The Bills PROBLEM with the 'TUSH PUSH', James Cook CONTRACT SAGA continues and CB draft PROSPECTS - Buffalo Plus: A Buffalo Bills podcast

Transcript

A (0:00)

Your point is so legitimate.

B (0:02)

Well, I know it's a bad point, but I'm just like, it makes no sense to me. This is something that is advantageous for your team and you say it's player safety, but then when you look at what the data backs up, it doesn't back up your claim.

C (0:24)

This is the Buffalo plus podcast brought to you by Connors and Ferris.

B (0:28)

Right. Welcome back to the Buffalo plus podcast, presented by Connors and Ferris, Mike Catalana, Dan Fates. I am Jenna Cotrell. Please be sure to, like, comment, subscribe and share.

C (0:37)

40,000.

B (0:38)

Woo. We.

C (0:38)

We're approaching. That's the next goal.

A (0:40)

That's it.

B (0:41)

Yes. So we are closing. We're going to talk about the NFL owner meetings, what's gone down, some James Cook stuff, some contract stuff, a little draft prep as well, talking corners. But I feel like we have to start with the news of the day as we record this on Monday. And that is the Tush push and all of the. Can we call it drama?

C (1:03)

Yeah, we have to talk about the drama of pushing Tushes. Yep. I did that as a tease the one time before a six o' clock show. Big laughs, tough to get through.

A (1:13)

Yeah, news people do like to laugh.

C (1:15)

They.

A (1:16)

Yeah, no one fakes la fake laughs more than news people.

B (1:19)

For the record, though, that was not a fake laugh.

C (1:21)

Yeah.

B (1:22)

Okay.

C (1:22)

Tushing the pushing of tushes.

B (1:24)

All right, do you want to get.

C (1:25)

No, I want you to go first.

B (1:27)

Okay.

Summary

Buffalo Plus: A Buffalo Bills Podcast – April 1, 2025

Episode Theme:
This engaging episode dives into Buffalo Bills’ hot topics from the NFL Owners Meetings. The crew—Mike Catalana, Jenna Cottrell, and Dan Fates—debate the Bills’ complex stance on the "Tush Push" quarterback sneak, dissect the ongoing contract saga around James Cook, and explore CB draft prospects. The discussion is rich with personal opinions, data deep-dives, and plenty of signature Buffalo Plus banter.

Main Topics & Key Takeaways

1. The "Tush Push" Controversy (00:41–23:25)

Overview

The episode’s central debate revolves around the Bills’—and Sean McDermott’s—strong push to ban the so-called "Tush Push" QB sneak, despite the Bills being one of the most frequent (and successful) users of the play after the Eagles.

Key Points & Insights

Sean McDermott’s Stance (01:45, 02:17)
- At the NFL Owners Meetings, McDermott advocates banning the Tush Push, citing "player safety"—despite a lack of data supporting increased injury risk.
- Sean McDermott [02:17]: "My biggest concern is the health and safety of the players, first and foremost... we're going to always act in a way that's best for the health and safety of the players."
Bills’ Contradiction (04:08, 04:14)
- The panel is baffled: The Bills run the play the second-most in the league, yet push to ban it.
- Jenna Cottrell [04:08]: "The fact that [McDermott] wants to ban the play, but also has been one of the teams that runs the play the most— that is where I don’t understand the logic."
Competitive Advantage Discussion (13:08–14:35)
- Mike argues the Bills have a unique competitive edge because Josh Allen excels at the play.
- Mike Catalana [13:14]: “You have a competitive advantage over all these teams... Josh has never gotten hurt on that play.”
Player Safety: Data Disconnect (07:24–10:03, 14:42–17:13)
- No evidence supports increased risk with the Tush Push; the crew compares it to other high-injury plays that led to rule changes.
- Dan Fates [14:42]: “There’s no data... that the Tush Push play is more dangerous than a quarterback scrambling.”
- The NFL has overlooked proven injury risks elsewhere (like artificial turf).
Is It Just Because of the Eagles? (07:33–08:01, 16:25)
- The suggestion that the Bills (or others) want the play banned because the Eagles are too good at it—firmly rejected by the hosts.

Notable Quote

Mike Catalana [14:00]: “He’s gotten hurt more when he tries to hurdle somebody. It makes zero sense. I don’t believe the injury part... For the Bills of all teams to be the ones who want to ban it, I think is absurd.”

Memorable Moment

Dan Fates [10:41], referencing online pushback: “If we’re banning things some teams are good at and others aren’t, I’d add football in cold weather, winning playoff games, interceptions...”

Owners Meeting Dynamics

The crew describes the chaotic, informal roundtable of the Owners Meeting (08:28), highlighting how McDermott became the focal point of coverage for his position.

2. James Cook Contract Saga (24:09–33:54)

Overview

The hosts break down Brandon Beane’s candid update on contract talks with RB James Cook, dissect the philosophical and financial stances, and compare Cook’s situation to recent extensions for other Bills.

Key Points & Insights

Beane’s Candidness (24:13–25:30)
- No agreement with Cook’s camp; Beane stops short of promising any imminent negotiations.
- Brandon Beane [24:13]: “Just because we don't have James signed today doesn't mean next year we still can't get him before he gets to free agency.”
Player Leverage & Market Dynamics (27:11, 28:13)
- The Bills retain leverage given Cook’s contract status and their track record with running backs.
- Mike Catalana [28:13]: “He is the best of those running backs that they've had... but he's still a 40-some percent snap count guy.”
Future Outlook and Draft Implications (27:21, 27:51)
- The team’s draft moves—especially if they use a day-two pick on a running back—will be “very telling.”
Buffalo’s "Fair Offer" Approach (29:12, 30:20)
- Beane gives a number; if Cook wants more, the Bills won’t be held "hostage."
- Mike Catalana [29:12]: “They’re just not going to be held hostage... at that position.”
- Jenna Cottrell [30:20]: “There’s quite a large gap between where both sides are.”

Notable Quotes

Dan Fates [26:44]: “That was as stern as I've ever seen Beane publicly be about a player.”

3. Christian Benford Deal & Contracting Philosophy (33:54–38:52)

Overview

Using Benford’s extension as an example, the crew outlines how the Bills structure practical, “team-friendly” deals while providing security for emerging players.

Key Points

Benford’s Security vs. Upside
- Signing early offers “life-changing money”—especially for late-round picks.
- Comparison to MLB contract philosophy: lock in security, even if you might make more waiting.
General Contract Trend
- Bean tries to extend before the final year; usually, deals that don’t get done by then, don’t get done at all.

Notable Quote

Mike Catalana [34:42]: “A lot of guys sit at home and say, ‘You should wait it out.’ Wait till they offer you that money. See if you take it.”

4. NFL Draft: Cornerback Prospects (39:05–44:34)

Overview

The trio debates potential cornerback prospects for the Bills, highlighting mid-round finds and the team’s defensive scheme needs.

Key Points

Top Names & Fits
- Maxwell Harrison (Kentucky): "I like the kid from Kentucky." – Dan (39:13)
- Azariah Thomas (Florida State): “The Bills type—good tackler, physical, with size and speed.” – Mike (40:25)
- Siobhan Ravel (East Carolina): Noted as a once top prospect dropped by injury.
- Darien Porter (Iowa State): A 6th-year senior, WR-turned-cornerback with intriguing athletic upside but raw.
Team Philosophy:
- Bills won’t draft a corner who can’t tackle.
- Scheme versatility (zone/man) factors heavily in their selection.

5. Notable Quotes & Signature Moments

On Data vs. Narrative (07:24):
- C: “It always sounds good when you say players health and safety, but you don't apply that really where it matters.”
On Leveraging Strengths (13:54):
- A: “What does Mina Kimes say about the Bills quarterback? He’s literally a Buffalo.”
On Social Media Contract Expectations (26:51):
- C: “But I did find that to be a very black and white comment... Like, it doesn't sound like we're going to be talking in week six about doing this."
Philosophy on Waiting for a Bigger Contract (34:42):
- A: “Wait till they offer you that money. See if you take it.”

TIMESTAMPS FOR IMPORTANT SEGMENTS

| Segment / Topic | Timestamp | |------------------------------------------------|----------------| | Tush Push Drama Introduction | 00:41–01:45 | | McDermott’s Owners Meeting Statement | 01:45–03:05 | | Hosts’ Data & Logic Dissection | 04:08–07:24 | | Owners Meeting Dynamics & NFL Context | 08:28–09:03 | | Competitive Advantage for Bills | 13:08–14:35 | | Notable Social Media Satire | 10:41 | | Consensus on Play’s Safety (No Data) | 14:42–17:13 | | What Happens Next / Usage in 2025? | 23:05–23:18 | | James Cook Contract Soundbite (Brandon Beane) | 24:13–25:30 | | Bills' Leverage & Extension Philosophies | 27:11–29:28 | | Team-Friendly Deals, Early Security | 33:54–34:42 | | Cornerback Prospects Discussion | 39:05–44:34 |

Flow & Tone

The hosts’ banter remains sharp and friendly—infused with sarcasm, sports analogies, and occasional playful baseball sidetracks.
Language is casual and conversational, but the analysis is meticulous, referencing statistical evidence and front-office philosophy.
The team maintains transparency about their opinions vs. what’s "out there" in Bills & NFL circles.

For New Listeners

This episode is a dynamic primer to the current Bills landscape and NFL rule debate. You’ll walk away understanding:

Why banning (or not banning) the Tush Push is such a big deal—and why the Bills’ position is controversial.
Where James Cook’s contract situation stands, and how the team builds their roster with tough financial choices.
Which CBs to watch as draft season heats up and how the Bills’ defense might evolve.

If you care about the intersection of football logic, front-office strategy, and the quirkiest moments at NFL owners meetings, this episode is a must-listen.