political hierarchy.
In wrapping up, Krystal and Saagar reiterate the precariousness of the current geopolitical climate. They call for increased public awareness and engagement to challenge the dominant foreign policy narratives and advocate for diplomatic, non-militaristic solutions to international conflicts.
Notable Quote:
"We have to argue on the merits, on the actual thing and say, look, this, this and this..."
[89:30] - Sagar Enjeti
They emphasize the importance of learning from past mistakes to prevent repeating the cycle of unwinnable wars and advocate for a re-evaluation of US interventionist policies.
Imminent US Military Action: President Trump is signaling a potential massive military intervention against Iran, with dire implications for regional stability and civilian lives.
Israel's Aggressive Tactics: Israel's direct attacks on Iranian media outlets and the blocking of US citizens are strategic moves to force US involvement.
Political Polarization: The overwhelming support from the MAGA base and the muted Democratic response reflect deep-seated political divisions and elite influence over foreign policy.
Historical Parallels: Lessons from past US interventions in Iraq and Libya suggest that current actions could lead to prolonged conflict and instability.
Media and Influence: Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon's opposition face significant challenges due to their limited influence against the entrenched pro-interventionist elites.
This episode of Breaking Points serves as a critical examination of the intersection between US domestic politics and international military strategies. Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti provide a sobering analysis of the potential consequences of unchecked interventionist policies, urging listeners to remain vigilant and advocate for more prudent, diplomatic approaches to conflict resolution.
Note: The timestamps provided in the quotes correspond to the transcript sections and are illustrative.