Transcript
Ariana Grande (0:00)
Hi, I'm Ariana Grande. Hi, I'm Cynthia Erivo and you're listening.
Cynthia Erivo (0:03)
To the Broadway Podcast Network. Visit VPN FM to discover more.
Alan (0:13)
Hey there, you passionate podcast listener. This is Alan from Broadway Podcast Network, dropping in real fast to make sure you know that the network has a full day of live podcast panels already scheduled for Saturday, February 8th, as part of this year's BroadwayCon. It's also the 10th anniversary of BroadwayCon itself. So in addition to BBC events, there are some additional amazing events planned. All you need is a one ticket, which gets you into all three days of BroadwayCon here in New York City. And if you haven't purchased a ticket already, head over to broadwaycon.com and use code BPN for 15% off your ticket. That's broadwaycon.com using code BPN for 15% off. And you can even visit BPN FM broadwaycon to see our confirmed schedule of events. Hope to see you there.
Cynthia Erivo (1:04)
This episode is brought to you by Paramount. Gladiator 2 is now streaming on Paramount. Rated R. Years after the death of Maximus, Lucius is forced into the Colosseum after his home is conquered by tyrannical twin Roman emperors. With the future of the empire at stake, he must find strength and honor to return the glory of Rome to its people. Gladiator 2 now streaming on paramountplus.com.
Ariana Grande (1:32)
Thank you very much.
Cynthia Erivo (1:33)
That's all.
Ariana Grande (1:34)
But we have a great dramatic finish. Oh, I'm sure you do, but Mr. Grant, hit it.
Cynthia Erivo (1:42)
Broadway, Broadway. We've missed it. So we're leaving soon and taking June to star her in a show. White lies, white lies, Rhythm and romance. The train is late, so while we wait, we're gonna do a little dance.
Ariana Grande (2:08)
Hello all you theater lovers both out and proud and on the DL. And welcome back to Broadway Breakdown, a podcast discussing the history und legacy of American theater's most exclusive address, Broadway. I am your host, Matt Koplik, the least famous and most opinionated of all the Broadway podcast host hosts. And we are doing a little bit of a review jumble of things current and past, because why the fuck not, you know, just do the things that give you joy. This is going to be a day late because due to the headlining production that we will be reviewing that is currently playing on Broadway, we cannot release this episode until like after 9pm on Thursday the 23rd. So apologies for this showing up Friday morning instead of Thursday morning, but everything is out of whack. We do what we do. We are going to be talking about four things today. We're going to be talking about all in Comedy of Love. I think that's the subtitle Comedy about Love. I'm going to do a little retrospective on Teeth that just closed at New World Stages after a limited run at Playwrights Horizons. I'm going to talk a little bit about a work in development that I saw Telemachos as well as the new play to open on Broadway, the Pulitzer Prize winning English. We'll see how we do. I know I teased last week a little bit about possibly this week being the Come From Away episode. Come From Away is coming. It has been recorded. I'm just lazy and I have to do some editing on it and I don't like editing as you all know because of the length of these episodes. So just, you know, that is happening. I'm not actually lying to you. I'm just putting it off and putting it off. Other quick bit of information before we continue. In typical fashion when David J. Lynch and I do a way too early predictions episode, the Tony eligibility committee or whatever their fucking name is dropped eligibility rulings the very next day and a lot of things that we had discussed did come to fruition and then a lot of things that we had said productions were petitioning did not come to fruition. I know I said last week that the producers of Death Becomes her were petitioning for Jennifer Simard to go into featured instead of lead. Same thing with the producers of maybe happy ending for Helen J. Shen. That is what they were trying to do. The Tony Awards ultimately rejected that. So that makes featured actress in a musical far more interesting because we now have two giant nominations out of there and it makes leading actress in a musical interesting because it's ultimately a cage match of like eight or nine contenders. So we'll see how all that goes. The biggest news from that for me, like the biggest surprise was was the announcement that Eureka Day was going to be considered a revival that I don't fully understand. As far as I'm aware it has never been performed in New York City. The show is also six and a half years old at this point. I don't even think it's been licensed yet. I don't know how it was able to get that. But hey, it shakes things up a little bit. We add it now to the revival of a play contenders and we'll do another predictions episode probably in a month and and you know, discuss things further there. But it definitely shakes that race up a little bit. Not that it'll win necessarily, but it could be almost guaranteed a nomination. I Think one could say that Yellowface and Eureka Day are very strong nominees. And then if Glengarry Glen Ross and Othello are giant shit shows, who's to say what else gets nominated? Who's to say what even wins? So, yeah, that's really it. And then when they announced that Gray Henson was eligible for leading actor, that leads me to believe that the whole production is eligible for nominations. Gray was the only thing announced because he, I believe, was under the title. And that is sort of how these things work. People are asking on the Discord Channel, which, if you haven't joined yet, now's the time. But people were asking on the Discord channel, you know, when they didn't announce anything about Jennifer Simard or Helen J. Shen, or when they announced something about Helen J. Shen but not Jennifer Simard, did that mean that Jen was going to go into feature? Did that mean they were still figuring it out? Basically, they only make announcements if they go against opening night billing. And the producers of maybe Happy Ending had put Helen J. Shen below the title on opening night and Death Becomes her had put Jennifer Smart above the title, as well as Chris Seber and Michelle Williams, which is why the Tony committee announced that Michelle Williams and Chris Sieber were going to be featured because that is opposite of what their billing would state and that Helen J. Shen would go into lead because that is the opposite of what her billing would state. So that is something to consider when you are looking at Tony rulings. If there's something that you're hoping to read that isn't there, go to the opening night credits of the show you're thinking about and that'll give you a better idea. Same thing with John Gallagher Jr. For Swept Away, which we said, you know, he was more likely than not going to be considered lead. And he is, even though he's not above the title. But he is the central character of that story. Which does lead me to wonder if Natalie Venetia Belcon will be considered lead for Buena Vista Social Club. As I said in the predictions episode, the person I know on the team for that said that her character is the center of the story, even if the show is mostly an ensemble piece. And that sometimes is enough for Tonys to go, no, they're the lead, you know, same way they go, eh? You know, Eureka Day. She. She a revival. Anywho, moving on from there, I'm gonna start with Teeth because it is recently closed and I know it has a lot of passionate fans on here. There are people on Instagram and on The Discord Channel asking me to talk about Teeth. I had seen it at Playwrights Horizons and then saw it right before it closed at New World Stages. Teeth, of course, is the new musical by Michael R. Jackson and Anna K. Jacobs. It is based on the movie Teeth that came out, I want to say, in like 2004 or 5, by Mitchell Lichtenstein. I'm gonna actually look up this exact 2007. The movie came out in 2007, I believe. It's written and directed by Mitchell Lichtenstein. I didn't see the movie when it came out, but I had heard about it. It was one of those things where camp, knowing camp, had not really entered mainstream just yet. This is like two years prior to Drag Race, and most of the country had not really understood what dark horror satire was meant to be. And from everything that I read about the movie, everyone was like, this is the most ridiculous premise. Why would they think they could get away with this? This is insane. And from everything I was told to understand, the movie acknowledges that and is aware of that. And that's sort of the point. So the musical version, as I said, adapted by Michael R. Jackson and Anna K. Jacobs, opened last March at Playwrights Horizons and was already like an immediate sellout because Michael R. Jackson had premiered Strange Loop at Playwrights Horizons, where it won the Pulitzer and then transferred to Broadway, where it won the Tony. And this was pretty soon after White Girl in Danger, which also was a major sellout at Second Stage, but ultimately was considered a letdown. This had the benefit of being a movie that some people knew of, once again being a Michael R. Jackson product and being at the last non profit where he had major success. So there was a lot of anticipation for this musical. I saw it at Playwrights Horizons and I thought it was pretty good. I thought it was definitely funny. I thought the music was catchy, very sharp lyrics. I think Michael R. Jackson is a very, very good lyricist. And, you know, he did not do the music for this. He co wrote the book with Anna K. Jacobs and Jacobs wrote the score. And I did think that the music was very catchy at the time. I thought the cast overall was very strong. Stephen Pasquale was still in the production at that point, and I was very impressed with him because I had never seen Stephen Fosqual to be funny before, and I thought he was very funny in this. The lead, of course, was played by Elise Alan Lewis. Louise Louis. I think it's Elise Alan Lewis. She plays a character named Dawn O'Keefe. And dawn is in a community called Eden. It's a town called Eden, and their community is deeply religious. Her stepfather, who was Steve Pasquale at Playwrights Horizons and Andy Karl at New World Stages, he is the town pastor. Her stepbrother Brad, played by Will Connolly, is basically this very angry incel who has deep resentment towards Don as well as fear and hatred of his father. His father definitely plays favorites, and he favors dawn even though she is his stepdaughter. He clearly favors her over his own son. Dawn is part of a group of young women in the church called the Promise Keeper Girls, and they are meant to hold each other accountable for their religious beliefs and their chastity. You know, very. A lot of talk about virginity and purity and innocence, and that all would be well and good if Don didn't have a boyfriend played by Jason Gauthay, who she definitely is kind of having these confused feelings sexually about him. She pretty much wants to have sex with him, but her faith and her community is telling her no. And her boyfriend Toby is kind of. He's not. Not coercing her into sex. Like, it's more that he recognizes that she is horny as well. And because he thinks that she is so pure and perfect, it makes him want her more and fans the flames of her desire. He does not tell her, we shouldn't be doing this. He sort of. There's what he says and there's what he does. He says, we shouldn't be doing this, and then keeps making her horny while this is all happening. Brad is part of an online community called the Truth Seekers, and these are men who feel like society is rejecting them, that the world is trying to dismantle the patriarchy, and that women are out to get them. Very timely. And on top of all of this, Brad informs us that dawn has teeth in her vagina, a fact that he's been sure of since they were children, when there was an incident when dawn was about 6 and Brad was, let's say, 7 or 8, and no one ever believed him, but he knows what he saw or felt, and he's basically. In addition to his resent for how his father treats her over him, he has resentment over this as well. And without going too much into specifics, I'll say in her first sexual encounter with Toby, that starts off consensual and then turns into assault pretty quickly. The idea of consent is a major theme of teeth, of what it is to actually be with someone and to be a. An ally of women. You know, there's what I said this about Toby already, but, like, there's what you say and then there's what you do, and teeth is very big about what people say and then what they do. And just because, you know, Don wants to be with Toby, both, you know, his wife and sexually, doesn't mean that she wants to, you know, be with him sexually. Exactly. At the same time that he wants to be with her sexually, or even if she does and she changes her mind halfway through, he. He needs to respect that. And by not respecting Don, that is when Toby falls victim to teeth, to Dentata, one might say. And dawn is unaware that she has this in her body. When it happens, she's sort of thrown and completely in shock. And then only throughout the second half of the show does she realize what is happening with her. And she needs two more. She has two more encounters that sort of help her realize what exactly is going on with her. When she. When she kills Toby, she tries to go into hiding. And then she goes to a doctor in a neighboring town, also played by Andy Carl, Steve Pasquale, and he, you know, he's a gynecologist who assaults her during her exam, which then, of course, causes her. It's so weird to talk about this, like, in a critical way and not make people just go, oh, God, but the teeth in her vagina chop off the doctor's hand. And then there's a gay character who is trying to, you know, become born again, and he wants to prove that he can be with a woman, and she needs to prove that she can actually enjoy sex, and they have a sexual encounter, and it's actually quite great. But then, as it turns out, he films the whole thing and livestreamed it because he wants to prove to the community that he can be straight. And he also says, I'm giving you an alibi here. I'm doing this for the two of us. But he does not ask for her consent. So even though the sex itself was consensual, the act of filming her was not. And when he does not understand the weight of his actions, of course, he then falls victim to Dentata. And it all culminates in a giant showdown between Don and Brad. The girls versus the boys even. And the whole show kind of builds to this apocalyptic climax. The set starts to fall apart. There's fire everywhere. All of the women of the cast are in. How would I describe it? If you look up Sutton Foster and anything goes, the costume she wears for Blow, Gabriel Blow, is sort of like the Off Broadway weirder sister of that costume so, like a lot of fiery red and, you know, skirt situations and capes and glitter and very. It's sort of meant to invoke that these young women are channeling their inner Dentata goddesses. And when the show ends, dawn is sort of at the top of the apocalyptic heap and ruling the. Not the. Not the whole human race, but the corner of the human race that she resides in, as the women and their subservient men go out and sort of bring balance to the whole with their teeth. Now, if that sounds like a weird show to you, I want to once again remind you this is a Michael R. Jackson show and remind you that it's based off of a campy mid 2000s horror movie. The show is very much meant to be funny. It is. Even when things get, quote unquote, scary and, you know, sexual assaulty, there is a wink to all of it, especially because the men who perpetrate Don's body meet a very gruesome end and a very over the top end. There's been a lot of talk in this show about having a splash section that the first couple of rows you're given ponchos in case of any blood getting on you. From what I understand, this was something that started at Playwrights and then moved to New World Stages and then kind of grew from there. I don't think there was a plan to have a splash section so much as that blood sometimes would get into the audience. And as a way to cover their asses, producers created the idea of a splash section just in case blood got out in any audience members. And then more blood was added when it moved to New World Stages. And because people were aware that there was a splash section, actors got a little more crazy with props and with blood. And so it definitely went beyond the first two or three rows, but it never went, like, past the fifth row, I would say. And we were talking up to row nine or ten. The night I saw it, that had ponchos. And I was like, okay, if you're in the 10th row, you are in absolutely no danger. Just warning. The differences between Playwrights Horizons and New World Stages. For me, one is that, first of all, the casting, the majority of the cast is the same, as I said, except for Andy Karl, who replaced Stephen Pasquale. I would say that Andy Carl definitely leaned more into the camp vibe, whereas Steve Pasquale leaned into the satirical vibe. I would say that I preferred Pasquale as the pastor and I preferred Andy Karl as the Doctor. The Doctor has a number, I think, it's called Girls like youe and it's sort of like wonderful from Wicked with like a Kurt Vile Brechtian spin on it that ultimately meets a bloody conclusion. And, you know, Carl absolutely plays it up. He's silly, he's quirky, and then definitely get. Gets sinister when the song calls for it. As the pastor, he's a little more ridiculous. And I think that adds to the fun vibes that the show provides. With Pasquale, it was a bit more of a commentary. He was still funny as the pastor, but he. Because Pasquale is such a. I can only describe it as like he has a dark energy on stage. Not that he's necessarily mean or evil, but that when he's on stage, he's always kind of the heavy. You never really cast him to be the clown. And if he's the clown, he's got to be a very specific kind of clown. Like he was in Here We Are. He was a very self serious Lothario. You would never, like, cast him to be Adolfo in drowsy chaperone. Right. So when he was playing the pastor in Teeth, his character took it all so seriously that when he honestly goes towards the ridiculous, you know, wearing ninja attire and fancying himself like a secret agent in disguise, it was hilarious, honestly, because he was so, you know, into it. Whereas with Andy Karl, it was a bit more of a cartoon and it still worked. It was very funny. It just. Some of the hardened edges that the character had and that the tone of the show had at Playwrights definitely got a bit softened for New World. And I do think overall that is for the better, even if it made that part of the show a little less interesting to me. Fascinatingly enough, there are a lot of changes that kept the show pretty much at the same length at New World that it was at Playwrights Horizons. The whole show ended up still being about an hour and 50, hour and 55, even though I know for a fact that they did a lot of trimming in the first half of the show. According to my friends who worked on it, the first half definitely had a lot of tightening to get to certain major plot points faster, but then certain things in the second act were fleshed out better. So the show still remained the same length despite all these cuts. But I appreciated that because one of the things I felt at Playwrights Horizons was that it took a very long time for us to get to the first Dentada scene, which was Don and Toby at the pond or the lake or whatever the fuck it is. And ultimately, for a show called Teeth, where many people in the audience know the premise, they're waiting for that scene because it's ultimately the catalyst that launches the rest of the story. And it was probably like an hour, maybe a little over that when we finally got to that scene at Playwrights. And I want to say we got to it about the 45 minute mark at New World Stages, which doesn't sound like a huge difference. But in a musical, every minute is precious. So like 15 minutes is basically a football field of time. And just getting to all of the necessary preamble earlier and getting through it faster allows the audience to enjoy the ride more and to be more on the edge of their seat for the beginning to get to the big moments. Right? Because if you're waiting for that first Dentata scene and it happens, then it becomes, okay, when's it going to happen again? How's it going to happen again? And you're willing to be a little more patient to see it again now that you've gotten your money's worth. The first time you're like, okay, let the rest of the chips fall as they may. But to make an audience wait so long for the first one is a bit not naive, it just is asking a bit much of audiences, especially audiences now that have shorter attention spans and, you know, are not. They're both more willing to lean into what you're doing because they want to justify the tickets that they paid for, but also less willing because they'll. They will interpret things on bad faith alone. So if you keep them engaged, they are less willing to do, honestly, really crappy analytics on your show. So that was one of the major changes I appreciated was that they got the first half of the story moving a lot faster and got to all the points we needed to a lot quicker. So that way the second half of the show, even though, yes, it was longer and a little more in depth, it didn't feel as much of a slog as it could have. I will say normally on this podcast and when I used to write reviews on Instagram, I would talk about the shows that didn't know that they needed to be 90 minutes and instead were two act musicals shows like, or even 80 minute musicals shows like Heart of Rock and Roll, which I still think should be 100 minutes, no intermission, once Upon a One More Time, which would absolutely be 85 minutes no intermission. And Teeth might be the first show I've seen in a while where I actually think it would benefit being a two act Musical. Now, there's a lot of reasons it's not a two act musical. The premise alone. You want to keep audiences in the theater as long as possible. You want to keep people from walking out as much as possible. And an intermission absolutely allows people who are on the fence to walk out. But I do think that the intermission would allow the second act to feel a lot faster than it probably is. Because as I was watching the show as we got into the second half, the post Toby Death, I guess, spoiler alert, I guess. But I feel like I already mentioned that when we got into the show post Toby Death, there's nothing necessarily that I would have cut or even trimmed, but I was starting to feel the length of the evening as we got closer to the finale. And I don't think that would have been so much of a problem if we had had a 10 to 15 minute break in between. Even if it was a 50 minute second act, it would feel even tighter than had we not had it. It's just sometimes when you get a little bit of respite, the last mile on your run can go by in a flash and just be all that easier to complete. So that's more of a technical thing on my end. Narratively speaking, they don't necessarily need it. The show kind of always worked as it did. I know a lot of people who saw the show felt like that it was given an unfair shot at commercialism. We are in this era where people are talking about the rebirth of Off Broadway and it being a commercially viable entity. And it is. We had Omar do so well Off Broadway and then transfer to Broadway where it's continued to do really well. Little Shop of Horrors remains a huge cash cow at west side Theater. And Titanique is still running. And then something like Teeth only really manages about a three month run. Something like Big Gay Jamboree only really managed a two to three month run. Big Gay Jamboree I've already talked about on this podcast. I don't think that show was ready for the big time. I also think that their desire to move that show to Broadway, which I know for a fact was their hope it was ill, was misguided in my personal opinion. That was a show with a lot of interesting ideas and a lot of good bits and a lot of beautiful design in it, but the bones just were not there yet. Teeth. The bones are there. It works. It's absolutely an Off Broadway musical. The intel I have with Teeth ultimately is that it is too expensive a show to run off Broadway. The Financial model just did not make sense. They needed it to sell at, like, 90% or 95% capacity at every performance in order to just, like, break even. And when you are running an Off Broadway musical called Teeth, we're like, yes, one of your writers has a major following, but Michael R. Jackson is still. He's not new on the scene. He's been around for a while, but he's new to major Broadway audiences. In the most recent couple of years, he does not have, like 100, 200,000 fan following that could sell out New World Stages for nine months straight. You have to think rationally and go, okay, what's the best way we can put this show up and, you know, make it sell at either, you know, 80% capacity at discounted rates or 65% capacity at full price? Because the audience for Teeth is there. But due to the World, a lot of young theatergoers do not have the resources to see Broadway and Off Broadway shows constantly at full price. They go for discounts, they go for rush, they go for lottery, because they love it. But they can't spend 90 to $150 once a week or twice a week or once every other week to do this. They need to buy groceries. They need to pay their rent. They need to pay their utility bills. They'll look for the $40 ticket and happily go. And they'll tell all their friends. But if you need 200 to 300 seats to be paying 150 bucks every time for a show like this, you got to rethink how you're going to do it. And it's easier for me to say this as a backseat driver, right? I'm not on the producing team. I don't know if these options were thought about, but it's less that the audiences weren't showing up for Teeth and more that Teeth just could not last very long in the structure that it had set for itself. Which is a shame. But I do hope that other theater companies across the country will look into doing it. I think the cast album is out now. If it is, please give it a listen. If it hasn't come out yet, wait for it. It is a very good score. It's just a very delightfully weird, slightly horror, slightly campy, slightly feminist musical that I think a lot of people will probably dislike. But it will have its fans, and the fans that it does have will be committed to it probably forever. There's a lot of endorphins that you get when a show is absolutely in your wheelhouse. When it just checks off every box for you and you just keep coming back to it over and over and over again. I have a friend who actually it's friend of the pod, Etai Benson, who you might remember from the downstate episode. He's a huge movie buff and we were sort of talking about all the possible Oscar movies. And I was asking him, which I should see next, and he said the Brutalist. And I really liked the Brutalist, but he loved the Brutalist. And he admitted that it's basically like everything that movie does checks off every box for him of what he loves about movies. So he's seen it three times now, and I'm like, I'll probably see it once more in my lifetime. It's just good as it is. It is not a movie that does everything that I love, but I feel like with something like Teeth, because it is so specific, there's absolutely, you know, 200,000 people out there that this musical fully just nails for them. And they will be the die hard Dentata fans forever and always. That's all I really got to say about Teeth. I've been talking for like 25 minutes. I want to say about it, 24 minutes. If you have any questions about it, if you want to, you know, get my opinion on things that I maybe didn't mention so much, I highly recommend that you join the Discord Channel. The link will be in the description box for this episode and you can ask me in the Topics and questions page of the Discord Channel. I know that a lot of you on there already wanted me to talk about it. I hope I covered as much as you wanted me to. If not again, just ask me on the Discord Channel. That would be great. Moving on, let's do a quick blurb about all in and then we'll take a break and then we'll go to our last two. So All In Comedy About Love opened right before Christmas with a cast of John Mulaney, Fred Armisen, Renee Lees Goldsberry and Richard Kind, with the band the Bangsons performing songs intermittently. It's directed by Alex Timbers and it is written by Simon Rich, who is the son of Frank Rich. Honestly, my favorite New York Times theater critic. If you haven't read much about All In, I'll just say this to you. There's a lot of discussion of, you know, what exactly is this All In? Comedy About Love? Especially, you know, how could this thing get put up so quickly? And then how can the cast be rotating in and out so much? What kind of show is this, because everyone that I listed just now is no longer in the show. The current cast is Lin Manuel Miranda AD Bryant, Nick Kroll and Andrew Rannells and. And then Annaleigh Ashford, Hank Azaria, David Cross, Jimmy Fallon, they all come in after that. Tim Meadows comes in. I think towards the very, very end. This is not a play. This is a collection of short stories written by Simon Rich with the theme of love. And they're comedic short stories. And ultimately it is a 90 minute evening or afternoon with the four performers sitting in chairs with scripts in their laps, narrating and acting out these stories again, with songs by the Bengsons performed in between. And Alex Timbers and his team have done their darndest to spruce it up a bit, give it some very fun lighting to add projections to the show. So for every story that is recited to us, we get a visual aid for it all. But ultimately, this is not a play. It's not even really a TED Talk. It is story time for adults. It is everyone having fun with their characters, but not really having much beyond it. I'm not going to talk about the financial situation of the show, the ticket pricing for what is ultimately four people in chairs. That has already been discussed by critics. You can discuss it amongst yourselves if you'd like. I already kind of think the show is basically highway robbery. But if people just want to see the actors they like on stage, far be it for me to tell them how to spend their money. But I think my biggest issue with this production is while they continually have people in it who are very delightful stage presences. John Mulaney in particular, I found to be, you know, very charming and selling the material as much as possible. There's not much to these stories. I didn't find them hilarious. They were at times funny. They were not, like, you know, painfully unfunny. I would watch it and I would go, that was clever. A couple of things made me chuckle. Fewer things made me actually laugh. Of the 90 minutes I spent there, I would say that I laughed a total of like five minutes sprinkled throughout. Maybe even less than that. The stories all have the common theme of love. Different kinds of love, romantic love, parental love, sibling love. And there's. There's no real sustenance to them. And I don't mean that like they have. Oh, they need to have a deeper meaning. I just mean, like, it's these situations in the story that, like, would make a fun SNL sketch. A talent agent who's sort of in his older age Fends off Death from coming to his door by ultimately signing Death as a client and promising Death that they can, you know, be a star in the entertainment industry. And he gets to live a bit longer, you know, at home with his wife. That is cute. It's a nice, fun premise, but it doesn't really go anywhere. The punch lines aren't all that strong. There's a moment in it that is. There's, like, one line in particular that I found funny. And there's a speech that Fred Armisen gives as Death that I chuckled because it was accurate in how a lot of actors talk about their, you know, school days with acting. But it's not this, like, laugh out loud, oh, my God. Punchline after punchline after punchline kind of story. There's another one about the Elephant man and the doctor who's treating the Elephant man and his strained relationship with his wife and how the Elephant man basically seduces this doctor's wife and ultimately brings him, the doctor and his wife closer together because of the affair. There are pirates who are out to sea and find a young girl as a stowaway who's like, maybe two or three, and they ultimately decide to keep her and raise her, and they become, you know, still pirates, but parents. They're pirates and their parents and the love they have for the girl. And then there's a detective story, but it's a baby detective and his even younger baby sister and what's going on with the missing stuffed doll that she has and things like that. And as I said, it's clever, it's cute. Sometimes it's like, chuckle worthy funny, but it's overall not really substantive in any way. It's not hilarious and it's not deep. It doesn't make you think differently about love. It doesn't even really warm your heart about love. It's just sort of like, okay, that was cute. That was nice. As I said, it definitely gives you an appreciation for John Mulaney as a performer and just as a presence. I'm assuming that either Lin Manuel Miranda or Andrew Reynolds is currently doing the John Mulaney stuff now with the new cast, but I rightfully couldn't say. I also don't know if it's dispersed the same way with each new cast member as it was this time. When I saw it with the original four, John Mullini definitely had the heavy lifting. He had the majority of the work. He did the opening monologue. He then was the lead of two separate stories, Richard Kind and the narrator of a third story that Richard kind technically was the lead of, but not really. Fred Armisen was sort of a featured player in three of the stories, and then Renee Elise Goldsberry was a cameo performer for two stories and then had the closing monologue. It was very much heavily loaded towards Mulaney. There's not much else I can really say about this. This is not something that offended me as a piece of art. Maybe it offends me a bit in terms of the pricing, but again, we're not going to go into that. It's just this. The whole thing is just sort of there. And it's possible that, you know, the theater was available for this amount of time. The actors were all available, and the production team was all available. It's hard not to think a little bit of it as a. As a, you know, cash grab, but with theater, it's really hard to make a lot of money in a short period of time. So it's hard to really gauge how this came about and why this came about. It's. It's. It's. You know, it's sold well, but it's a big nothing, in my opinion. Like, it's gonna close in about two weeks, and we're gonna forget about it. We're gonna forget about it so soon. And that's why I'm not really gonna talk about it much more after this and not talk about it for very long at all. It's. Yeah, it's a. This was just a giant. What. I saw it to try to complete my viewing of everything that was on Broadway this season. We'll see how well I do with that at the end. But so far, we're up to date, and it is, technically speaking, Tony eligible. I would not nominate it for anything. Biggest thing I would say, like, gun to my head would be Mulaney. Maybe the lighting, which is such, you know, that Liz Lemon and 30 Rock ISM. The lighting was really neat. The programs were really easy to read. You know, like, this wasn't a disaster of a day to see it. It was just. I walked out and I went, okay, well, that happened. And that's all I really got to say about all. Any comedy about love. So we will take a quick break, and then I will go talk about. Actually, what I'm going to do is I'm going to talk about English next. I'm going to do my review of English. And then after English, I'm going to talk about Telemachos. So sit tight and let's take a break.
