
Loading summary
Tim Miller
Hey, y'all, it's Tim Miller from the Bulwark. The knives are out for Pete Hegseth. There are two bombshell stories out on this Easter evening targeting the Secretary of Defense. One from the New York Times. Another is an op ed by a former Hegseth staffer and close confidant in Politico. I want to go over both of them with you. I think at the biggest picture here, it shows that there is deep concerns about Hegseth from inside the Trump bubble, from inside the MAGA house. And the sourcing on these stories, I think points to people very close to Pete and close to Trump. And they are really trying their best, I think, to get Hegseth removed from Foggy Bottom. I mean, I think that is really the top line here. But let's get into the details. First for the New York Times, there is another chat. There is another signal chat. Signal gate is not over. This signal chat was started by Pete Hegseth, not by Mike Waltz. It was regarding the same attack in Yemen, though, that was central to that first signal chat that they had accidentally put the editor in chief of the Atlantic, Jeff Goldberg on. In this one, Pete Hegseth started a chat titled let's pull it up here, Defense team huddle. You might think on the defense team huddle, you know, there would be, you know, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, let's say head of the Air Force, you know, top, top military advisors. You know, it's kind of a need to know thing for people, part of the military operations. You would be wrong if you thought that the people in the defense team huddle where Pete Hegseth was sharing military operations included his wife, a Fox News producer. It was she was an underling of his when they had an affair. She's his third wife you might be familiar with. Jennifer is on this chat. In addition to Hegseth's brother Phil. Phil Hegseth is, is on the bombing chat, also his personal lawyer, Tim Parlatore and some other Hegseth friends and confidants. The chat was started on his personal phone, not government issued phone. And it discussed, among other things, the flight schedules for the F A 18 Hornets that were targeting the Houthis in Yemen, as well as the same attack plans that he shared on that other signal chat. This again, is hard to even really comprehend. The idea that the secretary of Defense would start a private chat on an unsecured public app. Well, not a public app, but on an app that anyone in the public could download, like this is not you Know, I had Susan Rice on a couple weeks ago, who was national security advisor under Obama, and listening to her talk about the precautions that these folks would take. You know, going into secure rooms, using secure phones, you know, going into the situation room. Right. Like, the idea that this would be on the app signal, which I have on my phone, and that it would include his wife, who is a TV producer, you know, as well as some PR people, and his brother Phil. Insane. Insane. But again, as related to the second Politico story, I think it levels up to the bigger question here, which is how did this get leaked? Who would have leaked this? Like, the types of people that would have known about this chat are on the defense team huddle, right? So it's, again, the sourcing is coming from inside the house here. Hegseth has had some firings. I'm gonna get to that in a second. So maybe it's some of his staffers who were unhappy about being dismissed, but, boy, I mean, unbelievably irresponsible, unbelievably hackish. Exactly what you thought you would get when you did it. Put a weekend Fox and Friends host who. Who had a long history of reckless personal behavior in charge of the biggest bureaucracy in the world, in charge of the American military. You knew it would be ugly, but this is comically ugly. This takes us to the Politico story, and I just want to set the table here. What is as important here is who wrote this as the details in the story. The author is a guy named John Oliott. Oliott has been a longtime advisor to Donald Trump and a longtime friend of Pete Hegseth. He worked for Trump all the way back to 2016. So this is not one of these deep state staffers that, like, happen to be at the Pentagon that is now blowing the whistle. This is somebody that has been around for a while. Also worth noting, this is not somebody that was part of the purge. I mentioned earlier that Hegseth had fired his chief of staff, Joe Casper, in addition to a couple other people who were said to have leaked, been part of unauthorized leaks to the media, a deputy chief of staff and a senior advisor, maybe one other person. So several people have been fired. And the author of this story, John Oliott, is not one of those people. So he is a longtime friend of Hegseth, somebody that worked for Trump going back to 2016. He had worked for Hegseth already in this administration. He was, I guess, put in place to kind of set up the public affairs shop and the PR shop at the Pentagon. So he was, you know, in, in this administration, Pete Hegseth asked Oly to take a promotion, but he didn't do it. And he explains in this Politico story why he writes this. Even strong backers of the secretary must admit the last month has been a full blown meltdown at the Pentagon and it's becoming a real problem for the administration. He goes into the signal gate story, which obviously was brushed off among the official talking points by the Trump administration. Olyk goes into why that is actually extremely serious and the efforts to brush it under the rug were unserious. He also says that the crisis communications advice trying to spin it that Hegseth got was horrible. He compares about the worst thing you can compare it to if you're a Republican. He says it's Clintonian, you know, the non denial denial that he gave. So he rips Hegseth both for the recklessness of his behavior on the signal chain, but also the way he handled it from a PR standpoint. He goes on to talk about how his wife, who we've already mentioned, the former Fox News producer third wife, how she was brought to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed, how inappropriate that was. He talks about the top secret briefing that was set up for Elon Musk about China despite the fact that Elon has extensive business interests in China. That became a controversy. They added in a line about this New York Times story, which broke this evening about the second signal chat. And then he writes this ominously. There are very likely more shoes to drop in short order with even bigger bombshell stories coming this week. Pentagon reporters have been telling sources privately. So wow, he goes on there to talk about how he's still supporter of Donald Trump, blah, blah, blah, and how, you know, in order to best serve Donald Trump, he needs to move on from Pete Hegseth. It ends like this. The president deserves better than the current Michigan at the Pentagon. Excuse me if I'm not pronouncing my Yiddish correctly there, but given his record of holding prior cabinet leaders accountable, many in the secretary's own inner circle will applaud quietly if Trump chooses to get rid of Hegseth. So that's as blunt as it could be. A Hegseth ally, a former top Hagseth staffer who left on his own accord, not somebody who was disgruntled and fired, says that the inner circle will applaud if Trump gets rid of Hegseth. So like this right here is nothing other than what you're seeing Right here is nothing short of a coordinated attack from top allies of Hegseth and Trump on Hegseth because they believe him to be so irresponsible, so erratic, so unprepared for this job that they want Trump to kick him out. That is gobsmacking. We are three months into this administration, we are exactly three months from Inauguration Day, and Pete Hegseth is not being run out on a rail by the New York Times or the Bulwark or the liberals with tds. His inner circle is trying to run him out. They believe that he can't do the job. So again, this is something that's very obvious to all of us. Anybody who's watching this would have known that a weekend TV show anchor was not prepared to run the military, especially one with Pete Hegseth's track record of just being a total disaster in his private life. I don't need to re go over all of the details of his private life, but it is just an utter disaster. All of us have our own issues in our personal life we all try to overcome, but you don't want somebody running the military that has, you know, no track record, that doesn't have the resume, that isn't prepared. And also on top of that is a complete disaster in his personal life. So, like, there was nothing, when you looked at the Pete Hegseth resume that made you think this person would be do a good job running the military. That said, it was obvious to us, wasn't obvious to the Trump team. They, they stuck with them. They moved on from Gates, they stuck with Hegseth. Republican senators, almost all of them voted for this man. Talk about the height of irresponsibility. John Cornyn, Thom Tillis, all these assholes voted for this man to be Secretary of Defense. And now after just three months, it's his inner circle that's like, this is such a disaster. We have to move on. Like, this is such a disaster. We need to leak to the New York Times about how big of a disaster he is in some cases. And in the case of Olyat, I need to put my name on an op ed in Politico basically begging President Trump to fire the person that I had worked for. Astonishing. Astonishing. Breaking news. A total dumpster fire at the Pentagon. Much more on this with Bill Kristol on tomorrow's podcast, but wanted to get the breaking news to you all. I'll be back here tomorrow. Please subscribe to the feedback. Happy Easter to everybody except Pete Hegseth and Phil, his brother, who for some reason was getting military plans on a private signal chain. We'll be seeing all of you very soon.
Bulwark Takes Episode Summary: "BREAKING: Knives Out For Hegseth! Second Signal Chat! Trump Staff Wants Him Gone!"
Release Date: April 21, 2025
Introduction
In this explosive episode of Bulwark Takes, host Tim Miller delves into the latest turmoil surrounding Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Titled "BREAKING: Knives Out For Hegseth! Second Signal Chat! Trump Staff Wants Him Gone!", the episode examines two significant stories that have emerged in the news cycle, highlighting internal conflicts within the Trump administration and raising serious concerns about Hegseth's tenure at the Pentagon.
Key Topics Discussed
Bombshell Stories Targeting Pete Hegseth
New York Times Report: The New York Times has revealed details about a second Signal chat initiated by Hegseth. This chat, titled "Defense Team Huddle," was conducted on Hegseth's personal phone rather than a secure government-issued device. Participants included his wife, third wife Jennifer (a Fox News producer), his brother Phil, personal lawyer Tim Parlatore, and other close associates. The conversation covered sensitive topics such as flight schedules for F/A-18 Hornets targeting the Houthis in Yemen.
Politico Op-Ed by John Oliott: John Oliott, a longtime Trump advisor and former Hegseth staffer, penned an op-ed in Politico condemning Hegseth's actions. Oliott criticized the lack of secure communication channels, Hegseth's reckless behavior, and poor public relations handling of the Signal chat scandal. He explicitly called for Hegseth's removal, stating, "The president deserves better than the current Michigan at the Pentagon."
Internal Fallout Within the Trump Administration
Leaked Information from Inside the Administration: Both stories indicate that the sourcing for these leaks comes from within Hegseth's inner circle, suggesting a coordinated effort by his own staff and close Trump allies to remove him from his position.
Firings of Key Staffers: Hegseth has dismissed several high-ranking staff members, including Chief of Staff Joe Casper and other officials accused of unauthorized leaks. This internal purging has fueled speculation about the administration's growing dissatisfaction with his performance.
Inappropriate Use of Communication Platforms
Use of Signal App for Sensitive Communications: Tim Miller emphasizes the gravity of Hegseth using the Signal app, a widely available messaging platform, for classified military communications. He remarks, "The idea that the secretary of Defense would start a private chat on an unsecured public app... Insane."
Involvement of Non-Official Personnel: The inclusion of Hegseth's wife and other non-military associates in these chats raises significant security concerns, as highlighted by Miller.
Potential Consequences and Future Developments
Anticipation of Further Revelations: Oliott's op-ed hints at more explosive information forthcoming, suggesting that additional "bombshell stories" may emerge soon, exacerbating the crisis at the Pentagon.
Political Repercussions: The backlash from Republican senators who supported Hegseth, such as John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, may intensify as the administration grapples with the fallout from these revelations.
Notable Quotes
Tim Miller (00:00): "The knives are out for Pete Hegseth. There are two bombshell stories out on this Easter evening targeting the Secretary of Defense."
Tim Miller (07:30): "Unbelievably irresponsible, unbelievably hackish. Exactly what you thought you would get when you did it."
John Oliott (via transcript, Politico Op-Ed): "The president deserves better than the current Michigan at the Pentagon."
Insights and Analysis
Tim Miller provides a critical analysis of the situation, arguing that Hegseth's actions demonstrate a profound lack of judgment and preparedness for his role as Secretary of Defense. He underscores the irony of Hegseth's media background, suggesting that his presence in such a pivotal military position was ill-conceived from the outset. Miller also highlights the broader implications for the Trump administration, questioning the decision-making processes that led to Hegseth's appointment despite apparent missteps.
Furthermore, the episode sheds light on the internal divisions within the administration, revealing that even staunch Trump supporters are growing weary of Hegseth's performance. This internal dissent marks a significant shift, indicating that the pressure to replace Hegseth may come from unexpected quarters within the Republican leadership.
Conclusions
The episode of Bulwark Takes paints a concerning picture of instability and mismanagement at the Pentagon under Pete Hegseth's leadership. With credible leaks from within his own circle and high-ranking officials calling for his dismissal, the future of Hegseth's tenure appears increasingly precarious. As the administration faces mounting pressure, the coming weeks are likely to be pivotal in determining whether Hegseth remains in his role or is swiftly removed in response to the unfolding crisis.
Looking Ahead
Tim Miller hints at further discussions on this ongoing saga in future episodes, particularly with guest Bill Kristol, promising listeners more in-depth analysis and updates on the Pentagon's "total dumpster fire." The episode serves as a crucial update for those following the Trump administration's internal dynamics and the stability of its key military leadership.
Final Remarks
As the news cycle continues to churn, Bulwark Takes remains committed to providing timely and insightful commentary on the most pressing issues. This episode underscores the magazine's dedication to unpacking complex political developments and offering listeners a clear understanding of the factors at play behind the headlines.