Krystal Ball (2:06)

Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election and we are so excited about what that means for the future of the show.

Saagar Enjeti (2:13)

This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else.

Krystal Ball (2:19)

So if that is something that's important to you, Please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today and you'll get access to our full shows unedited ad free and all put together for you every.

WashablesOfAs Advertiser (2:29)

Morning in your inbox.

Saagar Enjeti (2:30)

We need your help to build the future of independent news media and we hope to see you@breaking points.com well, with.

Krystal Ball (2:39)

A government funding deadline coming up on September 30th, shutdown brinksmanship now finds itself at the center of populist politics once again. But of course, we're not talking about Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, although we'll get to them in just a moment. We're talking about Ezra Klein. We're talking about progressives in the House and in the Senate who now face quite an interesting decision to fund the government or not to fund the government, to cooperate with Republicans or to push for a shutdown and rally the troops. Let's go ahead and put up on the screen this Ezra Klein op ed, which was everywhere. You've probably already seen it actually. This is C1. Actually, we're going to play a sot of Ezra Klein talking about the op ed he wrote in the New York Times. The headline was Stop Acting like this Is Normal. And towards the end of the piece, Ezra Klein says, I'm not a political strategist. I hope somebody has better ideas than I do. But it's been about six months since Schumer decided that it wasn't the time for a fight, referring back to the brief moment where Democrats considered in March a government shutdown that neither he, Ezra continues, nor the country was ready. Democratic leaders have had six months to come up with a plan. If there's a better plan than a shutdown, great. But if the plan is still nothing, then Democrats need new leaders. So let's go ahead and bring Ezra in himself via the SOT from the New York Times.

Ezra Klein (3:59)

We are no longer in the muzzle velocity stage of this presidency where Donald Trump is trying things and seeing what sticks. We are in the authoritarian consolidation stage of this presidency. I want to be very clear about what I'm saying here. Donald Trump is corrupting the government. He's using it to hound his enemies, to line his pockets and to entrench his own power. He is corrupting it the way the Mafia would corrupt the industries it controlled. You could still, under Mafia rule, get the trash picked up by cement, but the point of those industries had become the preservation and expansion of the Mafia's power and wealth. This is what Donald Trump is doing to the government. This is what Democrats cannot fund. I think the case for a shutdown is a shutdown is an intentional event. It's an effort to turn the diffuse crisis of Trump's corrupting the government into an acute crisis that the media, that the public will pay attention to. Right now, Democrats have no power, so no one cares what they have to say. A shutdown would make people listen, but then Democrats would have to actually win the argument. They would need to have an argument in my head. The argument is something like this. Donald Trump won the election. He is the legitimate president. His government should be funded so long as it is acting the way the government is supposed to, serving the people, being held accountable. But there are red lines that cannot be crossed. ICE can conduct legitimate deportations, but it can't be masked men roaming the streets, refusing to identify themselves or their authority.

Krystal Ball (5:44)

Remember your right to remain silent.

Ezra Klein (5:46)

The Trump family cannot be hoovering in money and investments from the countries that depend on us and fear our power and our sanctions. There have to be inspectors general and jags and career prosecutors watching to make sure the government is being run on behalf of the people rather than on behalf of the Trump family. Democratic leaders have had six months to come up with a plan. If there is a better plan than a shutdown, grate. But if the plan is still nothing, act normal and hope for the best, then Democrats need new leaders.

Krystal Ball (6:21)

So what Klein is calling for there is Democrats to use some of their votes in the Senate to say, no, Trump, you have to come to the table or this is a government shutdown. We are going to be okay with this idea of taking the blame. We're going to get into that in a moment because it goes back deep into Republican politics over the last 10 plus years. Because it's worth it on our end to hope the messaging that comes out of all of this is that, yes, we want the blame for shutting down the government because we're trying to have Donald Trump come to the table on reasonable demands about very unpopular measures he has taken. So maybe that involves ice, maybe that involves making the issue about some of these government agencies that have been defunded. You could come up with a million different ways that Democrats can message this, but they didn't want to do it at all, all back in March. And Klein's argument is the world has changed since then. What he's saying doesn't apply now for Schumer's case is the judiciary has not stopped a lot of Donald Trump's priorities. That's, that's the Ezra Klein case. But let's go to Capitol Hill where Mike Johnson was addressing some questions about it just yesterday. House House Speaker Mike Johnson about a potential shutdown and the funding battle. This is C2.

Mike Johnson (7:37)

House Republicans continue to work through regular order to fund the government for FY26 for the next fiscal year. We're working closely with the White House and the Senate to ensure we meet our deadlines. And Chairman Cole, Tom Cole of the appropriators continues to diligently work towards getting all 12 bills out of committee. And they're almost done with that. And as we get closer to the funding deadline, though, we recognize the shutdown chatter from the left is growing louder. Some of these people seem to enjoy this. It seems Democrats may take the path of maximum resistance and try to shut the government down. Democrats are willing to work with us. We have our sleeves rolled up, and we want to do this in good faith. We just have to think responsibly how to spend less money than we did last year. And if they're willing to do that, and it's incumbent upon all of us to do it with the high national debt, we're open to that. But the ultimate question of whether there's going to be a government shutdown at the end of the month is going to be up to congressional Democrats, and that's just the way it is.

Krystal Ball (8:30)

Was that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and John McCain circa 2014 or 2013 that I was hearing? No, of course, that was Mike Johnson saying Democrats are looking like they want to choose the path of, quote, maximum resistance. Maximum resistance. Okay, now, this came on the heels of report from Punchbowl. So this is John Bresnahan. Next element we can put up, he said news. House Democrats had an angry caucus meeting this morning. So that was yesterday over government funding and possible shutdown. Rank and file. Dems want party leaders, especially Schumer, to be willing to shut down the government in order to get what they want on Obamacare and Medicaid. That post in and of itself, I mean, if you just reversed the parties and put it up verbatim in 2013, would be such a. Such a parallel to what's happening right now. A number of Democrats stood up to complain at the meeting. Most of the anger was aimed at Chuck Schumer and Senate Democrats, but Bresnahan reported, so. So let's then get in our time machine and go back to 2013 and listen to the way some Republicans. Mike Lee. We're going to have a clip from Mike Lee and then we're going to have a tweet from Ted Cruz that we're going to put up on the screen. We just want to revisit the tone that Republicans were taking back in those battles, because what Democrats are actually talking about right now is the potential substantive effect of a fight. But more than anything, the effect that a fight would have on Morale and on Democrats national messaging strategy, because we have covered here poll after poll showing the Democratic Party's brand is absolutely in the tank. It is a total crisis level for national Democrats and they need a better messaging strategy, obviously. So some of the argument from Ezra Klein and others right now is this is your opportunity to say what Democrats are for in a way that actually puts the onus on Donald Trump to do something. And that is what has been debated for the last 10 years because the Washington establishment said all of these shutdown fights made Republicans look like foolish obstructionists. And we remember how the Jeffersons were treated on Veep. Right? They called themselves the Jeffersons. That was part of the joke, the Freedom Caucus group that was parodied on Veep. You probably remember well, this was the cultural treatment of the Tea Party. They're obstructionists who cared more about shutting down the government than making the government work for people. And that's a powerful argument as far as it goes. But at the same time, Obamacare, we forget, went through a very unpopular around this time period in ways that Democrats can reflect on now. So here's a little gift. This is a flashback to Mike lee during the 2013 shutdown battle.

Mike Johnson (11:10)

The position taken by the Democrats is not defensible. What they're saying is, unless you fund everything in government, including Obamacare, we will not let you fund anything.

Saagar Enjeti (11:21)

That's crazy.

Mike Johnson (11:22)

The American people know what's crazy.

Ryan Seacrest (11:24)

President Obama said he would, he would.

Mike Johnson (11:26)

Be willing to negotiate if you reopen government and if you raise the debt ceiling. What would you say to that? Well, I'd like to know what it is that he's willing to negotiate on. I mean, first of all, the fact that he's even willing to negotiate at all is itself a welcome change. But it is a change because so far what he's been telling us is you do it my way, you do it exactly my way, or we will not do it at all. He can't do that. He's not a dictator, he's not a despot. He does have to deal with Congress. So if he's willing to negotiate, that's great.

Ryan Seacrest (12:00)

The other thing is, I'd like to.

Mike Johnson (12:01)

See where he's willing to negotiate. This back in early July was when I saw that he was changing the law. When I saw that the president himself was saying this law is not ready to implement and he's not going to follow it, I thought, well, Congress shouldn't fund it if it's not ready. If he's not going to follow, he's not a dictator.

Krystal Ball (12:16)

He's not a despot. Referring to Barack Obama at the time, because Mike Lee said he has to work Congress. So if Senate Democrats deprive Republicans of the 60 votes that they need to pass a bipartisan continuing resolution, because this is the ridiculous way that we fund our government, which, by the way, Mike Johnson was opposed to, but if that's what we are doing, then Senate Democrats can force Donald Trump to come to the table. Or, I mean, the cost of forcing Trump to come to the table is taking the blame for shutting down the government. But Democrats can use that as an opportunity to say if Donald Trump wants to fund the government, exactly what Mike Lee is saying there to Barack Obama. If Democrats want to fund the. If Donald Trump wants the government to reopen, he can actually accede to some reasonable popular demands about X, Y and Z. Maybe it's usaid, whatever it is, I don't think that would be a popular demand. But just one example of the many things that Donald Trump has changed. Not all of them are popular. Some of them are, but not all of them are. And so then Democrats have an opportunity to make the fight about that and say, Donald Trump is not a dictator. He has to work with Congress. We are Congress, and we're asking for these things to be done. So let's put this next element on the screen. It's Ted Cruz. I went deep back into Ted Cruz's Twitter history. This is 2013. Obama admin chose to shut down government rather than defund, slash, delay Obamacare. Not long ago. Yet here we are. So listen to the verbiage there. Obama Admin chose to shut down the government rather than defund, slash, delay Obamacare. Obviously, I mean, of course, we all knew at the time. I mean, even in that Mike, that Mike Lee clip we just ran, the Kyron was Peter King. There's a flashback Republican Peter King referring to them as the, quote, suicide caucus. That was the internal battle happening among establishment Republicans and Tea Party Republicans at the time. And look at this. C6. This is from the Peter Sosnik memo that went super viral. Always does whenever it comes out. When it was published in Politico a couple weeks ago, it's Gallup data. It goes back to January of 2008, and it shows Republicans favorability with their own party and Democrats favorability with their own party. The Democrat level right now is at 73%. 73% Democrats favorable of their own party. 91% Republicans currently favorable with their own party. The only time either party has had any level of Favorability that low? Guess when it is. 2009. Republicans in 2009. And if you argue that the Tea Party wasn't a successful populist takeover of the Republican Party, you're wrong. You're wrong. Donald Trump completely showed that. In fact, Donald Trump learned from that. So if you are a populist progressive Democrat right now, it is abundantly obvious. Sager and this block was your idea. Yeah, well, it's 20 minutes right now.

Saagar Enjeti (15:12)

That's why I asked you to do it.

Krystal Ball (15:13)

But it is so obvious for Democrats that they have a golden opportunity on a platter in front of them. And if they are too bitch ass.

Saagar Enjeti (15:24)

To take it, they definitely are, by the way. Well, I think there are a lot. They're just like the Republican leadership of that time. The Boehners and the others are like.

Krystal Ball (15:34)

Look, that's not even Boehner went along with it at the time.

Saagar Enjeti (15:36)

That's true. I mean, eventually did cave, but you know, for. I'm trying to think about the original Republican leaders. They're like, well, that's not how we do things. John McCain Process and we have the committees. And they were like, bro, you're not listening. You're not understanding how angry people are right now. But I mean it is an open question. Did it work? Like, what is the legacy of shutdown politics for Republicans? I'm not sure it did. Like, right. The original. What was the big shutdown? 2013. That was after 2012. Pre DACA. It kind of inspired Obama to do DACA. So I would say a bit of a backlash. But my point though is that I kind of think Obama won. If you go back and you look at some of the polling now, look, you could make an argument in the long run, cuz in the immediate term, remember Obama shut down the national parks. People freaked out. They blamed Republicans. They called it. I remember Boehner shutdown was trending. You know, the Democrats were very sophisticated at that time and also they had the media on their side. I guess this time around the media probably would be on the Democratic side, but.

Krystal Ball (16:32)

Oh, totally.

Saagar Enjeti (16:33)

And it would satisfy like the bloodlust for a lot of the Democratic voters. But people get real mad whenever they don't get paid or there's not basic government services. And I'm not sure who they would blame. It's a different.

Krystal Ball (16:43)

Except fellow workers right now despise Trump.

Saagar Enjeti (16:45)

That's true. Yeah. So maybe they would eat it. I'm not so sure. You take two paychecks away from somebody and that's a little dangerous. Trump did buckle, to be fair in the first shutdown under his administration. I covered that extensively. It was like a 17 day shutdown and he basically cave to Nancy Pelosi and to Chuck Schumer because he knows it's bad, because he knew his bad.

Krystal Ball (17:04)

He's uncomfortable with it for himself. And that's where I think Mike Johnson, the thought of him, the sound that we played of him earlier saying, we don't want to do this, we don't want to do this, we want to work with Democrats.

Saagar Enjeti (17:13)

Right.

Krystal Ball (17:13)

Actually interesting, because he sounds sincere in that to me, because I think he knows the president does not want this battle.

Saagar Enjeti (17:18)

Yeah, that's true. I mean, yeah, I don't know who would fall on, you know, at this point, but yeah, I wonder, I do wonder if it's worth doing just purely politically for the Democrats, solely to show, yeah, we can do something. We're not just gonna give them what we want. You have to extract some pound of flesh. The thing is though, as you and I know, is when the Republican leaders would eventually cave to Obama or they would do some sort of deal where Obama supposedly caved to them, it was never enough for the Tea Party Caucus or anything. They were like, no, we can't go.

Krystal Ball (17:49)

All in, because that wasn't the point. Right. The point was radical.

Saagar Enjeti (17:52)

I'm saying, though, 10 years later, 12 years later, actually, do you think it worked out for the Republicans, like in the legacy of shutdown politics?

Krystal Ball (17:59)

I think it worked out for the Republican politicians. So a lot of people from that era have gone on to be the heavy hitters in the Trump administration. I don't think Republicans would look at this generational change of the party with Trump without these shutdown fights, because what they did was show national Republicans that the base, the people are in the county party headquarters making the calls, knocking on the doors, were so, so, so very mad at the party. And that was a lesson that I think eventually is why Republicans gave way to Trump in a way that Democrats didn't give way to Bernie.

Saagar Enjeti (18:37)

Oh, interesting.

Krystal Ball (18:38)

To their benefit.

Saagar Enjeti (18:38)

That's very true.

Krystal Ball (18:40)

But that said, I think Republican voters continue to lose because look at this administration. Is there an actual populist will in the administration to do what Republican voters really wanted with the Tea Party, which was not all that different in despite at the time, people thinking it was between Occupy Wall street and the Tea Party was this sense of injustice and unfairness. And that has not been remedied, nor will it be remedied in the near future. Even if Democrats, I mean, that's where this could be a politically disastrous decision for Democrats because based on their class bubble, they could end up picking the absolute dumbest battles to shut down the government over it. Like I was joking earlier about usaid, right? Like are they going to shut down the government to bring back usaid? Don't put it past them. They actually are that stupid. Are they going to shut down the to protect some of the like 30 year old single men who are taking jobs away from poor Americans by being here illegally or entering the border? I mean there are some things on deportations they could do that I think would be popular. But watch them choose like the dumbest popular, dumbest possible bat.

Saagar Enjeti (19:44)

Yeah, I don't know. I mean, yeah, I think that they care more about process and all that stuff more than anything. You're right. But would not put a USAID shutdown past them. I have no idea actually which way they will go, but I enjoyed your trip down memory lane. Thank you for updating us all. Let's go to you are the shutdown expert. We always will. We'll keep you up and we'll keep you that resonant here at breaking points.

LG X Boom Advertiser (20:06)

Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable LG X Boom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new hot because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom and for a limited time save 25% at LG.com with code Fall25. Bring the boom X Boom.

WashablesOfAs Advertiser (20:36)

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return, shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back Upgrade now@washablesofas.com. offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

Ryan Seacrest (21:36)

It is Ryan Seacrest here. There was a recent social media trend which consisted of flying on a plane with no music, no movies, no entertainment. But a trend would be going to chumbacasino.com it's like having a mini social casino in your pocket. Chumba casino has over 100 online casino.

Tim Dillon (21:52)

Style games all absolutely free.

Ryan Seacrest (21:54)

It's the most fun you can have online and on a plane. So grab your free welcome bonus now@chumbacasino.com sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary VGW Group Void we're prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.

Saagar Enjeti (22:07)

Let's go to Venezuela, shall we? So I've been wanting to cover this for a while. I know it's a little bit dated, but it is an important conversation. Let's go ahead and put this up there on the screen. So there was a big debate amongst Republicans about the strike by the United States military on these purported drug dealers off the coast of Venezuela after the designation of Trende Aragua, a gang in Venezuela, as a foreign terrorist organization for trafficking drugs. So that was the justification for the strike, that it was an imminent security threat to the people of the United States. So J.D. vance tweets, quote, well, killing cartel members who poison our fellow citizens is the highest and best use of our military. Brian Krassenstein, who for some reason is back on Twitter, says killing the citizens of another nation who are civilians without any due process is called a war crime. JD responds, I don't give a shit what you call it. So this kind of ignites a Libertarian versus Republican civil war that erupted with Rand Paul entering the fray. Let's go to the next part here, please. Rand Paul responds, quote JD I don't give a shit. Vance says killing people he accuses of a crime is the highest and best use of the military. Did he ever read To Kill a Mockingbird? I'll return to that, Rand, we need some better references. Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial or representation? What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without trial. He goes on and gives several interviews expounding on this as to why he decided to pick this fight. Take a listen.

Rand Paul (23:44)

The reason we have trials though, and we don't automatically assume guilt, is what if we make a mistake and they happen to be people fleeing Venezuela, the Venezuelan dictator? I think probably that, you know, we had the facts correct. We got bad people here. But that's the reason, like, off our coast, it isn't our policy just to blow people up. And it's hard because obviously they're bad people. So people, like, they want something bad to happen to them. But typically, even the worst people in our country, if we accuse somebody of a terrible crime, they still get a trial, basically. They get a lawyer, they get their day in court.

Mike Johnson (24:16)

But if we're at war, you know.

Saagar Enjeti (24:18)

We blow up bad guys all the time.

Mike Johnson (24:20)

I think that's what they're saying.

Saagar Enjeti (24:21)

This is a war in our country.

Rand Paul (24:22)

War is the exception. So when we have a war, it was intended that we would declare war, be a big vote of our Congress. And then at that point in time, we say, if that enemy, if we are at war, let's say with Venezuela, then we say their ships are, you know, free to shoot them anywhere they are, any time. And so we kill them off their coast, we kill them in their country, but we've declared war on them. It's a little harder here because this is a crime and this is a criminal syndicate, as it's not as simple as it may sound that, oh, let's just kill drug dealers, because sometimes you have to figure out who people are before you kill them. That's the problem.

Saagar Enjeti (24:58)

All right, so, Emily, what do you think about the. So, you know, I've been kind of rolling over this, and I want to give Rand credit because the guy spoke up about the killing of an American citizen who was drone struck by the Obama administration back in 2013 when it was not popular. He brought up due process. By the way, that is by far one of the craziest things that's ever happened because it was basically an extrajudicial killing of a US citizen abroad where they gave him, quote, due process inside of the executive branch without ever bringing it to the judicial system. But he talked about it broadly, and this is something that a lot of libertarians and others have been talking about. You know, with the original argument. I think what I find most despicable about it is conflating that these cartels are the ones who are killing Americans, because it's not even true. In the case of Venezuela, that's what is like you are hijacking a legitimate sentiment. 100,000 people a year dying from fentanyl. 99%. This is from the US government. DEA figures 99% of all fentanyl that enters the United States comes from Mexico, and originally the precursors come from China. 99%. 90% of all. I think 93% of all cocaine which enters the United States is from Colombia, transited via Mexico through the border here into the US which is obviously also tainted with fentanyl. So the cartels that are responsible for this are the Sinaloa cartel, you know, whatever, the new generation cartel, all of these, whatever various subgroups and others that exist inside of Mexico. It's one thing to say those are the people. But Trende Aragua, I mean, this. We had Juan David Rojas here on the show and he's like, guys, these are engaged in human trafficking, which is a horrible, despicable crime. But to the extent that they're doing drug dealing, it's street dealing. And to me, I said, this is not an industrial. It's not an industrial drug dealing. Fentanyl, which Siloa and others are. Yeah, they are. They literally are. But we're not doing anything presumably about that.

Krystal Ball (26:59)

That.

Saagar Enjeti (27:00)

It's like this seems cover to me as. This literally just seems covered to me as a regime change.

Krystal Ball (27:06)

Yeah, 100%.

Saagar Enjeti (27:07)

We have a $50 million boundary on Maduro's head because he's engaged in drug trafficking again.

Krystal Ball (27:11)

And Hegseth did not rule that out.

Saagar Enjeti (27:13)

Right. 7% of all cocaine not from Colombia and Mexico transits via all of these other countries, including Venezuela. So this is like even calling it tertiary is not even fair. And we have this huge US military presence. We have a $50 million bounty on Maduro's head. We struck this speedboat which allegedly was carrying. Okay, whatever. You know, we don't, we don't even know if any of that is true.

Krystal Ball (27:38)

Because they will not say they will not.

Saagar Enjeti (27:40)

They won't even say they won't release the evidence. So I'm like, well, you know, for me, and I think Glenn Greenwald brought up a great point. It's like this looks like a Noriega style regime change operation all over again. And I think it would be a different story if it was about the Mexican drug cartel. By the way, you want to know why they haven't struck the Mexican drug car cartels? Because what is it, 50% of trade, maybe 40% of trade moves across the US Mexico border. And they're not going to do anything to jeopardize that because it would destroy the entire US Economy. For Mexico and Canada. There's no way US Military strikes are going to happen in Mexico and they're not going to shut the border down. Sheinbaum and others, it's never going to happen. And for them, what they allow basically is like, you know, we have all this new cooperation. It's all bullshit if you ask me. But my point is just that, that the actual cartels that are doing this are facing nothing. Like nothing. But then the sideshow with Venezuela, all of a sudden, their cartels and their poison, it's like, guys, it's not even true about what's happening here. And this is use of the United States military regime change literally openly being crowd about by our current Secretary of State in Venezuela. In Venezuela, which is like the neocon wet dream. Everything about this stinks makes too high heaven. And that's taking it out of the first principles, due process type stuff. This is because that's a good argument too. Hey, the U.S. coast Guard intercepts these ships all day long. We prosecute people, we have international agreements, et cetera. Why didn't you do that? It's to send a message. It's like, okay, send a message to whom? And send a message for what? To the Maduro government, who then overflew US military sites and then Trump tells generals, you can go and shoot them down. Do we want to be in a hot war with Venezuela again over a country which 0% of fentanyl enters the United States of America from? But that's the problem. Nobody even does enough cursory Google search to look at even the mainstream media when they cover this. They're not giving you the facts about the.

Krystal Ball (29:27)

They're like, oh, it's trend.

Saagar Enjeti (29:29)

It's trend. They're Aragua. They are involved in drug trafficking. And you're like, well, what kind? You know, I mean, it doesn't take a genius to figure this stuff out.

Krystal Ball (29:37)

I mean, technically the drug trafficking is accurate. But to your point about Juan de.

Saagar Enjeti (29:40)

V inside of Venezuela, by the way, I don't give a shit who drills drugs in front of Venezuela. Definitely not to the point of using the US military to do it.

Krystal Ball (29:48)

Yeah. So I mean, and you get into these process arguments and it sounds like from JD's perspective. So when you're talking like JD Vance's here, I don't give a shit. That is probably not that difficult to sell. Definitely to Republican voters, I was gonna say. I mean it's perfectly consistent from many people in the Republican Party who never really changed their mind on, for example, the aumf. I went back and looked to see what Matt Garrett Gates has said about this and he's tweeting his interview with JD Vance and saying, no apologies, American flag emoji, where Vance is saying, if you are engaged in war against the American people, you are at risk of having your entire Operation literally blown to bits. By the way, that can be perfectly true. And also not, for example, while also, for example, not having the Secretary of Defense War. Pete Hecks said, by the way, I don't have any problem with the Secretary of Defense of Defense changing the name to the Department of War because it's much more.

Saagar Enjeti (30:47)

Honestly, we talked about it here on the show. I agree, I totally agree.

Krystal Ball (30:50)

But anyway, all that is to say this is like Matt Gaetz was against the authorized use of military force being used in Africa when he was a congressman and all of that for good reason. Now, Pete Hegseth has recently said it's no different than Al Qaeda. Right. Did you see that from him? He said no different from Al Qaeda or the Taliban. If you're in a boat, you're going to get struck. And of course, again, we haven't seen the evidence that this is, you know, not a potential mistake as Rand Paul cited. Maybe it's not. Maybe these were actual narco terrorists. Maybe. Let's just say it was Sinaloa. Let's say it was actually the people who are bringing fentanyl into the United States. The argument from a lot of conservatives who started to rethink the neoconservative policies that got us into quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan is actually that the process is really important because when you start to paper over the process, you give oligarchs essentially power to do regime change, wars without democratic buy in and in ways that end up being, well, let's use the word again, quagmires, because they were not well thought out and they were based on crazy levels of intelligence. I've been reading the Michael Isakoff David Korn book called Hubris about how he ended up getting to Iraq. And it's funny that those are the two authors who wrote that book about how we cooked it up, the intelligence case. But when you then look at how the Trump administration now is connecting trend Aragua to cartel of the Suns to Maduro, right?

Saagar Enjeti (32:28)

And say that Maduro, oh, it's literally just like Iraq. It's the same. It's the same shit.

Krystal Ball (32:33)

It is.

Saagar Enjeti (32:33)

And look, no one's claiming here that hundreds of thousands of troops are going to go into Venezuela. Okay, I don't think they're that dumb, hopefully.

Krystal Ball (32:41)

But if there is a military strike in Mexico, which I don't necessarily agree with you won't happen. I could see some type of precision action or whatever. But if troops die, if American troops die in Mexico, right?

Saagar Enjeti (32:50)

Yeah. People are gonna freak out and they should.

Krystal Ball (32:52)

What happens then?

Saagar Enjeti (32:53)

Well, okay, why do you think that the Mexico thing would happen? I just don't see. If they were gonna do it, they would have done it. The Sheinbaum government has made it entirely clear nobody is setting foot on Mexican soil. We have the greatest trump card of all, literally card of all time, which is the vast majority of the goods that you rely on, you know, I mean, could go on forever. In terms of the amount of stuff that the crosses the US Mexico border on a daily basis, is that really going to be put into jeopardy? That's why I don't think it's even happening. It's not even the conversation. I don't think they beat their drums hard about, we're going to go after the cartels. And it's all bullshit, you know, none of it, not a single one of those things has materialized.

Krystal Ball (33:31)

I don't think you're wrong about that. But I think what we're seeing with them building this cartel case, I feel like part of it is that they're trying it with Venezuela and trying to build a case potentially for Mexico, because I think Hegseth actually, like, they have all these ideas about precision type strikes that they could do in Sinaloa in a way that Sheinbaum, for example, might actually welcome, which she wouldn't right now because this is like, about Mexican sovereignty or whatever. But what happens when they start turning the screws to the Mexican economy or threatening to turn the screws to the Mexican economy in a much more serious way? But also what worries me most is like, what happens if a CIA guy doing anti narco terrorism stuff in Sinaloa gets killed? Killed? What happens when there is some type of, like, we've already seen drone action since Trump's come to office on the border. What happens when there's an Reynosa, some type of drone activity from CIA or DOD or whatever? Do we get pulled into something? That possibility is what does worry me.

Saagar Enjeti (34:29)

Definitely. And by the way, all of this is not exactly out of the realm. Remember, there's some crazy stuff that went down with the US and Colombia back in the 90s and there's. They even made movies about it. Clear and present danger. All right, let's go. Let's end with some words from Glenn Greenwald, who did a great job of breaking this all down. Let's take a listen. MAGA was supposedly a movement principally of younger people who looked at all these wars and said, why? Why do we keep bombing people all over the world? Why don't we keep getting involved in these foreign conflicts, why don't we focus on our own country that's falling apart instead? And yet it's been amazing for me to watch how easy it is to.

Ryan Seacrest (35:08)

Convince most Trump supporters, not all, but.

Saagar Enjeti (35:12)

Most, to just start cheering for the very words they said they were against.

Ryan Seacrest (35:18)

You just tell them these are bad guys.

Saagar Enjeti (35:20)

I think he's right. I think people should have a lot more scrutiny and not just take people's word for it about fentanyl or any of this. It takes, look, go on ChatGPT, go on Google. I mean, do we just sit here? Are we mindless drones? It's not that difficult, you know, and I did this for all of the. Remember, anytime there was some strike in Yemen or any of this, they all fall apart like this almost every single time. But you know, that's what politics is.

Krystal Ball (35:44)

And by the way, you also end up killing civilians and enraging their communities against the United States.

Saagar Enjeti (35:50)

That actually happened. You know, I used to think that was leftist talking point. I started looking into it. I was like, no, they're actually right. It's true, 100%. Well, great.

Krystal Ball (35:59)

And Glenn's in a position to know that because over the last 10 years he's talked to many people on the right, including both of us, who hopefully will remain consistent on this. But he's talked to many people on the right. I'm probably thinking of Matt Gaetz. We'd have to ask Glenn if that's someone he is in mind, who made these cases to him and with him.

Saagar Enjeti (36:14)

Right? That's right.

Krystal Ball (36:15)

On the basis of constitutional law.

Saagar Enjeti (36:17)

Very important point.

LG X Boom Advertiser (36:19)

Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable LG XBoom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom and for a limited time save 25% at LG.com with code Fall25. Bring the Boom XBoom.

WashablesOfAs Advertiser (36:50)

There's nothing like sinking into luxury. At WashablesOfAs.com you'll find the Annabe sofa which combines ultimate comfort and design at an affordable price. And get this, it's the only sofa that's fully machine washable from top to bottom. Starting at only $699. The stain resistant performance fabric, slipcovers and cloud like frame duvet can go straight into your wash. Perfect for anyone with kids, pets or anyone who loves an easy to clean spotless sofa with a modular design design and changeable slipcovers. You can customize your sofa to fit any space and style. Whether you need a single chair loveseat or a luxuriously large sectional. Annabe has you covered. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your home. Right now you can shop up to 60% off store wide with a 30 day money back guarantee. Shop now@washablesofas.com Add a little to your life. Offers are and certain restrictions may apply.

Ryan Seacrest (37:51)

Looking for excitement?

LG X Boom Advertiser (37:52)

Chumba Casino is here.

Ryan Seacrest (37:53)

Play anytime. Play anywhere. Play on the train. Play at the store. Play at home.

LG X Boom Advertiser (37:57)

Play when you're bored. Play today for your chance to win.

Ryan Seacrest (38:00)

And get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for?

LG X Boom Advertiser (38:03)

Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play.

WashablesOfAs Advertiser (38:06)

Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games including online Slash Thoughts, Bingo, Slingo and more. Live the chumba life@chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary.

Ryan Seacrest (38:17)

VGW Group void. We're prohibited by law. 21/ terms and conditions apply.

Saagar Enjeti (38:23)

Let's get to a UFO. Crystal's not here. We can do a UFO. I'm joking. She never holds.

Krystal Ball (38:27)

Mom's away.

Saagar Enjeti (38:28)

Yeah, she never. She doesn't hold me up anytime. I want to cover the story. There was a big UFO hearing yesterday. Again, I'm very sorry that I could not attend. One of the major headlines out of it is a new video that was released ostensibly showing a UAP in which a hellfire missile was fired and it seems to glance off. Now I'm gonna give you some countervailing evidence. I wanna be clear that shows that it could be a balloon. But I do wanna at least give it some credit for the video being released. Let's go ahead and put it up here on the screen. So you can see here, this is a 2024 incident, allegedly according to the congressman who released it. And you can see the object moving over. Soon you're actually going to see a hellfire missile come. It glances off and you can see that it continues basically dodging. So that is the alleged evidence that was included there from the congressman. There's a couple of other angles that you can see from it. What's important though, I think is not just the video that was released, but actually some of the testimony, including here from U.S. air Force veteran Dylan Borland, who testified on witnessing a quote, silent 100 foot equilateral triangle that rapidly ascended to commercial jet level in seconds. At Langley Air Force Base. Let's take a listen.

Dylan Borland (39:49)

From 2011 to 2013, I was stationed at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, conducting 24 hour operations via manned and unmanned aerial vehicles for special operations forces and the global war on terror. During the summer of 2012, my team was on standby for weather and I returned to my barracks on base. And at approximately 0130 I saw an approximately 100 foot equilateral triangle take off from near the NASA hangar on the base. The craft interfered with my telephone, did not have any sound, and the material it was made of appeared fluid or dynamic. I was under this triangular craft for a few minutes and then it rapidly ascended to commercial jet level in seconds, displaying zero kinetic disturbance, sound or wind displacement. Some years after that experience, I was further exposed to classified information from the UAP Legacy Crash Retrieval Program through a sensitive position I held within a special access program. During this time, intelligence officers approached me in fear for their own careers, citing misconduct within these programs and similar retaliation that I was already enduring at this time.

Saagar Enjeti (40:53)

That was followed up also with testimony from George Knapp, who is one of the best journalists on the UFO subject, has been for decades here. And here was some of the testimony that he offered.

Mike Johnson (41:03)

It's been widely reported and suspected that Lockheed Martin is one of the contractors, the defense contractors that has held this stuff, stored it away in secrecy and tried to figure out how it works. I have confirmed on the record that Robert Bigalow and a trusted colleague from OSAP met with and negotiated with senior executives at Lockheed Martin and hammered out a deal wherein Bigelow's company Bass, would receive a quantity of unusual material that had been stashed away and protected at a facility in California. That material was not made here.

Saagar Enjeti (41:39)

That has long been part of some of the UFO communities. Reporting is basically that defense contractors are used as cutouts so that you can have plausible deniability. It also goes to the fact the Pentagon pass an audit because nobody knows where some of this black money and all this other stuff goes. I do want to give some credit to some of the people who are saying that this video is not actually showing a ufo. Now again, I will let you make up your mind for yourself, but this actually comes from a guy who I very much respect, Joe Murgia. UFO. Joe, let's put it up here on the screen. And so what he says is that from one of the. Basically he looked into it, they talk about the Hellfire missile. What he says specifically is that, quote, contact occurred with a missile passing through the Apparent deflection was a guidance system searching for a laser spot, again causing control surfaces to thrash. The three trailing objects align better with debris or internal components ignited by electrical damage rather than missile fragments. Artifacts are possible, but unlikely. Let's go to the next part here. And they say the overall conclusion is that the evidence is most consistent with a slow moving or stationary balloon carrying an electrical payload struck by a Hellfire that failed to detonate. Anomalies arise from fuse mechanics, et cetera. I will let others determine the facts, but that was some of the original kind of quote, debunking that I saw on it. You can make up your minds for yourself in terms of what it comes from. It was Representative Eric Burleson, by the way, who is the person who revealed it. And it's one of those where it was presented as received from an independent, from a whistleblower, according to him. But the circumstances are a bit weird. He said he received it without any metadata or any of that. And he says independent review is ongoing. So I do think it's important to at least present the fact that some analysts and others are saying that it could have been a balloon, which they say about all of them. And so, you know, to be, I want to be totally fair about. That's part of the reason independent review is very important, part of the reason. Throwing it to the experts, et cetera, and actually taking this stuff seriously. But nonetheless, it was great to see George Knapp and some of the others there recounting some of their experiences. I do think some of us are still getting very fed up with the future fact that it's still so slow moving. I attended the first UFO hearing, what, two years ago, you know, at this point. Yeah, this is the third one, but I'm saying the very first one with Dave Grush. Right. I was there, you know, I was in the room. I thought it was a big moment. I thought something was coming. And then, you know, the NDAA continues to not have some of the UFO disclosure pieces, even though it's been pushed by members of the overall U.S. senate. So we rely on Anna Paulina Luna or other people are making extraordinary accusations, I'm very willing to believe. But we, we got to see more evidence. We got to see more stuff come from the government.

Krystal Ball (44:16)

An interesting disagreement playing out on X right now between UFO Joe and Lou Elizondo.

Saagar Enjeti (44:22)

Yeah, that's right.

Krystal Ball (44:22)

On News Nation last night made a very interesting argument which is that the Hellfire missile UFO is evidence of, quote, technology that is making our premier missile system Completely useless. And if you're wondering why, in relation to what Sagar just described about the ndaa, why are members of Congress and even remember Marco Rubio as a senator.

Saagar Enjeti (44:43)

He was an og. That's right.

Krystal Ball (44:45)

Mainstre members of Congress interested in getting answers to questions like these. Well, it's because they're seeing videos and hearing analysis from people like Lou who worked at the Pentagon.

Saagar Enjeti (44:55)

Right.

Krystal Ball (44:56)

You can debate Elizondo, whatever, but saying this is evidence of technology that's making our premier missile system completely useless. Now, UFO Joe disagrees. He says early on I agreed. Right now I do not. I retain the right to change my mind, to loop present any analysis or mention anybody who has an analysis besides the stuff shared on here by us. But that gets to, to what Sagar was just saying, which is that years into this third task force meeting, the bombshells are highly disputed. You know, it's not like this bombshell dropped yesterday and everybody was like when that New York Times story originally dropped back in what, 2017. Oh, yeah, 2017.

Saagar Enjeti (45:30)

And that's what. That's when. That's why I'm here.

Krystal Ball (45:31)

It all broke into the. Yep.

Saagar Enjeti (45:33)

That's the only reason. That's what got me in.

Krystal Ball (45:35)

But we haven't had another moment like that, really.

Saagar Enjeti (45:38)

It's been a while. Dave Grosch was very important, I think as well. But that's true.

Krystal Ball (45:42)

That's true.

Saagar Enjeti (45:43)

I just got to see more. And, you know, credit to Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp and all these guys, they're the ones who are at the vanguard. They're pushing the conversation. They're singularly responsibly. They're getting responsibly vetted. And I do. That's why I include all of the information. You can make up your mind for yourself. I think more scrutiny, pressure on these, you know, the Democratic, the Democratic Republican establishment to get the stuff out there is just so vitally important if you want to get, get to the truth. Because at this point, you know, you have congresswomen and others people making major accusations or allegations, which I'm totally willing to believe. But we have to see more evidence in the future. That's the number one important thing. So, yeah, call your congressman, tell them to our senator, get them to make sure the NDAA is going to have that. What's it to them, right to the ua, it's like so low on their priority list that if even 20 people call about it, maybe they'll do something. Something. You never know. You truly never know. All Right. Let's get to the Tim Dillon segment that we have been. We put off yesterday because we talked too much. Luckily, Emily and I still did talk a lot. But luckily, we still do have a few minutes here that we can go over it. Let's go ahead and play this. It's Tim Dillon and Joe ROGAN Talking about AOC and J.D. vance, quote, not having it for President. Let's take a listen.

Tim Dillon (46:57)

Now. Why is AOC shutting her mouth about Israel? Because aoc, these donors are big Israeli tech people. She's been silenced. And she's trying to run for president, too.

Saagar Enjeti (47:09)

Really?

Tim Dillon (47:10)

Yeah.

Ryan Seacrest (47:11)

She'll struggle.

Tim Dillon (47:13)

She's not going to win. She's a goofball. She'd be making mojitos.

Ryan Seacrest (47:16)

She's a goofball.

Tim Dillon (47:18)

She doesn't have it. She's a goof. But here's the reality. She's shutting her mouth about Israel. Is AOC out there about Israel?

Ryan Seacrest (47:26)

No. No.

Tim Dillon (47:27)

Because she's a fraud.

Ryan Seacrest (47:28)

Fraud.

Tim Dillon (47:29)

But the smelly, gross, anarcho communist in Brooklyn, to their credit, no, she's a fraud. They know she's a fraud. In between their, you know, whatever, open mic nights and whatever, they figured out poetry slams. Poetry slams and dog walking, they figured out that this is a fraud. Big time.

Ryan Seacrest (47:53)

Yeah, I don't think she was when she first started.

Tim Dillon (47:55)

She wasn't, but she got. She was probably. She's realized. She has. She's ambitious.

Ryan Seacrest (48:00)

She likes nice bags.

Tim Dillon (48:02)

She likes nice bags.

Ryan Seacrest (48:03)

That's what it is.

Tim Dillon (48:03)

She's ambitious. She wants to be the president.

Ryan Seacrest (48:05)

You realize that job can get you hundreds of millions of dollars. Look what happens.

Tim Dillon (48:09)

Can you get up who her donors are? Jimmy? These. These Israeli tech people. It's kind of interesting because this actually just kind of came out.

Ryan Seacrest (48:17)

Israeli startup entrepreneurs played roles in the rise of Alexandria. Ocasio, Cortez, she pulled out of an event commemorating Rabin.

Dylan Borland (48:26)

Some concluded that AOC doesn't like Israelis.

Ryan Seacrest (48:28)

But two were instrumental in the lawmaker's early career. That's where it gets weird. They find you when you're young.

Tim Dillon (48:34)

They find you when you're making mojitas.

Ryan Seacrest (48:36)

They find you when you're young and promising, like JD.

Tim Dillon (48:41)

Well, that's the thing. JD's gonna have to. If he wants to be the president, he's gonna have to say, peter Teal.

Ryan Seacrest (48:45)

I'm not.

Tim Dillon (48:46)

He's gonna have to say, peter Teal is Satan. And here's why that's good.

Ryan Seacrest (48:53)

J.D.

Tim Dillon (48:54)

Has to get out there and go, wouldn't you rather know who Satan is? And Be friends with him and have dinner with him than have it be like, who's Satan?

Saagar Enjeti (49:01)

Right?

Tim Dillon (49:01)

So he's got to get out there and say, I happen to be friends with Satan. And I want that to be misunderstood. I want it to be destigmatized.

Saagar Enjeti (49:10)

Right.

Ryan Seacrest (49:10)

If Satan could go on the Nelk Boys, maybe they could straighten it out.

Saagar Enjeti (49:13)

That's right, the Dog Boys. That was good. So what do you, what do you think of Tim and I mean, we gotta be a little. Look, I'm not in the business of defending aoc, but like, I wouldn't say that she shut her mouth about Israel. I mean, she said genocide, right? You know, the one thing that we've hit her for here on the show with Ryan is about her vote to fund the Iron Dome. Right? Because I mean her, she had this whole convoluted explanation of defensive act. Yeah, exactly. Look, I mean the part about her, how she was legit in the beginning and has become a tool of Democratic establishment. I think it's totally fair. I don't think it's totally fair to say it's about Israel though, per se. Yeah, that's my only thing. I mean, I don't think he's wrong. I don't think she could be president either specifically for those types of reasons. It's just she did basically get co opted and remember she wanted to be the oversight chairman and she played ball. She shut her mouth about all kinds of stuff. They still wouldn't give it to her.

Krystal Ball (50:02)

Played ball with Pelosi. Pelosi's entire tenure. Those are all fair criticisms of aoc, as is. I mean, basically, at any point, if at any point in your career you have, you rely on donors from the American donor class, you are going to end up coming into contact with people who have close ties to Israel. That's just how it works.

Saagar Enjeti (50:24)

Mac points out the worst thing she did at the DNC was saying that Kamala was working tirelessly versus Mar. That's pretty fair because that was insane. Well, you know, now maybe the Israel thing is making sense to me because when it came, yeah, she put out the words, but. But she actively worked for Kamala to get elected and gave her cover on Gaza, which she did not have to do. Right. And you and I were there. We were at the dnc. You remember all those activists we met? Some of them, they were treated horribly and they were kicked out horribly and all. It's still pretty crazy in retrospect to have experienced that. Ryan and I interviewed a couple of them on the street, who literally were kicked out. Not jokingly.

Krystal Ball (51:02)

It's a great memory of mine, by the way. Just you and Ryan with microphones falling, the hippies around, the dnc.

Saagar Enjeti (51:07)

We did talk.

Krystal Ball (51:08)

We had.

Saagar Enjeti (51:08)

We had a good time.

Krystal Ball (51:08)

It was a blast.

Saagar Enjeti (51:09)

Maybe we'll do it again. But the point is just that that's a fair criticism. But to say that she's been bought off or whatever, I'm not entirely sure that is accurate. On the JD point, though. Here's what's interesting. JD had dinner with Tim very recently, by Tim's own admission. And Tim seems to be truly, like, captured by the Palantir Teal. He went a long time going off on the Antichrist. Like, he's like, why do you need four lectures? One wasn't. It was good. It was funny. I guess I'm just. I'm curious for him. I'm like, so what? Like, who is the good politician? You know, he said some nice things about Marjorie Taylor Greene, which, you know, I mean, okay. I mean, I like some of the things MTG says, definitely. I think she's very courageous in standing up on Israel and a few other issues. But, you know, going with presidential material. I guess the reason why I thought it was important cover is like, where does this podcast thing go? Yeah, right, right. Last Trump was the perfect vehicle for them because he's entertaining, fun to talk to, good stories. You could project whatever you want onto him, even though he's literally been the president before. And you can be like, no, but he's different, you know, this time around. But where does it go from here? Like, to me, it just seems, like, pretty nihilistic, but I really have no idea.

Krystal Ball (52:22)

Well, yeah, this question of who has it or who doesn't is the reason we're asking it in a way that's not like, oh, Al Gore is very charming. Is because we've entered a new, new chapter in media history, which is if you're in Gen Z, you grew up expecting politics to look like reality television through no fault of your own. But because politics started to merge with iPhone, smartphone and social media in a way that it's hard if you're younger to trust people who don't come across well on the popular mediums and smartphones. Smartphone world. So if you can't have a normal conversation. Right. It used to be the sit down at a bar test. Right. But now it's more like sit down on an Instagram live, which, by the way, AOC does a lot of Instagram lives and others don't but that's just because there's something about speaking contemporary or speaking in real time in a way that feels authentic to people. I think that's really what Tim Dillon is talking about with Marjorie Taylor Greene or Thomas Massie is another example. Who, you know, Massey had successfully on Theo Vaughn. Like, that's gotten tons and tons of views. I think the reason is to sound authentic right now, you have to absolutely flame the donor class. You have to be willing in ways that Gavin Newsom is not, in ways that Hakeem Jeffries or these other guys are not. And that's a lesson for aoc, too. That's how she used Instagram and X successfully to take a seat away from Joe Crowley when nobody thought it was possible. Zoram Hamdani did the exact same thing. And it's just about leveraging those mediums in a way that resonates. And that's what I think Tim is saying when he's like, can JD do that?

Saagar Enjeti (54:07)

Well, no. And I think part of the reason why is Trump is the Republican establishment. So how can you be the Republican establishment? You can't be anti establishment and speak out against the.

Krystal Ball (54:14)

Peter Thiel is now the Republican establishment.

Saagar Enjeti (54:16)

Well, it's not. It's. I really. I think the Thiel thing is a proxy for. Whenever he was on Theo Vaughn's podcast and JD Gave it, he was like, well, I take money from a lot of people.

Krystal Ball (54:25)

Yeah.

Saagar Enjeti (54:26)

Theo came out and he's like, yeah, I just thought that was like, some typical political bullshit. And I was like, yeah, I mean, it is kind of a problem. Like, I do get, like, you know, you don't want to talk badly or whatever about friends or people who've donated to you, but, you know, it makes you look bad or. And look, personal loyalty and all that stuff is important, and it is hard. You know, I can even speak from experience. You have to cover people who you literally personally know. It's weird. But at a certain point, like, you have a higher and better calling to your job.

Ryan Seacrest (54:52)

Right.

Saagar Enjeti (54:52)

And just say kind of what you think that is. Seems to be the issue. And part of the reason I think Republicans are really going to struggle post Trump, because you can't say anything that's bad about Trump if he's still alive. It's not possible in the age of cult, maybe.

Krystal Ball (55:05)

Especially if he's not still alive and he's a martyr.

Saagar Enjeti (55:06)

Right? Yeah. Well, I don't know what's harder. I actually think if he's not alive, it's much harder. But. Or, sorry, if he's, if he's alive, it is harder. It's harder because he can literally sit there from. If he wants to. He's never going to leave the political stage. Whereas Democrats, they have no sacred cows anymore. Kamala's done her book excerpt, just came out and she's trashing Biden. Right. It's over. You know that all the Obama, Kamala, Biden worship, et cetera. This is permission to say, I wish more of them would go weapons free. Flame them. You need to.

Krystal Ball (55:35)

Oh yeah.

Saagar Enjeti (55:35)

That's what people want to see.

Krystal Ball (55:36)

Exactly. That's what people want to see. And this is the question about. I actually thought JD did fine in that Theo Vaughan interview. But the problem is the clips, right? If there's a clip that comes out of you, it doesn't matter if the two hours. I mean, it does matter if the two hours is great, but it can be sort of.

Saagar Enjeti (55:50)

You have to be on all the time.

Krystal Ball (55:52)

Yeah, exactly. And I thought. And that means you have to be now. That means you have to be basically like doing reality TV honesty at all time. And that's what politicians need to get used to is saying stuff like, listen, I'm just friends with Peter Thiel, right?

Saagar Enjeti (56:03)

That's right.

Krystal Ball (56:04)

That's the way you have to handle it. But all that is to say we're also in a transition period right now. So there are still people, boomers, whomever voting, probably some elder millennials, for example, who grew up in a different time than Zoomers and And are deeply uncomfortable with voting based on who's going on a podcast and don't like Mamdani. And don't you know that's Mamdani's pulling at what is amazing polling levels for the politics that he brings to the table. But he's still under like 50%, right?

Saagar Enjeti (56:30)

Yeah. People. Somebody asked me, they're like, do you think politics will ever go back to normal? And I was like, I really don't know. Cause look, we did try it under Biden. A lot of people were like, exhale a few. Fresh, fresh air. Let's get Biden in there. He's normal.

Krystal Ball (56:45)

But it was a disaster.

Saagar Enjeti (56:46)

Cuz normal is bad. I've been trying to tell people that my entire political career. Normal is actually way worse than not normal. We need to be very, very not normal. To the extent Trump is bad, it's cuz he's not normal. He's too normal, actually. He's too normal of a normal Republican. Like acting like George W. Bush while he's in office. But just with mean tweets or whatever. So what comes next? I don't know. I mean I could see easy return to. I could see a fighter under Gavin who rhetorically is just like Trump. Rhetorically a fighter. Policy level, like very similar. I can see that happen easily. I believe he's one of the top polls. The alternative is a Trump style figure who comes in and just knocks everything over. I hope for the latter. Maybe I'm not sure if that's even possible anymore. I'd like to think so. I'm not sure.

Krystal Ball (57:30)

But Bernie is actually really good in new media, which people like he crushed the Oban because. Because he's generally honest and he doesn't cover for donors.

Saagar Enjeti (57:40)

I just think he's one of one. I don't see anyone totally same with Trump. I do not see. And that's why I was like maybe it will go back to normal because nobody is as talented as these people.

Krystal Ball (57:48)

I think that's an absolute possibility. Right. And again, it'll always be a tug of war between the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and now the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and maybe like the Ilhan Omars on the left and then the traditional politician. You know, even if the presidency kind of goes back to normal and Washington feels like, you know, it's 1999 again, if that happens, there'll still be a tug of war in the background between the new media stars.

Saagar Enjeti (58:12)

That's true.

Krystal Ball (58:12)

And the old ones.

Saagar Enjeti (58:13)

Well, in a way it's still downstream of our circumstance. We can't go back to 1999 politics. Cuz it's not 1999. 1999 was a great year. S&P 500 was booming. No, 9 11. We had the early days of the optimism. Man. I mean I was so young. I wish I could have been an adult in the year 1999 with my Nokia phone. I mean I've just been cruising like a beeper maybe. What a world to live in and to think about the. What a world to live in and to think about where things could go and then it just all comes crashing down.com and 9 11. I guess that was part of the point. That was part of the. Part of the price that you pay for that moment. But it must have been awesome to live through. I'm genuinely envious.

Krystal Ball (58:54)

You and I share the exact same theory. I think it's possible that civilization peaked in 1999 or 2000.

Saagar Enjeti (59:00)

Oh absolutely. Yeah, 100%. I think that in America, specifically the peak of the American Empire was 1999. All right. There you go. We've given you all of our thoughts. Emily, thank you very much for having me on your show. I appreciate it.

Krystal Ball (59:13)

No, it's true. Yeah, no, it's wonderful. But we haven't given you all of our thoughts because we will still give you the thoughts.

Saagar Enjeti (59:20)

We're doing the ama. Don't worry. Yeah, don't worry. Stick around for that. Thank you guys so much for watching. I'll be on tomorrow with Chris Crystal. We'll see you then.

LG X Boom Advertiser (59:39)

Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra durable LG X Boom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG x boom and for a limited time save 25% at LG.com with code fall25 bring the boom xboom.

WashablesOfAs Advertiser (60:09)

Time for a sofa upgrade. Visit washablesofas.com and discover Annabe where designer style meets budget friendly price prices with sofas starting at $699, Annabe brings you the ultimate in furniture innovation with a modular design that allows you to rearrange your space effortlessly. Perfect for both small and large spaces, Annabe is the only machine washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy. Liquid simply slides right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high resilience foam lets you choose between a sink in feel or a supportive memory foam blend. Plus our pet friendly stain resistant fabrics ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality. For price. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your living space today with no risk returns and a 30 day money back guarantee. Get up to 60% off plus free shipping and free returns. Shop now at washablesofas.com Offers are subject to change. Change and certain restrictions may apply.

Ryan Seacrest (61:09)

Can small acts make a real impact in the world? Sometimes a small thing has the power to become more something big and meaningful. And when it comes to helping children, no act is too small. When you fill up at the Purple Giving Pump at Shell, a portion of your purchase will be donated to support charities in your community. The Giving Pump Easy to stop, Easy to donate from 9125 to Don at 103125 participating Shell stations will donate a minimum of $0.01 per gallon of the fuel pump from the Giving Pump or a minimum donation of $300.

Krystal Ball (61:39)

This is an I Heart Pod.