Loading summary
Transcript26 lines
- [00:00]
Shopify Advertiser
When you think about businesses that are selling through the roof, Allbirds or skims, sure you think about a great product, a cool brand and brilliant marketing. But an often overlooked secret is actually the businesses behind the business making, selling and for the shoppers buying simple. For millions of businesses, that business is Shopify. Nobody does selling better than Shopify, home of the number one checkout on the planet. And the not so secret secret with shop pay that boosts conversions up to 50%, meaning way less carts going abandoned and way more sales going. So if you're into growing your business, your commerce platform better be ready to sell wherever your customers are scrolling or strolling on the web, in your store, in their feed, and everywhere in between. Businesses that sell more sell on Shopify, upgrade your business and get the same checkout, skims uses. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com audioboom all lowercase go to shopify.com audioboom to upgrade your selling today. Shopify.com audioboom I'm gonna put you on, nephew.
- [01:11]
Sam Stein
All right, unk. Welcome to McDonald's. Can I take your order, miss?
- [01:14]
Andrew Egger
I've been hitting up McDonald's for years now. It's back. We need snack wraps. What's a snack wrap? It's the return of something great.
- [01:22]
Sam Stein
Something.
- [01:22]
Andrew Egger
Snack wrap is back.
- [01:25]
Sam Stein
Hey, guys, it's me, Sam Stein, managing at the Borg, joined by Andrew Egger, author of Morning Shots. We're here to talk about something we've never talked about before, so buckle in. Jeffrey Epstein may have heard of him. He's casting a Paul over the Trump presidency. And then apparently members of the House don't want to deal with this either. So the news that happened today. I should just be specific. Republican members of the House. News that happened today is that the House Republicans are going to put off a vote on a resolution that would have called for the release of the Epstein files. I don't even think it would have demanded the release. It was just like a sense of the House that they have that they should release the Epstein files and they're just not going to vote on it. They're just going to push it off through August. And it's kind of crazy to me that they're just going to duck it, um, unless you think that they just are doing Trump's bidding. I'm having trouble coming up with a really convincing explanation other than that. But, Andrew, what do you make of this?
- [02:25]
Political Analyst
I mean, I also have been, like, kind of trying to think of other explanations there. There is a Little bit of like, you know, kind of grumpy. We're the majority and we're not gonna let you know, members of the minority tell us what to do sort of stuff in all of this. But all along, I mean, the release the Epitine files stuff has been the kind of thing that you would see from, like, the more sort of like, base attuned members of the Republican Party. I mean, this is like a long standing thing of people like Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeting about Epstein. And the fact that it has just so immediately reversed based on just the perception that, you know, more transparency suddenly must be bad for Donald Trump in some way is really, I mean, like, we've gone around and around and around the story, but I feel like we have to belabor the point. It is shocking that, that it is so quickly become, oh, Trump doesn't want to release this stuff. I wonder why that is. And then Democrats jumping on it and asking for more transparency and Republicans digging in their heels. I mean, It's a complete 180 from where things were on this just a little while ago.
- [03:28]
Sam Stein
I was just gonna say, imagine, like two years ago, a resolution went to the House floor calling for the release of the Epstein files. Like, what would the Republican vote be on that? It would be unanimous. Right. I mean, who would be against it? It's hard to fathom that anyone would have voted against it. The second story which is related to this, because this gets at how angry the White House is on this front, is that the Wall Street Journal reporter who was supposed to cover Donald Trump in his weekend trip to Scotland as part of the pool is apparently, according to Politico, being removed from the pool. And this is, of course, following the report from the Wall Street Journal that President Trump allegedly reportedly sent a sexually suggestive message, slash poem, slash drawing doodle to Jeffrey Epstein as part of his 50th birthday celebration in 2003. Trump has sued the Journal, sued Rupert Murdoch, and now they're kicking the Journal out of the pool, which is sort of classically, you know, classically Trump, I guess.
- [04:35]
Political Analyst
Yeah. And not to, like, immediately go from what is a very significant story in terms of, you know, this, this presidency with the Epstein files and the handling of all that, to this much more inside baseball thing about, you know, pool coverage and who gets to decide who covers the president. But this is an important story, too. I mean, it matters. Exactly.
- [04:51]
Sam Stein
And this is.
- [04:51]
Political Analyst
This is, I think, a thing that kind of got swept under the rug or not. That's not the right way of putting it. But it was, it was, it didn't get nearly the airtime it deserved or when Trump was kind of breaking the norms on this earlier in his term just because there was so much other stuff going on. When he basically declared war on the White House Correspondents association, when the White House seized control of who was going to get to be in the press press room and who was going to get to ask the questions and who was going to get to be in the pool in particular. And before it was kind of like, like I say, this sort of inside baseball story in flavor. But what it ultimately boils down to is what we're seeing now, which is that the White House gets to pressure every outlet not to do enterprise reporting investigative work on stuff that is going to make the White House mad because they will yank their access instantly. And I think that I would be shocked not to see a lot more of this going forward.
- [05:43]
Sam Stein
Right. And I guess in a sort of more organized way the White House pool and the White House Correspondent association would say you can't do that or we're just going to limit everyone or some sort of collective action. But that's not going to happen here because precisely it didn't happen after they kick the AP out for not doing the Gulf of America. So why would they. Now I just going back to the first story. So I just want to read what the political reports about Mike Johnson. Mike Johnson doesn't have any plans to put a non binding resolution on the floor this week after the August recess or possibly ever they write that would call for the administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein related documents and said GOP leaders have an understanding with White House officials that the House will wait to address the matter until after the month long break in order to give the administration time to release documents on its own following President Trump's move to release grand jury information. They say information, he just meant testimony on the case. All right, so they're going to go home for like four or five weeks. Right. And what do you expect to happen here? Is part of me wonders if this is like maybe we, we're sort of in a different conversation than everyone else because we're so plugged in on this and you know, they won't get confronted back home at the August recess. Then part of me wonders if like in fact they will because the people who care about this stuff happen to be the most politically attuned people, the most likely to show up at events.
- [07:01]
Political Analyst
Yeah, that's a really interesting open question. I hadn't thought about it that way that they might receive like, more constituent pressure over this. I think a lot of these people are actively mad at Trump, you know, more so than, more so than like their random senator or congressman. Right. Like, maybe, maybe there's like an element of. It's not like that's the thing they're going to show up at the town hall to talk about.
- [07:22]
Sam Stein
Yeah, but they're like, they're the conspiracy theorists. Right. They're the ones who usually show up. I mean, that's what I've been kind of thinking about is like the Lyndon LaRouche and types like, who show up at these things to protest because they think deep down inside there is actually a global satanic pedophile cabal that's controlling everything. I mean, if that doesn't compel you to show up and talk to your member of Congress, I mean, I don't know what's going to compel you to show up.
- [07:46]
Political Analyst
Right, right. They do, they do run that risk. I do think it is still a smart move from the Trump administration to be leaning on, leaning on the House to do this. Right. I mean, I think, I think they are trying, at least in some ways. Like, I think what they're trying to do is they're trying to see one. Will this thing finally blow over? Will I be able to. I mean, we've seen this from Trump all weekend, is that he's trying to create other stories that his base will run after and pay more attention to and this will at least get back burnered and then maybe, you know, the pressure will be off, the Congress won't feel the need to do anything. And at the same time, I mean, I don't feel like I'm putting on a conspiracy theorist hat here to say there's a difference between Congress ordering the White House to release everything it has right now and the White House getting to kind of set its own schedule and decide what comes out and decide what stays buried. I mean, this is, this is what Trump has been saying all along, is Pam Bondi should just release the stuff that's credible or that's pertinent. Right. I mean, and there's an enormous amount of judgment call that goes into that for all these people who are just.
- [08:47]
Shopify Advertiser
Political flex for Donald Trump.
- [08:48]
Political Analyst
Right.
- [08:49]
Sam Stein
You wrote about this this morning, which is they are trying to dist. And I think saying release the pertinent stuff and the grand jury testimonies, that's like one degree away from a distraction. Right. It's not everything. They're just hoping that a Little bit of show can get them away from the storyline, but then you have them like saying, let's arrest Rosie o' Donnell and Barack Obama and you know, let's change the name of the Washington command back to the. Yeah, I mean, so like, there's all these distractions and I am just sort of, I know Will Summer's reporting on this today, but like, I am curious if people just see through it and.
- [09:20]
Political Analyst
They'Re like, can I, can I say one more thing on the, on the Congress stuff? Because you mentioned like, if this had happened two years ago. Well, here I go, Here I go. Watch me. You're in, you're a whole other place. You're on the other side of the Internet for me and I'm gonna talk. So you mentioned like, if this had come up two years ago, you know, Republicans would have, would have gotten on board with it. Can you imagine? Just like, just like put yourself in that imaginative headspace and think about like the conservative media coverage of Republicans pushing en masse to release the Epstein files and the Democrats in, in the House in open coordination with the Democratic White House spiking that vote and saying, we're not going to do this. We're not going to let any of this happen. I mean, come on, like the conspiracy theories would have been completely off of the charts. Like, and, and, and the. What, what is Biden in the Epstein files? What's Biden trying to hide? You know, all, all of that stuff. You can just completely game out. It would, exactly how it would happen.
- [10:10]
Sam Stein
And yet it would have programmed Alex Jones's show for like weeks. Yeah, so I, I, so the, the, the legislation that is being introduced to get or to compel the release of this Epstein case information is being introduced by Tom Massey and Rokana. It's a bipartisan duo. So they want to vote on a measure, it's discharge petition. It's what's described as maneuver that allows them to bypass leadership, force a vote on the floor if it receives 218 signatures. And it's picking up steam. Reached out to Ro Khanna about Mike Johnson doing this and he just texted back. I said, what's your theory on this? And he just wrote back. Did you see Theo Vaughn's tweet? That's all he wrote back. For some reason I wanted more from him, but I did see the of on stream. We'll put it up here. Theo Vaughan, a popular podcaster who hosted JD Vance prior to the election in which JD Vance was calling for the release of the Epstein files. On the show, Theo Von was just not impressed. Like, he's like, why don't you just bring the Massie kind of petition up for a vote? And I guess that to me signifies that both. It's breaking through a little bit more in public, obviously, Evan Sly, Shane Gillis and the ESPY words. And also that Ro Khanna is attentive and knows about Theo Von's Twitter feed and knows that the pressure is on for House Republican leadership to do these things and will continue to apply that pressure because he feels like the cultural headwinds are in his favor here.
- [11:42]
Political Analyst
Yeah, it's so funny. I almost wonder if we've like, over indexed on the manosphere, you know, like, we're all, we're all looking at Joe Rogan and Theo Vaughn and Andrew Schultz and like, you know, the way they go, thus goes America and all that stuff, when in reality, you know, they're, they're like one subculture. Right. And I do want to say, like, like, I have been wondering about this because we do have, like, actual public polling about this stuff now. Not, not of all the developers.
- [12:05]
Sam Stein
What does it say? I actually don't know what it says.
- [12:07]
Political Analyst
Well, so I have not, like, looked at an extensive array of them, but I did see one CBS poll, CBS YouGov poll over the weekend that was like, everybody hates the way that Trump is handling this, but it's very low down, basically everybody's priority list politically. Right. And that's not, that's not to say, like, it. To be honest, it bounces off in all kinds of different ways. Like, like, like maybe you don't, maybe like you don't personally care about the Epstein files all that much, but, like, the way Trump is handling them might give you pause about how he handles other things. So, like, I totally get that. I just don't. Like, we've been doing Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. And I don't want to give people the impression that, like, this is make or break for the Trump administration necessarily. Right. I mean, like, it's, it matters. It's. It hugely matters, but I think we're all still figuring out how it's going to matter and in what ways it's going to bounce and all that, 100%.
- [12:54]
Sam Stein
And we've been doing other stuff too, but it is a delicious story. All right, I was going to throw out another topic to you, but we'll save it for another time. Tease the audience with some more. Andrew Eger, thank you for joining me, man. Appreciate it. Always up to talk Epstein. That's why I really like you. And we will be looking forward to tomorrow's morning shots, which will inevitably, inevitably be about Epstein.
- [13:14]
Political Analyst
Bill will come through because Bill's back. He'll give us more Epstein.
- [13:17]
Sam Stein
All right. Thank you guys for watching this. Subscribe to the feed. We appreciate that.