
Loading summary
Unknown Host
This is an iHeart podcast.
Tom Brokaw
NBC Nightly News legacy isn't handed down or NBC News. I'm Tom Brokaw. We hope to see you back here.
Lester Holt
I'm Lester Holt.
Unknown Host
It's carried forward. Tom Yamas is there for us.
Tom Yamas
Firefighters are still working around the clock.
Unknown Host
As the world changes, we look for what endures. We are coming on the air with.
Tom Yamas
Breaking news right now.
Unknown Host
We look for a constant and from one era to the next. Trust is the anchor for NBC Nightly News.
Tom Yamas
I'm Tom Yamas.
Unknown Host
A new chapter begins NBC Nightly News with Tom Yamas. Evenings on NBC.
Lester Holt
This Father's Day at Lowe's. Score free gifts for the greatest dad. Right now get a free Blackstone 8 piece accessory kit when you buy a Blackstone 28 inch griddle. Plus get two free select Craftsman V20 tools when you buy an RP brushless drill and impact driver combo kit. Shop these deals and more this Father's Day at Lowe's. We help you save valid through 615 wall supplies. Last selection, mirrors by LOC.
Unknown Host
Want to pull off the season's freshest trends? You just need the right shoes. That's where designer shoe warehouse comes in. Loving wide leg jeans. Pair them with sleek low profile sneakers.
Emily
Obsessed with the sheer trend.
Unknown Host
Try it with mesh flats. Feeling Boho comfy sandals. Nail the whole free spirited thing. Find on trend shoes from the brands you love like Birkenstock, Nike, Adidas and more at dsw.
Sagar
Hey guys, Sagar and Krystal here.
Unknown Host
Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left.
Lester Holt
And the right that simply does not exist anywhere else.
Unknown Host
So if that is something that's important to you, Please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today and you'll get access to our full shows unedited ad free and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media and we hope to see you@breaking points.com Happy Friday everybody. Emily, great to see you.
Sagar
Great to see you. We're waiting on Ryan Grimm, but he should pop up shortly.
Unknown Host
He'll make his grand entrance any moment now. You already made this joke. What are we going to talk about today? What's even going on? J.D.
Sagar
Vance made that joke.
Unknown Host
Just how you know that it's brilliant and original. We missed you yesterday when Ryan and I did our breaking news, so I'm excited to get your thoughts on this whole Elon Trump meltdown debacle. I mean, what are your like, top line, what are your reflections on what has unfolded thus far?
Sagar
So this is. I was wrong. I said on the show many, many times that I expected not a massive explosion in the relationship, but what we saw literally until yesterday, is what I thought was the likeliest scenario, which is that it would be a slow disentangling where everyone can save face because they both are very powerful and both have so much to lose. Now, what's interesting, I think, is all of this happened after Elon Musk came out and said he's done with political donations. And so I think the transactionality of the relationship was really hurt by the Wisconsin election that we covered and was really hurt by Elon Musk saying he can't, he's not even going to donate. And that I think made it easier for everything to ultimately blow up.
Unknown Host
Yeah, that changed the calculation on the. On Trump's part at least. And then Elon's calculations seemed to be changed somewhat by Trump pulling the plug on his NASA pick. Because when Elon couldn't have his guy at NASA to Shepherd through his SpaceX contracts and whatever to fulfill his grand mars ambitions, that seemed to have somewhat changed his calculus. Hey, Ryan, how's it going?
Tom Brokaw
Pretty good. How you doing?
Unknown Host
Good. So we're going to. I have like 1 million elements pulled on Elon versus Trump to go through just things that transpired since Ryan and I did our breaking segment yesterday. We also have Medea Benjamin from Code Pink who's going to join legendary activists. They just did an action with Representative Randy Fines office. He's the one who called for Gaza to be nuked. So always really inspiring. Great to talk to her. So she's going to join. Um, that'll probably be all we get through for the. The free show for premium subscribers. We've got some more stuff we're going to jump into. There's Zoron continuing to get asked his thoughts on Israel, which is. That's interesting in and of itself. We've got the KJP stuff that we didn't get to in yesterday's show because there was too much other stuff to get to. So we got a few other things and we'll take some questions from premium subscribers if you guys want to become a premium subscriber. We have brought back the monthly membership and, and if you use the code BP free, you can get a free month so you can try out this lovely product that we are offering and Ryan won't have to do any embarrassing ad raids, which he has decided to make a threat for the audience to coerce them into.
Tom Brokaw
You do.
Unknown Host
Sorry, I've been having gravy doing that.
Tom Brokaw
You do not want me doing that. And in the back half of the show, we can also talk about something I just broke, which is that next week, the House is planning to vote on a resolution that would deem the phrase Free Palestine to be, quote, an anti Semitic slogan.
Unknown Host
Jesus.
Tom Brokaw
They've tucked it into a resolution that condemns the. The Colorado terrorist attack in. In Boulder. But if you vote for that, to condemn that attack, you're voting for language that says that Free Palestine is an anti Semitic slogan that calls for the destruction of Jewish people.
Unknown Host
Wow. Wow, that is so devious. To put those two things together is so. Just incredibly devious. All right, I struggled with how to start the Elon Trump feud portion. So I thought we would start with, you know, the absolute most important news here, which is that Elon Musk has unsubscribed and unfollowed cat turd. You know, truly an end of an era.
Tom Brokaw
That's huge. Why did he do this? He's going to miss out on all of these insights.
Unknown Host
I mean, Catcher will still probably be in his feed, but depending on, I guess, how Elon rearranges the algorithm now for this new era. But it is pretty funny. He says, Catcher says breaking Elon Musk has unsubscribed and unfollowed me. Alex Jones says he's not in my Trump cult. Many large influencer accounts desperately tried to stay neutral today. I've never changed in years. If you want to criticize Trump's bill, no problem. If you don't like Trump's policies, no problem. I'm okay with that. If you don't like Trump's tariffs, I'll listen to your side. But when you come out and call Trump a pedophile, that's when you've crossed a red line. Don't care about anything you have to say after that. Emily.
Sagar
First of all, it was for Elon Musk, like, it started to be clear. Elon Musk started this by saying that tweet he posted, what was it? Monday or Tuesday? He posted one saying, I can't hold it in any longer. The bill is abominable. What did he call it? Abominable. A disgrace. And that was, I mean, before his criticism of the bill had been muted and I would say, civil and polite. And then he posted that and they could no longer do this dance, pretending that they were all on the same page and it was just a happy marriage. So to go from that, I mean, this is not zero to 100. This is zero to a thousand to. You're in the Epstein files. Musk created a problem for himself, which is basically, I helped elect a guy in the Epstein files, despite apparently being really serious about him. Said that I loved him as much as any straight man could love another man. And then working for his administration, it creates a problem for himself.
Unknown Host
Yeah. Oh, no doubt about it. I'll pull this up. So there's some reporting. It's been kind of interesting, Trump's response, because Elon has gone as scarce scorched earth as you possibly can. Right. Bringing in Epstein saying, you only won the election because of me, which is another admission, Right. That this richest man on the planet believes that he was able to successfully buy the presidency of the United States is, like, also an extraordinary admission there. So he has gone as scorched earth as he possibly can. And my sense is Trump has been somewhat restrained. Like, he definitely has not gone as hard in response to as Elon has. Now, maybe that's because Trump has a lot more than just rhetorical arrows that he could shoot at Elon, right? He, you know, he threatened Elon's government subsidies for and, you know, contracts for SpaceX, which would be really damaging. For now, we really rely on SpaceX, both in terms of Starlink and in terms of, you know, the International Space Station, all this stuff, which, again, is another commentary on how much this one guy and this gigantic monopoly, like, how dependent as a country become on, you know, this monopoly. But Trump has the power to pull those contracts to investigate Elon Ban. And I've got a bunch of. A bunch of clips from him calling for Elon to be investigated and, you know, deported for his, you know, entering the country under false pretenses or resting his visa or whatever the immigration fraud allegedly is with regard to him. So. So maybe the reason why Trump rhetorically has been a little bit muted is because he has so much more that he can actually do to Elon. So much more heft, really, ultimately, than Elon has.
Sagar
And on the screen, these are the two true social posts that Trump has, and he was responding to reporters yesterday, too. But these are the two true social posts he's posted so far. Elon, I think, is up to dozens. Like, he's in the dozens over the course of the week. I think political, kind of like Snow 70. And that was before yesterday. So that's.
Unknown Host
Which Is actually a diminished pace on. For Elon, but yes.
Sagar
No, just on Trump is what they counted.
Unknown Host
Yeah. Which is something else, Ryan. There was Politico reporting that there was a possible detente. Signs of a truce are emerging and increasingly bitter clash. Trump projected an Arab nonchalance in an interview Thursday with Politico. White House aides, after working to persuade the president to temper his public criticism of Musk to avoid escalation, scheduled a call Friday with Elon to broker a piece. Oh, it's okay. Trump told Politico in a brief telephone call when asked about the very public breakup. It's going very well. Never done better. Trump went on to tout his favorability rating, saying the numbers are through the roof. The highest bulls I've ever had. And I, and I have to go. But this morning we have reporting from Jonathan Carl speaking saying that no, there is no phone call planned. Let me see if I can pull this one up as well so we can see it. In a phone conversation this morning, Trump told me Elon Musk is the man who has lost his mind. Trump did not, however, seem angry or even concerned about the feud, as reports there's going to be a Trump Must call scheduled for today. Trump told me he is not particularly interested in talking to Musk, although he says Musk wants to talk to him, which if true, is, you know, interesting dynamic there as well.
Tom Brokaw
Yeah, it shows. Trump very much believes that he's winning this breakup and also understood that Elon was becoming quite a drag on him and that the louder he breaks up with him, the less that that drag affects him going forward, you know, not.
Unknown Host
And the more he can blame anything bad that happens in his administration on Elon screwing up with Doge. Right.
Tom Brokaw
You certainly, you certainly could. Although it's, it's tough because it's like, people are gonna be like, well, who hired Elon in the first place? But, yeah, he, he, he loves to, like, blame, you know, John Bolton or whoever and, and talk about them as the biggest morons that have ever existed without even, like, bothering to reconcile the, the question of, like, well, then why should we trust your.
Unknown Host
Why should you?
Tom Brokaw
One that brought this moron in here in the first place. But whatever. Carry on. I wonder if this. You know, there's a lot of glee on the left about this, but is. Is. Is now the kind of Stephen Miller wing, just kind of completely unshackled. Like, was there any useful moderating force that Musk might have been playing? Emily, you think that now isn't being played?
Sagar
No, I Don't think so. And I don't think.
Tom Brokaw
Well, because we should just have Glee.
Sagar
I can't think of a way in which Elon Musk would have been a moderating force unless it was just purely on climate related provisions. Like if you're disentangling build back better or something like that. But I don't even know that there's much evidence he was doing that.
Unknown Host
Yeah, we don't see any indication that there was holding back on that. I mean, I guess the area I would say is maybe like on the tariffs, not Elon specifically, but having the like, tech right. In the coalition. But it seems to me like the moderating factor on the tariffs is more the bond market than it was, you know, target CEOs. Yeah, yeah.
Sagar
Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro immediately attacked Elon Musk over the tariff thing and like was talking about how he's just an assembler and not a manufacturer. So I think they were less, less listening to Musk and it was more Trump hearing from who was in the Oval Office. No, he. He watched Jamie Dimon on Morgan Mornings with Maria that day.
Unknown Host
That's right.
Sagar
And had Charles Schwab in the Oval Office.
Unknown Host
Right.
Sagar
He had a hell of a day.
Unknown Host
Yeah, no, that's right. I mean, there's so many interesting aspects of this. There's also. Everybody is waiting for what JD Vance was going to say, who was apparently recording a podcast with the ovan, which is going to be interesting as well. And Vance finally weighed in with kind of a. It's kind of like a weird, I don't know, what do you guys think of this tweet? He says at 10:30pm Right. So this is hours after the Internet has had everything to say about this dispute. And there's been so much back and forth and Epstein and you should be impeached. And one of the things that Elon Musk said is that Trump should be impeached and J.D. vance should replace him. And so this is what J.D. vance said. He said, president Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him. I don't know, what did you guys think of this insertion? Because, I mean, part of the reason why there's intrigue around J.D. vance is he's on the ticket because of Elon and Peter Thiel and the tech. Right. Like, he is Peter Thiel's protege. Peter Thiel funded his Senate campaign and, you know, funded his career. And that is really the reason why he ends up being the vice presidential pick. So everyone's kind of watching, like, all right, who's, whose side side are you going to be on? How are you going to play this out? Because the, the assumption was that he's there to be kind of their inside man and to make it so that after Trump leaves, they get their guy in the White House or at least as a Republican nominee after, you know, after Trump is done.
Sagar
Well, the thing that stood out to me in that. And Ryan, I'm curious because you've literally written books about this on the left, but on the right, when J.D. vance says to earn the trust, that to me was reflective of some type of, I think small, not significant, but, but some type of concern that Elon Musk could split the MAGA movement. And what J.D. vance was signaling there is continue to trust Trump, right? Quote, unquote, trust Trump. And that to me is very interesting that they, they are worried that maybe some people peel off and go with Elon. I think what we saw happen over the course of the day yesterday is basically, it looked like Trump people were with Trump. They were there for Trump first and foremost. But there, it seemed like there may have been some anxiety about where the Doge Bros. Elon people go.
Tom Brokaw
Ultimately, the complicating factor in all this is that, you know, The Donald Trump Jr. Played a significant role in lobbying his father to put J.D. vance on the ticket. So, but that, that's, and that's related to Donald Trump Jr's you know, dalliance with all of these, you know, oligarchs, as the family is trying to kind of take what it sees as its rightful place alongside the rest of these, these oligarchs. And so there's that, there is that link. So it's in an unusual way, in a kind of aristocratic way, you know, brought together, you know, the families bring, bring them together. So I, I do think that, yes, what J.D. vance is reflecting is the same thing that, that Trump was seeing that, that he's winning this. That even though Elon Musk is, you know, buying ink by the barrel, and even though he's got this, like, army of sycophants out on Twitter who he pays to say nice things about him, Trump is still Trump and Trump still captures the, the respect and the imagination of, of the MAGA movement. And so far I don't see it, you know, that the big beautiful bill may fall apart for other reasons, but so far it doesn't. Even though this whole fight was about that, it doesn't seem, at least from my perspective to be doing any real damage to it. Emily, are you seeing people saying like, oh, we need to revisit this in the light of Musk's criticism?
Sagar
No, it's the opposite. Truly, it's the opposite. There was all of this momentum before Elon went nuclear on bbb, that it was putting the screws to leadership and actually terrifying them. Like they were freaked out about this bill crashing and burning, which again, we've talked about many times. They need this from their perspective. It's not like an optional part of them having done all of these tariffs. It's a necessary part of it. They didn't think it would be a problem. And they were getting Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, potentially Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, but even just having Rand, Ron Johnson, potentially Mike Lee, who had been interacting with Elon Musk sort of civilly. So they were. They were having real problems with this. And now what happens is Elon Musk has for maga, if you're worried about getting reelected by Republican voters, and particularly hardcore MAGA voters, Elon Musk has made it Trump versus this disloyal oligarch. I'm not saying that's the right framing, but I'm saying that's the framing that MAGA is going to see it through now. And so it actually is going to make it easier for leadership to get a deal because now they have more leverage. And that if you're Mike Lee or if you're Ron Johnson, you don't want to look like you are taking Elon Musk's side in all of this. And so I think there's still going to be significant corrections to the bill. I shouldn't say corrections. That's the wrong word. But like corrections in their direction, they want to make more cuts. I think they're going to get that. But it's made it easier for leadership to get from point A to point B for sure. Because now part of the leverage they have is you look disloyal. You look like you're siding with Elon. If you continue to publicly make all of the create this public movement, this public campaign against bbb, you look like you're siding with Elon Musk over Trump.
Jennie Garth
Hey, this is Jennie Garth from I Do Part 2, Ozempic In a pill. It's oral semaglutide and is now available from Future health. Go to futurehealth.com to get affordable access to oral semaglutide, Ozempic and zepbound for only $3 a day, no insurance needed. Visit futurehealth.com future without the e to start losing this week. Future Health Weight Loss Data Based on independent study sponsored by Future Health Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Lester Holt
You're great at protecting your own personal information. You probably even use things like two factor authentication, strong passwords and a vpn. But as much as you try to be in control of how your information is protected, there are lots of places that also have it and they might not be as careful as you are. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second for identity threats. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan if you lose money due to identity theft. You might not be able to control how others handle your personal information, but you can help protect it with LifeLock, save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off terms apply.
Katherine Townsend
Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received hundreds of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders.
Sagar
I was calling about the murder of my husband.
Emily
It's a cold case.
Unknown Host
They've never found her, and it haunts.
Emily
Me to this day.
Unknown Host
The murderer is still out there.
Katherine Townsend
Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking.
Unknown Host
Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter.
Emily
She was still somebody's sister.
Unknown Host
There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for.
Katherine Townsend
If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Helen Gone murder line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Helen Gone Murderline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Unknown Host
Yeah, and what some of the MAGA people, including I don't know if Steve Bannon has come out and said this, but allude to the fact that basically their view is Elon is effectively trying to effectuate some sort of a Coup, you know, I mean, and look, fair enough when he's tweeting, like, impeach the guy and put it install JD Vance instead. Like, he's kind of announcing his intentions there. So fair. But, you know, Bannon is, Is going all in. Going very hard in the paint in ways that I really can't particularly disagree with. So let's go ahead and take a listen to a little bit of what he's been saying Trump should do in response to these moves by Elon.
Tom Yamas
He's a know it all. He knows some engineering. Don't get me wrong. I give a hat tip for that. But he doesn't know anything about the real world. Doge was for any voices exist while you're wrapping up in your cape tonight. Understand on Doge there was. He didn't find any fraud. There's plenty of fraud out there. Didn't fight. This is President Trump's first complaint. Was this all bs, right? With the, with, with the Doge. The action that President Trump should be taking immediately, I think when he threatens to take one of the big programs out of Space X, President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production act to be caught in SpaceX and seize SpaceX tonight before midnight.
Unknown Host
Seize SpaceX tonight before midnight. And look, I think SpaceX should be nationalized because it really does. This whole situation really does illustrate two things. Number one, the fact that you have Trump operating like this, you know, banana republic dictator who will pull your contracts if you disobey him and, you know, weaponizing the federal government, everyone just like, accepts that's the way he's operating. But number two, that you have this oligarch who runs this monopoly that our country in significant ways, actually truly is dependent on. So Bannon identifies, you know, pretty instinctively what, even though Trump has a much stronger hand to play here, that there are weaknesses that Musk is, you know, is in position to exploit because of having this gigantic monopoly that is so significant in terms of, you know, communications with the satellites, with the space program. And so he's saying, listen, you can't let him. You can't let him continue to have these choice because he will use them against you. You got to pull the pin on this right away tonight.
Sagar
That's why I also. Well, I was gonna say that's why I also predicted a more muted divorce. I mean, I agreed with everyone that a divorce was coming, but, like, the stakes here are unbelievable. And I think that's why Politico is reporting that they have a call scheduled for today. Because, you know, despite this kinetic breakup, this kinetic like war that we're. They're in right now, they have. So both of them have so much on the line to be throwing accusations about Epstein on the Internet at each other like a bunch of teenage boys.
Tom Brokaw
Yeah. To me, Starlink is the one that is the real threat to sovereignty.
Unknown Host
Yeah, agreed.
Tom Brokaw
Like that.
Unknown Host
Well, think of what, how he used.
Tom Brokaw
It, means of communication.
Unknown Host
Think of how he used it with Ukraine. Like, regardless of what you think about, you know, the Ukraine war and whether it was the right decision or not, he was like, I don't want you attacking Crimea, so you are not going to have access to Starlink in Crimea. And the Ukrainians really significantly depend on Starlink for comms. And you know, like it's, I saw a stat, I think something like 90% of the weight that's been shot up into space via, you know, satellites has come from SpaceX. They have really taken the lead in terms of, you know, we've, we decided, and this was really a kind of Obama era decision to outsource our own capacity, our own space, space capacity to the private sector. And Elon has become the primary, you know, beneficiary and contractor in that world. And so, you know, that's not only these whimsical flights of fantasy in terms of we're going to colonize Mars, but more immediately it is that, that like communications backbone that is incredibly important and he right now has control over. So Bannon, you know, immediately is like, you gotta, you gotta do something about this because this is a weakness that he could exploit.
Tom Brokaw
Although if the US is going to start nationalizing companies, I think they've, first they've got to win the confidence of the American people that they can actually run them first you got to like, get your air traffic controller towers working. Like it. Do the, do the basic stuff that we could do in the 1970s. Yeah, effectively. And then we'll talk about going to space again.
Unknown Host
I have some more ban in here for us to react to because I do think the things he has to say are pretty interesting. So let me, yeah, absolutely. Let me go ahead and put this up. He's, you know, and he's been critical of Elon the whole time and at times pretty viciously critical of Elon because Elon is this, you know, has this like, in my opinion, evil trans, like anti human ideology that, you know, Bannon also sees that way. In any case, let's take a listen to how he talks about this dispute.
Tom Yamas
Elon Musk is working for himself. President Trump empowered him more than anyone's ever been empowered in this government, had his back, promoted this guy. And when people like me who said, you're making a mistake, right, this is a bad guy, he's gonna turn on you. He's not with us. He's also totally incompetent. And President Trump said, hey, give this guy a shot. And I trust President Trump's judgment enough to say, as people know, I backed off a little, right? I backed off a little.
Tom Brokaw
But it's not about observation.
Tom Yamas
As soon as he didn't think he ran the deal or got the adoration right, that he was starting to be saying, where's the trillion dollars? Right, he turned on President Trump. But most importantly, he turned on the country and the American people. And President Trump just had enough of it, and he forced his way back in to have like, some last day. They didn't want to do that, but fine. And then as soon as President Trump comes out today and President Trump saying it in the nicest way possible about, right, the bill, ba bing, ba bang. The guy gets up and starts the most vicious stuff you could tweet. So all the fanboys defend this. He accused President Trump of basically being a group with those pedophiles on the island. He called for, he called for the president to be impeached and JD Vance to take his role. As hard as we've worked in all the years that we've walked in this audience's work, some punk is going to sit there and go, he always should be impeached. And hey, as sure as the turning of the earth, if those progressives rub up on him and say, hey, they're never gonna buy the, they're never gonna buy the Teslas. Where they're gonna buy the Teslas. They rub up on him, he'll write a $500 million check for Hakeem Jeffries. He'll be across the thing looking to impeach President Trump, looking to help steal the 28 election, looking to imprison President Trump. So here's my point. Let's get ahead of it.
Unknown Host
So if those progressives, Ryan, they rub up on him, he'll be there with his 500 million dollar check. And they're already rubbing up on him. He might be Iglesias, yeah. Rokana out there ready to rub up on him.
Tom Brokaw
So, and as he's saying, you might get ahead of it. And he says, he says we should deport him and seize his companies. I mean, Bannon does not play around. This is. He's he's laying down. He's laying down a marker. Yeah. And yesterday I was saying that there was this. He was on stage where somebody on stage with him had, like, joked or admitted that they kind of, like, came in illegally. That was with his brother, apparently. And he told his brother, like, what are you doing, man? It's not cool to admit to that. So, yeah, Steve Miller's looking through the file as we speak, no doubt about it. And there's no question Miller has ordered up, has requested, like, let me take a closer look at that file. Was he going to do anything with it? I don't know. Is he looking? You better believe it, huh?
Unknown Host
Yeah. Here's what you're referring to. Bannon says they should initiate a formal investigation of Elon's immigration status. I am of the strong belief he's an illegal alien. He should be deported from the country immediately, he said. In a phone interview, Bannon said the Trump administration should also investigate Musk's drug use and his effort to get a classified briefing on China from the Pentagon, which was reported by the Times. Bannon said Musk's security clearance should be suspended during those investigations. And, you know, the other thing that I was thinking about, and I saw an article this morning that the Doge boys are kind of freaking out about what their status is going to be in the government now, because Elon does.
Tom Brokaw
Have, in all of, feel really sorry.
Unknown Host
For them, big balls. It's all on the line. But Elon does have this, like, handpicked cadre of loyalists who are now installed in key positions all throughout the government, who have, you know, sleeper cells, deep state, you better wake up. All installed throughout the government. Who. I mean, we're joking, but these are people who have explicitly, when they came in, they aggressively sought access to these incredibly sensitive systems. And we have very little insight or transparency into who they are, where they are, what they've been doing, what they have access to, etc. So, I mean, that is another thing that Elon potentially has, because those are people who, you know, most of the install. You know, the people who've been installed in the Trump administration, most of them are Trump loyalists, but these ones were picked to be Elon loyalists, and they are now, like, you know, embedded throughout key infrastructure in. In the government.
Sagar
Yeah. And. But just a couple of weeks ago, Elon Musk said Doge is now a way of life. When he was leaving, he said Doge is now a way of life in the government and that it's. So what are these people's jobs. Right. Because basically there was this idea that it was Doge was going to kind of be under the direction of Russ Vogt, but it wasn' going to be Doge so much as it was going to be just an administration wide effort to make significant cuts to the administrative agencies while they have the power of the executive and to try to thwart those agencies from ever regenerating to their previous size. If you know the there's not a Republican president in the next four years, whatever. So what are their jobs now? Because they actually do work for the government. Are there going to be a wave of people is there going to be a wave of people who moved to Washington D.C. from wherever they were, Silicon Valley previous previously. Where do they end up? I mean are they just going to quit or are they going to cooperate with, for example, the efforts at the State Department, which now oversees usaid, to keep working to figure out what that looks like in the future? I don't know. I don't think we have a good answer to that question. And some of it may be hinging on the call that Trump and Musk have today.
Unknown Host
Well, if they have, I mean Trump is saying that's not happening. Yeah. So but who knows, he could be lying. We don't know.
Sagar
But he said the Xi Jinping call was. Yeah, I don't know what goes on.
Unknown Host
Who knows. I will say what, what Elon was sort of backing off some online too, you know, some like small 100 follower account or whatever. Was like you guys are both better than this. And Elon was like, you're right, I'm not going to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, which was the one that like you know, we use for the International Space Station or I think that's the one or whatever. But in any case. So he was also trying to somewhat moderate. So maybe there is some sort of reconciliation. I'll just say Medea Benjamin is, is waiting to get in so we'll go ahead and move on to, to talking to her about their activism. But I'll just say neither of these men are known for like discipline or self restraint even that even when it would be in their potential best interest. So you know, I would fully, personally I would fully expect even if there is a bit of a like calming of the waters for the moment and a bit of a detente that there could be renewed flare ups at any point in time because that's just who these, who these guys are.
Sagar
Yeah, I think that's right.
Jennie Garth
Hey, this is Jenny Garth from I do part two OIC in a pill. It's Oral Semaglutide and is now available from Future health. Go to futurehealth.com to get affordable access to Oral Semaglutide, Ozempic and zeppbound for only three $3 a day. No insurance needed. Visit futurehealth.com future without the e to start losing this week. Future Health weight Loss Data based on independent study sponsored by Future Health Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion over.
Katherine Townsend
The past six years of making my true crime podcast Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received received hundreds of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders.
Sagar
I was calling about the murder of my husband.
Emily
It's a cold case.
Unknown Host
They've never found her and it haunts.
Emily
Me to this day.
Unknown Host
The murderer is still out there.
Katherine Townsend
Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking.
Unknown Host
Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter.
Emily
She was still somebody's father, sister.
Unknown Host
There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for.
Katherine Townsend
If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Helen Gone murder line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Helen Gone Murder line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Unknown Host
I know a lot of cops and they get asked all the time, have.
Tom Yamas
You ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes. But there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this Taser the revolution.
Unknown Host
But not everyone was convinced it was that simple.
Tom Brokaw
Cops believed everything that Taser told them.
Tom Yamas
From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley comes a story about what happened when a multi billion dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission. This is Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated.
Sagar
I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad.
Tom Yamas
Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Binge episodes 1, 2 and 3 on May 21 and episodes 4, 5 and 6 on June 4 ad free at Lava for Good. Plus on Apple podcasts.
Unknown Host
All Right. Let me go ahead and welcome Medea in here. Hi, Madea, how are you?
Emily
Good morning. I'm good, thank you.
Unknown Host
Good morning. Nice to see you. You know Ryan and Emily, of course.
Emily
Say yes. Hello, Ryan, Emily.
Sagar
Can I tell a quick story, Crystal, before we dive in?
Unknown Host
Yes, of course.
Sagar
So, Medea, when I was in college, I was an intern at the American Enterprise Institute. And we used to have, I used to have to work the desk. So I used to have to work the desk to take phone calls. And there was a sticker of people not to let into aei. And your name was on it.
Tom Brokaw
Be on the lookout.
Emily
That was on there.
Tom Brokaw
Bolo Madea Benjamin.
Unknown Host
Yes. Absolute badge of honor.
Tom Brokaw
Who else was on there?
Sagar
I don't remember. I don't remember. I think it was like a handful of Code Pink people.
Unknown Host
Awesome. Love that. Love that. A testament to your effectiveness and your longtime commitment to peace and not war. And we wanted to catch up with you. You guys have been doing an extraordinary number of actions and quite significant. Also wanted to talk to you a little bit about the, the flotilla, the aid flotilla right now headed to Gaza because I knew you were supposed to be on one previously. But first of all, let me, let me pull up here. You all just did an action at Representative Randy Fines office. And for people who are unawares, he is this newly elected Florida Republican who called for Gaza to be nuked on Fox News in addition to saying all sorts of other just outrageous and atrocious things that anyone would think would be completely out of bounds, but somehow goes with barely a note in today's climate. So let me go ahead and pull up here. A little bit of the video of you all, you know, entering Randy Fine's office and, and what you had to say.
Emily
You were not here before when the two people with.
Unknown Host
This is the wrong one. Hold on, hold on. That was a different action that you guys did. Let me find it.
Tom Brokaw
Well, Medea tells. Yeah. While she's looking for it, you want to tell, tell us, you know, anything about the latest on the flotilla, then we can come back.
Emily
Well, it's getting close. You probably heard about the incident, you know, where they took these four people on board and then fished some refugees.
Tom Brokaw
Out of the water, Right.
Emily
Yeah. And so they went a little bit out of their way. Now they're back on track and they're headed towards Gaza. You know, having somebody like Greta Thunberg on board makes it very difficult for the Israelis. But what they have done in the past is board the ships and confiscate the ship and arrest everybody on board and deport them. So that might be what they're thinking now. Of course, they've done worse than that, like they did in the Mavi Marmara in 2010 and actually killed people. And, you know, they did bomb the ships, well, with drones. The ship that was supposed to be going, the larger ship that was going to carry about 150 people.
Unknown Host
Wow. I was able to to pull up that video I referenced before of you all at Randy Fines office. So let's go ahead and play some of this.
Emily
So get ready with us as we go into the office of Congressman Randy Fine, the most bigoted, hateful member of Congress as a Palestinian. Look what I have to stand up here and show you. We are here in Randy Vines office because we're very concerned about his rhetoric about Palestinians, Palestinians and other groups. I am a Palestinian. I'm mother of four children. I'm an American citizen. All my children are American citizens. And we're walking around hearing this kind of rhetoric. It's scary, it's nice. What kind of example are you giving that's right.
Sagar
To people in the United States, to young people.
Emily
We're all responsible here. History will not look kindly. Hashtag starve away.
Sagar
Shameful Congressman. A congressman who says such a thing.
Emily
Gaza must be destroyed. I've been to Gaza six times. I've seen the wonderful people that live in Gaza. People of Gaza are 2.2 million people. They are families, their children. There are women, there are men. There are ordinary people just like us. And to say Gaza must be destroyed is a policy that we are now doing and we have been doing now for 19 months.
Unknown Host
And so Medea, what sort of reaction did you get from the office when you were there and what was your goal also to accomplish with this action?
Emily
Well, we don't think that Randy Fine has gotten enough attention. I mean, you know, if any member of Congress from the Democratic side, like Rashida Tlaib or Ilhan Omar had said one of the things that he said, they would not only be censored. I'm sure there would be howls to kick them out of Congress. This is just disgusting stuff that he said and the American people don't really know. So we wanted to highlight it more. And, you know, we're always trying to reach people in his district as well, so that they start calling him and saying that this is just unacceptable. And I think it was quite interesting because they hesitated in calling the police. And I think that's perhaps because he's new and his staff doesn't quite know the ropes, but they don't have the protocols down yet.
Unknown Host
They don't have the sticker up with don't allow you in the office yet.
Emily
Well, you know, they do keep their office locked. You have to knock to come in, and they say, oh, you know, we get death threats and we're saying, hey, if you didn't put a hashtag starve away, bomb away, shoot away, I don't think people would be so mad at you. But the staff did listen to us, and not only that, they did give us a meeting later in the day. So we had about a half an hour sit down with some of the staff, which was quite interesting. And we've asked for a meeting directly with Randy Fine himself. So I just think it's an example of how we shouldn't let these things go by. We should contact these members of Congress. We should say that this is just not acceptable. We should be asking other members of Congress to censor them, which we have done. We file ethics complaints constantly against these members of Congress. I must say, we almost never hear back anything. And when we do, it's just, you know, thank you very much. But again, it's. We shouldn't let it go by.
Tom Brokaw
What was the staff meeting like?
Emily
The staff meeting was good. It was from the communications department. They wanted to hear from us more. We asked them if they think this kind of rhetoric doesn't translate into threats against not only Palestinians and Muslims, but Jewish people as well. And isn't this harmful?
Tom Brokaw
What'd they say to that?
Emily
Well, they said that they had a lot of the standard things. One of the women there was saying that she was recently graduated from a university and how Jewish students are not safe. And this rise in antisemitism is something that Randy Fine is trying to deal with. And of course we say, well, he's dealing with it in the exact opposite way. They just kept saying, he's trying to defend the Jewish people and, of course, defend Israel. I don't. I can't say that we moved them, but later on in the afternoon, there was somebody who I can't identify, but he came by and quietly said to us, thank you so much for coming by the office. We really like this kind of language and know that there are people inside all of these offices. And, you know, we hear this constantly. It's unbelievable. Certainly from the younger people, we hear it. We hear it from the front desk staff people. We hear it from the cafeteria workers. We hear it from the people cleaning up. So, you know, that's why we're in the offices every single day, because we think just our presence there is important.
Sagar
And that's what I wanted to ask about because I find that so interesting. I mean, Tucker Carlson just spent a not insignificant portion of one of his shows trashing Randy Fine. And we've covered a lot of polling about the disconnect between younger and older right leaning Americans on the question of Israel and Gaza. And so media, I'm curious how your or what you've noticed over time as you've been doing this, having conversations with people who are at least formerly very associated with the neoconservative wing, probably still are, but maybe their staff isn't. Are you noticing something different in the last couple of years or is that just a lot of talk? Like, what have you seen.
Emily
Emily? You're right, it's absolutely changed. I mean, first is the generational divide. We see it constantly. It's very unusual. In fact, that young woman that I mentioned about, Randy Fines, she was unusual in that she really stuck so much to this. You know, Israel is right. We find that not only is there a generational dividend, people of color versus white people divide, it is much more sympathetic among the black members of Congress, not the members, the staff people, certainly the Muslim ones, but also the Latinos. You find a lot of support among Latinos. And then in terms of the Congress people themselves changing. Well, of course, we have seen this ever so slowly. I was in Tom Massey's office yesterday and actually met him and he said, I'm sure you love my tweet, didn't you? In which he said, no more money for Israel. And I said that was significant. Yeah, it was significant. But we said, you've got to be working with other members of your party. We need a breakaway moment for Republicans. We have about 25 Democrats who have introduced a new resolution to block the bombs. And that was started by Delia Ramirez with a number of great members of Congress. We need something like that on the Republican side. And because it's so divisive politically, even Republicans like Tom Massie or Marjorie Taylor Greene, they don't want to sign on anything that comes from the Democrats. So we tell them, start your own. And we've been focusing a lot on Republicans going to their offices every single day. And sometimes in a more aggressive way like Randy Fine, and sometimes in a very respectful, nice way. And we have made some good relationships in those offices. So we're just waiting for the moment where they finally will break away. And you know, we say to them, Trump is counting on you to support him in the dialogue with Iran. And Trump doesn't want to see a continuation of these wars. And so you can really be helpful. We kind of, you know, swallow deep when we go.
Unknown Host
Nice jiu jitsu move. Got to do what you got to do. What have you seen.
Emily
Was there?
Unknown Host
What have you seen in terms of, like, public support for Code Pink and number of volunteers for these actions? You know, what is the sort of ebb and flow of that been?
Emily
Well, it's just been going up and up and up and up. I mean, that among younger people, people who are not US Citizens, it's harder for them to join us. And they tell us all the time, we wish we could be there with you, but we're concerned about everything that you can imagine, their jobs, their student loans, everything. So it falls to a smaller number of people to do it. But we have a great group of people, and it changes. We get new people constantly who go around with us in the halls every day, making the visits, doing the rounds, bringing in the latest piece of legislation, asking them to sign onto it, asking them to put out public statements condemning things like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. And in terms of the support, it's unbelievable. I mean, members of Code Pink, we walk around on the streets, and people will stop their cars to get out and give us hugs.
Unknown Host
That's beautiful.
Emily
We're constantly getting thanks from people, and it's going up and up and up. And I think it's the starvation that people just can't stand. They've unfortunately gotten used to the bombings with seeing that for 19 months, but now the starvation, and that is something, I think that's hard for the members of Congress to do justify as well. Of course, you know, they try to say it's Hamas and Hamas stealing the food and that kind of stuff, but, you know, it doesn't really pass the what, the what test, the smell test.
Unknown Host
We'll say any test.
Emily
So, yes, we're getting more and more support.
Tom Brokaw
I don't know if you saw this, but about an hour ago, I reported that next week Congress will be voting on a resolution that will be standard resolution condemning the terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. But embedded in it, it said it will deem that the phrase Free Palestine. And let me put this up here. The phrase Free Palestine is an anti Semitic slogan. So, yeah, yeah, it's an anti Semitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and the Jewish people. So, yeah. Whereas while shouting Free Palestine, an anti Semitic slogan. So you've seen These resolutions a lot before that. It'll say, you know, we condemn this, you know, truly awful thing. And then they embed within it something that they're trying to trap Democrats and everybody else into, into agreeing with. And in this case, it's. It's to agree that the phrase Free Palestine is actually an anti Semitic slogan. How do you think that'll go? Like, do they still have the juice that they can ram this through? Are people still too afraid of voting no and being told, how dare you not condemn this terrorist attack?
Emily
Well, yes. You see how sneaky they are. But I think this kind of thing is just played out too much and doesn't have any weight anymore. It's just a ridiculous thing to do. And many times we've seen that some of these worst resolutions don't even pass. And then if they do pass, they don't have the weight of law. As soon as we hear something like that from you, Ryan, and thank you for alerting us, we'll go into Congress and we'll just be going from room to room shouting, free Palestine. Free Palestine. So this kind of thing is another scare tactic, but I think we're way beyond that.
Sagar
And one that maybe since you just talked to people like Thomas Massie who have been against that Medea will be blocked by enough Republicans. I'm curious what you think about that.
Emily
Yes, as long as they know what they're voting for and that we have to make sure they do. I mean, we see people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, you know, who doesn't want to vote for these kinds of things. And so, you know, we go to her office and we alert them, we go to the other offices. But you're right. I think there's enough Republicans that'll say, you know, this, this just.
Tom Brokaw
Although there'll probably be enough Democrats to push it over the top. But the, the first part I noticed when I, after I reported it, the first person that responded to it was a, was a Bannon person who tagged Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Unknown Host
Oh, interesting.
Tom Brokaw
Saying, help us out here.
Unknown Host
Wow. Interesting.
Tom Brokaw
What some members do on these is they just vote present because then they're not endorsing it one way or the other. Just, just to say, this is a game and I'm not going to participate in it.
Emily
Right. And I think, you know, that these kinds of things, they're just losing their power. And I feel like AIPAC is losing its power. AIPAC doesn't have the power to get to the president into the White House. AIPAC certainly, you know, I'm not saying they don't have tremendous power, but I don't feel like they can ram through things like this the way they used to be able to because there are a couple of Republicans who are standing up. So, no, the tide is turning so, so, so slowly, but it is turning.
Unknown Host
Medea. What about on the Democratic side? I mean, on the one hand, you have more dissent from the lockstep pro Israel consensus and pro genocide consensus. On the Democratic side, on the other hand, you have, I think, a much vaster gulf between where the elected Democrats are and where the bases. I mean, the base of the Democratic Party has basically wholesale turned on. You know, this onslaught in Gaza are disgusted with it. They don't want weapons going, they want it to end, they want aid to go in, et cetera. And so have you seen a shift among Democratic members as well in the way that they're, the way that they're interacting with you, the way that they're feeling about how they should approach these issues?
Emily
Well, as I said earlier, I think the starvation issue has really changed things. I think it has made it very, very uncomfortable for these pro Israel Democrats to be sticking with the line that the Gaza Humanitarian foundation is the way to go, that UNWRA is full of Hamas supporters and we couldn't possibly go with that. You know, we have been pushing that Democrats have to support the United nations now that we have Marco Rubio sanctioning the icc and now that we have this just dystopian form of, quote, getting food into Gaza, I think it's a chance now for getting some more of these more conservative Democrats to go back to saying we have to support the UN agencies. You know, maybe they don't want to say UNWRA specifically, but, you know, we have the World Food program. And Cindy McCain has been so good on these issues of saying that Hamas is not stealing the aid. So I think this gives us a little more opening to reach some of those conservative Democrats, at least on this issue of starving people is not something that the US can support. And then there's also, you know, the issue of a ceasefire, which has really not. There's not a vehicle within Congress to show support for a ceasefire right now. Yeah, that's not vehicles for the food issue. And now this issue about banning some weapons. But we definitely need to bring back up the ceasefire. And that's tough for Democrats because, you know, they see this now in the Republican court and it's up to Trump to figure this out. And they don't want to be seen as pushing him on the ceasefire issue.
Unknown Host
Madea, do you get still get like personally nervous when you're gonna jump up on stage or jump up in an audience or go into a member of Congress's office and be like, stop supporting genocide. Like, do you, have you done it so many times that you don't get nervous for these sorts of things? Because sometimes, I mean, you've been roughed up, like you've been, you know, arrested, I'm sure, countless times. Is it intimidating to you still or you just kind of, it's just your day?
Emily
Well, the only thing I get nervous about is that I've had a broken shoulder and it's a bad shoulder, it hurts all the time. And that's exactly where they take you to arrest you. And if they're gonna arrest you in a very tough way, you know that that can have longer term consequences. So that's the thing that makes me nervous. I don't get nervous going into Congressional offices and I want people listening to know that the vast majority of our time we're going into Congressional offices to have nice meetings and we want people to come and join us and not be afraid that you're going to get arrested. And we need more people. So please come join us. When we are doing something about arrests, it's usually because we are taking an extra, going an extra step and challenging them. If it's in a setting where there's a lot of security around and you think you're going to get roughed up, yeah, that is what makes me nervous. There was a group of Doctors Against Genocide that was in Congress last week and they were considering maybe risking arrest, but they decided it wasn't worth it and had been given warnings that they were protesting by walking around in the lobby of the Hart Building with a couple of them with photos of starving children. And when they were given their third warning, they started walking out the door and maybe saying something like, bread, not bombs. And seven of the doctors got arrested. So the police in the Congress are really ready to pounce on people. So we want to make sure that people who go with us who don't want to get arrested are very much aware of when you are risking and when you're not.
Unknown Host
Medea, how can people help out, join up, participate in one of your actions?
Emily
Well, thank you for asking that because there are so many ways that people can and need to participate. If you're in the D.C. area or can even come here for a few days or take your vacation time or your student recess time, come and join us in Washington. D.C. and we are in the halls of Congress every day, definitely Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursdays, which are the days that they are in session. And you can sign up on the CodePink website under DC Actions to Learn more about that. But more important for people all over the country is to just get involved with CodePink. Go to our website. We have very, very creative actions that we have been coming up with and asking people to do. You asked about involvement. I mean we now have so many people involved and it's the power of the people that counteracts the power of APAC. So please go to codepink.org and join us in any way that you can. We also have many, many chapters, I should say, and so there might be a chapter in your city.
Unknown Host
Amazing. Medea, so much respect for you and it's always an honor to get to talk to you. So thank you so much.
Emily
Thanks for having me on.
Unknown Host
Yeah, it's our pleasure. And thank you guys for watching this portion. We are going to go ahead and transition to the premium subscribers portion of the Friday show and Ryan will talk more about the news that he's breaking. We've got some more stuff out of Israel that we want to cover. Maybe talk about kjp, maybe talk about Zoron, take some questions. So if you want to get a jobs report too. That's right, we did get jobs report. Yeah, we should take a look at that as well. So if you want the whole show, the whole Friday show, sign up breaking points.com avail yourself of that offer promo code bp free so you can get first month free and we will go ahead and start that portion now.
Jennie Garth
Hey this is Jenny Garth from I do part 2 ozempic in a pill. It's oral Semaglutide and is now available from Future health. Go to futurehealth.com to get affordable access to oral semaglutide, ozempicious and zepbound for only $3 a day. No insurance needed. Visit futurehealth.com future without the E to start losing this week Future Health Weight Loss Data Based on independent study sponsored by Future Health Future Health is not a healthcare services provider. Meds are prescribed at providers discretion.
Lester Holt
You're great at protecting your own personal information. You probably even use things like two factor authentication, strong passwords and a vpn. But as much as you try to be in control of how your information is protected, there are lots of places that also have it and they might not be as careful as you are. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second for identity threats. If your identity is stolen, a LifeLock US based restoration specialist will help solve identity theft issues on your behalf, guaranteed or your money back. Plus, all LifeLock plans are backed by the million dollar protection package, meaning LifeLock will reimburse you up to the limits of your plan if you lose money due to identity theft. You might not be able to control how others handle your personal information, but you can help protect it with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com iheart for 40% off. Terms apply.
Katherine Townsend
Over the years of making my true crime podcast Hell n Gone, I've learned no town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've heard from hundreds of people across the country with an unsolved murder in their community.
Sagar
I was calling about the murder of my husband.
Tom Brokaw
The murder is still out there.
Katherine Townsend
Each week I investigate a new case. If there is a case we should Hear about, call 678-744-6145. Listen to Helen Gone Murderline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Unknown Host
This is an iheart pod.
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar Episode: 6/6/25: Elon Floats Trump Coup, Bannon Says Deport Elon, Israel Protests & MORE! Release Date: June 6, 2025
In this episode of Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar, hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti delve into the escalating conflict between Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump, the radical proposals by Steve Bannon, and the ongoing activism surrounding the Israel-Gaza situation. The discussion is rich with insights, notable quotes, and in-depth analysis, providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of these pressing issues.
The episode begins with Krystal and Saagar unpacking the sudden fallout between Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
Saagar reflects on his initial expectations:
"I was wrong. I expected not a massive explosion in the relationship, but what we saw was what I thought was the likeliest scenario, a slow disentangling where both could save face."
[02:40]
However, recent developments have shattered these expectations:
"Elon Musk said he's done with political donations. This transactionality hurt their relationship, making it easier for everything to blow up."
[03:30]
Krystal further analyzes Trump's strategic restraint:
"Trump has a lot more than just rhetorical arrows against Elon. He threatened Elon's government subsidies and SpaceX contracts, which are vital for national infrastructure."
[04:40]
Despite Musk's aggressive stance online, Trump's response has been notably measured, possibly due to the significant leverage he holds over Musk's enterprises.
The discussion shifts to Steve Bannon's vehement stance against Elon Musk. Bannon advocates for extreme measures to dismantle Musk's influence, including:
Deportation of Elon Musk:
"Elon Musk is an illegal alien. He should be deported immediately."
[22:51]
Nationalization of SpaceX:
"SpaceX should be nationalized because it represents a monopoly our country is too dependent on."
[23:28]
Bannon argues that Musk's control over critical infrastructure like Starlink poses a threat to national sovereignty, urging Trump to take swift and decisive action.
Krystal counters this viewpoint by highlighting the complexities and potential consequences of such actions:
"Nationalizing SpaceX would require restoring basic national functions before any space endeavors can resume. It's a drastic measure with far-reaching implications."
[26:25]
The feud has broader political ramifications, particularly concerning J.D. Vance's emerging role as Trump's potential replacement. Saagar notes:
"J.D. Vance's recent endorsement of Trump signifies a commitment to maintaining trust within the MAGA movement, preventing a split caused by Musk's influence."
[15:31]
Sagar adds:
"Vance aimed to reassure the MAGA base that Trump's leadership remains unchallenged, despite Musk's disruptions."
[16:24]
This alignment suggests that Trump's base remains steadfast, even as internal conflicts surface, ensuring minimal damage to his political standing.
A significant portion of the episode addresses a contentious Congressional resolution:
"Next week, Congress plans to vote on a resolution that condemns the Boulder, Colorado terrorist attack while simultaneously deeming the phrase 'Free Palestine' as an anti-Semitic slogan."
[05:22]
Saagar criticizes the resolution's dual intent:
"Combining condemnation of terrorism with labeling 'Free Palestine' as anti-Semitic is deviously manipulative."
[05:39]
Krystal echoes this sentiment:
"This resolution is a scare tactic designed to trap Democrats and silence pro-Palestinian voices by equating legitimate advocacy with anti-Semitism."
[51:19]
The hosts argue that such resolutions undermine genuine debates and efforts toward peace, instead promoting divisive and harmful rhetoric.
The episode features an insightful interview with Medea Benjamin from Code Pink, focusing on their activism related to Israel and Gaza.
Medea recounts their recent actions:
"We entered Congressman Randy Fine's office to protest his call for Gaza to be nuked, emphasizing the humanity and suffering of Palestinians."
[40:06]
She elaborates on the lack of accountability:
"If Democrats had made similar statements, they would have faced immediate backlash. This double standard highlights the urgency of addressing such rhetoric."
[41:21]
Krystal highlights the effectiveness of Code Pink’s strategies:
"Code Pink's presence in congressional offices pressures legislators to reconsider their stances, fostering relationships that could lead to meaningful policy changes."
[42:10]
Saagar discusses the growing public support:
"Support for Code Pink is increasing, especially among younger generations and communities of color, indicating a shift in public sentiment towards more peace-oriented policies."
[48:27]
Through persistent advocacy and strategic actions, Code Pink aims to influence both Republican and Democratic stances on the Israel-Gaza conflict.
The hosts explore Elon Musk’s significant influence over government operations and national security, particularly through his control of SpaceX and Starlink.
Krystal emphasizes the dependency:
"SpaceX and Starlink are integral to national communications and military operations. Musk's influence over these entities gives him unprecedented leverage over government functions."
[25:05]
Sagar adds:
"With Musk controlling the communication backbone, his ability to influence or disrupt national security measures is a critical vulnerability that Trump might exploit."
[25:09]
This dependency underscores the urgency of addressing Musk's growing power within the government infrastructure.
As the episode draws to a close, Krystal and Saagar speculate on the possible futures of the Trump-Musk feud and the broader political landscape.
Krystal posits:
"Despite the current tensions, both Trump and Musk have immense stakes, which may lead to a temporary detente. However, personal animosities suggest that future flare-ups are inevitable."
[27:18]
Saagar concurs, noting the high stakes involved:
"The potential for escalation remains high, especially given the critical roles both individuals play in national and global arenas."
[25:05]
Medea concludes with a call to action for listeners:
"Support Code Pink by joining our activism efforts. Engage with your local chapters and participate in actions aimed at promoting peace and accountability in government decisions."
[58:38]
This episode of Breaking Points provides a thorough examination of the intricate and high-stakes conflict between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, the radical proposals by Steve Bannon, and the pivotal role of activism in shaping the Israel-Gaza discourse. Through expert analysis and firsthand accounts from activists like Medea Benjamin, Krystal and Saagar offer listeners a nuanced perspective on the forces shaping contemporary American politics.
Notable Quotes:
Saagar on Musk-Trump Relationship:
"I was wrong... what we saw was what I thought was the likeliest scenario, a slow disentangling where both could save face."
[02:40]
Krystal on Trump's Restraint:
"Trump has a lot more than just rhetorical arrows against Elon. He threatened Elon's government subsidies and SpaceX contracts..."
[04:40]
Steve Bannon on Deporting Musk:
"Elon Musk is an illegal alien. He should be deported immediately."
[22:51]
Medea Benjamin on Congressional Staff:
"We had a half-hour sit down with some of the staff, which was quite interesting."
[43:15]
Saagar on J.D. Vance:
"Vance aimed to reassure the MAGA base that Trump's leadership remains unchallenged, despite Musk's disruptions."
[15:31]
Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar continues to deliver incisive and fearless analysis of the political landscape, holding powerful figures accountable and amplifying voices that challenge the status quo. This episode underscores the complex interplay between influential personalities and the broader implications for governance and activism in the United States.