Transcript
Ann Berry (0:01)
Hear that?
State Street Investment Management Advertiser (0:02)
That's me in Tokyo learning to make sushi from a master. How did I get here? I invested wisely. Now the only thing I worry about is using too much wasabi. Get where you're going with spy, the world's most traded etf. Getting there starts here with State Street Investment Management.
State Street Investment Management Legal Disclaimer (0:17)
Before investing, consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Visit state street.comim for prospectus containing this and other information. Read it carefully. SPY Subject to risks similar to those of stocks all ETFs are subject to risk, including possible loss of principal Alps Distributors Inc.
Ann Berry (0:29)
Distributor in the race to monetize AI, we survey recent industry moves towards advertising and away from chatbot Commerce. Live Nation settles its antitrust case with the doj. We look at what's next for the company's concert sales platform, Ticketmaster and Robinhood expanding beyond trading with a venture fund composed of multiple glamorous tech names. Yet its launch was met with a bit of a lukewarm reception. We'll dive into why for Monday, March 9, it's Brew Markets Daily and I'm Ann Berry. More market details to come, but first I'm often asked what I think of investing in startups, and I'm pretty emphatic in my answer, although it's not always a popular one. So just for some context, I'm all for democratizing access to asset classes and the startup world is a tough one to crack. That's because venture funds that lead the charge investing in the most successful startups have been available only to institutions or high net net worth individuals. Some of the most well known startups have grown well beyond the early stages to just massive private companies held by massive VC funds like Stripe. Then there's the pitfalls of angel investing, where someone puts their savings directly into a young company. Now there's no diversification here, which is what you would get with a fund of startups. And startups, particularly when you invest on a case by case basis, have an exceptionally high failure rate, somewhere in the high 90%. So I answer on should people invest in startups? Is as follows. Only do it with money that you can really, and I mean really afford to lose meaning after investing in stocks and bonds, real estate, other assets, the kinds of which we talk about here on the show. So if you're going to do it, do it as part of a balanced portfolio. Now all of this reasoning and all of this context is why Robinhood's IPO of its Robinhood Ventures Fund one on the New York Stock Exchange that was on Friday caught my eye while trading under the ticker rvi. The fund holds stakes in scaled young private companies and these are Stripe Databricks, Ramp, Revolut, Air Wallix, Aura, Merkor and Boom. All glamorous glitzy tech names, Several of whose IPOs have now been long awaited by retail investors. So this fund looked like it had the makings of the darling access to these businesses while they're still private, but with the attractive liquidity of public equities in which to get that access. Despite that, the fund stock dropped 16% on Friday. And while it did rebound nearly 8% today, the sort of lukewarm reception is pretty noticeable. And it contrasts a previous attempt to give individual investors exposure to the glitzy startup world. If we go back to March 2024, there was a fund, Destiny Tech 100 ticker DXYZ which IPO'd on the new York Stock Exchange through direct listing. It was a publicly traded closed end fund holding stakes in 100 venture backed companies including SpaceX, OpenAI and Discord. Well in that debut, the shares surged from a reference price of just about $4.80 to an opening trade of 8 bucks 25 and it closed even higher at $9. So really not bad for a first day's work. And when you take a look at that stock, Destiny Tech 100 has continued to climb since then, now trading at around 26 bucks a share and a 30ish percent premium to the value of its underlying holdings. Although frankly those values, the underlying holdings still being public, are still pre really difficult to gauge with accuracy. So this all begs the question, why has RVI not seen a euphoric welcome after offering the access that retail investors have been clamoring for? And with the halo behind it of Robin Hood, it's such a popular retail investment platform. Well, this is just one person's view. This is my own take on this. First of all, this particular fund actually doesn't hold stakes in the companies most widely expected to go public at enormous valuations in the near term. So it doesn't have OpenAI or Anthropic or SpaceX, whichever everyone's waiting for this year. Second of all, this particular fund isn't really well diversified. There's only seven companies in there compared to 100 in that other competitor, plus a bunch of cash in this fund. So I did nerd out. I went to the prospectus that was filed with the SEC for this IPO and it actually lists the fair value of that pretty limited seven company portfolio of about $282 million in value. Now most of the stakes listed and you can see the acquisition date were bought pretty recently, just within the last few months, suggesting that the valuations are pretty up to date. And so at least for now, there's no need for the fund to trade beyond the $660 million IPO raise that we saw last week, if at all. And then third of all, there is just a fundamental re underwriting of tech valuations going on right now in full throttle, partly driven by the software sell off which happened since the start of the year, and partly as war in the Middle east raises the specter of oil driven inflation and global instability. And it's moments like this that are forc mechanisms for the markets to more carefully determine how to allocate incremental risk. But if one of the RVI portfolio companies goes public and gets real cash because cash is king or cash is queen gets cash back to shareholders quickly, in just one person's view, I suspect that sentiment will possibly snap upwards. Coming on up, the race to monetize AI will look at what's working and what's not and how it might just impact your chatbot conversations. And from lawsuits to partnerships, Novo Nordisk is set to work with him and hers, a company it had previously sued. We'll look at the market reaction, but first a word from our sponsor, Charles Schwab. Trading at Schwab is powered by Ameritrade, unlocking the power of thinkorswim the award winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. You can visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools all while you
