Loading summary
Unnamed Speaker (Rural Advocate)
Rural communities are being squeezed from every side, from rising health care costs to crumbling hospitals, from attacks on public schools to the fight for paid family and medical leave. Farmers and small businesses are reeling from the trade war. And now Project 2025 is back with a plan to finish what Elon Musk started. Trump and the Republicans won rural votes, then turned their backs on us. Join the One Country Project for the rural progress summit, July 8th through the 10th. This free virtual event brings together leaders like Senator Heidi Heikamp, Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Governor Andy Beshear, and others for real talk and real solutions. Together, we'll tackle the most urgent issues facing rural America. Register today or learn more@ruralprogress.com.
Unnamed Speaker (Devotional Advertiser)
Feeling restless and unfulfilled? Discover the secret to complete contentment, a devotional that leads you to true peace by living in God's abundant love. While the world offers fleeting satisfaction, God provides everything you need with each page. Grow closer to him and uncover the lasting joy found in his love. Don't wait. Experience the life God designed for you. Get your copy on Amazon or wherever you buy books.
Andrew Egger
Hi, this is Andrew Egger with the Bulwark. I'm joined here by our congressional reporter Joe Perdicone to talk Cabinet secretaries and the senators who extract promises from them. Yesterday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Very abruptly announced that he was firing every member of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, acip, which is basically just a brain trust of vaccine scientists and just kind of the top minds in the field, all of whom are there to give CDC best practices type advice for immunization schedules for when kids should get various shots in what doses. RFK Jr not so happy about it, fired the whole committee yesterday. He's going to replace them with a bunch of his own kind of hand selected MOOCs ahead of that committee's meeting in a couple of weeks here. What's interesting about this is that this is something he had explicitly pledged not to do when he was going through his gauntlet on Capitol Hill trying to get confirmed for this post. Joe, take us back, take us back to, to, you know, RFKJR's path to being confirmed for this position and, and how this all went down a few months ago.
Joe Perdicone
So with some of the nominees at the time in January, each one kind of had like a few senators who were on the fence and in order to get them over the finish line, they either had to like get scared and get with the program or they had to extract promises from these nominees. Cassidy's was like a Long list of things. Not removing information on the CDC's website that says vaccines don't cause autism, stuff like that. One of his explicit things was do not make changes to asip, this board where he just fired everybody. That's what he said in his four speech yesterday when he came into the Capitol. He kind of retconned that a little bit and said, well, actually I meant changes to the hiring process, not changes to the actual people on it. Conveniently, he was not that specific in his actual force speech when that happened. And so it was kind of an example of how, you know, Cassidy, who is an actual medical doctor, chairman of the HELP Committee which held confirmations hearings for Kennedy, but the ultimately the committee that voted on it was the Finance Committee. Just the way that works out. But his, you know, Cassidy signing off was a, was an important moment because he's very trusted on medical issues. And the fact that he got on board, he got these promises and then these promises were very clearly and abruptly broken. Kind of makes him look like a fool because it's like, what are his two excuses here? Either he was dumb and got duped, which isn't good in a senator, or he did it as like an effort to save face and doesn't really care that it's broken. You know, it makes the whole thing look very. I hate this term so much. Swampy.
Andrew Egger
Yeah, I mean, you really have to kind of hand it to RFK in at least one respect, which is that he really did this in a way that leaves Cassidy with really no excuse or no leg to stand on here. I mean, you could hardly imagine. He said rfk, Bill Cassidy. Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy gets up, you know, ahead of this confirmation vote and says, good news everybody. You might think that RFK is a big time anti vaxxer, but I have actually extracted a promise from him that he will not make changes to, to this board without, you know, giving the Senate lots of advance notice and you know, soliciting our advice on these sorts of things. And then he gets up yesterday with no it. With no notice to anybody at all and fires literally every member of the entire panel. Like everybody's gone. He's going to stock restock the entire thing with his people. Yeah, it's. And I mean, what's, what's particularly amazing about this? This is not even the first instance of this type of story, right? I mean, you, you, Cassidy was kind of the main guy who was a Will he or won't he about rfk? And he was kind of the, again, the main Figure who. Whose eventual ascent for this and other reasons, kind of smoothed his way to confirmation. A couple weeks ago, you wrote about a very comparable situation with Iowa Senator Joni Ernst, who played a very similar role when it came to the question of whether Pete Hegseth would ultimately be confirmed as Defense Secretary. Can you just walk us through, kind of roll back the clock, what happened in that case?
Joe Perdicone
So with that one, Joni Ernst, one of her biggest issues she cares about is sexual assault in the military. Pete Hexeth was accused of sexually assaulting people and was up for leading the Department of Defense. Not a great combination. And so what she did is she got a promise from him that she brought it up again in the hearing. They made the promise in private, and then she brought it up public publicly that he would appoint a senior official explicitly to handle sexual assault prevention in the military. And then he just never did. He never made that higher. When we inquired with the Defense Department last week, they said, well, there is this guy who's been there since 2019, and it's in a position that was created in 2011, and it's like, okay, so that has literally nothing to do with. With anything that was promised to Ernst. This was a new thing that. And this, you know, group called SAPRO has existed for more than a decade. And so that's really nothing. They issue reports. They're not engaged in the way that Ernst was demanding. And then when we inquired with Ernst about whether or not, you know, she's been satisfied with, you know, the current status quo, where there's this old position there and the promise hasn't been fulfilled, she said that same day, she met with the leader of sapro, which, you know, you can read as maybe she did it via zoom right after we inquired, or maybe she did it miraculously the morning before, who knows? And basically, she was caught by us, you know, the realizing that she dropped the ball in this. She didn't keep. Hegseth keep his feet to the fire to actually make this higher. Hexeth fully forgot about it by not doing it or doesn't care. And so now he's testifying on the Hill this week. And so we're gonna find out, like, is there going to be any progress here, or are they just going to keep kicking the can down the road and not actually making this hire? Another broken promise.
Andrew Egger
In a lot of ways, that's like a much smaller ball story, right? It's just like one random additional staffer at DoD as opposed to this massive, you know, shift in institutional policy. Around vaccines, this hugely controversial thing they're doing over hhs. But in some respects, that makes it like, sadder, right? Like, this was like the one extraction that Ernst took out of Hegseth as kind of a face saving move where she's like, I'm not being bullied into submission. I'm not, you know, being pressured by all these MAGA voters who say they're going to primary me, primary me if I block your nomination. No, I'm just really concerned about this particular issue. And I really think that, that if I'm gonna. If I'm gonna let you go be the Secretary of Defense, I'm really gonna make sure that you do this one thing again. It's just bringing on one staffer. Like, it's a pretty good. Even. Even in the moment. It was kind of like a, like a fig leaf sort of thing. And then the fact that he hasn't done it and the fact that she apparently only cares that he hasn't done it when she's reminded isn't. Isn't it interesting that he hasn't done this thing that you, that you supposedly. This was like the make or break thing for you. I mean, it's all just so transparently, like, transactional. Right.
Joe Perdicone
The way that Ernst and Cassidy have both handled this, first of all, the two of them are. Both are up for reelection in 2026. There's a common thread there. Both of them shouldn't be too worried about their statewide races. What they should be worried about is Republican primary challenges. That's the most concerning thing for them. And to vote against Trump's nominees in January, that was like the first litmus test where they had to get behind everyone or they are directly obstructing Trump's agenda. And so for them to present themselves as, like, concerned and needing to get promises right, based on their existing Personas in the Senate or based on, you know, whatever semblance of moderation they want to maintain. They got these promises. And the fact that they have been broken or haven't been fulfilled just shows how little it actually mattered. What mattered was them getting into a comfortable position where they could say yes on these nominees.
Andrew Egger
Yeah, yeah. And you were gonna, you were about to. Before I so rudely interrupted you. You were gonna mention a third way that, that some of these senators on the bubble have tried to handle, or I guess a second way, another way.
Joe Perdicone
That it's possible to go about this so early on. Like in December, after Trump had been elected, Thom Tillis was concerned about Republicans getting primary challengers he's another person up for reelection who's very scared of a primary challenge and having, you know, outside groups fuel or fund primary challengers against people who vote against the nominees. He was concerned about that and then all of a sudden he turned on a dime and he became Cash Patel's best friend as and kind of shepherd him through the Senate and kind of went the opposite route where he was just like, cash rules like not, not moderate, don't care. Not concerned about political politicization or weaponization at the Justice Department. Who cares? Cash is great, let's get him on board. Cash sale, do confirmation. And it worked out a lot better for him, I guess because he still hasn't gotten that like heavy duty primary challenger he has won, but it's not a big threat. He's not getting the, you know, shame of getting that broken promise which his other colleagues have. So I guess, you know, someone's happy in this whole situation.
Andrew Egger
Yeah, yeah. The incentives are what are, what are just so perverse here, right? Because if you're in a situation where like the best move, like from a purely self centered like crow, like eat the least amount of crow standpoint, then it probably is true like that, that the move is to do the Thom Tillis thing and just eat the crow up front and do the embarrassing thing up front and just get behind the guy right away, you know, let people beat on you for a little while. But then like, just like whatever, you're a team player, everyone expects it in the end and that's just what you do versus this thing where you make this big public stand and you think that Donald Trump and his MOOCs are going to let you keep like some semblance of your dignity by honoring, honoring the pledges that they made to you over there. And then again when they don't. I mean, it's not like, it's not like these people are heading to battle stations. It's not, not like they're feeling scandalized or feeling like betrayed or lied to. I mean like, I, I don't know, I feel like I'd feel, I feel like I'd go on the war path to a certain extent, right? I mean like, especially if you're Cassidy, right? I mean like in theory this is like such a deeply important issue to you. Continued health of the US Vaccine apparatus that everybody, everybody can go get their shots and extinct diseases stay extinct and people don't die of measles or rubella. But no, they're just looking for a way to save a little face before they, before they.
Joe Perdicone
I think we ultimately, the both of us, the majority of our conversations with elected officials are about politics because we write about politics. And when you do that, they all kind of fall into this, like, oh, I don't, I don't care much for politics. You know, I'm, I'm a. I'm like, more about policy. They, they care about that and none of, none of them do. Their first instinct is always politics. And this is like a perfect example of that, where the, the political path was the one they took and it backfired and they're full steam ahead. Got to remain on that, like, political right path, otherwise it all falls apart.
Andrew Egger
Yeah. Yeah. Well, we can leave it there. I was not anticipating getting good old boy vocal impression out of Joe during this video. We should, you should roll that out way more often because that was great. And, yeah, that's what we'll leave you with. So thanks, Joe, for coming on to talk about all this stuff. Obviously, he will continue to pester all these senators on the behalf of all you readers out there, watchers out there, and thanks to you all who are out there for watching and listening, and we'll keep following it. So thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.
Podcast Summary: Bulwark Takes – "GOP Senators Embarrassed AGAIN"
Episode Information
In this episode of Bulwark Takes, host Andrew Egger engages in a deep dive alongside congressional reporter Joe Perdicone to dissect recent embarrassments among GOP senators concerning broken promises to Cabinet secretaries. The conversation centers on the actions of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, highlighting the political repercussions for senators like Bill Cassidy and Joni Ernst.
Andrew Egger opens the discussion by referencing a significant move by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
"[...] RFK Jr is going to replace them with a bunch of his own kind of hand-selected MOOCs ahead of that committee's meeting in a couple of weeks here." [02:38]
Kennedy Jr.'s abrupt decision to dismiss the entire ACIP, a panel comprising leading vaccine scientists, marks a stark departure from his previous assurances during his confirmation process. This move undermines the trust Senator Bill Cassidy placed in him, who had secured Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation by extracting specific commitments.
Joe Perdicone elaborates on Cassidy’s role and the implications of the broken promise:
"Cassidy signing off was an important moment because he's very trusted on medical issues. And the fact that he got on board, he got these promises and then these promises were very clearly and abruptly broken. Kind of makes him look like a fool..." [04:40]
The betrayal poses a dilemma for Senator Cassidy, presenting him either as unwittingly duped or willingly compromising his principles, thereby tarnishing his reputation.
Transitioning to another instance, Egger draws parallels with Iowa Senator Joni Ernst’s interactions with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth concerning sexual assault prevention in the military.
Andrew Egger states:
"That's like the one extraction that Ernst took out of Hegseth as kind of a face-saving move where she's like, I'm not being bullied into submission..." [08:20]
Joe Perdicone provides context:
"Ernst was caught by us, you know, the realizing that she dropped the ball in this. She didn't keep. Hegseth keep his feet to the fire to actually make this higher. He fully forgot about it by not doing it or doesn't care." [13:20]
Despite obtaining a promise that Hegseth would appoint a senior official for sexual assault prevention, the secretary failed to fulfill this commitment, mirroring Kennedy Jr.’s actions and further illustrating a troubling pattern among GOP nominees.
Both cases reveal a strategic pattern where GOP senators extract concessions during nomination processes only to witness those promises go unfulfilled. This behavior not only undermines their credibility but also raises questions about their commitment to policy over political maneuvering.
Joe Perdicone comments on the broader implications:
"The fact that they have been broken or haven't been fulfilled just shows how little it actually mattered. What mattered was them getting into a comfortable position where they could say yes on these nominees." [10:37]
These broken promises present senators like Cassidy and Ernst with potential vulnerabilities, particularly concerning primary challenges within their own parties. Their actions may alienate voters who prioritize integrity and policy consistency over partisan loyalty.
The discussion also touches upon the inherent political strategies that drive such behaviors among senators. Andrew Egger observes:
"The incentives are what are just so perverse here, right? Because if you're in a situation where like the best move, like from a purely self centered like crow, like eat the least amount of crow standpoint, then it probably is true..." [11:57]
Joe Perdicone responds by highlighting the prevalent politicization:
"When you do that, they all kind of fall into this, like, oh, I don't, I don't care much for politics... Their first instinct is always politics." [13:20]
This underscores a systemic issue where political gains often overshadow genuine policy commitments, leading to repeated cycles of broken promises and ensuing embarrassment for involved senators.
The episode concludes with Andrew Egger acknowledging the recurring theme of political expediency within GOP senators, emphasizing the necessity for accountability and the potential repercussions in upcoming elections.
Andrew Egger wraps up:
"What mattered was them getting into a comfortable position where they could say yes on these nominees." [10:37]
As Bulwark Takes continues to monitor these developments, it underscores the importance of holding elected officials accountable for their commitments, particularly when such pledges directly impact public health and safety.
This episode of Bulwark Takes offers a critical examination of recent GOP-related political maneuvers, highlighting the tension between political strategy and policy integrity. By spotlighting the repercussions of broken promises to Cabinet secretaries, Andrew Egger and Joe Perdicone shed light on the broader implications for Republican senators and the integrity of their legislative actions.
For more insightful analysis and updates on political developments, tune in to future episodes of Bulwark Takes.