Transcript
A (0:01)
Welcome to breakpoint, a daily look at an ever changing culture through the lens of unchanging truth. For the Colson Center, I'm John Stonestreet. In a sermon clip that was posted last week on X, US Senate hopeful James Tallarico said this in the Gospel of Thomas, which was later omitted from the Bible by church officials, the Gospel of Thomas quotes Jesus as saying, when you make the male and female one and the same, when the male is not male and the female is not female, then you will enter the kingdom of God. End quote. Now what he's offering here is what might be called a zombie argument. It's a claim which, like monsters in movies, keeps getting up and shambling around no matter how many times they're killed. Other examples of zombie arguments include calling an unborn child just a clump of cells, though sonograms and ultrasounds have shown for years it's not true. Or that the same sex attracted are born this way, when even advocates of the movement abandoned that slogan years ago. In truth, most scholars have never considered the Gospel of Thomas as being on par with the actual Gospels. And yet those seeking a feminist revisioning of Christianity continued to claim it as a legitimate source of what Christians believed before it was suppressed by the authorities. The truth is, if we borrowed Voltaire's quip about the Holy Roman Empire, the Gospel of Thomas is neither a gospel nor of Thomas, nor is it scripture. It's also neither Christian nor feminist. First, despite Tallarico's claim that the Gospel of Thomas was kicked out of the Bible, it just isn't so. In fact, it was never in the Bible in the first place. It's a second century document which, despite being named after an apostle, was written by people who never knew Jesus, nor even by a friend of a friend of him. As someone commented on X, this is like a fan fiction of Jane Austen written today, being described as kicked out of the Austin canon centuries from now. Nor is the Gospel of Thomas a Christian document. The the Gospel of Thomas was discovered in the 20th century in Egypt as part of an ancient library of Gnostic sources. Though Gnosticism borrowed Christian, Jewish and pagan terms and concepts, it was its own religion with diverse beliefs. Gnosticism comes from the Greek word gnosis, which means knowledge. The basic idea is that the physical world is an illusion or even evil. Some strands even describe creation as the result of an abortion of a higher being. Salvation is acquired by rejecting the material world and securing the secret inner knowledge. And from the very beginning of the church. For these reasons, and for many others, Gnosticism was condemned as heresy. It's also odd for those hoping to advance feminist ideas to appeal to the Gospel of Thomas. From Dan Brown and the Da Vinci Code a generation ago to Talarico today, the Gospel of Thomas is often portrayed as an alternative, more feminine friendly source about Christian. But in line 114 of the gospel of Thomas, it quotes Peter asking Jesus to send Mary away, for women are not worthy of life and unlike the Jesus of the Gospel, Thomas version of Christ does not affirm her worth, instead promises to give her an upgrade. Quote look, I will draw her in so as to make her male, so that she too may become a living male spirit similar to you. But I say to you, every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven. In other words, the context for this notion of erasing male and female is flatly misogynist. While it's puzzling that critics of Christianity continue to resurrect this zombie gospel, Dr. Glenn Sunshine has noted that people like Talarico who attend theologically liberal seminaries never read conservative books. They simply do not know that their institutionalized reinterpretations of the faith have been thoroughly rejected. Because the Bible affirms the beauty and the goodness of God's creation, so does Christianity, and that includes the creation of his image bearers both as male and female. Contrary to the Gospel of Thomas, women do not need to become men in order to be saved, and if they did, well, that certainly would not be good news for the Colson Center. I'm John Stonestreet with Breakpoint. Today's Breakpoint was co authored by Dr. Timothy Padgett. If you're a fan of Breakpoint, leave us a review on your favorite podcast app. And for more resources or to share this commentary with others, go to breakpoint.org
