Loading summary
Heidi Heitkamp
Rural communities are being squeezed from every side, from rising health care costs to crumbling hospitals, from attacks on public schools to the fight for paid family and medical leave. Farmers and small businesses are reeling from the trade war. And now Project 2025 is back with a plan to finish what Elon Musk started. Trump and the Republicans won rural votes, then turned their backs on us. Join the One Country Project for the rural progress summit, July 8th through the 10th. This free virtual event brings together leaders like Senator Heidi Heikamp, Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Governor Andy Beshear, and others for real talk and real solutions. Together, we'll tackle the most urgent issues facing rural America. Register today or learn more@ruralprogress.com.
Tim Miller
Hey, guys, Tim Miller from the Bulwark back here with managing editor Sam Stein. I want to talk with one more subplot about what is happening on the Hill with this big whatever bill, the reconciliation bill. I'm tired of coming up with different nicknames for it. The whole thing is so stupid that they named it this ridiculous name that we all have to deal with. This the building Phil.
Sam Stein
Yes.
Tim Miller
Yeah, the big fugly slut. All right. Elon has sent a tweet about the bill that has that, that is in line with the criticism he's been offering, but it offers one tantalizing other proposal about the potential political outcome here, which is a full on political campaign war from Elon Musk on the Republican Party. And we've seen, you know, the war of words with him and Trump. The idea of that, that Trump might be a pedophile. I mean, that got pretty intense. But here Elon is actually, is actually suggesting he's going to put some money where his mouth is and there's a real war here. So let's, let's read it and I'll get your re. Elon, every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame and they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this earth. There you go. I mean, that seems like a pretty direct threat. Will anything actually come of that? I don't know. What do you, what do you make of it?
Sam Stein
He, he is like the hyperbole from this man is truly something like, like if it's the last thing I do. I think there's going to be other things you do on earth, bud. But I, I mean, good for him.
Tim Miller
Have other children through in vitro fertilization.
Heidi Heitkamp
Among other things.
Sam Stein
Yeah. How many people will he impregnate before he primary someone is a good question. Plus or minus three, I think. I mean, look, I'm, I, I, I think it, I was waiting for whether he would do this because over the weekend he, he went off on this bill. The reason he doesn't like this bill is not just the debt and deficit. This bill, I mean, if you, over the weekend, a bunch of reporting on just what it does to the clean energy subsidies and it's kind of crazy, actually, the degree to which it just absolutely wipes out an emerging industry in this country and really sets us back from an energy production standpoint. But so he really cares about the stuff. And I was waiting after he went off on that, like, well, you know, this guy's got a lot of power, he's got a lot of money, and in theory, all he needs to do is convince four House Republicans to vote against this thing. And he's got a lot of funds that he can do to get them to vote against this thing. And then it would kill a bill. Like, surely a man worth that much money can do that. He's up the ante a little bit by saying he's gonna guarantee the primary loss of every single member. I don't think he needs to spend that much money. Just concentrate on like half a dozen. But, you know, are you listening to this?
Tim Miller
Sam has some advice on how to better bribe Republican House members. Right.
Sam Stein
Like, it's a lot cheaper, but the same outcome. I don't think he's gonna follow through on it. I just, I just don't think he's going to, nor do I think he's going to be effective. It's actually shocking to the degree to which he has. The world's richest man who helped elect all these people, suddenly became, like, kind of ineffectual in Republican circles overnight because he went to war with Donald Trump.
Tim Miller
Yeah, that's because Trump had always had the political power within the, within the party.
Sam Stein
We were debating that in real time, but I think the verdict is in.
Tim Miller
I'm pretty sure I was always on the side of it. I don't know. As I recall, I was correct about that. But, you know, some people can go back to archives, check the tape. I'm talking a lot these days. I want to read a couple more tweets because I do also want to challenge the premise that he doesn't obviously care about the green energy elements to us. But he goes on. It's obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record $5 trillion that we live in a one party country, the Porky Pig Party. I don't know if that one's going to stick, but time for a new political party that actually cares about the people. How can you call yourself the Freedom Caucus if you vote for a all caps debt slavery bill with the biggest ceiling increase in history? Rep. Andy Harris at Chip Roy. So he's calling out two specific members there, which is actually, doesn't he have.
Sam Stein
The bill wrong though? I mean like, yes, there is deficit spending, but the real problem for the deficit is that it just extends the Bush tax cuts, which are Trump, I'm sorry, Trump tax cuts, my bad distinction. But isn't that the issue? I mean, yes, they're spending on ice and all that stuff, but like really the problem is they're just extending these tax cuts.
Tim Miller
Well, they're also codifying like the extension of a lot of the increase in spending after Covid this, you know, outside of the areas of green energy and poor people's health care, so, you know, there's some other areas where they're increasing higher spending levels. Okay, Yes, I guess I think it's more about. Look, if I'm. Is Elon trying to be accurate? Probably not. I think a more precise critique of the bill is regardless of what your individual policy views are about tax cuts for the wealthy and whether you think that's good for the economy or not, the first Bush tax cuts and then even the last Trump tax cuts both came in an environment with very low interest rates where, yeah, it increased the debt and deficit. But you could make a prudential argument in this moment, particularly it was important to stimulate the economy, get more money into the cat, whatever that is not the case now. Right. So to add the biggest amount to the debt out of all of those past efforts from Bush or the stimulus under Obama or Biden or the Trump tax cuts, and to do it at a time when interest rates are high, when the debt is higher than it's ever been and when we have this massive obligation to pay for the financing of is a particularly stupid time and insane time to do this bill. And so that's like an accurate critique from Elon that, that in a perfect, in a time where they weren't motivated by politics, a lot of the House Republicans would agree with, hey guys, this.
Sam Stein
Is an ad by BetterHelp. Workplace stress is now one of the top causes of declining mental health, with 61% of the global workforce experiencing higher than normal levels of stress. To battle stress, most of us can't wave goodbye to work. And if you work for a political company, you never really wave goodbye to work. Or if you work for a YouTube operation like this one here, well, the work never stops. You never sleep. But we can start small with a focus on wellness. That's where better help comes in because therapy can be a great way to talk through the stress that you're dealing with and come up with ways to cope and to be your best self. Therapy does not just have to be for people who have experienced major trauma. With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 5 million people globally. It's convenient too. You can join a session with a therapist at the click of a button, helping you fit therapy into your busy life. Plus, you can just switch therapists at any time. As the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a diverse variety of expertise. Our listeners get 10% off their first month at betterhelp.com/Bulwark Takes. That's better. H E L p.com/Bulwark Takes. Yeah, no, no doubt. And they could have crafted this bill in a totally different way while extending the vast majority of the tax cuts and it would have, you know, been demonstrate different debt and deficit scenario here. The question though is like, you know, what, is he actually mad or is this just grandstanding? And like what, what is, could you even knock off these people in a primary? Like how would that work?
Tim Miller
Not for voting for this bill.
Sam Stein
No.
Tim Miller
And so, and I, does Elon understand that? And I don't know, is there a way to primary them via on other topics, like probably, you know, really the thing that makes you vulnerable to Republican primary right now is were you disloyal to the leader, Mr. Trump and you.
Sam Stein
Know who was disloyal?
Tim Miller
Elon.
Sam Stein
Elon.
Tim Miller
Which is going to make it hard for him too, I think, run an effective campaign. Boy, can I tell you, I love for him, you know, who would really do well. Unfortunately not my game anymore. Centrist political consultants might be getting new beach houses based having elon pump in $100 million in primary.
Sam Stein
I was just gonna say that if he really wanted to kind of make a threat to them, you know, you would, you would go after like the, you know, Mike Lawlers of the world. You would say, hey, you know, I'm gonna find someone who's gonna run against you in the general if you make it that far and just hang that out there. Be like, Look, I'll spend 100 million. 100 million. That's a lot. But it's nothing for elon. I'll spend $20 million in this congressional centrist Democrat, and I'll knock you off if you vote for this thing that might get their attention.
Tim Miller
Yeah, it's. It is. It's kind of delicious.
Sam Stein
Oh, I enjoy it. Don't get me wrong. I. I enjoy.
Tim Miller
Think that the actual impact. And it's also kind of like, really, either way, it's kind of delicious. Like, if Elon is just so limp that he's just, like, tweeting out into the ether, like, unlike just equivalent of any other poster, if he's just been reduced to just a power poster over a person of actual influence. One. One thing that.
Sam Stein
Yeah, but one thing that might actually materially matter is that it's clear that he's. Well, it's clear as of now, everything changes. Right. That he's just done with Trump. And, you know, there's all this talk about, well, maybe they could patch things up and, you know, whatever. It's. I don't. I increasingly don't see it. I don't think he's going to go after Trump, but he's definitely not going to give him $100 million to go at it again. So there's that. But I don't know, this thing just seems like on a glide path to me. Who knows? We'll see.
Tim Miller
Well, that's. That's a downer. Sam, do you have anything. And is there. Is there anything that you look at and say, well, isn't that great?
Sam Stein
No. Is there something you look at?
Tim Miller
I don't know. I was just looking at the kind of nuggets, offseason options, and it looks pretty bleak as well. I'll. I'll come up with something. Everybody subscribe to the feed, and the next time me and Sam are together, we'll come up with something positive. But I, I just think that watching the show is fun. I can. I could grab some popcorn in the meantime and watch them fight.
Sam Stein
I hope we're giving people something to enjoy, but, you know, if that's all you got, well, that's probably enough.
Tim Miller
All right, we'll see you guys soon. Subscribe to the feed. I think I said that already. Do it again. Bye.
Bulwark Takes: Episode Summary - "Elon Threatens To TAKE DOWN Republicans Who Vote for Bill"
Release Date: July 1, 2025
In this episode of Bulwark Takes, hosts Tim Miller and Sam Stein delve into the escalating tensions between entrepreneur Elon Musk and the Republican Party, particularly concerning a contentious reconciliation bill. The discussion unpacks Musk's public denunciations of Republican lawmakers who support the bill, analyzing the potential political ramifications and the broader implications for intra-party dynamics.
[01:00] Tim Miller opens the conversation by addressing the frustration surrounding the reconciliation bill, humorously referencing it as "the big fugly slut" to underscore its controversial nature. He highlights Elon Musk's critical stance on the bill, emphasizing Musk's unique position as both a critic and a significant influencer within political spheres.
[01:20] Tim Miller elaborates on Musk's threat, citing his assertion that Republicans who support the bill will face primary challenges in the next election cycle. Musk's statement, "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame and they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this earth," [01:19], signals a significant escalation in political activism from a high-profile non-politician.
[02:19] Sam Stein comments on Musk's hyperbolic approach, suggesting that while Musk’s rhetoric is extreme, his commitment could have measurable impacts if he follows through with financial backing for primary challenges.
The hosts dissect the components of the bill, addressing Musk's criticisms beyond mere fiscal concerns. [02:35] Sam Stein points out that the bill's implications on clean energy subsidies are particularly problematic, potentially stalling emerging industries and hindering the nation's energy production capabilities.
[03:47] Sam Stein expresses skepticism about Musk's ability to effect tangible change within the Republican Party. Despite Musk's vast resources, Stein questions the feasibility of convincing just four House Republicans to oppose the bill, suggesting that Musk's broader campaign strategy may lack precision.
[04:13] Sam Stein further reflects on Musk's diminished influence within Republican circles, attributing it to Musk's opposition to former President Trump, who still wields substantial power within the party.
The discussion shifts to potential alternative strategies Musk could employ to challenge Republican lawmakers. [09:19] Sam Stein suggests that targeting a broader range of Republicans or aligning against key figures like Mike Lawler might yield more substantial results than focusing solely on those who voted for the bill.
[05:03] Sam Stein and [05:22] Tim Miller debate the bill's underlying fiscal strategies, particularly the extension of tax cuts and the timing of increased spending in a high-interest environment, which compounds the deficit issues.
[08:43] Tim Miller and [08:58] Sam Stein discuss the likelihood of Musk's threats translating into effective political action. They contemplate whether Musk genuinely intends to follow through or if his statements serve as mere grandstanding without substantive backing.
As the episode wraps up, the hosts express a mix of skepticism and amusement at the unfolding drama between Musk and the Republican Party. [10:52] Tim Miller maintains a cynical outlook, while [10:52] Sam Stein acknowledges the unpredictability of political maneuvers.
They conclude by encouraging listeners to subscribe for future episodes, hinting at continued analysis of political developments.
Key Takeaways:
Elon Musk's Threat: Musk has publicly threatened to financially back primary challengers against Republican lawmakers who supported the reconciliation bill, indicating a potential shift in political influencer dynamics.
Reconciliation Bill Concerns: The bill, criticized for its substantial increase in the debt ceiling and adverse effects on clean energy subsidies, has become a focal point for internal party conflicts.
Musk's Political Influence: Despite his wealth and initial support for Republicans, Musk's conflict with Trump and his confrontational approach may limit his effectiveness within the party.
Strategic Challenges: The effectiveness of Musk's strategy is questioned, with suggestions that a more targeted approach might yield better results.
Future Implications: The episode underscores the volatility within the Republican Party and the uncertain role that external influencers like Musk may play in shaping its future.
This episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between high-profile individuals and partisan politics, offering listeners nuanced insights into the evolving landscape of American governance.