Loading summary
Andrew Egger
Hi, this is Andrew Egger with the Bulwark. Whatever happened to that glorious clash of civilizations we were supposed to be about to launch against China just a few weeks ago? Two superpowers enter, one superpower leaves. I mean, you probably have butter in your fridge that you bought back when this was the line on the trade war.
Kevin O'Leary
This is not about tariffs anymore. Nobody has taken on China yet. Not the Europeans, no administration for decades. As someone who actually does business there, I've had enough. The government cheats and steals. And finally an administration. You may not like Trump, you may not like his style or his rhetoric. Finally an administration that puts up and says enough.
Andrew Egger
That was Kevin O' Leary. You might know him as Mr. Wonderful from Shark Tank talking about the absolute need for the US to go to total economic war against China like yesterday. China's a bad economic actor. China can't be trusted as a business partner on the world stage. China, China lies and cheats and steals and the world has been putting up with their shit for too long. And thank God the Trump administration is finally here on the scene with the stones to make them pay for it. That clip of Mr. Wonderful went super viral on the MAGA right last month after Trump's first Post Liberation Day pivot when he refocused his message from Trump takes on everybody to Trump takes on China. He dropped most of the massive tariffs he had placed on basically every nation in the world and he ratcheted the tariffs on China up to 135%. Donald Cliff Jr. Shared that clip with some 100 emojis. Libs of TikTok tweeted it out approvingly. Charlie Kirk played it at the top of his radio show. MAGA influencer Benny Johnson posted that China is the testing ground for the World Economic Forum's vision of a future totalitarian state. China must fail. Trump knows this. This is more than just a trade war. Maga influencer Andrew McCarthy is also a failed congressional candidate. Called it the hardest shit I've heard in the 10 years of MAGA. Now, at the time, there was actually pretty good reason to believe that the, the spirit of that Mr. Wonderful clip was pretty much the White House's actual plan, their actual trade policy on China. The day that Trump refocused those tariffs on China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant told reporters this had secretly been Trump's plan from the very beginning.
Scott Bessant
All this was again, this was driven by the President's strategy. He and I had a long talk on Sunday and this was his strategy all and that, you know, you Might even say that he goaded China into a bad position. They, they responded. They have shown themselves to the world to be the bad actors. And we are willing to cooperate with our allies and with our trading partners who did not retaliate. It wasn't a hard message. Don't retaliate. Things will turn out well.
Andrew Egger
A few days after that, the Wall Street Journal reported that a keystone of the White House's trade strategy was, quote, to extract commitments from U.S. trading partners to isolate China's economy in exchange for reductions in trade and tariff barriers imposed by the White House. So there it was. The US Was done getting pushed around by China. We were finally going to get tough and make them pay for their crimes. Donald Trump was the only guy with the will to do it. Until he wasn't. This week, the White House has essentially said, actually, just kidding about all that. Here was Trump in Switzerland just a couple days ago announcing a total reset in relations with China.
Kevin O'Leary
In addition, yesterday, we achieved a total reset with China. After productive talks in Geneva, both sides now agreed to reduce the tariffs imposed after April 2 to 10% for 90 days as negotiators continue in the larger structural issues.
Andrew Egger
So after a month of heavy tariffs and zero concessions from the Chinese, those trade barriers were coming down. All that stuff about wielding US Economic power to isolate China. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick waved it off this weekend as fake news by the White House. The idea being not to let China flood these other countries with their products or to relocate things to these areas where they would avoid U.S. tariffs. Are those part of your conversations, those themes? No, no. You know, that's. Again, this fake news. I mean, honestly, this is all pretty much fine with us at the Bulwark, right? We were, we were never into the whole pointless trade war in the first place. Turning off the tariffs bigot means no more pointless economic devastation, no more annihilation of US Small businesses, no more idling ports, no more threats of empty shelves, no more telling little girls, you know, that they, they, they might have to scale back their expectations for Christmas this year. I mean, all of this, all of this stuff is, is good. Even though, you know, Trump obviously has not rolled back the tariffs all the way against China. You know, we're still looking at a certain amount of economic friction, but after a full month of the U.S. government, you know, beating the U.S. economy with a stick, it sure feels good to have them stop. But wait a minute. It was just weeks ago, again, that the White House, the whole MAGA influencer ecosystem, was calling us all to battle stations against China, promising that no economic cost was too great to pay in order to bring that whole evil empire, the red Dragon in Beijing, to heel. Again, you really can't overstate this point. Here again, one more clip of Scott Bessant just a week ago, less than a week ago, calling on the nation's children to embrace the possibility of a little material pain in the form of fewer and more expensive toys in order to secure a bright, brave future.
Scott Bessant
This reporter behind me was quite snarky the other day when President Trump talked about the girl having two dolls and he said, well what president didn't take the question, but he said, what would you tell that girl? I said, I would tell that young girl that you will have a better life than your parents. That you and your family, thanks to President Trump, can now be confident again that you will have a better life than your parents. Which working class Americans had abandoned that idea. Your family will own a home, you will be able to advance, you will have a good education, you will have economic freedom. That's what we are advancing.
Andrew Egger
So supposedly again, just days ago, the White House fully in on this idea. The whole MAGA influencer ecosystem totally in on the idea. So I guess it's fair to speculate. Do you think we have seen dismay from MAGA posters since Trump pulled the plug here? Do you think that the Benny Johnson's of the world feel a sense of betrayal that the great trade war with China, which again is absolutely critical for our national health and well being, they said, but which nobody before ever had the stones to launch, Nobody really ever had the, had the will to bring China to account? Do you think that they feel a little rug pulled that that trade war has been called off with zero concessions from Beijing? Well, lives a TikTok right here. Exactly what I voted for. Benny Johnson. Markets roar. After China bows to Trump, these people couldn't be happier. It's yet another win. Thank you, Mr. President. They loved the trade war when it went on. They love the trade war when it comes off. Look at these major gainers. Some stocks up 30%. Geez. 25, 24, 22. None of this is surprising. I mean we, we know these people know on what side their bread is buttered, right? They like Trump, their audience likes Trump. Everything Trump does is an act of genius. It's the next step. It's the 4D chess. But it's still striking to see it all kind of laid out like this. None of these people really meant it when they were telling us again just weeks ago that no economic pain was too much to pay because of the glorious shining vision of on the other side of that pain. We know they didn't mean that because they folded at the first signs that economic pain was actually underway again. This was one month back that we launched this whole thing and we're already getting this reset, this, this, this beautiful big new reset with, with China relations. So I think it's fair to ask and fair to, you know, bring up to the MAGA people in your life. If the media sources that you trust are, are willing to trade your trust so lightly on this, what bill of goods wouldn't they try to sell you? We can stop there. Thanks for watching. Thanks for subscribing to our channel. Head over to the Bulwark.com to check out our reading. There's a lot of this same stuff in Morning Shots, my newsletter with Bill Kristol this morning. Thanks and we'll see you next time.
Bulwark Takes: China Just EMBARRASSED Trump and MAGA – Detailed Summary
Episode Release Date: May 13, 2025
Host: Andrew Egger
Featuring: Kevin O'Leary
In this episode of Bulwark Takes, host Andrew Egger delves into the evolving dynamics of the U.S.-China trade relationship, particularly focusing on recent policy shifts under the Trump administration. The discussion centers on the initial aggressive stance against China, the subsequent policy reset, and the reactions from the MAGA (Make America Great Again) ecosystem.
Kevin O'Leary, popularly known as Mr. Wonderful from Shark Tank, passionately argues for an uncompromising economic stance against China.
Kevin O'Leary [00:15]: "This is not about tariffs anymore. Nobody has taken on China yet. Not the Europeans, no administration for decades. As someone who actually does business there, I've had enough. The government cheats and steals. And finally an administration. You may not like Trump, you may not like his style or his rhetoric. Finally an administration that puts up and says enough."
O'Leary emphasizes China's detrimental economic practices, asserting that the Trump administration is the first in decades to take a firm stand against Beijing's "lying, cheating, and stealing." His fervent call for a "total economic war against China" resonated strongly within the MAGA circles, gaining widespread attention and support across various media platforms.
Initially, the Trump administration's approach was characterized by aggressive tariffs aimed exclusively at China. This strategy was perceived as a long-overdue move to hold China accountable for its economic maneuvers.
After President Trump shifted his focus to China, he implemented substantial tariff increases, raising them up to 135%.
Andrew Egger [00:41]: "China, China lies and cheats and steals and the world has been putting up with their shit for too long. And thank God the Trump administration is finally here on the scene with the stones to make them pay for it."
This decisive action was lauded by prominent MAGA influencers:
Supporting the administration's hardline stance, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant provided official backing for the tariff strategy.
Scott Bessant [02:12]: "All this was again, this was driven by the President's strategy. He and I had a long talk on Sunday and this was his strategy all and that... They responded. They have shown themselves to the world to be the bad actors..."
Bessant revealed that Trump's approach was intended to provoke China into a weaker position, thereby exposing its "bad actor" status on the global stage. He also hinted at leveraging alliances to isolate China economically.
The Wall Street Journal later disclosed that a cornerstone of the White House’s trade strategy was to secure commitments from U.S. trading partners to collectively isolate China's economy. This quid pro quo involved reducing trade and tariff barriers in exchange for other nations joining the U.S. in economic isolation of China.
Andrew Egger [02:47]: "So there it was. The US Was done getting pushed around by China. We were finally going to get tough and make them pay for their crimes. Donald Trump was the only guy with the will to do it. Until he wasn't."
Contrary to earlier aggressive measures, the Trump administration recently announced a significant policy shift towards China, effectively resetting trade relations.
Kevin O'Leary [03:20]: "In addition, yesterday, we achieved a total reset with China. After productive talks in Geneva, both sides now agreed to reduce the tariffs imposed after April 2 to 10% for 90 days as negotiators continue in the larger structural issues."
This reset came after a month of steep tariffs and perceived intransigence from China. The agreement to lower tariffs to 10% for 90 days signaled a temporary thaw in U.S.-China economic relations, leaving the broader structural issues to be renegotiated.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick quickly downplayed the administration's initial trade strategy, labeling it as "fake news."
Andrew Egger [03:39]: "Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick waved it off this weekend as fake news by the White House. The idea being not to let China flood these other countries with their products or to relocate things to these areas where they would avoid U.S. tariffs."
Lutnick's dismissal indicated a retreat from the previously aggressive stance, casting doubt on the sustainability and seriousness of the administration's commitment to isolating China economically.
Andrew Egger articulates the Bulwark’s nuanced stance on the rapid policy changes.
Andrew Egger [04:30]: "We were, we were never into the whole pointless trade war in the first place. Turning off the tariffs means no more pointless economic devastation, no more annihilation of US small businesses, no more idling ports, no more threats of empty shelves..."
While expressing relief at the cessation of harsh tariffs, Egger underscores the inconsistency in the administration’s approach, highlighting the lack of substantial concessions from China despite significant economic pressure.
The episode explores the MAGA supporters' reactions to the abrupt policy reset, suggesting a disconnect between their initial fervor and subsequent acceptance of the changes.
Andrew Egger [05:18]: "So supposedly again, just days ago, the White House fully in on this idea. The whole MAGA influencer ecosystem totally in on the idea. So I guess it's fair to speculate..."
Egger posits that MAGA influencers might feel a sense of betrayal or confusion, given the quick reversal from aggressive tariffs to a more conciliatory approach without tangible concessions from China. Alternatively, some may perceive the reset as another strategic maneuver by Trump rather than a genuine policy shift.
Andrew Egger [05:56]: "We know they didn't mean that because they folded at the first signs that economic pain was actually underway again. This was one month back that we launched this whole thing and we're already getting this reset, this, this, this beautiful big new reset with, with China relations."
The episode concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of the Trump administration’s inconsistent trade policies towards China and the reactions from its staunch supporters.
Andrew Egger questions the sustainability and authenticity of the MAGA narrative, suggesting that the quick policy reversals undermine the perceived strength and resolve that were initially championed. The Bulwark emphasizes the importance of coherent and consistent policy-making, contrasting it with the opportunistic shifts observed in the current political landscape.
Notable Quotes Recap:
This episode offers a critical examination of the fluctuating U.S.-China trade relationship under the Trump administration, highlighting the challenges of maintaining a consistent foreign policy and the complexities of rallying support within polarized political factions.